Home Blog

“Cannibal, Fanatic, Fascist”: Congress-DMK Ally VCK Functionary Abuses PM Modi

“Cannibal, Dog, Fascist”: VCK Functionary Abuses PM Modi

A speech delivered by a functionary of the Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi (VCK) during a memorial event in Kumbakonam has sparked controversy after a video of the remarks went viral on social media.

The event was reportedly held in front of the Thirumangalakkudi mosque near Kumbakonam to commemorate those killed in the ongoing Iran war. According to local reports, the gathering took place without prior permission from authorities. During the event, Amudhan Duraiarasan delivered a speech in which he made a series of remarks targeting Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

In his speech, Duraiarasan said: “The people who are ruling the world today, the world has fallen into the hands of people who behave like religious fanatics and like savage animals. Because of them, the world is getting shattered and destroyed today.
A destructive cannibalistic fanatic, Narendra Modi, is ruling India in the same way. No less than him, another cannibalistic fanatic, a mentally ill man and the peak of madness, is ruling another country, that is Donald Trump.”

He continued, “Beyond being a destructive cannibalistic fanatic, this Trump is a terrible human being who finds pleasure in killing people here. And Narendra Modi, a destructive man who survives by depending on America and Israel – there are no leaders in this world who question him. A great leader who questioned such a cannibalistic fanatic was Saddam Hussein.”

Duraiarasan further alleged: “This Narendra Modi will never stand for us. He is a fascist terrorist. He is against Muslims. He is against Dalits. But it is important to understand how the masses are viewing this struggle. How did Narendra Modi become the Prime Minister of this country? Before him there was Advani.”

He also claimed that foreign powers had influenced Modi’s rise to power: “But powerful nations sidelined Advani and planned that Narendra Modi should become the Prime Minister of India.
Countries of dominance like America and Israel planned that Narendra Modi should become the Prime Minister. Why did they plan this? Because in Gujarat, in the Godhra train incident, this destructive cannibalistic fanatic Narendra Modi blew up the train and burned alive thousands of our Muslim brethren.”

Referring to a past media interview, Duraiarasan said: “At that time, when Narendra Modi was asked in an interview by the newspaper Reuters, that destructive Narendra Modi, that dog said: ‘You are travelling in a vehicle. What is your response to the riots that happened in Gujarat? Do you regret it?’ the journalist asked.”

He added: “Then this destructive Narendra Modi – the cannibalistic fanatic, the fascist terrorist who is ruling this country today said: ‘If you are travelling in a vehicle and a dog suddenly comes under the vehicle and dies, wouldn’t you feel sad?’ Thus, this destructive Narendra Modi, who compared the Muslim minority people of this country to a dog, is ruling the nation today.”

In the concluding part of his speech, he stated: “If today this destructive cannibalistic fanatic, fascist terrorist Narendra Modi has become the Prime Minister of this country, then the one who gave that opportunity to this dog was Bahadur Shah, the Islamic emperor who once ruled this country. The real owners of this land are the people here.”

The video of the speech circulated widely across social media platforms following the event.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Custodial Deaths, A Never-Ending Saga In DMK-Ruled Dravidian Model Tamil Nadu

The state of Tamil Nadu under Dravidian Model was rocked by another custodial death just as the news of the Ajith Kumar custodial death case cools down. The 5 years of Dravidian model governance has left law and order in TN in a state of alarm.

Let’s take a look at some the documented incidents of death due to police torture that deserve as much traction as that of the Sathankulam case especially during the DMK regime from 2021 to date.

#1 June 2021 – Murugesan

In June 2021, Murugesan, a fruit stall owner, died after being beaten by police at the Pappanaickenpatti check post. A video circulated on social media showed Special Sub-Inspector Periyasamy thrashing Murugesan with a lathi until he became motionless. Murugesan had engaged in an argument with the police while being penalised for drunk driving. Periyasamy was arrested following a complaint.

#2 July 2021 – Satte Indra prasad

Satte Indira Prasad (45), a cook from Dhanbad in Jharkhand, died after being detained by police in connection with a burglary attempt in Vettaikarankuttai. Residents reportedly caught him late Sunday night while trying to break into a house and handed him over to the police after allegedly assaulting and tying him with a rope. Prasad was taken to the police station in the early hours of Sunday. Police said he collapsed around 7 am while sitting at the station and was rushed to the Somanur Government Hospital, where he died shortly after. Officials denied custodial assault allegations and said a judicial inquiry was ordered into the death.

#3 August 2021 – Sathyanathan/Sathyavanan

Sathyavanan/Sathyanathan, along with Abdul Majeed and Surya from Sirkazhi, was taken to the Thanjavur West Police Station for questioning in connection with a jewellery theft case. During the course of the interrogation, Sathyanathan died while in custody, raising serious concerns about the circumstances of his death.

#4 September 2021 – Manikandan 

In Paramathi Vellore, a lorry driver named Manikandan from the Sevalkattu Mangli area of Pandamangalam was arrested by the local police in relation to a sexual complaint. While being questioned, Manikandan suddenly collapsed and lost consciousness. He died shortly after, prompting allegations of custodial abuse.

#5 December 2021 – Manikandan 

In Mudukulathur, Ramanathapuram district, a college student named Manikandan was picked up by the police for interrogation. Although he was later released and returned home, he died unexpectedly the following morning. The incident sparked suspicion about the treatment he received during police custody.

#6 January 2022 – Prabhakaran

In January 2022, a physically challenged man named Prabhakaran was locked up for allegedly stealing jewellery. Falling ill in jail, he was rushed to Namakkal Government Hospital and later to Salem Government Hospital, where he died on 11 January 2022. Prabhakaran’s relatives alleged police torture as the cause of death, resulting in the suspension of three police officers.

#7 February 2022 – Sulaiman 

A 42-year-old man suspected of stealing a two-wheeler died on Friday evening while in police custody during interrogation, according to officials. The deceased, identified as Sulaiman from Melapalayam, was allegedly caught by the owner of a bike that had been reported stolen from near Tirunelveli Medical College Hospital (TVMCH) a few days earlier. The bike owner spotted Sulaiman riding the stolen vehicle near Tirunelveli Junction and, with the help of friends, intercepted and nabbed him. After reportedly being beaten by the group, Sulaiman was handed over to the TVMCH Police, who had previously registered a case related to the theft. During interrogation, Sulaiman complained of breathing difficulties and was taken to Tirunelveli Medical College Hospital. However, he died en route. Police said Sulaiman had a history of theft and was facing at least 28 criminal cases.

