Home Blog Page 54

When Iran Seized An Indian Ship in 2013, Congress Said Nothing – Now It Lectures Modi

When Iran Seized An Indian Ship in 2013, Congress Said Nothing - Now It Lectures Modi

As US-Israeli strikes on Iran have reshaped West Asia and killed Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, India’s Congress party has launched a full-throated campaign accusing Prime Minister Narendra Modi of “betrayal,” “moral cowardice,” and abandoning a long-time ally. The irony is crushing and it is grounded in documented history.

This is the same Congress party that spent 26 days in studied silence in August 2013 when Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps illegally seized MT Desh Shanti, a government-owned Indian vessel, in international waters, confined 25 Indian crew members for nearly a month, and faced not a single press conference, not a single demand for accountability, not a single statement of condemnation from the Manmohan Singh government.

The Congress party and leaders of the I.N.D.I. bloc mounted a coordinated attack on Prime Minister Narendra Modi over India’s response to the reported assassination of Ali Khamenei. Mallikarjun Kharge condemned the killing and described the Modi government’s response as a failure, while Priyanka Gandhi called the assassination “despicable” and accused Modi of aligning with Israeli and US leadership. Jairam Ramesh termed the government’s stance a “betrayal of India’s values, principles, concerns, and interests,” and described the Prime Minister’s address at the Knesset as “shameful moral cowardice.”

Rahul Gandhi questioned whether the Prime Minister supported the assassination of a head of state and said India should have the courage to speak plainly in defence of international law.

Meanwhile, Sonia Gandhi wrote an op-ed in The Indian Express describing India’s silence as a “tacit endorsement” and an “abdication” of the country’s values. The Congress and other I.N.D.I. bloc parties have also demanded a full parliamentary debate, calling for both the Prime Minister and External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar to explain the government’s foreign policy position in both Houses of Parliament.

August 2013: Iran Seizes an Indian Government Ship – Congress Does Nothing

In August 2013, Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps intercepted MT Desh Shanti, a vessel belonging to the state-run Shipping Corporation of India, in international waters in the Persian Gulf. The ship was carrying crude from Basra to India. It was forcibly escorted to Bandar Abbas. The Indian Council of World Affairs subsequently documented the seizure occurred 400 nautical miles from the alleged pollution site – a clear violation of UNCLOS and international law.

The 25 Indian crew members were confined for 26 days without adequate food and water. The ship’s captain told Times Now that multiple Iranian inspections produced no evidence for their charges. The crew was released only after India summoned the Iranian Ambassador twice quietly, without any public pressure campaign and leveraged the fact that India had Iran’s own vessel Diyanat detained in Mundra port since 2012.

Throughout those 26 days, the Congress government under Manmohan Singh:

  • Held no press conference condemning Iran’s illegal seizure of a government vessel
  • Made no public statement demanding accountability from Tehran
  • Issued no declaration calling the seizure a violation of international law
  • Expressed no outrage about 25 Indian nationals confined in Iranian custody

The episode was handled with such complete silence that most Indians never knew it had happened.

For Congress, Iran Is Only a Cause When Modi Is in Power

The Congress party’s position on Iran’s conduct toward India is entirely determined by who sits in the Prime Minister’s office – not by any principle of international law, Indian sovereignty, or the welfare of Indian nationals.

When Congress was in power and Iran physically seized an Indian government ship in international waters and confined Indian crew for nearly a month – silence. Appeasement. Quiet diplomacy. No outrage. No press conferences. India-Iran relations were described as being “celebrated” even as the tanker sat in Bandar Abbas.

When Modi is in power and India maintains strategic ambiguity over a US-Israeli military operation – suddenly Congress discovers that India must “speak plainly”, must “have the courage”, must not “betray” Iran, must condemn assassinations, must defend international law.

Jairam Ramesh, who now calls Narendra Modi’s stance a “betrayal of India’s values,” was a senior Congress leader in 2013 but did not publicly question Iran’s seizure of the Indian vessel MT Desh Shanti. Likewise, Rahul Gandhi and Sonia Gandhi, who are now criticising the government’s position, did not raise similar questions when the Manmohan Singh-led UPA government had no public response to Iran detaining the ship and its 25 Indian crew members.

What Modi Has Actually Done

In contrast to Congress’s characterisation, the Modi government’s response to the Iran war has been anything but passive:

  • Modi expressed “deep concern” over the escalating conflict and called for dialogue and diplomacy on 2 March 2026.
  • In a call with Israeli PM Netanyahu, Modi called for “early cessation of hostilities” and stressed civilian safety.
  • Modi condemned the attack on the UAE and expressed solidarity with Abu Dhabi.
  • EAM Jaishankar briefed the Rajya Sabha on India’s West Asia policy on 8 March 2026.​
  • India has been focused on protecting nearly one crore Indian nationals in the Gulf region.

India has not condemned Iran, but it has also not endorsed the strikes.

The Real Question

When Iran illegally seized an Indian government ship in 2013 and held 25 Indian sailors hostage for 26 days, Congress called it diplomacy.

When Modi calls for ceasefire and civilian protection while managing the interests of one crore Indians across a war zone, Congress calls it betrayal.

