Facebook Instagram X Youtube
Thursday, May 21, 2026
Facebook Instagram X Youtube
Home Blog Page 853

Opposition Cries Foul On Waqf (Amendment) Bill 2024; DMK’s Kanimozhi Says Mosques In Danger, Dayanidhi Calls It A ‘Land-Grabbing’ Exercise

By
The Commune
-

Opposition leaders, including DMK leaders, criticised the Waqf (Amendment) Bill 2024 introduced in the Lok Sabha by Minority Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju. DMK MP Kanimozhi even claimed that the inclusion of non-Muslims in the Waqf Board would put mosques in danger. Some members called for the bill’s withdrawal, while others suggested a parliamentary committee review it.

Waqf Bill introduced in Lok Sabha

Rijiju introduced the Waqf (Amendment) Bill 2024 in the Lok Sabha on 8 August 2024. This Bill proposes amendments to the Waqf Act of 1995. The bill aims to address issues related to the powers of State Waqf Boards, registration and surveying of waqf properties, and removing encroachments.

As usual, the opposition parties, including Congress, DMK, NCP, Trinamool Congress, and AIMIM, strongly criticised the proposed bill, arguing that its provisions undermine federalism and constitutional principles and play the cards of minority appeasement. While some members called for the bill’s withdrawal, others suggested that a parliamentary committee review it.

Govt response to criticism

In response to the opposition’s concerns, Rijiju emphasised that the government acted on recommendations from a panel established during the Congress-led UPA government.

Kiren Rijiju said, “This bill being brought today is based on the report of Sachar committee which you made (Congress), and the bill has been now titled – ‘United Waqf Act Management, Empowerment, Efficiency and Development Act’, 1995- ‘UMEED’.” 

Rijiju agreed to the suggestion that a parliamentary committee review it. He proposed that a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) be formed to conduct a thorough review of the bill.

Additionally, he introduced the Mussalman Wakf (Repeal) Bill, 2024, which seeks to repeal the Mussalman Wakf Act of 1923.

DMK ministers react

Thoothukkudi DMK MP Kanimozhi disapproved of the bill, stating, “(The bill) is against the constitution, against federalism, against religious minority, and against human beings. It shuns justice in every possible way, this bill violates article 25 and 26 of the constitution which says, ‘we have right to follow a religion and have rights to manage religious affairs’. The bill allows non-Muslims to be a part of Waqf Board.” She then questioned, “Will it be possible for a Muslim or a Christian to be a part of a board which manages a Hindu temple, would you allow that?”

Kanimozhi also argued that the bill infringes upon Article 30 of the constitution, said, “It is a direct violation of Article 30 which deals with minorities to administer their institutions. This bill targets a particular religious group.”

Feeling emboldened by the lack of criticism following her speech, Kanimozhi began spreading falsehoods and was met with a stern rebuke in Parliament. Kanimozhi claimed, “We know already that many old mosques are in danger today. Suddenly, there is a PIL (filed). The people and archaeologists are sent there, and they discover that there was a temple before this. Then there is hate and division, followed by these issues (arise) among the people of the country.”

Her conspiracy theory in opposition of the Waqf Bill was swiftly rejected by members of the house, who were keen to prevent her from spreading further misinformation under the guise of appeasing Muslims.

The DMK MP from Central Chennai, Dayanidhi Maran, said.

“I don’t understand why they are continuously trying to irritate the Muslim community, trying to dominate them, trying to show that they are superior. This exercise looks like a land-grabbing exercise. Basically, this Government has not done anything good for the people but is trying to take revenge on the minorities.”

VCK

Chidambaram VCK MP Thol Thirumavalavan said, “I firmly oppose this Bill at its introduction. It appears to be introduced with the intent of undermining national unity and disrupting the existing harmony among communities. It is distressing to see efforts to alienate Muslims, who are part of the Indian fabric, and to interfere with their rights, which is unconstitutional. This bill seeks to strip away the constitutional freedoms and rights that have long been protected. The Waqf Board has operated independently for years, and every religion is entitled to its freedoms under the secular framework of the Indian Constitution.”

“Given this context, it is perilous for the government to take a religiously biased stance and encroach upon religious freedoms, as this could threaten national unity. Therefore, I oppose this bill in its introductory stage and urge its withdrawal. I also request that it be referred to the Standing Committee for a thorough review,” he added.

Kerala Congress

Alappuzha Congress MP KC Venugopal’s drama was at an all-time high in the Parliament. In opposition to the proposed Waqf Bill, he said, “This bill is a fundamental attack on the Constitution…Through this bill, they are putting a provision that non-Muslims also be members of the Waqf governing council. It is a direct attack on freedom of religion…Next, you will go for Christians, then Jains…The people of India will not buy this kind of divisive politics now. We are Hindus, but at the same time, we respect the faith of other religions. This bill is specialised for the Maharashtra and Haryana elections. You do not understand that last time, the people of India taught you a lesson. This is an attack on the federal system.”

AIMIM

Asaduddin Owaisi, chief of the AIMIM and Hyderabad MP, criticised the bill as discriminatory and arbitrary, accusing the government of dividing the nation. He argued that the bill infringes upon the fundamental Right to Freedom of Religion enshrined in the Constitution. His opposition includes a claimed that the Waqf Bill would enable the government to take control not only of Waqf properties but also of dargahs and mosques.

Owaisi contended, “No law limits the right of a person to will their property or dispose of it. But look at what you are doing – Hindus can give complete property to a daughter or son. I, as a Muslim, can only give one-third. I can gift but cannot give it to Allah. You are stopping me from praying. You are restraining work for Allah.”

He particularly criticised the provision that bars individuals who have converted to Islam for less than five years from making donations to Waqf. “To insist that a person has been practising for five years — how can this be verified? Who will decide? Does a new convert have to wait for five years to donate? Isn’t that a violation of the right to freedom of religion?” Owaisi argued, highlighting that such restrictions do not apply to Hindus, Sikhs, or followers of other religions.

Owaisi also accused the bill of violating Constitutional Articles 14 and 15, which guarantee equality before the law and prohibit religious discrimination, respectively. He charged that the government is unqualified to make these amendments and is exacerbating divisions within the country. “This bill violates the principles of Articles 14, 15 and 25 of the Constitution. This bill is both discriminatory and arbitrary. By bringing this bill, you (the Central government) are dividing the nation, not uniting it. This bill is an evidence of the fact that you are an enemy of the Muslims,” Owaisi declared.

Proposed changes to the Waqf Bill

The Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2024 proposes renaming the Waqf Act, 1995, to the Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency, and Development Act, 1995. It aims to redefine “waqf” to include only those who have practised Islam for at least five years and hold ownership of the property. The bill also seeks to ensure that the creation of Waqf-alal-aulad does not negate inheritance rights for women.

Key changes include removing provisions related to “waqf by the user,” assigning the role of Survey Commissioner to a Deputy Collector or equivalent officer, broadening the composition of the Central Waqf Council and State Waqf Boards to include Muslim women and non-Muslims, and establishing a separate Board of Auqaf for Boharas and Aghakhanis.

