In a landmark ruling on 9 December 2024, the Telangana High Court stripped former BRS MLA Chennamaneni Ramesh of his Indian citizenship, declaring him a German citizen. The court also imposed a fine of Rs 30 lakh for concealing his German citizenship and misleading the judiciary. This decision marks the first instance of a former legislator losing their Indian citizenship.
Justice B Vijaysen Reddy, in his judgment, stated that Ramesh’s actions since 2009 had deprived genuine Indian citizens of their right to contest elections. The court upheld the Union Ministry of Home Affairs’ decision to revoke Ramesh’s Indian citizenship, citing his status as a German national. The ruling also highlighted that Ramesh had failed to provide any documentation from the German embassy confirming he was no longer a citizen of Germany.
The case stems from a petition filed by Congress functionary Aadi Srinivas, who argued that Ramesh had naturalized as a German citizen in the 1990s after settling in Germany. In Germany, Ramesh worked, married, and raised a family. Despite acquiring Indian citizenship in 2008, Ramesh had retained his German passport and citizenship, which led to questions about the validity of his electoral candidacy.
Ramesh, who represented the Vemulawada constituency for four terms between 2009 and 2018, won elections while concealing his dual nationality. In his final electoral attempt, Ramesh contested in the November 2023 election with forged documents, presenting himself as an Indian national, despite holding German citizenship. The court found that his concealment of facts had misled both the Indian government and the electorate.
The Telangana High Court had earlier been informed by the central government that Ramesh held a German passport valid until 2023. The Union Ministry of Home Affairs had issued an order in 2020 revoking his Indian citizenship, citing Ramesh’s failure to disclose his German citizenship during the application process. The Ministry further stated that had Ramesh revealed he had not resided in India for the required period before applying for Indian citizenship, the government would not have granted his request.
In response, Ramesh filed a petition challenging the Home Ministry’s order. He was asked by the court to submit an affidavit detailing his German passport’s surrender and proof that he had renounced his German citizenship. In 2013, the undivided Andhra Pradesh High Court had quashed Ramesh’s bypoll victory on similar grounds, though he later secured a stay from the Supreme Court.
The Telangana High Court’s decision is a significant moment in Indian electoral law, as it reaffirms the requirement that only Indian citizens are eligible to contest elections or vote.
Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.
The Dravidian model of governance, championed by the DMK as a boon for the people, has left over 30,000 sanitation workers in rural Tamil Nadu unpaid for over six months. These workers, responsible for cleaning toilets in government schools, are enduring significant hardship as funds from the Rural Development Department have been withheld. With no salaries forthcoming, many school headmasters and teachers are personally funding the sanitation workers while activists demand better wages and urgent intervention by the DMK government.
Some school headmasters and teachers have been personally funding these workers without salaries. For instance, K. Solachi, a 55-year-old worker from Thiyagarajapuram in Kallakurichi district, shared that she has been employed at a village middle school for over a decade. Last academic year, she received her salary for only six out of 12 months, leaving her unpaid for ₹9,000. This year, her dues have accumulated to ₹18,000. Struggling to afford basic needs like food and medical care, Solachi relies on the school’s noon meal for sustenance.
This dire situation affects thousands of workers like Solachi across the state. Activist K. Thirupathi from Kallakurichi highlighted that repeated appeals to the authorities have gone unheeded. He called for an increase in their wages from the current ₹1,000 for primary school workers to at least ₹5,000, citing the inadequacy of their current earnings to sustain a dignified life.
A headmaster from a panchayat union middle school in Coimbatore’s Thondamuthur block revealed that panchayat funds for salaries have been withheld for over 18 months. To support a worker, he has been paying ₹3,000 monthly. Many schools are in similar situations, with teachers or administrators stepping in to cover cleaning costs.
R. Kanagaraj from the Tamil Nadu Primary School Teacher Federation reported that no budget has been allocated for salaries or toilet maintenance this academic year. Even the meagre ₹300 allocated previously for cleaning supplies is unavailable, forcing teachers to shoulder the costs.
A block development officer in Coimbatore confirmed that funding from the Rural Development Department has been halted since March. He noted that providing salaries and maintenance for 671 government schools in the district would require approximately ₹80 lakh annually, a sum currently unavailable due to a shortage of panchayat funds.