The party that spent 26 days doing nothing while Iranian forces held Indian government property and Indian nationals in illegal detention has no standing to lecture anyone about defending India’s values, India’s interests, or India’s dignity in its relationship with Iran.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

DMK Minister Sekar Babu Reportedly Slaps Lift Operator On The Back After Lift Malfunctions At Swamimalai Temple

DMK Minister Sekar Babu Reportedly Slaps Lift Operator On The Back After Lift Reportedly Malfunctions At Swamimalai Temple

An incident involving P. K. Sekar Babu allegedly slapping a lift operator at the Swamimalai Swaminatha Swamy Temple has triggered controversy.

The incident reportedly occurred when the minister visited the temple near Kumbakonam to inaugurate newly installed lifts meant for the convenience of devotees.

According to reports, two lifts had been installed at the temple at a cost of ₹3.55 crore. The project was undertaken to help devotees reach the temple located on the hill more easily.

After inaugurating the lifts, Sekar Babu attempted to use one of them to travel up to the temple.

However, the lift reportedly malfunctioned when the minister entered it. Witnesses said the minister became visibly angry over the malfunction.

In the ensuing moment, the minister allegedly slapped the lift operator on the back and reprimanded him.

Following the incident, Govi Chezhiyan, who was present nearby, reportedly escorted Sekar Babu to another lift so that the group could proceed upward.

However, the second lift also reportedly stopped due to a power-related issue.

After some time, one of the lifts resumed functioning.

Sekar Babu then travelled up the hill in that lift along with Kovi Chezhiyan, Jawahirullah, and Sakkottai Anbalagan.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Leftists & Congressis Simped For New Zealand’s Jacinda Ardern To Replace Modi, Today She Has Fled Her Own Country

During the darkest days of India’s COVID-19 crisis, a familiar chorus rose from India’s journalist-activist-celebrity complex. While Indian families struggled through lockdowns and oxygen shortages, a certain class of Indian commentators found time to look longingly at New Zealand and ask: Why can’t we have her?

Rajdeep Sardesai of India Today asked his followers: “When will India get its Jacinda? Or are we stuck with our lot?”

Sumanth Raman tweeted: “Hey New Zealand, can you lend us @jacindaardern for a few months to help us deal with #COVID19?”

Rana Ayyub wrote an entire piece declaring: “New Zealand’s Prime Minister May Be the Most Effective Leader on the Planet,” gushing that “Jacinda Ardern’s leadership style, focused on empathy, isn’t just resonating with her people; it’s putting the country on track for success against the coronavirus.”

Ashok Swain thundered: “Jacinda Ardern’s moral clarity is inspiring the world – particularly when the world has been suffering from right-wing strongmen like Trump, Viktor Orban and Modi of India, whose careers thrive on illiberal, anti-Muslim rhetoric.”

William Dalrymple called her “the progressive antithesis to right-wing strongmen like Trump, Orban and Modi.”

Saba Naqvi called her “so special,” sharing images of Ardern wearing a headscarf.

Sayema wrote: “The reason why the PM of New Zealand and other voices of love wore a headscarf. And if anybody has a doubt still, you really need to first understand what love and compassion are all about.”

Prashant Bhushan connected her Labour party’s victory to a global trend, declaring: “No doubt it will soon happen in India too.”

These people did not just admire Jacinda Ardern. They held her up as a living rebuke of Narendra Modi who in their view, was too backward and too right-wing to deserve.

That Was Then. This Is Now.

Jacinda Ardern has left New Zealand.

She and her family have relocated to Sydney, Australia – spotted house-hunting in the city’s affluent northern beaches. The woman India’s liberal elite wanted as their Prime Minister has voted with her feet against the country she governed.

She is not alone. Over the past four years, the number of New Zealanders aged 30-50 emigrating has more than doubled, from 18,000 to 43,000 annually. In the year ending November 2025, nearly 122,000 people emigrated from New Zealand. Nurses, teachers, police officers, engineers, the backbone of the country, are leaving in near-record numbers. Almost 60% are heading to Australia, where median weekly income is 37% higher than in New Zealand.

New Zealand’s housing market has crashed, with Wellington prices down nearly 30% since January 2022. Unemployment has hit a decade high. The economy recorded negative growth in the year to September 2025. The country’s population growth is at its slowest in 12 years.

This is the legacy of the woman Rajdeep Sardesai & Sumanth Raman wanted India to import.

The Silence Is Deafening

Rajdeep Sardesai, who asked “When will India get its Jacinda?” – does he have any questions about why Jacinda herself no longer wants to be in New Zealand?

Rana Ayyub, who called her “the most effective leader on the planet” – does she have any curiosity about what this most effective leader’s policies did to New Zealand’s economy?

Ashok Swain, who invoked her name to attack Modi – is he writing about the 43,000 mid-career New Zealanders who are fleeing annually?

Sumanth Raman, who asked New Zealand to lend her to India – does he want her now? She is available. She is, in fact, already looking for a new home.

The answer, of course, is no. None of them are writing about this. None of them are asking these questions. Because the Jacinda Ardern project was never about New Zealand. It was never about governance, or economic outcomes, or the welfare of actual citizens. It was a political weapon – assembled and aimed exclusively at Narendra Modi and the Indian electorate that kept returning him to power.

The moment she ceased to be useful as a weapon, she ceased to exist in their commentary.

What She Actually Left Behind

A CNN report that broke the news of Ardern’s move to Sydney also documented what Ardern’s New Zealand looks like today:

  • A family relocated to Melbourne because the father’s data engineering salary jumped 50% in Australia
  • Weekly groceries in Australia cost $267 vs $400 in New Zealand
  • Fuel and public transport 40% cheaper in Australia
  • GP visits 25% cheaper, with same-day appointments replacing week-long waits in New Zealand
  • Unemployment at 5.4% in New Zealand vs 4.2% in Australia
  • Median full-time weekly income: $912 in New Zealand vs $1,451 in Australia

This is the “most effective leadership on the planet” in action. Families selling everything they own to escape to Australia. A prime minister who governed with “empathy and moral clarity” now herself joining the exodus she presided over.

