Home Blog Page 1211

Kalakshetra Row: Police Close Case Against Leela Samson Who Called A Girl Student ‘Mistress’, Claims She Meant ‘Leader’

leela samson kalakshetra

The controversy surrounding Kalakshetra Foundation about alleged sexual harassment in the institution started when its former director Leela Samson made damning accusation in her Facebook post.

In her now-deleted Facebook post, Leela had accused a teacher (who she did not name) of sexual harassment and even linked him with another girl student calling her his ‘mistress’.

She had claimed that because of the said teacher, one of the alleged victims had an abortion and that she wanted to marry him.

In the next line, Leela Samson alleged that the teacher has an intern as a “mistress” and publicly shamed her by naming her . The context, tone and tenor of Leela Samson’s post gives away that she had used the word “mistress” with a sexual connotation.

The aggrieved intern who goes by the handle Believeinkarma (@karmayogi_06) on Twitter had registered a complaint against Leela Samson for unwarrantedly tarnishing her and outraging her modesty in public forum.

The Adyar All Women Police Station which is investigating the allegations against Kalakshetra Foundation and Haripadman, is also probing the complaint against Leela Samson.

According to journalist Sandhya Ravishankar, the police closed the complaint against Samson and when the complainant had asked the reason, she was told that “mistress” means “ejamaani” (in Tamil ejamaani means a feudal landlady).

Apparently when Leela Samson was questioned, the explanation she offered was that she meant the word Mistress to be “leader” since the intern took tuitions for Haripadman’s son.

The police were reportedly satisfied with this explanation and closed the case as Leela Samson had already took down her post.

The aggrieved student has alleged that Leela Samson has been made to go scot free despite it being a clear case of cyber bullying, harassment, and defamation.

“Take it to the court”, Leela Samson had apparently told the student victim.

It must be noted that Leela Samson’s Facebook posts along with articles published by the likes of The News Minute had snowballed into a controversy with full fledged protests by students with the institution closing down temporarily. Dance teacher Haripadman, who became the main target of the protest is now in Puzhal jail with his bail application being rejected by the Saidapet court.

The National Commission for Women (NCW) which had taken cognizance of the case has so far found no evidence to support the allegations.

The NCW has been asking concerned persons to appear before them to take necessary action.

The NCW had asked Leela Samson to present herself before the commission on 11 April 2023.

However, Leela Samson through her lawyer Vrinda Grover had e-mailed the commission on 7 April 2023 that she was in Australia and that she is due for travel to India adding that for the next two weeks or so, Leela would not be able to present herself physically before the commission due to her engagements and restrictions in travel due to COVID vulnerability.

If one had to go by her claims in the email, Leela Samson was supposed to be quarantining in Delhi but she was found loitering around in Mumbai to participate in the cultural programmes at the Nita Mukesh Ambani Cultural Centre.

Click here to subscribe to The Commune on Telegram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“Sceptre Thing, Lying Down And All That”: Rahul Gandhi Insults Historic Sengol During US Trip

During his ongoing visit to the United States, Rahul Gandhi, a disqualified Member of Parliament from the Congress party, not only made derogatory remarks about Sengol and Hindu culture but also accused the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) of using the New Parliament building as a means to divert the public’s attention from real issues. He made these statements while addressing a gathering of Congress supporters in San Francisco during his week-long visit.

Gandhi’s remarks came in response to a question from a member of the Silicon Valley Christian Community, identified as Mr. Jay.

Jay asked for Gandhi’s views on the increase in Lok Sabha seats to 888, suggesting that Prime Minister Modi’s plan for delimitation based solely on population would favor highly populous states, leading to a disproportionate allocation of resources and benefits. He expressed concern about the vulnerability of minorities in such a scenario.

Gandhi responded by saying that he was not aware of how the BJP arrived at the number 800 and the criteria used for it. He emphasized that such decisions should not be taken lightly and that India is a country of diverse languages, people, histories, and cultures. He stressed the importance of a fair negotiation among all states.

When informed that the allocation is based on population, Gandhi commented that it depends on how the ratios change. However, he seemed visibly uncomfortable with the question and chose to mock Sengol, the New Parliament Building, and Prime Minister Modi simultaneously. He dismissed them as distractions from the real issues in India, such as unemployment, rising prices, growing anger and hatred, a deteriorating education system, and the high cost of education and healthcare. Gandhi suggested that the BJP avoids discussing these pressing concerns and resorts to theatrics instead. He humorously mentioned the “skepta” (Sceptre or Sengol) gesture associated with lying down and expressed satisfaction that he was not engaging in such theatrics, which garnered applause from the audience.

