Home Blog Page 127

Did DMK Leak Sangeetha’s Divorce Petition To Target TVK Leader Vijay? Ezhilan’s Cryptic X Post Fuels Speculation

Actor Vijay, the founder of Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK), is facing allegations of infidelity and mental cruelty in a divorce petition filed by his wife of 27 years, Sangeetha Sornalingam. While divorces among high-profile figures are not uncommon, the timing and manner in which this sensitive information surfaced have fueled widespread speculation that the ruling Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) orchestrated its public disclosure to undermine Vijay’s burgeoning political career ahead of the 2026 Assembly elections.

The Divorce Petition

The divorce petition, filed under the Special Marriage Act, 1954, in the Chengalpattu Family Court, accuses Vijay of an extramarital affair with an unnamed actress since 2021, along with emotional neglect and desertion. Sangeetha, 48, detailed in her 12-page filing how she discovered the alleged affair in April 2021 and endured years of humiliation before seeking dissolution. The couple, married since August 1999, shares two children. Sangeetha has also filed a subsequent petition for financial support and accommodation.

What started as a private family matter exploded into public discourse on February 27, 2026, when Sun News, a Tamil media outlet, broke the story with a sensational post on X (formerly Twitter). The post, hashtagged #Vijay and #Sangeetha, featured a graphic announcing the divorce filing and quickly garnered over 31,900 views. Translated from Tamil, it read: “#WATCH | Vijay’s wife Sangeetha files for divorce in Chennai family court.”. This rapid dissemination raised eyebrows, as court documents are typically confidential until hearings progress.

Evidence Pointing to DMK’s Hand

Social media users and TVK supporters have unearthed a timeline that suggests premeditation. The petition was originally filed on December 3, 2025, and transferred to the family court on February 24, 2026. Yet, on February 23—a day before the transfer—DMK MLA Dr. Ezhilan Naganathan posted a cryptic message on X with a clip from the Tamil movie Dhool in which a man speaking on the phone says “Sangeetha, love is like a flower on a creeper. Once, it withers it never blooms.

Many interpret this as a hint that the DMK had advance knowledge of the filing.

The leak occurred just four days later, aligning suspiciously with Vijay’s intensified election preparations.

Sun News, part of the Sun Network owned by the Maran family—close relatives of DMK patriarch M. Karunanidhi—has been targeting Vijay since the beginning and was one of the first to break the news of Sangeetha’s divorce petition. This affiliation has led many to question whether the channel was tipped off or actively involved in amplifying the story to tarnish Vijay’s image.

If proven, the DMK’s involvement could backfire, alienating voters who value privacy and fair play. For now, Vijay’s fans rally behind him, viewing this as a test of his resilience.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Dravidian Model = Sticker Model: UPSC Rank-2 Rajeshwari Credits Naan Mudhalvan Scheme, But Timeline Shows Years Of Private Coaching

Rajeshwari Suve M from Madurai has secured All India Rank (AIR) 2 in the UPSC Civil Services Examination 2025, emerging as the only woman among the top five rank holders this year. Her success marks another milestone in a career already rooted in public service, she had earlier cleared the TNPSC Group I examination and was serving as a Deputy Collector before cracking the UPSC exam.

An Electrical Engineering graduate from Anna University, Chennai, coming from a family of businessman father + Asst Prof mother, Rajeshwari completed her degree in 2018. For the UPSC Civil Services Examination 2025, she chose Sociology as her optional subject and has opted for Tamil Nadu as her home cadre.

According to the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC), a total of 958 candidates have been recommended for appointment to various central civil services after the completion of the examination process, which includes the preliminary examination, the main examination, and the personality test (interview).

Credits ‘Naan Mudhalvan’ Scheme

Following the announcement of the results, Rajeshwari credited the Tamil Nadu government’s “Naan Mudhalvan” scheme for playing a key role in her UPSC success.

Speaking to ANI, she said, “I secured All India Rank 2 in the 2025 Civil Services examination. I was a bit surprised, of course. It was a long journey for me – from 2018. I passed out in 2018; I am a BE graduate. So it is a journey of seven years. With the guidance of the Tamil Nadu government’s Nal Mudhalvan scheme, it has become possible now.”

Explaining the role of the scheme in her preparation, she stated, “I was one of the beneficiaries in the first batch itself. In 2024, I got selected among the thousand people who were given financial assistance for the Prelims examination – that is ₹7,500 per month for 10 months.”

She further said that the programme supported her through subsequent stages of the exam as well.