Every single leftist liberal used Ardern not to celebrate good governance, but to delegitimise Indian democracy and the Hindu nationalist voter.

They praised her headscarf. They praised her “empathy.” They praised her because she was not Modi. That was the entire content of their admiration.

And now the woman they wanted as India’s Prime Minister has abandoned the country she governed – quietly, without fanfare, without any of her Indian admirers marking the occasion with even a fraction of the energy they spent lionising her during lockdown.

India under Modi, the country these commentators called ungovernable, illiberal and anti-Muslim, is today one of the fastest-growing major economies in the world. Its citizens are not fleeing in record numbers. Its mid-career professionals are not selling their homes to move abroad for a 50% salary increase they cannot find at home.

New Zealand under Ardern, the country these same commentators held up as the ideal, is hemorrhaging its own people at near-record pace, its former Prime Minister included.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Public Access To FIRs Restricted On New TN Police Portal

Public Access To FIRs Restricted On New TN Police Portal

The recently launched website of the Tamil Nadu Police has drawn criticism from sections of the legal community after it restricted public access to First Information Reports (FIRs), allowing only specific parties connected to a case to view or download the documents.

As reported in The Hindu, under the new system, only the accused, the victim, or the complainant in a case can access the FIR through the portal. Members of the general public and third parties are no longer able to view or download FIRs from the website.

The portal has been developed as part of the CCTNS 2.0 (Crime and Criminal Tracking Network and Systems) upgrade and integrated with the Interoperable Criminal Justice System (ICJS). Through this integration, police records can be shared in real time with courts, forensic science laboratories, prisons, and prosecution departments.

Authorities say key ICJS applications such as e-Sakshya, used for digital evidence management, and e-Summon, which enables electronic service of summons, have already been implemented across the State.

Advocates Raise Accessibility Concerns

However, defence lawyers and legal practitioners have raised concerns that even advocates are unable to access FIRs through the portal.

Advocate S. Karthikeyan said the system poses practical difficulties for many citizens. According to him, individuals must register their personal details, including mobile numbers and email IDs, and create login credentials in order to access most services under CCTNS 2.0.

He argued that such requirements could disadvantage non-literate, rural, and elderly citizens, who may be forced to rely on private browsing centres to complete the registration process.

Karthikeyan also questioned whether the mandatory collection of personal data for accessing services complies with the provisions of the **Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023.

Another advocate practising before the Madras High Court, M. Palanimuthu, said that providing controlled access to advocates would benefit the justice system and save valuable court time.

He said that if advocates were given dedicated login credentials, they could interact directly with officials on behalf of clients. This would enable them to serve copies of applications to prosecutors and investigating officers, as well as communicate requests to prison authorities for inmates, including applications for medical treatment.

Palanimuthu added that electronic acknowledgement of submissions through the portal could help streamline several processes.

Some advocates also complained that documents downloaded by authorised users from the portal are often unclear, which could create complications in legal proceedings such as accident compensation claims.

Police Cite Privacy Concerns

Officials from the State Crime Records Bureau defended the new system, stating that the website was designed after detailed deliberation.

They explained that while the previous website allowed third-party access to FIRs, the facility had been withdrawn in the new portal to safeguard privacy.

According to officials, only individuals whose mobile numbers were recorded during FIR registration—the complainant, victim, or accused—are now able to retrieve the document.

They argued that making FIRs publicly accessible online could reveal sensitive details. For example, in cases involving hurt or criminal intimidation, the FIR might contain abusive words allegedly used by the accused. Similarly, in theft or robbery cases, details of household items could become publicly available.

Despite the privacy argument, some legal experts have questioned the decision to restrict access to FIRs.

Advocate Naveenkumar Murthy said that FIRs are generally considered public documents and should ordinarily be accessible to the public, except in limited cases where the victim’s identity or privacy needs to be protected.

He also pointed out that the Madras High Court had directed the State in May 2025 to implement the CCTNS 2.0 system by September 2025, noting that the rollout had already been delayed.

Murthy argued that preventing access to FIRs through the portal effectively denies the press and the public their legal right to information and access to justice.

The issue has now triggered a broader debate over how to balance privacy protections with transparency and public access to criminal records in the era of digital policing.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“Pure Veg = Upper Caste”: Indian Researcher At Dublin City University, Arpita Chakraborty, Calls Vegetarian Restaurants “Casteist”, Conveniently ‘Forgets’ Why They Don’t Eat Meat

"Pure Veg = Upper Caste": Indian Researcher At Dublin City University, Arpita Chakraborty, Calls Vegetarian Restaurants "Casteist", Conveniently 'Forgets' Why They Don't Eat Meat

An Indian postdoctoral researcher based in Ireland has sparked sharp criticism after claiming that pure vegetarian Indian restaurants in Dublin are a “code for upper caste” – a statement that has been widely called out as a deliberate misrepresentation of why millions of Indians choose vegetarianism.

Arpita Chakraborty, a Postdoctoral Researcher at the Ireland India Institute, Dublin City University, made the remarks in what appears to be a panel discussion/podcast on the Indian diaspora.