Responding to inquiries, P. Ponniah, Director of Rural Development and Panchayat Raj, assured that steps are being taken to release the funds soon.
Even in the past, the Dravidian model DMK government, on 21 October 2024, announced a bonus of up to ₹16,800 for TASMAC employees in the state while ignoring the struggles of cleanliness workers employed on contract through private organizations. This neglect initially emerged in Coimbatore and later spread to the Thoothukudi district, where workers gathered in protest outside the Collectorate building to demand their rightful wages.
A 34-year-old man, Atul Subhash, a top AI expert at a private firm in Bengaluru, tragically died by suicide at his residence in the Manjunath Layout area on 9 December 2024, leaving behind a detailed death note accusing his wife and her family of harassment.
Subhash had been living alone following his separation from his wife. He reportedly left behind a detailed 24-page death note in which he accused his wife and her family of harassment, which he claimed contributed to his emotional distress.
According to police, Subhash had been entangled in a bitter marital dispute, with his wife recently filing a domestic violence case against him in Uttar Pradesh. The police suggest this may have intensified Subhash’s mental anguish. In his death note, Subhash detailed ongoing issues in his marriage and blamed his wife—who works at Accenture—and her relatives, including her mother, brother, and uncle. He accused them of mistreating him and using their son as leverage to extort money in the form of maintenance. In the note, he wrote, “Our emotions and love for children can’t get defiled like this and they can’t become a tool of money transfer (or so-called social justice) scheme from a man to a woman.”
Before taking the extreme step, Subhash reportedly emailed his death note to several people and shared it with a WhatsApp group of an NGO he was involved with. In the moments leading up to his suicide, Subhash also recorded a video, which has since gone viral on social media. He had meticulously prepared for his final act, placing important details such as his death note’s location, vehicle keys, and a list of completed and pending tasks on a cupboard. He also hung a placard in his home that read, “Justice is due,” underscoring his belief that his narrative needed to be understood.
"Justice is Due.”
These words were scrawled across an A4 sheet glued to Atul Subhash’s chest, a top AI expert in Bengaluru, when his lifeless body was found. The scene unraveled a grim story—a man cornered by the weight of relentless harassment, both personal and legal. (1/15)
The police have registered a case of unnatural death and initiated an investigation into the circumstances surrounding his death. A complaint filed by Subhash’s brother has led to charges of abetment being filed against his wife and her family. The brother alleged that Subhash’s wife and her relatives fabricated false cases against him and demanded a settlement of Rs 3 crore in exchange for dropping the charges.
This heartbreaking incident has cast a spotlight on the devastating emotional toll of unresolved marital disputes, especially when complicated by legal battles. Authorities have expressed concern over the impact of such ongoing conflicts and are urging individuals who may be struggling emotionally to seek support.
Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.
Zee Tamil has come under fire for a controversial enactment in one of its programmes that allegedly mocked the sacred rituals of Tulunad’s Daivaradhane, a traditional form of spirit worship practised by the Tulu community. The portrayal was criticized as a blatant disrespect to the ancient and deeply revered cultural practices of the Tulu people.
The outrage began after clips of the performance surfaced online, prompting an immediate backlash from the Hindu community. They accused Zee Tamil of reducing their sacred Daivaradhane rituals to a theatrical act, terming it a mockery of their belief system. Devotees felt that stage enactments of such sacred rituals should not be allowed, as they trivialize and disrespect ancient practices.
Following the widespread criticism, Zee Tamil took down the controversial video from its Instagram account. However, the channel has yet to issue an official apology or explanation for the enactment. Observers noted that while the video was removed, there has been no clarity on whether the programme will still be aired on television.
The deletion of the video was seen as a partial victory for the community’s campaign to protect and preserve their rituals.
The Tulu community has vowed to continue their efforts to raise awareness about Daivaradhane and to prevent its misuse in popular media. The lack of an apology from Zee Tamil has left the community dissatisfied. Many have questioned whether the channel would have allowed such a portrayal of other cultural rituals, urging greater sensitivity and accountability from media outlets.
Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.
Somanahalli Mallaiah Krishna, a towering figure in Indian politics and former Chief Minister of Karnataka, passed away at 92, leaving behind an indelible legacy that spanned decades of service to Karnataka and the nation. From his early days as a scholar in the United States to his transformative role in Karnataka’s development, SM Krishna had a journey that exemplified dedication, intellect, and statesmanship.
