Home Blog Page 948

After Targeting Adani Group, Hindenburg Hints At “‘Something Big Soon India’”

US firm Hindenburg posted cryptically on X: "Something big soon India.

After Hindenburg Research, a US-based short selling firm, allegedly earned only $4.1 million from betting against Adani Group securities—an amount insufficient to cover their research costs—they have once again in desperateness posted a cryptic message on their official X account on 10 August 2024: “Something big soon India.”

This development follows Hindenburg’s January 2023 report, which accused the Adani Group of insider trading and stock market violations, leading to a dramatic fall in Adani’s stock prices and reported losses exceeding $100 billion. The Adani Group has consistently denied these allegations, calling them baseless. At their Annual General Meeting in June, Chairman Gautam Adani responded, asserting that the group’s integrity remained unshaken despite the attack.

Additionally, the Supreme Court of India recently rejected a petition for a court-monitored investigation into the Adani-Hindenburg issue, based on a report by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI).

Recent complications have arisen with allegations from Mahesh Jethmalani, a senior Indian lawyer and BJP leader. In July 2024, Jethmalani alleged that an American businessman with Chinese ties, specifically Mark Kingdon of Kingdon Capital Management LLC, had commissioned the Hindenburg report. He claimed that Kingdon and his associate Anla Cheng had used Kotak Mahindra Investments Limited to establish a trading account for short-selling Adani shares. Jethmalani called for an investigation into potential connections between political critics of Adani and China, suggesting that the report might be Chinese retaliation for losing infrastructure projects like the Haifa Port.

On the other hand, SEBI’s show-cause notice to Hindenburg, issued on 26 June 2024, accused the firm of “deliberately sensationalizing and distorting certain facts” in their January 2023 report and collaborating with a New York hedge fund for their short positions. SEBI has given Hindenburg 21 days to respond.

The 46-page notice alleged that Hindenburg and Kingdon established a relationship in autumn 2022, prior to the report’s release, with Kingdon setting up positions in Adani stocks to profit from their decline.

Hindenburg responded by publishing their notice on their website, stating that they made only $4.1 million from their Adani positions. They lamented SEBI for not focusing on the evidence they provided about Adani’s offshore shell entities and financial movements. Hindenburg also pointed out that SEBI’s notice failed to address Kotak Mahindra Bank’s role, which had created and managed the offshore fund structure used by Hindenburg’s partner.

Hindenburg Research LLC – Who Are They?

Hindenburg Research LLC, a New York City-based firm, is recognised for its focus on short-selling strategies. Short sellers are investors who bet against specific stocks by borrowing them, selling them at current market prices, and then repurchasing them later at a lower price to return to the lender, thereby making a profit from the price drop.

The firm is currently under investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice for allegations related to short-selling practices and potential collusion with hedge funds.

Nate Anderson, the founder of Hindenburg Research, is known for his expertise in identifying and capitalizing on corporate crises. The firm’s operations center around uncovering and profiting from corporate failures.

Another short seller, Marc Cohodes, also claimed that Hindenburg obtains information from large funds to support their short trades.

In India, Hindenburg previously targeted Bollywood production company Eros, accusing it of accounting irregularities.

The Adani Group has argued that Hindenburg Research, by its admission, stands to gain financially from a decline in Adani’s share prices.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

TN: TN Waqf Board Claims entire Balasamudram Village in Dindigul

In a striking parallel to the Thiruchendurai village land dispute, another property conflict involving the Tamil Nadu Waqf Board has come to light, this time in the Balasamudram Municipality of Dindigul district. With claims dating back to 2020, the Waqf Board asserts ownership over the entire municipality, leaving around 10,000 residents in limbo. Unable to sell their ancestral properties due to unresolved legalities, the community’s frustration culminated in a petition to local authorities in May 2023.

Still, the deadlock remains, mirroring the challenges faced by those in Thiruchendurai.

Significant yet Underreported dispute with Waqf Board

In a development that didn’t receive much media coverage, this case in Balasamudram is worryingly similar to the Waqf Board claiming ownership of the entire village of Thiruchendurai, which, according to their records, spans 389 acres. Balasamudram Municipality is in the Palani area of the Dindigul district. Due to this claim by the Waqf Board, residents of these villages have been unable to buy or sell their properties.

The Balasamudram Municipality, which comprises 18 wards and approximately 10,000 residents, has been grappling with a property dispute. On 25 May 2023, the residents petitioned Tehsildar Siva Kumar of Palani, requesting a revision of property claims to sell their land—properties that have been in their families for generations. However, the Registration Department has not recognised their ownership, citing Tamil Nadu Waqf Board’s claim as per Re.No 786/2022. The Waqf Board made its claim on Balasamudram on 21 February 2020.

Priyanka, a villagers’ representative, has petitioned the Tehsildar and spoken to the press about the issue. She stated thatthe residents cannot mortgage their lands due to the Waqf Board’s claim. The Registration Department has indicated that the land belongs to the Tamil Nadu Waqf Board based on old VAO records, specifically Survey Number 53/1A, which lists 96 acres as Waqf property. However, discrepancies exist between the Waqf Board’s survey and the patta numbers. The petition to the Tehsildar seeks to address these inconsistencies and facilitate proper land registration.

