Facebook Instagram X Youtube
Tuesday, July 28, 2026
Facebook Instagram X Youtube
Home Blog Page 412

The Science Of Sanskrit: Sadhguru Writes For The Commune

By
Sadhguru JV
-

If you know a little bit of science, you know that if you feed a sound into an oscilloscope – an instrument used to measure signals – depending upon the sound’s frequency and amplitude, the oscilloscope will give out a certain form. It is an established fact that every sound has a form attached to it. Similarly, every form has a sound attached to it. Sanskrit language was discovered by people who observed different forms in the existence and identified the sound attached to that particular form.

Sanskrit is not an invented language in the sense that, other languages are made up for the sake of communication. For example, in English, we use the sound “mic” to refer to a mic. But we could have called it anything – “boom,” “toom,” “ teen,” or whatever else. We can actually invent a new language. This is how, when the need for communication came, different cultures invented different languages. But Sanskrit language was not invented in this way.

When you utter a sound in Sanskrit, there is a communication – not just between you and me; there is a communication between you and what you are referring to. If you say “surya,” you are not just saying “surya” to make someone understand. When you say “surya,” the sound surya is connecting to the form surya. That means you get closer to the life process by just uttering these sounds.

That is the reason why when Sanskrit is taught, it has to be learnt by rote. People just chant the language endlessly. It does not matter whether you know the meaning or not. The sound is important, not the meaning. Meanings are made up in your mind.

Different types of sounds have a different impact on your mind and body, and one important aspect to activate and stimulate the brain is language. Today, many of the elite schools in UK, Germany and other parts of the world teach Sanskrit because they see that just uttering these sounds stimulates the brain. Suppose we left you in a hall and made a lot of noise for a whole day. You would want to run away from there. Initially, you may think it is fun, but after some time, it has a negative impact on your system. Your body and mind begin to suffer in some way. But suppose we play some gentle music instead, there will be no need to run away from it. Similarly, the Sanskrit language was consciously created so that just uttering the language will purify the system.

Above all, Sanskrit also uses your ability to utter sounds in every possible way. Once you speak the Sanskrit language, you can learn almost any language in the world effortlessly because you would have used your tongue in every possible way, which you would not do when you speak English. Sanskrit language has a phonetic possibility of causing the maximum number of sound vibrations within the system and activating the human system to its fullest capacity.

Ranked amongst the fifty most influential people in India, Sadhguru is a Yogi, mystic, visionary and a New York Times bestselling author. Sadhguru has been conferred the Padma Vibhushan by the Government of India in 2017, the highest annual civilian award, accorded for exceptional and distinguished service. He is also the founder of the world’s largest people’s movement, Conscious Planet– Save Soil, which has touched over 4 billion people.

When ‘Melting Point’ Had A Meltdown: DMK Spokie Saravanan Goes On Abusive Spree Against AIADMK Spokesperson

By
The Commune
-

What was supposed to be a political debate on News18 Tamil Nadu’s Sollathigaaram quickly turned into a full-blown verbal brawl. DMK spokesperson Saravanan Annadurai didn’t just argue his point — he unloaded a stream of personal insults on AIADMK IT Wing President M. Kovai Sathyan. The topic on paper was coalition politics, but within minutes it was all about name-calling and shouting. The anchor, instead of reining things in, seemed happy to let the DMK man go off, adding fuel to long-standing accusations that the channel plays cheerleader for the ruling party rather than referee.

The controversy unfolded during the debate show Sollathigaaram, where the topic of discussion was, “Is the DMK Dominating the Alliance?” Kovai Sathyan, representing the AIADMK, was interrupted repeatedly as he attempted to respond to the panel. As soon as he made his comment, he was cut off by DMK spokesperson and Joint Secretary of the party’s media wing, Saravanan Annadurai, who launched personal attacks. Rather than intervening, the show’s anchor, Balavel Chakravarthi, appeared to join in the verbal onslaught.

The back-and-forth continued for nearly three minutes, with Kovai Sathyan struggling to make his point. Eventually, the host shifted focus to another panelist, effectively sidelining Sathyan. AIADMK supporters have called this a deliberate move to prevent any meaningful critique of the DMK, accusing the channel of stifling opposition voices under the guise of moderation.

