Home Blog Page 50

“A Dalit Cannot Easily Become CM In Tamil Nadu”: VCK Chief Thirumavalavan On Caste Reality Behind CM Speculation

“Comrades Did Not Work In Unity In Some Constituencies”, Laments VCK Chief Thirumavalavan

VCK Chief Thol. Thirumavalavan has said that despite Tamil Nadu projecting itself as the land of social justice and Periyarist politics, caste realities continue to prevent a Dalit from easily becoming Chief Minister in the state.

Speaking about speculation that sections within the AIADMK were projecting him as a potential Chief Ministerial candidate, Thirumavalavan dismissed the talk as mere gossip and said he viewed it humorously rather than politically.

“Even though Tamil Nadu politics says this is the land of social justice, says this is Periyar’s land, this is still a state that has not freed itself from caste hierarchy. Here, it is not so easy for a Dalit to simply become Chief Minister. I am someone who fully understands that,” he said.

The VCK leader said he was fully aware of the “ground reality” of Tamil Nadu politics due to his decades-long political experience.

“I have been in public life for 35 years, nearly 40 years. I have been in electoral politics for 25 years. It has been 25 years since I entered electoral politics. So I know what the ground reality is. I will not go into an imaginary life just because somebody says something,” he said.

Thirumavalavan also rejected suggestions that he was seeking power or bargaining for positions amid the post-election political developments.

“If my only desire was position, couldn’t I have stretched my hand before TVK or Congress? I have many well-wishers and friends there,” he said, adding that his party had not approached anybody seeking positions or political accommodation.

During the interaction, Thirumavalavan also revealed details of conversations involving Aadhav Arjun regarding support for the government formation process. According to him, the argument placed before him was the need to create a “secular front government” with the support of Congress, Left parties and others.

However, he made it clear that his ideological criticisms of parties and leaders had not changed despite the tactical political decision to extend support in the current political situation.

“When he said that, I told him: all these days we have criticised you saying you are a BJP-supporting party or movement… I have criticised Seeman and Vijay as children nurtured by the RSS. I have that doubt. So the criticism we made then is different, and the decision we are taking today to support them is different,” he said.

He further stated that the criticisms and assessments made earlier still remained unchanged.

“In the present crisis situation, we are supporting them. The criticisms we spoke or the assessment we made still remain exactly the same. We have no change of opinion in that,” he said.

Thirumavalavan also defended the delay in his party taking a decision on extending support, saying the VCK functioned through internal democratic consultation rather than unilateral leadership decisions.

“Our party may not be a national party. But we have our own structure. We have our own procedure. Only by following that procedure can I take a decision. I am not an autocrat. Whatever decision is taken in our party, we discuss it democratically and then take it,” he said.

Responding to a question on whether support would be reconsidered if the AIADMK extended support to the government in the future, Thirumavalavan said the matter would again be discussed within the party leadership.

“That is — AIADMK was called a corrupt party. By whom? By Vijay. AIADMK is a party that travelled with the NDA. It is a party that even today has intense friendship with the BJP,” he said.

At the same time, he added that if some individuals from the AIADMK broke away and chose to support the government, his party did not immediately see it as a problem, though the matter would still be discussed internally by the party’s high-level committee.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Vijay Once Mocked ‘Bottle-Ku Pathu Rooba’; Chaos Erupts At Mayiladuthurai TASMAC Shop After Youth Questions Extra ₹10 Charge, Gold Chain Reportedly Cut

Vijay Once Mocked ‘Bottle-Ku Pathu Rooba’; Chaos Erupts At Mayiladuthurai TASMAC Shop After Youth Questions Extra ₹10 Charge, Gold Chain Reportedly Cut

When TN CM Joseph Vijay sang the ‘bottleukku 10 rooba’ mocking DMK minister Senthil Balaji, everyone clapped. But now, the same TASMAC under Joseph Vijay government is charging that 10 rupees over again. A tense situation unfolded at a TASMAC liquor outlet in Mayiladuthurai district after a youth allegedly questioned the illegal collection of an extra ₹10 per liquor bottle at a government-run shop in Moovalur village.

According to reports, the incident took place at TASMAC shop number 5772 near Mayiladuthurai, where customers allegedly continued to be charged above the government-fixed liquor price despite recent warnings issued by the Tamil Nadu government and TASMAC administration.

A verbal altercation reportedly broke out after a youth objected to the additional charge and demanded that the extra money collected per bottle be returned.

