Home News JCD Prabhakar Quoting Bible Or Attending Religious Events Were Never A Problem...

JCD Prabhakar Quoting Bible Or Attending Religious Events Were Never A Problem For Dhanya Rajendran — Until The Cause Changed

JCD Prabhakar Quoting Bible Or Attending Religious Events Were Never A Problem For Dhanya Rajendran — Until The Cause Changed

Tamil Nadu Assembly Speaker J.C.D. Prabhakar attended the 5th National March for Life India 2026 at Stella Maris College on 9 August 2026, sharing the stage with Catholic Archbishop George Antonysamy, unveiling a “Memorial of the Unborn,” and flagging off a public march.

This seems to have set off the leftist-Congress ecosystem.

Most prominent among the voices screaming about this is none other than The News Minute editor Dhanya Rajendran. She was so outraged that she made 2 posts about it. In one she wrote, “Absolutely atrocious that an elected member of the assembly, who is also the Speaker has participated in this.”

And added a follow-up post where she wrote, “It does not matter what JCD Prabhakar’s personal beliefs are. That’s in his house. He holds a constitutional post.

Even Indian women have suffered in countries that deny abortion rights for women. Remember Savita Halappanavar?

The TVK govt has to explain itself. Why did its MLA go for this event?”

Fair question. It would carry more weight if Rajendran had asked it even once before.

A Speaker Who Never Hid His Christian Credentials

JCD Prabhakar’s record as a lay evangelist occupying a constitutional post is not new, and it is not obscure. It has been reported, on the record, repeatedly, for months before Rajendran discovered her outrage this weekend.

In February 2026, on the day of his unanimous election as Speaker on a motion moved by Chief Minister Joseph Vijay, Prabhakar opened his maiden address from the Chair by quoting Job 9:10, Proverbs 3:27, and Mark 12:31 – the first time Christian scripture has been recited in the inaugural address of a Tamil Nadu Assembly Speaker. He later addressed a Christian film trailer launch, speaking like a pastor and framing the evangelical community’s position as one of persecution.

In June 2026, Prabhakar addressed a felicitation event held by the Tamil Nadu Christian Churches Federation, where he told the gathering: “This govt was elected by the majority, but it cares for minorities, make full use of it.” He went further, reading out a list of the Federation’s demands from the floor: police clearance for evangelistic meetings, a monthly stipend for church workers, a subsidy for pilgrimages to Israel, dedicated burial grounds for independent churches, and liquor shops shut on Good Friday and pledged to personally carry each one to the Chief Minister.

By July 2026, an event poster surfaced showing Prabhakar and multiple sitting TVK MLAs, K. Thenarasu, Kumar R., R.V. Senthilkumar, D. Sadhik Basha, R. Manoj, R. Jegatheesan, M.R. Palani as guests at a Christian Churches and Pastors Federation conference headlined by Chief Minister Joseph Vijay himself.

In July 2026, he addressed the gathering at the trailer launch of Prajapathi, a Christian biographical film based on the life and teachings of Jesus Christ where he said, “We are rapidly moving towards an era where proclaiming the Gospel is becoming increasingly difficult” – as if it were his main job.

At no point across any of these, a sitting Speaker reciting scripture from the Chair, reading out a religious lobby’s policy wishlist as a promise, or a Chief Minister headlining a pastors’ conference with his cabinet in tow, did Dhanya Rajendran ask the TVK government to “explain itself.” Her timeline nor her outlet show any comparable posts calling out any of these events. It took an anti-abortion march for the outrage to arrive.

The Outrage Was Never About Christianity & Its Principles

Rajendran’s stated objection to the August 9 event is that Prabhakar, “who holds a constitutional post,” should not be seen advancing anti-abortion advocacy and that his personal beliefs belong “in his house.” Notice what she leaves out even in that framing: the event was organised by CHARIS India alongside the Catholic Archdiocese of Madras-Mylapore, held at a Catholic college, and involved unveiling a memorial with the city’s Archbishop. Her posts mention none of that.

She calls it an abortion issue and stops there; never naming the church bodies running it, never asking the question that need to be asked. The objection she raises is real, but it’s been quietly narrowed to “anti-abortion,” a position she can expect general sympathy for, rather than “a Catholic Archdiocese event,” which would force the same comparison to the pastors’ federation and churches federation events she never raised a word about.

The Standard Changes With The Cause

It is also a position that applies with equal force to a Speaker opening Assembly proceedings with Bible verses or promising a religious federation that police will be instructed to clear evangelistic meetings. If a constitutional officer’s personal faith has no business shaping his public conduct, that standard doesn’t bend for who’s asking, what the ask is, or which faith body is doing the asking.

It bends anyway. When the request was religious infrastructure, burial grounds, and pilgrimage subsidies for one community, it was a “felicitation ceremony,” and the church federation behind it wasn’t named as a problem. When an Archdiocese ran an anti-abortion march, the religious sponsor disappeared from the critique entirely and only the “anti-abortion” label survived, because that’s the label that doesn’t require explaining why the earlier events were fine.

If JCD Prabhakar mixing his faith with his office is “atrocious,” it was atrocious in February. It was atrocious in June. It was atrocious in July. The only thing that changed by August was which cause he was standing next to.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.