Below are the excerpts from the Debate:

Kovai Sathyan said, “I’ll sum it up in one line. A grandfather who once boarded a train without a ticket now has a family listed among Asia’s richest.”

This triggered an immediate outburst from Saravanan and the anchor. Despite Sathyan clarifying that he hadn’t named anyone and that the viewers should decide the intent, the anchor insisted his comment was inappropriate.

Anchor responded saying, “We are trying to use good words and having a dignified, constructive conversation. You (sathyan) asked for a chance to respond to his comments, I’m giving you time.”

Saravanan angrily shouted saying, “Yow! Stop it. Stop it. Are you a human? you are a person who celebrates person who twisted incense sticks. You are a person who celebrates person who went to jail as ‘thalaivi’. What are they speaking? A person who buttress for the corrupt party. Why are you calling such low-level person for debate?”

Sathyan retorted, “Did I name anyone?”

Saravanan was shouting repeatedly saying, “Why are you calling such low-level person for debate?” He was repeatedly stressing these word many times.

Anchor said, “We are using good words and having a dignified, constructive conversation. You (sathyan) asked for a chance to respond to his comments, I’m giving you time, but why are you misusing it?”

Sathyan again asked, “Did I name anyone?” Anchor replied, “The same rhetoric he puts forth. He also says they twisted incense sticks.” Anchor asked, “Is that a necessary argument?”

Sathyan retorted, “Let the people decide which is necessary or not. Have I named anyone? Only the guilty conscience reacting.”

Anchor buttressed saying, “That’s different, used in the street-corner meeting talk. You asked for an opportunity but the answer for the question was not this. I’m the host I should say that was not the answer.”

Sathyan called out his hypocrisy saying, “No. No. Even when he uses unparliamentary language, you don’t interrupt. Yet, I’m being cut off.”  

Anchor tried to buttress his stance saying, “I told you I’d give you the time to respond. You didn’t use that opportunity properly.”

Sathyan responding sharply, “Alright, let’s me keep it like this. The Karunanidhi family who once boarded a train without a ticket.”

Saravanan shouting said, “He comes from a party that celebrates murder convicts! What can we expect? Don’t bring such low-level people to debates. Don’t you have shame? Shameless!”

Finally Sathyan blasted Saravanan saying, “I’m saying this now, I don’t want to cross my boundaries of decorum. If it’s a public meeting, set up a stage Saravanan; can speak wherever he wants. Let’s see how you talk and how I talk. Just wearing a coat suit doesn’t make you a civilized person; it’s in the words you speak. Learn that first.”

Yet Saravanan provoked him saying, “Lowlife.”

Throughout the exchange, the anchor chose to reprimand only Kovai Sathyan, remarking, “That applies to Sathyan as well,” while pointedly remaining silent about Saravanan’s repeated slurs.

Past Incident Highlights Pattern of Alleged Bias

This is not the first time News18 Tamil Nadu has been accused of silencing AIADMK representatives. In an earlier debate on the 2025 Tamil Nadu Budget, senior AIADMK leader Kalyanasundaram clashed with the channel’s Editor-in-Chief, Karthigaichelvan.

During the debate, Kalyanasundaram was trying to make a point about ‘Earned Leave Surrender System’ for state government employees when Karthigaichelvan interjected and said, “He’s talking about Surrender Leave. Who stopped it? What I’m asking is what did they promise in their election manifesto for government workers?”to which Karthigaichelvan interjected and asked “Did your (AIADMK) government stop it or not is what I’m asking? Okay.. You’re saying they (DMK) didn’t fulfil their promise.”

Irked by Karthigaichelvan’s intervention, Kalyanasundaram responded saying “Do you want my response or do you want me to support whatever he (DMK MLA I. Paranthamen) says and leave?” This statement of Kalyanasundaram seems to have unsettled News 18 Tamil Nadu Editor-in-Chief Karthigaichelvan.