#8 February 2022 – Thadiveeran

Thadiveeran (38) is said to have died at Taluk Police Station, Tirunelveli district in February 2022. Not much details of his death are available.

#9 April 2022 – Vignesh

On 18 April 2022, during a routine night check at Kellys in Chennai, police stopped two youths, Vignesh (25) and Suresh (28), in an auto. The duo, found in possession of ganja and liquor, engaged in a verbal duel with the police. Vignesh later developed health complications, vomited, and had seizures. Despite being rushed to the hospital, he was declared dead. Relatives reported seeing injuries on Vignesh’s body, leading to the suspension of a police sub-inspector, a constable, and a home guard personnel.

#10 April 2022 – Thangamani

In Tiruvannamalai, Thangamani was taken into police custody on 26 April 2022 for an inquiry into illegal liquor sales. Relatives alleged a false case, stating that the police demanded money for their release. The police claimed Thangamani had fits the next day, leading to his hospitalisation and subsequent death during treatment.

#11 June 2022 – Rajasekar

Rajasekar, a 33-year-old resident of Munthiri Thoppu in Tiruvallur district, was brought to the P6 Kodungaiyur police station on 11 June 2022 for an inquiry related to two burglary cases. He was pronounced dead at the Government Stanley Medical College Hospital on 12 June 2022. The autopsy report revealed multiple external injuries, with two injuries occurring approximately 18-24 hours before his death.

#12 June 2022 – Siva Subramanian

In Nagapattinam district, a 44-year-old man named Siva Subramanian, employed at a cycle repair shop, died in judicial custody. Siva and his brother Ganesh were detained after a brawl with Venkatesh, who owed Ganesh ₹95,000. According to the police, Siva suffered seizures while in jail and was taken to Nagapattinam Government Hospital, where he passed away on the evening of 13 June 2022. The police attributed his death to alcohol withdrawal symptoms, dismissing reports of custodial torture.

#13 September 2022 – Thangapandi

Chinnadurai (32) from Sembatti died after being taken into police custody in Aruppukottai, triggering allegations of custodial torture from his family. According to sources, he was first caught by members of the public in MTR Nagar for allegedly trespassing and impersonating a police officer before being handed over to the police. During questioning, officials reportedly learned that he had a history of mental illness and had previously undergone psychiatric treatment. Police later took him into custody again on Tuesday night for further interrogation and admitted him to hospital afterwards, where he died. His relatives protested, alleging police assault and demanding action, a government job for a family member, and a CB-CID probe.

#14 September 2022 – Muruganantham

Muruganantham (44) from Ariyalur district died inside the Samayapuram police station in Tiruchy after being detained on allegations of cellphone theft. He was reportedly caught by members of the public and handed over to the police. On Monday morning, Muruganandham was found hanging in the police station restroom using his waist thread. CCTV footage reviewed by officials reportedly showed that he entered the restroom around 8.45 am and did not return. The incident raised suspicions of a custodial death, and a case was registered under Section 176 of the CrPC. A constable, Ramky, was suspended for alleged negligence. Muruganantham was also facing charges in a previous murder case.

#15 September 2022 – Akash

Akash (21), a resident of Ayanavaram and a history-sheeter, died at Kilpauk Medical College Hospital nearly a week after being detained by Otteri police for questioning. Police said he was picked up on 21 September 2022 in connection with a car window damage case and released the same night. They claimed he later consumed drugs at home, overdosed, and was admitted to the hospital on 22 September 2022, where he died on 29 September 2022. However, Akash’s family alleged he was assaulted in police custody and had visible injuries on his body. A case under Section 176(1)(A) CrPC was registered and a magistrate inquiry ordered into the death.

#16 December 2022 – Gokul Shree

In December 2022, Gokul Shree, a 17-year-old teen, was arrested on December 28 by the Railway Police in Tambaram on suspicion of stealing a battery from a railway station. He was sent to a children correctional facility because he was a minor. On December 31, he was rushed to Chengalpet Government Hospital with complaints of seizures, where he passed away within hours.

The preliminary autopsy report showed that the child was subjected to a physical attack, had severe contusions on his legs, and several external injuries on his body. The child was beaten severely before being killed, and the majority of his injuries were were ante-mortem. The parents, however, were not given access to the complete autopsy report.

On the basis of the postmortem report, six prison officials of the correctional facility were arrested. S Mohan, 30, superintendent of prisons, P Vidyasagar, 33, assistant superintendent of prisons, J H Raj, 29, barber at the juvenile home, prison wardens D Vijayakumar, 30, M Saranraj, and teacher R Chandrababu, 40, were arrested.

#17 June 2023 – Thangasamy

In June 2023, the death of a 26-year-old Scheduled Caste (Pallar community) youth, Thangasamy, who was in the custody of the Puliyangudi police in Tenkasi district died. According to reports, Thangasamy was remanded in judicial custody, but he complained of uneasiness, prompting authorities to transfer him to Tirunelveli Medical College. However, his condition deteriorated, and he subsequently passed away.

According to Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPc) Section 176 (I) of the CrPC, in the event of a person’s death or disappearance in custody or if a woman is raped in custody, the Judicial Magistrate holds the authority to order an inquiry. Section 54 of the CrPC also empowers the Magistrate to appoint a medical petitioner to examine accused individuals under trial. The Indian Penal Code (IPC) in Sections 330 (a) and (b) allows for sentences of up to 7 years for policemen involved in cases of torture.

#18 July 2023 – Vedan 

Vedan, a locksmith from Sealnayakkanpatti in Madurai district, died while being taken in for questioning by the police on suspicion. The circumstances surrounding his death raised concerns about the treatment he received during the custody process.