The situation did not end there. A troubling aspect of the case is that while the villagers have been prevented from registering their lands, the Registration Department has allowed others to buy and sell properties in the same villages. Although the Waqf Board issued a claim notice in 2022, the Palani Registration Department continued processing registrations for Survey Number 53/1A up until March 2023. Petitioner Priyanka has alleged that action should be taken against the officers who facilitated these registrations.

Thiruchendurai Village Claimed As Waqf Property

Rajagopal of Mullikarupur, who owns agricultural land in Thiruchendurai village, agreed to sell 1 acre 2 cents of his land to one Rajarajeshwari. He went to the Joint III Sub-Registrar office in Trichy to arrange the purchase deed for ₹3.5 lakhs and get it registered.

However, the sub-registrar told him that the land could not be registered as it belonged to the Tamil Nadu Waqf Board and that he had to get a ‘No Objection Certificate’ from the state Waqf Board office in Chennai to sell the land. When Rajagopal asked why he needed a NOC from the Waqf Board to sell land he purchased in 1992, the sub-registrar reportedly told him that this is the procedure for deeding any land in Tiruchendurai village.

The Waqf Board has sent a letter to the Registration Department along with documents stating that the entire village belongs to them and that those who come to register a deed for land in the village should get an NOC from them.

He was also shown a copy of the 250-page Waqf Board letter. In that letter, the Waqf Board has said that tens of thousands of acres of land all over Tamil Nadu are theirs. Rajagopal later explained his ordeal to the people of Thiruchendurai village, who are now concerned about the Waqf Board’s takeover of their lands. They have noted that when they already have the revenue department documents, including patta, chitta, adangal, revenue ‘A’ registration, and encumbrance certificate, how can the Waqf Board claim Thiruchenthurai village as its property?

The issue was brought to the notice of the District Collector, who has reportedly assured to look into the matter and decide.

TN Registration Department

Tamil Nadu Government Registration Department officials have said there are encroachments on water bodies, Waqf Board properties, and temple properties. The department claims to have received information that, through forged documents, unrelated persons were holding these lands, and many were embroiled in legal disputes.

“The court criticised the government and directed it to take appropriate steps to recover the assets. Based on that, in 2016, the government took measures to recover the assets. Following this move, the Waqf Boards recovered their properties throughout Tamil Nadu. The Board sorted out what it found to be its assets and notified the department of them. They also asked the registration department to stop any arrangement for the registration of deeds regarding certain properties. It is on this basis that entire villages, including Thiruchendurai and Kadiakurichi, have been identified as Waqf Board properties.”, Registration Department officials were quoted saying in the report.

Officials also noted that they will speak to the Secretary of the Minority Welfare Department and the Chairman of the Waqf Board.

They admitted that it is absurd to refer to Thiruchendurai temple and its lands as Waqf Board properties and that they have been facing problems when deed registrations have to be denied based on the Waqf Board’s letter.

Apart from villages like Thiruchenthurai and Kadiakurichi, regions in and around Chennai also have this problem, where the Waqf Board has claimed lands.

Tamil Nadu Waqf Board

Tamil Nadu Waqf Board is a statutory body established under the Waqf Act 1954 that supervises and manages Waqf institutions and administers Waqf properties.

Waqf properties are those movable and immovable properties dedicated by a person professing Islam for any purpose recognised by Muslim law as pious, religious or charitable.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

Travancore’s Titan: Exploring Marthanda Varma’s Phenomenal Rule In 18th Century

In the early 18th century, when the Dutch and English were vying to control the lucrative spice trade in Kerala, Marthanda Varma emerged as a titan of a king who defeated them, monopolised the spice business and shaped the course of Travancore’s history.

This is the story of how a king who built a great empire gave it all away to Sree Padmanabhaswamy to become a humble ‘Padmanabha Dasa’.

Medieval Kerala

The early 18th century was when medieval Kerala’s political structure was going through a period of turmoil. The state had become decentralised with the Ettuveetil Pillamar (local landlords) and the Madampimar (the barons) calling the shots. The authority of the throne was curbed by the Yogakkar (council of eight and a half), who also managed the Padmanabhaswamy Temple. There was no standing army, and the various royal lineages constantly clashed. This left the field open to the Dutch and English traders to assert their supremacy over the lucrative spice trade, often resorting to blocking the West Coast.

It was in such chaotic times that one man emerged, who defeated the Dutch, founded the kingdom of Travancore, created a modern army on European lines, and established his region’s monopoly over the spice trade.

Anizham Thirunal Marthanda Varma 

He was born in 1706 to Raghava Varma of Kilimanoor and Rani Karthika Thirunal of Attingal in the Trippappur Swaroopam, which was then just a small kingdom, between Edava in the north and Aralvaimozhi in the south. Marthanda Varma would ascend the throne at a time of great crisis.

The then ruler of Venad (present-day Travancore), Rama Varma, was at the mercy of the East India Company and Madurai Nayaks, with whom he had entered into treaties for support against the troublesome nobles in his court.  The British had already set up a factory at Vizhinjam in 1644, while the Ajengo Fort was strengthened in 1695 by them.