The Sengol was given to India’s first Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru moments before Indian independence by the Thiruvavaduthurai Adheenam as a symbol of transfer of power.

This historic Sengol was languishing hitherto as Nehru’s “golden walking stick” in Anand Bhavan, the house museum in Prayagraj, which belongs to the Nehru family.

Rahul Gandhi is currently undertaking a 10-day trip to the United States, with San Francisco being his initial destination, followed by Washington DC and New York. It is noteworthy that his previous visit abroad, specifically to the UK, caused a significant controversy in India. During that visit, as a Member of Parliament, he faced accusations of disrespecting Indian democracy while speaking on foreign soil.

Click here to subscribe to The Commune on Telegram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Alt News Journo & Serial Fake News Peddler Zubair Peddle Half-Truths About BJP TN Head Annamalai

On May 30, Mohammed Zubair, co-founder of AltNews and a propagandist posing as a fact-checker, once again shared a manipulated video to serve his own agenda. The video featured K Annamalai, a Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader, and was initially posted by AltNews journalist Abhishek. In the video, Annamalai is heard saying, “Who made CSK win is a BJP Karyakarta. Jadeja is a BJP Karyakarta, his wife is a BJP MLA, and he is from Gujarat.” The video was shared without any context or the background of the entire conversation.

Mohammed Zubair and his fellow colleague, insinuated that Annamalai was attributing the victory of the Chennai Super Kings (CSK) in cricket to the BJP. The intention was to make it seem like Annamalai was crediting a political party for a sporting win. However, the truth behind the video, which is often the case with Zubair and his team, was quite different. A longer version of the video shared by netizens reveals that Annamalai was not claiming credit for CSK’s win but was responding to the politicization of the victory by the ruling party in Tamil Nadu, DMK.

The Truth

CSK led by captain Mahendra Singh Dhoni won the match against Gujarat Titans by five wickets after Ravindra Jadeja hit a last-ball four to successfully chase down the revised target of 171 in a rain affected match.

During a discussion on News18, the anchor asked Annamalai about DMK’s claim that CSK’s win was a victory of the Dravidian model over the Gujarat model, aiming to bring politics into the cricket match. Annamalai’s response was to counter this narrative by mentioning that the player who hit the winning runs for CSK, Ravindra Jadeja, is a BJP Karyakarta, and his wife is a BJP MLA. He expressed pride in both the achievements of Tamil individuals and the BJP’s involvement in the victory. Annamalai clarified that he gave a political response because he was asked a political question.

Annamalai’s counter to the DMK and Dravidian media ecosystem propaganda was quoted by BJP Tamil Nadu’s official social media pages which Zubair used to justify his half-truths.

AltNews and other news portals, such as The News Minute, The Indian Express, Financial Express, and The Lallantop, spread misinformation about Annamalai’s statement by publishing misleading headlines that misrepresented the true context and explanation of the interview.

Click here to subscribe to The Commune on Telegram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Dravidian Outfit Instigates Hindus To Convert To Buddhism, Hindu Munnani Plunges Into Action

In Poyampalayam area of Tiruppur district, a Dravidian Group called Dravida Dhalam, issued a notice to the Hindus asking them to embrace Buddhism and collected donations with the intention of converting them to Buddhism.

The Dravidian Dhalam distributed leaflets which read, “To Remove The Taboo Of Being A Shudra Or Panchaman, Abandon Hindu Faith And Embrace Buddhism”.

The notice has several alleged quotes of EV Ramasamy Naicker (hailed as Periyar by his folllwers) asking people to embrace Buddhism.

This notice caught the attention of the Hindu Munnani members.

Upon becoming aware of this development, local Hindu leaders of Hindu Munnani swiftly responded by visiting the premises and advising the members of the Dravidian Dal against engaging in activities that promote religious conversions.

The incident caught the attention of local authorities, leading the Hindu Munnani members to report the matter to the police station. By notifying the authorities, they sought police intervention to ensure that appropriate measures are taken to prevent any disturbances and maintain the peaceful coexistence of diverse religious communities in the region.

Click here to subscribe to The Commune on Telegram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.By

From Sengol To Chanakya And Samudra Manthana, The New Parliament Boasts The Epic Journey Of Indian Civilization

On 28 May 2023 Prime Minister Narendra Modi inaugurated the new Parliament building and placed the historic and sacred golden sceptre ‘Sengol’ near the Lok Sabha Speaker’s chair.

When compared to the former Parliament building, the new complex is significantly larger with magnificent features.

