Home Blog Page 426

Dhadak 2: A Cheap Propaganda Film That Kills The Soul Of Pariyerum Perumal To Peddle Caste Hatred Against Brahmins

Bollywood’s latest attempt at woke filmmaking, Dhadak 2, is not just a failed remake of the critically acclaimed Tamil film Pariyerum Perumal, it is a deliberate, manipulative distortion of the original’s powerful message against caste violence. Instead of faithfully adapting the story of Dalit oppression that was set in rural Tamil Nadu, the filmmakers have shamelessly twisted the narrative to vilify Brahmins, turning a nuanced social drama into a lazy, agenda-driven propaganda piece.

A Dishonest Remake That Betrays The Original

Pariyerum Perumal was a searing, authentic portrayal of caste oppression, where the protagonist, a Dalit law student, faces systemic violence and humiliation at the hands of dominant intermediate castes (OBCs). The film’s strength lay in its unflinching realism; it showed caste as it exists on the ground, not as some urban elite fantasy.

The strength of Pariyerum Perumal’s director Mari Selvaraj lies in his honest storytelling that steers clear of inciting hatred. He resists the temptation to villainize any community by deliberately avoiding caste markers—be it through names, symbols, or traditional cues.

But Dhadak 2 guts the soul of the original and replaces it with a caricature. The villains in this version are no longer the actual oppressors (Thakurs, Yadavs, or other dominant castes who historically wield power in North India) and instead, they are turned into Brahmins, a soft target that Bollywood loves to demonize without consequence.

Brahmin-Bashing: A Cowardly Cop-Out

The film is out and out a Brahmin bashing one – it starts out by indicating who the male lead is, which community he is from. Then he is shown to be studying in a college where he is surrounded by people with Brahmin surnames. Let’s come back to reality for a bit – which government institution do you see so many Brahmin students? Reservation has eaten up so many bright students that you will only see other dominant castes in any institution. Either the film must have been shown to be set way back in time or must show the reality of who occupies the seats in government institutions.

The decision to replace the original oppressors with Brahmins reeks of intellectual dishonesty and political cowardice. In reality, Dalits in North India face violence primarily from dominant OBCs and feudal castes like Thakurs, not Brahmins, who have little political or social power in rural oppression today. But showing dominant influential castes as villains would invite real backlash, so the filmmakers take the easy way out which is blatant propaganda.

There is also a scene where they try to show meat-eating Brahmins mingling with non-meat-eating Brahmins – trying to call out the so-called hypocrisy.

A Messy, Half-Baked Narrative

Beyond its manipulative politics, Dhadak 2 is simply a bad film. The storytelling is inconsistent, the emotional beats feel forced, and the social message is diluted by unnecessary subplots. Siddhant Chaturvedi’s suffering as Neelesh lacks the raw intensity of Kathir’s performance in the original. A few brutal scenes land, but the film never sustains the tension.

Worst of all, it fails where Pariyerum Perumal succeeded – by turning caste oppression into a simplistic “evil Brahmins vs. noble Dalits” fairy tale, rather than a complex, systemic issue. The original showed how caste violence is perpetuated by multiple layers of society; this remake reduces it to cheap villainy.

Final Verdict: Exploitative & Cowardly

Dhadak 2 is an irresponsible film that weaponizes caste politics for shallow sensationalism. By distorting reality and scapegoating Brahmins, it does a disservice to the very cause it pretends to champion. If Bollywood truly wanted to make a “powerful political statement”, it would have had the guts to show the real oppressors. Instead, it took the path of least resistance, peddling hatred against a community that is already a favorite punching bag of the elite.

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Trump Threatens To Raise Tariffs On India Over Russian Oil Trade

trump tariffs king india us russian oil

US President Donald Trump issued a fresh threat on Monday to “substantially” increase tariffs on India as a penalty, for what he alleged, for selling imported Russian oil on the open market for “big profits”.

He did not say what the additional tariff on top of the 25 per cent he announced on Friday would be. Trump has been frustrated by Russia’s President Vladimir Putin’s refusal to end the Ukraine War and is directing his ire against India to pressure Moscow.

He wrote on Truth Social: “India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian Oil, they are then, for much of the Oil purchased, selling it on the Open Market for big profits.” “They don’t care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine. Because of this, I will be substantially raising the Tariff paid by India to the USA,” he said.

Trump had initially said the penalty, known as secondary tariffs, applying to all buyers of Russian apply would be 100 per cent. He moved the deadline for Russia to agree to a ceasefire with Ukraine to late this week.

