Home Blog Page 1083

Neutral ‘All-In-All’ Commentator Sumanth Raman Has A Problem With ICJ Using India Today Report To Call Out Hamas Terrorists Attack

On 12 January 2024, India Today anchor and journalist Shiv Aroor shared a news report on how Israel had used an India Today report at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), Hague during the Gaza deaths hearing. 

Self-proclaimed “neutral” political commentator Sumanth Raman seemed to have come across the report only recently. He shared it on his X handle with the caption, “Isn’t this something that @IndiaToday should be ashamed of??? Unbelievable that it is being put out as a badge of honour!!!”

Journalist Shiv Aroor whose post was quoted by Sumanth Raman reposted it saying, “I thought I had seen everything in life. Then I saw Sumanth Raman talking about ‘shame’.”

An independent journalist Saikiran Kannan also questioned whether Sumanth Raman denied the mass murder carried out by Hamas terrorists on 7 October 2023. He wrote. “Now I know that Dr. Sumanth was no quiz master but just reading things out of a paper. What @ShivAroor and IT covered were the atrocities committed on Oct 7th. This report was used by Israel at the ICJ. Is Sumanth denying the atrocities committed by Hamas? Sheer pandering!!!”

Defending himself, Raman replied, “It is not a matter of pride to be quoted by Israel to defend a genocide. Hamas is a terrorist Group and is a legitimate target for Israel. Palestinian children are not. You don’t seem to understand the difference.”

The conversation continued with Saikiran Kannan pointing out that Israel’s intent with the report was to confirm the occurrence of a massacre on 7 October 2023, which had been denied by some. He emphasised that his focus was solely on the specific report and not on Israel’s subsequent justifications. Sumanth Raman while acknowledging that Hamas carried out a massacre expressed “concern” that, in the name of eliminating Hamas, Israel was engaging in a genocide of innocent Palestinian children. He also added that Israel was defending itself by showcasing the India Today clip. Raman questioned whether Israel’s self-defence involved violating the rules of war. It became quite apparent that Raman was shifting goalposts as usual and Saikiran was quick to point out that the report was used to highlight the barbarism of Hamas and that several such news reports were used by Israel to present their case at the ICJ. 

This is not the first time Sumanth Raman has exposed his alleged neutral stand. Some of his antics from the past are listed below:

He trivialised the petrol bomb attack at TN Governor RN Ravi’s residence in October 2023. He had written on his X handle that a petrol bomb attack did not indicate a breakdown of law and order. When a user raised concerns about the ease of obtaining such bombs, Raman responded by simplifying a petrol bomb as “petrol set alight with some cloth in a bottle and thrown.”

In March 2023, he spread fake news about NPCI charging a fee for UPI transactions without verifying its accuracy. After the National Payments Corporation of India clarified that the charges applied only to Prepaid Payment Instruments (PPI) and not to UPI transactions, Sumanth deleted his tweet, acknowledging the misinformation and stating that the fee was only for transactions through wallets and credit cards, not bank debits.

In May 2021, at the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic (Delta variant second wave), he questioned the efficacy of the DRDO-developed 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG) drug for COVID-19, labelling it as ‘unproven stuff.’ 

In April 2021, after actor Vivekh suffered a heart attack, Raman attempted to raise concerns about COVID-19 vaccination by suggesting a potential link between the vaccination and the actor’s illness, prompting backlash. He had also tried to raise “concerns” about the COVAXIN vaccine and question its efficacy, despite the vaccine receiving approval from regulatory authorities in India.

As recently as the 22 January 2024 Pran Prathishta event, Sumanth Raman made a post implying that if it had not been for the demolition of Babri Masjid, there wouldn’t be so much fanfare associated with the consecration today. He also said that the celebrations were nothing but, ‘stoking a community into feeling they have got retribution’. 

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Hating Modi Or Hating Hindus? How The Foreign Media Portrayed The Grand Consecration Of Ram Mandir

PM Modi at Ayodhya Ram Mandir
PM Narendra Modi led the Pran Prathishtha for the Ram temple in Ayodhya

The foreign media coverage of the Pran-Prathishtha ceremony in Ayodhya was a spectacle of meltdown, to say the least. Prominent foreign media outlets published poorly researched and biased reports that may lead one to question whether they are unhappy with India’s ruling party or Hindus in general.

It is worth noting that none of these foreign media reports considered the Hindu community’s perspective in their article. Also, they attribute their unverified claims to “critics.”

Here are some examples of how the most popular foreign media brands covered the story of Ram Mandir

British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC)

It didn’t matter to the BBC that the temple came to Hindus after a long-fought legal battle or that beneath the Babri. There was an ancient temple as sacred to us as the Vatican is to Catholics. All they had to say in their report was this:

“Critics have also accused the government of exploiting a religious celebration in a country which – according to its constitution – is secular. For Muslims, India’s biggest minority, the event evoked fear and painful memories, members of the community in Ayodhya told the BBC in the run-up to Monday’s ceremony.”

New York Times (NYT)

In a news article titled “Modi Opens a Giant Temple in a Triumph for India’s Hindu Nationalists,” Mujib Mashal and Hari Kumar write: 

The temple inaugurated by the prime minister is on the disputed site of a centuries-old mosque destroyed in a Hindu mob attack that set a precedent of impunity in cases of violence against Muslims.

In another article titled ‘Why India’s Ram Temple is so Important?,’ Kumar writes that “Islam does not appear in the Ramayana, having arrived in India only 1,000 years ago. But it is cast as the primary villain in the Hindu-nationalist telling of India’s history. Now, with a kind of spiritual and political homecoming for Mr. Modi, the Ram campaigners have the temple they had sought for decades.

Washington Post

Modi’s consecration of controversial Hindu temple caps years-long campaign

Critics feared the state-encouraged religious festivities – and simmering talk of Hindu supremacy and historical vengeance – showed how India under Modi has diverged from the vision of those who struggled for freedom, including Mohandas K. Gandhi, a defender of minority rights who often pleaded for the safety of his Muslim. Compatriots when Hindu-Muslim riots erupted.”