The argument escalated further, leading to tension and commotion near the outlet. Several youths who had come to purchase liquor allegedly surrounded the shop and engaged in heated arguments with the employees.

The TASMAC outlet was temporarily shut down following the confrontation before reopening nearly half an hour later after the situation calmed down.

Police later reached the spot and began an inquiry into the incident.

Tamil Janam reported that during the altercation, one of the TASMAC employees allegedly grabbed and cut the gold chain worn by the youth involved in the argument. However, the News Tamil report focused primarily on the dispute over the extra ₹10 collection and the resulting commotion, without specifically mentioning the chain-cutting allegation.

Videos related to the incident have since gone viral on social media.

The controversy comes days after Chief Minister Joseph Vijay announced action against irregularities in TASMAC operations, including the closure of 717 liquor outlets located near schools, temples, bus stands and crowded public areas.

The TASMAC administration had also warned that strict action would be taken against employees and supervisors if liquor bottles were sold above the officially fixed price.

Despite those warnings, allegations of TASMAC shops collecting an additional ₹10 per bottle reportedly continue in several rural areas.

Reports also pointed to a similar incident that allegedly took place about a week earlier at a TASMAC outlet in the Akkur Mukkoodu area of Tharangambadi taluk, where customers accused staff of illegally collecting excess charges per bottle.

Police are continuing their investigation into the latest Mayiladuthurai incident.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

MIT Sloan Educated Lehmann Bros Fame Ultra Intellectual Pro Max DMK’s Pannaiyaar PTR’s ‘Reflection’ Note Sounds More Like Him Praising Himself For 4 Pages

ptr madurai palanivel thiagarajan

Former DMK minister PTR Palanivel Thiagarajan on Monday, 18 May 2026, shared what he described as “A long note, after a lot of reflection, and before a short break…”, but the four-page document quickly drew attention for reading less like a reflective post-defeat introspection and more like an elaborate self-curated legacy statement packed with self-praise, achievement claims and political branding.

The lengthy note, released after his defeat in the 2026 Assembly election from Madurai Central, begins with PTR claiming he entered politics in 2016 with “3 personal motivations” and reiterating that he had originally intended to leave public life after ten years.

However, what follows is not so much a meditation on political failure or voter rejection as a sweeping catalogue of accomplishments, reforms, “historic” achievements and repeated assertions of personal impact across government, party organisation and constituency work.

At one point, PTR declared that he had “brought more change in two years than in any twenty years before,” while discussing his tenure as Finance Minister.

Elsewhere, he claimed responsibility for delivering “the best Fiscal improvement in the history of Tamil Nadu,” describing it as “unprecedented.”

The ‘reflection’ repeatedly shifts into résumé mode, with long lists of projects, governance reforms, advisory committees, CSR initiatives, IT reforms, AI platforms, global conferences, infrastructure projects and electoral campaign management operations.

In the section titled “For the DMK,” PTR praised his own role in building the DMK IT Wing, writing that he had helped create “the youngest and most qualified new wing of the party at the time” and claiming that the party’s coalition victories in 2019 and 2021 were supported through “online dominance.”

The self-congratulatory tone became even more pronounced in the sections detailing his ministerial record, where he highlighted everything from GST Council interventions to digital governance systems, welfare delivery architecture and Tamil computing initiatives.

Then, he described the Tamil Virtual Academy as “the best performing entity in the TN Govt.”

Even while discussing his election defeat, PTR framed the loss in a manner that still centered heavily around his own performance and principles.

“I must confess that I had not imagined losing the election, based on the work I had done,” he wrote, before adding that “one cannot go more than 500 meters in any part of my constituency without finding some evidence of my impact.”

Though he admitted he had underestimated the scale of TVK’s rise and the changing political climate, the note continued to frame the defeat through the lens of anti-incumbency and evolving electoral trends rather than deep political self-examination.

PTR also took indirect aim at rival candidates by alleging that TVK candidate Madhar Badhurudeen had “apparently purposely filed wrong information” in his affidavit and further alleged that the ADMK candidate had omitted details regarding companies in asset disclosures.

At another point, PTR emphasized that he was “happy” to have lost to a candidate “who did not pay cash for votes,” while simultaneously claiming that another candidate had paid “1,000 per vote by a hefty margin.”

The document repeatedly returned to themes of personal integrity, technocratic competence and historical contribution, while offering relatively little emotional vulnerability or introspection about why voters rejected him despite his high-profile ministerial image.

The note only comes across as “self-mythologising,” as it resembles a political performance appraisal written by the politician himself rather than a sincere reflection after electoral defeat.