After earning a Master’s in Law as a Fulbright Scholar from Southern Methodist University in Texas, USA, the 27-year-old SM Krishna moved to Washington, DC, in 1957-58 to pursue a career. During this period, he stumbled upon an advertisement in The New York Times for a position at the Association of American Manufacturers. The job of “messenger,” as Krishna later learned, involved lobbying members of Congress about manufacturing policies.
Krishna excelled with his natural charm and keen intellect, forging connections with influential American leaders, including John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon. His admiration for Kennedy led him to campaign for the future President, earning him a personal thank-you letter, which remained one of Krishna’s cherished possessions. Despite wanting to stay in the US and build a political career, Krishna returned to India following his father’s death, taking up family responsibilities.
Krishna’s political career began with a surprise victory as an independent candidate in the 1962 Karnataka Assembly elections. He later joined the Congress party under Indira Gandhi’s leadership and became integral to her circle. In the 1970s, he was pivotal as Minister for Industries and Commerce in D. Devaraj Urs’s government, helping establish Peenya as Asia’s largest industrial area.
Transforming Karnataka’s Landscape
Krishna’s tenure as Chief Minister from 1999 to 2004 is a golden period for Karnataka. His vision turned Bengaluru into India’s Silicon Valley, attracting IT giants and fostering an era of technological innovation. He spearheaded landmark projects, including the Outer Ring Road, which revolutionized the city’s connectivity, and the development of Kempegowda International Airport.
His government also emphasized urban beautification, including the revival of Bengaluru’s famed Lalbagh botanical garden, ensuring it remained a green oasis amid rapid urbanization. Krishna’s emphasis on infrastructure extended to initiatives like the Bengaluru Metro and the Yashaswini health insurance scheme for farmers, which set a precedent for state-led welfare programs.
Krishna faced significant challenges during his tenure, including prolonged droughts, the Cauvery water-sharing dispute, and the abduction of Kannada icon Rajkumar by forest brigand Veerappan. Despite these hurdles, he maintained a calm demeanour and showed remarkable resilience.
After stepping down as Chief Minister, Krishna served as the Governor of Maharashtra and later as India’s Minister of External Affairs during UPA-II, leaving his mark on India’s foreign policy.
Personal and political setbacks marked Krishna’s later years. He was disappointed when the Congress leadership overlooked him for key positions, leading him to join the BJP in 2017. However, he remained a misfit in the party and largely avoided active politics.
The tragic loss of his son-in-law, VG Siddhartha, the founder of Café Coffee Day, in 2019 deeply affected Krishna and his family. Despite these struggles, Krishna remained a passionate reader, music lover, and tennis enthusiast until his final days.
As a statesman who balanced urban progress with rural welfare, industrial growth with environmental conservation, and local governance with a global vision, SM Krishna leaves a legacy. His contributions to Karnataka’s IT revolution, infrastructure development, and social welfare continue to shape the state’s identity.
He is survived by his wife of 60 years, Prema, and their two daughters, Malavika and Shambhavi. Karnataka mourns the loss of one of its most distinguished sons, whose life was a testament to vision, dedication, and resilience.
In Taludali village near Tindivanam in the Viluppuram district, nearly 490 rotten eggs intended for distribution to students in government schools under midday meal scheme were buried after an inspection by the Block Development Officer (BDO).
The issue of spoiled eggs being prepared for school students came to light when parents discovered that rotten, foul-smelling eggs were being used in the school meals. Concerned for their children’s health, the parents confronted the cooking staff at the government higher secondary and primary schools in Taludali village, leading to a heated argument.
Upon learning about the incident, Block Development Officer (BDO) Silambu Selvan intervened and visited the schools to inspect the situation. During his inspection, he confirmed that a large portion of the eggs stored in the kitchen was unfit for consumption. Addressing the parents’ concerns, the BDO assured them that immediate action would be taken to resolve the issue. He further pledged that such lapses would not occur in the future, leading to a compromise.
To ensure the safety of the students, Silambu Selvan ordered the immediate disposal of the spoiled eggs. Using a JCB, the eggs were buried in a pit within the school premises. Additionally, the 490 eggs designated for distribution were returned to the BDO office for further action. This incident has sparked widespread concern, emphasizing the urgent need for stricter oversight and quality control in midday meal programs to ensure the health and safety of students.