We deleted our previous post as we identified her wrongly. She is not Dr. Shazia Shaikh but Arpita Chakraborty. She is a Postdoctoral Researcher at the Ireland India Institute at Dublin City University. She says our veg restaurants in India are ‘casteist’ because upper caste are… https://t.co/YzuiDq4Lkz pic.twitter.com/hzLpeKqssi

Interestingly, she is a TISS alumna.

In her own words, “…the dominant idea, conception of when migrants are coming, they’re coming alone with a suitcase, like fresh off the boat or fresh off the airplane. But that hardly happens, right? People are already connecting on Facebook, on WhatsApp, they already are part of communities even before they arrive. And that community structure is replicating casteism. So, for example, in Dublin and I don’t know whether that is the same in other Irish cities, but in Dublin you will see pure veg Indian restaurants. That is a code for upper caste. And they are piggybacking on the whole vegan movement and sliding in very slyly. Pure veg restaurants in India are basically restaurants which cater to people who only eat vegetarian food – aka upper caste people. And it just irks me so much that it’s going on, and that we do not recognise it in the dominant popular narrative of…”

What She Conveniently Left Out

In her rush to find casteism in a restaurant menu, Chakraborty omits the single most important fact: millions of Indians are vegetarian because of a deeply held moral, spiritual, and religious conviction against killing and eating animals. This principle has existed for thousands of years, long predating any Western conversation about veganism.

Hindus, Jains, many Brahmin communities, and countless non-Brahmin Hindu families across Tamil Nadu, Gujarat, Rajasthan, and Maharashtra are vegetarian not because they want to exclude Dalits but because they do not want to participate in the killing of animals. This is ahimsa. This is a centuries-old civilisational value. To reduce it to a caste conspiracy is not scholarship. It is slander.

Furthermore, and this is the fact that completely dismantles her argument, Muslims eat at pure veg restaurants in India all the time. Anyone who has spent time in Indian cities knows this. A pure veg restaurant simply means no meat is cooked on the premises which makes it attractive to anyone who wants to be certain their food has no meat contamination, including many Muslims, Jains, and health-conscious individuals of every background. If “pure veg = upper caste,” what exactly is a Muslim doing eating there? Is he engaging in casteism too?

The “Piggybacking on Veganism” Accusation

Chakraborty goes further, accusing pure veg Indian restaurants of “piggybacking on the whole vegan movement and sliding in very slyly.” This is a remarkable charge. Indian vegetarianism predates the Western vegan movement by approximately 3,000 years. The idea that Indians in Dublin opening vegetarian restaurants are somehow opportunistically exploiting a Western trend, rather than simply continuing a millennia-old food tradition, reveals more about Chakraborty’s ideological framework than about the restaurants she is describing.

No one accuses Chinese restaurants of “sliding in slyly” by serving dishes that happen to align with Western health trends. But an Indian vegetarian restaurant? That, apparently, is a caste conspiracy.

How Is a Veg Restaurant “Encroaching” on Anyone?

There is a question that Chakraborty’s entire argument cannot answer: How exactly does a pure veg Indian restaurant in Dublin harm anyone? It is not stopping non-vegetarian restaurants from opening. It is not refusing to serve customers of any caste or background – it is simply not serving meat. Any customer who walks in gets the same menu. The only people “excluded” are those who specifically want to eat meat and they have the entire rest of Dublin’s restaurant scene available to them.

The idea that Indians choosing to eat food cooked without meat, in a country where they are a tiny minority, constitutes an act of caste oppression is so detached from reality that it would be funny, if it were not being presented as serious academic research at a European university.

The “Brown Sepoy” Problem

What Chakraborty is doing has a name. She is doing her role as the perfect brown sepoy, the Indian intellectual who gains Western academic credentials and approval by relentlessly pathologising Indian culture, Hindu traditions, and Indian social structures for a white audience that has no means or motivation to verify the claims being made.

The formula is simple: take something ordinary about Indian culture: a vegetarian restaurant, a festival, a temple practice, apply the words “caste,” “oppression,” or “exclusion,” present it to a Western panel, watch the approval roll in. The white academics nod. The grant applications get funded. The conference invitations arrive. And back home, ordinary Indians who have never eaten meat in their lives, Jain businessmen who will not harm an insect are told by a Dublin researcher that their food choices are a form of bigotry.

This is not scholarship. This is performance, performed for an audience that does not know India, by someone who has decided that her career is better served by confirming Western prejudices about India than by representing her own people honestly.

The Real Question

What drives an Indian researcher in Ireland to look at a vegetarian restaurant; an establishment that harms no one, excludes no one, and simply chooses not to cook meat, and see in it a symbol of oppression? What kind of ideological conditioning produces that reflex?

The answer is the same academic ecosystem that has spent decades teaching a generation of Indian researchers to view their own civilisation through a lens of shame, to find oppression in every tradition, and to present the most uncharitable possible interpretation of Indian culture to Western audiences hungry for confirmation that India is uniquely, irredeemably bigoted.

Arpita Chakraborty did not discover casteism in a Dublin restaurant menu. She imported a predetermined conclusion and found, as these researchers always do, exactly what she was looking for.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Meet Srinivas, The New Member To Join The “Secular” Woke Club In Tamil Nadu

Meet Srinivas: The New Member to Join the "Secular" Woke Club in Tamil Nadu

Singer Srinivas has become the latest Tamil celebrity to join the “secular” woke club, jumping into the debate over The Kerala Story 2 with a post on X criticising the filmmakers over love jihad cases, while describing Kerala and Tamil Nadu as among the most secular regions in the country.