News reports over the weekend quoted unidentified Indian officials as saying in response to Trump’s earlier threats that New Delhi would continue to buy Russian oil, setting off the fresh outrage from Trump. While he focused on India, he did not say if a China that also buys a substantial amount of Russian oil would face similar penalties – or other countries like Turkey would too.

The US and China are negotiating a trade deal, and if Trump were to impose tariff penalties, it would complicate the talks. According to the International Energy Agency, India bought nearly 40 per cent of its imports from Russia, and 70 per cent of Moscow’s oil exports went to India.

Before the Ukraine War, India had bought only about 0.2 per cent of its needs from Russia, but it steeply increased after embargoes were placed on Russian oil, while keeping the price below the European Union-mandated price of $60 per barrel. Some of the refined petrol and other oil products were reportedly exported by Indian refineries.

On Friday, when there were reports that India’s oil imports from Russia were coming down, Trump had called it a “good step”, if true. He told reporters: “I understand that India is no longer going to be buying oil from Russia. That’s what I heard. I don’t know if that’s right or not. That is a good step. We will see what happens.”

Earlier, he wrote on Truth Social, “I don’t care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care.” That figured in a war of words with former Russian President Dmitri Medvedev playing on the word “dead”, leading ultimately to Trump moving two nuclear submarines to strategic locations.

Russia could also retaliate against the punitive tariffs by shutting off the Caspian Pipeline Consortium line that transports Kazakh oil through Russia to western Europe. There is also the risk of the oil prices spiking if India, the world’s third-largest importer of oil, is forced to buy from the general market, which would also affect the US.

Meanwhile, Indian government sources have clarified that there is no pause on the oil imports from Russia. According to sources, “India’s energy purchases are driven by national interests and market forces. We do not have any reports of Indian oil firms halting Russian imports”.

MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said last week that “You are aware of our broad approach to energy sourcing requirements, that we look at what is available in the market and the prevailing global situation. We are not aware of any specifics”. India sources its oil purchases based on global market offerings to meet its energy needs.

“Our ties with any country stand on their merit and should not be seen from the prism of a third country. As far as India-Russia relations are concerned, we have a steady and time-tested partnership,” said the MEA spokesperson.

-IANS

Subscribe to our TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram channels and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

India Slams US Tariff Threats Over Russian Oil, Calls Targeting ‘Unjustified’

india us tariff threat

The Indian government on Monday said that the targeting of the country by the US over Russian oil purchase is unjustified and unreasonable, after American President Donald Trump threatened to impose hefty tariffs on New Delhi.

An official statement said that like any major economy, “India will take all necessary measures to safeguard its national interests and economic security”. According to the government, India has been targeted by the United States and the European Union for importing oil from Russia after the commencement of the Ukraine conflict.

“In fact, India began importing from Russia because traditional supplies were diverted to Europe after the outbreak of the conflict. The United States at that time actively encouraged such imports by India for strengthening global energy markets stability,” the Centre emphasised.

“India’s imports are meant to ensure predictable and affordable energy costs to the Indian consumer. They are a necessity compelled by global market situation. However, it is revealing that the very nations criticizing India are themselves indulging in trade with Russia. Unlike our case, such trade is not even a vital national compulsion,” the government highlighted.

New Delhi reacted after Trump threatened to substantially raise tariffs on India for purchasing oil from Russia. “India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian Oil, they are then, for much of the Oil purchased, selling it on the Open Market for big profits. They don’t care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine,” Trump wrote in his social media post.

“Because of this, I will be substantially raising the Tariff paid by India to the USA,” he added. According to the Indian government, the European Union in 2024 had a bilateral trade of Euro 67.5 billion in goods with Russia.

In addition, it had trade in services estimated at Euro 17.2 billion in 2023. “This is significantly more than India’s total trade with Russia that year or subsequently. European imports of LNG in 2024, in fact, reached a record 16.5 million tonnes, surpassing the last record of 15.21 million tonnes in 2022. Europe-Russia trade includes not just energy, but also fertilizers, mining products, chemicals, iron and steel and machinery and transport equipment,” said the official statement.

The government further stated that where the United States is concerned, it continues to import from Russia uranium hexafluoride for its nuclear industry, palladium for its EV industry, fertilizers as well as chemicals.

“In this background, the targeting of India is unjustified and unreasonable. Like any major economy, India will take all necessary measures to safeguard its national interests and economic security,” the government stressed.

