Home Blog Page 308

Dharmasthala ‘Mass Burial’ Allegations By ‘Masked Man’ Collapse: SIT Finds No Evidence

dharmasthala mass burial grave nhrc sit mass burial masked man soujanya murder case

The controversy surrounding allegations of “mass burials” of women and minor girls at the Lord Manjunatha shrine in Dharmasthala has taken a dramatic turn after the Special Investigation Team (SIT) formed by the Karnataka government failed to recover any remains supporting the claims.

The case originated on 3 June 2025, when an unidentified complainant, who appeared in public fully covered to conceal his identity and came to be known as the “masked man,” claimed to be a former sanitation worker at the shrine. He alleged that he had been forced to bury large numbers of women and minor girls between 1995 and 2014, who were allegedly raped and murdered. He submitted skeletal remains in court which he claimed to have exhumed from one of the sites and later testified before a court in the same concealed manner.

Following his complaint, another woman lodged a case stating that her daughter had gone missing during a trip to Dharmasthala.

Given the seriousness of the charges, the state government formed an SIT on 19 July 2025 to investigate. The “masked man” pointed investigators to 13 alleged burial sites. Excavations were carried out at 17 sites in total, but the case began unraveling as the SIT found no evidence of mass burials.

At one location, bone fragments recovered were determined by forensic experts to belong to a male. At another site, identity cards recovered belonged to a man who reportedly died of illness. The skull handed over to the court by the complainant was tested in two hospitals, both confirming it was that of a male who died about 30 years ago.

Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) was later deployed at the request of the complainant. At site number 13, where he had claimed 60–100 bodies were buried at a depth of 16 feet, the radar showed no anomalies and excavation produced no findings.

During digging at site number 11, the complainant abruptly claimed that the actual burial spot was about 150 metres away. At that new location, investigators recovered 81 bones lying on the surface rather than buried. Experts said these too appeared to be from a male. Male clothing and a red saree were found, along with indications that the site may have been connected to a suicide. Excavation there also yielded nothing further.

As the SIT continued to find no corroboration, officials announced they would not excavate every site identified by the “masked man,” but would check a few more, including a location flagged by another complainant who claimed to have witnessed the burial of a 13-year-old girl.

So far, the SIT has registered cases of unnatural death in connection with skeletal remains recovered at two sites and is also investigating the missing girl complaint filed by the mother of Ananya Bhat.

The collapse of the allegations has sparked political confrontation. Devotees staged protests demanding action against those who spread what they called false charges to defame the temple. The state government has assured action against what it described as propaganda.

Deputy Chief Minister D. K. Shivakumar stated that the ongoing investigation would expose what he termed a conspiracy to tarnish the temple’s reputation. He added that strict action would follow if the “mass burial” charges were proven false. Shivakumar accused the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) of politicising the case, saying the party had not spoken when the allegations first surfaced but had later attempted to gain political mileage. He remarked that the BJP acted as though “Hinduism is their private property” and suggested the party was exploiting Dharmasthala for political ends.

The BJP staged a rally on Saturday at the temple, demanding punishment for those behind the allegations. Party leader S. R. Vishwanath said the BJP had initially refrained from commenting because it believed there could have been some truth in the charges. He said the party decided to intervene once excavations disproved claims of mass burials and pledged support to Dharmasthala against what he called false propaganda.

Meanwhile, the “masked man” remains under witness protection. In an interview with India Today, he maintained his allegations, claiming that natural causes or infrastructure activity could have displaced bodies, explaining why excavations yielded nothing.

(With inputs from OpIndia)

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

0% Rajini, 0% Loki, 100% Diarrhea: A Brutally Honest Review/Roast Of Coolie Scam That Will Make Rajini Or Loki Fans Angry

The moment the first look dropped, you could smell what was coming — Coolie was bound to be another glossy, overhyped dud in Rajinikanth’s post-Kabali streak of mediocrity. Rajini fanboys went into a frenzy, flooding timelines with edits and posters, while on the other hand, Lokesh Kanagaraj’s name was tossed around like a magic seal of genius who is making a time travel film part of a meta pan-Indian cinematic universe and what not. But to be frank, Loki is no better than Atlee. Both of them have the skills to elevate a mass hero using their already existing star status.

In my view, Lokesh Kanagaraj has delivered only one truly terrific film — Maanagaram. And that too we’re beginning to wonder if it was really and solely his effort or was it someone else’s because he has not been able to recreate the same magic.

Cinephiles know that Kaithi is just a Tamil rehash of Assault on Precinct 13 that ended up as average at best. And everything that followed — Master, Vikram, Leo — were not just mediocre but simply bad films. Yes, you read that right. Master was nothing but a brainrot version of Kamal’s Nammavar. A History of Violence was butchered and messed up into Leo. Vikram is nothing more than a celluloid on cocaine rush. Once the frenzy wears off, you see it for what it is: just another overhyped star vehicle under Red Giant banner, one that conveniently chauffeured Kamal Haasan straight to the Rajya Sabha. If not for Anirudh’s adrenaline pumping music, all of them would’ve gone down the Cooum.