The new Parliament building, which replaced the old circular structure, is triangular in design and stands directly opposite the 90-year-old complex that housed both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha.

The new Parliament building not only fits modern standards, but also demonstrates the breadth and depth of Indian culture and civilisation.

As India transitions from the darkness of the colonial past to the light of Sanatana Dharma, here’s the civilizational importance of the new Indian Parliament.

The Vaastu Shastra Behind The Design

The guiding concepts for the roughly 5,000 works of art (paintings, ornamental art, wall panels, stone sculptures, and metal objects) displayed across 65,000 metres of space at the new Parliament building are Sanatana Parampara and Vaastu Shastra.

If the previous Parliament House guided post-independence India, the new structure would bear testimony to the birth of ‘Aatmanirbhar Bharat.’

Credits to the Ahmedabad-based HCP Designs, this modern temple of democracy incorporates Indian elements and showcases India as a rising power.

The new Parliament building is triangular in shape and is built right next to the existing Parliament House.

The triangular (actually hexagonal) shape was chosen because of the “sacred geometrics” of the shape.

The head of HCP Designs Bimal Patel had said that, “Many sacred geometrics celebrate ‘triangles’ and ‘trinities – The Sri Yantra uses a triangle, the three Gods or the Trinities are a triangle and therefore the triangle is sacred.”

Besides these, the new building’s six entrances exhibit guardian statues showing auspicious animals.

These “auspicious animals” have been chosen based on their importance in Indian culture, Vaastu shastra and traits such as wisdom, victory, power, and success.

Each animal chosen to be installed in the building possesses a set of affirmations, spreading well-being and harmony.

Guarding the ceremonial entrance to the north is the gaja (elephant), which represents wisdom, wealth, intellect, and memory.

According to Vaastu Shastra, the northern direction is associated with Mercury, which is the source of higher intellect.

Standing alert and ready at the southern entrance is the ashva (horse), which is symbolic of endurance, strength, power, and speed, describing the quality of governance.

Soaring at the eastern entrance is the garuda (eagle), which symbolises the aspirations of the people.

In Vaastu shastra, the east is associated with the rising sun, representing victory.

The north-eastern entrance has hamsa (swan), which represents discernment and wisdom.

The remaining entrances showcase the makara (a mythical aquatic creature that is a combination of the body parts of different animals), which represents unity in diversity, and the shardula (a mythical animal that is said to be the most powerful of all living beings), which symbolises the power of the people of the country.

The underlying narrative is to highlight “5,000 years of Indian civilisation”. 

An official vision document entailing the objectives of artwork at the building, that was reviewed by The Indian Express, states: “The artworks and its installation represent sanatan parampara that continued over thousands of years. Along with that, the overall theme is designed keeping in mind the study of Vaastu shastra and maintaining the character of the building.” While sanatan parampara broadly refers to Hindu culture, which is believed to have been in continuity for centuries, Vaastu shastra is the traditional Indian system of architecture based on ancient texts that describe principles of design, layout, measurements, space arrangement and spatial geometry. 

Celebrating Civilizational Ethos

The sacred Sengol was installed next to the Speaker’s chair at the Lok Sabha House on the day of the inauguration. PM Modi entered the Lok Sabha house while carrying the Sengol, amid Vedic chants by high priests of several devotees (maths) in Tamil Nadu and sounds from ‘nadaswaram.’ PM Modi began the event by offering Sengol, a Sashtang Pranam. Every Indian will remember the video of him entering the house and then installing Sengol for the rest of their lives. It represents the rich culture of India. Sengol was regarded as a symbol of the road of service, loyalty, and nation in different ancient Hindu kingdoms. The Sengol became the sacred emblem of power transfer under the direction of Rajaji and Adheenam. This Sengol will continue to inspire us during the House procedures. 

Another feature of the new Parliament House that has been a talking point is the Samudra Manthan sculpture, which is situated along one of the building’s walls. Created by Murtikar Naresh Kumawat, the sculpture depicts the historic story of churning the milk sea. As the story goes, thousands of years ago, Devtas and Daanavs joined hands to churn the sea with the hope to get Amrit and other precious items. The scene depicts how the event took place. 

A dedicated display depicting the ‘Akhand Bharat’ in its true form is also present inside the New Parliament Building. The display has an old sculpture, a stone with ancient scriptures, and an old map of Bharat with regions mentioned by their historic names. You can see Kurukshetra, Hastinapur, Sindhu, Sauveer, Saurashtra, Dakshinapath, Amravati, Sidhpur, Chol, Kanchipuram, Keralputr and other regions written in Devnagri script. Along with the above mentioned, other sculptures in the new Parliament includes Chanakya- The father of political science, Hand Mudras- Representing the depth of Indian , and more. 

