In 2007, a young Tamil film star sat before a group of aspiring filmmakers and delivered what he clearly believed was wisdom worth sharing. When asked what advice he had for those who wanted to make a film with him, Vijay’s answer was unambiguous: “Without experience, it’s very difficult, bro. You can get the story right, you can do all of that, but actually working in that field is very tough. At least for that reason, you need some experience.”
Seventeen years later, that same man, now rebranded as a political messiah, is standing before the people of Tamil Nadu asking them to hand him the Chief Minister’s chair. The field has changed. The stakes are infinitely higher. And the experience? Zero.
The Audacity of the Unqualified
Let us be precise about what Vijay brings to Tamil Nadu’s political table. He has never contested an election before this. He has never served in a panchayat, a municipal council, a district administration, or a state legislature. He has no record of policy formulation, crisis management, budget allocation, or bureaucratic coordination. He has never governed so much as a ward. What he has is a filmography, a fan base, and the extraordinary nerve to ask voters for the second-highest executive office in one of India’s most complex and populous states – in his very first political outing.
By his own 2007 standard, Vijay is the least qualified person in the room.
When Crisis Called, Vijay Ran
If there was ever a moment to demonstrate leadership, compassion, and the basic instinct to show up – the Karur stampede was it. When the tragedy struck, killing and injuring his own fans and followers who had gathered in his name, Vijay’s response was not to rush to the site, not to visit hospitals, not to stand alongside the grieving families in their darkest hour. He fled. And then, in what must rank as one of the most tone-deaf acts by an aspiring Chief Minister, he made the victim families travel to him to receive his condolences, inverting every expectation of accountability and human decency that a public figure owes to those who suffered in his name.
This was not an isolated failure of character. When Tamil Nadu was battered by floods and scores of ordinary citizens were left displaced and desperate, Vijay’s relief distribution did not reach people where they were. Flood victims already displaced, already broken were asked to travel to designated locations to collect relief materials that Vijay was distributing. The leader came to no one. Everyone came to the leader. It is a governing philosophy that tells you everything you need to know about how a Chief Minister Vijay would operate – relief on his terms, accountability on his schedule, and ordinary people always made to bear the inconvenience.
So, if he does become a Chief Minister, will he summon flood victims to a convenient venue, will he ask aggrieved victims to travel to receive an apology? These episodes are not minor PR failures – they are a preview of a governance style built around the comfort and image of one man, not the needs of the people he claims to serve.
The Fan Club Cannot Be the Qualification
His supporters will argue that political outsiders bring fresh perspectives, that the system needs disruption, that experience in a corrupt establishment is itself a disqualification. It is a seductive argument and a lazy one. Tamil Nadu is not a film set that can afford reshoots. The decisions made from the Chief Minister’s office affect 8 crore lives – on water, electricity, health, education, employment, law and order, and disaster response. These are not roles that reward learning on the job. Vijay’s own words acknowledged this: working in a field is “very tough” and that toughness demands preparation, not ambition alone.
The irony is almost poetic. When aspirants approached Vijay with passion and a good story, he told them passion was not enough. Experience mattered. Yet he has built an entire political movement on the proposition that he himself should be exempt from the very standard he articulated.
The Rebranding Cannot Erase the Record
Since launching TVK, Vijay has positioned himself as the moral antidote to the DMK and AIADMK duopoly. His rallies draw massive crowds. His rhetoric is polished. His imagery as the common man’s champion is carefully constructed. But imagery is precisely what Vijay has always been good at. It is, after all, his profession. The question people of Tamil Nadu must ask is not whether Vijay plays a convincing leader on screen – they already know he does. The question is whether he can be one off it.
There is no evidence yet that he can. TVK as a party organisation has shown internal chaos, with defections, contradictions, and no proper policy positions on issues that matter to the people. Try asking a TVK cadre their stand on the Thirupparankundram issue or delimitation – they cannot give an educated response. Launched in 2024, the party is contesting its first serious election without a coherent governance blueprint that goes beyond slogans. Even their manifesto is 3x the total budget of Tamil Nadu. This is not the profile of a movement ready to govern – it is the profile of a movement still figuring itself out.
One Standard for Others, None for Himself
What makes Vijay’s hypocrisy particularly sharp is that he did not just privately hold this view – he stated it on camera, to young people who looked up to him, as a guiding principle. He told them: earn your place, build your experience, do not shortcut your way to the top. And then, when his own ambitions turned political, he discarded that principle entirely and asked Tamil Nadu to give him the biggest shortcut of all.
If a young filmmaker had walked up to Vijay in 2007 and said “I have no experience, but I have a massive fan following and good intentions – give me a chance to direct a big-budget film”, Vijay would have turned him away. He would have been right to. Tamil Nadu deserves the same standard applied to its Chief Minister.
The Karur stampede. The flood relief fiasco. The zero legislative record. The party in organisational disarray. Put it all together, and what you have is not a leader in waiting – you have a celebrity who has repeatedly, demonstrably, placed his own comfort and image above the needs of suffering people, and is now asking those very people to trust him with their lives, their livelihoods, and their state.
Vijay’s 2007 advice was not wrong. It was, in fact, entirely correct and it applies to him now more than it ever applied to those filmmakers. Tamil Nadu’s governance is not an entry-level role. It is not a platform for a second act. It is not a prize to be claimed on the strength of a fan club and cinematic charisma.
He said it himself: “Without experience, it’s very difficult.”
He was right then. Nothing has changed, except that now, he is the one without the experience, and the consequences of ignoring that fact will not be borne by him. They will be borne by Tamil Nadu.
Subscribe to our channels on WhatsApp, Telegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.