So, given the track-record of Rajini since 2016 and Loki’s underwhelming filmography, I had the least expectations from Coolie. Rajini is not the Rajini of his heydays. Lokesh is not the best director in K town. So, I wasn’t expecting a cinematic feast.

But is it too much to ask for these so-called best of the best to serve a simple Sambhar Saadham atleast?

As the saying goes, too many cooks spoil the broth. And that’s exactly what happened with Coolie. The promotions and hype packaged it as a grand pan-India spectacle bursting with big names — the cinematic equivalent of walking into a swanky, overhyped five-star restaurant, ordering their “signature spicy special” expecting an explosion of flavours… only to be served a cold, watery donkey’s diarrhea that the waiter — and Rajini fanatics — insist is gourmet.

Let’s call Coolie for what it really is – a hollow spectacle, shallow in substance, a mere façade of a film to launder the ill-gotten wealth of those in power.

But let’s not go there. Let’s stick to the film that has been presented to us. Even as a mass commercial entertainer, it raises more questions than it answers. This isn’t “mass” cinema. This is a shoddy, insincere, stitched-together patchwork of lazy writing, tied together by Rajini’s star persona which now feels more like a crutch than a strength.

Here’s what I want to ask the Rajini fans gushing about Coolie — acting like a Sun Pictures sleeper cell on a mission to brand it a “super duper hit”:

1. If for major part of the film, Rajini is someone who owns a mansion, he’s not a Coolie. He’s a mansion-owner, a businessman. Title e gaali!

2. Why hype up a luxury watch smuggling plot in the first place if you’re going to abandon it completely?

3. There’s another subplot of human organ trafficking and that’s also abandoned. Why even think of subplot when your main plot itself is dangling in the air?

4. How on earth does Sathyaraj jump from being a harbour coolie 30 years ago to suddenly becoming a ‘scientist-inventor’ who creates an electric chair for disposing bodies?

5. If Nagarjuna’s gang can kill people openly in front of thousands, why the hell do they need a secret cremation chair? Since, their business is in the port, wouldn’t the simpler thing to do have been to tie a rock to the body and drop it to the sea for fishes to eat?

6. Why on earth does Aamir Khan randomly start shooting people at the end? Wait, why does Aamir Khan even exist in this film?Matlab! Kuchi Bhi!

This is exactly why Aamir should actually read scripts before saying yes. Just because Rajini is in a film doesn’t mean that a serious filmmaker of his stature should stoop to committing to crap masquerading as cinema.

7. Sathyaraj gets killed by Soubin, who’s revealed as undercover police. Rajini, decides the logical thing to do is… continue burning bodies in chair with Shruti Haasan.

8. Rajini is brother-in-law of Satyaraj. Satyaraj disapproves of Rajni’s drinking habits. Rajini enforces a no-drinking rule in his mansion. Since Satyaraj is killed, Rajini takes this as a symbolic “permission” to drink Powerhouse again? Enna karumam da idhu!

9. Why is Rajini hiding coolies like Pokémon in a mansion?

10. How was Soubin caught by Nagarjuna as an undercover cop? How a Coolie like Rajini was so powerful? What’s the need to show Rajini cutting mutton in the beginning? How can a son of a smuggler and criminal become a customs official? Wouldn’t IRS not conduct a background check? We can keep going on and on but mudila!

Fine. You want to blow your money on a worthless script — your money, your choice, your stars. But why on earth drag a masterpiece like Breaking Bad into your trash fire? From ripping off the ‘I’m the Danger’ phrase, to shoving in the ‘Say My Name, You’re Goddamn Right’ line in Powerhouse song, to showing Mahesh Manjrekar like Hector Salamanca—except written by a Sun TV serial writer. This crime can never be forgiven. I think Vince Gilligan should sue everybody – Lokesh, Rajini, Sun Pictures for not just copyright infringement but for trampling his stellar work in the name of ‘inspiration’.

Now for the larger questions:

1. Considering you’ve locked Rajini into doing X number of films for you as part of a ‘deal’, and you claim you want to deliver Kollywood’s first ₹1000-crore blockbuster, who at Sun Pictures looked at this donkey’s diarrhea of a script and thought, ‘Yes, we hit the jackpot’.

2. In the pre-release interviews, Lokesh is described as a master story teller who is fabulous at narration. What did he narrate? How did he narrate? What story did he narrate?

3. For how long and how many more directors will keep milking Rajini’s stardom—rehashing stale nostalgia in songs and scenes, and dressing up a lazily written, poorly made fan-service vehicle as a ‘Superstar miracle’ for the blinded brigade to hail?

4. And how long will Rajini fans keep propping up every mediocre mess their demigod churns out—glorifying it as a ‘pure Rajini film’ or hailing it as some grand ‘Thalaivar Sambavam’?