Al Jazeera

India’s Modi opens controversial Hindu temple in Ayodhya

“Analysts and critics see the ceremony as the start of the election campaign for Modi, an avowed Hindu nationalist and one of India’s most consequential leaders who has sought to transform the country from a secular democracy into a distinctly Hindu state in his nearly 10 years in power.

They say the pomp-filled display led by the government shows the extent to which the line between religion and state has eroded under Modi.

Built at an estimated cost of $217m and spread over nearly 3 hectares (7.4 acres), the temple lies atop the debris of the 16th-century Babri mosque, which was razed to the ground in 1992 by Hindu mobs, who believed it was built on temple ruins marking the birthplace of Lord Ram.”

France 24

India’s Modi inaugurates flashpoint temple seen as triumph for Hindu nationalism

Pavni Mittal writes the following:

January 22, 2024 is not merely a date in the calendar but heralds the advent of a new era,” Modi said, speaking outside the temple to the Hindu deity Ram, built on grounds where a mosque stood for centuries before it was torn down in 1992 by Hindu zealots incited by members of his party.

That demolition triggered the worst religious riots since independence – killing 2,000 people, most of them Muslims – and shook the foundations of India’s officially secular political order.”

VOA News

In an article titled Modi Unveils Grand New Temple on Site of Destroyed Mosque, Anjana Pasricha explains how “In December 1992, a huge mob of Hindu right-wing activists used hammers, axes and bare hands to demolish the mosque, sparking nationwide religious riots that killed nearly 2,000 people. It was the worst communal violence witnessed in India since its independence. … In the 1990’s, the campaign to build the temple stirred up Hindu nationalism and catapulted the BJP, which until then was a marginal political party, into a dominant political force.

Time

In India Is Unveiling Its Controversial Temple of Ram. Here’s What to Know, Yasmeen Serhan claims 

For Modi, whose Hindu-nationalist government has overseen a steady rise in violence against Muslims and other religious minorities, the consecration represents the fulfilment of a decade-long pledge to rebuild the temple (the construction of which isn’t due to be completed until December).”

The portal also gave space to Audrey Truschke to write this Hinduphobic piece that calls Lord Rama “a major god and mythological hero, (who) had been born at the very spot on which the mosque stood. ”

CNN

Modi hails a new ‘divine India’ as he inaugurates controversial Hindu temple ahead of nationwide elections

“While millions of Hindus celebrated the opening of the much-awaited complex, which is seen by them as the birthplace of Ram, for the country’s minority Muslim population, it’s a painful reminder of religious divisions they fear are becoming more pronounced under Modi’s BJP government,” wrote Helen Regan and Rhea Mogul.

Guardian

As petals rained down and celebrities beamed, Modi unveiled his vision of a Hindu India

Mukul Kesavan bemoans how “In just over 30 years, India’s political class has travelled from condemning the demolition of the mosque, on the site of which the half-built temple now stands, as an act of sectarian vandalism, to celebrating it as the first act in the re-founding of a hitherto rootless republic. The idol of the infant Ram installed in a temple raised on the site of a razed mosque is to be the icon of this new Hindu nation.

(Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.)

Annamalai Reminds DMK Of The Time When Karunanidhi Advocated for ‘One Nation, One Election’

During the ‘En Mann, En Makkal’ yatra in Villupuram on 27 januaray 2024, Tamil Nadu Bharatiya Janata Party President K. Annamalai, spoke about various factors that affects Tamil Nadu and its people.

In Tamil Nadu, there exists a dichotomy in politics – one for the people and another for the rulers. The children of rulers enjoy the privilege of studying three languages, whereas students in government schools are limited to two languages. Widespread corruption plagues the government, with 11 out of 35 ministers facing ongoing court cases.“, he said.

Annamalai pointed out the disproportionate production distribution, with Chennai, Chengalpattu, Coimbatore, and Kanchipuram districts accounting for 32 percent of domestic production capacity, while Villupuram lags at 2.6 percent. Discussing human development, he noted that Ariyalur ranks lowest, followed by Perambalur, Theni at third, and Villupuram at fourth with a mere 0.561 percent.

Calling for a complete overhaul of politics in Tamil Nadu, Annamalai criticized the DMK and Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi (VCK) for consistently criticizing the central government for any matter. He referenced resolutions passed against the central government in a conference held by these parties, highlighting the similarity with the BJP’s stance on “one country, one election,” as initially advocated by Karunanidhi in Nenjuku Neeti on page 273.

In the book Nenjuku Neethi written by Karunanidhi on page 273, he is the first person in India to voice support for ‘One Nation, One Election’. Today BJP is saying the same”, he said.

He also confronted the criticism about Centre’s allocation of funds, citing the BJP’s efforts to increase state fund allocations, contrasting the figures during the Congress rule in 2004 (30.5 percent) and the subsequent increase under the Modi regime (42 percent). He discussed the allocation for Scheduled Tribes upliftment, pointing out that the state government returned a significant portion to the central government.

Addressing issues like the Vengaivyal incident, cruelty to Scheduled Caste individuals, and the double vase system, Annamalai accused the DMK of prioritizing opposition to the central government over these pressing matters. He criticized the DMK’s focus on succession politics, calling it a threat to democracy, and emphasized the need to save Tamil Nadu.

Finally, Annamalai commented on election promises made by the DMK, noting a significant shortfall in government job creation compared to their commitment.

One Nation One Election (ONOE)

The fundamental concept behind “One Nation, One Election” is to coordinate the scheduling of Lok Sabha and State Assembly elections across all states, aiming to decrease the frequency of polls nationwide. This approach was a common practice until 1967 but experienced disruptions due to factors like defections, dismissals, and government dissolutions. The continuity of synchronized elections was initially broken in 1959 when the Centre utilized Article 356 to dismiss the government in Kerala.