-IANS

Subscribe to our TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram channels and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

How The US Backed India’s Russian Oil Imports To Stabilise Global Energy Markets

russian oil import india us

As US President Donald Trump threatened to substantially raise tariffs on India over Russian oil purchase, the fact is that America has actively encouraged such imports by India in the past for strengthening global energy market stability.

In November 2022, US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen remarked: “The United States is happy for India to continue buying as much Russian oil as it wants, including at prices above a G7-imposed price cap mechanism, if it steers clear of Western insurance, finance and maritime services bound by the cap.”

In March 2024, Amos Hochstein, former US President Joe Biden’s energy and global infrastructure adviser, said, “At the end of the day, my goal is not to take it off the market, I’m not looking to take these tankers, take the crude, the product, off the market”.

In February 2024, US Assistant Secretary of State Geoffrey Pyatt acknowledged India’s role in stabilising global energy markets, saying, “India has played a key role in efforts to stabilise global energy markets through its purchases of Russian crude.”

In May 2024, US Ambassador to India Eric Garcetti admitted that India bought Russian oil because the US wanted somebody to buy Russian oil. “The US allowed the purchase to take place to ensure the prices did not go up globally,” he added. Garcetti also highlighted that due to this arrangement, global oil prices didn’t shoot up and “India delivered on that.”

Meanwhile, the Indian government has categorically said that the targeting of the country by the US over Russian oil purchase is unjustified and unreasonable, after American President Donald Trump threatened to impose hefty tariffs on New Delhi.

An official statement said that, like any major economy, “India will take all necessary measures to safeguard its national interests and economic security”. India has been targeted by the United States and the European Union for importing oil from Russia after the commencement of the Ukraine conflict.

Where the United States is concerned, it continues to import from Russia uranium hexafluoride for its nuclear industry, palladium for its EV industry, fertilisers, as well as chemicals.

-IANS

Subscribe to our TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram channels and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

PM Modi To Address NDA Parliamentary Meet Today Amid Monsoon Session

New Criminal Laws Freed India From Colonial Legacy As Envisioned By Constitution: PM Modi nda parliamentary meet handloom sector national handloom day

Prime Minister Narendra Modi will address the NDA Parliamentary Party meeting on Tuesday, marking the first such gathering during the ongoing Monsoon Session of Parliament.

The high-stakes meeting, being held in the Parliament complex, will see the participation of all Members of Parliament from the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and its alliance partners. Attendance has been made mandatory for all NDA MPs.

This NDA Parliamentary Party meeting comes at a crucial juncture, just two days ahead of the opening of nominations for the Vice-President’s election, scheduled to begin on August 7.

With the NDA holding a clear majority in the electoral college, the selection of its Vice-Presidential candidate is anticipated to be a formality. However, the alliance is expected to finalise and announce its nominee by August 21, the last date for filing nominations, aligning with the end of the current session.

PM Modi will be honoured during the meeting, particularly for the success of Operation Sindoor, a counter-terrorism mission launched in the aftermath of the recent Pahalgam terror attack.

The Prime Minister’s address is expected to address this critical operation, the nation’s security challenges, and several ongoing political issues that are dominating parliamentary discourse. The Monsoon Session has largely been disrupted so far, with the Opposition staging continuous protests, particularly over the Election Commission’s Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar.

The Opposition alleges that the revision exercise is politically motivated and biased in favour of the ruling party. PM Modi is also expected to respond to these accusations, reaffirm the government’s stance on the electoral process, and lay out the NDA’s legislative priorities for the remainder of the session.

-IANS

Subscribe to our TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram channels and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Two Dead, Six Injured In Mass Shooting In Downtown Los Angeles

los angeles mass shooting america usa emory university austin target store elementary school arkansas high school pennsylvania

Two people were killed and six others wounded in a mass shooting in downtown Los Angeles, the US state of California, local authorities said. The incident occurred around 1 a.m. (0800 GMT) on Monday, near 14th Place and Griffith Avenue, where several parties were underway, according to the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD).

LAPD officers spotted someone entering what they believed was an unauthorised gathering of over 50 people late Sunday night. Officers shut down the party and arrested one attendee for gun possession, Xinhua news agency reported.

A few hours later, police returned to the same location after reports of gunfire and found eight people shot. A man was pronounced dead at the scene, while a 52-year-old woman died later in hospital. The six injured victims, aged between 26 and 62, included two in critical condition, police said. Authorities have not announced any arrests or identified a possible motive. The investigation is underway.