Kalyanasundaram continued that in the first round of the debate itself he posed the question of the DMK government not fulfilling its promise to government workers. And just as he completed, Karthigaichelvan interjected again saying “I’m coming to you sir” repeatedly to which Kalyanasundaram angrily responded “You keep watching him (DMK spokesperson) talk but when I talk for every line you keep interjecting and saying – I’m coming to you, I’m coming to you. Tell me. You ask your question fully and then I’ll answer. He (DMK spokesperson) is blatantly talking lies and you allow that but you keep intervening whenever I talk.“

With Kalyanasundaram exposing the bias of Karthigaichelvan, the latter took to defend himself saying “I’m not asking you any question now. Whatever criticisms you have against me, you say.” Kalyanasundaram further asked “Sir, don’t keep talking like this. Why do you want to do this (virtue-signalling) only during my chance?” to which Karthigaichelvan challenged that he never made any interventions during the first round.

Kalyanasundaram however pointed that Karthigaichelvan never dared to make an intervention when the DMK spokesperson was speaking and peddling lies. “You ask your questions first completely. I will respond later,” the AIADMK spokesperson thundered at Karthigaichelvan to which the latter responded that he can take the time he wants to convey his points and not cast aspersions on him.

“I don’t expect Kalyanasundaram to be like other people. He’s a very knowledgeable person. I am expecting your point of view. Both of you belong to main parties. Please come up with points. There’s nothing in criticising me,” said Karthigaichelvan.

“Why did you intervene now?” Kalyanasundaram asked once again to which Karthigaichelvan said “What I’m saying is, criticisms against me is unwarranted and that I was coming to ask about your point only.” The News 18 Tamil Nadu Editor-In-Chief kept on justifying that he didn’t intervene at all.

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Dravidian Stock Journo Nelson Xavier Mocks Varalakshmi Pooja In ‘The Debate’ Channel, Another D-Stock Anchor Avudaiappan & Drug Case Accused Islamist Filmmaker Ameer Laugh

By
The Commune
-

The Dravidian ecosystem recently held a closed-door meeting under the pretext of “opposing caste,” but in reality, the event turned into a platform for mocking and criticising Hinduism, its practices, and Hindu gods. Some speakers, like Karu Palaniappan, went so far as to audaciously declare the “need to annihilate Hinduism” in guise of quoting others, while shamelessly spreading the blatant lie that Ambedkar urged people to convert to Islam when he infact wrote a scathing book criticizing Islam.

This entire programme by The Debate was nothing but a propaganda session against Hinduism, with only a select audience present.

Right at the start of his speech, Karu Palaniappan plunged into his anti-Hindu stance, saying, “When asked what was the way to abolish caste, Vanniyararasu answered Ameer’s question by saying, ‘The answer to this is the same one given by the revolutionary Ambedkar: ‘Annihilation of Caste’.’ He said that the way to abolish caste is to abolish the Hindu religion (peddled his own translation). There is another way. What is that way? It is to fully support inter-caste marriages that happen within Hinduism. If you support them, what will happen? Will caste be abolished? Caste will not be abolished, it will create confusion. So, for clarity to come, confusion is needed. Once there is confusion, clarity will come.” He then went off into a rambling and irrelevant family anecdote that even he likely couldn’t make sense of.

Later in the video while Karu Palaniappan was speaking, he asked the audience, “Why is the Varalakshmi function celebrated?” A Dravidianist journalist Nelson Xavier mockingly replied, “For Varalakshmi to be well,” prompting laughter from another D-Stock anchor, Avudaiappan and Islamist filmmaker Ameer Sultan who is involved in a drug case. The two exchanged chuckles, triggering laughter across the hall. These two are presented as “neutral” journalists in Tamil media, holding prominent positions.

In another segment of the event, Karu Palaniappan again peddled the falsehood that Ambedkar wanted people to convert to Islam, here to cleverly quoting others conveniently hiding the fact that Ambedkar himself rejected Islam and embraced Buddhism.

He said, “If you want to abolish the filth of caste, what is the way? Like Vanniyarasu said, the revolutionary Ambedkar says the way is to convert to Islam. Periyar says it, everyone says it, right? But I will not convert. I will cause a commotion from within. Why should I leave? I will stay inside and do it.”