The new Parliament also serves as a symbol of Aatmanirbharata (self-reliance). India’s ‘Temple of Democracy’, the building is constructed using materials from all over the country, representing the diversity of India. The teak wood for the building was sourced from Nagpur, Maharashtra. The sandstone was procured from Sarmathura, Rajasthan. The carpets were imported from Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh. The bamboo wood flooring was from Agartala, Tripura. The stone jali works were obtained from Rajnagar, Rajasthan and Noida. The Ashoka Emblem was sourced from Aurangabad and Jaipur, while   Ashok Chakra was from Madhya Pradesh’s Indore. Some furniture was procured from Mumbai. The Lakha Red was got from Lakha in Jaisalmer, while the Ambaji White Marble was from Ambaji, Rajasthan. The Kesharia Green Stone was procured from Udaipur. The stone carving work was obtained from Abu Road and Udaipur, and the stone aggregate from Kotputali, Rajasthan.

The new Parliament building is thus not only a testament to India’s unity and diversity but also a symbol of the country’s commitment to democracy and its vision for the future.

Click here to subscribe to The Commune on Telegram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Dravidian Model: DMK Min Ponmudi Normalizes Students Unleashing Violence On Teachers

dmk ponmudi party post

In yet another contentious speech, DMK minister Ponmudi has spoken in support of students unleashing violence against teachers.

On Wednesday (May 31), a video of DMK minister Ponmudi went viral on social media, in which the minister is seen justifying and normalizing students’ violence against teachers.

Counseling for admission to Tamil Nadu’s Government Arts Colleges began on May 30th. In this regard, Minister of Higher Education Ponmudi paid a visit to Queen Mary College’s counseling centers in Chennai yesterday. In this regard, a video of a DMK minister speaking in front of teachers has gone viral on social media.

In the video, the DMK minister Ponmudi said, “Teachers are responsible for improving the standard of education. We may talk about education on stage, but it is the teachers who actually meet and teach the students. Once upon a time, teachers used to take a stick (rattan) and beat the students. Now, the time has changed when students take the stick and beat the teachers. It’s a new era. Therefore, teachers have to adjust to this and teach their students.”

This is not the first time that Ponmudi has spoken like this in public. On March 16, DMK minister Ponmudi, in a public meeting, yelled at a woman to ‘shut up’ when she came to him to express her grievances. Earlier, at a function in Villupuram, Ponmudi said to the women who had expressed their grievances, “As if you people of this village voted for me! Coming and questioning me! Sit down!” In another instance, Ponmudi also insulted women who were using the free bus service by referring to them as “OC Bus” users.

Click here to subscribe to The Commune on Telegram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Pa Ranjith: A Sane Voice Of Dalits Or A Slave Of Arivalayam?

On 28 May 2023, Prime Minister Narendra Modi inaugurated the new Parliament building and installed the historic Sengol, while Tamil Hindu Aadhenams sang Thevaaram songs inside the parliament.

This is the same Sengol which was presented to India’s first Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru by the Thiruvavaduthurai Adheenam moments before Independence as a mark of transfer of power from British to Indians.

History repeated itself again as special poojas were performed by priests and Aadheenams and an all faith prayer was also held before the Sengol was installed near the Speaker’s chair.

PM Modi, before receiving the Sengol from Aadhenams, prostrated before it as a mark of respect reflecting the Indian culture and tradition.

However, this celebration of India’s civilizational ethos on such a momentous occasion has caused uneasiness amongst the usual suspects comprising of leftist and Dravidian Stockists.

While the DMK voted against Draupadi Murmu in the Presidential elections, the party and its outer onion layers have shed crocodile tears saying that the Modi government has insulted the President by not inviting her for the new parliament inauguration.

Film director Pa Ranjith too strongly condemned the Modi government for not inviting President Draupadi Murmu for inauguration of the new Parliament building.

In his tweet, director Pa Ranjith said, “Mockery of Democracy. New Delhi: In modern, developed and glorious India the BJP promises to establish in the 75th year of Indian Independence – #AzadiKiAmritMahostav, the first Adivasi president of India- Honourable Madam Draupadi Murmu, not invited to grand inauguration of #CentralVista – the #NewParliament, to be held on 28th May.”

Ranjith attempted to draw a parallel between the exclusion of President Draupadi Marmu from the event and an incident in Tamil Nadu in which Dalits were denied entry into a temple by a caste Hindus, claiming that both the first citizen and the common people are oppressed in the country.