#19 January 2024 – Balakrishnan

In January 2024, Tamil Nadu witnessed another shocking case of alleged custodial death. M. Balakrishnan, a 36-year-old from Srivaikuntam, Thoothukkudi, travelled to Erode on 26 December 2023. The next day, while at a bar in Palayapalayam with friends, he and five others were detained by Erode police. While four were released, Balakrishnan and his friend Prakash were allegedly held in a private lodge and interrogated over an old case. His family claims he was brutally assaulted by police, leading to his hospitalisation on 28 December and eventual death on 2 January 2024 at Perundurai Government Medical College Hospital. His brother, M. Mariyappan, filed a complaint citing custodial torture. Advocate V. Maharajan, representing the family, highlighted severe injuries and alleged evidence tampering. The Madras High Court ordered a fresh post-mortem in Coimbatore on 9 January. A case under CrPC Section 176(1A) was registered at Chennimalai police station.

#20 April 2024 – Karthi

Karthi from Madurai is said to have died by custodial torture in April 2024.

#21 April 2024 – Raja

K. Raja (44), a Dalit resident of Villupuram, allegedly died after being assaulted in police custody at the Villupuram taluk police station in connection with the illegal sale of TASMAC liquor. According to his family, Raja went missing on April 9 and was found in police custody the next morning. They alleged he returned home later that day complaining of severe police assault, gasping for breath before collapsing. He was taken to Villupuram Government Hospital, where doctors declared him dead. His family later buried the body but later approached the Villupuram district court seeking exhumation and an investigation into alleged custodial torture.

#22 April 2024 – Santhakumar

Santhakumar (35) died after being taken into police custody by Sevvapet police in Tiruvallur district. He and several others were arrested from a wedding hall on suspicion of plotting an attack and were taken to the police station for inquiry. Police said that while being taken to court for judicial remand, Santhakumar suddenly collapsed and was rushed to the Tiruvallur Government Hospital, where he was declared dead, reportedly due to cardiac arrest. However, his family alleged he was beaten in custody. Following the incident, Inspector Gunasekaran of Nazarathpet police station, who handled the case, was placed under suspension pending further inquiry.

#23 August 2024 – Arputharaj

In August 2024, Arputharaj (33), an undertrial prisoner, died a day after being remanded to Villupuram sub-jail. Arrested on a non-bailable warrant in an assault case, he reportedly collapsed in jail and was declared dead on arrival at Villupuram Government Hospital. While police claim he fell ill suddenly, his family alleges police assault led to his death. A judicial inquiry and post-mortem have been ordered to determine the cause.

#24 September 2024 – Dravidamani

In September 2024, Dravidamani (40), arrested for illegal liquor sale, died while being taken to Mahatma Gandhi Memorial Government Hospital from Trichy Central Prison after complaining of chest pain. Police claim he collapsed during lunch and died en route to the hospital. Earlier, he was arrested by Jeeyapuram police on 26 September for possessing 66 IMFL bottles and was remanded to judicial custody. His family alleged custodial torture and staged a protest at the hospital, which was later called off after officials promised an investigation. An autopsy was conducted in the presence of a judicial magistrate before the body was handed over to the family

#25 November 2024 – Vignesh

In November 2024, a 36-year-old man named Vignesh, detained during a drug raid, died while being taken to the Pudukkottai Government Medical College Hospital after reportedly falling ill in custody. Police claimed his death was due to health complications during inquiry. He was one of 13 suspects detained after a tip-off. A case under BNSS Section 196 (suspicious death) was registered, and Judicial Magistrate A. Vijayabharathi inspected the body and questioned family members. An x-ray was ordered to check for internal injuries. The body was handed over to the family, while the other detainees were remanded to jail.

#26 February 2025 – Shankar

A 35-year-old history-sheeter, Shankar alias ‘Vettu’ Shankar, with over 40 criminal cases against him, died on 13 February at Karur Government Medical College Hospital while undergoing surgery. He had been arrested on 7 February after allegedly attacking a man with a sickle and sustaining injuries while trying to flee police custody.

Police claim he fractured his leg jumping off a bridge during the arrest. However, JAACT, a human rights group led by Henry Tiphagne, alleges Shankar was held in illegal detention from 6 to 8 February and tortured, leading to his death. They have demanded an independent inquiry and access to CCTV footage to verify the custodial torture claims. A judicial inquiry under Section 196 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita is underway.

#27 April 2025 – Senthil

In April 2025, a youth named Senthil was found dead under suspicious circumstances in the Emanur forest area near Pennagaram, located in Dharmapuri district. Senthil had reportedly been under investigation as a suspect in an elephant poaching case. According to initial reports, he was allegedly taken to the forest area by authorities as part of the probe. However, he was later found dead, and officials claimed he had escaped custody while still in handcuffs a detail that has raised serious questions and fueled public skepticism. Amid mounting pressure and controversy surrounding the circumstances of his death, a CBI-CID inquiry was ordered to conduct an independent and thorough investigation into the incident.

#28 July 2025 – Ajithkumar

The state was rocked by the news of a 27-year-old temple guard, Ajithkumar, employed under Tamil Nadu’s HR&CE Department, having died in police custody on 28 June 2025. Detained by Thirubhuvanam Police over an alleged theft of 80g of gold jewellery from a disabled devotee’s car at Madapuram Kaliamman temple, Ajith was reportedly tortured for 18 hours without any formal legal procedure. Witnesses claim he was beaten with rods, tied to a tree, and forced to drink chilli-laced water. His brother, Naveen, also alleges being beaten to force a false confession. Ajith died at Thirubhuvanam Government Hospital, but the police allegedly moved the body without informing the family. Protests erupted after news of his death spread, with demands for a CBI probe and FIRs against senior officials. Six policemen have been arrested, but critics call this a cover-up, pointing to political interference and a pattern of custodial deaths in the region.

#29 October 2025 – Dinesh

Dinesh Kumar (30) allegedly died in police custody after being taken for questioning by Anna Nagar police in Madurai on October 9. According to his family, police took him from his home early in the morning for inquiry. Hours later, officials informed them that he had drowned in a pond near the Vandiyur outpost while attempting to escape from custody. Suspecting foul play, his mother approached the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court. The court ordered a CB-CID investigation, directed that the postmortem be conducted according to guidelines, and asked authorities to preserve CCTV footage from the police outpost and surrounding areas.