The bill also proposes to streamline the registration of waqfs via a central portal, clarify the procedures for property mutation according to revenue laws, and reform the Tribunal structure to include two members with appeals to the High Court within ninety days. Additionally, the government plans to withdraw the Waqf Properties (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Bill, 2014, which the previous Congress-led UPA government introduced.

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

Ex-DMK Minister Senthil Balaji Faces Money Laundering Charges In Cash-for-Jobs Scam

By
The Commune
-
Senthil Balaji Faces Money Laundering Charges In Cash-for-Jobs Scam
Senthil Balaji Faces Money Laundering Charges In Cash-for-Jobs Scam

A special court in Chennai has framed charges against former Tamil Nadu Minister V. Senthil Balaji under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) concerning an alleged cash-for-jobs scam.

Cash-for-jobs scam

The case pertains to events between 2011 and 2015 when Balaji served as the Transport Minister under the AIADMK government led by the late J. Jayalalithaa. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) claims that Balaji accepted money from job aspirants in exchange for employment in transport corporations during this period.

Balaji, currently a DMK MLA, was arrested by the ED in June 2023 while serving as the Electricity Minister under Chief Minister M.K. Stalin. Following his arrest, he was hospitalised after experiencing chest pain and later underwent heart surgery.

Despite his detention, the Tamil Nadu government retained him in his ministerial position to demonstrate support. However, he resigned in February 2024 after the Madras High Court emphasised the importance of public morality.

The Trial

During the court proceedings on 8 August 2024, Balaji pleaded not guilty to the charges, alleging that the case was driven by political vendetta. He expressed a desire to cross-examine witnesses, but the court adjourned the case to August 16 for the cross-examination to commence. The charges framed against Balaji include generating and knowingly collecting proceeds of crime, as detailed by the prosecution.

The case has drawn significant political attention, with the DMK accusing the BJP of using central agencies like the ED to target political opponents. The BJP, however, denies these allegations, insisting that the ED is acting according to the law. The Supreme Court recently commented on the ED’s low conviction rates under the PMLA, highlighting the ongoing debate surrounding the agency’s actions.

(With inputs from The Hindu)

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

Madras High Court Quashes Goondas Act Detention Of YouTuber Savukku Shankar

By
The Commune
-
Madras High Court To Hear YouTuber Savukku Shankar's Bail Plea Tomorrow

On 9 August 2024, the Madras High Court quashed a Goondas Act detention order against YouTuber ‘Savukku’ Shankar, also known as A. Shankar, which had been issued by the Greater Chennai City Commissioner of Police on 12 May 2024. The order had placed Shankar under detention according to the Goondas Act for allegedly engaging in activities that were deemed harmful to public order.

A Division Bench consisting of Justices S.M. Subramaniam and V. Sivagnanam ruled in favour of a habeas corpus petition filed by Shankar’s mother, A. Kamala, challenging the legality of her son’s detention. The court ordered that Shankar be released immediately, provided he was not required for detention in connection with any other cases.

Savukku Shankar’s YouTube interview

Shankar had been initially arrested on 4 May 2024 following a criminal complaint lodged by the Coimbatore cyber-crime police.

The complaint stemmed from comments he made during a YouTube interview, which allegedly disparaged the conduct of women police officers.

Following his arrest, several additional cases were filed against him. Consequently, the Commissioner invoked the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, commonly known as the Goondas Act. The Act is designed to detain individuals involved in various offences, including cybercrime and activities prejudicial to public order.

Although the Supreme Court had earlier granted Shankar interim bail in the preventive detention case, he remained in custody due to his formal arrest in several other criminal cases while detained at Puzhal Central Prison.

Court’s criticism of the Goondas Act misuse

On 6 August 2024, the Court scrutinised the DMK-led Tamil Nadu government’s decision to detain Shankar under the Goondas Act, questioning whether the action was selective.

Justices SM Subramaniam and V Sivagnanam said preventive detention is a colonial-era law and should be employed cautiously. They warned that suppressing the voices of media professionals and YouTubers could revert the country to colonial practices.

The court remarked, “Preventive detention is a colonial law. Detaining power should be used sparingly. If the voices of YouTubers and media people are strangulated, we’ll return to colonial times. Media is the fourth pillar of democracy.”

 

(With inputs from The Hindu)

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

DMK-Supporting Dravidian Stocks Simp For Pakistani Athlete As Neeraj Chopra Gets Silver

By
The Commune
-

In a dramatic Olympic final, India’s “Golden Boy” Neeraj Chopra, who had won gold in Tokyo Olympica, ended up with a silver medal in javelin throw this time, achieving his best throw of 89.45 meters. The competition took a more somber turn for Indian fans as Pakistan’s Arshad Nadeem clinched gold with an Olympic record throw of 92.97 meters. This victory marked Pakistan’s first-ever individual gold medal at the Olympics.

While many Indian fans were disheartened, they supported Neeraj Chopra and hoped for his future success. However, surprising reactions emerged from Tamil Nadu, where Dravidianists and DMK sympathisers celebrated Arshad Nadeem as if he were a symbol of pride for India.

One Dravidianist handle shared a video stated, “Pride of the Indian subcontinent..! #ArshadNadeem Congratulations again brother!! #Paris2024.”

The same sympathizer shared another post on X stating, “The beast .. 92.97M new Olympic record! Congratulations #Arshad_Nadheem.“

Another sympathizer who is also a Congress member expressed her pride by stating, “Sanghis are unhappy not because Neeraj got Silver, but because Arshad got gold. Bigots!” In this comment, she labeled Indians who were disappointed by Neeraj Chopra’s silver medal as “Sanghi,” a term often used to refer to BJP supporters, while themselves openly celebrating Pakistan’s victory.

Another Dravidian stock journalist from Galatta.com, Devendran Palanisamy, shared his joy stating, “Pakistan’s Arshad Nadeem sets new Olympic record in javelin.”

The post celebrating the Pakistani athlete by Dravidian supporters was met with considerable backlash, as netizens flocked to the comments section to register strong criticism. They ridiculed the anti-India sentiments and divisive politics being promoted, sharply countering the celebratory tone of the original post.

One netizen pointed out whether the Dravidianists didn’t feel proud when Neeraj Chopra got a silver medal but instead they boasted that Pakistani Arshad got the gold. One netizen criticized the focus on Arshad Nadeem’s gold medal over Neeraj Chopra’s silver, saying, “You are such a shameless clown. You have problems with Indians but your heart is filled with love for these ter***** (terrorists).”

https://twitter.com/BholisSoul/status/1821778999367860290

Another netizen noted that, “Pakistanis are less happy for Nadeem then Anti India Communist Bigots are those who are happy for Nadeem and making him a hero He belongs to Pakistan, Pakistan is an enemy country, Pakistan killed thousands of Indians in war and terror.”