Authorities are hunting for suspects who stole a 1.5-foot-tall bronze Vinayagar statue from a Pulavanur temple near Panruti. The theft occurred at a temple located on Pulavanur’s main road. On 8 December 2024, the temple was secured and locked by its caretaker, Nandagopal, after the evening puja concluded at 6:30 PM.
To the shock of devotees, when the temple was reopened for morning puja at 6:30 AM on 9 December, the lock on the temple’s front door was broken. Upon further inspection, it was discovered that the bronze Vinayagar statue had been stolen from the Panruti temple.
Sridevi, a Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments (HRCE) Department inspector, filed a complaint at the Panruti police station. The police have since registered a case and launched an investigation to locate the missing statue and apprehend those responsible.
The audacious theft has deeply disturbed devotees, who are urging the authorities to identify the culprits and recover the stolen idol swiftly.
Prahlad Iyengar, a highly regarded PhD student at MIT, has found his promising academic career derailed after being suspended for an article he wrote in a student magazine, Written Revolution. Iyengar, a Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science student, faces a suspension that will last until January 2026, effectively terminating his five-year NSF fellowship. The article, titled “On Pacifism,” critiques the emphasis on nonviolent resistance in movements like the Palestinian struggle, asserting that violent tactics may be necessary in the fight against colonial oppression.
Here's Prahlad Iyengar "On Pacifism" in student-run magazine Written Revolution. This article caused this issue #5 of the magazine to be banned by @MIT. Warning: This article might make you feel "unsafe" or you might decide that author is a "terrorist" https://t.co/REBYMNWvTb
Prahlad Iyengar, in the article “On Pacifism”, critiques the over-reliance on nonviolence in resistance movements, particularly in the Palestinian struggle against genocide. He draws on historical examples, including Gandhi’s nonviolent movement and the self-immolation of Thích Quang Ðuc and Aaron Bushnell, to argue that while pacifism has value, it should not be the sole strategy in liberation struggles.
Iyengar contends that the Palestinian movement’s current tactics, such as protests and boycotts, are insufficient to end the genocide or dismantle the apartheid regime. He criticizes pacifist actions prioritising personal safety over meaningful sacrifice, arguing that many protests are carefully structured to avoid real consequences, thus failing to challenge oppressive systems. Referencing Ward Churchill’s analysis, he claims that such protests are symbolic and often co-opted by the state, reinforcing rather than dismantling the status quo. Iyengar calls for a diversified resistance approach, where pacifism is a tactical choice rather than a strategic goal. He advocates for building root-mycelial mutual aid networks and engaging in direct community-centered actions that challenge deeper structural issues like gentrification and systemic oppression.
While Iyengar does not explicitly call for widespread violence, he does argue that violent resistance should be a part of the broader strategy against oppression. He believes that the Palestinian struggle, in particular, requires more than pacifist tactics, and that acts of resistance, including property damage or even armed struggle, can be necessary to challenge colonial oppression. By acknowledging the role of sacrifice and the need for diverse forms of resistance, Iyengar suggests that strategic violence can complement nonviolence in efforts to dismantle oppressive systems.
This argument, combined with imagery from groups such as the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), which the U.S. has labeled a terrorist organization, led MIT’s administration to accuse him of promoting violence.
MIT officials, citing concerns from some faculty and students, assert that the article could incite violent protests on campus.
In a letter sent to the magazine’s editors, Dean of Student Life David Warren Randall referred to the article’s content as potentially “violent or destructive,” particularly due to the inclusion of the PFLP logo. The decision has sparked significant backlash, with many, including the MIT Coalition Against Apartheid, accusing the university of stifling free speech and political expression.
Suspended @MIT student Prahlad Iyengar calls for intifada on campus in virulent jihad manifesto. Claims his speech rights are being violated. Read it for yourself and decide whether it crosses the line inciting violence. Radical faculty rally in support.https://t.co/iWIp0hGJlypic.twitter.com/pUcwERV9rW
Iyengar, however, maintained that the suspension is part of a broader attack on his right to express views on Palestinian liberation. In his statement, Iyengar defended his article as part of legitimate academic discourse on non-violence, citing historical movements and international law. He condemned MIT’s actions as an unprecedented attack on free speech, arguing that banning the zine sets a dangerous precedent for censorship.