“When I cleared my Prelims, I was getting coaching for Mains here. They gave financial assistance of about ₹25,000 for Mains and ₹50,000 for the interview. Other than financial assistance, the Nal Mudhalvan team has great faculty support for students.”

According to Rajeshwari, the scheme’s guidance helped candidates focus on what is relevant for the civil services examination. “What I feel is they direct us in the correct direction – only what is relevant to UPSC. So the UPSC relevance is very high in the Nal Mudhalvan scheme.”

Explaining her family background, she said, “I am from Madurai district. My father is Mr. Murugadas and he is a businessman. My mother is Mrs. Nagarani and she is an Associate Professor of Mathematics. I have a younger sibling, Kumar Selvan, who is doing MBBS now. I did my graduation in BE.”

Earlier Interview Credits Appolo Coaching

However, an earlier interview given by Rajeshwari in 2024 to Appolo Study Centre, a private coaching institute, presents a different account of her preparation journey particularly regarding her TNPSC success.

Introducing herself in that interview, she said: “Vanakkam. My name is M. Rajeshwari Suvi. I am from Madurai district. In the recently concluded Group 1 examination, I have secured State Level Rank 11.”

She explained that after graduating in 2018, she initially began preparing for UPSC.

“When I first passed out in 2018, I was initially preparing for UPSC. That one year was like a UPSC foundation course, which helped me gather general knowledge.”

She said she appeared for the TNPSC Group I preliminary examination in 2019, clearing it despite not having taken formal coaching.

“In that same year, 2019, I appeared for the Group 1 Prelims for the first time. But I had not done any proper coaching or preparation specifically for TNPSC. Even so, I cleared the Prelims.”

However, she added that she was unable to clear the mains stage that year due to lack of guidance.

“Without proper guidance, I didn’t focus well on Mains. I self-prepared and appeared, but I couldn’t clear the Mains.”

According to her earlier account, she decided to prepare more systematically when the next TNPSC notification was issued in 2020.

“I told myself – this time I need to do it properly and effectively. So in 2020, I properly started preparing specifically for TNPSC. That is when I joined Appolo.”

She further stated: “My entire TNPSC journey from 2020 until now has been oriented around Appolo.”

Rajeshwari credited the institute’s guidance and test series for helping her succeed in the exam.

“From that point onwards, it has been entirely under the guidance of Appolo Director Mr. Sam Rajeswaran sir that I have completed my entire TNPSC journey.”

She eventually secured State Rank 11 in the TNPSC Group I examination, leading to her appointment as Deputy Collector in 2024.

The Timeline Does Not Add Up

The Naan Mudhalvan scheme was launched in 2022, and its UPSC scholarship component has been operational since 2023 meaning the 2024 cycle was the scheme’s second annual cohort of 1,000 beneficiaries, not the first. Yet Rajeshwari claims she was part of ‘the first batch itself’, a claim that does not hold up against the scheme’s own documented timeline. What she received in 2024 was financial assistance at the final leg of a seven-year journey built almost entirely on private coaching.

By the time Rajeshwari became a Naan Mudhalvan beneficiary, she had already cleared TNPSC Group 1, was already an appointed Deputy Collector, and had already spent six years preparing for competitive examinations – the bulk of it under private coaching at Appolo Study Centre. The scheme’s financial support came at the very tail end of a long journey that had been built entirely on private coaching, personal perseverance, and family support. To now project Naan Mudhalvan as the foundational enabler of her success is, at best, a selective retelling. At worst, it is a political script handed to a topper and faithfully delivered.

This is not a unique occurrence. The DMK government has a well-documented pattern of retrofitting its schemes onto achievements that predate or only marginally involved them, then amplifying those narratives through state media and sympathetic press.

Is Naan Mudhalvan Scheme Being Misused?

Crucially, the Naan Mudhalvan UPSC Scholarship is not a general merit scheme – it is explicitly designed for ‘economically disadvantaged UPSC aspirants’ who lack the financial means to pursue coaching on their own. By 2024, Rajeshwari was a serving Deputy Collector drawing a government salary, from a family that includes an Associate Professor mother and a businessman father – by her own admission to ANI. That a well-placed government officer occupied one of 1,000 slots meant for economically backward candidates and then publicly credited that scheme as the hero of her success raises questions that go beyond narrative management.