Earlier on Friday, four people were killed in a bar shooting in Anaconda, US state of Montana, local media reported, citing law enforcement officials. The shooting occurred at The Owl Bar in Anaconda, a city located in southwestern Montana. The suspect was identified as Michael Paul Brown, according to a Facebook post by the Anaconda-Deer Lodge County Law Enforcement Center.

“Be advised suspect in shooting is believed to be armed and dangerous,” said the post. Officials posted a photo of the suspect on Facebook and advised the public to stay out of the Stumptown area and surrounding areas.

-IANS

Subscribe to our TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram channels and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Kashmir Marks August 5 With Normalcy Amid Rumours Of Change

Kashmir Marks August 5 With Normalcy Amid Rumours of Change Jammu & Kashmir After Article 370: Integration, Infrastructure, And Investment

On the sixth anniversary of the abrogation of Article 370 and the bifurcation of Jammu and Kashmir into two union territories, the valley was normal as it was a day like any other.

Rumours and counter-rumours battled in the minds of locals as WhatsApp groups went agog with speculations of statehood restoration or further division of the UT. The grapevine has always had strong elements of credibility in Kashmir.

Rumours have, most of the time, remained ahead of hard news, and this is the main reason that the rumour mill starts moving fast as events on the occasion provide grist to the fertile minds of the rumour mongers.

Chief Minister Omar Abdullah said on X that he would stick his neck out to bet that nothing bad was going to happen on August 5. He hastened to add that nothing good was expected today. The calling of Prime Minister Narendra Modi on the President, followed by Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Monday, plus a high-level meeting in Delhi to discuss the security situation in Jammu and Kashmir on the eve of August 5, the day when six years ago J&K lost its special status, gave fuel to speculations.

Those in power, including the National Conference supporters, said a bill would be tabled in Parliament to restore statehood to JK. Detractors said JK was in for another division that would give statehood to the Jammu division and retain the Valley as a UT without a legislature.

Everybody claimed to know what he said without any material basis except speculation. Those proclaiming to be Kashmir experts said nothing should be done in haste, as the prevailing peace needed to be consolidated.

Others claiming to be on-ground reporters said any further division of J&K would fuel further alienation among the youth. The common man started worrying about the availability of food and medicine if anything big development takes place, while the affluent ones topped the fuel tanks of their private cars and SUVs.

While rumours have their place in Kashmir and this space gets credibility the moment an official denial is issued, the good news is that Kashmir rose normally on Tuesday, school buses came to collect children, shops and transport started as usual with office goers rushing through a modest breakfast to reach places of duty on time.

Except for some preventive house arrests to maintain law and order on the 6th anniversary of 5 August 2019, everything started normally in the Valley as it was business as usual. Better luck to rumour mongers next time, they at least keep idle minds busy so that these don’t become the devil’s workshop.

-IANS

Subscribe to our TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram channels and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Dravidian Model Tamil Nadu: Gruesome Killings Forces Entire Village To Flee In Fear In Sivaganga District

A chilling wave of violence has gripped Nattangudi, a small village in Tamil Nadu’s Sivaganga district, following a series of brutal murders that have left the local community deeply shaken.

The fear began to spread after Sonai Muthu, a resident of the village, was found beheaded under mysterious circumstances. His shocking death appears to be part of a disturbing pattern of killings, sparking widespread panic.

Nattangudi, home to around 50 families and already struggling with the lack of even basic amenities, has now become a ghost village. Fearing for their lives, residents fled en masse overnight, abandoning their homes and livelihoods. As per current reports, only one elderly man remains in the otherwise deserted settlement.

The scale and brutality of the crimes have sent shockwaves through the region, prompting the local police to launch an intensified investigation into the murders and the circumstances surrounding them.

Subscribe to our TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram channels and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Class 11 Student Found Dead In Tirupattur’s Dominic Savio Boys School Hostel Well; Family, Locals Demand Probe

In a tragic incident, a Class 11 student was found dead under mysterious circumstances inside a well located on the premises of a government-aided school in Tirupattur on 3 August 2025. The deceased, identified as Mugilan, was a resident student at the Dominic Savio Higher Secondary School and hailed from Kothur village in Natrampalli taluk.

Although the well had been mostly secured with an iron grille, it featured a narrow opening large enough for a person to pass through. Police have initiated an investigation to determine the circumstances that led to the boy’s death.