Currently, certain states, including Arunachal Pradesh, Sikkim, Andhra Pradesh, and Odisha, conduct assembly polls concurrently with the Lok Sabha elections. The proposal for simultaneous elections was introduced in 1999 by the Law Commission, led by BP Jeevan Reddy.

Advantages of Implementing ONOE is Streamlined Governance, Consistency in Policy Decisions, Cost-Efficiency in Elections, Minimized Deployment of Security Forces, Prevention of Horse Trading, Reduction of Freebies and Improved State Finances.

Frequent elections contribute to political corruption, due to the substantial funds required for each election. Holding simultaneous elections can significantly reduce election expenses for political parties, eliminating the need for repetitive fundraising. During the 2019 Lok Sabha Elections alone, an estimated Rs 60,000 Crores were spent. Simultaneous elections would also lead to reduced expenses for the Election Commission (EC), provided initial infrastructure investments are made.

(Inputs with Hindu Tamil)

 Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Tamil Nadu Chief Minister MK Stalin’s Spain Trip Raises Questions

Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu M K Stalin ventured on a journey to Spain on 27 January 2024, to participate in an investors’ meeting aimed at attracting increased foreign investments to the State. The duration of the trip is eight days, expected to return on 7 February. 

However, what has raised eyebrows is the list of people accompanying him.

According to information that is doing the rounds on social media, MK Stalin is accompanied by his wife Durgavathy Stalin, his personal secretary Dinesh Kumar, personal securities – Selvaraju and Nitin John. Industries Minister TRB Rajaa and his PA Ayyappan and one Shreyas, and a senior delegate at Industries Department are also joining him. The officers going on the trip include: Umanath IAS (personal secretary to the Chief Minister, Senthilvelan IPS, Inspector Vivekanandhan, and Balaganesan of the ‘Core cell of TN, and Vishnu IAS’ and Vishnu IAS, MD & CEO of Guidance Tamil Nadu.

While addressing the media at Chennai airport, he emphasized the anticipation of numerous investors, companies, and entrepreneurs participating in the event. He highlighted the government’s persistent efforts to achieve a targeted $1 trillion economy set at 20230, considering the recent GIM2024 as a promising start. He expressed his commitment to apprise investors of the state’s infrastructure, human resources, and investment landscape, asserting Tamil Nadu’s status as the most conducive state in the country for investment.

The Chief Minister disclosed plans for direct discussions with prominent companies like ROCA and Gestamp, as well as engaging with investment agencies such as Invest Spain, intending to generate revenue and employment opportunities. He conveyed optimism that the trip would successfully attract foreign investment from European countries, citing earlier Memoranda of Understanding (MoUs) amounting to ₹7,442 crore and 17,000 jobs resulting from his visits to Singapore, Japan, and the UAE. Notable companies, including Omron and Mitsubishi Motors, have already commenced establishing their operations in the state, with Lulu Group initiating a project in Coimbatore.

While the Chief Minister expressed confidence in his journey to Spain to attract investments, political commentator and YouTuber Savukku Shankar raised questions about the true intentions behind the trip.

Initially he inquired about the companies Chief Minister planning to meet during his visit to Spain and was skeptical about the purpose of spending eight days to engage with entrepreneurs. He urged to release the trip details visit London, Australia, and America.

When the news outlet affiliated with DMK, Sun News, propagated a false narrative suggesting that Stalin was planning a global investors’ meet in Spain, he derided the media and tasked the Tamil Nadu “Fact Checking Unit”, led by Iyan Karthikeyan, to probe into the matter.

 

He also raised doubts about Spain’s ongoing economic challenges since the pandemic and questioned the feasibility of attracting investments for Tamil Nadu under such circumstances. He quoted in the statement “we anticipate a deceleration in GDP growth, decreasing from 5.8% in 2022 to 2.3% this year and further to 1.4% in the subsequent year. While this represents a subdued growth rate for 2024 in comparison to the pre-pandemic era, it remains significantly above the average growth rate observed in the eurozone”.

On 24 August 2019, Stalin questioned, “Is Chief Minister Edappadi Palaniswami going abroad to attract investments for Tamil Nadu, or is he seeking investments for himself?” Referring to his previous statement, Shankar emphasized, “Listen carefully. He’s gone once; you are next to Modi.” Pointing out that the Chief Minister had undertaken multiple foreign trips, positioning himself as the second only to Modi in terms of international visits.

Upon reflecting on his earlier visit to Dubai, which he elucidated during the airport briefing with reporters, Stalin highlighted the significant impact of his trips to Singapore, Japan, and the UAE. He pointed out the existence of Memoranda of Understanding (MoUs) that totaled ₹7,442 crore and contributed to the creation of 17,000 jobs. In response to this information, Shankar requested the issuance of a white paper on the subject.

 

 Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

 

Understanding Powers And Responsibilities Of A Governor

Amid a recent deterioration in the law and order situation in Kerala, a clash ensued between the Governor of Kerala Arif Mohammed Khan, and the Student Federation of India, a student wing of the ruling Communist Party of India (Marxist), who was staging a protest in Kollam. The protesters blocked the governor’s car and allegedly attempted to attack him. In response to this unsettling situation, Governor Arif Mohammed Khan staged a roadside protest to express his dissatisfaction

The situation unfolded as the governor was en route to Kottarakkara to inaugurate the centenary celebration of an ashram, with activists from the Students’ Federation of India (SFI) at Nilamel College gathering along the roadside, chanting slogans. The governor withdrew the protest following the registration of a case against the protestors. In response to this development, the Union Home Ministry has opted to grant Z+ security to the Governor and the Kerala Raj Bhavan.

In Tamil Nadu too, the DMK government has been at logger heads with the Governor. In the recent DMK Youth Wing conference held at Salem, Udhayanidhi Stalin passed a resolution calling for the removal of Governor like removing the extra growth in our bodies.

At the backdrop of this let’s see why there is a governor for a state.