What This Means

None of this diminishes Rajeshwari Suve’s extraordinary achievement. A seven-year journey, five UPSC attempts, cracking both TNPSC Group 1 and UPSC CSE in the top ranks – that is a story of exceptional grit that needs no political embellishment. Her success belongs to her, her family, and the coaches who guided her for years.​

What it does raise is a pointed question about the weaponisation of individual achievement for scheme propaganda and the role of a compliant media ecosystem in amplifying that propaganda without verification. Every major news channel ran the Naan Mudhalvan credit line. Not one, until now, thought to check what Rajeshwari herself had said on camera just twelve months earlier.​

The 2024 Appolo interview exists. It is timestamped. It is on YouTube. The contrast with the 2026 post-result interviews is stark. And it raises a question that Rajeshwari, and the Tamil Nadu government, owe the public an honest answer to: at what point did Naan Mudhalvan become the hero of a story that Appolo Study Centre and six years of private preparation had actually written?

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

TVK Head Joseph Vijay’s Estranged Wife Seeks Interim Right To Stay In Matrimonial Home Amid Divorce Proceedings

TVK Head Joseph Vijay's Wife Sangeetha Files For Divorce, Cites Extramarital Affair

Sangeetha Sornalingam, (also referred to as Sankgeetha Vijay), the wife of actor Thalapathy Vijay, has filed another petition in court as part of the ongoing divorce proceedings between the couple, seeking protection of her residential rights.

In the latest application before the court, Sangeetha expressed concern that she could be denied accommodation in the couple’s present matrimonial home while the case is pending. She has therefore requested an interim order allowing her to continue residing in the house until the divorce proceedings are concluded.

Petition Seeks Interim Residence Order

As reported in India Today, according to the petition, Sangeetha has sought legal protection to ensure that she is not prevented from staying in the matrimonial home during the course of the case. The application asks the court to grant her the right of residence as an interim measure while the divorce proceedings continue.

The filing forms part of the broader legal battle between the couple, who have been married for more than two decades.

Divorce Petition Filed After 27 Years of Marriage

Earlier, Sangeetha filed for divorce from Vijay after 27 years of marriage. The couple married on 25 August 1999 and have two children – Jason Sanjay and Divya Shasha.

In the divorce petition, Sangeetha alleged that Vijay was involved in an extramarital relationship with a female actor. According to the filing, she became aware of the alleged relationship in 2021.

The petition further stated that although Vijay allegedly assured her that the relationship would end, it continued. The filing also claimed that Sangeetha was gradually excluded from the actor’s social and professional life.

According to the petition, Vijay travelled abroad and attended public events with the said actor, and photographs of these outings were shared on social media. Sangeetha has claimed that the public circulation of such images caused humiliation to her and their children.

Grounds for Divorce

Sangeetha has cited adultery and cruelty as grounds for divorce under the provisions of the Special Marriage Act, 1954. In her petition, she stated that the alleged conduct and the resulting controversies had caused her severe mental distress.

Case Ongoing in District Court

The matter is currently being heard in a district court, where both the divorce petition and the application regarding residential rights are under consideration. The court has yet to deliver a decision on either plea.

Sangeetha, the daughter of a Tamil industrialist, was reportedly a fan of Vijay before the two married in 1999. Their wedding was conducted with both Hindu and Christian rituals.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

DMK Ally SP Spokesperson’s Op-Ed In Indian Express Calls Iran War A ‘Black Swan’ For BJP; IE Deletes Post After Backlash, Keeps Article On Website

DMK Ally SP Spokesperson’s Op-Ed In Indian Express Calls Iran War A ‘Black Swan’ For BJP; IE Deletes Post After Backlash, Keeps Article On Website

The Indian Express published an opinion piece by DMK/I.N.D.I ally Samajwadi Party spokesperson Ghanshyam Tiwari that attempts to portray a hypothetical Middle East escalation as a “Black Swan event” that could bring down the BJP government. The piece frames a potential conflict involving Iran, Israel, and the United States not as a serious geopolitical crisis but as a possible political turning point in Indian domestic politics.

It reads less like geopolitical analysis and more like a political prayer that a regional crisis will become the BJP’s electoral undoing. Let us take it apart, claim by claim.

The Indian Express Deleted the Post On X But Left the Article Up

Before even engaging with the article’s content, there is a separate and pointed question of editorial conduct to address. The Indian Express published the op-ed and shared it on its official social media handles.

Then, following a wave of public backlash pointing out the op-ed’s wishful thinking and brazenly partisan framing, the newspaper quietly deleted its social media post promoting the piece. The article, however, remains live on its website.

This tells you everything about the editorial calculus at play. The newspaper knew, after the backlash hit, that the piece was indefensible in public. Deleting the tweet was an acknowledgment of that. Yet the article stayed up, meaning the retraction was not based on principle but on optics management.