The final section titled “A short break” further reinforced the sense that the note was intended as a pause-before-comeback narrative rather than a closing chapter.

PTR wrote that he was “adapting to the reality” of not being an elected representative “for a while,” before ending the note with the dramatic declaration:

“I shall return – recharged and refreshed!”

Only positive aspect of the ‘reflection’ is PTR acknowledging that he had failed to foresee TVK securing around 35% vote share and admitting that “change is relentless, and those who cannot adapt become irrelevant.”

Still, the dominant impression left by the four-page note was not one of humility after defeat, but of a politician carefully curating his own legacy while preparing the ground for a future political return.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Hindu Munnani Stage Protest Against DMK Scion Udhayanidhi Stalin Over ‘Eradicate Sanatanam’ Remarks In Assembly

Hindu Munnani Stage Protests Against DMK Scion Udhayanidhi Stalin Over ‘Eradicate Sanatanam’ Remarks In Assembly

Members of Hindu Munnani staged a protest in the Power House area of Coimbatore condemning Opposition Leader Udhayanidhi Stalin over his remarks regarding Sanatan Dharma during the confidence vote of the TVK government in the Tamil Nadu Assembly.

Udhayanidhi Stalin, while speaking during the majority confidence motion for the Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam government, stated that “Sanatanam should be eradicated,” triggering opposition from several groups and sections of the public.

Hindu organisations and protesters stated that Udhayanidhi Stalin repeatedly targeted Hinduism despite speaking about secularism and accused him of making remarks specifically aimed at the Hindu faith.

In response, Hindu Munnani state president Kadeswara Subramaniam announced statewide protests condemning Udhayanidhi Stalin, stating that demonstrations would be organised in major cities across Tamil Nadu on Sunday.

Following that announcement, Hindu Munnani’s Coimbatore division organised a protest at the Power House junction, where demonstrators gathered carrying placards and raising slogans against the DMK leader.

Participants in the protest stated that Udhayanidhi Stalin had consistently spoken against Hindu beliefs and traditions whenever addressing public platforms.

The protestors also referred to an earlier controversy in which Udhayanidhi Stalin, while participating in a private event, had compared Sanatan Dharma to diseases like dengue and malaria and said it should be eradicated. That statement had triggered nationwide political controversy and multiple legal complaints from different groups across the country.

Protesters argued that despite the earlier cases still being under investigation, Udhayanidhi Stalin had once again repeated similar remarks inside the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly, which they described as an institution expected to uphold secular principles.

According to reports, the latest remarks created strong reactions across multiple sections of society and led to fresh demonstrations by Hindu organisations.

Large numbers of Hindu Munnani cadres and supporters reportedly participated in the Coimbatore protest, continuing their agitation against Udhayanidhi Stalin and demanding action over his comments.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Two Cases Filed Against Dravidianist Ponraj Over Alleged ‘Prostitutes’ Remark About TVK Women Supporters

Dravidianist Ponraj Calls TVK Women Supporters 'Prostitutes', Refuses To Apologise/Withdraw Remarks

Two separate criminal cases have now been registered against Ponraj Vellaichamy, who heads the Abdul Kalam Vision India Movement, over allegations that he made defamatory and obscene remarks against women office-bearers and women cadres of Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam.

The cases were registered following a complaint earlier lodged by Chief Minister Joseph Vijay during the Assembly election period.

Ponraj Vellaichamy, who runs the Abdul Kalam Vision India Movement and also presents himself as a political consultant, had triggered controversy during the election campaign after giving an interview to a YouTube channel before polling day.

During that interview, remarks allegedly made by him about women associated with TVK drew widespread criticism and quickly became a major political controversy.

In an interview to a private YouTube channel, Ponraj made controversial statements targeting Vijay’s fan base. He said“One very big truth that I have come to know is this – Tamil Nadu is an educated state. Tamil Nadu has a high literacy rate. Tamil Nadu is a state renowned for educational attainment. Tamil Nadu has the highest Gross Enrolment Ratio in all of India. The Chief Minister has been conducting event after event, celebrating Tamil Nadu as an educationally excellent state. But in this same Tamil Nadu – we must actually thank Vijay for revealing to the world that such an illiterate mob exists here. What a mob of illiterates! A mob gone completely out of control. An unrestrained, shameless mob. Women saying ‘I don’t need my husband – I only want Vijay.’ A prostitute mob. Women saying ‘We will marry Vijay anna – even if he is our anna (elder brother), we will still be his anna, we will be his younger sister, we will be his elder sister, we will be his wife’ – such a crowd of prostitutes, a mob of illiterates filled with such fans exists here. For exposing this to the world, we must come and applaud Vijay.”