#30 March 2026 – Akash 

Akash Delison (26), arrested in connection with a sickle attack in Manamadurai’s Zion Nagar, died in judicial custody on March 8, 2026, at Madurai Government Rajaji Hospital. Police said he fractured his leg while trying to escape arrest and later developed breathing difficulties in hospital. However, his family rejected this version and alleged that he was brutally assaulted by Manamadurai police during interrogation, including being beaten with stones placed on his legs. They also claimed casteist abuses were used against him. Akash’s family refused to accept the body and demanded action against the police personnel involved, even as the DMK government hadn’t issued a statement.

Below is a list of few more under/unreported custodial deaths from a website Keetru, these deaths follow the same timeframe and pattern:

#31 April 2024 – Jeyakumar

On 16 April 2024, a 60-year-old man identified as Jayakumar from Virudhunagar–Sivakasi died while in judicial custody at Palayamkottai Central Prison.

#32 August 2024 – Baskar

On 22 August 2024, Baskar (39) from Cuddalore–Virudhachalam died while in judicial custody after being admitted to the Cuddalore Government Hospital from Cuddalore Central Prison.

#33 September 2024 – Balakumar

On 14 September 2024, Balakumar (26) from Ramanathapuram allegedly died due to torture at the Uchippuli Police Station in Ramanathapuram.

#34 March 2025 – Shivanaiah

On 21 March 2025, a man identified as Shivanaiah from The Nilgiris allegedly died at Emarald Police Station after reportedly committing suicide, which was said to be linked to a false theft case.

#35 July 2025 – Marimuthu

On 31 July 2025, Marimuthu (48) from Tiruppur reportedly died in connection with the Udumalpet Forest Range Office and Salem Town jurisdiction.

#36 August 2025 – Duraisamy

On 23 August 2025, Duraisamy (65) from Salem died in connection with Salem Town Police Station.

#37 October 2025 – Vinodkumar

On 14 October 2025, Vinodkumar (29) from Tenkasi died while in judicial custody at Palayamkottai Central Prison.

#38 October 2025 – Subin Kumar

On 26 October 2025, Subin Kumar (19) from Perambalur died in judicial custody at the Central Prison in Tiruchy.

#39 February 2026 – Vibhi/Punithan 

Vibhi alias Punithan, a youth from Koodameri in Tambaram, allegedly died after being taken into police custody on February 13, 2026. According to human rights activist Henri Tiphagne, he was arrested by plainclothes policemen from his home and later remanded to Puzhal prison after a medical clearance from Chromepet Hospital. Prison authorities reportedly noticed multiple injuries and initially refused to admit him, sending him to Stanley Hospital for treatment. However, he was later taken back to prison. His health reportedly deteriorated on February 18 and he was again shifted to Stanley Hospital, where he died the following day. Tiphagne alleged custodial torture and demanded accountability from police and officials involved.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Rajini Fans Must Ensure That Political Coward Joseph Vijay Loses Miserably And Stands With His Tail Tucked Between His Legs Just As He Once Did Before Jayalalithaa

On 12 March 2026, TVK Vijay’s right-hand man and the party’s General Secretary for Election Campaign Management Aadhav Arjuna aimed at Rajinikanth claiming the DMK family threatened actor Rajinikanth when he attempted to enter politics in Tamil Nadu.

Arjuna was desperately trying to prop up his leader — a man who fled after a stampede killed 41 people, including children. He stayed holed up in his house for three days, then emerged with a filmi-style video as if he were threatening CM Stalin. Not an apology. Not a visit to the victims’ homes. Instead, the grieving families were made to come to him.

Joseph Vijay has a problem. His party has no ideology, no governance record, no original thought, and nothing independently produced to show Tamil Nadu. So, what Aadhav Arjuna did was exactly what politically bankrupt outfits always do – grabbed someone else’s name, manufactured a narrative around it, and tried to sell it as political courage.

Aadhav claimed DMK threatened Rajinikanth into staying out of politics. But his Vijay? He bows to no one, it seems. Does he not remember the viral video where Vijay was standing with folded hands begging the then-CM Jayalalithaa to help him release his film? Memory loss maybe. Ok, set that aside for a moment.

Let us rewind a bit. Aadhav Arjuna was a DMK member before jumping ship to VCK and then TVK. He says that the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam threatened Rajinikanth to keep him out of the 2021 Assembly elections — even though Aadhav Arjuna himself was with the DMK at the time.

Was he present when these alleged threats were issued? Did he participate? Is he confessing to involvement while framing it as an accusation? Because if this information is true, he was inside the machinery that allegedly did it. And if it is false, he fabricated a defamatory story on a public stage with Joseph Vijay’s full knowledge.

Joseph Vijay has not said a word about it since. Not a clarification. Not a distancing statement. Nothing. In politics, silence after a subordinate’s public statement is endorsement. Vijay owns this. People who have followed Vijay’s career to some extent will know that Vijay is a self-confessed Rajinikanth fan who drew deep inspiration from the superstar, most famously when he recreated the iconic challenge dialogue from Rajinikanth’s film Annamalai, recorded it on video, and showed it to his reluctant father SA Chandrasekhar who was so impressed that he agreed to launch Vijay in Naalaiya Theerpu (1992).

Vijay has publicly called Rajinikanth his biggest inspiration on multiple occasions, even picking Naan Sigappu Manidhan, the only Rajinikanth film directed by his father, as his favourite from his father’s entire filmography. However, while Rajinikanth himself had modelled his early career after Amitabh Bachchan, Vijay similarly drew from Rajinikanth in his formative years before eventually carving out his own distinct identity as “Thalapathy” with energetic dance numbers, youth-oriented films, and social messaging becoming one of Tamil cinema’s biggest stars in his own right.

And yet, Aadhav, with the silent affirmation from Vijay, fired his salvo on the same Rajinikanth.

The Facts TVK Did Not Bother Checking

Rajinikanth’s withdrawal from politics is documented public record. In December 2020, he announced he would not launch his party, citing his own health – he had just been hospitalised in Hyderabad with severe blood pressure fluctuations, was on immunosuppressant medication following a 2016 kidney transplant, and his doctors had warned him against Covid-19 exposure risk. He called it a “warning from God.” In July 2021, he formally dissolved the Rajini Makkal Mandram. That Rajini excused himself from politics citing health reasons while going on to act in film produced by DMK family is a debate for another day. May be he realized that mere star power is not enough to pull people to the poll booth.