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Indian Air Force Shot Down 5 Pakistani Fighter Jets And A Military Aircraft During Operation Sindoor, Rahul Gandhi’s Pro-Pakistan Propaganda Falls Flat

By
The Commune
-

The Indian Air Force has officially revealed that six Pakistani aircraft—five fighter jets and one large surveillance plane—were destroyed during Operation Sindoor. This marks the first detailed disclosure of the damage inflicted on Pakistan during the large-scale military operation launched in the wake of the April 22 Pahalgam massacre.

The larger aircraft was identified as an AEW&C (Airborne Early Warning and Control) platform, a critical asset for Pakistan’s air defence, whose loss significantly weakened its aerial capabilities. According to Air Chief Marshal A.P. Singh, the AEW&C was targeted from a distance of nearly 300 km—making it the longest recorded surface-to-air kill in history. The Air Chief noted that in addition to the six airborne kills, Pakistani assets were also destroyed on the ground in precision strikes on airbases.

Highlighting the impact of the newly inducted Russian-made S-400 missile defence system, Singh described it as a “game-changer” that prevented Pakistan from deploying long-range precision weapons like glide bombs, as their aircraft could not breach Indian air defences.

The IAF conducted strikes on Jacobabad and Bholari airbases, destroying F-16 fighter jets that were under maintenance and possibly another AEW&C aircraft. “We have indications that at least one AWACS was inside the hangar, along with multiple F-16s,” Singh confirmed.

The damage was so severe that, according to the Air Chief Marshal, Pakistan recognised that prolonging the conflict would only result in heavier losses—prompting them to seek a ceasefire. He credited the success of the operation to unrestricted political backing, explaining that the forces were given complete freedom to escalate and plan operations without interference, ensuring a calibrated but decisive military response.

Satellite images and local media photos were used to document the destruction, addressing lessons learned from the Balakot airstrike, when proof of damage was heavily contested. In total, the IAF hit nine terror targets across Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, eliminating over 100 terrorists linked to the Pahalgam attack.

The American Mirage: How U.S. Power Masks Colonialism, Cultural Erasure, And Ecological Destruction

By
Gopi Shankar Madurai
-

The United States of America projects itself as the pinnacle of democracy, a model for the world to emulate. Yet, this image is a carefully crafted illusion, not a “Maya” but a mirage, built on manipulation, exploitation, and the erasure of diverse governance systems. Far from embodying democratic ideals, the U.S. was founded on the blood of indigenous peoples, its narrative of freedom masking a history of violence and colonialism. The world, captivated by America’s military might and cultural exports, often overlooks the deep state orchestrating a global agenda that prioritizes U.S. gain at the expense of others’ sovereignty and ecological balance.

The U.S. was not established as a response to oppressive colonial forces, as its mythology suggests. Its origins lie in the displacement and genocide of indigenous populations, whose lands were seized to build a nation that now lectures the world on liberty. The Declaration of Independence and Constitution, celebrated as triumphs, were crafted by men who owned slaves and excluded indigenous peoples, African Americans, and women from their vision of freedom. This hypocrisy is not a historical relic but a foundation that continues to shape America’s global interactions.

When nations look to the U.S. as a model, they are seduced by a mirage. The American military, often admired for its strength, is a tool of coercion, not protection. Interventions in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya have destabilized regions, dismantled local governance, and left chaos under the guise of spreading democracy. The deep state—a nexus of corporate, political, and military interests—pulls the strings, ensuring American hegemony thrives at the cost of others’ autonomy. Aspiring to such a model is not a mark of pride but a surrender to exploitation.

America’s global influence is a carefully staged puppet show. Hollywood, consumerism, and the dollar’s dominance are tools of soft power that entrench the U.S. as the arbiter of global aspirations. Nations emulating this model often become ensnared in dependency, their economies tied to American interests through trade, military alliances, and debt. The U.S. cannot be a loyal ally; its partnerships are transactional, designed to serve its own ends. From overthrowing governments in Latin America to supporting authoritarian regimes aligned with its interests, America prioritizes power over principle.