The interview clip was subsequently circulated extensively across websites and social media platforms, further escalating the issue.

At the time, Vijay, then serving as the president of TVK before becoming Chief Minister, publicly condemned Ponraj Vellaichamy’s remarks and demanded immediate police action.

Vijay had also posted about the issue on his social media accounts and later personally visited the office of the Director General of Police to submit a formal complaint.

According to reports, the then Additional Director General of Police (Law and Order) met Vijay at the DGP office and received the complaint. Vijay reportedly insisted that immediate legal action be taken, particularly because the Model Code of Conduct was in force during the election period.

However, despite the complaint, no immediate action was reportedly taken for some time.

Now, after TVK formed the government and while the inquiry into the earlier complaint was still pending, police have registered two separate cases in different jurisdictions.

One case has been registered by the Cyber Crime wing of the Greater Chennai Police.

Another case has been registered at the Pudhunagar police station in Cuddalore district.

Police sources stated that the cases relate to allegations that Ponraj Vellaichamy made obscene and defamatory remarks targeting women functionaries and women supporters of TVK.

With two FIRs now registered in separate locations, police officials said further action would be taken after consultations with legal experts regarding the next course of investigation and proceedings.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

‘Can Hurt Religious Sentiments Of Hindu Community’, Says Allahabad High Court On Non-Veg Waste Thrown By Muslim Men In River Ganga During Iftar

'Can Hurt Religious Sentiments Of Hindu Community', Says Allahabad High Court On Non-Veg Waste Thrown By Muslim Men In River Ganga During Iftar

The Allahabad High Court has observed that throwing non-vegetarian food waste into the river Ganga could hurt the religious sentiments of the Hindu community while granting bail to several Muslim men accused in an Iftar gathering case in Varanasi, as reported in Bar and Bench.

Justice Rajiv Lochan Shukla made the observation on 15 May 2026 while granting bail to five of the 14 Muslim men booked for allegedly organising a Roza Iftar gathering on a boat in the Ganga in March.

“The present case involves members of the Muslim community having a Roza Iftar party, and during the said Iftar party, while partaking of food, non-vegetarian food is said to have been consumed by the members of the Muslim community, who are then alleged to have thrown the remains into the River Ganges. This fact in the dispassionate opinion of the Court could rightly be said to hurt religious sentiments of the Hindu community,” the Court said.

At the same time, the Court noted that the accused and their families had expressed regret over the incident and said their remorse could be considered while deciding the bail applications.

It observed that not only the accused, but also their families, had expressed sorrow for the “pain that had been caused to the society at large.”

“This Court further understands that while facing prosecution in a criminal case, specific acceptance of the crime cannot be made by a person swearing an affidavit on behalf of the person, who has been incarcerated and while considering grant of bail an admission to the crime alleged is not warranted. However, the affidavits that have been filed in support of the bail application before the Court as well as the submissions of the Learned counsel for the applicants show genuine remorse for the actions attributed to the applicants,” the Court stated.

Court Questions Boatman’s Extortion Allegation

The High Court also noted that the offences originally invoked against the accused did not carry punishment exceeding seven years.

While examining the prosecution case, the Court expressed doubt over allegations made by the boatman that the accused had forcibly taken control of his boat.

“It would be sufficient to note here that before registration of the case, the said boatman had not come forward to lodge any report or make any complaint regarding the extortion meted out to him. In the prima facie opinion of the Court, the delay by boatman Anil Sahni in coming forward with the allegations of extortion creates a suspicion on his story,” the Court observed.

Taking note of the fact that the accused had remained in custody since March 17 and had shown remorse, Justice Shukla granted bail to five of the 14 accused men.

Separate Bail Order For Three More Accused

On the same day, Justice Jitendra Kumar Sinha granted bail to three additional accused persons through a separate order.

“The applicants have been languishing in jail since 17.03.2026 and they have undertaken to file affidavit before the learned Court concerned and the concerned police station that they will not indulge in/repeat similar activities in future,” Justice Sinha said in the order.

FIR Filed Over Chicken Biryani Allegation

The case originated from a First Information Report filed on the complaint of Rajat Jaiswal, city unit president of the Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha in Varanasi.