But Aadhav Arjuna did not offer an alternate interpretation of events. He invented one from scratch with zero evidence and delivered it as fact from a party platform. And it was served to the public by a party whose leader sat quietly and let it happen – the same guy whose career launch was because of Rajinikanth.

What TVK Actually Is

Strip away the film star’s face and what does TVK have?

Its voter base is a converted fan following – made of obsessive sycophants as cadre, not a political constituency built through years of grassroots work. Its ideological framework is recycled DMK vocabulary: social justice, Dravidian identity, caste equity repackaged with a newer, younger aesthetic.

The “Courage” Argument Collapses Under Scrutiny

Aadhav Arjuna’s point was simple: Rajinikanth feared DMK, Vijay does not.

But what exactly has Vijay done that requires courage?

He has not faced a single press meet. He has only participated in cadre meets and political meetings with his cadre. He has not participated in any debates or any media conclaves. Instead, he had a closed-door discussion with the NDTV team who then discussed the discussion they had! Wow.

Vijay has not met with any political party leaders; it is alleged that he has a wall of a few people around him and message passes on to him through them. He has not contested a single election. He has not lost anything. He has not sacrificed anything. He has not governed anything.

Claiming that he quit his career at his peak and said he has sacrificed a lot is laughable – has he quit living a luxurious life? Is he sleeping on the pavement and living life like an underprivileged citizen of this country?

Vijay has absorbed public adulation and wants more of it; he has held large rallies, made scripted speeches – most often after the first 10-15 minutes he starts looking at the paper to help him remember the script. He makes tall claims in his speeches, quotes random data only to get fact-checked later. That is not courage. That is just a mishmash.

Rajinikanth, whatever one thinks of his political career, made a public call, took the criticism for it, and did not blame anyone else for his decision. That required more political spine than anything TVK has demonstrated in its entire existence.

The Real Pattern Here

This is not the first time Joseph Vijay has used Rajinikanth as a ladder. He has been doing it his entire career. The only thing that has changed is the arena.

When Vijay was clawing his way up in Tamil cinema, he did not build a new identity – he photocopied an existing one. The mass hero template, the slow-motion entry, the fan culture machinery, the superstar mythology – Rajinikanth had constructed all of it brick by brick over thirty years of genuine struggle. Vijay walked in, reverse-engineered the blueprint, and sold it back to a younger audience as something fresh. His fans will deny this furiously. The filmography does not.

He spent two decades in cinema living in Rajinikanth’s shadow, desperately trying to step out of it and never fully succeeding. Every time a Vijay film was positioned as a “mass entertainer,” every time his fans called him “Thalapathy” and built a superstar cult around him, they were operating inside a framework Rajinikanth had already invented. Vijay did not disrupt Tamil cinema’s hero model. He franchised it.

And now, in politics, the man has done it again.

TVK has no original ideology. It has no governance vision, it has no political identity that exists independently of its leader’s film stardom – the same stardom, incidentally, that was itself constructed in the image of someone else.

So when TVK needed media oxygen on March 11, when its ‘politics’ (or the lack of it) was not generating sufficient heat on its own, what did it do? It sent Aadhav Arjuna to a stage to fabricate a story about Rajinikanth being threatened into silence with zero shame. Not because the story is true. But because Rajinikanth’s name in a headline guarantees attention that TVK’s own name cannot.

This is the full arc of Joseph Vijay’s career in one sentence: he has never been able to generate his own gravity, so he has always orbited someone else’s.

In cinema, he orbited Rajinikanth’s stardom and called it inspiration. In politics, he is orbiting Rajinikanth’s reputation and calling it courage. The only difference is that this time, the borrowing comes with defamation attached.

A man who spent his entire film career trying to become Tamil Nadu’s next Rajinikanth is now trying to build his political career by tearing Rajinikanth down. The irony would be funny if the lie was not so deliberate.

The 2026 Mandate for Rajini Fans

Crores of Rajinikanth fans exist across Tamil Nadu. They are not a monolith. They vote across party lines. Many of them had initially looked at TVK with curiosity – a new face, a clean slate, a chance at change.

That goodwill has now been squandered on a stage speech.

Rajini fans in 2026 have one task: wherever TVK contests, make them lose their deposit. Not a narrow loss. A loss that sends an unambiguous message – you do not use Rajinikanth’s name as a stepladder for your leader’s political ambitions and expect to walk away with votes.

Tamil Nadu’s voters are sharp. They understand the difference between a leader who stepped back to protect lives and a party that drags his name through controversy to manufacture relevance.

In 2026, let the ballot deliver the verdict.

Vijay deserves a defeat so humiliating that he is reminded of his place — the same man who once stood outside Jayalalithaa’s residence should again find himself outside Rajini’s Poes Garden with his tail tucked between his legs.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

‘Enjoy Enjaami’ Row: Dravidianists Target Santhosh Narayanan Over Brahmin Identity

A fresh public dispute has erupted between rapper Arivu and music composer Santhosh Narayanan over the authorship, ownership and credit for the viral 2021 Tamil song “Enjoy Enjaami.” The exchange unfolded on social media after a user accused singer Dhee and her stepfather Santhosh Narayanan of “stealing” the song from Arivu, reigniting a controversy that first surfaced in 2022.

The trigger was a social media post sharing a clip from the popular song, following which a user alleged that Dhee and Narayanan had taken the song from Arivu.

The accusation quickly gained traction online and revived older narratives surrounding the track’s credit and ownership.

Responding to the allegation, Santhosh Narayanan dismissed the claim and explained the creative process behind the song. “Konjam rest edunga thambi. Some useful info already available everywhere if you only look for it,” he wrote. Narayanan stated that the idea for the song was conceived by Dhee, with the core storyline and concept shaped by filmmaker Manikandan, who was working on Kadaisi Vivasayi with him at the time. “I composed, produced and created all the melodies in the song. Arivu wrote almost all the words and also performed,” he said, adding that some traditional Oppari lines were adapted by Arivu.

The composer also criticised what he described as attempts to politicise the song’s success, remarking that narratives around the track began shifting after it became widely popular.