And to the Rajini fans who’ll come charging at me for saying this—calm down. You can scream ‘Look at his style, bro! Look at his laugh, bro! Look at his mass, bro! The man is still mesmerizing at this age bro’ all you want, but don’t expect every average moviegoer to chant along when the film itself is trash. We’ll happily cheer all that if he at least stars in a halfway decent commercial entertainer. I’m not even asking your Thalaivar to give us another Baasha. Just give us something like Sivaji, Chandramukhi… hell, I’d even settle for a Lingaa.

Final Thoughts

Telugu cinema gave the world RRR, a global sensation. Pushpa and Baahubali organically became pan-India blockbusters. Kannada cinema stunned with KGF, Kantara, and now Hombale is creating a cinematic universe with Vishnu’s Dashavataram with the animated film Mahavataram Narasimha becoming a runaway hit and doing big business across India.

And what does Tamil cinema have to show? An endless parade of zombies screaming “Rajini, Rajini, Rajini” or “Vijay, Vijay, Vijay,”.

The harsh truth is this: Tamil cinema, once a trailblazer of pan-India hits, has not been able to produce even one oflate because its biggest stars and directors are trapped in the cycle of churning out mindless fan-service for Rajini, Kamal, Vijay, or Ajith, instead of daring to create stories with vision and universal appeal.

The industry keeps feeding this cult of stardom, and the zombies keep lapping up every bit of garbage as long as it has their idol’s sticker on it. The moment someone points out the rot, it’s instantly brushed off as ‘hate’ or rival fan noise. And so Tamil cinema stays stuck in this toxic loop—stars too scared to take risks, fans too blind to accept flaws—while other film industries march ahead with stories that are conquering the world.

Kaushik is a writer and filmbuff.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Did You Know? DMK MP TR Baalu Has Openly Accepted That He Has Two Wives

The DMK has long projected itself as a progressive force claiming to have “broken the shackles of patriarchy” under the guidance of its ideological forefather, E.V. Ramasamy Naicker. However, the reality appears far from this self-congratulatory narrative. Practices like bigamy and polygamy continue to thrive within the party’s ranks a glaring contradiction to their rhetoric of women’s liberation.

A prime example is senior leader, party treasurer and DMK MP TR Baalu. Baalu is married to both Renuka Devi, his long-time partner, and Porkodi, his niece. Together, they have five children three sons and two daughters.

The issue of Baalu’s dual marriages came under public scrutiny as far back as 2004, during his candidacy for the South Chennai Lok Sabha constituency. S. Purushothaman, an independent candidate, filed a complaint with the Election Commission, alleging that Baalu had violated provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act and the Indian Penal Code by listing two spouses T.R.B. Porkodi and B.R. Renukadevi in his election affidavit. He demanded Baalu’s disqualification. During scrutiny, Karate Thiagarajan, then Chennai’s Deputy Mayor and AIADMK member, also objected to Baalu’s nomination based on this revelation. Yet, the returning officer dismissed the objections and cleared Baalu’s candidature.

Despite the controversy, Baalu has consistently listed both wives in his election affidavits across multiple years, including 2009 and 2024. His financial disclosures not only confirm the existence of two spouses but also detail shared ownership of assets, including:

In 2009, he declared assets worth ₹7.69 crore, distributed among himself and both wives. In 2014, he declared 20.15 Crores.

By 2024, the declared assets had risen to ₹17.40 crore, including movable assets worth ₹1.08 crore and immovable property valued at ₹16.31 crore. His 2024 affidavit showed his asserts with both his wives.

While government employees and even local body election candidates are disqualified for minor technicalities, a sitting MP who openly practices bigamy faces no consequence. The DMK continues to uphold its “rationalist” image, loudly praising EVR’s legacy for liberating women, yet permits and even promotes leaders who violate basic tenets of gender justice.

Baalu, now 82 and DMK MP from Sriperumbudur, remains one of DMK’s most senior and influential figures. The party has never addressed the contradiction between its stated ideology and the personal lives of its top brass a silence that exposes the hollowness of its commitment to women’s equality.

In truth, the DMK’s glorification of EVR’s social reforms rings hollow when its own senior-most leaders live in open contradiction to those very ideals. The gap between ideology and practice is no longer a crack – it’s a chasm.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“All This Blunder Happened In Only One Booth, Complete Mess Created By Returning Officer”, Says Supreme Court Overturning Haryana Panchayat Result After Recount

"Let The Past Not Haunt The Future": Supreme Court To Hear Challenges To Places Of Worship Act supreme court allahabad high court panchayat recount vantara waqf amendment posh babri masjid facebook post

In a rare step, the Supreme Court has overturned the results of a Gram Panchayat election in Haryana after summoning Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) to itself and directing a recount of votes by its Registrar.

Upon recounting, the ‘defeated’ candidate, Mohit Kumar, was found to have polled 51 more votes than Kuldeep Singh, who had been declared elected earlier. Directing immediate corrective action, the Bench ordered the Deputy Commissioner-cum-Election Officer, Panipat, to issue a notification within two days declaring Kumar as the elected Sarpanch of Buana Lakhu village.