According to the FIR, the accused men consumed chicken biryani during the Iftar gathering and allegedly threw the food remains into the Ganga, thereby hurting religious sentiments.

Initially, police registered offences under Sections 298, 299, 196(1)(B), 270, 279 and 223(B) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, along with Section 24 of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974.

The invoked BNS provisions related to defiling a place of worship, deliberate acts intended to outrage religious feelings, promoting enmity, public nuisance, fouling public water sources and disobedience of lawful public orders.

Police later added more serious offences, including Section 308(5) BNS dealing with extortion under threat of death or grievous hurt, after boat owners alleged that the accused had forcibly taken the boat.

The accused were also booked under Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, which concerns publication or transmission of allegedly obscene electronic material.

Advocate Raghuvansh Misra appeared for the accused persons, while Additional Advocate General Anoop Trivedi, along with advocates Shashank Tripathi and Nitesh Srivastava, represented the State government.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Surat Court Orders Criminal Case Against Left-Leaning Director Anurag Kashyap Over Hateful Remarks Against Brahmins

After Spewing Hate Against Brahmins, Anurag Kashyap Offers Hollow Apology

A court in Surat has ordered the registration of a criminal case against filmmaker and actor Anurag Kashyap over his social media remarks concerning the Brahmin community.

The order was passed on Saturday, 16 May 2026, by the court of Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC) A S Jani, which partly allowed a private complaint filed by advocate and Vishva Hindu Parishad leader Kamlesh Raval, as reported in The Print.

The court observed that there was reason to believe the social media content had been made viral by the accused in a manner that allegedly defamed a particular community.

Based on the complaint, the court directed police to register a case against Kashyap under sections 196, 352 and 353(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. These provisions relate respectively to promoting enmity between groups, intentional insult intended to provoke breach of peace, and circulating false information.

According to the complaint, Kashyap had made “objectionable” remarks on X targeting the Brahmin community. The complainant, who belongs to the Brahmin community, alleged that the filmmaker’s posts amounted to defamation of the entire community.

The complaint further alleged that Kashyap’s reply to another social media user objecting to his earlier comments was also offensive and intended to insult Brahmins collectively.

As per the complaint, the controversy began after the All India Brahman Samaj objected on April 16 last year to the trailer release of the Hindi film Phule. The complainant alleged that Kashyap reacted by posting comments on X denigrating the Brahmin community and continued making similar remarks while responding to criticism online.

In the complaint submitted before the court, Raval argued that the posts could potentially create hostility between communities and castes. He also contended that Kashyap, being a public figure involved in cinema, wielded significant influence over audiences across age groups.

The complaint additionally referred to an earlier social media post allegedly made by Kashyap on 8 January 2020, in which he had reportedly posted objectionable remarks against Hindus and accused the Union government of being “casteist” and possessing a “criminal mentality.”

According to Raval, multiple summons had been issued to Kashyap during the proceedings, but the filmmaker allegedly failed to appear before the court. He claimed that a non-bailable warrant had subsequently been issued against Kashyap after repeated non-compliance.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“He Made Kolathur Like Singapore, But Those Worthless Voters Rejected Him”, Says DMK MLA Anitha Radhakrishnan

DMK Minister Anitha Radhakrishnan’s Nomination Put On Hold Over 10th Pass Claim

Anitha Radhakrishnan has sparked controversy after making remarks against voters in the Kolathur constituency following M. K. Stalin’s electoral defeat there in the recent Tamil Nadu Assembly election.

Speaking at a public event, Anitha Radhakrishnan said the DMK had passed a resolution urging Stalin to contest the upcoming Trichy East by-election, while also praising the development work allegedly carried out in Kolathur under his leadership.

“In the Trichy election, we have today morning passed a resolution that our Thalapathy must contest. Do you know what our own constituency was like? He had transformed it to look just like Singapore. But those worthless voters…can you even bear to think of them?” he said.

The remarks quickly triggered criticism from political opponents and social media users, with clips of the speech widely circulating online.

According to reports, Anitha Radhakrishnan claimed that Stalin had significantly transformed Kolathur through infrastructure development, road works and civic improvements, but alleged that voters still chose not to support the DMK despite those efforts.

During the speech, the DMK MLA also reportedly challenged members of Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam to contest against the DMK in Tiruchendur, asserting confidence that the ruling party alliance would prevail.