Ranjith said, “Villupuram, Tamil Nadu: Caste-Hindu groups protest against the entry of Dalits into Temple of Hindu Deity – Draupadi; alongside rampantly increasing caste atrocities in Tamil Nadu and across India. The plight of the nations first citizen and its common people remains same the caste-ridden Indian society, irrespective of the political parties; for all of them uphold the Hindu social order through rites, rituals and customs.”

He further added, “Several parties and governments have come and gone, irrespective of their ideologies and promises, all of them have strived to protect ritual purity, and continue to give rise to new forms of #untouchability, #castediscrimination and ill-practices in the name of caste, instead of eradicating the existing forms. Strong condemnations against the BJP for its continued unconstitutional and undemocratic actions and governance.”

However, Pa Ranjith’s track record of speaking up for the oppressed in society must be questioned because he refuses to comment on issues where the ruling DMK government is in a disadvantageous position. Several times in the past, after the DMK government took power in the state, he tried to be as soft as possible in his condemnation of the ruling DMK or preferred to remain silent.

His criticism of the BJP government for not inviting President Draupadi Marmu comes at a time when there have been a record number of manhole deaths in the case in a month in Tamil Nadu. However, Pa Ranjith has never spoken out about the manhole death in the state or criticised the DMK government, which is to blame. Tamil Nadu recorded eight manhole deaths in May 2023, with one at Ranipettai, three at Cuddalore, and two each at Puzhal and Meenchur. It should be noted that all of these places have long been considered DMK strongholds.

Though eight people died while entering manholes in the last month, the issue did not make headlines in Tamil Nadu, and the self-proclaimed Ambedkarist Pa Ranjith did not open his mouth because the DMK is in power.

After receiving criticism for his silence, Pa Ranjith spoke out about the manhole death in the state, but he avoided naming DMK in his tweet. Pa Ranjith, who has previously criticised Modi and the BJP by naming them, has chosen not to name the DMK in his tweet.

In his tweet, Pa Ranjith said, “Continuing Manhole deaths! We have sacrificed nine lives in Tamil Nadu in the last three weeks alone! We strongly condemn the Tamil Nadu people and government for continuing to perpetrate this terrible social calamity!!! Let us not consider manhole death to be a problem of a specific community, but rather a problem of the entire human society. We should make laws more stringent, increase public awareness, and attempt to prevent it immediately! Tamil Nadu’s government must immediately put an end to manhole deaths.”

It should be noted that no state in India has recorded 8 manhole deaths in a month. According to data from the National Commission for Safai Karamcharis (NCSK), Tamil Nadu has had 218 deaths in the last 29 years, far more than second Gujarat, which has had 153 deaths in the same time period.

Here is the number of sewer deaths in each state as per National Commission for Safai Karamcharis data (from 1993 to 28.02.2022):

Tamil Nadu – 218

Delhi – 97
Maharashtra – 39
Rajasthan – 38
Haryana – 84
Andhra Pradesh – 22
Punjab – 43
West Bengal – 23
Goa – 6
Uttarakhand – 8
Madhya Pradesh – 16
Telangana – 17
Gujarat 153
Uttar Pradesh – 107
Bihar – 2
Odisha – 2
Puducherry – 9
Karnataka – 86
Kerala – 13
Chandigarh – 3
Tripura – 2
Chhattisgarh – 1
Total – 989

According to a guidelines issued by the Union Government, state governments should form a committee of 14 official members and 11 non-official members to meet at least four times a year to discuss issues affecting sanitary workers. The committee will present its findings to the respective state Chief Ministers. However, the Tamil Nadu government’s committee has not convened this meeting even once in the last two years.

A few days ago, the DMK government appointed new member to this committee. However, there have been allegations that the members appointed by the DMK government are party members and that the union government’s recommendation to appoint those with experience in this field was ignored.

The committee has recently recommended that the state’s sanitation work be outsourced. The DMK government’s decision will have an impact on the poor, particularly those from the scheduled castes who rely on this job.

Though the Manual Scavenging Act 2013 requires vigilance agencies to be present at meetings convened by the state to discuss manual scavenging-related issues, it was alleged that the meeting convened by the DMK government a few days ago did not have a vigilance agency.

It is worth noting that almost all major Indian states have a commission for manual scavengers at the state level, whereas Tamil Nadu has only a toothless welfare board for manual scavengers.

The lack of these facilities in the state for the welfare of manual scavengers has resulted in an increase in manhole deaths. Self-proclaimed activists like Pa Ranjith, who should have been speaking out about the problems faced by manual scavengers, chose to remain silent but were very vocal during the inauguration of the new parliament building, which occurred at the same time.