The Constitution of India (COI) has established a parliamentary system of government in which the President and Governors serve as nominal executives. This arrangement aims to ensure that a nonpartisan individual takes charge of the government’s reins in times when the essence of democracy fails.

The current structure of the governor’s office is derived from the Government of India Act 1935. While the COI may not extensively delineate every power of the governor, a comprehension of their role and functions reveals their significance.

Though the role of the Governor is quite similar to that of the President of India in certain instances he has more powers at his situational discretion.

Article 153, stipulates that there must be a Governor appointed for each state, allowing for the possibility of a single individual serving as the Governor for multiple states.

Article 155, states that the President is responsible for appointing the Governor of a State through a warrant issued under the President’s hand and seal.

Article 156, declares that the Governor holds office at the pleasure of the President, indicating the discretionary nature of the gubernatorial appointment.

Article 161, grants the Governor the power to provide pardons, reprieves, respites, or remissions of punishment, and to suspend, remit, or commute sentences in matters of crime where the state legislature holds the authority to enact laws.

Article 163, outlines the discretionary powers of the Governor, encompassing scenarios such as appointing a chief minister when no party secures a clear majority in the state legislative assembly, responding to no-confidence motions, dealing with the failure of constitutional machinery in the State, and the authority to withhold assent to a Bill, reserving it for the consideration of the President.

Article 356, pertains to situations where a state government is unable to operate under constitutional provisions, enabling the Central government to assume direct control over the state machinery. The state’s governor issues a proclamation, obtaining the consent of the President of India.

Article 357, addresses the exercise of legislative powers under a proclamation issued by the Central government under Article 356.

Article 361, ensures that the Governor of a State is not held accountable to any court for the exercise and performance of their powers and duties.

Let’s dig deeper into the matter to realize the functions of the Governor.

Initially, in terms of executive functions, Article 154 of the Constitution of India (COI) vests the Governor with the state’s executive power. All official transactions are conducted in the Governor’s name with the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers (COM). This involves crucial appointments such as those of the Council of Ministers, Chief Ministers, Advocate General, State Election Commissioner, State Public Service Commission Chairman and members, and Vice Chancellors, among others. The Governor, within defined limits, also recommends the imposition of an emergency and wields extensive powers as the agent of the President (a practice that ceased after the Congress era).

Moving on to legislative powers, as an integral part of the state legislature, the Governor is responsible for summoning and dissolving sessions, sending messages to houses regarding bills, and delivering an annual address. In the case of a State Legislative Council, the Governor nominates special representatives, decides disqualifications in consultation with the Election Commission, and can promulgate ordinances when the Legislative Assembly is not in session.

The Governor’s veto powers constitute a crucial aspect, allowing the approval, withholding, or return of a bill. In special circumstances, the Governor may forward a bill to the President for consideration if it is deemed ultra vires to the COI, poses a threat to the directive principles of state policy, goes against the country’s larger interests, or involves compulsory acquisition of property. This serves the purpose of preventing hastily crafted and unconstitutional legislation, ensuring additional checks and balances.

Financial powers grant the Governor authority over money bills and demands for grants, requiring prior permission for their introduction. The annual budget must be laid before the Governor in the State Legislative Assembly (SLA), and contingency funds can only be accessed with the Governor’s approval.

Lastly, the Governor’s judiciary powers involve consultation with the President on the appointment of High Court judges, the appointment and promotion of district judges, and the granting of pardons within the state’s jurisdiction. Notably, the pardoning power is independent of the judiciary, serving as an executive power to correct any judicial errors and provide relief from unduly harsh sentences.

The COI outlines two distinctive discretions for the Governor: constitutional discretion and situational discretion. Constitutional discretion allows the Governor to act independently on specific matters where the validity of the discretion cannot be questioned in any court. This includes the reservation of bills to the President, recommending the President’s rule, seeking information from the Chief Minister on administration and legislative matters, exercising powers as the administrator of adjoining Union Territories, and determining royalty amounts for tribal districts.

Situational discretion, without the aid and advice of the COM, comes into play during the appointment of a Chief Minister when no party has a clear majority in the SLA or when a Chief Minister dies without a successor. It also applies to the dismissal of the COM when they fail to prove confidence in the floor and the dissolution of the SLA when the COM loses its majority. In such situations, the Governor can exercise discretion independently. This stands in contrast to the President, whose discretion is bound by the advice of the COM as per the 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act of 1976.

In conclusion, the position of the Governor is a highly esteemed role that carries a significant sense of responsibility. Rather than engaging in conflicts, state governments and Raj Bhavan should collaborate for the betterment of the people, ensuring the prosperity of citizens and, ultimately, the nation of Bharath.

Satheesh is a freelance writer.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Deliberately-Stuffed Debris, Blocked Entrances: What The ASI Encountered In Gyanvapi Survey

Debris blocking access to temple in Gyanvapi
ASI Gyanvapi report mentions how debris were deliberatly filled to block access.

Chambers in the destroyed temple beneath Aurangzeb’s construction in Gyanvapi were intentionally filled with debris to block Hindus’ access and eliminate any hope they may have to worship there. The Archeological Survey of India (ASI) said in its report to the court after surveying the disputed site in Varanasi that holes were made in the ceilings of these cellars to fill them up with debris. It also said that the entrances to these cellars and other chambers of the temple were blocked by placing stone slabs.

The full ASI report, which The Commune Magazine accessed, confirms that there was a temple that was destroyed and its materials reused to build a mosque in its place. On January 25, the lawyer representing the Hindu side, Vishnu Shankar Jain, revealed it partially in a press conference.

“All the four entrances of Cellar S3, in its eastern wall, were blocked by filling soil or keeping stones and architectural members. Two of these entrances were opened to enter cells of S3 for examining the cellar. On entering into these cells it was noticed that they were deliberately filled with soil and debris by making a hole in their ceilings. The debris was filled in from these holes, and entrances were blocked temporarily by putting stone slabs, architectural members, etc,” the report said.

The report also said this debris was a significant hindrance “in any scientific investigation/ survey.”