Another netizen stated, “Wow you’re such a mind reader! Thu! I enjoyed watching Arshad get the gold with that Olympic record throw but India- Pakistan rivalry is 75 years old though and Neeraj has set a bar before and that’s why we were disappointed. But then again why would you know? We aren’t traitors like you who wanted India to get only Silver so that Pakistan could get Gold!”

Another netizens criticized stating, “Dravidians celebrating pakistan winning and india losing.. Wow”

Another netizen noting the Dravidian stocks anti-Indian sentiments stated, “congrats to Him but your over enthusiasm and joy on Pakistan’s win isn’t surprising.”

Another netizen angrily remarked, “You anti-national & ISLAMIC FUNDAMENTALS & JIHADI supporter – at least in the same breath why not Congratulate Neeraj..Oh, he is HINDU… and you are not just anti-national, but also HINDUPHOBIC, HATER of HINDUS, SANATANA DHARMA & HINDUISM.”

This support for Pakistan’s athlete is not unprecedented among Dravidianist supporters. Previously, similar instances have occurred, such as when the M.A. Chidambaram Stadium in Chepauk, October 2023, saw police preventing fans from carrying Indian flags during a cricket match between Pakistan and Afghanistan, with DMK ministers backing the ban on the Indian flag in matches where India did not play.

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

Hindu Munnani Calls For Statewide Protest Against Violence In Bangladesh As Islamist Extremists Target Minority Hindu Community

By
The Commune
-

In response to the brutal atrocities against the Hindu community in Bangladesh, the Hindu Munnani announced a statewide protest demonstration against violence perpetrated by Islamist extremists, and to rally support for Bangladeshi Hindus against these attacks. The demonstration will take place on 11 August 2024 in Tamil Nadu.

What is happening to Hindus in Bangladesh?

Amid the escalating chaos in Bangladesh, where Islamist extremists are exploiting political instability to launch brutal violence against the minority Hindu community, reports are emerging of widespread brutality. Islamist mobs are attacking Hindu homes, setting them ablaze, and abducting women, plunging the region into an alarming state of anarchy. Hindu institutions, including ISKCON and the Kali temple, have been targeted, forcing many devotees into hiding.

Hindu Munnani demonstration against Hindu persecution

In response to this crisis, the Hindu Munnani has called for a statewide demonstration to protest the violence perpetrated by Islamist extremists and to rally support against these attacks on 11 August 2024.

In a statement released by the Hindu Munnani chief Kadeswara Subramaniam stated, “Bangladesh, once called as East Pakistan, gained independence with significant assistance from India during its struggle against Pakistani brutality. India has continued to support Bangladesh’s development in various ways. However, recent events reveal to the world that no matter how much help is given, fundamentalist fanaticism are not grateful.

Initially, the riots in Bangladesh were reported to be related to reservations. However, it has since become clear that the situation is different. The violence has been unleashed on Hindus, with Hindu institutions being looted and temples set on fire. A Hindu councilor was murdered, and his home was set on fire because he was a former Hindu cricketer. Given the widespread and indiscriminate attacks on Hindus and their places of worship, how will those who opposed the Indian Citizenship Act (CAA) address the violence targeting Hindus in Bangladesh?

India should provide refuge to those fleeing of violence in the name of religion, recognizing that their survival is paramount right? However, Islamic fundamentalists are systematically infiltrating India from Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Bangladesh which was created as a Islamic states. It is important for our people to understand that I.N.D.I alliance who have criticized the CAA and treated them equal to the refugee.

The current brutal violence in Bangladesh endangers the lives of Hindus. The United Nations (UN) must act to prevent further sectarian violence and deploy international troops to quell the unrest. Silence in the face of such evil is unacceptable; decisive action is required from both the UN and the Indian government to support and protect Hindus in Bangladesh, ensuring they receive adequate relief and security.

The United Nations (UN) must intervene urgently to protect Hindus from ongoing threats and violence. International troops should be deployed immediately to address and suppress the racist and sectarian riots. What good will it do to remain silent when evil is being done right in front of your eyes and then to consult and express your regret. Therefore, the UN and the Government of India should immediately take appropriate measures to give morale to the Hindus in Bangladesh.

Adequate relief and permanent protection should be provided to the affected people. Similarly, at this time many people are spreading separatist and anti-national ideas that there should be a people’s revolt in India as well. Their aim is that our country should not progress, people of our country should not live in peace, quarrels to be rampant and they are acting with the nefarious aim of gaining political gains if the country reaches a state of unrest. Such evil minded people should be identified and strict action should be taken immediately under national security laws. The central government should immediately intervene in this matter and stop the attacks against Hindus in Bangladesh and ensure the safety of Hindus. The Hindu Front is going to hold a statewide demonstration on Monday 11 August 24 to condemn these inhuman acts of violence and demand justice for the Hindus in Bengal. I request all people to participate and support this demonstration.”

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

“Why Not Claim The Taj Mahal As Waqf Property?”, MP High Court Rips Into Waqf Board’s Claim On Burhanpur Monuments

By
The Commune
-
Madhya Pradesh High Court Rips Into MP Waqf Board’s Claim on Burhanpur Monuments Why Not Claim the Taj Mahal and All of India as Waqf Property

The Madhya Pradesh (MP) High Court overturned the State Waqf Board’s claim on historical monuments in Burhanpur, even as the judge commented ironically that if the Board had its way, it would claim the Taj Mahal and the rest of India as a Waqf property.

Waqf Board decision on Burhanpur monuments

The court overturned a decision by the MP Waqf Board on 7 August 2024, which classified the Tomb of Shah Shuja, the Tomb of Nadir Shah, Bibi Sahib’s Masjid, and the palace within the Fort of Burhanpur under the control and administration of the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) as Waqf property.

In 2013, the Waqf Board instructed the Archaeological Survey of India to vacate these sites, asserting ownership. The ASI, however, challenged this order through a writ petition, arguing that the sites—located in Emagird village, Burhanpur, and spanning about 4.448 hectares—were protected under the Ancient Monuments Preservation Act of 1904 and had been under their care for decades. The ASI contended that the designation as protected monuments could not be altered to waqf property without officially removing their protected status.

Conversely, the Waqf Board argued that its declaration of the property as waqf was valid and that the ASI should have appealed to the Waqf Tribunal rather than the high court.

The Trial

On 26 July 2024, Justice GS Ahluwalia’s bench noted that the properties had been officially designated as ancient monuments as early as 1913 and 1925 under the Ancient Monuments Preservation Act of 1904. There was no evidence indicating that this status had been revoked or altered according to Section 11 of the same Act.

The court highlighted that the Waqf Board’s claim was based on a notification under Section 5(2) of the Waqf Act, 1995. However, the Board failed to provide a complete notification to the court. Even though other parties did not contest this notification, the Board could not identify any legal basis for invalidating the earlier protections granted by the Ancient Monuments Preservation Act, 1904, without formal release by the Central Government or the Commissioner.

