Home Blog Page 189

“2020 Delhi Riots Were ‘Organised Regime Change Operation,’” Says Police In Supreme Court

delhi riots

In a major development in the 2020 Delhi riots case, the Delhi Police is set to submit a 177-page affidavit to the Supreme Court claiming that the violence was not a spontaneous outburst but part of an organised “regime change operation” aimed at destabilising the Indian government and undermining national sovereignty.

CNN-News18 reported that the affidavit, filed in response to bail pleas by accused student activists Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam, outlines how investigators have compiled ocular, documentary, and technical evidence pointing to a deep-rooted conspiracy orchestrated along communal lines. “The plan was designed to weaponise public dissent against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA) and strike at the sovereignty and integrity of India,” the affidavit reportedly states.

According to the Delhi Police, the “organised and calibrated” violence in the national capital followed a nationwide pattern, mirroring similar outbreaks in states including Uttar Pradesh, Assam, West Bengal, Kerala, and Karnataka. The affidavit characterises the riots as part of a “synchronised attempt to destabilise the government through orchestrated violence.”

The police have also accused the accused persons of “abusing the judicial process” through “frivolous applications” and coordinated tactics to delay proceedings. “Such conduct amounts to a brazen abuse of process,” the affidavit asserts, arguing that these actions have obstructed justice and hindered the trial’s progress.

The Supreme Court is expected to examine the affidavit as part of ongoing hearings concerning bail and procedural delays in the larger conspiracy case. Delhi Police is being represented by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta and advocates Rajat Nair and Dhruv Pande.

The riots, which took place in February 2020 amid protests over the CAA, left 53 people dead and hundreds injured. The Delhi High Court previously observed that Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam were among the earliest organisers of anti-CAA protests in December 2019, mobilising crowds through speeches, pamphlets, and WhatsApp networks — actions investigators allege evolved into a coordinated plan to incite violence.

While the Delhi Police has described Khalid and Imam as the “intellectual architects” of the conspiracy, the accused have maintained that their activities constituted legitimate dissent protected by constitutional rights and bore no connection to the outbreak of violence.

(Source: News18)

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

Karnataka: Tribunal Halts Suspension Of Panchayat Officer Over RSS March Participation, BJP MP Tejasvi Surya’s Law Office Had Appeared For The Officer

The Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal (KSAT) has stayed the suspension of Praveen Kumar K.P., a Panchayat Development Officer from Raichur district, who was earlier suspended for participating in a Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) centenary event. The case had sparked a political confrontation between the ruling Congress and the opposition BJP.

Kumar, posted in Sirwar taluk, attended an RSS route march in Lingsugur on 12 October 2025 wearing the organisation’s uniform and carrying a stick. The Rural Development and Panchayat Raj (RDPR) Department suspended him on grounds of violating Rule 3 of the Karnataka Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 2021, which mandates political neutrality and conduct consistent with public service.

The suspension order, issued by IAS officer Arundhati Chandrashekar, described his participation as “inconsistent with the standards expected of a public servant.” Kumar was placed under suspension with subsistence allowance pending inquiry.

BJP MP Tejasvi Surya criticised the suspension, calling it “illegal and unlawful.” He stated on social media that he had spoken to the officer and would “personally appear before the concerned tribunal and courts to challenge” the decision, citing previous court rulings upholding government servants’ right to participate in RSS programmes.

On 30 October 2025, Surya confirmed that the KSAT had stayed the suspension. In a post on X, he wrote, “My law office had challenged the arbitrary suspension of PDO Praveen Kumar for participating in the RSS Pathasanchalana in Lingasugur, Raichur, before the Hon’ble Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal. KSAT has today stayed the suspension order which was mechanically passed due to political pressure. This should serve as a lesson to the Congress Govt that no amount of intimidation can deter the nation-building ideals of RSS.”

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

Show-Cause Notices Issued To Karnataka School Staff For Participating in RSS Events

Show-Cause Notices Issued To Karnataka School Staff For Participating in RSS Events
Image Source: Organiser

Several teachers and non-teaching staff from a government school in Karnataka’s Bidar district have been issued show-cause notices for allegedly participating in a march organized by the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), the ideological parent organization of the BJP. Their participation is being viewed as a violation of service rules that prohibit government employees from taking part in political or religious activities.

The Block Education Officer (BEO) of Aurad in Bidar issued the notices to those who took part in RSS Path Sanchalans (route marches) held on October 7 and 13. The move came after complaints were filed by the Dalit Sena Taluk Unit of Aurad and the Bahujan Seva Samiti, accompanied by videos and photographs showing the staff’s participation in the event.