Taking to X sharing a video of the makers of The Kerala Story 2 interacting with media persons, Srinivas wrote: “These people are the ones responsible for misinformation and manipulative story telling. Last year I landed at Delhi and the cab driver asked me ‘Aap Chennai se hai na, wahan poora Christian log hai na.’ That’s the kind of divisive mindset that prevails in the north thanks to such filmmakers and the media channels. Kerala and TN are probably the most secular people in the country. Hope the poison doesn’t reach us.”

While Srinivas is outraged that a Delhi cab driver had a misconception about Chennai, he appears unbothered by a far more serious reality – that the film documents real victims of love jihad from across India, with three court cases cited in the very interaction he likely watched, where judges themselves have recorded observations establishing the pattern in their judgments.

The video in question featured the filmmakers being cornered by media persons demanding to know why Malayali victims were not featured – ironically the same “secular” argument Srinivas is now echoing. The filmmakers responded that victims from Rajasthan, Bihar, Maharashtra and other states were brought precisely to establish this as a pan-India phenomenon, not just a Kerala issue.

Srinivas makes bold claims about secularism. Let us test it against reality.

“TN is Probably the Most Secular State” – Really?

Exhibit 1: The Da Vinci Code Ban

When Hollywood released The Da Vinci Code in 2006, the DMK government under Karunanidhi banned the film in Tamil Nadu citing ‘breach of peace’. A fictional film. Banned. By the same political establishment that Srinivas and his secular friends enthusiastically support. Where was Tamil Nadu’s legendary secularism then? If Tamil Nadu is truly secular, why did the government decide that one community’s sentiments about a work of fiction were worth suppressing free expression entirely?

Exhibit 2: The US Embassy Attack Over a YouTube Video

When an American uploaded Innocence of Muslims on YouTube in 2012, a video that had nothing to do with Tamil Nadu, India, or anyone in Chennai, a mob attacked the US Embassy on Anna Salai, one of the busiest roads in Chennai, bringing the city to a complete standstill for hours in broad daylight. Not a protest. Not a candlelight march. A violent mob attack on foreign diplomatic premises, in the heart of Chennai, over a YouTube video made by a private citizen in America.

This happened in Srinivas’ “most secular state in the country.” The same state he is now holding up as a model of enlightened coexistence. The contrast with his outrage over a cab driver’s innocent geographic confusion could not be more stark.

Exhibit 3: Kaarthigai Deepam and a Father’s Death

In Thirupparankundram, the Madras High Court passed a clear judgment permitting the lighting of Kaarthigai Deepam on the hill. The DMK government under CM MK Stalin flatly denied permission, citing fears of communal violence. Think about what that admission reveals: the Tamil Nadu government was openly acknowledging that lighting a Hindu lamp on a Hindu hill, as ordered by a court, could provoke violence and their solution was not to protect Hindu worship, but to cancel it.

A young man gave up his life for this. He could not bear the humiliation of watching his faith being denied by the government of his own state. He ended his life in protest. And Tamil Nadu’s secular celebrities, including Srinivas had nothing to say.

So yes, Tamil Nadu is so secular that its government fears communal violence if someone lights a deepam on a hill. That is the secularism Srinivas is proud of.

The Cab Driver Argument Collapses Under Its Own Weight

Srinivas is outraged that a Delhi cab driver asked him whether Chennai is full of Christians. Let us be absolutely clear: that cab driver did nothing wrong. He asked a factual question about the religious composition of a city he had presumably never visited. He was not threatening anyone. He was not inciting violence. He was not even wrong to be curious.

Now ask yourself – is there even one political party in Tamil Nadu, or anywhere in India, that does not field candidates based on the religious and caste composition of the constituency. Every single party, be it the DMK, AIADMK, Congress, or the BJP, calculates caste and religion when fielding candidates. Every election analyst discusses it openly. Every voter considers it. If asking about the religious majority of a population is “divisive,” then every political strategist in India is guilty of the same “divisive mindset.” The cab driver’s question was more honest than any election manifesto.

What “Secular” Actually Means Here

In Tamil Nadu’s entertainment industry, “secular” is not a principle. It is a password. You say it to signal which side you are on, gain acceptance in the industry, keep your career safe, and avoid being labelled “communal” – the worst thing you can be called in this ecosystem, far worse than being called dishonest, indifferent to Hindu suffering, or factually wrong.

Srinivas almost certainly knows this. He is not naive. He knows about the Thirupparankundram Deepam row. He knows about the US Embassy attack. He knows about the Da Vinci Code ban. He has chosen to ignore all of it and post a feel-good secular statement because that is what keeps you relevant in the Tamil film and music industry. It is a calculated career move dressed up as a moral stance.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Justice GR Swaminathan Slams Sr Adv Vikas Singh Representing DMK Govt In Thirupparankundram Deepathoon Contempt Case

justice gr swaminathan vikas singh deepathoon thirupparankundram dmk

A pointed exchange between Justice GR Swaminathan and Senior Advocate Vikas Singh has been recorded in a judicial order of the Madras High Court during hearings in the Thiruparankundram Deepathoon contempt proceedings.

In a common order dated 4 March 2026, Justice Swaminathan rejected objections raised by Vikas Singh regarding the maintainability of contempt petitions and made unusually direct remarks about the senior advocate’s response during the hearing.

The contempt proceedings arise from alleged non-implementation of the court’s 1 December 2025 order directing the temple administration to light the Karthigai Deepam lamp at the Deepathoon on the hillock at Thiruparankundram Murugan Temple.