Referencing the Supreme Court’s ruling in Karnataka Board of Wakf vs. Government of India (2004), which affirmed that the Government of India maintains properties listed as Ancient Protected Monuments, the court agreed with the ASI’s position. It concluded that the Waqf Board’s notification was erroneous. Once a property is designated as an ancient monument and protected, it could not be retroactively classified as waqf property under the Waqf Act, 1995. Consequently, any such notification does not nullify the protections granted by the Ancient Monuments Preservation Act, 1904.

The High Court held that, “An erroneous notification issued in respect of property which is not an existing waqf property on the date of commencement of Waqf Act, wound not make it a waqf property thereby giving jurisdiction to the waqf Board to seek eviction of the Central Government from ancient and protected monuments.”

“Why not claim the Taj Mahal as Waqf property?”

The court determined that the CEO of the MP Waqf Board had acted improperly in declaring the monuments as waqf property and ordering the ASI’s eviction.

Justice GS Ahluwalia remarked, “Why not claim the Taj Mahal as Waqf property? Tomorrow, you might say that the entire India is Waqf property. It won’t work like this that you’ll issue notifications and the property will be yours.”  As a result, the court nullified the CEO’s order from 19 July 2013.

(With inputs from Law Beat)

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

The Kakori Conspiracy: A Forgotten Chapter In India’s Freedom Struggle?

By
Ratnakar Sadasyula
-

Nestled near Lucknow, Kakori is a small town known for its delicious kebabs, fragrant Dasheri mangoes, and intricate Zardosi embroidery. But beyond its cultural treasures and rich Sufi heritage, Kakori holds a profound place in India’s struggle for independence—a legacy often overshadowed in the annals of history. This quiet town became the stage for one of the most audacious acts of rebellion against British rule, led by the fiery revolutionary Ram Prasad Bismil. 

 

History of the Town

Kakori is also the seat of the Qadiriya Qalandari Sufi order and, since the 15th century, one of the main abodes of the Alavi and Abbasi branches of the Kakorvi Shaikh community. Like most of the towns in Avadh, it has large palatial homes of landed Muslim gentry. Many famous Muslim writers, such as Mohsin Kakorvi, his son Noorul Hasan Nayyier, who compiled Nurul Lughaat, a well-known Urdu dictionary, and satirist Ghulam Ahmed Alavi, hail from here.

Ram Prasad Bismil

The mastermind of Kakori was Ram Prasad Bismil, one of the greatest revolutionaries ever who had co-founded the Hindustan Republican Association along with Sachindranath Sanyal and Jadugopal Mukherjee.

Bismil already had a well-running business in Shahjahanpur which he had left to organize the revolutionary movement. However, the lack of funds was proving to be a main hindrance.

The 8 Down between Shahjahanpur and Lucknow used to pass through Kakori daily, and that was the genesis of the plot.  The intention was to stop the train at Kakori and loot the money bags, which would be used to fund the revolution.

Soon, a team was assembled, with his close friend Ashfaqullah Khan next in charge. Both hailed from Shahjahanpur, then a leading revolutionary hub. Ashfaq had long been an admirer of Bismil’s poetry.

Ashfaqullah initially opposed the plan, saying it was too risky and that the Government would crack down really hard. However, with others like Rajendra Lahiri and Thakur Roshan Singh supporting Bismil, he, too, lent his support.

The other team members included Chandrashekhar Azad, Sachindra Nath Bakshi, Keshab Chakravarty, Mukundi Lal, Banwari Lal Pandey, Kundan Lal, and Pranawesh Mukherjee. Above all, the team had Manmath Nath Gupta, whose book ‘They Lived Dangerously’ would give an excellent perspective of the revolutionary struggle for freedom.

9 August 1925

It was around evening time; the revolutionaries had already boarded the train. Rajendra Lahiri pulled the chain at Kakori station while Ashfaqullah held the driver hostage with his Mauser pistol.

Ram Prasad Bismil pushed the guard down and removed the government money from his cabin. However, when none could break the safe, it was Ashfaq once again who managed to break it with all his strength.

There was no bloodshed, except for one passenger killed accidentally. Soon, the Government cracked down on the Kakori rebels, and arrest warrants were issued.

While Azad managed to evade the crackdown, Ram Prasad was arrested soon enough at Saharanpur, while Ashfaqullah went into hiding for some time.  He would spend some time in Kanpur working at Ganesh Vidyarthi’s printing press. For quite some time, Ashfaqullah wandered all over the North from Kanpur to Bihar to Rajasthan, changing names. He finally went to Delhi and wanted to escape India somehow and meet Lala Hardayal. However, he was betrayed by his friend in Delhi to the police and arrested by Ikramul Haque.

The Trial

Around 40 more people from different cities were arrested. Prominent among them were Ashfaqullah, Bismil, Roshan Singh from Shahjahanpur, and Sachindranath Sanyal from Bengal. Of these, 15 were released due to lack of evidence, while Banwari Lal and Indu Bhushan Mitra turned approvers for a more lenient sentence. The trial began on 21 May 1926 against the remaining in the special sessions court of A. Hamilton. The revolutionaries were defended by Gobind Ballabh Pant, Mohan Lal Saxena, and Chandra Bhanu Gupta, among others. All the major leaders of the freedom movement, like Motilal Nehru, Madan Mohan Malviya, Lala Lajpat Rai, and Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi, came out in support.

Finally, the verdict was pronounced. Ram Prasad Bismil, Ashfaq Ullah Khan, Rajendra Lahiri, and Thakur Roshan Singh were sentenced to death. 

Sachindranath Sanyal and Sachindranath Bakshi were to be deported to Cellular Jail. Sanyal wrote ‘Bandi Jeevan—A Life of Captivity’, detailing his experiences there. Manmath Nath Gupta was sentenced to 14 years of imprisonment, while the rest received relatively lesser periods.

Protests and Political Impact

Widespread protests broke out against the verdict, and members of the central legislature petitioned the viceroy to commute the death sentence to life. However, by 22 August 1927, the main court endorsed the original judgement. Madan Mohan Malviya sent a clemency petition to Lord Irwin, with signatures from around 78 members, which was also rejected. S.L. Polak sent a final mercy appeal to the king on 16 September 1927, which, too, was rejected.

They were hanged one after another. Ashfaqullah was hanged at Faizabad and Ram Prasad Bismil at Gorakhpur on 19 December 1927. Thakur Roshan Singh was hanged at Naini near Allahabad on the same date. Rajendra Lahiri was hanged two days earlier at Gonda.

The voices fell silent, but the spirit would continue to inspire countless other revolutionaries. Kakori would be an important chapter in our freedom struggle, it’s another thing most of our political leaders don’t give much importance to this.

This is a list of the 40 odd arrested for Kakori. Some of their names are known, some are not.

 

Conclusion

Two significant events in our freedom struggle are Kakori and the Naval Ratings Mutiny. But our political elite class hardly commemorates them, unlike the Quit India Movement, which hardly achieved anything. The impact of the Kakori and Naval Ratings Mutiny was far more on the freedom struggle than the overhyped Quit India movement. However, our political leaders only remember the Quit India movement.