Mugilan had been reported missing since 1 August, when his absence in class prompted teachers to contact his family. Unable to trace him, his parents lodged a missing person’s complaint at the Tirupattur Town police station. Following this, a search was launched, and on 3 August, with the assistance of a dog squad, the boy’s body was discovered floating in the well near the hostel.

Emergency services, including the fire department, were called in to recover the body, which was then sent to the Tirupattur Government Hospital for autopsy. Police have registered a case under Section 194 of the Bharatiya Nyay Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), relating to death by drowning.

ADSP Govindaraju, who inspected the location, stated that the well is approximately 600 meters away from the main school building and located in a remote corner of the playground. “While the well is largely sealed off, it has a small entry point and a ladder inside, which could allow someone small to enter,” he explained. Based on current evidence, police suspect it could be a suicide, though they await the postmortem findings to draw any conclusions.

The tragedy took an emotional toll on the family. Mugilan’s father, devastated by the news, reportedly attempted to jump into the same well but was saved by the police. Mugilan leaves behind his parents and four sisters.

In the aftermath, grief turned into anger as the boy’s family, along with members of political parties including the TVK and AIADMK, held a protest demanding the school’s closure and accountability from the school authorities. Vellore Superintendent of Police Mayilvaganan met with the demonstrators to address their concerns. Mugilan’s sister, speaking to the media, dismissed the possibility of suicide, “He always informed us about everything, even trivial matters. He would never take such a step.”

Criticism also mounted over the delayed discovery of the body. ADSP Govindaraju defended the initial search efforts, noting that the well is located in a locked and secluded area of the campus, and hence, the search had been focused elsewhere at first. “It was only when the dog squad was brought in that the body was found,” he said.

Reacting to the incident, BJP state president Nainar Nagenthran posted on X (formerly Twitter), expressing deep sorrow and questioning why the school administration failed to thoroughly check the entire campus, especially since the student had been missing for two days.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Telangana High Court Quashes Defamation Case Against Actor Siddharth Over Alleged Lewd Tweet On Saina Nehwal

The Telangana High Court recently quashed criminal proceedings against Tamil actor Siddharth, who was accused of posting a sexist and defamatory tweet about badminton champion Saina Nehwal in January 2022.

Justice Juvvadi Sridevi, presiding over the case, ruled in favour of Siddharth’s petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, stating that the core elements required to establish offences under Section 67 of the Information Technology Act and Section 509 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) were absent.

The controversy stemmed from a tweet Siddharth posted in response to Nehwal’s remarks on a security lapse involving the Prime Minister.  His tweet read, “Subtle cock champion of the world…Thank God we have protectors of India. (Sic) Shame on you #Rihanna.”

This triggered a social media storm following which the National Commission for Women has taken cognizance of the matter. Later, writing a letter to the DGP of Tamil Nadu

Despite several women leaders and activists calling out Siddharth for his tweet, the actor has put another tweet justified his remark during the period.

Although, the court observed that the statement meant humorously was misinterpreted, and did not meet the threshold for criminal action under the alleged provisions.

The complaint was initially lodged in the XII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Court in Nampally, Hyderabad, by a third party, who claimed the tweet was derogatory and harmed Nehwal’s reputation. However, the High Court clarified that the complainant had no direct connection to the matter, rendering the case procedurally flawed due to lack of locus standi.

Siddharth defended his post by stating it was made in good faith and in exercise of free speech, without malicious intent. He further explained that the tweet referenced the common idiom “cock-and-bull story” and not intended as a personal insult. He also issued a clarification and apology four days after the post.

Notably, Saina Nehwal herself acknowledged Siddharth’s apology in a press statement dated 13 January 2022, and expressed satisfaction with his explanation.

Despite arguments by the state’s Assistant Public Prosecutor that the matter involved triable issues better suited for trial, the court emphasized that the investigation lacked substance. It pointed out that no witnesses, including Nehwal or Twitter representatives, had been examined to support the accusations.

The court further ruled that Section 67 of the IT Act which deals with sexually explicit content online did not apply, as the tweet lacked any sexual undertone or intent. Similarly, the alleged act did not qualify under Section 509 IPC, which requires intent to insult a woman’s modesty.

After reviewing the FIR and charge sheet, the court concluded that, even if all allegations were taken at face value, no cognizable offence had been committed. Consequently, the case against Siddharth was dismissed.

This is not the first time Siddharth has indulged in cyber-bullying and online harassment. Earlier in September 2021, the controversial actor unleashed abuses on a netizen who had questioned him.

(With Inputs From Live law)

Subscribe to our TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram channels and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.