“The petitioner shall be entitled to assume the said office forthwith and perform his duties,” the Court said.

Court Accepts Registrar’s Report

The Bench of Justices Surya Kant, Dipankar Datta and N Kotiswar Singh relied on the recount conducted under court supervision.

“…there being prima facie no reason to doubt the Report submitted by the OSD (Registrar) of this Court, especially when the entire recounting has been duly videographed and its result is signed by the representatives of the parties, we are satisfied that the appellant deserves to be declared as the elected Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Buana Lakhu Village, District Panipat, Haryana in the election held on 22.11.2022,” the judges said.

During the hearing, Justice Kant clarified that the earlier declared candidate, Kuldeep Singh, was not responsible for the wrong result. “All this blunder happened in only 1 booth…complete mess created by Returning Officer/the Counting Officer, it is he who committed a blunder…in these kind of matters, the only solution is, you go for recount…never thought that High Court will write 15 pages to deny recount!” the judge observed.

From Village to Supreme Court

The election was held in November 2022. Initially, Kuldeep Singh was declared elected. On the same day, however, the Returning Officer ordered a recount after spotting an error in the result prepared at one booth. Following this correction, Mohit Kumar was declared the winner.

Kuldeep Singh then approached the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which set aside Kumar’s election, holding that results once declared cannot be altered by a suo motu recount. The High Court restored Singh as Sarpanch and said that the proper course was to file an election petition.

Mohit Kumar subsequently filed such a petition, which Singh contested on the ground of limitation. The matter ultimately reached the Supreme Court, which rejected Singh’s objection and directed the Election Tribunal to decide the case within four months.

In April 2024, the Tribunal found grounds to recount votes at Booth No. 69, but its order was again set aside by the High Court on Singh’s appeal. Kumar then approached the Supreme Court once more.

Recount Under SC’s Watch

In July, the apex court ordered that all EVMs be produced before a nominated Registrar, who was tasked with recounting votes from all five booths under videography and in the presence of party representatives.

The Registrar’s report, submitted on August 6, showed Mohit Kumar ahead by 51 votes. Accepting the findings, the Supreme Court on August 11 reversed the High Court order and declared Kumar the duly elected Sarpanch.

Subject to Tribunal’s Final Judgment

The Bench, however, clarified that while the aspect of recounting was now settled, other issues raised by Singh could still be agitated before the Election Tribunal.

It made clear that “on the aspect of recounting of votes, the Tribunal shall accept the report of the Supreme Court’s Registrar as final and conclusive.” Kumar’s declaration as Sarpanch, the judges said, would remain subject to the Tribunal’s final decision.

Statement By Winner

The winner Mohit Kumar, speaking to news personnel said, “EVMs are not at fault, if any miscount happens, it is likely due to the greed of the counting officer. Otherwise, it is not likely to happen.”

 (With inputs from Live Law)

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Annamalai Exposes DMK’s Drama: DMK Functionary ‘Kozhi Rajan’ Accused Of Rowdyism And Embezzling Funds Meant For Church Is The Spouse Of ‘Ph.D Student’ Jean Joseph Who Created Scene At Convocation Event

kozhi rajan annamalai dmk

BJP leader K. Annamalai has launched a sharp attack on the ruling DMK, accusing the party of consistently shielding and empowering anti-social elements for political and financial gain. According to Annamalai, the DMK has a long-standing pattern of recruiting individuals with criminal backgrounds, rewarding them with positions of influence, and turning a blind eye to their escalating misconduct as long as they continue to deliver money or political advantage.

The BJP leader’s criticism comes in the wake of a fresh controversy involving Rajan, the joint secretary of DMK’s Nagercoil city unit. Widely known among locals as “Kozhi Rajan” or “Dhadiyan Rajan,” he was recently caught on camera when his wife who studied at Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, virtue-signalled by refusing to take the degree certificate from Tamil Nadu Governor RN Ravi. However, Annamalai and others allege the performance was nothing more than a political smokescreen an attempt to divert attention from a string of serious criminal allegations that have trailed her husband and DMK functionary Rajan for years.

Locals in Nagercoil have long accused Rajan of misappropriating approximately ₹1.5 crore allocated by the Tamil Nadu government for renovation works at the historic St. Xavier’s Church. They claim the funds were used to purchase assets including properties and an Innova car under his wife’s name. Yet, repeated attempts to obtain transparency via RTI queries have been stonewalled. Even a formal complaint lodged with the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption has reportedly gone nowhere.

Residents of Bharathar South village in Kottar have also submitted complaints to both the District Collector and the Superintendent of Police, accusing Rajan of issuing death threats to dissenters and creating a public nuisance near schools while intoxicated disturbing students and intimidating locals. Despite this, no legal action has been taken against him, which Annamalai attributes solely to Rajan’s political affiliation with the DMK.