The amassed debris posed a significant obstacle, obscuring the study area and impeding scientific exploration. Notably, the report mentions that entrances to several chambers, including the central chamber of the temple, were sealed by stone masonry.

“The western entrance of the southern chamber of the pre-existing structure has also been blocked and converted into an arrow staircase to climb to the roof. Its entrance from the southwest side has been blocked by stone masonry, but one can still enter them from the roof.”

Clearing debris from the surface during the excavation process presented a series of challenges. The team discovered that two cellars were intentionally blocked with debris, and the entrances were obstructed.

The study area was obscured by accumulation of large quantities of debris on all sides. The accumulated debris was a big hindrance in any scientific investigation/ survey and getting meaningful results from them.

However, when the debris was successfully removed, several artefacts were unearthed, including a Shivling, a miniature temple, and other significant finds.

The team also had to utilise household and garden equipment for debris removal after seeking the agreement of the involved parties. Yet, the challenge of debris disposal intensified due to limited open spaces within the fenced area.

“The disposal of debris removed from the surface was another inherent issue. Since the open spaces within the fenced area are very few and every part needs to be cleaned, the issue of debris disposal was created. The district administration was approached to earmark spaces adjoining the fence to the west and east so that debris could be removed from the fenced area.”

However, challenges in the east necessitated the creation of a funnel-shaped receptacle with a channel for efficient debris removal, especially due to the absence of a gate.

The ASI reported that the High Court directive to limit the Gyanvapi survey investigation to surface study without excavation added another layer of complexity. The sensitive nature of the case also led to widespread media coverage of the survey team and its day-to-day activities. Though the media did not have access to the area under investigation or its neighbouring area, the team worked under constant media glare.

However, the judiciary intervened in the matter and forbade any press reporting on the team’s daily activities,” the report said.

Security check posts and narrow passages further complicated swift movement around the site, requiring labour-intensive measures for load transfer.

The cellars below the open platform had localised ambient weather conditions. The south cellars, similar to the north cellars, had only one entrance to the south. There were no light and no electricity connections in either of them.

The Gyanvapi survey team battled adverse weather conditions, ranging from scorching sun and high temperatures to monsoon-induced humidity. Dark and humid cellars lacking electricity initially posed challenges, but the team adapted by using torch lights and reflectors. Protective measures against rainwater and muddy slush were devised, though they impacted work speed.

South cellar, in particular, was full of discarded materials of various kinds, which made even stepping onto the surface a difficult task. For the first few days, the team worked in the cellars with torch lights and reflectors to illuminate the interior. The humidity within the cellars was much higher than on the outside. The lack of air circulation within was another issue. Since the north cellars were under lock and key, the humidity level within them was comparatively higher than in the south.

Modifying vacant security check posts within the fenced area addressed storage challenges for equipment, tools, and materials. As the local administration suggested, a camp office within the temple complex served as a storage hub and a resting area during breaks.

With the onset of monsoons, preventing the accumulation of rainwater and run of muddy slush was a significant issue. The use of tirpal was made to protect the exposed structures after debris cleaning and prevent the accumulation of water in open areas. The water-sogged debris would present another challenge, along with the slippery surface. Work speed was affected considerably,” the report said.

The persistent threat of monkeys added another layer of complexity, disrupting movement and the work area, particularly during monsoons when they tore up trails after the day’s work.

Despite these challenges, the team adhered to the court’s directives. They conducted a systematic scientific investigation and survey, meticulously documenting Settlement Plot No. 9130.

The incredible tale of how the Archaeological Survey of India triumphed over many challenges to carry out and present the court-mandated survey on Gyanvapi is genuinely awe-inspiring. It merits the gratitude of the Hindu community. Despite facing arduous working conditions and harsh weather at the disputed site, the team’s unwavering dedication ensured no obstacle hindered their efficiency.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“I Paid ₹1 Cr In Liquid Cash”: Annamalai Releases Third Audio Clip Of DMK Files 3 Showing DMK’s Deception, DMK MP A. Raja And Jaffar Sait Discuss Diary And Payments Made

The TN BJP Chief Annamalai has been releasing a series of audio recordings of conversations between DMK top brass and the ex-TN intelligence chief Jaffar Sait. The latest audio clip is the third in the series, released this evening. The audio clip features the conversation between DMK MP A. Raja and Jaffar Sait. In this clip, the discussion revolves around how the CBI enquiry with A. Raja went and how he successfully thwarted the questions from them. A. Raja also elaborates about the payments he made to the party for different purposes and different people. The conversation clarifies it that the then CM was also aware about the investigations and was updated every day by Jaffar Sait on the progress. The transcript of the conversation is given below.

A. Raja: Hello

Jaffar Sait: Sir vanakkam, how did it go sir?

A. Raja: It is done sir

JS: How did it go today, sir?

A. Raja: They asked about the diary, I told an alternative theory for that. 

JS: OK sir

A. Raja: I took three documents along with me. They were upset upon seeing it. 

JS: What documents, sir?

A. Raja: We opened an account in Canara bank in the name of the district DMK. We have dealt up to ₹1 Crore (in that account)

JS: OK sir

A. Raja: From 2003 to 2008

JS: OK sir

A. Raja: Similarly, I have bills in the name of “Murasoli” for ₹ 70 to 80 lacs. Also, I gave one-page advertisement for ‘thalaivar’s’ birthday

JS: OK sir

A. Raja: For that, I had paid ₹1 crore in one payment as liquid cash

JS: OK sir

A. Raja: I have these three to show that through bank account or cash dealings I have collected money from either the public or people I know and given it to the district units… I have it as liquid cash as well as bank deposits. So that they can draw identical inference for the diaries…. I have done these transactions with EV Velu, Geetha Jeevan, Ponmudi, Velu….it was told that it was given to Ponmudi for Villupuram rally…Villupuram, EV Velu then KC Palanisamy (inaudible)…

JS: Oh, OK sir, OK sir

A. Raja: So, maximum it has been done for the party, either I would have given it in advance or given it after they had made expenses…but in one place it is mentioned as Trichy rally… It would be mentioned as Trichy conference…the entries in the entire page are for Trichy conference… I am one of the co-district secretaries for the conference…

JS: OK sir

A. Raja: There are 3 or 4 documents for the alternative theory….they know the diary is not relevant, but they wanted to demoralise me by making it relevant…

JS: OK sir

A. Raja: (inaudible)…like that

JS: OK sir

A. Raja: That is over. I had explained the first come first serve policy. I had told them about the 2001 auction rate. At some place in Delhi, they said (spectrum) should have been given to Tata, but you did not give to Tata (inaudible). Only in that place there was a little hiccup. 

