In a striking display of misplaced priorities, Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M.K. Stalin chose to weigh in on the Israel–Iran conflict this week, posting a statement on X condemning Israel’s recent strikes on Iran. His tweet described the act as “reckless aggression,” drawing immediate criticism from political observers who questioned whether a state chief minister should be commenting on international military affairs—particularly at a time when his own backyard is on fire.
Israel’s strikes on Iran is a reckless act of aggression that risks igniting a wider war. Coupled with the continued bombardment of #Gaza and suffering of Palestinian civilians, this violent path must be condemned.
The world must push for restraint, justice, and meaningful…
— M.K.Stalin (@mkstalin) June 14, 2025
Over the past few months, Tamil Nadu has witnessed a disturbing rise in crime, worsening drug menace and law-and-order failures. From targeted killings to increasing gang activity and political violence, citizens across the state are voicing alarm over the deteriorating situation. Yet, instead of addressing these urgent issues, Stalin appears more focused on international events far removed from his administrative mandate.
Stalin’s post was not a genuine concern for geopolitics but a calculated move to appease a section of his voter base—namely the Muslim community—by publicly criticizing Israel, a country often vilified by Islamist political groups.
Under India’s Constitution, foreign policy is strictly a Union subject, and state leaders have no authority or role in diplomatic affairs. By stepping into this space, Stalin not only undermines constitutional boundaries but also signals a dangerous trend of identity-based posturing taking precedence over governance.
Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.