Taking to his official X account, Annamalai wrote, “The history of the DMK party is one of seeking out individuals involved in petty crimes, giving them positions of power, and then turning a blind eye when they commit more serious offenses by solely focusing on the income they generate. Due to this only the ordinary public suffers. Just two days ago, a man named Rajan, the joint secretary of the Nagercoil DMK unit, was caught on camera creating a scene at Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, feigning criticism of the Governor. This same individual was known to the people of Nagercoil as “Kozhi Rajan” or “Dhadiyan Rajan” for many years and has a long history of criminal allegations against him. The people of Nagercoil have complained that this “Kozhi Rajan” embezzled about 1.5 crore rupees allocated by the government to the famous St. Xavier’s Church in Nagercoil and claimed he used the money to acquire several properties and an Innova car in his wife’s name. When questioned about the funds through the Right to Information Act, authorities refused to answer. Even when a complaint filed against him with the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption also appears to have been shelved. In addition to this, the residents of Kottar’s Bharathar South village in Nagercoil have already filed complaints with the District Collector and the Superintendent of Police regarding “Kozhi Rajan’s” actions, which include threatening to kill opposers and causing disturbance near schools while drunk, bothering students. However, the DMK government has not taken any action against “Kozhi Rajan” to date. The only reason for this is that he belongs to the DMK. It is believed that “Kozhi Rajan” staged the scene at the university to divert attention from the public’s complaints against him. The Tamil Nadu government allocated ₹2.28 crore for the renovation of St. Xavier’s Church in Kottar and has already released ₹1.14 crore in the first phase. Why do they refuse to make the accounts of these funds public? Why is the district police hesitant to take action against “Kozhi Rajan,” who continues to threaten the public? The public will soon teach a lesson to the DMK that continues to protect, empower, and promote anti-social elements.”

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Trump, Putin Report ‘Progress’ at Alaska Summit But No Ukraine Ceasefire Announcement Yet

trump putin meet alaska ukraine ceasefire

Presidents Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin said that they made progress in three hours of talks on Friday, moving closer to finding an end to the Ukraine War, but did not announce an immediate ceasefire.

“It’s not a done deal at all”, he told a Fox News interviewer after Friday’s summit in Alaska. “And Ukraine has to agree. President (Volodymyr) Zelensky has to agree.” “We had a very good meeting today, and I think a lot of points were negotiated on behalf of Ukraine”, he said.

Before the summit, he said that he would not be negotiating on behalf of Ukraine and that the meeting was a sounding board aimed at facilitating a direct meeting between Presidents Putin and Zelensky.

“Now it’s really up to President Zelensky to get it done”, President Trump said of a peace deal. “We have a pretty good chance of getting it done”, he added. “They’re going to set up a meeting now, between President Zelensky and President Putin and myself, I guess”, he said.

President Trump had said that he could call an immediate meeting between Presidents Putin and Zelensky if the discussion went his way. At the end of the news conference, he told Putin, “We’ll speak to you very soon, and probably see you again very soon”. President Putin chirped up, “Next time in Moscow.”

President Trump saying that “it’s not a done deal” amounted to an admission that he did not get the immediate ceasefire he had insisted on. At the same time, the fact that he had not terminated the negotiations within minutes and walked away, as he had threatened earlier, could be a sign of a breakthrough.

Nor did he announce the “very severe consequences” he had threatened if Putin did not agree to peace. At the news conference after their talks concluded, Putin was upbeat.

“I would like to hope that the agreement that we’ve reached together will help us bring closer that goal (of finding a solution) and will pave the path towards peace in Ukraine”, he said. “I have every reason to believe that, moving along this path, we can reach the end of the conflict in Ukraine sooner rather than later”, he added. “I believe we had a very productive meeting”, Trump said.

“There were many, many points that we agreed on.” President Trump said cryptically there were “a couple of big ones that we haven’t quite gotten there, but we’ve made some headway”. “One is probably the most significant, but we have a very good chance of getting there. We didn’t get there, but we have a very good chance of getting there”, he added.

Fox News interviewer Sean Hannity pressed President Trump about the differences they had. He said that he would rather not talk about it, but added, “I guess somebody is going to go public with it. They’ll figure it out. But no, I don’t want to do that. I want to see if we can get it done.” The main points of difference going into the talks were: Land swap or re-drawing of borders that would give Russia some Ukrainian territories, and a security guarantee from Europeans and the US for Ukraine. Trump has spoken of a land swap, which would be politically hard for Zelensky.

British Defence Secretary said on Friday that the United Kingdom and its allies are ready to put troops in Ukraine to guarantee its security if there is a ceasefire. Trump also spoke in support of troops to guarantee security but ruled out their going under the NATO banner.

Putin may have conceded the security guarantee issue as he said, “Naturally, the security of Ukraine should be true. Naturally we’re prepared to overcome that.” Trump said that he would be calling his Western allies and Zelensky to brief them on the summit. He will have to convince the Europeans and Zelensky, who were sceptical about the summit but were willing to give it a chance that there had been progress.