Vikas Singh Challenges Maintainability

Appearing for state authorities including the Madurai Police Commissioner and the Deputy Commissioner of Police (South), Vikas Singh argued that the contempt petitions could not be heard by the single judge.

He invoked the doctrine of merger, contending that the December 1 order had already been challenged before a Division Bench and that the operative order was now that of the appellate bench.

According to Singh, once the Division Bench dealt with the matter, any contempt petition would have to be filed before that bench rather than before the single judge.

Judge Rejects Argument

Justice Swaminathan rejected the submission and held that the legal precedent cited by Singh was no longer valid.

Referring to the Supreme Court ruling in United Labour Federation v. Gagandeep Singh Bedi, the judge noted that contempt jurisdiction of a High Court does not disappear merely because its order has been affirmed in appeal.

The court observed: “It is obvious that 2020 SCC OnLine Mad 17972 cited by Shri Vikas Singh is no longer good law. The doctrine of merger will not apply when the order passed by the Single Judge is confirmed by the Division Bench.”

Justice Swaminathan added that he expected lawyers appearing before the court to rely only on valid precedents.

“I would expect the counsel appearing before me not to cite case-laws that are no longer hold good.”

“I Expected Him to Feel Sorry. Far from It.”

The order also records a pointed remark by the judge regarding the conduct of the senior advocate during the hearing.

Justice Swaminathan noted that Singh was appearing through video conferencing when the court pointed out the latest Supreme Court ruling contradicting his argument.

The judge wrote that during the exchange, someone passed a copy of the Supreme Court decision to Singh while the hearing was in progress.

Despite being shown the ruling, Singh continued to press the same submission.

Recording the episode in the order, Justice Swaminathan observed: “Shri Vikas Singh appeared through VC and even as I was pointing out to him about the latest decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, someone passed on to him a copy of it. I expected Shri Vikas Singh to feel sorry. Far from it. It is probably unlike the man.”

The judge noted that Singh nevertheless continued to argue that since the Division Bench had modified the order of the single judge, the contempt petitions could not be maintained before him.

Court says Police Resisted Implementation

Justice Swaminathan also recorded concerns that authorities had attempted to frustrate the implementation of his earlier order.

According to the court, a prohibitory order had been issued after the December 2025 judgment, which effectively prevented implementation of the direction to light the Deepam.

The judge stated that even after the prohibitory order was quashed, the police leadership in Madurai resisted implementing the court’s direction.

Warning Issued in Contempt Case

The court warned that if satisfactory responses were not filed, contempt charges would be framed against the officials concerned.

Justice Swaminathan directed that the police officers named in the proceedings remain present at the next hearing and fixed 18 March 2026 for further consideration.

In a broader caution recorded in the order, the judge also warned that even public dignitaries could be brought into the proceedings if reckless comments were made regarding the case.

“Before law all are one and no one can claim immunity merely because they happen to hold high offices.”

The matter has been adjourned for further hearing later this month.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

CM Event In Kolathur Draws Flak After Students Asked To Come To School On Sunday

CM Event In Kolathur Draws Flak After Students Asked To Come To School On Sunday

A civic infrastructure inauguration programme attended by MK Stalin in his Kolathur constituency on Sunday has drawn criticism after school students were reportedly asked to attend the event despite it being a weekly holiday.

As reported in Times of India, the Chief Minister inaugurated a series of civic infrastructure projects and welfare initiatives worth over ₹45 crore in the constituency, including a new government school building constructed under the MLA Constituency Development Fund. The building, located in Srinivasa Nagar in the Thiru Vi Ka Nagar zone, contains 14 classrooms and was built to strengthen educational infrastructure in the area.

However, the event sparked controversy after reports emerged that students were asked to come to school on Sunday to attend the inauguration ceremony.

Calling students to school on a holiday purely for a political event can placedunnecessary pressure on them. It is not clear why the children had to be present on a non-working day when the event primarily served as an official inauguration ceremony.

Several netizens also raised concerns that government functions should not disrupt students’ holidays, particularly when schools remain officially closed on Sundays.

During the event, Stalin opened several civic projects including the upgraded Murasoli Maran Park, the Kalaignar Centenary Coin Memorial, a modern library and Mudhalvar Padaippagam facility in Jawahar Nagar, and the Kolathur Modern Market complex on Paper Mills Road.

The Chief Minister also inaugurated upgraded sewage pumping stations in Kolathur and later participated in a welfare distribution programme where assistance was provided to around 3,200 Muslim beneficiaries ahead of the Ramzan season.

Despite the development announcements, the decision to bring students to school on a Sunday has drawn criticism from some quarters, who argued that children should not be made to attend events for publicity purposes during their weekly holiday.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Coimbatore: Public Health Centre Meant For Patients Used As Residence By DMK Functionary, Video Sparks Outrage

Coimbatore: Public Health Centre Meant For Patients Used As Residence By DMK Functionary, Video Sparks Outrage

A Government Primary Health Centre (PHC) in Vadavalli, Coimbatore district, has become the centre of controversy after allegations surfaced that a DMK functionary had converted part of the public health facility into his residence.

According to local reports and videos circulating on social media, Shyamsundar, who is identified as the Sub-Organiser of the DMK Engineers Wing, has allegedly been staying inside the government PHC building along with his family.