Another recent incident exposes the hypocrite that Pa Ranjith is.

India’s Olympic medallist wrestlers Sakshi Malik, Bajrang Punia along with Vinesh Phogat and Sangeeta Phogat have been protesting against the Wrestler Federation of India chief Brij Bhushan Singh, who is also a BJP MP, demanding his arrest since April 23 over charges of sexual harassment.

Following a month long protest, they tried to march towards the new Parliament building from their protest site on the day of the inauguration when they were stopped and detained by Delhi Police personnel.

Pa Ranjith who is often hailed for bringing out feminist views in the films had voiced against the detaining of the protestors.

However, he has not called for action against lyricist Vairamuthu, who is close to the DMK and has been accused of sexual harassment by 19 women.

The director has remained zipped about the hooch tragedy in Tamil Nadu that caused 23 deaths, in which the perpetrators have direct links to the DMK.

While the media has hyped him up as an ‘intellectual’ and a voice of the oppressed, the man seems to be nothing more than a stooge of the DMK who barks after getting his crumbs from Arivalayam.

(Kaathavaraayan is a political writer and columnist.)

Click here to subscribe to The Commune on Telegram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Hindu Munnani Condemns TN Speaker For Demeaning President And Hindu Religion

The Hindu Munnani Chief, Kadeswara Subramaniam, stated that Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly Speaker M. Appavu should be removed from his position. In his statement, he said, “Speaker Appavu continues to speak, demeaning Hindu religious beliefs. The Hindu Munnani strongly condemns his statement that President Droupadi Murmu was not invited because the Parliament building would be sanctified with ganga water if she attended. The Speaker’s statement is an insult to the oath of office he took.”

“Does the Tamil Nadu Chief Minister accept the Speaker’s statement in an uncivilized manner that incites religious hatred? He should clarify this.”

Subramaniam also educated Appavu about the Nayanmars, the Tamil Shaivite saints, stating, “Appavu, who criticizes Hinduism, not only shows ignorance but also exhibits malicious intent. All 63 Nayanmars (saints) associated with temples and the entire community are aware that Guru Puja (worship) is performed every year.”

He also questioned Appavu for not addressing the issues within his own religion, saying, “At the same time, caste hatred and apartheid still prevail in the Christian religion to which Appavu belongs. If he has the courage to talk about this in public, let him do so. Did he know that even in graves, there is caste discrimination, and priests speak in an inhumane manner? Families of the deceased are refused burial because they did not contribute to the church tithe. The saying ‘people in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones’ applies to Appavu.”

“He takes pleasure in mocking the Hindu faith and presenting his distorted understanding of religious understanding. However, even without the presence of Christians, Tamil people would have maintained their cultural identity. By demeaning the Supreme leader of this great nation, who holds a high position in the Indian government, and insulting Sanatana Hindu Dharma and our country’s leader, he commits a constitutional offense. The Hindu Munnani strongly condemns Speaker Appavu’s indecent speech,” said Kadeswara Subramaniam.

“The Hindu Munnani urges the Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu and the Governor of Tamil Nadu to take necessary action and remove him from his position, considering the sentiments of the Hindu community,” stated the Hindu Munnani.

Click here to subscribe to The Commune on Telegram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Ulagam Suttrum Valiban: The Non-Political Film Of MGR That Propelled His Political Career

This article was originally published in Swarajya and has been republished here with permission.

Trivia question: Which is the only Indian movie that has, before the title credits, a few-seconds long clip of British mathematician, philosopher, and intellectual Betrand Russell while a voice over talks of his views on modern science?

The unlikely answer is M G Ramachandran’s (MGR) Tamil film Ulagam Sutrum Valiban (USV), which released 50 years ago in May 1973.

The film starts off with the fear over the wrong usage of science triggering the Third World War, about which Russell had opined a lot.

Also, according to MGR’s assistant Ravindar the former had developed a liking for Russell, so much so that when he became the chief minister in 1977, he wanted the intellectual’s 1938 book Power: A New Social Analysis to be translated into Tamil.

But USV, one of the three films directed by MGR — Nadodi Mannan and his last movie Madhuraiyai Meetta Sundharapandiyan being the other two — will be remembered mostly for being politically very important in the career of MGR, even though the film as such had no local political content in it.

To understand Ulagam Sutrum Valiban (world trotting young man) is to verily comprehend the politics of that time in Tamil Nadu, which was no less nasty and acrimonious than it is now. USV was made and released when MGR’s political life was at a crossroads of sorts.