The summit was truncated and only one of the planned phases – a meeting with key officials, Trump’s Special Envoy Steve Witkoff and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Putin’s foreign policy aide Yuri Ushakov, Defence Minister Andrei Belousov, and Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov — was held. Instead of the first phase, a private meeting between them, Trump and Putin spoke directly as they walked down the red carpet and continued the conversation in Trump’s limousine.

They started the talks with officials and called off the planned third phase, which was to have been a luncheon with more officials, especially those dealing with trade and investment. Putin had said he wanted to expand the talks to include Nuclear arms control, and Ushakov suggested trade and economic cooperation. Russia’s Finance Minister Anton Siluanov, and Special Presidential Representative for Investment Kirill Dmitriev, and US Secretaries Pete Hegseth of Defence, Scott Bessent of Treasury, and Howard Lutnick of Commerce were on standby.

The third phase in which the topics were expected to be discussed, did not take place. At the news conference, Putin made he pitch for trade, which now pre-occupies Trump “It is clear that the US and Russian investment and business cooperation has tremendous potential”, he said. “Russia and the US can offer each other so much in trade, digital and high tech, and in space exploration”, he said.

“Today’s agreements will be the starting point, not only for the solution of the Ukrainian issue, but also will help us bring back business-like and pragmatic relations between Russia and US”, Putin said. He asserted that trade between the US and Russia had grown 20 per cent under Trump, who has threatend to penalise India with a 25 per cent tariff for buying oil from Russia.

The summit began with a choreographed welcome as the US Air Force 1 and Russia’s presidential aircraft landed almost simultaneously. Trump clapped as Putin walked toward him on the red carpet. They smiled and shook hands as four F-35s and a B-2 Spirit bomber flew overhead.

-IANS

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

US May Not Impose Additional 25% Tariffs On India Over Russian Oil, Hints Trump

russian oil trump tariffs india

The Donald Trump administration may not impose secondary tariffs on India over purchasing Russian energy, as the US President said that Russia has already lost a key oil client.

Speaking to Fox News aboard Air Force One en route to Alaska, Trump said the US may not impose secondary tariffs on countries continuing to buy Russian crude oil.

“Well, he (Vladimir Putin) lost an oil client, so to speak, which is India, which was doing about 40 per cent of the oil. China, as you know, is doing a lot…,” said Trump.

“And if I did what’s called a secondary sanction, or a secondary tariff, it would be very devastating from their standpoint. If I have to do it, I’ll do it. Maybe I won’t have to do it,” he added. The secondary 25 per cent tariffs on India are likely to come into effect from August 27.

Earlier this week, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said if “things don’t go well” between Trump and Putin at the Alaska summit, then secondary sanctions on India for purchasing Russian oil could go higher. Meanwhile, the government has already said the targeting of India is unjustified and unreasonable.

“Like any major economy, India will take all necessary measures to safeguard its national interests and economic security,” it said. The fact is that India has sharply increased its purchases of oil and gas from America.

This, in turn, has led to a reduction in India’s trade surplus with the US, which is a major aim of the Trump administration’s trade policy. Official figures show that India’s oil and gas imports from the US have jumped by as much as 51 per cent from January to June this year.

The country’s liquefied natural gas (LNG) imports from the US nearly doubled to $2.46 billion in the financial year 2024-25 from $1.41 billion in 2023-24. Prime Minister Narendra Modi had assured in February that India would increase energy imports from the US to $25 billion in 2025 from $15 billion in 2024 to help reduce the trade deficit of the US.

This was followed by Government-owned Indian oil and gas companies entering into discussions for more long-term energy purchases from the US companies. New Delhi has also made it clear that it was diversifying its sources of energy imports to reduce dependence on Russian oil.

New Delhi has also made it clear that India and the US share a very important strategic relationship that goes beyond trade.

-IANS

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“Mentally Ill, ‘Kaama’-Muthu, Anti-Hindu’: H. Raja Blasts DMK-Supporting Dravidianist Lyricist And Sexual Harassment-Accused Vairamuthu For Derogating Lord Ram

In a scathing attack, senior BJP leader and National Executive Committee Member H. Raja condemned lyricist and #MeToo-accused Vairamuthu for making controversial remarks about Lord Ram during a recent event in Mylapore. The lyricist, speaking on the Tamil epic Kambaramayanam by poet Kamban, claimed that Kamban “saved” Lord Ram by depicting him as having lost mental clarity after being separated from Sita, a state Vairamuthu likened to legal insanity under the Indian Penal Code, which exempts individuals of unsound mind from criminal liability.

The comments sparked widespread outrage among literary scholars, Hindu devotees, and the general public, who viewed the analogy as not only inappropriate but deeply offensive to religious sentiments.

Reacting sharply, H. Raja, at a recent press conference, lambasted Vairamuthu, accusing him of insulting a revered figure enshrined in India’s cultural and constitutional heritage.