This American design has systematically eroded diverse governance systems worldwide. From the intricate, community-driven structures of Hindu societies to the communal councils of African and Pacific tribes, humanity has sustained governance rooted in local wisdom and ecological harmony. Yet, the U.S. and its colonial predecessors have replaced these with Western models prioritizing individualism and materialism. The result is a homogenized world order that forces nations to live out America’s dreams, erasing their unique identities and philosophies.

Nature suffers under this American-led system. The pursuit of economic growth, driven by Western consumerism, has pushed the planet to the brink. Forests are felled, rivers polluted, and ecosystems collapse—all in the name of a progress defined by American standards. As the world’s largest per capita consumer of resources, the U.S. sets a destructive example, urging others to follow in a race toward environmental collapse. Nature, indifferent to currency or societal constructs, bears the brunt of this greed.

The human toll is equally profound. The Abrahamic world order, with the U.S. at its helm, has marginalized true global minorities—indigenous communities like the Tamils, Tibetans, Yazidis, and countless African and Pacific tribes. These groups, whose philosophies are tied to the land, have seen their cultures erased or commodified. The American model, rooted in Eurocentric ideals, dismisses these systems as primitive, imposing structures that serve colonial interests. This creates a fractured humanity, divided by artificial identities—religion, political ideology, nationalism—that fuel conflict and alienation.

Conflicts like the Russia-Ukraine and Israel-Palestine wars highlight the neo-colonial ambitions of the U.S. and its European allies. These are not just geopolitical struggles but displays of Western power and ruthlessness. The U.S. profits from the global arms trade, perpetuating violence to maintain dominance. The suffering of millions is reduced to collateral damage in a game where Washington sets the rules.

Figures like Donald Trump embody this Eurocentric, narcissistic hegemony. His rise exposed the fragility of the American myth, revealing a nation driven by self-interest and division. Trump is not an outlier but a product of a system that has always valued power over ethics. His leadership laid bare the colonial underpinnings of the U.S., a nation that thrives on exploiting others while cloaking its actions in the rhetoric of freedom.

The world must awaken to reject this American mirage. Healing the planet demands questioning the divisive constructs—religious, political, cultural—that deepen humanity’s fractures. We must return to the wisdom of indigenous systems, including the diverse, community-centric Hindu structures, which prioritized harmony with nature over individual gain. History shows that great powers, from empires to dynasties, rise and fall. The current American state, like those before it, must give way for humanity to evolve.

To break free, nations must reclaim their sovereignty and reject the materialism peddled by Hollywood and corporate greed. They must rebuild governance models reflecting their unique histories and values. The weapon markets, cultural exports, and economic dependencies sustaining American hegemony must be challenged. Only then can we foster a world where diverse philosophies and indigenous wisdom are valued, where nature is healed, and where humanity is united by respect for the planet and each other.

The United States’ projection of democracy is a mirage masking exploitation, colonialism, and environmental destruction. Its deep state orchestrates a global puppet show, eroding the diversity and harmony of indigenous systems. The wars, cultural exports, and economic dependencies it fosters are tools of control, not progress. Humanity must reject this design, heal its divisions, and embrace a future guided by nature and indigenous wisdom. The fall of this unethical state is not just inevitable but essential for a just, sustainable world.

Gopi Shankar Madurai is an intersex activist.

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

TN Muslim Munnetra Kazhagam Executive Abdul Hakeem Arrested By Tamil Nadu Police For Sexually Harassing Women

By
The Commune
-
tmmk abdul hakeem

Tamil Nadu Police have arrested Tamil Nadu Muslim Munnetra Kazhagam (TMMK) executive for Sexual Harassment of Woman.

Abdul Hakeem, managing director of a company and state treasurer of the economic wing of Tamil Nadu Muslim Munnetra Kazhagam (TMMK), has been arrested for allegedly sexually harassing a woman employed at a private fertilizer manufacturing firm in Ayankovilpattu near Villupuram.

Police investigations indicate that Abdul Hakeem sent inappropriate messages via WhatsApp and is accused of sexually harassing over ten women.