According to the BEO’s notice, the involvement of government staff in the RSS march constitutes a breach of service regulations. The employees have been asked to submit written explanations and appear in person before the officer. The notice further warns that failure to respond could lead to unilateral disciplinary action under the Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957. A departmental investigation is currently underway.

Earlier in October 2025, the Karnataka Congress government suspended two state employees for participating in RSS events, citing violations of service conduct rules mandating political neutrality. Praveen Kumar K.P., a Panchayat Development Officer from Raichur, was suspended on 12 October 2025 after attending an RSS centenary march in uniform. Days later, Pramod Kumar, an assistant cook at a government-run hostel in Bidar, was suspended following a complaint and video evidence of his participation in an RSS rally.

The suspension order stated that their conduct violated Rule 3 of the Karnataka Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 2021, which requires government employees to maintain political neutrality, integrity, and conduct appropriate to their position. However, the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal has since granted an interim stay on his suspension.

(Source: NDTV)

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

“We Never Think Of What Happens To Birds And Animals”: Former Supreme Court Judge AS Oka Gives Gyan On Bursting Crackers And Idol Immersions

Former Supreme Court judge Justice Abhay S. Oka has cautioned against justifying environmental degradation in the name of religion, stating that “no religion allows or condones the degradation of the environment.” Speaking at a lecture titled “Clean Air, Climate Justice and We – Together for a Sustainable Future” organised by the Supreme Court Bar Association, he made an impassioned plea to stop polluting activities carried out under the guise of religious rituals.

“The most crucial reason for our failure to protect the environment is the failure of both citizens and the State to perform their fundamental duty under Article 51A of the Constitution,” Justice Oka said. “Unfortunately, there is a tendency to damage the environment in the name of religion. But if we examine the tenets of all religions, we will find that every religion teaches us to protect the environment and to show compassion to living beings. No religion permits us to destroy the environment or cause cruelty to animals while celebrating festivals.”

‘Can Anyone Say Bursting Crackers Is an Essential Religious Practice?’

Justice Oka refrained from commenting on matters he had adjudicated, including the MC Mehta cases on pollution, but referred to the ongoing public debate on firecrackers. He said, “I said that don’t expect any firecrackers today but I must refer to firecrackers. I will give an example of firecracker bursting in Diwali. It is not confined to Diwali and not to Hindu festivals alone. Many parts of India have seen on the first day of Christian New Year’s firecrackers being burst. They are used in marriages of people belonging to practically all religions.”

He then asked, “Can anyone say that bursting of firecrackers is an essential part of any religion which is protected under our Constitution? When we celebrate festivals, we do it for joy and happiness, when families come together, they exchange gifts and sweets. But the question is, how is there joy and happiness by bursting crackers which cause irritation to the old and infirm and to birds and animals?”

“So the question is whether these activities are protected by Article 25 of the Constitution,” he said. “In my limited knowledge, the answer must be firmly in the negative.”

‘Please Visit the Beaches After Visarjan’

Turning to idol immersions, Justice Oka said, “The second question is whether our religions encourage lakhs to take bath in a river, thereby polluting the river. Please rationally think about it. Please visit the beaches and other parts of Mumbai after the visarjan of Ganpati idols. You can see from your own eyes what kind of damage we cause by immersion of the idols. It is not confined only to Ganpati visarjan. Other religious fests are held on the beaches and lakes.”

He recalled how judicial orders had at times permitted harmful practices: “Unfortunately, our own High Court permitted the making of idols of plaster of Paris taller than six feet, completely contrary to the guidelines laid down by the Central Pollution Control Board. Not only was it permitted, but the High Court also allowed immersion of these bigger idols in the sea, rivers and lakes. I saw the effect of these orders.”

He, however, appreciated civic authorities for creating artificial ponds for immersion, noting a “silver lining” in such efforts though “the public has not yet been convinced to adopt these eco-friendly alternatives.”

‘No Religion Permits Loudspeakers’

Addressing the issue of noise pollution, Justice Oka remarked, “Coming to festivals of all religions, we use loudspeakers causing noise pollution that affects human bodies. The music is so loud that some buildings vibrate, the vehicles vibrate.” He added, “I don’t believe that any religion permits or encourages the use of loudspeakers in celebrating any of these religious festivals. Any religion. For example, the use of loudspeakers for Azaans by mosques — there is a judgment of the Bombay High Court saying that this is not protected under Article 25 and not part of essential religious practice. And it was approved by the Supreme Court.”