Raja said, “Vairamuthu, an evil and anti-social force, has spoken degradingly about our Lord Ram. This is because there is no need to speak respectfully to a person who speaks in such a manner about our Lord Ram, and no one would expect it. The reason is that this entire nation is the land of Ram. I want to tell this mentally ill Vairamuthu something, What is on the first page of the original manuscript of the Constitution, which was handwritten? It is the picture of the noble Lord Ram. The Indian Constitution still has a picture of Lord Ram; we can go to Parliament right now and see it on the table. But this Vairamuthu has called our Lord Ram mentally ill.”

Then Raja reasoned that as the Dravidian stocks have many wives they could not tolerate Lord Ram. He said “I understand why. All of these Dravidian stocks are like this toward Ram because, in ’69 and ’70, who did E.V.R. put a garland of slippers on and march around? A picture of Ram. Why do they have this issue with Ram? You know, the saying about Ram is: one word, one bow, one wife. And their issue is with that ‘one wife.’ If they should have only one wife. For example, in Sriperumbudur, who is the MP? T.R. Baalu. Look at T.R. Baalu’s affidavit from the 2024 election. It lists the assets and PAN card for his first wife and the assets and PAN card for his second wife. It’s a crime. In this country, we are saying that this anomaly should not exist. Because a person of one religion can have four marriages, but for someone from another religion, a second marriage is a crime. This is a disparity that should be removed when the Uniform Civil Code comes.” 

 Raja also reignited the controversy surrounding the #MeToo allegations against Vairamuthu, questioning why the DMK-led Tamil Nadu government has failed to take action. He said, “Who is this Vairamuthu? A ‘Me Too’ accused. Not one or two, but many women respected by society, like Chinmayi and Sripada, have already filed complaints against this Vairamuthu in ‘Me Too’. The current DMK government, a tyrannical, anti-Hindu, evil government, is why an anti-social and evil force like Vairamuthu has not yet been arrested. That does not mean Vairamuthu is not guilty. Therefore, it deeply saddens me that people like  Jagathrakshakan, I ask you, do you have devotion to Perumal?  Jagathrakshakan, you should have objected and said, ‘You shouldn’t speak about our Lord Ram.’ Otherwise, what kind of Vaishnava is he? What kind of devotee of Perumal is he? Therefore, this evil force, Vairamuthu, is an anti-Hindu, anti-social enemy. When he sees women, he becomes mentally ill. So, who is the mentally ill person? Vairamuthu is the mentally ill person. When he sees women, he wants to rape them. Swami Vivekananda said that our culture teaches us to see all women, except for our sisters and mothers, as mothers. But you are Kaamamuthu (Lust-muthu). With so many accusations against you, why hasn’t this lust-filled, evil Vairamuthu been arrested yet by this anti-Hindu, evil Stalin government? It has to be removed. By the end of May ’26, this evil force, Vairamuthu, will be arrested because he spoke about Andal Nachiyar.”

He added, “Just look at how many millions of people he has tormented mentally. I’ll give you an example of what this Vairamuthu did. Four days after Vairamuthu spoke about Andal Nachiyar, a friend of mine from Chennai, Parthasarathy, called me and said, ‘Sir, can you go to Madurai and meet Dr. Vijayalakshmi Navaneethakrishnan? Because she hasn’t eaten for four days. She is refusing to eat because someone spoke this way about her mother, Andal Nachiyar.’ But as she was speaking and lamenting, she said, ‘Our Raja is the one who spoke against this evil force Vairamuthu.’ So, he said, if you go and ask her, she might start eating. ‘She may give up her fast,’ he said. So, I agreed and went.

Then, Dr. Vijayalakshmi Navaneethakrishnan told me, ‘I received my Ph.D. on the life history of Andal Nachiyar. Andal Nachiyar never went to Thiruvarangam.’ She did research on Andal but then said, ‘Andal was a courtesan in Thiruvarangam (Srirangam).’ How depraved is this evil force, this anti-Hindu Vairamuthu? I ask you, would you dare to hurt the beliefs of your Christian faith? Would you hurt Islamic beliefs? How dare you do this to Hindu beliefs? I ask you, how? What a huge injustice. That’s why we say this government has to arrest this anti-Hindu, anti-social element, Vairamuthu. That is the subject.” 

The BJP leader ended his tirade with a grim prediction, declaring, “The next election, we have to overthrow this anti-Hindu Stalin government.”

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

 

Christian Rights Groups Slam Pakistan For Retaining Death Penalty In Blasphemy Cases

pakistan christian blasphemy death penalty

Pakistan Senate’s recent decision to abolish the death penalty for only two crimes has sparked significant debate in the country, with Christian activists and human rights advocates demanding broader reforms, especially regarding the issue of blasphemy laws, a report mentioned on Friday.

Some quarters have called the legislative decision as a step towards modernising Pakistan’s penal system, Greece-based NewsBomb said in a report. Critics, it said, remain sceptical, viewing it as a strategic, calculated effort aimed more at preserving economic advantages than at championing genuine human rights progress.