(With Inputs From Polimer News)

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“Lord Rama Lost His Mind After Losing Sita, Not Guilty Under IPC 84, Kamban Saved Him”, Says Sexual Harassment Accused Vairamuthu Who Also Derogated Andal

By
The Commune
-
lord rama kamban vairamuthu ipc

On 6 August 2025, we reported that sexual harassment accused Vairamuthu was going to be awarded the Kavi Chakravarthy Kamban Award by DMK MP Jagathrakshakan’s Azhwar Research Centre.

Speaking at the Chennai Kamban Kazhagam event during the organisation’s 51st year celebrations, Vairamuthu stirred controversy yet again by speaking extensively on how the Tamil epic Kamba Ramayanam reshaped the portrayal of Lord Rama, offering a literary redemption for the deity in contrast to earlier depictions in Valmiki’s Ramayana – how he did this was through his interpretation of Lord Rama’s actions in the Ramayana, drawing parallels between the Vali episode and the legal defence for acts committed by persons of unsound mind under Section 84 of the Indian Penal Code.

Vairamuthu approached the topic by saying, “I had a desire for fame. It was only after I became famous that I realized why this fame is an unwanted desire. When you think you want fame, you have to prepare yourself for slander and humiliation. Defamation and slander are the remains of fame. Only if you are ready to accept these remains of fame can you desire fame. There is no such thing as fame alone. Do you know what that fame does to you? It lulls you to sleep. Sometimes sleep itself becomes intoxicating and kills you. That is what happens. When that fame comes, slander comes.”

Then he jumped on to Kamban. He said, “The one who wiped out this slander is Kamban. The one who wiped out the slander that happened to Rama. Kamban. Do you know why he wrote the poems? That is the reason he writes poems. I am taking this epic and writing it. A poet inserts a head, ears, eyes, into the poem but inserts the words into the heart. What crime did he commit or was committed against him? They asked Variyar, what crime was committed against him? He was born in the Raghu dynasty. Rama should have called him Rama Surya. Why did they call him Ramachandra? Rama Surya is the Raghu dynasty. Why did they call him Ramachandra? Variyar said that he was the one who would kill Vali from hiding and bear the consequences. He was called Ramachandra. Surya has no shame, Chandra has shame. Rama was shamed. So he was called by comparing him to Chandra, said Variyar. Variyar failed to forgive Rama’s crime and shame. Variyar is not ready to forgive. Valmiki did not forgive him either. Every question Valmiki’s Vali asks is like shooting an arrow from the front and it coming out from the back. He asks, “What kind of a royal family are you from? You are not from a royal family. You are a sinner disguised as an ascetic. Who is saying this? Valmiki’s Vali looks at Rama and says, “You are a sinner disguised as an ascetic. An old well covered with grass, if I step on it thinking it is grass, I will die. I will drown. I will be destroyed. You are that well.

He further continues, “The next question he asks is, “Why did you kill me? I am from the monkey family. The sages will not use my skin. And the ascetics will not eat my flesh. Then why are you trying to kill me?” All these questions are not in Kamba Ramayanam. It is in Valmiki Ramayanam. Both Valmiki and Vali are not ready to forgive. After seeing that sword/arrow has entered his body, every word Vali speaks seems like an unforgivable punishment, but Kamban saves Rama, comrades. That is where we realise how much importance was given to poets like us. He says, “You have made a mistake. What mistake have you found in me?” Vali asks, “What wrong have you found in me?” Then he asks, “You did one thing in your country. You did another thing in the forest. You gave your kingdom to your brother in your country. You gave my kingdom to my brother in the forest. Oh, you sinner, you have done two different things. You gave the kingdom that you should rule, to your brother. You gave the kingdom that I should rule, to my brother. How have you done this? But it’s okay, that’s where you changed your mind.”