Schools and other institutions do nothing on the anniversary of Kakori or Naval Ratings Mutiny. Also, when it comes to Kakori, we must acknowledge the contribution of Shahjahanpur, as the majority of those involved came from this town – Bismil, Ashfaqullah, Thakur Roshan Singh, Banarsi Lal, Ram Ratan Shukla, Madan Lal.

It is truly a ‘Shaheedon Ki Nagari’.

(This article was originally published in History Under Your Feet Blog and has been republished with permission)

Ratnakar Sadasyalu is a blogger with a passion in movies, music, books, and history. A techie by profession and a writer at heart. Author of City of Victory a book on Vijayanagar Empire.

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Vinesh Phogat’s Disqualification At Paris Olympics – Is It Leftist-Alleged ‘Modi Conspiracy’ Or Fact-Based?

By
The Commune
-
Vinesh Phogat Disqualified At Paris Olympics

Indian wrestler Vinesh Phogat’s disqualification from the Paris Olympics for being overweight in her weight category has sparked a wave of misinformation and conspiracy theories from the anti-Modi camp. The group is attempting to blame Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the Wrestling Federation for Phogat’s disqualification, even though she was found 100 grams over the allowed weight limit for wrestlers in the 50 kg freestyle category during her gold medal bout weigh-in.

However, it’s essential to debunk the false narrative being peddled by left-leaning sympathisers. The disqualification was not a one-off incident. Several athletes have been disqualified from the Olympics for similar reasons. It’s crucial to focus on the facts rather than spreading misinformation and deflecting blame. Phogat’s disqualification resulted from her actions, not some grand conspiracy orchestrated by the government or the Wrestling Federation.

Vinesh’s Olympic Qualification Trials & Aftermath

Vinesh Phogat, competed in two Olympic weight categories qualification rounds, 50kg and 53kg, on the same day. Despite this unusual decision, she emerged victorious only in the lighter division, winning the selection trials for the Asian wrestling championships and Asian Olympic Games qualifier held at Patiala.

The ad-hoc committee and technical committee allowed her to compete in both weights, citing a lack of rule prohibiting wrestlers from competing in multiple weights during trials. However, this decision raised questions about the United World Wrestling’s Article-7, which states that each wrestler can only compete in one weight category at the official weigh-in. Vinesh fought her way to the top in the 50kg category, beating Nirmala Devi 10-0 in the semifinal and Shivanee Pawar 11-6 in the final. This gave her a chance to win a quota place in the lower weight category only.

In the 53kg category, Vinesh lost 10-0 to Anju in the semifinals but managed to secure a spot among the top-four contenders. This meant she was eligible to challenge Antim Panghal, the quota place winner in the 53kg category, for a spot in the Paris Olympic trials.

According to Bajrang Punia, Vinesh knew she was 2 kg overweight even before the competition, and her team had been working on reducing her weight since the night before. Despite trying every possible method, including severe dehydration, sweat sessions, and even cutting off her hair, Vinesh couldn’t shed more than 1.8 kg and was still 2.7 kg overweight.

Dr. Dinshaw Pardiwala, the Chief Medical Officer of the Indian Contingent, explained that Vinesh’s weight was monitored throughout the night, and despite efforts to reduce it, she was still over the allowed weight by 100 grams. He highlighted that Vinesh had tried every possible means to lose weight, but unfortunately, she didn’t have enough time.  Dinshaw Pardiwala said, “Her post-participation weight at the end of the semi-finals in the evening was found to be 2.7 kg more than the allowed weight. The team and the coach started off their usual process, which is of course limitation of water, no food. And you started with the whole process of sweating it out. Typically, you require some amount of time for that. But unfortunately, we didn’t have too much time. We had just 12 hours. So the whole night, the entire team, went ahead with this whole process of trying to reduce her weight, putting her in a steam and sauna, making her exercise and whatever was medically possible. We tried our best to try and get that weight down. When she couldn’t sweat anymore, we even had to go to some drastic measures like cutting off her hair…If we maybe had a few hours more we could have achieved those 100 grams, but we just didn’t have that time.”

This is not the first time Vinesh has been disqualified for being overweight. She was also disqualified in the 2016 Rio Olympics for being 400 grams overweight. This has raised concerns about the repeated instances of Vinesh being overweight and the consequences it has on her performance.

The situation has also sparked controversy, with some questioning whether Vinesh’s disqualification was a result of politics or not. Bajrang Punia and Vinesh Phogat herself acknowledged that she was overweight, and this has led to criticism about the lack of accountability and responsibility.

But Here’s What Leftists Peddled

One of them said, “Morning weight 49.1 Breakfast lunch served. In 12 hrs weight increased to 53kg. How it is possible. Shameless pawpaw Modi govt conspiracy.” 

Another user who seemed like a Dravidianist supporter shared a controversial cartoon, showing Prime Minister Narendra Modi allegedly backstabbing the wrestler Vinesh Phogat, with a sword, and captioned it “Royal Treason”. This image was made akin to the Bahubali backstabbed by Kattappa scene.

Another cartoon by controversial cartoonist Manjul depicts a weighing machine with Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s face beaming with a smile, while Vinesh Phogat stands on the scale, adding to the conspiracy theory that the PM was behind the wrestler’s disqualification.

Another cartoon, published in the Times of India, showed a caption that read, “If only you had agreed to sacrifice even 100 grams of your spine.” – suggesting that Vinesh Phogat should not be participating in the protest against the BJP leader.

Another user (from a now missing account) stated that, “Dinshaw Pardiwala is the nutritionist of Vinesh Phogat and he was the one responsible for her weight and nutrition. He works at the Kokilaben Ambani Hospital. The hospital is owned by “Ambani” No Conspiracy right?”

This also hints at a “conspiracy” since Nita Ambani is a member of the IOC.

Sweden-based alleged professor Ashok Swain, whose account is withheld in India claimed that Prime Minister Narendra Modi allegedly manipulated the weighing machine to ensure Vinesh Phogat’s disqualification. The user went on to insinuate that this was a deliberate conspiracy by Modi to prevent Phogat from winning the competition, drawing a parallel with the infamous story of Hitler’s alleged manipulation of events.

The Wire columnist, Ravi Nair, who also writes for The News Click and The Hindu, shared a cartoon on social media that depicted a person dressed like PM Modi with a lotus in hand, symbolizing the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), subtly manipulating the weighing machine to add extra weight to Vinesh Phogat’s scales. It is noteworthy that Ravi Nair had earlier made derogatory posts about PM Modi and also did many hit jobs against Adani group.

RJ Sayema who was nominated as “Equality Ambassador” by the US Embassy peddled lies that the WFI had conspired to prevent Vinesh Phogat from getting a medal. She wrote, “So, it IS the Wrestling Federation, after all! Sorry @Phogat_Vinesh, we truly don’t deserve you. “She wanted to compete in the still manageable 53kg category but a younger rival – Antim Panghal – had claimed that spot. Vinesh desperately asked for trials to determine who would represent India at the Olympics for that weight. *The federation didn’t budge. If she had to go to the Olympics, Vinesh had to wrestle at 50kg, or she wouldn’t get to wrestle at all.*”

IOC’s Weighing Rule

The International Olympic Committee (IOC) has a strict weighing rule in place to ensure the safety and well-being of athletes. Introduced in 2017, the rule aims to prevent wrestlers from drastically reducing their weight in a short span, which can have adverse health effects.