Iyengar questioned whether this would lead to further restrictions on academic material and the expression of dissent, drawing parallels to other cases of suppression of anti-genocide protests in universities. The PhD scholar called MIT students, staff, and faculty to stand against censorship and allow him to return to campus to continue his research. He stressed that the issue concerns protecting democratic principles and the right to criticize oppressive regimes.
He said, “The article wrote was about adopting a pacifist stance and was critical of that stance. I, of course, relied on materials related to resistance against occupation, both passive resistance and non-passive resistance. But what happened is that Zionist students on the campus including some faculty members at the university claimed and alleged that I might be a terrorist and that I incite violence at the university. Based on these allegations, MIT decided to take action against me. I would connect what happens on a small scale at MIT with what happens on a larger scale in Palestine where the term ‘terrorism’ is used to harm people. A few weeks ago, the official IDF Twitter account published photos of 6 journalists in Gaza.”
The freak of nature in the kitchen towel and the bull ring is Prahlad Iyengar, a 2nd year PhD student at MIT. Yesterday, the institution suspended him after first having moved to expel him on charges.
The MIT Coalition Against Apartheid has rallied in support of Iyengar, calling his suspension a gross violation of free speech and academic freedom. The group has launched a campaign to reverse the decision, calling for MIT to cease criminalizing students for standing up for Palestinian rights. According to the coalition, Iyengar’s suspension amounts to an effective expulsion, as it would significantly disrupt his academic career, and his readmission will be subject to the same panel that suspended him.
Woke Propaganda Found Another Victim – Prahlad Iyengar
Ultimately, Prahlad Iyengar’s journey from a promising student to a controversial figure highlights the dangers of blindly subscribing to woke ideologies. While he may have believed he was fighting for the oppressed, in reality, he’s become an instrument of a larger, dangerous agenda. His suspension at MIT, fueled by his support for causes that align with extremist ideologies, serves as a stark reminder: woke movements, often cloaked in the language of justice, can easily lead to manipulation and co-optation by forces with no regard for true human rights or freedom.
Instead of using his academic prowess to challenge real societal issues, Iyengar has become a pawn in a divisive and radical narrative that could ultimately discard him when he no longer serves its purpose. His embrace of these ideologies has not only disrupted his academic career but may also have led him down a path where, ironically, the very forces he champions could one day turn on him. It’s a harsh truth: the woke agenda that promises solidarity often offers little but betrayal, leaving those who fall into its grip to face the consequences when their usefulness has passed.
Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.
Shocking CCTV footage has emerged showing a gang of youths on two-wheelers casually fleeing the scene after attacking two young men with sickles and other sharp objects near Iyyappanthangal, Chennai. As they made their escape, the assailants caused further chaos by scratching parked cars and creating panic within the community.
The incident occurred on December 9, 2024, when a gang of 10 people riding on five motorcycles arrived at the scene armed with sickles and attacked two youths, identified as Tamil and Suriya, who were standing on the roadside. It is alleged that the attackers pursued the victims down the road before launching the brutal assault.
The victims were rushed to a private hospital and are currently receiving treatment for their injuries. The police have launched an investigation and identified one of the suspects as Sabari, who, along with his gang, is currently on the run. Authorities suspect that the attack may be linked to gang rivalry.
This violent incident has left the local community in shock and fear, with residents expressing concern over their safety in the wake of the attack.
This is not an isolated incident. The rise of rowdyism, attacks, lootings, and gang rivalries has been steadily increasing across the state. The lack of stringent action or proper follow-up on such cases, along with overlooked arrests, has contributed to the state’s growing law and order issues.
Robbery Spree At Night In Chennai
A shocking robbery spree unfolded on 2 December 2024 in Chennai when a gang of four attacked Akash, a 25-year-old IT employee from Sholinganallur, and his friend Janakar, 28, as they returned home after dining. The gang, travelling in an autorickshaw, surrounded the duo, brutally assaulting Akash with knives and sticks, inflicting severe injuries on his head, ear, and knee. They robbed him of his OnePlus phone and ₹2,000 before fleeing.