“Why do we require loud music to celebrate festivals?” he asked. “Why can’t we realise that it affects human beings, especially the old and infirm? What joy do we get by creating noise pollution either by bursting crackers or by using loudspeakers while celebrating festivals?”

He also pointed out the effect on wildlife: “Human beings can afford to use earplugs, but what about birds and animals? Recently, I read online that for celebrating religious festivals, lights were put on trees which not only destroyed the trees but also the birds. We never think of what happens to birds and animals.”

‘Judges Must Not Be Influenced by Religious or Popular Sentiments’

Justice Oka urged judges to act as role models in protecting the environment. “Judges are also citizens of India. If the Constitution expects all citizens to perform their fundamental duties, it is all the more necessary for judges to do so. They are better equipped than anyone else because they have judicial power to ensure that both citizens and the State perform their duties.”

“When we do justice to the environment as judges,” he added, “we do justice not only to human beings but to all living beings, to the planet Earth itself.”

He cautioned that “judges should not be influenced by popular or religious sentiments. In environmental justice, which is based on fundamental rights and fundamental duties, there is no place for such sentiments unless there is some genuine practice of religion protected by Article 25.” He added, “At least judges should not get affected by religious emotions if they truly want to uphold fundamental rights and protect the environment.”

‘Religion Must Reform Through Science’

Justice Oka said the Constitution calls upon every citizen to develop a scientific temper and spirit of reform. “If any religious practice or celebration continues to cause pollution, we must initiate reforms based on science,” he said. “The duty of developing scientific temper is not against any religion. The Constitution does not tell you not to keep faith in God. It says that you must initiate reforms, and reforms can be initiated only on the basis of science.”

He cited electric crematoriums as examples of reform within tradition. “Hundreds of such examples can be given. In fact, religions survive because of reform. Otherwise, they could not have endured for centuries,” he said.

‘Political Silence and the Moral Role of Courts’

Justice Oka expressed disappointment that few political or religious leaders speak against pollution during festivals. “The most unfortunate part is that we don’t find any political leader making an appeal to the citizens not to create pollution or destroy the environment while celebrating festivals,” he said. “In fact, they encourage it. This applies to all religions.”

He warned that judicial inaction would invite future condemnation. “Article 21 confers the right to live in a pollution-free environment. I can’t say that on the occasion of a religious festival I have the right to create air, noise, or water pollution. That would mean violating someone else’s fundamental right,” he said.

“In today’s scenario, the only institution that can truly protect the environment is the court. But to do so, judges must act without fear or favour, uninfluenced by religion or popular sentiment, and with complete fidelity to the Constitution and to the planet we belong to,” he added.

‘Worried About Dilution of Environmental Laws’

Expressing concern over recent amendments to environmental laws, Justice Oka said he was “worried” about the weakening of enforcement under the Environment (Protection) Act, the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, and the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act. “Surprisingly, the legislature chose to delete the provision to set criminal law in motion by filing a complaint to a magistrate for violation of the Acts,” he noted. “All these provisions have been replaced with monetary penalty. And we must find out the instances where the authorities have enforced the provisions regarding penalty.”

He warned that replacing criminal liability with fines “risks weakening deterrence against polluters and undermines public faith in environmental governance.”

‘Judges Are Also Targeted for Strong Orders’

Justice Oka also voiced concern over hostility faced by environmental activists and judges. “I understand that people may not support, but now they are being targeted,” he said. “In fact, with some sense of responsibility I will say this. Even the judges who pass strong orders are being targeted.”

He concluded that “the common man looks upon judges to perform their fundamental duty and to ensure the enforcement of environmental laws,” calling for judicial courage in upholding citizens’ right to a clean and healthy environment under Article 21.

(Source: LiveLaw)

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

Major Twist In Dharmasthala Conspiracy: Petitioners Who Alleged Rapes And Killings Now Ask Court To Scrap Their Own Case, Seeks Forgery Case Against Masked Man Chinnayya

In a development that could significantly alter the course of the Dharmasthala mass burial case, the very activists who initiated the complaint have approached the Karnataka High Court seeking to quash the First Information Report (FIR) registered based on their own allegations.

The petitioners—Girish Mattennavar, Mahesh Shetty (Thimmarodi), and Jayant T—have requested the court to nullify FIR No. 39/2025, which was filed under Section 211(A) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, at the Dharmastala Police Station. The case involves sensational allegations of mass burials, including the bodies of many women, in forested areas around the renowned temple town.