The Indian Express wanted to limit the social media damage while keeping the search-engine-indexed article in place for continued circulation. That is not editorial courage. That is having it both ways. A publication with genuine editorial standards would either defend its decision to platform the piece publicly and fully, or issue a correction. Silently deleting the social media post and hoping no one notices is the behaviour of an outlet that knows it got caught, not one that stands behind its editorial choices.

It also reveals the asymmetry in how The Indian Express treats controversy: when backlash comes from the right, the post disappears. When backlash comes from the left, the full editorial apparatus mobilises in defence of the author. The standard is plainly political.

The “Silence” That Wasn’t Silent

The op-ed’s most glaring factual failure is its central charge: that the Modi government “did nothing” and that its “silence speaks volumes.” This is simply false. Within 48 hours of the conflict’s escalation, Prime Minister Modi chaired an emergency meeting of the Cabinet Committee on Security specifically focused on the safety of India’s nearly 90 lakh Gulf expatriates. He then conducted a rapid diplomatic blitz: holding calls with the leaders of Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, UAE, and other Gulf states, condemning the attacks and pressing for de-escalation. The Ministry of External Affairs had in fact issued travel advisories for Iran as early as January 5 and January 14, weeks before hostilities fully escalated, urging Indian nationals to leave by any available means. India issued one again on 23 February 2026.

For the UAE specifically, advisories were issued on February 28 and again on March 3. IndiGo and Air India added special flights to evacuate stranded Indians, and Etihad flights were already resuming operations from Dubai and Abu Dhabi at the time the op-ed was published.

Moreover, India has repeatedly demonstrated its ability to respond effectively during regional emergencies. From Operation Rahat in Yemen (2015) to Operation Ganga in Ukraine (2022) and evacuations during conflicts in West Asia, New Delhi has built a strong record of protecting its citizens abroad when crises unfold.

The insinuation that the government knowingly withheld warnings from expatriate Indians in the Gulf is not analysis; it is speculation bordering on political theatre.

The article either did not know these facts or chose to ignore them. The Indian Express published it either way.​

The IRIS Dena: Weaponising a Tragedy

The sinking of IRIS Dena, a genuine tragedy in which over 100 sailors remain missing, is deployed in the op-ed as evidence of India’s “submission” to the US and Israel. The IRIS Dena was sunk by a US Navy submarine in international waters approximately 20 nautical miles west of Galle within Sri Lanka’s Search and Rescue responsibility zone, not India’s.

India is not a military alliance partner of Iran, was not IRIS Dena’s escort, and has no operational obligation to intercept a US submarine strike in open ocean. Yes, India did invite Iran to participate in the MILAN 2026. Once a participating vessel departs Indian waters and re-enters the open ocean, it reverts fully to its own nation’s operational command and responsibility. India has zero legal, operational, or treaty-based obligation to escort it beyond Indian territorial or exclusive economic zone waters.

No navy in the world escorts foreign exercise participants back to their homeports. The US, UK, France – none of them escort Indian Navy ships back to Visakhapatnam after joint exercises. The obligation simply does not exist in any framework of international maritime law or naval protocol. Holding India responsible for IRIS Dena’s fate after it left Indian waters would be equivalent to holding a host country responsible for a visiting diplomat’s car accident after they crossed the border. The logic does not survive basic scrutiny.

The Indian Navy is, however, already conducting search and rescue operations, which is exactly what India can and should do.

The Strategic Autonomy India Is Actually Exercising

The deeper geopolitical reality the article deliberately ignores: India is the only major power talking to all sides simultaneously. Modi has engaged Netanyahu, Gulf Arab leaders, and kept Iranian diplomatic channels open. India abstained rather than aligned during relevant international deliberations. India has very little to gain by taking a hard stand in such a situation. This is not submission to the US-Israel axis, as the article implies. If it were, a nuclear-armed India with US-supplied technology would have been an active staging ground for strikes on Iran. It obviously is not.

India today is one of the few countries that maintains working relationships with every major power bloc in the Middle East. This diplomatic flexibility, often described as strategic autonomy or multi-alignment, allows New Delhi to protect its interests in an increasingly polarised world.

The region has faced crises before, and it will face them again. India’s response will continue to be guided not by partisan anxieties but by long-standing principles of pragmatic diplomacy, strategic balance, and the protection of Indian citizens worldwide.

That is not geopolitical analysis. It is partisan speculation masquerading as strategy.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Frontline Editor Vaishna Roy Justifies Grotesque Anti-Brahmin Cartoon, Calls Criticism A “Deflection”

Frontline, the national magazine published by The Hindu, plastered its March 2026 cover with a grotesque anti-Brahmin caricature that recalls the darkest techniques of 20th-century racial propaganda.