The Padmanabhaswamy Temple, on the other hand, was facing a funds crunch. Add to it the Thampi brothers, the sons of Rama Varma, revolted against him, with the help of the Madurai Nayaks.

How Marthanda Rose To Power

Marthanda subdued the revolt and drastically curtailed the powers of the Ettuveetil Pillamar, the Nair aristocracy, and the Yogakkara. Realising that the Dutch power in Kerala stemmed from their monopoly over the spice trade, he turned his attention to Central Kerala, the hub of spice cultivation.

Kollam was conquered in 1731, and annexed, as the strategically important port fell into his hands. Marta soon fell, while the neighbouring principality of Kayamkulam formed an alliance with the Kingdom of Kochi, allying with the Dutch too. However, the Travancore army seized Nedumangadu and Kottarakkara, while the Kayamkulam ruler was killed in 1734.

Marthanda Varma next targeted the Elayadathu Swaroopam( Kottarakara) after the death of its chief, whose princess took refuge in Thekkumkur. The Dutch Governor of Ceylon, Gustaaf Willem van Imhoff, sensing an opportunity, reinstated the princess. However, Marthanda Varma defeated the combined army of Kottarakara and the Dutch in 1741, as the principality was annexed to Travancore.

After consolidating his hold over Travancore, Varma targeted the Dutch forts, capturing them in a series of raids. The Dutch felt threatened by Marthanda Varma’s expansionist policy, as they felt that the British, with whom he had a treaty, would gain the upper hand in the pepper trade here. Gustaaf Van Imhoff, the Dutch Governor, wrote to Varma asking him to stop his campaign. It was the last battle of the Travancore-Dutch war, a series of other battles fought for the supremacy of the West coast, between Travancore and the Dutch supported by smaller kingdoms, who felt threatened by his expansionist policy.

Dutch Action

The Dutch Governor of Ceylon, Gustaaf Willem van Imhoff, visited Kochi in January 1739 and recommended military action to protect their interests. The Dutch in turn organized an alliance of Kochi, Kollam, and Kayamkulam, while van Imhoff personally met Marthanda Varma to negotiate peace. When Imhoff threatened to wage war, Varma shot back saying he had been thinking about invading Europe someday.

The Dutch declared war on Travancore in late 1739, deploying a unit under Captain Johannes Hackert. They had success initially, forcing the Travancore army to retreat from Kollam, and marched all the way up to Attingal and Varkala. However, when they launched another campaign in 1740, the Travancore Army fought back, attacking the Dutch factories, and taking possession of their goods.

Marthanda Varma defeated the Dutch at the historic battle of Colachel on 10 August 1741. The Dutch were utterly routed at Colachel, and most of their soldiers were taken prisoner, including their commander Eustachius De Lannoy. By 14 August 1741, all the Dutch fortifications in the region were captured and they had to retreat to Kochi, which was a total rout for them. It put an end to the Dutch plans to expand on the West Coast and in a way helped in the modernization of the Travancore army too.

He pardoned De Lannoy and Donadi and used their services to modernize their army.  De Lannoy the erstwhile Dutch commander, brought in modern artillery techniques, and firearms to the Travancore army, and trained them in the European military drill tactics. He became the Valia Kapitaan, the Commander in Chief of Travancore, and would play a major role later. 

Revolt in Kayamkulam

Varma still faced trouble from Kayamkulam, who, under Achyuta Warrier, continuously revolted against his rule. Reinforcing his army with the latest cavalry from Tirunelveli, he mounted an assault on Kayamkulam, annexing the principality in 1742 under the Treaty of Mannar.  The Kayamkulam chief however did not yield easily and again countered with an alliance of Kottayam, Kochi, Ambalapuzha, and Changanaserry in 1746.  Varma once again defeated the alliance, and the Kayamkulam ruler fled to Kochi where he took refuge.

In 1753, the principalities of Kottayam, Ambalapuzha, and Changanaserry, along with Meenachil, were annexed to Travancore. The tributary states of Karappuram and Alangad were ceded by the Kochi ruler. With the defeat of the Kozhikode ruler at Purrakada, Marthanda Varma emerged as the most powerful ruler. His kingdom of Travancore extended all the way from Kanyakumari up to Kochi.

He also declared a state monopoly on the spice trade in 1743, dealing a huge blow to Dutch hegemony.

Marthanda Varma as a Ruler

Marthanda Varma was an equally wise ruler, bringing in many changes in the administration, he dismantled the medieval aristocracy, that called the shots, creating a more centralized system of governance. He built up a modern bureaucracy, appointing a Dalava to look after military and economic affairs. The Dalava presided over a vast hierarchy from the Valia Sarvadhi Kariakkars at the top to the Kariakkars, Manikars, and Adhikaris at the lowest level. He introduced new divisions called Adhikaram and Mandapattu Vatukkal.

His other achievement was building up a modern army of 50,000 on European lines.  A key unit of his army was the Travancore Nair Brigade or the Nair Pattalam. Initially, it had only Nairs, but later, other communities were admitted; its first commander was Kumaraswamy Pillai.