On July 18, the upper house of Pakistan gave its nod for the Criminal Laws (Amendment) Bill, which replaces capital punishment with life imprisonment and monetary fines for two offences: public spoliation of a woman and aiding the hijacking of an airplane or public vehicle.

However, the bill remains incomplete without Presidential approval, leaving its final status uncertain. Despite this, the bill has sparked criticism, with many questioning the government’s motives behind the legislation and its sincerity in implementing comprehensive human rights reforms. Human rights activists have expressed skepticism over the government’s decision to remove the death penalty for only two crimes while leaving other punishments intact.

The selection nature of the reform seems inconsistent with a genuine commitment to remove capital punishment or resolving broader issues within Pakistan’s justice system. Critics have stressed that, by only focusing on two crimes, the Pakistan government aims to indicate progress to international observers, particularly European trade partners, without confronting the more contentious and deeply rooted issues in the country’s legal framework.

“The timing of the bill’s passage aligns conspicuously with Pakistan’s ongoing efforts to maintain lucrative trade privileges with European countries. The European Union (EU) has, in recent years, increasingly linked trade benefits to adherence to human rights standards. Observers note that this legislative move may be more about preserving economic advantages than instituting meaningful change on the ground,” the report stated.

Blasphemy laws of Pakistan have been criticised internationally. Under these laws, anyone gets the death penalty and other severe punishments for perceived insults against religion. Christian activists, minority groups, and human rights defenders have called on the lawmakers to take a more comprehensive approach as the blasphemy-related offences have not been included in the recent bill, the NewsBomb report detailed. Blasphemy laws have faced criticism over their misuse and fostering a climate of intolerance, where accusations can cause mob violence, extrajudicial killings, and deep social divisions.

The lack of progress in addressing these laws demonstrates Pakistan’s struggle with balancing religious sensitivities, political pressures, and international human rights expectations. Christian activists and minority rights groups have reacted to the Senate’s decision with a mix of frustration and cautious optimism, the report emphasised. Human rights organisations have condemned the Pakistani government’s decision for what they perceive as superficial reforms that are unable to deal with the root causes of injustice.

The persistent existence of capital punishment for numerous offences, along with weak legal protections for minorities reflects a grim picture for the state of human rights in Pakistan. International human rights groups and foreign governments have closely monitored recent legislative decisions taken by Pakistan, according to the report.

Some have welcomed the partial abolition of the death penalty as the step in the right direction, however, others have expressed scepticism about the depth and durability of these reforms. The slow pace in making legal reform, along with continuous abuses and discrimination, has fostered cynicism about the government’s readiness to protect human rights effectively.

-IANS

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Fake App ‘Gharmandir’ Dupes Devotees Using Dwarkadhish Temple’s Name

gharmandir app fake dwarkadhish temple

With Janmashtami celebrations approaching, a fresh case of online fraud in the name of the famed Dwarkadhish Temple has come to light, raising concerns over cybercrime enforcement.

After recent incidents of devotees being duped via fake websites and apps, a suspicious application called “Gharmandir” is now allegedly collecting money from worshippers under the guise of offering religious services at the temple, according to temple officials.

A written complaint has been filed with the police. According to the Dwarkadhish Mandir Devasthan Samiti, the app is soliciting payments of Rs 151, Rs 201, and Rs 301, claiming to provide offerings and other services to Lord Dwarkadhish during the Janmashtami festival.

An Instagram account linked to the app reportedly directs devotees to download it, further legitimising the scam in the eyes of unsuspecting users. Temple manager Himanshu Chauhan clarified on behalf of the Devasthan Samiti that “no such service is available at Jagatmandir” and confirmed that a written complaint has been filed with the Superintendent of Police.

The committee has appealed to devotees to remain vigilant against fake applications and social media accounts operating in the temple’s name.

The Dwarkadhish Temple, also known as Jagatmandir, is one of Hinduism’s most revered pilgrimage sites and holds immense spiritual significance as it is believed to be the kingdom of Lord Krishna, who is worshipped here as the “King of Dwarka.”

Situated on the western coast of Gujarat, the temple is part of the Char Dham Yatra, making it a must-visit for millions of devotees from across India and abroad. Its history spans over 2,500 years, with intricate architecture and rituals that draw lakhs of pilgrims annually.

The revelation has triggered outrage among worshippers, who accuse fraudsters of exploiting people’s faith and question the apparent inaction of the cybercrime police. On Janmashtami, Dwarka attracts lakhs of pilgrims, while crores more participate from afar.

With such vast numbers, devotees warn that scammers could siphon off huge sums if immediate action is not taken. The Devasthan Samiti has reiterated that it can only issue warnings, but many argue that the responsibility now lies with law enforcement.

Devotees have urged the police to proactively register a case, trace the operators of the fake platform, and shut it down before Janmashtami to prevent mass financial and emotional exploitation.

-IANS

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.