The Hindu which has gone on to become a Leftist-Dravidianist rag peddling propaganda instead of objective news has crossed a line from partisanship into something far uglier — the visual demonization of an entire community.

Rather than grappling with the substance of the nationwide debate over the University Grants Commission’s newly proposed Equity Regulations, 2026, the magazine chose to splash its cover with a grotesque caricature of a Brahmin figure onto Edvard Munch’s famous artwork The Scream, complete with exaggerated cultural markers, styled in a manner disturbingly reminiscent of early 20th-century racial propaganda.

After The Commune’s report on the same, the cover became a talking point.

Following the condemnation and outrage from across social media, leftist rag Newslaundry ‘reached out’ to Vaishna Roy, the editor of Frontline to ‘hear her side of the story’ – something Newslaundry would have never done had the case been reversed.

Instead of acknowledging these concerns, Frontline editor Vaishna Roy dismissed the outrage as a “deflection” from the debate surrounding the UGC regulations that have been stayed.

Speaking to a media outlet, Roy defended the cover and said the illustration had been republished with permission from the anti-caste portal The Ambedkarian Chronicle. She described it as a “clever adaptation” of Edvard Munch’s iconic painting The Scream, which is now in the public domain.

Sacred Symbols Reduced to Caricature

Roy claimed that the janeu and shikha are widely used in films, cartoons, and theatre as visual shorthand for a devout or dominant Hindu figure. She argued that the illustration was intended to highlight what she described as contradictions between demonstrative religiosity and unjust social behaviour.

Such reasoning effectively normalises the caricaturing of Hindu religious markers. For them, the issue is not artistic adaptation but the deliberate reduction of a religious community’s symbols into objects of ridicule.

If similar caricatures were drawn using markers associated with other religious communities, the response from the same media ecosystem would likely be very different.

Let us understand the problem with her ‘arguments’.

The “Power” Argument Is Self-Serving

Editor Vaishna Roy’s central defence rests on the claim that the image is acceptable because it represents the “oppressor” speaking back to “power.” But this logic is both circular and dangerous. It pre-emptively declares an entire community, Brahmins, as a monolithic power bloc, strips them of individual identity, and then licenses any visual degradation against them on those very grounds. In other words, the caricature is justified because the community deserves caricature. That is not critique. That is prejudice with a theoretical alibi.

By this logic, any ethnic or religious community deemed “dominant” by ideological fiat can be grotesquely illustrated without editorial accountability. No mainstream Indian magazine would dare run a similar exaggerated caricature of a Muslim cleric or a Dalit elder under the headline “Outraged” nor should they. The asymmetric application of this standard is the tell.​

The Nazi Comparison the Editor Missed or Was It Subconscious?

Roy’s dismissal of the Nazi comparison is rhetorically clever but analytically weak. She argues the Nazi parallel fails because Jews were a minority being mocked by a majority in power. But this reframes the question to dodge it.​

The comparison was never about the power dynamic; it was about the aesthetic technique. As documented analysts have noted, the illustration deploys the same well-worn visual grammar of 20th-century racial propaganda: an exaggerated, emaciated figure defined entirely by ethnic-religious markers: shaven head, tuft (shikha), sacred thread (janeu), sacred ash rendered in a posture of hysterical alarm. This is the exact aesthetic of Das Gejammer – the sneering Goebbelsian mockery of a target group as simultaneously weak and dangerously powerful. Roy addresses the politics; she deliberately sidesteps the aesthetics. That sidestep is the tell.​

The “Dual Framing” Deception

The cover headline uses the plural, abstract term “dominant castes.” The artwork, however, deploys unmistakably Brahmin-specific iconography – not Kshatriya, not Vaishya, not any other “twice-born” community Roy mentions. This gap between the headline and the image is not accidental artistic shorthand. It is, as has been rightly identified, a rhetorical escape hatch – broad enough in text to evade legal or institutional challenge, specific enough in imagery to send a targeted communal message to its readership. Roy herself tacitly confirms this by listing only Brahmin-coded symbols while claiming they represent “dwija castes broadly.” If the intent was truly plural, the imagery would have been plural.

Kalpana Kannabiran: The Irony the Magazine Buried

The single most striking fact in this entire episode is one Frontline and Newslaundry buried in plain sight: the article that inspired the illustration was written by Kalpana Kannabiran, herself a Brahmin (Iyengar) from Madurai, daughter of distinguished civil liberties lawyer K.G. Kannabiran.