This Nair Pattalam was later integrated into the Indian Army as the 9th and 16th Battalions of the Madras Regiment in 1954. During Marthanda Varma’s time, however, they were the sword arm of the Travancore Army and played a crucial role in his campaigns. Artillery batteries were placed along the coast from Purakkad to Kanyakumari, and a series of forts were established for safeguarding.

He also brought about reforms in agriculture, with the development of water harvesting, irrigation projects, and the introduction of commercial crops. He also introduced the system of Kullikanam, by which tax reductions called Naduvukkur and Vettalivu were granted to freshly sown lands.

Sree Padmanabhaswamy Temple

Marthanda Varma renovated the Sree Padmanabhaswamy Temple to the current structure we are familiar with and introduced state ceremonies like Murajapam and Bhadra Deepam. He also reconstructed the main deity, with the earlier one destroyed in a fire during Rama Varma’s reign.

In 1749, he donated his kingdom to Padmanabhaswamy and called himself Padmanabha Dasa. This tradition continued among the Travancore rulers. Thiruvananthapuram became a major city during his reign, and many artists and scholars migrated here.

He also patronised different temple forms, such as Koothu, Padhakam, Kathakali, Thullal, and Koodiyattam. Among his court poets were Ramapurathu Warrier and Kunchan Nambiar.

Although the great ruler passed away in 1758, he left behind a rich legacy with his administrative and economic reforms. His strong army meant that Travancore would successfully resist the invasions of Tipu Sultan later, unlike Malabar, which was devastated.

(This article was originally published in History Under Your Feet Blog and has been republished with permission)

Ratnakar Sadasyalu is a blogger with a passion in movies, music, books, and history. A techie by profession and a writer at heart. Author of City of Victory a book on Vijayanagar Empire.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Andhra Pradesh: Complaint Filed Against SC/ST Vigilance Committee Member Chitekala Salomi For Alleged Misuse Of Position For Construction Of Church

Representative Image

A complaint has been lodged against Chitekala Salomi, a member of the District SC/ST Vigilance & Monitoring Committee in Nandyal, Andhra Pradesh, alleging misuse of her official position. The complaint, submitted by the SC ST Rights Forum to the District Collector of Nandyal, seeks disciplinary action against Salomi and calls for an inquiry into her caste status by the District Level Scrutiny Committee (DLSC).

The allegations stem from a letter Salomi reportedly sent on 16 July 2024 to the Mandal Parishad Development Officer (MPDO) of Bandi Atmakur Mandal, Nandyal District. In the letter, Salomi allegedly warned that those obstructing the construction of a church on agricultural land would face criminal charges under the SC ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The SC ST Rights Forum claims that this intervention was out of Salomi’s purview and constitutes a misuse of her position to favor a specific group.

The construction in question involves a church initiated by the Hosanna Ministries Society on agricultural land at Survey No. 433-1, without the necessary permissions. The complaint references the Andhra Pradesh Agricultural Land (Conversion for Non-Agricultural Purposes) Act, 2006, and the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Department’s G.O M.S No. 376 (2012), which mandates District Collector approval for religious constructions. Local residents had raised concerns with the Gram Panchayat, opposing the alleged illegal construction.

Additionally, the complaint highlights potential issues regarding Salomi’s caste status. It suggests that she may be a practicing Christian while holding an SC caste certificate, which could violate the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order of 1950, and a 2016 Supreme Court judgment. According to the order, a person who professes a religion different from Hinduism, Sikhism, or Buddhism cannot claim Scheduled Caste status.

The SC ST Rights Forum has called for a thorough investigation into these allegations and appropriate disciplinary action against Salomi if the claims are substantiated.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

Opposition Cries Foul On Waqf (Amendment) Bill 2024; DMK’s Kanimozhi Says Mosques In Danger, Dayanidhi Calls It A ‘Land-Grabbing’ Exercise

Opposition leaders, including DMK leaders, criticised the Waqf (Amendment) Bill 2024 introduced in the Lok Sabha by Minority Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju. DMK MP Kanimozhi even claimed that the inclusion of non-Muslims in the Waqf Board would put mosques in danger. Some members called for the bill’s withdrawal, while others suggested a parliamentary committee review it.

Waqf Bill introduced in Lok Sabha

Rijiju introduced the Waqf (Amendment) Bill 2024 in the Lok Sabha on 8 August 2024. This Bill proposes amendments to the Waqf Act of 1995. The bill aims to address issues related to the powers of State Waqf Boards, registration and surveying of waqf properties, and removing encroachments.

As usual, the opposition parties, including Congress, DMK, NCP, Trinamool Congress, and AIMIM, strongly criticised the proposed bill, arguing that its provisions undermine federalism and constitutional principles and play the cards of minority appeasement. While some members called for the bill’s withdrawal, others suggested that a parliamentary committee review it.

Govt response to criticism

In response to the opposition’s concerns, Rijiju emphasised that the government acted on recommendations from a panel established during the Congress-led UPA government.