A Plea to Nullify the Case

The writ petition, filed through advocates, represents a stark reversal from the petitioners’ original position. In their plea, they have urged the High Court to:

  • Quash the primary FIR and all subsequent notices issued by the Special Investigation Team (SIT), including a specific notice dated October 24, 2025.
  • Stay all further proceedings in the case.
  • Nullify the “anti-Dharmasthala conspiracy case” and a separate forgery case registered against the key initial complainant, a masked man named Chinnayya.

Notably, the police had earlier consolidated the allegations of unnatural deaths (the mass burials) and the counter-allegations of a criminal conspiracy into a single FIR.

Furthermore, the petitioners have also challenged the notices issued by the Special Investigation Team (SIT), which is probing the case, summoning them for questioning. They have requested the court to cancel these notices.

Shifting Stance on SIT Investigation

The petitioners’ stance on the SIT has undergone a notable shift. In their initial statements, they had expressed appreciation for the formation of the SIT and had even insisted that a special team investigate their claims. They had reportedly demanded that officer Pranav Mohanty be appointed as the head of the SIT.

However, in their current High Court petition, the individuals have expressed dissatisfaction with the SIT’s investigation. Critics of the petitioners allege that this is an “indirect petition to stop the SIT investigation” now that the probe is reaching its conclusion and they fear arrest.

Context of the Original Complaint

The controversy began when Chinnayya submitted a complaint to the Dakshina Kannada Superintendent of Police, making the grave allegations. He was later arrested on charges of perjury, with police alleging he fabricated his claims. The petitioners, who were associated with the complaint, were subsequently questioned multiple times by the SIT, which has logged over 100 hours of interrogation.

The petitioners’ move comes at a critical juncture in the SIT’s investigation. Sources within the investigation team indicate that the probe has uncovered several inconsistencies in the initial claims made by the complainants. Investigators have also flagged what they describe as a campaign of “widespread misinformation” surrounding the case.

In their petition, the activists have argued that quashing the case is essential to serve the “ends of law and justice.” This marks a dramatic shift from their initial stance, where they had welcomed the formation of the SIT and demanded a thorough investigation.

The High Court’s decision on this petition is now highly anticipated, as it will determine whether the high-profile investigation, which has attracted significant public and media attention, will continue or be brought to an abrupt halt.

(Source: Kannada Asianet News & India Today)

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

‘They Didn’t Let Me Celebrate Diwali, Prayers Of Good People Saved Me’: YouTuber R Varadharajan Who Was Arrested By Stalin Govt For Social Media Post Recounts Ordeal After 21 Days In Jail

madras high court dmk stalin varadharajan karur stampede

R Varadharajan, a 71-year-old former police officer turned political commentator and YouTuber for ‘Nethaji TV’, has broken his silence after spending 21 days in jail, a period he describes as a “gift from the rulers.” He was released on bail on 28 October 2025 night in a case related to a social media post made in 2024.

In an emotional video address posted after his release, a visibly fatigued Varadharajan detailed his ordeal, expressed gratitude to his supporters, and reaffirmed his commitment to independent political criticism.

The Ordeal: Arrested Before Diwali

Varadharajan alleged that his arrest was strategically timed to ensure he could not celebrate the Diwali festival with his family. “The rulers arrested me just a few days before Diwali with the intention of not letting me celebrate the festival with my family,” he stated.

He described this as a profound personal loss, emphasizing the importance of family traditions at his age.

He said, “That I shouldn’t celebrate Deepavali with my family. For that reason, they ensured that I shouldn’t come out for Deepavali, stay in a room in prison, and not even celebrate or know it was Deepavali without even knowing the sign of it. 21 days. They did everything they could to keep me in.”

He recounted the significant physical and mental toll of the incarceration. “There were moments inside when I thought my heart would stop… I have no prior experience with this. At this age, being sent to jail… can you compensate for that? They didn’t consider this for a second,” he shared.

A Cry of Gratitude and Support

Despite his hardship, Varadharajan’s message was filled with gratitude for the support he received. He credited his release to the “prayers of all the good people” like his viewers.

He specifically thanked several individuals and groups who stood by him:

Vijay’s Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK): He expressed his “first thanks” to TVK lawyers and its leader, Vijay, for being present both during his remand and upon his release.