The article, titled “Hostile Environments and Brahmanical Enclosures: The Fear of Equality,” thus has a Brahmin academic providing the intellectual framework for an illustration that grotesquely caricatures Brahmin identity.

This does not, by itself, make the caricature acceptable, it makes it more revealing. It illustrates how ideological positioning in Indian academia has become so identity-detached that a community’s own members provide the scaffolding for communal visual attacks against it, and that is presented as moral sophistication. The magazine chose not to foreground this context. Ask yourself why.

Sinnakaar’s Admission

Shripad Sinnakaar (the artist of Kannabiran’s article)’s candid statement that “Brahmins themselves constitute the apex of power structure that should be critiqued” is not an editorial policy – it is a declaration of communal targeting. He states that his primary reader is “a caste oppressed person” and that the publication serves that constituency. That is an explicitly sectarian editorial mandate. Publishing a grotesque caricature of a community and then claiming it is purely structural critique, not aimed at people but at “power”, while simultaneously declaring that community the legitimate and permanent target of critique, is a contradiction that no editorial integrity defence can bridge.

What This Is Really About

The UGC Equity Regulations triggered a legitimate public debate involving faculty, students, and institutions across caste backgrounds. Reducing that debate to a screaming Brahmin caricature does not advance the cause of Dalit rights or constitutional equality. It converts a policy argument into a communal provocation.

The “real offence,” as Roy puts it, may well be in the UGC regulations being stayed but packaging that argument inside a dehumanising ethnic caricature does not amplify the offence; it replaces it. It ensures that the conversation becomes about the image, not the policy. If that outcome is a “pity,” as Roy says, it is a pity the magazine’s own editorial choices manufactured.

The test is simple and consistent: would The Hindu Group publish a similarly styled, marker-laden caricature of a Dalit figure, a Muslim, or a Christian under the headline “Outraged”? The answer requires no research. And that answer tells you everything Vaishna Roy’s eloquent defence cannot.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Delhi: 26-Yr-Old Hindu Youth Tarun Kumar Beaten To Death After Holi Balloon Thrown By Child Splashes Muslim Woman

Delhi 26-Yr-Old Hindu Youth Tarun Kumar Beaten To Death After Holi Balloon Thrown By Child Splashes Muslim Woman

A 26-year-old man was beaten to death in Delhi’s Uttam Nagar area following a dispute triggered by an accidental splash of coloured water during Holi celebrations on Wednesday, police said.

The victim, identified as Tarun Kumar, was allegedly attacked by a group of people after a water balloon thrown during Holi festivities led to an argument between two neighbouring families in the JJ Colony area of southwest Delhi.

As reported in Times of India, according to police and accounts from the victim’s family, an 11-year-old girl from Tarun’s family was playing Holi on the terrace of her house and threw a water balloon aimed at her father standing below. The balloon fell on the road instead and splashed coloured water on a woman from a neighbouring Muslim family. The incident reportedly triggered an argument between members of the two households.

Family members said the dispute appeared to have been settled after an apology from Tarun’s family earlier in the day. However, tensions escalated later in the evening.

Police said Tarun was returning home on his motorcycle after celebrating Holi with a friend when he was allegedly stopped by a group of around 15 to 20 people. The group reportedly assaulted him with iron rods, bricks, stones and other objects.

When Tarun’s relatives and others rushed to intervene, they were also attacked during the clash. Eight people were injured in the violence, including Tarun’s father, Memraj, and his uncle Ramesh, police said.

Tarun sustained critical injuries and was taken to a nearby hospital, where he died during treatment on Thursday morning. Police confirmed that his death resulted from injuries sustained in the assault.

Following the incident, tensions rose in the locality and protests broke out. Some residents vandalised parts of the street and damaged the windows of several vehicles. Protesters also gathered outside the Uttam Nagar police station and raised slogans demanding action against those responsible.

Police later deployed additional personnel in the area to maintain law and order.

The victim’s father said the two families had lived in the neighbourhood for years and had no prior disputes. He stated that the confrontation began after the accidental splash of coloured water from the balloon but was initially resolved. According to him, Tarun was returning home in the evening when he was surrounded and attacked.

Delhi Police registered a case in connection with the incident and initially arrested four adults, while a juvenile was also apprehended. After Tarun’s death, murder charges under Section 103 were added to the First Information Report (FIR).

Authorities said the clash stemmed from the earlier balloon incident between members of two families belonging to different communities.

Tarun Kumar lived with his parents and two elder siblings, a brother and a sister, in Uttam Nagar. According to his family, he was pursuing a course in digital marketing.