JS: Yesterday, you said something like Tata did not want it, sir….

A. Raja: What I am saying is they did not press me, but they didn’t want it, and they asked me to put on hold. What they are saying is, even if Tata asked you to put on hold, why didn’t you do your job?

JS: Which year was it given, sir?

A. Raja: It was given in 2008 sir (inaudible) but he (Tata) didn’t insist it, but he went to another plan, then he changed it. What am I supposed to say?

JS: CM asked this morning. I told him everything went well, I told him whatever you told me. He asked about today. I said they have gone today, and we can finish it by forenoon. I will talk to him now. 

A. Raja: (inaudible) you are on a different cell(phone) right?

JS: I will come sir, I will call you back. 

Although the audio clips have shocked many, DMK and the Tamil mainstream media seem to be unperturbed. DMK has not commented anything about the audio clips and avoids the topic when reporters ask about it. Without condoning or condemning, the party members are maintaining a Stoic silence which they seem to have mastered over the years. The links to tapes 1 and 2 are given below.

 Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

“Annamalai Is An Extremist, Paradesi”: How DMK Propagandists ‘The Hindu’ N. Ram And ‘Nakkheeran’ Gopal Spewed Venom And Exhibited Anti-Democratic Attitude

Journalists and representatives from various journalist associations expressed their dissent over Tamil Nadu BJP president K Annamalai’s alleged derogatory remarks towards them. The protest, held at Valluvar Kottam in Chennai on 25 January 2024, was triggered by Annamalai’s comments directed at senior television journalist Karthigaichelvan of News 18 Tamil Nadu.

This arose as Annamalai shared his opinion that DMK scion and Minister Udhayanidhi  Stalin wasn’t subjected to challenging questions during an interaction and compared it to a friendly match. However, his use of a colloquial Tamil term to convey this opinion was perceived as derogatory by certain journalists. Despite the controversy, Annamalai declined to apologize for his language, and in response to a protest by journalists, he issued a statement cum video explaining that the ‘first layer of the ‘DMK onion’ had been activated.

N. Ram’s Anti-Democratic Elitism

During the meeting, N Ram, Director of The Hindu Group, urged journalists to unite and create a “minimum common program” against Annamalai. He suggested that criminal proceedings should be initiated against Annamalai, describing him as a repeated offender with a motive. Ram emphasized that only Karthigaichelvan could initiate this. Further, Ram advocated not giving publicity to Annamalai, labeling him as an extremist who should be deprived of oxygen (publicity). Ram aligned himself with the ruling dmk government’s stance, highlighting his previous publications in newspapers and articles, showering adulations for the late DMK patriarch Karunanidhi.

 

Nakkheeran Gopal’s Third-Rated Speech

Nakkheeran Editor R Gopal during the speech called Annamalai as ‘Paradesi’ (a casteist slur word that denotes a wastrel or wanderer), goat, and suggested his media team use beep instead of his name and decided to boycott Annamalai. Finally, he requested all media organizations to boycott him like his organization saying this was an attempt to ‘divide and rule’ policy.

Our editorial team has decided that from here one we shouldn’t write about “goat” (referring to Annamalai).” and goes on to show the cover image of the last issue of his magazine in which Annamalai’s depicted derogatorily.

Now also our folks are recording a video. Now you’ve mentioned that paradesi’s name. I’m now thinking how to remove that name. Because we’ve decided that his name should not come. Then people will come and mock saying you’ve put his name. So, I’ve to tell them to put beep.”, he said.

R Gopal has been vocal in supporting the DMK government and has consistently dedicated himself to promoting fake news and Hindu hatred on numerous occasions to bolster the DMK.

The True Face Of The DMK Stooges

Malini Parthasarathy, former Chairperson and Editor at The Hindu upon resigning from her position at the publishing group, attributed her decision to the shrinking space for her editorial perspectives. She mentioned her ongoing efforts to free The Hindu’s narrative from deeply ingrained ideological biases and voiced apprehensions about the diminishing opportunities for her initiatives in recent times, leading her to make the challenging decision to step down.

Earlier during the aftermath of Cyclone Michaung television reports extensively covered the significant damage in affected regions. In contrast, print media The Hindu overlooked the challenges faced by Chennai and published news about Parliament proceedings and an honor killing on the state of its front page covering the government’s mismanagement.

In another instance The Hindu published an article titled “Not clear if Sengol was presented to Mountbatten, says Thiruvavaduthurai Adheenam head,” quoting the Adheenam pontiff questioning the significance of presenting the Sengol to Lord Mountbatten since he was leaving India and handing over powers. The article suggested a lack of evidence supporting Mountbatten and Rajaji’s involvement in the power transfer during the Sengol event. This information became fodder for the Congress to criticize the Modi Government for celebrating the Sengol. the Adheenam head’s agreement when it was pointed out that there was no evidence indicating the scepter as a symbol of the “transfer of power” and issued a statement after some time only when Senior Congress leader Jairam Ramesh claimed that the Sengol, symbolizing the transfer of power from the British to India’s first Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru, the issue debunked.