AIADMK Legal Wing: He acknowledged the support offered by the AIADMK’s legal wing secretary, Inbadurai.

Fellow YouTubers and Commentators: He thanked commentators like Kishore Swamy, Karthik Gopinath of Ilayabharatham, and ‘Savukku’ Shankar for using their platforms to speak about his detention and rally public support. He noted that Shankar, despite being criticized by him in the past, supported him on the principle of backing a neutral voice.

“When Kishore Swamy posted about my situation, there were thousands of comments in the video — hundreds of people liking each one. Only then did I realise how many stood by me,” he said. He also thanked his followers from India and abroad for their prayers and support.

Reaffirming His Role as a Critic

Varadharajan used the platform to firmly restate his identity as an impartial political critic. “I am a critic. If there is a mistake, I am a critic who can point it out. In a democratic country, a political critic is an important thing,” he asserted.

He stated that his criticism is not partisan, listing leaders from various parties—including Sasikala, Thol. Thirumavalavan, Premalatha, Vaiko, and Edappadi K. Palaniswami—whom he has criticized in the past. “Whoever does wrong, we will criticize them. I have never taken money from anyone to speak in support or opposition,” he said.

Concluding his address, Varadharajan stated that he needs time to recover from the physical strain of his imprisonment. He promised to return to engage with his audience once his health is restored, signaling that his time in jail has not silenced his voice.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

“Even A Laughter Club Would Become Unlawful”: Karnataka High Court Slams Congress Govt’s Order Restricting Public Gatherings Without Permission

“Even A Laughter Club Would Become Unlawful”: Karnataka High Court Slams Congress Govt's Order Restricting Public Gatherings Without Permission

The Karnataka High Court on 28 October 2025 stayed the State government’s recent order restricting gatherings of ten or more people on public properties such as roads, parks, and playgrounds without prior permission. The Court observed that the order “on the face of it is violative of Article 13(2) of the Constitution of India.”

“Prima facie the Government Order [GO] of October 18, 2025, has taken away the right conferred upon a citizen or citizens under Chapter-III [fundamental rights] of the Constitution of India, that is Article 19(1) (a) and (b), which gives freedom of speech and expression and right for congregation and free movement,” the Court said.

The interim order was passed by Justice M. Nagaprasanna of the Dharwad Bench on a petition filed by several NGOs and individuals from Hubballi and Dharwad, including Punashchetana Seva Samsthe, We Care Foundation, Rajeev Malhar Patil Kulkarni, and Uma Satyajit Chavan. The Court also stayed all consequential orders, notifications, or circulars, if any, issued by the government.

“If this GO is left to be operational during the pendency of the petition, it would in effect be violative of Article 13(2) of the Constitution of India, which indicates that law conferred under fundamental rights can be abridged only by a law,” the Court observed.

The Government Order stated that a gathering of ten or more persons in any public place — including streets, roads, parks, playgrounds, and water bodies — without prior permission would be treated as an “unlawful assembly.” The Court noted that the regulation of assemblies and processions is already governed under the provisions of the Karnataka Police (KP) Act, which regulates the conduct and behaviour of persons in public spaces. Therefore, it held that the October 18 order “can have any semblance of effect of taking away the fundamental rights conferred upon a citizen or citizens under the Constitution.”

Senior advocate Ashok Haranahalli, appearing for the petitioners, argued that the GO was in violation of the KP Act and amounted to curbing fundamental rights through an executive order. He pointed out that “going by the nature and restriction imposed in the GO, it would mean even having a laughter club session or walking in a group in a park would become an ‘unlawful assembly’ if no prior permission was taken.”

Although the order did not explicitly name any organisation, it was widely interpreted as a move to curb the activities of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) on public properties. The speculation arose after Karnataka’s IT-BT Minister Priyank Kharge wrote to Chief Minister Siddaramaiah seeking a ban on RSS activities in government schools, colleges, and other public spaces. The Cabinet approved the issuance of the order shortly thereafter.

The GO had further directed that police register cases — either upon receiving complaints or suo motu — under the provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita against gatherings violating the order.

(Source: The Hindu)

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

“We Are All Rowdies, Police Can’t Pluck A Strand Of Hair”, VCK Cadre Proclaims In An Old Viral Video

“We Are All Rowdies, Police Can't Pluck A Strand Of Hair", VCK Cadre Proclaims In An Old Viral Video

A 2022 video showing Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi (VCK) Arani North District Secretary Baskaran delivering a provocative speech in front of the Tiruvannamalai District Collector’s Office has resurfaced on social media, drawing renewed criticism in the wake of a recent hit-and-run case involving VCK members and party chief Thol. Thirumavalavan.