Kiren Rijiju said, “This bill being brought today is based on the report of Sachar committee which you made (Congress), and the bill has been now titled – ‘United Waqf Act Management, Empowerment, Efficiency and Development Act’, 1995- ‘UMEED’.” 

Rijiju agreed to the suggestion that a parliamentary committee review it. He proposed that a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) be formed to conduct a thorough review of the bill.

Additionally, he introduced the Mussalman Wakf (Repeal) Bill, 2024, which seeks to repeal the Mussalman Wakf Act of 1923.

DMK ministers react

Thoothukkudi DMK MP Kanimozhi disapproved of the bill, stating, “(The bill) is against the constitution, against federalism, against religious minority, and against human beings. It shuns justice in every possible way, this bill violates article 25 and 26 of the constitution which says, ‘we have right to follow a religion and have rights to manage religious affairs’. The bill allows non-Muslims to be a part of Waqf Board.” She then questioned, “Will it be possible for a Muslim or a Christian to be a part of a board which manages a Hindu temple, would you allow that?”

Kanimozhi also argued that the bill infringes upon Article 30 of the constitution, said, “It is a direct violation of Article 30 which deals with minorities to administer their institutions. This bill targets a particular religious group.

Feeling emboldened by the lack of criticism following her speech, Kanimozhi began spreading falsehoods and was met with a stern rebuke in Parliament. Kanimozhi claimed, “We know already that many old mosques are in danger today. Suddenly, there is a PIL (filed). The people and archaeologists are sent there, and they discover that there was a temple before this. Then there is hate and division, followed by these issues (arise) among the people of the country.”

Her conspiracy theory in opposition of the Waqf Bill was swiftly rejected by members of the house, who were keen to prevent her from spreading further misinformation under the guise of appeasing Muslims.

The DMK MP from Central Chennai, Dayanidhi Maran, said.

“I don’t understand why they are continuously trying to irritate the Muslim community, trying to dominate them, trying to show that they are superior. This exercise looks like a land-grabbing exercise. Basically, this Government has not done anything good for the people but is trying to take revenge on the minorities.”

VCK

Chidambaram VCK MP Thol Thirumavalavan said, “I firmly oppose this Bill at its introduction. It appears to be introduced with the intent of undermining national unity and disrupting the existing harmony among communities. It is distressing to see efforts to alienate Muslims, who are part of the Indian fabric, and to interfere with their rights, which is unconstitutional. This bill seeks to strip away the constitutional freedoms and rights that have long been protected. The Waqf Board has operated independently for years, and every religion is entitled to its freedoms under the secular framework of the Indian Constitution.”

“Given this context, it is perilous for the government to take a religiously biased stance and encroach upon religious freedoms, as this could threaten national unity. Therefore, I oppose this bill in its introductory stage and urge its withdrawal. I also request that it be referred to the Standing Committee for a thorough review,” he added.

Kerala Congress

Alappuzha Congress MP KC Venugopal’s drama was at an all-time high in the Parliament. In opposition to the proposed Waqf Bill, he said, “This bill is a fundamental attack on the Constitution…Through this bill, they are putting a provision that non-Muslims also be members of the Waqf governing council. It is a direct attack on freedom of religion…Next, you will go for Christians, then Jains…The people of India will not buy this kind of divisive politics now. We are Hindus, but at the same time, we respect the faith of other religions. This bill is specialised for the Maharashtra and Haryana elections. You do not understand that last time, the people of India taught you a lesson. This is an attack on the federal system.”

AIMIM

Asaduddin Owaisi, chief of the AIMIM and Hyderabad MP, criticised the bill as discriminatory and arbitrary, accusing the government of dividing the nation. He argued that the bill infringes upon the fundamental Right to Freedom of Religion enshrined in the Constitution. His opposition includes a claimed that the Waqf Bill would enable the government to take control not only of Waqf properties but also of dargahs and mosques.

Owaisi contended, “No law limits the right of a person to will their property or dispose of it. But look at what you are doing – Hindus can give complete property to a daughter or son. I, as a Muslim, can only give one-third. I can gift but cannot give it to Allah. You are stopping me from praying. You are restraining work for Allah.”

He particularly criticised the provision that bars individuals who have converted to Islam for less than five years from making donations to Waqf. “To insist that a person has been practising for five years — how can this be verified? Who will decide? Does a new convert have to wait for five years to donate? Isn’t that a violation of the right to freedom of religion?” Owaisi argued, highlighting that such restrictions do not apply to Hindus, Sikhs, or followers of other religions.

Owaisi also accused the bill of violating Constitutional Articles 14 and 15, which guarantee equality before the law and prohibit religious discrimination, respectively. He charged that the government is unqualified to make these amendments and is exacerbating divisions within the country. “This bill violates the principles of Articles 14, 15 and 25 of the Constitution. This bill is both discriminatory and arbitrary. By bringing this bill, you (the Central government) are dividing the nation, not uniting it. This bill is an evidence of the fact that you are an enemy of the Muslims,” Owaisi declared.

Proposed changes to the Waqf Bill

The Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2024 proposes renaming the Waqf Act, 1995, to the Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency, and Development Act, 1995. It aims to redefine “waqf” to include only those who have practised Islam for at least five years and hold ownership of the property. The bill also seeks to ensure that the creation of Waqf-alal-aulad does not negate inheritance rights for women.