Not only The Hindu but also the employees were seen to spread hatred of Hindu gods when Hindustan Times journalists tweeted about the Hindu God Krishna sparked a series of mocking comments about Hindu Gods from journalists at The Wire and The Hindu. Suprakash Majumdar, a freelance journalist with The Wire, tweeted suggesting that “Lord Hanuman had a gay crush on Lord Rama,” followed by a question asking for others’ opinions on the matter. In response, a journalist named Suchitra from The Hindu mocked the sentiment, suggesting that Hindus would now claim to be the most tolerant religion, and urged Majumdar not to provide them with ‘ammunition.’

He has also faced criticism for allegedly pursuing a biased agenda in his reporting under the guise of journalism. Various individuals have called out the newspaper for engaging in partisan reporting, spreading misleading information, and using doctored images in coverage of the Rafale deal. The Hindu’s Frontline, published an “exclusive interview” with Moussa Abu Marzouk, the head of Hamas’ international relations office in Doha, Qatar, raising concerns about the outlet’s credibility.

Previously during COVID, The Hindu published an article with the headline “India’s COVID-19 scenario very very difficult, says Danish Prime Minister,” suggesting deep concern from Denmark regarding the COVID-19 situation in India. However, the Danish Prime Minister had merely acknowledged the challenges India faces in controlling the pandemic, stating, “The situation is very very difficult for you.” Denmark’s Ambassador to India, H. E. Freddy Svane, responded by calling out The Hindu’s news as twisted and untrue, clarifying the misrepresentation of the Danish Prime Minister’s statement.

Earlier, amidst the COVID-19 pandemic, The Hindu released an article with the title “India’s COVID-19 scenario very very difficult, says Danish Prime Minister,” implying significant worry from Denmark regarding India’s COVID-19 situation. However, Denmark’s Ambassador to India, H. E. Freddy Svane, denounced The Hindu’s report as distorted and false. He clarified the misrepresentation of the Danish Prime Minister’s statement in response to the article.

The newspaper has earlier faced accusations of disseminating false information, anti-Hindu propaganda and left-leaning ideologies marking a departure from its once impartial journalistic reputation. Under its current directorship, it openly promotes a narrative opposing the principles of freedom of speech and expression.

The articles in Nakkheeran were criticized previously for being a source of misinformation targeting migrant workers. Previously, Nakkheeran’s articles faced criticism for disseminating misinformation, particularly targeting migrant workers. One notable instance involves a misunderstanding regarding Uttar Bharat Bhavan, inaccurately portraying it as a refuge for migrant workers. Contrary to this portrayal, the Bhavan functions as a hub for individuals from North India, similar to Tamil Nadu House or Puducherry House in New Delhi for residents of those respective regions. The articles also contained inaccuracies about the e-SHRAM card, falsely implying that it provides ration cards and voter IDs to cardholders. In reality, the e-SHRAM card serves as a centralized database, offering social security benefits to workers in the unorganized sector. Launched by the Modi government in 2021, the e-SHRAM scheme has garnered 28.6 crore sign-ups since its inception.

Additionally, a video associated with Nakkheeran falsely claims that the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission (TNPSC) permits candidates from other states to obtain jobs in Tamil Nadu’s public service.

In 2018, Nakkheeran Gopal published a story in his magazine casting aspersions on former Tamil Nadu Governor Banwarilal Purohit linking him with a sex scandal that happened in Madurai Kamaraj University at the behest of one Nirmala Devi. He was apprehended and subsequently released for charges of defamation, Notably the DMK came to his aid and condemned the ruling ADMK government under the guise of supporting freedom of expression.

Gopal had linked Tamilnadu BJP leader H. Raja with the Principal of the Sakthi International School where a class 12 student died under mysterious circumstances. Raja came down heavy on Nakkheeran Gopal calling him a ‘mini Mallya’ taking a jibe at his non-repayment of the loan.

DMK’s Henchmen

Whenever the DMK holds authority and faces significant criticism it cannot tolerate, a sequence of crackdowns ensues targeting political activists, journalists, and social media participants who openly oppose the DMK and the Dravidian ideology. These actions are often carried out either under the guise of police measures or through individuals associated with the DMK, referred to as B-teams, D-Stocks, or purportedly sympathetic journalists.

Let’s start with Dravidianist supporter journalist Kathigaichelvan, Editor of News18 Tamil, in which the entire narrative started. He received negative criticism for soft questions that were asked to the DMK scion Udhayanidhi Stalin and a few years ago, he had interviewed MK Stalin in a similar fashion which also drew the ire of the public for not asking pointed questions. The father-son duo both had similar questions including fitness, campaigns, how he prepares himself, Do they have time for it, etc.

Senthil Vel who portraying himself as an ‘unbiased’ journalist currently hosted the second Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) Youth Wing Conference held at Salem, was implicated in spreading false information and promoting caste-based discord. He falsely asserted that the accused teacher, linked to a sexual harassment case, belonged to the ‘Iyer’ caste, thereby perpetuating the dissemination of misleading details. It is worth noting that Maridhas, a popular vlogger, had previously accused Senthil of favoring a specific ideology and political party. News 18 Tamil Nadu decided to part ways with him in light of these allegations.

BR Aravindakashan from Sathiyam News, a Dravidian stockist journalist echoed similar partial truths endorsed by the DMK Minister. He went on to suggest that the Central government was seeking retribution against the Tamil people by providing fewer funds to Tamil Nadu. However, vigilant netizens promptly pointed out the flaw in the Minister’s argument, highlighting that the Khelo India scheme operates on demand, and since the Tamil Nadu government did not request funds from the Central Government, it received a proportionally smaller share of the overall allocated funds.

During the widespread flooding in Chennai, D-stocks attempted to support their narrative but faced criticism from netizens. In a particular incident, Aadhan Tamil journalist Madhesh wrote, “Chennai has flooded for one day rain. Commuters are suffering,” only to later delete the post for reasons unknown. Several users speculated that the journalist removed the tweet due to his perceived support for the DMK.