The video, recorded during a protest held in the aftermath of caste-related violence in Veeralur village near Kalasapakkam, shows Baskaran making aggressive remarks and claiming that VCK members were “ready to create as many rowdies as needed.” His comments, interpreted as threats, have been widely condemned online.

He is seen saying, “Viduthalai Chiruthaigal are powerful people. Act with courage, for we have the power to promote political interests. No police can pluck a h*ir. They cannot pluck a single h*ir (they cannot do absolutely anything). Who are we? We are rowdies. We are all there in the rowdies list. We are ready to become that kind of rowdies. If all are rowdies, what can you do man? You will make a rowdy list, that’s all. You will arrest them, that’s all.”

The 2022 protest followed a communal clash during the Pongal festival in Veeralur, where a dispute over the local cremation ground led to large-scale vandalism targeting homes and vehicles in the Arundhathiyar settlement. Over a hundred people were allegedly involved in the violence. Subsequently, a police operation led by DIG Annie Vijaya and Tiruvannamalai Superintendent of Police Pawan Kumar, with over 800 officers from Tiruvannamalai, Vellore, Tirupattur, and Ranipet districts, restored order.

Police later booked around 250 individuals in connection with the incident and arrested more than 20. Protests were subsequently organized by several parties, including VCK, condemning the violence against members of the Arundhathiyar community.

The resurfaced video comes in the backdrop of the VCK goons behaving like rowdies and thrashing the motorist outside Madras High Court after their chief’s vehicle mildly dashed on to his vehicle.

(Source: ABPLive)

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

The Mamdani Machine: Fox News Exposes How Socialist, Islamist, And Democratic Networks Are Funding And Engineering Zohran Mamdani’s Rise

A Fox News investigation has uncovered a vast political and financial ecosystem powering the rise of Zohran Mamdani, a 34-year-old Democratic Socialist candidate for New York City mayor.

The network, dubbed by investigators as the “Mamdani Machine”, comprises 110 organizations, including socialist entities, Muslim and South Asian advocacy groups, and Democratic Party affiliates. It is reportedly sustained by funding linked to billionaire philanthropists George Soros, the Ford Foundation, and the MacArthur Foundation.

The investigation, conducted by journalist and author Asra Nomani for Fox News and the Daniel Pearl Project, traces Mamdani’s political ascent from student activism to his current mayoral campaign. It alleges that his rise was “politically engineered” through a coordinated alliance of socialists, radical imams, and Democratic operatives, many of whom have been accused of anti-Israel or antisemitic activity.

“For days, I’ve buried myself in 990s, social media posts and insider reports,” Nomani wrote, adding that she has tracked the individuals and groups involved “for 23 years.”

According to Nomani’s findings, the coalition behind Mamdani’s campaign represents a red-green-blue axis – socialists (“red”), Muslim political groups (“green”), and Democratic Party organizations (“blue”) aligned around shared electoral goals.

The 110 Organizations in the Mamdani Machine

The Daniel Pearl Project has published a public database documenting the 110 entities linked to Mamdani’s campaign operations and endorsements.

Socialist And Socialist-Aligned Groups (4):

  1. Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) – EIN 13-3109557, listed as an official Mamdani endorser.
  2. Equality for Flatbush, fiscally sponsored by the Interreligious Foundation for Community Organization (IFCO) – Rev. $1.64 million; IFCO’s executive director Claudia de la Cruz, a Party for Socialism and Liberation leader, was a 2024 U.S. presidential candidate.
  3. New Yorkers for Lower Costs PAC – estimated revenue $1.2 million, identified as the “Official Zohran Mamdani Support PAC.”
  4. Our Revolution – EIN 81-3260391, a national socialist group that endorsed Mamdani in October 2025.