Then Vairamuthu explains the verses. He says, “If you see the strength, beauty, extension, depth that can be found in this word, you should pay close attention to it. The action, like a bewilderment, is what this bewilderment means. I have seen that the word is the most powerful thing in the world. The word is, not people, not the constitution, not the government, not power, not money, but the word is most powerful. Because this word I have been using this word for 5 thousand years, and it will be ruled for another 50 thousand years. This word does not belong to me. I am completely accepting it. Do you know how much I take a word that does not belong to me? I take that much. The speed of the word is faster than the speed of the light. It takes eight minutes and 20 seconds for the first ray from the sun to touch this earth. The sun’s ray does the work it should do in eight minutes and 20 seconds, but for the earth and the sky. If a poet writes, he touches the sun and returns to the ground in two words. The word is faster than the sun. He said that word. He acted in bewilderment. What is bewilderment? Bewilderment means awe. Another word is bewitchment. This is the word. Beauty is bewitchment. The mind is bewitched. Rama, who separated from Sita, lost his mind.”

This is where he makes even more derogatory interpretations. Vairamuthu explains the Tamil poet Kamban’s Kambaramayanam, saying Kamban “saved Rama” by portraying him as having lost mental clarity after being separated from Sita. This, he claimed, was akin to the IPC’s provision that a person of unsound mind cannot be held criminally liable. He says, “ The crime committed by a person who has lost his mind is not a crime. The Indian Penal Code Section 84 of the Indian Penal Code says that a person who has lost his mind due to a mental disorder cannot be held guilty of an act committed by him. The message of Section 84 of the Indian Penal Code is that whether Kamban knows this or not, he does not know the law. He knows society, he knows psychology. With this forgiveness, a criminal named Rama is also freed. He forgives Rama and makes Rama a human being. Rama becomes a human being at that place, while Kamban becomes a god. The character is a human being; the creator is God. This is the difference between a character and a poet.”

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“There Will Be Bloodbath”: Senior DMK Leader RS Bharathi’s Son Calls For “Civil Movement” After “Defeating BJP”

By
The Commune
-

In a provocative and inflammatory social media post, Sai Lakshmikanth Bharathi, son of senior DMK leader and Organizing Secretary RS Bharathi, sparked outrage by suggesting that defeating the BJP through electoral means was difficult due to its current popularity, and that the only alternative was to mobilize the public in a “civil movement” — a move he warned would lead to a “bloodbath.”

The remark stirred controversy, as it sharply contradicted the DMK’s frequent claims of upholding constitutional and democratic processes. Critics argued that the statement exposed a willingness to resort to dangerous and undemocratic tactics when electoral victory seemed uncertain.

Posting from his official X account, Sai Lakshmikanth Bharathi wrote,
“Defeat of BJP electorally is removing a crucial card from the house of cards. What transpires after BJP’s fall will be an avalanche. The stakes are high. The stakeholders wont let it happen. Only way is to go to the people and make it a civil movement. There will be bloodbath.”

It remains unclear whether he was referring to the Bihar elections expected in November 2025 or the 2026 Tamil Nadu Assembly polls. However, the overt hint at violent consequences drew widespread condemnation across social media platforms.

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

VCK, Communists & NTK Backtrack After Valliyur ‘Honour Killing’ Claim Falls Apart As Arrested Men Belong To Same Caste

By
The Commune
-
valliyur murder

It appears that left-leaning parties in Tamil Nadu often choose simple political posturing over addressing the serious issue of caste-based violent killings, particularly in cases such as honor killings. Recently, parties like the Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi (VCK), Communist factions, and the Naam Tamilar Katchi created an uproar, claiming a murder in Valliyur, Tirunelveli was an honour killing. However, when investigations revealed that the killing involved individuals from the same caste and was rooted in a personal rivalry, these parties quickly withdrew their protests, abandoning the issue.

This comes at the backdrop of similar case unfolded earlier in Tirunelveli, where a young man named Kavin was brutally murdered for loving a woman from a different caste. This case generated widespread outrage and support. Leaders from Kavin’s community presented clear demands and cooperated with the government to ensure justice. Only after these demands were met did Kavin’s family receive his body, while social media was filled with condemnations of the honor killing.