Arivu, however, reiterated that he had written the lyrics, composed the main vocal melody and performed the song based on his cultural experiences. He alleged that he was credited only as a “featuring artist” and received neither ownership nor royalties from the track.

As the exchange intensified, sections of the Dravidianist ecosystem online began targeting Narayanan personally, bringing up his Brahmin caste identity while amplifying accusations of appropriation.

Here are some such posts.

What began as a dispute over credit and royalties for Enjoy Enjaami has quickly taken a predictable turn. Instead of focusing on contracts, evidence, and creative contributions, sections of the Dravidianist ecosystem online have shifted the debate to Santhosh Narayanan’s Brahmin identity, framing the issue as caste appropriation. This pattern is familiar in Tamil Nadu’s political discourse: when facts become inconvenient, the argument pivots to identity.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

‘Why Have You Come Only Now?’, After 17-Year-Old’s Rape & Murder, DMK MP Kanimozhi Faces The Heat From Villagers In Thoothukudi

Not a day passes by in DMK-ruled Dravidian Model Tamil Nadu without the news of a girl or woman being raped/murdered. We just heard of the brutal rape and murder of a Class 12 girl in Thoothukudi which happens to be DMK MP Kanimozhi’s constituency.

Just days ago, a 17-year-old Class 12 student was allegedly sexually assaulted and murdered near Vilathikulam in Thoothukudi district, triggering outrage across Tamil Nadu. The girl, who had been reported missing earlier in the week, was found dismembered on Wednesday (11 March 2026), with her remains recovered by police and sent for post-mortem examination.

Tension ran high in the Vedanatham village after a group of women and youth blocked and surrounded DMK MP Kanimozhi, who had arrived to offer condolences to the family of a 17-year-old schoolgirl who was allegedly raped and murdered.

The incident has sparked widespread outrage, with villagers accusing the police of negligence. Locals claim that the police failed to act on a complaint filed by the girl’s parents when she first went missing. In protest against the police handling of the case, residents had been staging a road blockade on the Thoothukudi-Madurai National Highway for over 12 hours a day for the past two days.

As reported in Tamil Samayam, against this backdrop of unrest, DMK MP Kanimozhi and DMK Minister Geetha Jeevan visited the village on 13 March 2026 to meet the victim’s family.

However, as they were leaving, the local residents confronted them. A large crowd, including many women and young people, blocked their path and engaged in a heated argument, questioning the purpose of their visit.

Specifically, voices questioning “Where were you all yesterday? Why have you come only now?” grew louder. They also questioned, “Why haven’t those responsible been arrested yet?, expressing their anger that no arrests had been made in the case.

With the situation turning confrontational, a police team led by District SP Madan intervened. They managed to disperse the agitated crowd and safely rescue MP Kanimozhi and Minister Geetha Jeevan, escorting them out of the area.

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by Dr.SG Suryah (@suryahsg)

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“Brazen Lies, Dishonest And Delusional As Always”: Sandy Nara Calls Out Arivu Over Enjoy Enjaami Song Credits

Santhosh Narayanan Calls Out Arivu As “Enjoy Enjaami” Song Credit Dispute Flares Up Again

A fresh public dispute has erupted between rapper Arivu and music composer Santhosh Narayanan over the authorship, ownership and credit for the viral 2021 Tamil song “Enjoy Enjaami.” The exchange unfolded on social media after a user accused singer Dhee and her stepfather Santhosh Narayanan of “stealing” the song from Arivu, reigniting a controversy that first surfaced in 2022.

The issue started when a handle shared a clipping of the popular song. This led to someone accusing the singer Dhee and Santhosh of ‘stealing’ the song from Arivu.

This led to Santhosh responding to the allegations explaining who gets the credit, “Konjam rest edunga thambi. Some useful info already available everywhere if you only look for it . This song idea was conceived by Dhee and also has some of her tunes in it . The core storyline and concept of the song was done by director Manikandan who was working on Kadaisi Vivasayi with me at the time. I composed , produced and created all the melodies in the song . Arivu wrote almost all the words and also performed . Some traditional Oppari lines were also adapted by Arivu.. I only suggested the word Enjaami like I always suggest for most of my songs like Rakitaa , Kanimaa etc. Thankfully we live in a digital domain and every claim can and should be proven.”

Replying to a comment asking Naraynanan to ask Arivu to belt out another hit, he said, “I think it is unfair to expect someone to prove their worth as proof for something else completely. Having said that it is very sad that the guy jumped on a stupid political
bandwagon after the song started to get extremely popular , which we did never expected in the first place. Slowly the narratives started shifting in interviews . I have many before / after interview clips which can be part of a nice standup comedy routine “

In this situation, Arivu, the rapper who was at the centre of the controversy wrote a long thread saying, “For clarity regarding “Enjoy Enjaami” (released 5 years ago):

The beat was sent to me. I wrote the lyrics, composed the main vocal melody and performed the song based on my own cultural history and lived experience. Music is collaborative. But credit and compensation must also be fair. The song was shot in my village, with stories from my land and my people. I shared that history believing it would reach the masses. But I was placed only as a “featuring artist” — despite writing the full song and composing the main melody. Back then I did not understand what that meant. Five years later, the collaborators hold the rights and receive royalties, while I received no payment and no ownership for my work. This is not about sympathy.
It is about credit, rights and dignity of labour. Independent artists: protect your work.
Have agreements. Know your rights.

– Arivu
Valliamma Perandi.”

Santhosh Narayanan, the producer of the song, responded reminding Arivu that he had blocked him a while ago, “You can have your own opinions man. Pretty much every single one of your technical/ownership/legal claims are dishonest and delusional as always. Are you open to debate this in any medium/channel of your choice with all the proofs of your claims ?? As your esteemed self has blocked me everywhere else, you can reply here and I shall be available anytime .”

Arivu replied to this saying, “My statement on credit, ownership and compensation is already public. I tried multiple times to resolve this privately — even visiting your home. Those efforts went nowhere. This isn’t a social media debate. Facts speak for themselves. Appropriate channels exist.”