Muslim and South Asian Organizations (30):
The investigation found that 30 Muslim and South Asian groups, including national advocacy bodies, religious centers, and political action committees, are directly tied to Mamdani’s campaign infrastructure. These include:

  1. Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) – National and New York chapters listed in campaign endorsements and press releases dated October 16, 2025.
  2. Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA) – EIN 11-2925751, revenue $5.44 million.
  3. Emgage Action Inc. – EIN 46-5499822, revenue $1.63 million, with an affiliated SuperPAC Defend and Advance ($300,900 revenue).
  4. Muslim Democratic Club of New York (MDCNY) – an incubator for Muslim political power; Mamdani joined its board in 2018.
  5. Masjid Al-Taqwa – led by Imam Siraj Wahhaj, who once served as a character witness for the “Blind Sheikh” convicted in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.
  6. MPower Action – linked to activist Linda Sarsour, who has faced repeated accusations of antisemitism.
  7. Muslim American Society of New York – EIN 20-5285671, revenue $795,882.
  8. Muslim Community Network – EIN 75-3163555, revenue $1.19 million.
  9. Desis Rising Up & Moving (DRUM) – EIN 38-3652741, revenue $1.85 million; focused on organizing working-class Indo-Caribbean and South Asian communities.
  10. Indian American Impact – EIN 38-4054905, revenue $900,583.
  11. Yemeni American Merchants Association (YAMA Action) – EIN 82-3539502, revenue $1.95 million.
  12. Unity and Justice Fund – PAC contributing $100,000 to campaign-related efforts in June 2025.

Other named affiliates include the American Pakistani Advocacy Group, Bangladeshi American Advocacy Group, Bangladeshi Americans for Political Progress, Rockaway Islamic Center, Syosset Muslim Community, New York Muslim Action Network, and Palestinian American Bar Association.

Nomani reports that these organizations form an interlinked ecosystem of religious, ethnic, and ideological advocacy networks overlapping with electoral mobilization operations.

Democratic and Democratic-Aligned Groups (76):
The report identifies 21 DNC affiliates, 22 unions including members of the AFL-CIO, and 33 Democratic-aligned entities such as MoveOn, The Nation, Sunrise Movement, and Working Families Party, described as “one of the important levers in the Mamdani Machine.”

The Timeline of the Mamdani Machine

2012 – Student Activism Begins:
As a student at Bowdoin College, Zohran Mamdani co-founded a campus chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP), the anti-Israel organization founded by activist Hatem Bazian.

2017 – Canvassing with Linda Sarsour:
Mamdani joined Sarsour to campaign for Khader El-Yateem, a DSA-backed city council candidate known for anti-Israel positions. The two developed a close political alliance at a time when Sarsour’s public reputation declined amid antisemitism accusations.

2018 – Entry into Organized Muslim Politics:
Mamdani joined the board of Sarsour’s Muslim Democratic Club of New York, gaining access to donor lists, voter rolls, and grassroots organizing resources. The club’s mission explicitly called on members to “help build Muslim power across the city.”

2018 – Growth of the Nonprofit Empire:
Sarsour and her allies expanded their influence through nonprofit entities MPower Change and Emgage Action, which together received approximately $4.275 million in grants from George Soros’s Open Society Foundations, according to the investigation.

2020 – Electoral Breakthrough:
With support from Sarsour and the Democratic Socialists of America, Mamdani won a seat in the New York State Assembly. That same summer, he appeared at Sarsour’s #MyMuslimVote summit alongside activist Tamika Mallory, a Women’s March cofounder criticized for antisemitic remarks.

2025 – The Mayoral Campaign:
Mamdani’s campaign for mayor is reportedly powered by the coordinated efforts of the 110 organizations identified by the Daniel Pearl Project. His central slogan, “Defend and Advance”, also appears as the name of an Emgage SuperPAC.

According to Nomani, some of these groups receive municipal funding, and this “flow of money to these groups will likely increase if Mamdani wins.”

The Red-Green-Blue Alliance

Nomani characterizes the coalition as an alliance of ideological blocs – socialists (red), Muslims (green), and Democrats (blue) working in tandem under a single strategic objective: political power consolidation within New York and expansion to other key states such as Virginia.

She draws parallels to her book “Woke Army”, which explored the convergence of socialist and Islamist activism within progressive U.S. politics.

“We can see in the Mamdani Machine how these groups have become entrenched within the Democratic Party,” Nomani wrote.

The investigation’s visual map of 110 interlocking organizations is described as “messy and busy,” but intended to demonstrate the scale of coordination across ideological and religious lines.

Donations From Controversial Elements

The New York Post investigation also uncovered that Mamdani’s legal donations include contributions from individuals and groups with controversial backgrounds:

Relatives of China-based billionaire Neville Roy Singham, who has funded radical anti-Israel and Marxist groups, have contributed thousands to Mamdani. His niece, Alicia Goodwin, is a donor and founded “Jews for Zohran.”