The controversy emerged in the backdrop of the Trichy East Assembly by-election, which became necessary after Chief Minister Joseph Vijay contested and won from two constituencies before opting to retain Perambur, thereby vacating Trichy East.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“Illegal Immigration Is Not A Terrorist Act”: Supreme Court Grants Bail To Bangladeshi Accused In NIA Case

“Illegal Immigration Is Not A Terrorist Act”: Supreme Court Grants Bail To Bangladeshi Accused In NIA Case

The Supreme Court on 9 May 2026 observed that mere illegal infiltration into India by Bangladeshi nationals does not amount to a terrorist act, while granting bail to a Bangladeshi man arrested by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) in Bengaluru in 2023 over allegations linked to forged documents and facilitation of illegal immigration, as reported in Times of India.

A bench comprising Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi made the observation while hearing the bail plea of Amol Chandra Das alias Sujib, who was arrested by the NIA in November 2023. Das had allegedly been living in Bengaluru for around 10 years using forged documents and was accused of helping Bangladeshi nationals illegally enter India.

Additional Solicitor General SD Sanjay opposed the bail plea and argued that although other accused persons in the case had already been granted bail, Das was allegedly part of a syndicate engaged in trans-national trafficking of Bangladeshis into India using forged documents.

Sanjay told the court that the accused was not entitled to bail due to the nature of the allegations against him.

During the hearing, Justice Joymalya Bagchi remarked, “Illegal immigration is not a terrorist act. Just because they have travelled across border without valid documents or no documents, it does not become a terrorist act without any other overt action that would qualify as terror acts.”

Chief Justice Surya Kant also observed, “India shares a porous border with Bangladesh. There are a large number of Bangladeshis staying in India despite immigrating illegally.”

The Supreme Court subsequently granted bail to Das, while directing him to report once every week before the Bengaluru unit of the NIA. The bench also instructed the counter-terror agency to verify the place where the accused would be staying after release.

The Karnataka High Court had earlier rejected Das’s bail plea. While refusing relief, the High Court had observed that material on record allegedly showed the creation of Aadhaar documents in Karnataka and Assam on the same day.

The High Court had stated, “Appellant is a Bangladeshi and material on record clearly discloses with regard to the alleged creation of document of Aadhaar card on the same day at Karnataka as well as Assam, and on perusal of the same, it discloses insertion of photo and obtaining the Aadhaar card and passport is also obtained based on those documents and travelled five times to Bangladesh.”

Accepting the prosecution’s argument that the accused could abscond if released on bail, the Karnataka High Court had rejected his plea.

The issue of illegal immigration by Bangladeshi nationals had also figured prominently in the BJP’s election campaign, particularly in West Bengal, where the party had alleged that “ghuispaithiyas” or infiltrators posed a threat to the country’s economy and national security. The party on Friday reiterated its commitment to fulfilling its poll promises on the issue.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Two Gana Singers Hacked To Death By Six-Member Gang In Front Of Friend’s Family In Kancheepuram

Six Murdered In One Day Raising Concerns About Deteriorating Law And Order

Two young gana singers were hacked to death by a six-member gang that allegedly stormed into a house near Manimangalam in Kancheepuram during the early hours of Sunday in what police suspect to be an attack linked to previous enmity, as reported in The New Indian Express.

According to police, the victims were identified as Bharath (25) and Seenu (24), both residents of Varadharajapuram near Padappai. The two had reportedly returned after performing at a concert near Padappai on Saturday night and were staying at the house of their friend Lokesh in Ammanambakkam when the attack took place.

Police said Lokesh was living in the house along with his parents, Mohan (45) and Sangeetha, and his younger sister Kerin at the time of the incident.

Investigators said a six-member gang arrived at the location on three two-wheelers with their faces concealed using helmets and masks. The attackers allegedly barged into the house after breaking open the door.

According to police, the gang initially attempted to attack Lokesh. However, Lokesh reportedly managed to escape after raising an alarm. When his father Mohan tried to intervene and stop the assailants, he sustained injuries during the attack.

Police said the gang then turned towards Bharath and Seenu, who were inside the house, and attacked them using sickles and machetes before fleeing from the scene.

Bharath reportedly died inside the house itself, while Seenu collapsed near the entrance in a pool of blood.

Following information about the incident, personnel from the Tamil Nadu Police attached to Manimangalam police station rushed to the spot, secured the area and shifted the bodies to Tambaram Government Hospital for postmortem examination.

Police stated that neither Bharath nor Seenu had any pending criminal cases against them. However, investigators were examining whether the victims had links with persons involved in criminal activities as part of the probe into the killings.

A case has been registered, and police said efforts were under way to identify and trace the six suspects involved in the double murder.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.