The PHC, which is meant to provide medical services to the public, was reportedly found with household items inside the premises. Residents and activists claimed that cooking vessels and beds had been placed in areas intended for medical use, raising concerns about misuse of government property meant for healthcare services.

A video that has since gone viral online shows a social activist confronting Shyamsundar about his presence in the facility. During the exchange, the activist questioned who had granted him permission to stay inside the government building.

In response, Shyamsundar can be heard saying that he had been staying there after receiving permission from a doctor associated with the health centre.

The incident has triggered criticism on social media, with several users questioning how a government medical facility could allegedly be used as a private residence and demanding action from authorities.

BJP leader Annamalai condemened this issue. On his X handle, he wrote, “The news that a person named Shyam Sundar, Deputy Organizer of the DMK Engineers’ Wing in the Vadavalli area, has converted the urban primary health center in the 36th ward area under the Coimbatore Corporation into his residence and is living there with his family exemplifies the peak of the DMK’s abuse of official authority.

Primary health centers across Tamil Nadu serve as the sole fortress safeguarding the lives of the poor, the humble, and the middle class. From maternal care to emergency treatment, people rely entirely on these facilities. If an ordinary DMK administrator dares to encroach upon even such a primary health center, it means that behind him, key DMK leaders are certainly involved.

Even as government hospitals across Tamil Nadu struggle without basic facilities, what response will Health Minister Mr. Ma. Subramaniam, who has been celebrating Deputy Chief Minister Mr. Udhayanidhi’s birthday for five years now without addressing these issues, offer to this? In 2011, the late DMK Chief Minister Karunanidhi went so far as to establish a new Land Encroachment Prevention Division, yet during his rule from 2006–2011, the people of Tamil Nadu know that DMK members were engaged in land encroachments. Under his son, Chief Minister Mr. @mkstalin
‘s administration, they have taken it a step further by descending to occupy a government-owned building outright. I strongly urge the DMK government to take strict action immediately against the DMK administrator Shyam Sundar who has encroached upon the government primary health center building, and to restore that building fully for public use.”

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Congress-DMK Ally VCK Chief Thirumavalavan Participates At Khamenei Memorial Held By TN Shia Muslim Jamaat

On 8 March 2026, Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi (VCK) president Thol. Thirumavalavan participated in a memorial event organised by the Tamil Nadu Shia Muslim Jamaat in honour of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

In a post shared on social media, Thirumavalavan said he had attended the programme and delivered a speech at the remembrance event held for Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, whom the organisers described as the leader of the Islamic Ummah and a martyr.

The memorial meeting was conducted under the auspices of the Tamil Nadu Shia Muslim Jamaat, with participants gathering to pay tribute and reflect on Khamenei’s legacy.

Speaking to the audience, he said, “On behalf of the Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi, I offer my heartfelt and brave tribute to the late leader, the martyr, Khamenei. When I received the news that he had been assassinated, I was deeply shocked. I did not know what to do, I was left bewildered. Then a call came from brother Bashir Ahmed. He said, ‘A protest march has started on Anna Salai, on Peter’s Road – where are you?’ I said, ‘I am in Chennai, I am coming right away,’ and I left immediately and joined that protest and that rally. This reminded me of when Iraqi President Saddam Hussein was assassinated, I had immediately joined a protest march with Islamic comrades on Anna Salai here.”

He continued, “There is a trend on social media of mocking and ridiculing, ‘What does Thirumavalavan have to do with this?’ Those forces, which have been conditioned to think that if there is a problem for Muslims, only Muslims should fight; if there is a problem for Dalits, only Dalits should fight, they cannot understand that anyone with democratic thinking can raise their voice for the rights and lives of Muslims. It is natural to ask – ‘Why should I condemn the assassination of the Iraqi President? Why should I condemn the assassination of Iran’s Supreme Leader, Imam Khamenei?’ There is no dispute about that. But I have not built myself into a sectarian leader. I have not made myself someone who speaks only for a particular caste or only for a particular religion. I am someone who holds the conviction that wherever injustice is committed on this earth, wherever dominance raises its head, we must raise our voice against it to the best of our ability. Iraqi President Saddam Hussein was a great hero who never knelt before American imperialism. He had the courage to say, ‘The American dollar may have value in every country of the world, but in my country, it is just paper.’ He said: ‘I need not fear you. I need not bow my head before you. There is no need for me to kneel at your feet to carry this crown.’ Even at the moment of kissing the hangman’s noose, he accepted it with a smile – that was Saddam Hussein, the great hero of Iraq. No one can deny that.”

He further said, “The courage to resist imperialism belongs not only to leftist parties or leftist countries – it also belongs to Iraq, it belongs to Iran. Those who demonstrated this are the makers of history, Saddam Hussein and Khamenei. Soviet Russia stood against American imperialism, and it broke apart. Cuba is a communist country that stood against American imperialism. Che Guevara stood against it. All of these are communists – firm in their opposition to imperialism. This is how we have studied politics. But those who believe in God, those who have spiritual faith, those who believe that ‘Allah alone is one’ – they too stand firm in opposing imperialism, just as firmly as the leftists. Presidents Saddam Hussein and Khamenei stand as witnesses before us to that fact.”