Both families involved in the dispute originally hail from Rajasthan and have been residing in the Uttam Nagar area for nearly five decades.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Dravidian Model Law & Order: 30 Murders Reported Across Tirunelveli & Adjoining Districts In Just Two Months

Dravidian Model Law & Order: 30 Murders Reported Across Tirunelveli & Adjoining Districts In Just Two Months

A sharp rise in violent crime has raised alarm in southern Tamil Nadu, with nearly 30 murder cases reported over the past two months across Tirunelveli, Thoothukudi, and Tenkasi districts, which fall under the Tirunelveli police range.

According to police sources cited in a Daily Thanthi report, the surge in killings has triggered growing concern among residents about the deteriorating law and order situation in the region.

Officials said that more than five murders have been recorded in Tenkasi district alone this year. In neighbouring Tirunelveli and Thoothukudi districts, police registered 13 murder cases in January, followed by another 12 killings reported since February.

Among the recent incidents is a double murder reported near Nanguneri in Tirunelveli district. Police suspect the attack may have been carried out as an act of revenge linked to a murder that occurred several years ago. Preliminary investigations suggest that the assailants were allegedly under the influence of alcohol at the time of the attack.

Authorities also indicated that more than 10 women are among the victims in the recent spate of murders, adding to the seriousness of the situation.

Investigators say many of the killings appear to be linked to domestic disputes, illicit relationships, and alcohol-related conflicts. Substance abuse is increasingly being identified as a contributing factor in several of the violent incidents reported in the region.

The repeated acts of violence have caused anxiety among residents across the southern districts, with many questioning whether law and order conditions are deteriorating.

Social activists have called on police authorities to intensify surveillance and take firm action against history-sheeters, anti-social elements, and organised criminal gangs operating in the region. They have also urged authorities to invoke the Goondas Act against repeat offenders without discrimination in order to prevent further crimes and restore public confidence.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Drunk Constable In Uniform Accused Of Harassing Woman Inside Her Home In Chennai

Drunk Constable In Uniform Accused Of Harassing Woman Inside Her Home In Chennai

A police constable attached to the Ice House police station has come under investigation after allegedly entering a woman’s house in Royapettah, Chennai, in an intoxicated state and attempting to harass her.

According to reports, the incident occurred on Tuesday night within the jurisdiction of the Ice House police station. The victim, a 34-year-old woman residing in the area, was alone at home at the time.

Police said the constable, identified as Surya, allegedly entered the woman’s house while in uniform and under the influence of alcohol. He is accused of attempting to sexually harass the woman after entering the premises.

The woman reportedly reacted quickly by taking out her mobile phone and recording a video of the constable inside the house. She then managed to run outside, lock the door from the outside with the constable still inside, and alerted neighbours while calling for help.

Residents from nearby houses rushed to the spot after hearing her calls for assistance. Police were also informed about the incident and arrived at the location soon after. The constable was taken into custody and brought to the Ice House police station for questioning.

Officials said that since the constable was heavily intoxicated at the time, he was initially sent home after preliminary questioning. He has since been summoned again to the police station and is currently being interrogated.

Authorities have confirmed that a complaint has now been obtained from the woman and legal action will be initiated based on the complaint.

The accused constable Surya is posted at the Ice House police station itself. The incident has triggered concern among residents as the alleged misconduct occurred within the same jurisdiction where the officer serves.

Local residents have expressed shock over the incident, stating that the act of a police officer entering a woman’s home and attempting to harass her has created fear in the neighbourhood. Police said further investigation into the matter is underway.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

MK Stalin Tries To Comment On Geopolitics To Target Modi Govt, Ends Up Exposing His Ignorance

Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M. K. Stalin drew attention on social media after commenting on recent developments involving global oil supply and sanctions, but his remarks have triggered criticism from observers who say they were based on a misunderstanding of India’s energy policy.

The controversy began after the United States announced a temporary easing of sanctions to allow India to purchase Russian oil that is currently stranded at sea amid escalating tensions in the Middle East. According to a BBC report, the move came as millions of barrels of oil and gas remain stuck near the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow Gulf chokepoint through which nearly half of India’s crude oil and gas imports transit. The situation has grown tense after Iran warned that vessels attempting to pass through the area could face attacks following the conflict involving the United States and Israel.