The spree continued as the gang intercepted an online food delivery worker, robbing him at knifepoint. They went on to target multiple victims across various locations, including Kelambakkam, where they snatched another phone. Despite their attempts to evade capture, the Chemmancherry Police, led by Inspector Gladson Jose, tracked the gang through the night and apprehended them in Mangadu after a confrontation.
The suspects—Sharif (24), Abbas Sharif (22), Abdul Razak, and a juvenile—were found to be deeply involved in criminal activities. Police revealed that Sharif, posing as a food delivery worker, was a ganja seller who led the gang in a series of robberies to fund their extravagant lifestyle. Earlier crimes included robbing a pedestrian in Pallavaram and an auto driver outside a medical shop. The gang’s actions reflected a descent into lawlessness fueled by substance abuse and financial desperation.
Woman Brutally Attacked With Sickle In Public
In November 2024, disturbing CCTV footage surfaced, capturing a violent attack on a young man and woman riding a two-wheeler in Chennai. The footage quickly went viral online and revealed a chilling incident on Ayanavaram KS Road, causing widespread concern and outrage. The young duo had reportedly purchased a parcel from a nearby hotel and were riding along the road when an unidentified assailant suddenly appeared. The attacker blocked their path and began assaulting the young man with a machete. When the woman attempted to intervene, she too was attacked, sustaining a deep cut on her hand.
Fearing for his life, the man fled the scene, leaving the woman injured. The incident was captured on CCTV cameras installed at nearby shops, providing crucial evidence. The Ayanavaram police have registered a case and initiated an investigation to identify and apprehend the attacker. The brazen nature of this daylight assault has sparked concern among residents about public safety and the rising tide of violence in the city.
Subscribe to our Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram channels and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.
In its recent coverage of the leadership change at the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), Financial Timesframed Shaktikanta Das’s departure as though he was “fired” due to slowing economic growth and rising inflation. However, this narrative misrepresents the facts: Das was not dismissed but completed his two terms, the maximum tenure allowed for any RBI governor. This attempt to sensationalize the story undermines the significant contributions made by Das during his six-year tenure.
A Tenure Of Crisis Management And Stability
Das, who took charge in 2018 amidst strained relations between the RBI and the government, successfully steered the institution through numerous challenges. From resolving the IL&FS crisis to stabilizing banks like Yes Bank and Lakshmi Vilas Bank, he tackled critical financial threats without causing systemic instability.
His tenure was further marked by adept handling of the COVID-19 economic crisis. Das implemented targeted liquidity measures, ensuring the smooth functioning of banks and markets during unprecedented lockdowns. These efforts helped India achieve three consecutive years of over 7% GDP growth—a remarkable feat considering the global economic disruption caused by the pandemic.
Das’s approach to inflation was far from “hawkish” as described by FT. While CPI inflation occasionally breached the 6% upper limit, he managed to navigate these pressures deftly, using verbal interventions and strategic policy adjustments. During the pandemic, when inflation data collection was compromised, Das skillfully questioned its reliability, ensuring that the RBI had room to maneuver without breaching its inflation-targeting mandate.
Das used periods of economic stability to fortify India’s banking system. He introduced reforms to enhance risk capital for unsecured loans, pushed for better provisioning for infrastructure projects, and strengthened financial accounting standards. Beyond these, Das was a pioneer in digital banking, overseeing the launch of India’s central bank digital currency and expanding the role of UPI in digital lending.
Far from being a dismissed governor, Das leaves the RBI with accolades from global financial communities. He was named the “Best Central Banker” for two consecutive years, recognising his balanced approach to monetary policy and his ability to innovate in financial regulation.
The Financial Times report neglects the critical detail that Shaktikanta Das served two full terms—the maximum any RBI governor can serve and has served. This cap is not unique to Das; it applies to all governors as per institutional norms. His six-year tenure is the second-longest in RBI history, underscoring the government’s trust in him to lead during turbulent times.
FT undermines Das’s significant achievements by implying he was removed due to policy disagreements or economic challenges. The truth is that Das leaves behind an RBI that is stronger in resilience, innovation, and global reputation. His departure is not a dismissal but a culmination of a successful tenure that respected institutional norms.
The role of an RBI governor demands much more than interest rate adjustments. It requires a vision for stability, growth, and modernization—traits Das exemplified throughout his tenure.