Key changes include removing provisions related to “waqf by the user,” assigning the role of Survey Commissioner to a Deputy Collector or equivalent officer, broadening the composition of the Central Waqf Council and State Waqf Boards to include Muslim women and non-Muslims, and establishing a separate Board of Auqaf for Boharas and Aghakhanis.

The bill also proposes to streamline the registration of waqfs via a central portal, clarify the procedures for property mutation according to revenue laws, and reform the Tribunal structure to include two members with appeals to the High Court within ninety days. Additionally, the government plans to withdraw the Waqf Properties (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Bill, 2014, which the previous Congress-led UPA government introduced.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

Ex-DMK Minister Senthil Balaji Faces Money Laundering Charges In Cash-for-Jobs Scam

Senthil Balaji Faces Money Laundering Charges In Cash-for-Jobs Scam
Senthil Balaji Faces Money Laundering Charges In Cash-for-Jobs Scam

A special court in Chennai has framed charges against former Tamil Nadu Minister V. Senthil Balaji under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) concerning an alleged cash-for-jobs scam.

Cash-for-jobs scam

The case pertains to events between 2011 and 2015 when Balaji served as the Transport Minister under the AIADMK government led by the late J. Jayalalithaa. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) claims that Balaji accepted money from job aspirants in exchange for employment in transport corporations during this period.

Balaji, currently a DMK MLA, was arrested by the ED in June 2023 while serving as the Electricity Minister under Chief Minister M.K. Stalin. Following his arrest, he was hospitalised after experiencing chest pain and later underwent heart surgery.

Despite his detention, the Tamil Nadu government retained him in his ministerial position to demonstrate support. However, he resigned in February 2024 after the Madras High Court emphasised the importance of public morality.

The Trial

During the court proceedings on 8 August 2024, Balaji pleaded not guilty to the charges, alleging that the case was driven by political vendetta. He expressed a desire to cross-examine witnesses, but the court adjourned the case to August 16 for the cross-examination to commence. The charges framed against Balaji include generating and knowingly collecting proceeds of crime, as detailed by the prosecution.

The case has drawn significant political attention, with the DMK accusing the BJP of using central agencies like the ED to target political opponents. The BJP, however, denies these allegations, insisting that the ED is acting according to the law. The Supreme Court recently commented on the ED’s low conviction rates under the PMLA, highlighting the ongoing debate surrounding the agency’s actions.

(With inputs from The Hindu)

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

Madras High Court Quashes Goondas Act Detention Of YouTuber Savukku Shankar

Madras High Court To Hear YouTuber Savukku Shankar's Bail Plea Tomorrow

On 9 August 2024, the Madras High Court quashed a Goondas Act detention order against YouTuber ‘Savukku’ Shankar, also known as A. Shankar, which had been issued by the Greater Chennai City Commissioner of Police on 12 May 2024. The order had placed Shankar under detention according to the Goondas Act for allegedly engaging in activities that were deemed harmful to public order.

A Division Bench consisting of Justices S.M. Subramaniam and V. Sivagnanam ruled in favour of a habeas corpus petition filed by Shankar’s mother, A. Kamala, challenging the legality of her son’s detention. The court ordered that Shankar be released immediately, provided he was not required for detention in connection with any other cases.

Savukku Shankar’s YouTube interview

Shankar had been initially arrested on 4 May 2024 following a criminal complaint lodged by the Coimbatore cyber-crime police.

The complaint stemmed from comments he made during a YouTube interview, which allegedly disparaged the conduct of women police officers.

Following his arrest, several additional cases were filed against him. Consequently, the Commissioner invoked the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, commonly known as the Goondas Act. The Act is designed to detain individuals involved in various offences, including cybercrime and activities prejudicial to public order.

Although the Supreme Court had earlier granted Shankar interim bail in the preventive detention case, he remained in custody due to his formal arrest in several other criminal cases while detained at Puzhal Central Prison.

Court’s criticism of the Goondas Act misuse

On 6 August 2024, the Court scrutinised the DMK-led Tamil Nadu government’s decision to detain Shankar under the Goondas Act, questioning whether the action was selective.

Justices SM Subramaniam and V Sivagnanam said preventive detention is a colonial-era law and should be employed cautiously. They warned that suppressing the voices of media professionals and YouTubers could revert the country to colonial practices.

The court remarked, “Preventive detention is a colonial law. Detaining power should be used sparingly. If the voices of YouTubers and media people are strangulated, we’ll return to colonial times. Media is the fourth pillar of democracy.”

 

(With inputs from The Hindu)

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

DMK-Supporting Dravidian Stocks Simp For Pakistani Athlete As Neeraj Chopra Gets Silver

In a dramatic Olympic final, India’s “Golden Boy” Neeraj Chopra, who had won gold in Tokyo Olympica, ended up with a silver medal in javelin throw this time, achieving his best throw of 89.45 meters. The competition took a more somber turn for Indian fans as Pakistan’s Arshad Nadeem clinched gold with an Olympic record throw of 92.97 meters. This victory marked Pakistan’s first-ever individual gold medal at the Olympics.