The rule states that wrestlers should compete in their natural weight category, rather than trying to shed excess pounds. This is because rapid weight loss can lead to health problems in the long run. The IOC’s president, Nenad Lalovic, emphasized that the rule is in place to protect athletes’ health, rather than revise it based on individual incidents.

According to Lalovic, “The wrestlers are losing too much weight and it’s not good for their health. Many have seen their interest at the moment but they don’t see what happens in 20-30 years. We want athletes to compete at their natural weight. That’s the idea. This is when they make the best performances.”

Did Vinesh Phogat Alone Face Disqualification At Paris Olympics 2024?

Contrary to the misinformation campaign peddled by Congressi simps, Vinesh Phogat is not the only athlete who has been disqualified due to weighing issues in the Olympics. In fact, Italy’s Emanuela Liuzzi faced a similar situation as Phogat, as she was also disqualified from competing in the women’s freestyle wrestling finals for exceeding the 50kg weight limit.

So far, at the Paris Olympics, three athletes were forced to withdraw from their competitions due to issues with their weight. Emanuela Liuzzi, an Italian wrestler, was disqualified from the women’s 50kg freestyle category after being found overweight. Liuzzi had secured a spot in the Olympics after her North Korean counterpart, Kim Sonhyang, withdrew from the event. In another instance, Messaoud Redouane Dris, an Algerian judoka, was disqualified from the Judo competition for being 400 grams overweight. She was set to compete against Israel’s Tohur Butbul. Meanwhile, American wrestler J’den Cox, who had won a bronze medal at the 2016 Rio Olympics, failed to make it to the 97kg category at the 2021 Tokyo Olympics due to being overweight. He was subsequently disqualified from competing.

In contrast to the intense media attention and political backlash in India, the other nations taking the news in stride, without making a big fuss about it. In fact, unlike the Indian politicians who have criticized the decision, and officials did not jump into the controversy, instead maintained a low profile.

Does The “Conspiracy Theory” Hold?

Former Indian Olympic medalists and Olympians have spoken out about Vinesh Phogat’s disqualification from the Paris Olympics. Yogeshwar Dutt emphasized that according to wrestling rules, athletes must meet their designated weight requirements, and even a small deviation of 10 grams can result in disqualification. He noted that international wrestlers are aware of the risks of being disqualified for exceeding their weight limits.

Viren Rasquinha, CEO of Olympic Gold Quest and former Olympian/captain of Indian Hockey team, issued a statement to clarify the events surrounding Vinesh’s disqualification. He explained that Vinesh had to make weight on two days of her 50kg women’s wrestling category at the Paris Olympics and had made weight as per rules within 50kg on the morning of 6 August 2024. However, she missed the weight by 100 grams on the second day.

Viren Rasquinha stated, “As per the rules of UWW, Vinesh Phogat had to make weight on 2 days of her 50 kgs women’s wrestling category at the Paris Olympics if she reached the final or was eligible for repechage. She made weight as per rules within 50 kgs on the morning of 6th August. Generally, post the morning weigh in, wrestlers have a recovery meal to regain strength and your weight immediately bounces back by 2-3 kgs depending on your regular weight. Vinesh’s regular weight is 55 kgs.”

“On 6th August evening after the semi-final, Vinesh weighed in at 52.7 kgs. Post the semi-final, she did not have any water or food and immediately started on the plan for losing weight for the next day’s weigh in which was scheduled from 7.15am to 7.30am Paris time. She and team did everything possible steam, sauna, static cycling, running, gym etc. unfortunately she missed the weight by 100 gms.” he further stated.

Latest Update

It is noteworthy that PM Modi asked IOC Chief PT Usha to explore all ways possible to ensure Vinesh gets justice. Phogat submitted a plea to the Court of Arbitration for Sports (CAS) challenging the decision to disqualify her from the competition. Phogat placed a plea for a silver medal. It has been reported that the CAS has accepted her plea, and it is likely that former Solicitor General of India, Harish Salve will represent Phogat at the hearing.

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

VCK Thirumavalavan Gives Award For “Religious Harmony” To Jamaat-e-Islami member

By
The Commune
-
VCK gave award to terror-sympathizing Jamaat-e-Islami member for "advocating peace."
VCK gave award to terror-sympathizing Jamaat-e-Islami member for "advocating peace."

Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi (VCK) leader and Chidambaram MP Thirumavalavan bestowed the “Quaid-E-Millath Pirai” award upon SN Sikander, the Secretary of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind in Tamil Nadu, for “advocating peace among different religious groups.”

Jamaat-E-Islami is an Islamist fundamentalist outfit that operates in India as Jamaat-e-Islami Hind. It is banned in Russia and Bangladesh. Thirumavalavan appears to overlook the disturbing actions and ideologies of this organisation, which is responsible for violence and terrorism in several countries. This notorious organisation is reportedly carrying out several atrocities on Hindu minorities, including brutal rape and abduction of Hindu women, in the ongoing turmoil in Bangladesh.

This award to a radical Islamist organisation raises concerns about Thirumavalavan’s stance on religious extremism.

Bangladesh Turmoil, Hindu Minority Persecuted by JeI

Since the forceful removal of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, there have been disturbing incidents of attacks on Hindus, their homes, and places of worship. These Islamic groups have unleashed destruction on the streets, instilling a climate of fear within minority communities, particularly Hindus.

Previous reports have revealed that Pakistan’s intelligence agency ISI, the Bangladesh Nationalist Party, and the Bangladeshi branch of JeI were the key orchestrators behind the campaign to oust Hasina. It is crucial to note that JeI is a banned extremist group that was held accountable for the massacre of Hindus and Bengali-speaking Muslims during the 1971 Bangladeshi independence war. The takeover of Bangladesh by these extremist Islamic groups, especially the JeI, has led to a concerning situation where minority communities, particularly Hindus, are facing targeted attacks, the destruction of their homes and places of worship, and an atmosphere of terror.

Against this background, social media highlighted the fear experienced by Hindu groups due to Islamic factions in neighbouring countries.

Quaid-E-Millath Pirai

The mention of Jamaat-e-Islami served as a trigger, reminding of an event where the Chidambaram MP gav the “Quaid-E-Millath Pirai” award upon JeI Secretary SN Sikander, for advocating peace among different religious groups.

Thirumavalavan praised SN Sikander for his various contributions and actions, stating, “He (Sikander) joined the Indian Islamic Students Organization and played a key role in disciplining the student community, guiding them on the path of morality. When he was the Tamil Nadu president of the organisation, he actively lobbied against the use of violent drugs. In 2004, Sikander helped to build permanent houses for the people affected by the tsunami in the Kotakuppam areas of Nagoor. Notably, he went against the majority opinion of “one country, one language, one culture” and created the television series “Manuda Vasantham,” which promoted the message of pluralism to the masses. Sikander was instrumental in the foundation and formation of the ‘Welfare Party.’ He acted as the secretary at the all-India level and continued to be a member of the General and Executive Committee.”