In contrast, the murder case in Valliyur brought to light a different kind of complexity in its background. The victim, Prabhudas, a 27-year-old contractor from Thanganer village in the Sanganeri panchayat near Radhapuram, Tirunelveli district, was found dead by the roadside after going missing for two days. His friend, Tamilarasan, who was with him during the incident, was found unconscious and later hospitalized. Initial police investigations suggested an accident, but Tamilarasan’s recovered testimony confirmed that Prabhudas was hacked to death by a gang.

Members of the Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi and Naam Tamilar Party clashed with police, claiming Prabhudas was an honor killing victim from their caste. They blocked roads and demanded justice, accusing certain groups of plotting to suppress their community’s progress. Prabhudas’s grieving parents joined protests, lamenting the loss and demanding accountability.

The police arrested four individuals Vinoth, Lingusamy, Maharajan from Kudankulam, and Arunkumar from Thisayanvilai in connection with the murder. Crucially, all arrested belonged to Prabhudas’s own caste.  According to police, the victim, Prabhudas, was murdered out of vengeance. The killers’ motive stemmed from a previous relationship between Prabhudas and a woman who had allegedly taken her own life after he threatened her with compromising photos. The perpetrators killed him after learning that he is currently engaged to someone else. The assailants were relatives of the woman and harbored enmity over her death and marriage arrangements. The investigation made clear that this was not an honor killing in the traditional caste-oppression sense but a murder arising from personal rivalry within the same caste.

Upon this revelation, political parties that initially protested quietly withdrew, raising questions about their genuine commitment to combating caste violence. The incident underscores the complex realities of caste in society: while some seek justice and equality, others may exploit caste identity for political gain or personal vendettas.

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“IAS Officers Running Parallel Govt”, Madras High Court Slams TN Govt U-Turn On Tamil Scholar Housing Scheme “Kanavu Illam”

By
The Commune
-
Madras High Court Rules Service Registers Of Public Servants Not Fully Exempt From RTI Disclosure ias officers kanavu illam

On 8 August 2025, the Madras High Court raised concerns about whether IAS officers are effectively running a parallel government in Tamil Nadu, expressing disappointment over the state government’s sudden reversal on its promise to allot houses to selected Tamil scholars under the ‘Kanavu Illam Scheme,’ as previously assured to the court.

Justice N. Anand Venkatesh observed that such decisions appeared to be driven by bureaucrats who failed to grasp the cultural and emotional value of the scheme. He added that former Chief Minister M. Karunanidhi would never have permitted such a move. The observations were made while hearing a petition filed by lyricist R. Vairamuthu, who challenged the cancellation of a house allotment granted to him under the scheme.

During the hearing, senior advocate Xavier Arulraj pointed out that in an earlier case filed by Tamil Nadu’s first woman IPS officer, Thilagavathy, the Advocate-General had assured the court that new restrictions in the scheme would apply prospectively, ensuring that all 10 pre-selected beneficiaries would still receive their houses. Instead of honouring this assurance, the state filed an appeal, and a division bench stayed the interim order of the single judge, he said.

Justice Anand Venkatesh remarked that such actions were typical of IAS officers who “run a parallel government” and treat sensitive cultural matters like allotting houses to eminent writers without emotional understanding, relying only on bureaucratic authority. He cautioned that allowing IAS and IPS officers to effectively run the state could lead to serious governance issues.

When the court resumed in the afternoon, Additional Advocate General J. Ravindran took strong exception to the judge’s remarks, stating that Tamil Nadu is governed by Chief Minister M. K. Stalin and not by bureaucrats.

(With inputs from Times Of India)

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

1...411412413...1,941Page 412 of 1,941
TheCommune
The Commune is a news and views portal focusing on social and political issues of the southern part of India with a focus on Tamil Nadu.
Contact us: thecommune.news@gmail.com
Facebook Instagram X Youtube

NATIONAL NEWS

How BBC's Soutik Biswas Whitewashes Mughals And Demonises Hindus

How BBC’s Soutik Biswas Whitewashes Mughals And Demonises Hindus

The Commune - 0
Soutik Biswas, the BBC's India correspondent, has been exposed as a peddler of selective history and anti-Hindu propaganda, masquerading as a neutral journalist.From whitewashing...
© The Commune 2025. All Rights Reserved.