While many Indian fans were disheartened, they supported Neeraj Chopra and hoped for his future success. However, surprising reactions emerged from Tamil Nadu, where Dravidianists and DMK sympathisers celebrated Arshad Nadeem as if he were a symbol of pride for India.

One Dravidianist handle shared a video stated, “Pride of the Indian subcontinent..! #ArshadNadeem Congratulations again brother!! #Paris2024.”

The same sympathizer shared another post on X stating, “The beast .. 92.97M new Olympic record! Congratulations #Arshad_Nadheem.

Another sympathizer who is also a Congress member expressed her pride by stating, “Sanghis are unhappy not because Neeraj got Silver, but because Arshad got gold. Bigots!” In this comment, she labeled Indians who were disappointed by Neeraj Chopra’s silver medal as “Sanghi,” a term often used to refer to BJP supporters, while themselves openly celebrating Pakistan’s victory.

Another Dravidian stock journalist from Galatta.com, Devendran Palanisamy, shared his joy stating, “Pakistan’s Arshad Nadeem sets new Olympic record in javelin.”

The post celebrating the Pakistani athlete by Dravidian supporters was met with considerable backlash, as netizens flocked to the comments section to register strong criticism. They ridiculed the anti-India sentiments and divisive politics being promoted, sharply countering the celebratory tone of the original post.

One netizen pointed out whether the Dravidianists didn’t feel proud when Neeraj Chopra got a silver medal but instead they boasted that Pakistani Arshad got the gold. One netizen criticized the focus on Arshad Nadeem’s gold medal over Neeraj Chopra’s silver, saying, “You are such a shameless clown. You have problems with Indians but your heart is filled with love for these ter***** (terrorists).”

https://twitter.com/BholisSoul/status/1821778999367860290

Another netizen noted that, “Pakistanis are less happy for Nadeem then Anti India Communist Bigots are those who are happy for Nadeem and making him a hero He belongs to Pakistan, Pakistan is an enemy country, Pakistan killed thousands of Indians in war and terror.

Another netizen stated, “Wow you’re such a mind reader! Thu! I enjoyed watching Arshad get the gold with that Olympic record throw but India- Pakistan rivalry is 75 years old though and Neeraj has set a bar before and that’s why we were disappointed. But then again why would you know? We aren’t traitors like you who wanted India to get only Silver so that Pakistan could get Gold!

Another netizens criticized stating, “Dravidians celebrating pakistan winning and india losing.. Wow”

Another netizen noting the Dravidian stocks anti-Indian sentiments stated, “congrats to Him but your over enthusiasm and joy on Pakistan’s win isn’t surprising.”

Another netizen angrily remarked, “You anti-national & ISLAMIC FUNDAMENTALS & JIHADI supporter – at least in the same breath why not Congratulate Neeraj..Oh, he is HINDU… and you are not just anti-national, but also HINDUPHOBIC, HATER of HINDUS, SANATANA DHARMA & HINDUISM.”

This support for Pakistan’s athlete is not unprecedented among Dravidianist supporters. Previously, similar instances have occurred, such as when the M.A. Chidambaram Stadium in Chepauk, October 2023, saw police preventing fans from carrying Indian flags during a cricket match between Pakistan and Afghanistan, with DMK ministers backing the ban on the Indian flag in matches where India did not play.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

Hindu Munnani Calls For Statewide Protest Against Violence In Bangladesh As Islamist Extremists Target Minority Hindu Community

In response to the brutal atrocities against the Hindu community in Bangladesh, the Hindu Munnani announced a statewide protest demonstration against violence perpetrated by Islamist extremists, and to rally support for Bangladeshi Hindus against these attacks. The demonstration will take place on 11 August 2024 in Tamil Nadu.

What is happening to Hindus in Bangladesh?

Amid the escalating chaos in Bangladesh, where Islamist extremists are exploiting political instability to launch brutal violence against the minority Hindu community, reports are emerging of widespread brutality. Islamist mobs are attacking Hindu homes, setting them ablaze, and abducting women, plunging the region into an alarming state of anarchy. Hindu institutions, including ISKCON and the Kali temple, have been targeted, forcing many devotees into hiding.

Hindu Munnani demonstration against Hindu persecution

In response to this crisis, the Hindu Munnani has called for a statewide demonstration to protest the violence perpetrated by Islamist extremists and to rally support against these attacks on 11 August 2024.

In a statement released by the Hindu Munnani chief Kadeswara Subramaniam stated, “Bangladesh, once called as East Pakistan, gained independence with significant assistance from India during its struggle against Pakistani brutality. India has continued to support Bangladesh’s development in various ways. However, recent events reveal to the world that no matter how much help is given, fundamentalist fanaticism are not grateful.

Initially, the riots in Bangladesh were reported to be related to reservations. However, it has since become clear that the situation is different. The violence has been unleashed on Hindus, with Hindu institutions being looted and temples set on fire. A Hindu councilor was murdered, and his home was set on fire because he was a former Hindu cricketer. Given the widespread and indiscriminate attacks on Hindus and their places of worship, how will those who opposed the Indian Citizenship Act (CAA) address the violence targeting Hindus in Bangladesh?