He continued, “It is on the basis that Viduthalai Chiruthaigal too will stand wherever imperialism is opposed – that is why, when not just Shia Muslims as a single faction, but the entire Islamic community as a whole stood united on Peter’s Road that day, Thirumavalavan also came and stood with them. Opposition to imperialism. Opposition to American arrogance. Opposition to American insolence. Intervening in every country. Interfering in internal affairs. Installing military bases in every country. Threatening nations of the world. As they please, in every country’s elections, getting their preferred people elected as Prime Ministers or Presidents. Creating internal disturbances and destabilising every country’s political stability under the name of ‘people’s revolution’ – all of these are the atrocities that American imperialism is committing today, with the arrogance that there is no one to question them, and the pride that there is no one to oppose them. ‘You should not buy oil from Russia. If you do, we will punish you. We will impose 50% tariffs. If you comply, we will reduce the tariffs.’ Now, permission for 30 days to buy crude oil from Russia – look at how they are puppeteering the Indian government. The courage to oppose American imperialism is not in India. It is not in the Indian Prime Minister. When we think about this, we feel nothing but deep anguish.”

He continued, “Who is he? We do not have the courage to ask – ‘By what authority do you decide from which country we should import crude oil, and with which countries we should make trade agreements?’ That courage existed in President Khamenei. It existed in President Saddam Hussein. This is the problem. The person who stood firmly against imperialism was Imam Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. This is the first reason. The second reason: He approached Israel as his born enemy, in support of Palestine. He stood firm in the conviction that Palestine is the land that must exist on the world map, not Israel, and that he would oppose it until his last breath. Based on that position, he supported armed groups fighting against Israel – that is one of the charges against him. He supported Hamas. He supported Hezbollah. He supported the Houthi organisation. He stood by them, encouraged those forces, and was a major headache for Israel. He questioned Israel’s military might, and was always a great threat to Israel. Just as he was a threat to America, he was equally a threat to Israel – that is the second reason.”

He continued, “The third reason they give: Iran is manufacturing nuclear weapons and that must be stopped. If Iran manufactures nuclear weapons, it will lead the world to destruction. Therefore, they say it is not just about protecting Israel – we must protect all nations of the world, and that is why we are conducting strikes against Iran. But there is no evidence whatsoever that Iran was manufacturing nuclear bombs. The same accusation was made against the Iraqi President too – they assassinated him, dug through every corner, searched every depth, and nowhere could they find any equipment or facility for nuclear bomb production. They could not produce any evidence. It was a completely false accusation. Uranium is used in every country in the world to generate electricity – nuclear power plants are installed everywhere. Which country does not have a nuclear power plant needed for electricity generation? Which country does not have an atomic power plant? Is it only Iran? This is how they spread slander, build public belief, and create opinion against Iran. One of the war strategies, one of the imperialist conspiracies, is to first brand the dog as a rabid dog before killing it. That is one of the strategies they use to destroy Iran – accusing it of attempting to build nuclear weapons, saying ‘we are taking this action to stop that attempt.’ These are the accusations they make. The fourth reason: Iran is one of the foremost nations in crude oil production among the world’s resource-rich countries. They intervene in that trade and commerce through American imperialism – so that Iran does not become an excessively powerful empire. The view exists that they intervene with the intent of preventing that. These are all reasons. All of them are reasons. But fundamentally, the most important reason is that he was a great personality with the courage never to kneel before imperialism. This is what we must understand. On this basis, we must understand and approach Imam Khamenei’s stand.”

He further says, “‘I can do anything. I can infiltrate any country. I can enter your home and eliminate him.’ To that same degree, in India today, we are seeing fascists possessed by religious fanaticism entering the homes of leftists and shooting them. That is how Gauri Lankesh was shot and killed. Professor Narendra Dabholkar was killed. Kalburgi was killed. They entered their homes, attacked and assassinated them and there was no one to question this fascism.

In one country, religious fanatics freely carrying weapons can enter someone’s very home and assassinate them – this situation is rampant here. That is exactly what American imperialism has now done on an international scale – becoming an international thug, taking the position: ‘I can intervene in any country in the world. I can kill any president.’ This is the greatest shame and disgrace to world civilisation. ‘You cannot choose your next Supreme Leader, I will choose him,’ he says. How is this democracy? How outrageously arrogant is this political conduct? We feel anguished wondering – are there no countries in the world to condemn this? There is not a single person to say, ‘How can you say this?’ Therefore, no matter how powerful he may be, when what he has done is an anti-democratic act – we must stand on the side of Khamenei. We must stand on the side of Imam Ali Khamenei. It is the duty of people like us to take this message to the people. Comrades said, Sadiq said, ‘Our Imam Khamenei lived like the Prophet Ali and passed away like the Prophet Husain.’ Those who are the family successors of the Prophet – they have been encountering cruelties, violence, brutalities, and assassinations for generations, for the sake of the welfare of these people, for the welfare of the Islamic community. They call this Islamic terrorism. They call this fundamentalism. It was not the Islamic community that created Bin Laden – it was American imperialism. The actions of Bin Laden have no connection to Islam. It is the product of American imperialism – he himself created it, and he himself had to face that consequence. Islam as a religion did not create anything like that. It has nurtured brotherhood. It preaches love. It preaches the magnificent principle of building a society without discrimination on a global scale. Therefore, against American imperialism that is threatening nations of the world, the righteous struggle of courageous people – we can lead that from Indian soil too. We can turn it into a people’s war. Proof of that is the massive rally held two days ago on Peter’s Road, where tens of thousands of Muslims gathered in the open – I want to place that on record here. In such a field, the field of protecting democracy and justice, Viduthalai Chiruthaigal will always stand with you as a steadfast companion. We will stand. We will stand. With that, I thank you for the opportunity, offer my brave and heartfelt tribute to Ali Khamenei, and conclude.”

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.