In another controversy, Tamil Nadu conferred the Kottai Ameer Communal Harmony Award on Mohammed Zubair of Alt News for “rendering various services to promote communal harmony”. But Zubair has a track record of disseminating false information and promoting propaganda against Hindus. He was responsible for sharing an edited clip of former BJP leader Nupur Sharma’s statements, resulting in the widespread chanting of ‘Sar Tan Se Juda’ slogans in various parts of the country and violent attacks against Nupur Sharma. This misinformation campaign also led to the tragic deaths of several innocent Hindus who had expressed support for Nupur Sharma. Additionally, Zubair operated a Facebook page named “Unofficial Sususwamy,” where he engaged in mockery and ridicule of Hindu deities and symbols. He later deleted this Facebook account and removed certain controversial tweets that were perceived as offensive to Hindu sentiments.

Finally, Iyan Karthikeyan who heads Fact Checking Unit (FCU) was under the administrative purview of Special Programme Implementation. The state government opted to establish a dedicated Social Media Monitoring Centre within the police department, to combat fake news and misinformation on social media platforms. Instead, it established a Fact Checking Unit (FCU) under the administrative purview of Special Programme Implementation, which was given to Iyan Karthikeyan, a YouTuber associated with Dravidian ideologies and recognized for promoting DMK propaganda.

 Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

“Not Pleased By Jai Shri Ram Kolams On Jan 22”: TN Cong Leader Posts Video Of Husband’s Rant On Ram Mandir Celebrations

Tamil Nadu Congress General Secretary Lakshmi Ramachandran today drew sharp criticism online after posting a video of her husband criticising his neighbours for celebrating the Pran-Prathishtha ceremony in Ayodhya.

Interestingly, she disclosed the person’s identity only when specifically asked by a netizen. Superficially, the video gives the impression that a common man gave the speech without any political agenda.

In the 4:47-minute video, Ramachandran’s husband, Swaminathan, addresses community members during a Republic Day celebration. He tells the Hindus who celebrated the Pran-Prathishtha of Lord Ram in Ayodhya’s temple on January 22, stating that they “really irked” and “bothered” him.

“There has to be something that stops us from celebrating divisive things, such as what happened on Jan 22,” Swaminathan says in the video. “I saw calls of Jai Sri Ram on Kolam designs that day. And I was not pleased.”

 

He also tells the Hindu residents not to pass on their “wrong values” to their children. “That’s why I am talking to children mainly. We want to look at the future and I hope our children do not take the wrong lessons from what we do. Even though we might do it to the best of intentions. I am not questioning intentions here. But there has to be something that stops us from celebrating divisive things, that is, such as what happened on Jan 22.”

While he asserts he has no issue celebrating festivals like Diwali, Eid, and Christmas, Swaminathan argues that “we should really think twice before celebrating something like that (Pran-Prathishtha)”. He claims to be speaking on behalf of “Muslim friends in the community, as well as a few minorities who are not happy with that event.”

Ramachandran shared the video on her social media with the caption, “A speech delivered in our residential community’s Republic Day celebrations! Long live Secular Indian Republic!”. The primary tweet does not mention her relationship with the speaker. An impressionable reader may be misled to believe that this speech reflects the opinions and sentiments of society.

When a netizen flatteringly asked Ramachandran, “Wow…who is he ? TV actor ?”, she introduced Swaminathan as “Tamil Medai nadaga nadigar” (meaning “actor on the Tamil stage”) and her husband of 20 years.

Swaminathan also justifies his stance by referencing his acting career and familiarity with religious texts. He says he played the roles of Manikavasagar, Ramanujan, and Aurangazeb on stage. He also talks about his knowledge of holy texts, claiming to know verses from the Quran, Thiruvasagam, and Diva Pramandam.

“There is beauty in celebrating events together,” Swaminathan says. “But not that event because many of the children may not know this. But some of us who were there in 1992 know very well how this all started. In what kind of divisive way this started. Some of you might want me to go back 400 years. Well, I don’t want to look at history like that.”

The video has sparked widespread condemnation online, with many criticising Swaminathan’s remarks as insensitive and divisive.

This video drew hundreds of comments in criticism. Some of them are as follows:

https://twitter.com/Bharath12450842/status/1750939593694978327

https://twitter.com/Bharath12450842/status/1750939593694978327?s=20

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Kerala Governor Stages Sudden Wayside Sit-in Protest Seeking Arrest Of SFI Members

Kerala Guv resists SFI attacks
Kerala Guv staged a sudden roadside sit-in protest against SFI activists.

Kerala Governor Arif Mohammed Khan took an unusual step to express his displeasure with the Students’ Federation of India (SFI) activists who allegedly attacked his car during a protest against him. Khan boldly got out of his vehicle and sat in front of a wayside shop on the busy MC Road, demanding the arrest of the activists that he claimed were being protected by the police.

The Governor left the roadside tea shop after an hour when the police registered a case against the protesters affiliated with the ruling CPI(M) party. The SFI members were staging a black-flag protest against Khan, who was on way to attend a function at an Aashram near Kottarakkara.

“I am not upset about the black flag protest. But I was worried when they hit my vehicle,” he reportedly said.

Khan confronted the SFI activists and subsequently took a chair from a nearby shop and sat down, refusing to move until the agitators were arrested.

“I will not leave from here. Police are giving them protection,” Khan is seen angrily telling onlookers.

https://twitter.com/MahaRathii/status/1751140680544505894?s=20

The standoff continued for some time, with a large crowd gathering at the spot, including police officials and local residents.

“If the police are the ones breaking the law, who is going to uphold the law,” he asked the policemen.

This latest incident is a fresh addition to the ongoing tussle between Khan and the Left government in the state, which has been marked by disagreements over various issues, particularly the functioning of universities in the state and Khan’s refusal to sign specific bills passed by the assembly. 

The tension peaked earlier this week when Khan abruptly ended his customary policy address to the Kerala Assembly after just two minutes amidst protests from the ruling party MLAs.

The SFI has been at the forefront of protests against Khan, accusing him of using his authority as Chancellor of universities in the state to appoint nominees of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) to key positions in universities.

Khan has denied these allegations.

(Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.)