In response to the development, Stalin posted a message on X criticising the Union government and questioning India’s strategic autonomy in foreign policy. In the post, he wrote: “When the United States decides to allow India to purchase Russian oil for just 30 days, it raises a fundamental question. Why should India need another country’s approval to secure its own energy needs? Equally troubling is the sinking of the unarmed Iranian warship IRIS Dena by the United States soon after it participated in the International Fleet Review 2026 naval exercise hosted by India in Visakhapatnam. When a ship that came to India as part of a multinational exercise meets such a fate, India cannot appear silent or passive. The Union BJP Government looks totally compromised on India’s long standing tradition of strategic autonomy and an independent foreign policy. India’s dignity in the international arena needs to be protected and the nation’s sovereignty and interests need to be defended.”

However, the premise of Stalin’s criticism is flawed because India has never actually stopped importing Russian crude oil since the Ukraine conflict began.

Following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, Western nations imposed sweeping sanctions on Russian energy exports. Despite these restrictions, India continued importing Russian crude throughout the sanctions period and in fact significantly increased its purchases, taking advantage of steep price discounts offered by Russian suppliers.

Before the Russia-Ukraine war, Russia accounted for less than one percent of India’s crude imports. In the months following the sanctions, Indian refiners ramped up purchases sharply, with Russia’s share of India’s oil imports rising to nearly 40% at its peak. Even during periods of sustained diplomatic pressure from the United States and Europe, India maintained substantial Russian imports while also expanding purchases from other suppliers.

In fiscal year 2024–25, Russian crude accounted for an average of about 36% of India’s total imports, with volumes rising roughly seven percent year-on-year to around 1.88 million barrels per day. Monthly figures occasionally approached the 39-40% mark, reflecting Russia’s dominant position in India’s crude supply during that period.

Data from late 2025 shows that Russia’s share of India’s crude imports fell to a 38-month low of about 24.9% in December 2025, largely due to new sanctions targeting companies such as Rosneft and Lukoil and the European Union’s ban on Russian refined products. For January 2026, India imported approximately 1.2 million barrels per day of Russian oil, keeping Moscow as its single largest supplier.

Traditional suppliers such as Iraq and Saudi Arabia have continued to occupy the second and third positions in India’s crude supply chain, though their shares declined in recent years as Indian refiners shifted toward discounted Russian crude. In January 2026, Saudi Arabia supplied about 774,000 barrels per day to India, significantly lower than Russia’s volumes.

These figures illustrate that India never halted Russian oil imports and has instead maintained a diversified sourcing strategy aimed at protecting domestic energy security while taking advantage of favourable global pricing.

As a result, Stalin’s remarks suggesting that India needed US approval to purchase Russian oil were based on an incorrect assumption about India’s actual energy trade practices.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Trees Cut, Land Dug, But No Stadium: Work Begins In Haste Before Udhayanidhi Visit To DMK Min Mano Thangaraj’s Constituency

Trees Cut, Land Dug, But No Stadium: Work Begins In Haste Before Udhayanidhi Visit To DMK Min Mano Thangaraj’s Constituency

A mini stadium project initiated in Kaladi Mammudu near Thiruvattaar village in Kanyakumari district has come under criticism after allegations that the facility, sanctioned at a cost of around ₹3 crore, has seen little progress even after nearly two years.

The project falls within the Padmanabhapuram Assembly constituency represented by Tamil Nadu Minister Mano Thangaraj. According to local residents, the mini stadium was announced as part of a development initiative by the Tamil Nadu Sports Development Authority, with funds reportedly allocated for the construction and basic infrastructure of the facility.

However, residents say that despite the allocation of approximately ₹3 crore for the project, only minimal preliminary work has been carried out so far. Large portions of the land remain dug up, and the site has reportedly been left incomplete for an extended period without significant construction activity.

Locals have also raised concerns that several trees that previously stood on the site, including government-owned trees, were cut down during the early stages of the project, with questions being raised about their subsequent disposal.

Recent activity at the site has reportedly increased following the scheduled visit of Tamil Nadu Deputy Chief Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin to the area. Residents claim that some minor work has begun only in the days leading up to the visit, including the hurried laying of a running track.

According to people familiar with the project, the original tender conditions required the work to commence within 270 days. However, nearly three years after the project was first initiated, only a small structure has reportedly been built, while other basic facilities expected in a sports complex — including a proper running track and usable sporting infrastructure — remain absent.

The condition of the mini stadium has raised questions among residents about the progress of sports infrastructure projects in the region and the effectiveness of their implementation. The issue has also begun to feature in local political discussions ahead of the 2026 Tamil Nadu Assembly elections, with residents expressing concerns about the pace and quality of development works in the constituency.

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by Tamil Janam (@tamiljanam)

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.