Thirumavalavan highlighted that Sikander worked efficiently as the president of the Welfare Party’s Tamil Nadu unit from 2011 to 2021. Additionally, Thirumavalavan noted that Sikander actively participated in the hydrocarbon protest in Thiruvarur, supported the farmers’ protest, and opposed the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), protesting against it.

Thirumavalavan finally said, “We are proud to present the 2024 Quaid-E-Millath Pirai Award to Sikander, who is the Tamil Nadu Secretary of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind and a member of the editorial board of the magazine “Samarasam”, a bi-monthly, for his contribution to religious harmony.”

Jamaat-e-Islami (JeI), a notorious Islamist organisation, has a long history of reigning terror in both India and other states. This extremist group has been responsible for a multitude of atrocities over the years.

Jamaat-e-Islami (JeI) – A Proxy For Pakistani Army In Bangladesh?

The Bangladeshi branch of Jamaat-e-Islami (JeI) was crucial in establishing auxiliary forces for the Pakistani army during the 1971 Bangladeshi independence war. These forces, including Razakar, Al-Badr, Al-Shams, and the Peace Committee, actively participated in atrocities against Bengali freedom fighters, particularly the Hindu population. JeI and its forces were responsible for the ruthless killing of hundreds of thousands of Hindu men, women, and children, as well as the rape of numerous Hindu women and girls.

The International Crimes Tribunals in Bangladesh have labelled JeI’s actions during the 1971 war as actively aiding the Pakistani occupation forces. JeI was founded by Muslim Brotherhood leader Sayyid Abul A’la Maududi with the aim of Islamic dominance and unifying the world under Islam’s banner.

In response to JeI’s terrorism and extremist Islamic factions, the Bangladeshi government has outlawed the group and its student wing, Chhatra Shibir, as terrorist organisations under the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2009. However, the student wing, allegedly supported by Pakistan’s intelligence agency ISI, has continued to incite violence under the guise of student protests, leading to violent acts against the democratically elected government of Sheikh Hasina.

JeI is not only active in Bangladesh but is believed to be connected to its parent organisation, Jamaat-e-Islami Pakistan, which is associated with other banned terror groups. The group operates in major countries worldwide, including India, Europe, the UK, and the USA, and has had a presence in Europe since the 1960s.

Jamaat-e-Islami Pakistan has been a prominent figure in electoral politics. It has a history of using violence, particularly through its militant student wing, Islami Janiat-e-Talaba, which gained control of several urban colleges and universities. The group maintains strong ties with various militant organisations, such as Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad, as well as the Muslim Brotherhood.

In addition to terrorist acts, JeI has been involved in financing and aiding other terrorist groups globally, as well as inciting the Muslim world to act against India over the Kashmir issue. The group has been collecting funds worldwide under the guise of charitable activities, such as a recent fundraising event in Brooklyn, New York, to aid flood victims in Pakistan, with the proceeds allegedly funneled to the Alkhidmat Foundation, the charity branch of Jamaat-e-Islami.

JeI Terror Activities In India

The social unrest and collapse of democracy in Bangladesh pose a threat of a humanitarian crisis along the Indian border. Additionally, the rise of extremism in the region, specifically with the banned JeI gaining influence, raises security concerns for India. It is noteworthy that JeI is proscribed not only in Bangladesh but also in India and Russia.

Following the Pulwama terror attack in India that resulted in the deaths of 40 CRPF members, the Indian government banned JeI in February 2019. During the crackdown, authorities detained 350 leaders of the extremist group, froze 70 bank accounts in Srinagar, seized assets worth ₹52 crore, and took legal action under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act. The actions also impacted 400 schools, 350 mosques, and 1000 seminaries associated with the separatist organisation in Jammu and Kashmir. Estimates in 2019 indicated that Jamaat-e-Islami possessed properties valued at ₹4,500 crores.

In February 2023, the Indian government extended the ban on JeI in Jammu and Kashmir for an additional five years, categorising it as an “unlawful association.” This decision came shortly after the National Investigation Agency (NIA) carried out searches related to a terrorism funding case involving the JeI branch in Kashmir. The operations led to the confiscation of over Rs 20 lakh, incriminating documents, and electronic devices linked to the group’s activities and associated trusts.

NIA investigation revealed that JeI members advocated for terrorism in J&K even after the organisation was banned in 2019. In December 2022, the J&K State Investigation Agency (SIA) took control of numerous properties belonging to the Jamaat in four districts of the Kashmir Valley, valued at Rs 100 crore.

The extremist organisation follows the doctrines of Hasan Al Banna, Syed Qutb, and Maulana Maududi, which advocate for political and societal alignment with Sharia law. The group has been suspected of covertly aiding the Hizbul Mujahideen, the leading local terrorist group in Kashmir, despite publicly distancing itself from the group in 1997.

Reports suggest that JeI is backing calls for secession from India and assisting terrorist and separatist organisations. Beyond terrorist acts, JeI Hind has been fostering and endeavouring to normalise radicalism and extremism in India. In October 2023, the group’s Jamaat-e-Islami Hind (JIH) branch organised an event to express ‘solidarity’ with the Hamas terrorists who perpetrated mass killings of civilians in Israel, further highlighting its extremist activities.

(With inputs from OpIndia)

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

Coup, Chaos, And Conspiracy: Bangladesh’s Descent Into Political Upheaval

By
The Commune
-
Coup, Chaos, And Conspiracy: Bangladesh's Descent Into Political Upheaval

As Sheikh Hasina fled to India on 5 August 2024 after the coup in Dhaka, it is anticipated that the former Bangladesh PM will extend her stay indefinitely due to a “technical roadblock” hindering her travel plans to the UK. This situation mirrors a past occurrence of her exile following the tragic assassination of her father and Bangladesh’s founder, Sheikh Mujibur Rehman, in 1975 during a similar coup. Hasina was in exile, along with her mother and almost all of her family members.

New Delhi is arranging to host Hasina for as long as necessary. Initially, she intended to journey to London to be with her niece Tulip Siddiq, who currently serves as a member of the British Parliament, holding the positions of economic secretary to the Treasury and Labour MP for Hampstead and Highgate. However, the obstacle lies within the UK’s Immigration regulations, which lack provisions for individuals to apply for asylum or seek temporary refuge outside the UK.

Reports indicate that Hasina is exploring alternatives with different nations, such as the UAE and Saudi Arabia, in addition to the countries where her close relatives currently live, such as the United States, the United Kingdom, Finland, and India.

The Fall Of Dhaka

The fall of Dhaka after the coup is alleged to have resulted from aggressive information and psychological warfare tactics employed by external forces, as a lack of adequate resources hindered any effective response. The impact was not confined to the coup or the realm of politics. Instead, it undermined the fundamental principles of liberty that previous generations in Bangladesh struggled to uphold in the face of atrocities, such as genocide and sexual violence.

