Recent discussions on India’s historical foreign policy decisions have reignited interest in the claim that former Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru declined offers for a permanent seat at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC). While some have dismissed these claims as myths, documented evidence from multiple credible sources—including archived letters, historical records/accounts, and statements by senior diplomats—affirm that Nehru did, in fact, reject at least two such offers: one in 1950 from the United States and another in 1955 from the Soviet Union.
1950: US Proposal To Replace China With India
According to a widely cited report by The Hindu (10 January 2004), former United Nations Under-Secretary-General Shashi Tharoor revealed that Nehru declined an offer from the United States in 1953 to take over China’s seat in the Security Council. Tharoor documented this in his biography “Nehru: The Invention of India“, stating that Nehru instead suggested the seat be given to the People’s Republic of China, despite its recent Communist takeover. The report stated, “Jawaharlal Nehru declined the United States offer to India to take the permanent seat on the United Nations Security Council around 1953 and suggested that it be given to China.”
Further corroboration comes from letters written by Vijayalakshmi Pandit, Nehru’s sister and India’s Ambassador to the United States at the time. During a 1950 meeting with U.S. adviser John Foster Dulles, Pandit was reportedly offered a proposal to have India replace China in the Security Council. Pandit’s correspondence with Nehru relays that he declined, explaining, “India, because of many factors, is certainly entitled to a permanent seat in the Security Council, but we are not going in at the cost of China.”
Nehru believed that such a move would provoke Beijing and compromise India’s stance on Asian solidarity. Ironically, twelve years later, China invaded India in 1962.
1955: Soviet Offer To Expand UNSC And Include India
In 1955, a second documented offer was made by the Soviet Union. This time, the proposal was not to replace any country but to expand the UNSC and include India as the sixth permanent member. Soviet Premier Nikolai Bulganin made the offer directly to Nehru.
Nehru once again declined, citing similar reasons. His statement at the time was, “We are opposed to pushing ourselves forward to occupy certain positions because that may itself create difficulties… This should not be done till the question of China’s admission and possibly of others is first solved.”
This position was consistent with what scholars refer to as “Nehruvian foreign policy,” which prioritized the idealistic unity of developing nations and respect for multilateral norms over strategic self-interest.
A detailed analysis of this offer is provided by the Wilson Center’s Cold War International History Project, titled “Not at the Cost of China: India and the United Nations Security Council, 1950”. The article confirms that Nehru’s primary objection was based on the principle—that the People’s Republic of China should first be admitted to the UN in place of the Chinese Nationalists (Taiwan), and only after resolving that issue should India be considered.
Jawaharlal Nehru’s Public Denial In Parliament
Despite these documented interactions, Nehru publicly denied in 1955 that any offer had been made. When asked in Parliament, he stated:
“There has been no offer, formal or informal, of this kind. Some vague references have appeared in the Press about it which have no foundation in fact.”
Historians have since speculated that Nehru either did not consider the proposals “serious” or sought to avoid domestic political complications.
Analysts have long debated whether these rejections were principled or imprudent. Critics argue that Nehru’s decisions deprived India of geopolitical leverage in crises such as the 1962 Sino-Indian War, the Kashmir disputes, and the 1971 Bangladesh Liberation War. In these instances, India had to rely on Soviet vetoes in the Security Council—a privilege it could have exercised independently had it accepted permanent membership.
Supporters of Nehru, on the other hand, argue that the U.S. proposal was never formal and was possibly a diplomatic maneuver to alienate India from China or enlist it in the Western bloc during the early Cold War.
As of today, all current permanent members of the UNSC—except China—publicly support India’s bid for permanent membership. Ironically, it is China, the very country for which Nehru sacrificed India’s seat, that continues to block India’s inclusion.
Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.