India should provide refuge to those fleeing of violence in the name of religion, recognizing that their survival is paramount right? However, Islamic fundamentalists are systematically infiltrating India from Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Bangladesh which was created as a Islamic states. It is important for our people to understand that I.N.D.I alliance who have criticized the CAA and treated them equal to the refugee.

The current brutal violence in Bangladesh endangers the lives of Hindus. The United Nations (UN) must act to prevent further sectarian violence and deploy international troops to quell the unrest. Silence in the face of such evil is unacceptable; decisive action is required from both the UN and the Indian government to support and protect Hindus in Bangladesh, ensuring they receive adequate relief and security.

The United Nations (UN) must intervene urgently to protect Hindus from ongoing threats and violence. International troops should be deployed immediately to address and suppress the racist and sectarian riots. What good will it do to remain silent when evil is being done right in front of your eyes and then to consult and express your regret. Therefore, the UN and the Government of India should immediately take appropriate measures to give morale to the Hindus in Bangladesh.

Adequate relief and permanent protection should be provided to the affected people. Similarly, at this time many people are spreading separatist and anti-national ideas that there should be a people’s revolt in India as well. Their aim is that our country should not progress, people of our country should not live in peace, quarrels to be rampant and they are acting with the nefarious aim of gaining political gains if the country reaches a state of unrest. Such evil minded people should be identified and strict action should be taken immediately under national security laws. The central government should immediately intervene in this matter and stop the attacks against Hindus in Bangladesh and ensure the safety of Hindus. The Hindu Front is going to hold a statewide demonstration on Monday 11 August 24 to condemn these inhuman acts of violence and demand justice for the Hindus in Bengal. I request all people to participate and support this demonstration.”

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

“Why Not Claim The Taj Mahal As Waqf Property?”, MP High Court Rips Into Waqf Board’s Claim On Burhanpur Monuments

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rips Into MP Waqf Board’s Claim on Burhanpur Monuments Why Not Claim the Taj Mahal and All of India as Waqf Property

The Madhya Pradesh (MP) High Court overturned the State Waqf Board’s claim on historical monuments in Burhanpur, even as the judge commented ironically that if the Board had its way, it would claim the Taj Mahal and the rest of India as a Waqf property.

Waqf Board decision on Burhanpur monuments

The court overturned a decision by the MP Waqf Board on 7 August 2024, which classified the Tomb of Shah Shuja, the Tomb of Nadir Shah, Bibi Sahib’s Masjid, and the palace within the Fort of Burhanpur under the control and administration of the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) as Waqf property.

In 2013, the Waqf Board instructed the Archaeological Survey of India to vacate these sites, asserting ownership. The ASI, however, challenged this order through a writ petition, arguing that the sites—located in Emagird village, Burhanpur, and spanning about 4.448 hectares—were protected under the Ancient Monuments Preservation Act of 1904 and had been under their care for decades. The ASI contended that the designation as protected monuments could not be altered to waqf property without officially removing their protected status.

Conversely, the Waqf Board argued that its declaration of the property as waqf was valid and that the ASI should have appealed to the Waqf Tribunal rather than the high court.

The Trial

On 26 July 2024, Justice GS Ahluwalia’s bench noted that the properties had been officially designated as ancient monuments as early as 1913 and 1925 under the Ancient Monuments Preservation Act of 1904. There was no evidence indicating that this status had been revoked or altered according to Section 11 of the same Act.

The court highlighted that the Waqf Board’s claim was based on a notification under Section 5(2) of the Waqf Act, 1995. However, the Board failed to provide a complete notification to the court. Even though other parties did not contest this notification, the Board could not identify any legal basis for invalidating the earlier protections granted by the Ancient Monuments Preservation Act, 1904, without formal release by the Central Government or the Commissioner.

Referencing the Supreme Court’s ruling in Karnataka Board of Wakf vs. Government of India (2004), which affirmed that the Government of India maintains properties listed as Ancient Protected Monuments, the court agreed with the ASI’s position. It concluded that the Waqf Board’s notification was erroneous. Once a property is designated as an ancient monument and protected, it could not be retroactively classified as waqf property under the Waqf Act, 1995. Consequently, any such notification does not nullify the protections granted by the Ancient Monuments Preservation Act, 1904.

The High Court held that, “An erroneous notification issued in respect of property which is not an existing waqf property on the date of commencement of Waqf Act, wound not make it a waqf property thereby giving jurisdiction to the waqf Board to seek eviction of the Central Government from ancient and protected monuments.

“Why not claim the Taj Mahal as Waqf property?”

The court determined that the CEO of the MP Waqf Board had acted improperly in declaring the monuments as waqf property and ordering the ASI’s eviction.

Justice GS Ahluwalia remarked, “Why not claim the Taj Mahal as Waqf property? Tomorrow, you might say that the entire India is Waqf property. It won’t work like this that you’ll issue notifications and the property will be yours.”  As a result, the court nullified the CEO’s order from 19 July 2013.

(With inputs from Law Beat)

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.