Santhosh further replied to this comment saying, Yes this should never been a social media talking point until you made it one with brazen lies. Again a beautiful fabrication of deceit when you say you tried to resolve this. You never responded once during all those trying times when I had to stay silent. Also you came home once last year to invite me for your marriage (I was abroad and my staff told me later). This was after you had blocked me and made a song about it. Anba dhan pesuven I promise let’s debate this man .”

The renewed clash between Arivu and Santhosh Narayanan has once again brought the long-running “Enjoy Enjaami” credit dispute back into public view. While Arivu maintains that he wrote the lyrics, composed the main vocal melody and was unfairly credited only as a featuring artist without ownership or royalties, Narayanan strongly disputes those claims, insisting the song was conceived as a collaborative effort involving Dhee, director Manikandan and himself, with Arivu contributing the lyrics and performance.

With both sides standing firmly by their versions and challenging each other’s claims, the disagreement has moved beyond a simple creative dispute into questions of credit, ownership and compensation in collaborative music projects.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Congress’ Assam Plan? Pawan Khera Says Deport “Hindu Infiltrators” Too

Congress’ Assam Plan? Khera Says Deport “Hindu Infiltrators” Too

Congress spokesperson and AICC media chairman Pawan Khera, while appearing on a discussion by Aaj Tak – Panchayat Assam, ahead of the state’s assembly elections, said that illegal residents must be removed regardless of religion, stating: “Any infiltrator, whether Hindu or Muslim, if living illegally, that is wrong, whether Hindu or Muslim.”

He added that a Congress government in Assam would take all decisions “on the basis of the 1985 Accord”.

The 1985 Accord Vs. The 2019 Law

When pressed by the anchor on whether Congress would remove infiltrators if it came to power, Khera replied: “We take all decisions on the basis of the 1985 Accord”.

The Assam Accord sets a cut-off of 24 March 1971 – any illegal immigrant arriving after that date is subject to detection. Khera’s insistence on governing by the 1971 cut-off, while making no acknowledgement of CAA, means a Congress government in Assam would apply the same deportation standard to Hindu refugees that Parliament has already granted statutory protection. The CAA’s cut-off, moreover, was extended to 31 December 2024 by the MHA in September 2025 specifically to protect Hindus who fled the anti-minority violence that followed Sheikh Hasina’s fall in Bangladesh.

In October 2024, the Supreme Court (4:1 majority) upheld Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, the legal embodiment of the Assam Accord, reinforcing the 1971 cut-off as Assam’s special citizenship framework.

Assam Accord vs CAA

When asked about deporting infiltrators, Pawan Khera said a Congress government in Assam would take decisions “on the basis of the 1985 Assam Accord,” which sets 24 March 1971 as the cut-off for detecting illegal migrants.

However, Parliament later created a statutory exception through the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) for persecuted minorities from Bangladesh, Pakistan and Afghanistan. In September 2025, the Union Home Ministry extended the eligibility window to migrants who entered India up to 31 December 2024.

Khera’s reliance solely on the 1971 Accord framework, without acknowledging the CAA, raises a basic question: would a Congress government treat Hindu refugees fleeing persecution the same as illegal economic migrants, despite Parliament having created a legal distinction between the two?

What the Law Distinguishes, Khera Does Not

Khera’s framing collapses a crucial legal distinction: a Bangladeshi Hindu fleeing religious persecution is not considered an infiltrator and is protected under the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) with eligibility for Indian citizenship, whereas a Bangladeshi Muslim entering India as an illegal economic migrant is classified as an infiltrator and is subject to detection and deportation.

By treating both identically, Khera is either arguing that Parliament’s CAA should not apply in Assam, or that the religious persecution of Hindus in Bangladesh does not warrant a different legal treatment from economic illegal migration. Neither is a position the law supports.

The Appeasement Calculus

When Khera insists on the 1985 Accord as the sole governing framework, he is, knowingly or not, arguing that Bangladeshi Hindu refugees should receive no more protection than Muslim illegal migrants. He is arguing that Parliament’s CAA, passed with a constitutional majority, should not apply. He is arguing that the religious persecution that drove Hindus out of Bangladesh is legally irrelevant.

And he is doing all of this while carefully never saying the words “Muslim infiltrator” because that would cost Congress votes. Instead, he symmetrises: “Hindu or Muslim, same standard.” It sounds fair. It is actually a political manoeuvre that uses the language of equality to deny protection to a persecuted minority – one that Indian law has already recognised.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Goondas Act Invoked Against Two In Madurai For Hoarding 398 LPG Cylinders

Goondas Act Invoked Against Two In Madurai For Hoarding LPG Cylinders
Image Source: Tamil Janam

Madurai authorities have invoked preventive detention laws against two men accused of hoarding and illegally selling large quantities of LPG cylinders, marking the first instance in Tamil Nadu where such action has been taken in connection with gas cylinder hoarding.

As reported in The New Indian Express, officials from the Civil Supplies Criminal Investigation Department (CSCID) conducted a raid on Wednesday at a vacant site near Kovilpappakudi Athalai in Madurai. During the operation, they seized 209 LPG cylinders, including 100 subsidised domestic cylinders and 109 commercial cylinders.

Palani, 46, the son of Mayan, was arrested at the spot during the raid.

Following the initial seizure, CSCID officials carried out a further search near the residence of V Madhankumar, 27, in Anandam Nagar. This operation led to the confiscation of another 189 cylinders, consisting of 63 subsidised domestic cylinders and 126 commercial cylinders.

In total, officials seized 398 LPG cylinders from the two locations.

Separate cases were registered against the accused under the Essential Commodities Act, after which both individuals were arrested.

Based on recommendations from CSCID officials and a proposal submitted by Superintendent of Police Srinivasa Perumal, Madurai District Collector KJ Praveenkumar ordered their preventive detention under the Prevention of Blackmarketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities Act.

Officials reported that Palani and Madhankumar were lodged in Madurai Central Prison on Thursday following the detention order.

Authorities stated that this marks the first time in Tamil Nadu that preventive detention provisions commonly referred to as the Goondas Act framework have been applied in a case involving the hoarding of LPG cylinders.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

The Freebie Trap: How Welfare Politics Is Eating India’s Future

The Freebie Trap: How Welfare Politics Is Crowding Out India’s Future

India is borrowing money to give it away and the bill is coming due in sectors that actually build nations: research, infrastructure, health, and education.