Bangladesh gained independence from Pakistani rule five decades ago. The United States deployed its 7th Fleet in the Bay of Bengal to impede Bangladesh’s liberation. The liberty earned through Mujibur Rehman’s sacrifice, and the influence of Rabindranath Tagore’s principles has been snatched away. The United States, Pakistan, and China hijacked the movement initiated by Bangladeshis protesting against fair quotas.

USA’s Influence Through Indo-Pacific Strategy

At a briefing titled “Indo-Pacific Strategy for Bangladesh” held on 24 April 2024, Maxwell Martin, the political officer from the State Department at the US Embassy, emphasised that the US views Bangladesh independently of its relationship with India. Martin reiterated the US’s commitment to supporting the Bangladeshi armed forces in achieving their “Forces Goal 2030” to enhance regional security.

With expertise in analysing the dynamics of revolutions involving Jihad, Martin’s in-depth knowledge ranges from Arabic language proficiency to the Arab Spring, establishing rebel governments in Syria, and understanding the connections between Al-Qaeda in the Indian Subcontinent (AQIS) and Jamaat-e-Islami and its militant factions. This background equips him to gauge the sentiments in Dhaka during times of protest, prompting questions on the relevance of such specialised insight in the context of Dhaka.

Influence Of Chinese & Communists

During the ongoing protests in Bangladesh, the Chinese embassy is reported to have sent gifts to BNP Chairperson Khaleda Zia through SF International Courier. Khaleda Zia had previously received gifts from the Chinese embassy in 2020.

Amid the heated protests in Dhaka, Chinese officials were allegedly seen moving freely, and Pakistani embassy officials accompanied them. Members of Jamaat-e-Islami (JeI), who had reportedly infiltrated the student protests, even recognised Chinese embassy officials as allies.

Another buzz in Dhaka politics revolves around Rashid Khan Menon, the Chairman of the Workers Party of Bangladesh. Between 13 to 18 May 2024, Rashid Khan Menon, Dilip Barua, General Secretary of the Communist Party (ML), and Shirin Akhter, General Secretary of the National Socialist Party, visited Yunnan, China.

Chinese Ambassador to Bangladesh, Yao Wen, is said to have played an active role in organising mass rallies against the Hasina government upon the return of the communist trio from Yunnan. Subsequently, ISI allegedly embedded Jamaat elements into the protests to try and influence the situation.

Pakistan’s Aspiration To Re-Create East Pakistan

Pakistan’s ongoing ambition to re-establish East Pakistan has been evident since its defeat in 1971, with the shadow of the 93000-figure looming over the Pakistani Army for the past 52 years. Recent events have seen former ISI Chief Lt. Gen. Naveed Mukhtar linked to an allegedly failed assassination plot targeting Sheikh Hasina. Rallies supporting the ‘Razakar’ were said to be orchestrated in collaboration with Left-wing parties. Presently, Pakistan is reported to be lobbying for the lifting of the ban on JeI through their association with BNP as a recognition of their efforts.

The Islamic Chhatra Shibir (ICS)

The crucial question now is whether Bangladeshis will allow the “Islamic Chhatra Shibir (ICS) terrorists” to seize power. ICS is said to have garnered a notorious reputation for criminal activities across Bangladesh. Operating under the guise of a student organisation, the group’s members are said to have been involved in numerous cases of murder and rape. Note: Chhatra Shibir refers to Student camp.

One example of such a situation occurred in 2020 when a married woman was subjected to gang rape in Sylhet. The woman and her husband were at MC College one Friday evening when they were forcibly taken to the college hostel by a group of individuals who sexually assaulted the woman while detaining her husband.

In a separate case, a Shibir leader named Hamidur Rahman Azad (26) was apprehended in August 2021 for attempting to rape a schoolgirl in Sonagazi. Similarly, in March of the same year, Shafiqul Islam, a local ICS leader, raped a young girl when she approached him for onions.

The incidents do not end there; ICS is also said to be involved in trafficking underage Bangladeshi girls to Chinese buyers. Recently, on 8 June 2024, a Chinese national named ‘Jisao Suhui’ was arrested by Bangladeshi police in Uttara for allegedly collaborating with Chhatra Shibir members in human trafficking from the Chittagong hill tracts to China. ICS members are said to entice teenage girls with lucrative job offers through social media, only to exploit and sell them to Chinese buyers after subjecting them to days of sexual abuse.

Aside from engaging in acts of rape and murder, ICS members are also said to be implicated in terrorist activities. In May 2022, the Secretary of Bangladesh Islami Chhatra Shibir Rajshahi Metropolis, Dr. Osama Ryan, and six associates were detained on terrorism charges. The ISIS terrorists responsible for the Holy Artisan Bakery attack in July 2016, which resulted in the deaths of 23 individuals, were supported by the Islamic Chhatra Shibir network, with many ICS members affiliated with groups like Jamaat Ul Mujahideen, AQIS, and ISIS.

According to the data from 2022, foreign direct investment in Bangladesh increased to $3.44 billion, a 37% growth. Up until August 4, the country was recognised as one of the rapidly developing commercial centres in Asia. With a consistent annual increase in foreign direct investment flows, the ongoing job crisis might have been resolved within seven years.

Extremist groups initiated destructive actions by setting ablaze luxury hotels and destroying public infrastructures, roads, and even the national parliament and Sheikh Hasina’s residence after the coup. The protest, supposedly aimed at protecting meritocracy, is overshadowed by the extremist ideology of Jamaat-e-Islami and ICS, orchestrated successfully by Pakistan.

The influx of foreign direct investment is anticipated to halt, leaving no funds available to enhance quality of life. The students and young people of Bangladesh, who previously rallied for their rightful demands, are now confronted with the necessity to confront their extremist forces or adapt to surviving in a failed state.

In the past, similar distressing situations have been observed in conflicts like the Iraq War, Libya, and Afghanistan. Presently, in Bangladesh, democracy and minority lives are under threat following a coup orchestrated by terrorists who have infiltrated under the guise of protestors. This trend of using student protests as a cover for a coup and persecution of Hindu minorities is alarming and threatens the stability of the region.

(This article is Based on an X thread by Nepal Correspondence)

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

1...852853854...1,871Page 853 of 1,871
TheCommune
The Commune is a news and views portal focusing on social and political issues of the southern part of India with a focus on Tamil Nadu.
Contact us: thecommune.news@gmail.com
Facebook Instagram X Youtube

NATIONAL NEWS

Abhijeet Dipke, AAP’s Former Operative Who Made Seditious Posts About Kashmir, Is Now Trying To Trigger Gen Z Unrest Through ‘Cockroach Janta Party’

Abhijeet Dipke, AAP’s Former Operative Who Made Seditious Posts About Kashmir,...

The Commune - 0
A new online political outfit calling itself the “Cockroach Janta Party” (CJP) has rapidly gone viral across social media platforms after emerging in the...
© The Commune 2025. All Rights Reserved.