Omer Hasan and Mohammad Javed, who each donated $250,000 to a Mamdani-supporting PAC, made their wealth as executives at tech firm AppLovin. Short-selling firm Culper Research has raised national security concerns about the company, noting that Chinese national Hao Tang controls nearly 10% of it.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), via its “Unity & Justice Fund,” directed $100,000 to Mamdani’s campaign. CAIR was named an unindicted co-conspirator in the 2007 Holy Land Foundation terrorism financing trial, where five leaders were convicted of funneling over $12 million to Hamas.

Five staffers of the Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA) contributed $1,300 to the campaign. ICNA, the North American branch of Jamaat-e-Islami, is banned in India and Russia as a terrorist organization. Its former New York head, Ashrafuzzaman Khan, was sentenced to death in absentia for his role in the murder of 18 Bangladeshi intellectuals.

Mamdani’s campaign has raised $4 million in private donations and received $12.7 million in public matching funds, with $6.1 million still on hand less than a month before the election. Most contributions have come from outside New York City.

The city’s Campaign Finance Board declined to comment, noting it is auditing all campaigns citywide.

Mamdani, who rapped “My love to the Holy Land Five/You better look ’em up” in a 2017 song, has been vocal about his socialist policies and criticism of Israel. The findings highlight concerns about the sources of his campaign funding, both legal and illegal, as the election approaches.

Implications

The findings have sparked debate over the intersection of religion, identity politics, and electoral machinery within American urban politics. Critics argue that the Mamdani Machine represents a carefully engineered alliance blending leftist and Islamist political power, with financial underpinnings from major progressive foundations.

(This article is based on an X thread by Asra Nomani)

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

TN Congress Chief Alleges Caste Bias, Irregularities In Water Resources Department; Controversy Over Engineer’s Appointment

Tamil Nadu Congress Committee president Selvaperunthagai has triggered a major controversy after accusing the Water Resources Department (WRD) of caste-based favoritism and administrative irregularities. It is noteworthy that Duraimurugan is the DMK minister of Water Resources department in Tamil Nadu.

His remarks came after he was not invited to the opening ceremony of the Chembarambakkam dam, an event overseen by the department.

Selvaperunthagai alleged that caste considerations dominate postings within the WRD and referred to the presence of “a scoundrel” in the department who, he claimed, influences appointments and operations. The comments have sparked a political storm, prompting scrutiny of recent transfers and promotions within the department.

According to a report by ABP Nadu, several senior engineers expressed discontent over alleged violations of norms in recent appointments. They pointed to two key figures within the department; one said to be close to Water Resources Minister Durai Murugan, and another, Selvakumar, who was recently appointed as Superintending Engineer of the Palar Basin Circle in Chennai.

Selvakumar was promoted under G.O. (2D) No.15 (Water Resources A1 Dept) issued on 2 May 2025 but reportedly declined a subsequent posting as Joint Chief Engineer and went on leave for four months. Despite refusing the higher office position, he was later appointed to his preferred field post as Superintending Engineer through G.O. (D) No.143 (Water Resources A2 Dept) dated 16 October 2025.

Department insiders allege that the appointment was made with direct intervention from Minister Durai Murugan and Water Resources Department Secretary Jayakanthan, bypassing procedural rules. Senior engineers have voiced concern that key positions, including the Chennai Zonal Chief Engineer, Palar Basin Circle Monitoring Engineer, and Kanchipuram Executive Engineer — are being filled by individuals from the same caste, allegedly undermining transparency and departmental fairness.

Image Source: ABP

Sources said that lucrative projects worth nearly ₹14,000 crore including JICA-assisted initiatives and a proposed new dam near Thiruporur fall under the Palar region, leading to speculation that trusted officers have been strategically placed in charge of these projects.

Selvaperunthagai’s supporters argue that his exclusion from the Chembarambakkam event was deliberate, reflecting caste bias against him as a Scheduled Caste leader. They also claim that the dominance of one community in high-ranking WRD positions contradicts the state government’s commitment to social justice.

Responding to the controversy, Department Secretary Jayakanthan, IAS, said that Selvakumar had cited health reasons for declining his earlier posting and was reassigned to the Palar Basin Circle accordingly. He did not respond to other allegations raised about the appointment process.

Senior engineers have urged the Chief Secretary and higher authorities to review the matter, warning that the issue could cause embarrassment to Chief Minister M.K. Stalin and the DMK government if left unaddressed. Selvaperunthagai is said to have discussed the matter directly with the Chief Minister.

(Source: ABPLive Tamil)

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.