The Freebie Explosion Is Documented

This is not an opposition talking point. India’s own Economic Survey 2025-26, tabled by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, is the source. State-level unconditional cash transfers (UCTs): free cash with no conditions, no outcomes, no accountability, ballooned more than fivefold between FY23 and FY26, reaching ₹1.7 lakh crore this year alone. At least half the states running these schemes are already in revenue deficit – meaning they are borrowing money to give it away

What Is Being Sacrificed: The Numbers

India spends more on food subsidy alone (₹2,28,154 Cr) than on all of education (₹1,28,650 Cr) at the central level as of 2025. India’s R&D investment at 0.64% of GDP is less than one-fifth of South Korea’s, less than one-third of China’s.

  • US: 3.48%
  • China: 2.43%
  • S.Korea: 4.91%

These are not abstract statistics – they represent the gap between a nation building its future and one consuming it.

The Fiscal Trap States Are Falling Into

The Economic Survey explicitly warns: “Unless deficits widen further, additional spending will crowd out resources for critical social and physical infrastructure”. The numbers back this up:

  • States’ combined fiscal deficit has risen from 2.6% of GDP in FY22 to 3.2% in FY25
  • 62% of state revenues are already locked into salaries, pensions, interest payments, and subsidies leaving barely a third for anything developmental
  • 16 states have budgeted a gross fiscal deficit exceeding 3% of GSDP for 2025-26; 13 states exceed 3.5%
  • States’ outstanding debt stands at 28.1% of GDP and a significant share of that debt is financing consumption, not assets​

Thus, excessive spending on freebies reduces the funds available for essential infrastructure by shifting resources away from long-term capital investment.​

What Productive Spending Looks Like – And Why India Isn’t Doing It

Brazil’s Bolsa Família, the model the Economic Survey itself recommends India study, gives conditional cash transfers: you receive support only if your children attend school and complete health check-ups. The outcome: human capital is built simultaneously with welfare delivery. India’s UCTs attach no such conditions. Cash goes out, nothing comes back.​

The result is what the Survey describes as welfare that “substitutes rather than complements” investment in skilling, nutrition, and infrastructure. You get a vote. The state gets a deficit. The child gets neither a good school nor a good road.

The R&D Gap Is a National Security Issue

India’s ₹33,337 Cr R&D budget, already embarrassingly small, is now being further squeezed. The Economic Survey flags that India’s 0.64% of GDP R&D spend sits far below the global average, with the private sector contributing only 41% compared to 75-79% in the US, China, and South Korea. Meanwhile, the government has announced a new ₹1 lakh crore RDI Fund over six years, but this ambition sits in direct tension with the fiscal space being consumed by unconditional transfers every single year.​

You cannot build semiconductor fabs, quantum computing capacity, and green hydrogen infrastructure on the fiscal scraps left after the freebie bill is paid.

The Bottom Line

The Economic Survey 2025-26, the Indian government’s own economic document, puts it plainly: “The expansion of unconditional cash transfers across several states has contributed to rising revenue expenditure, with implications for fiscal space and public investment at the state level.”

India is not too poor to invest in education, R&D, healthcare, and infrastructure. It is choosing not to – one election cycle at a time. Freebies win votes in the short term. They cost nations in the long term. The data is in. The question is whether any politician is willing to say it out loud.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

How Reuters Portrayed The Same Festival In India & Pakistan Differently To Suit Its Narratives

Amid the LPG shortage news that was ballooning across Indian media, western media outlet Reuters ably aided by its brown sepoys turned it into an ‘India failure’ story.

The story, bylined by three Indian journalists: Praveen Paramasivam, Chandini Monnappa, and Haripriya Suresh, quickly circulated across international media platforms.

The headline alone framed the narrative: India as a country where households could not cook food.

What the headline omitted was the most important fact. The LPG disruption affecting India in March 2026 was triggered by geopolitical turmoil in West Asia, particularly the disruption of shipping routes through the Strait of Hormuz during the ongoing Iran–Israel conflict. Nearly 90% of India’s LPG imports pass through that corridor, meaning any disruption would inevitably affect supply chains.

In other words, the situation was the consequence of a global conflict, not an Indian governance collapse. Yet the Reuters framing led readers elsewhere.

How Reuters Covered The Same Festival In 2 Different Countries

Now compare that approach with how Reuters covered a similar cultural event in India and Pakistan.

When Pakistan celebrated the lifting of an 18-year ban on the Basant festival kite festival in Lahore, Reuters’ tone was celebratory.

The report described “extravagantly coloured kites duelling above Lahore,” rooftops filled with families, drums beating through the night, and the jubilant cries of “bo-kata!” as kite strings were cut in mid-air. The narrative emphasised the economic boost, hotel bookings, food sales, and festive crowds celebrating the return of a cultural tradition.

Even when safety measures were mentioned, including past injuries from kite strings, they appeared as secondary details within an otherwise vibrant portrait of celebration.

Now look at Reuters’ reporting on the Makar Sankranti kite festival in Ahmedabad.

The headline did not describe colour, celebration, or cultural tradition.

Instead, it read: “Birds injured by kites during the Makar Sankranti festival.”

The focus shifted instantly from celebration to harm. Instead of rooftop festivities or economic activity, the central image presented to global readers was wildlife injury.

Two festivals. The same activity – kite flying.

Yet the narrative framing could not have been more different.

In Pakistan: colour, music, rooftops, tradition, and economic vibrancy.

In India: damage, injury, and environmental harm.

How Western Media Use Brown Sepoys To Peddle Specific Narratives Against India

Over the years, we have been consistently observing how Western media has portrayed the Indian state – first it was through poverty porn and such. Then disaster porn, then when COVID hit, it became funeral porn.

The LPG story portraying Indians unable to cook carried three Indian reporters lending it insider credibility. The same pattern appears in cultural coverage. Pakistan’s Basant festival in Lahore gets colour, celebration and economic vibrancy. India’s Makar Sankranti in Ahmedabad becomes a headline about “birds injured by kites.” Same festival activity, opposite framing – are there no birds that got injured in Pakistan during the same festival? DDo kite strings suddenly become dangerous only when Indians fly them? This is a narrative template – Western editorial agendas packaged with Indian names to legitimise them.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.