The film had plenty of riding on it, as MGR had a point to prove to —

1) M Karunanidhi and the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) that wanted to stall the film at all cost.

2) Jayalalithaa, who had prior to the film had mentioned, with typical cheek and braggadocio, that he owed his popularity to her.

It was in October 1972 that MGR, who had been chucked out of the DMK in 1970 after he had fallen out with Karunanidhi, launched the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK) amidst questions whether he can translate his film popularity into winning political career all on his own.

Though Idhaya Veenai released exactly three days after the birth of the AIADMK, it was USV that is seen as his first film after he decided to go alone in politics.

Cinema-wise too, a lot was riding on USV as it was filmed extensively in locations like Hong Kong, Singapore, Japan and Thailand. MGR was making a comeback as a director a good 15 years after Nadodi Mannan.

DMK’s Dirty Tricks

USV was announced in 1970 but as MGR was getting busy as a political leader the film was delayed. As he was trying to sail in two boats simultaneously, there were many doubts whether he can be successful in both. The DMK and Karunanidhi tried to attack him on both the planks.

On the political platforms, the DMK men called, in pejorative tone, the AIDADMK as nadigarin katchi (actor’s party).

The large irony that the same actor and the film power was the one piloting the DMK till then was as usual lost on the stage-speakers of the Dravidian party.

It was said that Karunanidhi himself wanted to get USV stalled on its tracks — and it was not just for political reasons.

It was in that period that the DMK leader was firmly pushing for his son Mu Ka Muthu as hero in films. And he was marketed as ‘poor man’s MGR’. It was an open news that Karunanidhi’s plans for Muthu was among the reasons for MGR being ousted from the DMK.

As USV was taking time to get completed, rumours were spread that the film would never make it to the theatres. The misgivings also spread to the followers of the fledgling AIADMK and whenever MGR attended a political rally, the party workers would shout: “when will USV release?”

But MGR was never unsure. Even if it took time, he wanted to ensure that the film was good on its own. He was generous in spending on the film as a producer.

The movie, which was lavishly mounted and shot abroad (including at the Osaka Expo ’70), also had three Indian heroines. There was no Jayalalithaa in it. Instead, there was Manjula, and Latha, making her debut — both younger to Jayalalithaa by five years.

Talking of age, the fact MGR was around 55 years when the film was being made came in handy for the DMK to attack him. They said that the film was not Ulagam Sutrum Valiban but Ulagam Sutrum Kizhavan (world trotting oldie).

They also taunted by saying that the 50+ old man was playing hero to women who were not even out of their teens (both Latha and Manjula were 19).

Evidently, MGR did not heed the criticism. If anything, USV had two other ladies in important roles —the dancer Chandrakala and the Thailand actress Metta Roongrat.  In all, USV had five duet songs for MGR and plenty of fights that were a de rigueur in his movies.

Meanwhile, not just content with spreading canards, the DMK’s dirty tricks department actually got down to halt its release. It arm-twisted many of the theatre owners from accepting the film for release.

It was said that even the printing of the film at the local labs was prevented and MGR had it secretly processed at a Mumbai lab. The film’s release date was also kept hidden for long, and only in the week prior, it was let known.

Again, the DMK cadre threatened to attack the cinema halls. The then DMK Mayor of Madurai, Muthu (he was known as Madurai Muthu) openly claimed that if USV was indeed released he will start wearing saris.

On the release day, in Muthu’s Madurai, there was plenty of tumult. The screen at the Madurai Chinthamani theatre, where USV was to release, was set on fire.

But AIADMK men and MGR fans quickly managed to find another cinema hall — Madurai Meenakshi, to be precise — and USV arrived much to the delight of huge crowds. The queues in the front of the theatre, old-timers recall, ran till the next two streets.

The film quickly became a raging hit but there was also some disappointment that the film, which was about a scientist and his brother (MGR in dual roles) had nothing political in it.

The film does start with showing the AIADMK flag fluttering — first ever movie to show the flag of MGR’s party.

But beyond the title song Vetriyai Naalai Sarithiram Sollum — intriguingly written by one Pulavar Vedha about whom little was known before and little else known after — the political messaging was largely absent.

USV’s Success And Its Aftermath

But outside the theatres, politics quickly picked up from the film.  An unheralded AIADMK functionary S Periyasamy set the ball rolling by dispatching a sari to Madurai Muthu. Following this, the AIADMK cadre besieged his house with packets of saris.

A beleaguered Muthu, who couldn’t keep up his word, went into hiding. (That such a vehement and vitriolic critic later came back to MGR and also became the AIADMK’s Madurai Mayor later is a different story altogether).

Periyasamy, for his faithful efforts, was given the party ticket to contest the general elections in 1977, and he duly won from Periyakulam against the DMK candidate Palanivel Rajan (the father of Palanivel Thiaga Rajan who has been shunted to the IT Ministry from the Finance Ministry recently).

The success of USV also gave confidence to MGR to continue as an actor even while being a full-fledged politician. USV also established Latha as the leading screen lady of MGR. She would end up as MGR’s heroines in a total of 11 movies — one more than Jayalalithaa’s 10.

Talking of Jayalalithaa, she did try to patch up with MGR. It is said that she visited the shooting of USV in Japan (September 1970) for reasons that can only be guessed. But that visit might have helped her to stay in MGR’s reckoning at least politically later.

As is well known, there was to be a sequel to USV — they even mention it in the end-cards. It was to be christened Kizhakku Africavil Raju, but it never got made.

After USV, MGR acted in 15 more films. Though many of them were successful, none reached the heights of USV, which remains a milestone in his career — for sustaining his film legacy as well as providing his solo political career a much-needed boost in its infancy.

K Balakumar is the former editor of News Today and is currently a freelance writer writing on Tamil Nadu, sports, and films. He tweets at @kbalakumar.

Click here to subscribe to The Commune on Telegram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Annamalai Schools Karthigaichelvan For Politicising CSK IPL Win

Tamil Nadu BJP President Annamalai schooled News18 Tamil Nadu editor Karthigaichelvan for attempting to politicise the Chennai Super Kings’ win over Gujarat Titans as a victory of Tamils led by DMK over Gujaratis led by Modi, a narrative used by DMK and its allies following CSK’s win.

CSK led by captain Mahendra Singh Dhoni won the match against Gujarat Titans by five wickets after Ravindra Jadeja hit a last-ball four to successfully chase down the revised target of 171 in a rain affected match.

While the CSK’s victory was celebrated even by the opponents due to their admiration for Dhoni, the DMK and its IT wing members used the occasion to politicize the sport and call it a victory of the Dravida Model (CSK) over the Gujarat Model (Gujarat Titans). They attempted to portray CSK’s victory as a victory of South over North and DMK over Modi. Some insane DMK supporters attributed the CSK’s victory to Udhayanithi Stalin, the newly appointed Tamil Nadu Sports Minister.

However, CSK fans, celebrities such as Kasthuri Shankar, and the general public trolled the DMK for politicising a sport and urged them to keep their petty politics out of cricket. Cricket fans were united despite the DMK’s vicious campaigning. They claimed that a Tamilian Sudharshan contributed for Gujarat Titans and a Gujarati Ravindra Jadeja contributed for the CSK, and that the DMK should keep politics out of the CSK’s victory.

Attempting to play the North vs South and Tamil vs Gujarati narrative, News18 Tamil editor Karthigan Selvan, on the lines of the DMK, asked Tamil Nadu BJP president for his opinion on the statements of DMK leaders like TRB Raja viewing CSK’s victory through a political lens as a Tamils victory over Gujaratis.

In his respone, Tamil Nadu BJP president Annamalai said, “I wanted to respond to everyone (who politicized CSK’s victory) through your channel. The player who hit the winning runs for CSK is a BJP Karyakartha. Jadeja is a BJP Karyakartha, and his wife is a BJP MLA. Jadeja is from Gujarat. As a Tamilian, I am very proud of this. There were more Tamil people in GT than in CSK and I will celebrate that as well. The player who scored 96 runs for Gujarat is a Tamilian. We have to celebrate that too. Not one Tamilian played for CSK, still we support CSK for MS Dhoni. I am proud that the BJP’s Karyakartha scored the winning runs. The same will be repeated in 2024. TRB Raja and his followers in social media should understand this.”

Karthigai Selvan, who brought politics into cricket by quoting DMK’s TRB Raja’s comment on CSK’s victory, questioned Annamalai about his politicising of cricket and cricketers. He asked, “They said that the entire IPL is politicised. Are we now in a position to politicise players? That is a separate debate. However, I say this because you politicised Ravindra Jadeja.”

In response to Karthigai Selvan’s allegation, BJP President Annamalai stated, “I gave a political reply because you asked a political question. Only you pushed me to say that Jadeja is a BJP Karyakartha as you politicized cricket with your question.”

After being caught on air, Karthigai Selvan attempted to divert by claiming that he was talking about politics in cricket in general. This video is now widely shared in the internet.

Click here to subscribe to The Commune on Telegram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.