Home Blog Page 364

Court-Ordered Demolition Of Maduranthakam Saneeswaran Temple Leaves Devotees In Tears

Maduranthakam Saneeswaran Temple

Devotees and local residents were left deeply saddened after temples constructed on government land in the Mettupalayam area near Maduranthakam were demolished following a court directive. The temple administrator also ensured that the idols were safely taken into custody.

The sannidhis, dedicated to deities such as Saneeswaran, Easwaran, Amman, Ayyappan, and Vinayagar, had been maintained by 55-year-old Murugaiyan.

The legal dispute began when Raja, a social activist from Sothupakkam, filed a petition in the Madras High Court, claiming that the temples were unauthorized structures built on public land. About six months ago, the court directed the revenue department to take action and remove the encroachments.

Subsequently, officials from the Maduranthakam revenue department issued multiple notices to Murugaiyan, urging him to comply with the court’s order and clear the site.

In response, Murugaiyan voluntarily dismantled the temples during the night and ensured the idols were preserved safely. When devotees arrived the following day, they were heartbroken to find the temples no longer standing and left the site in sorrow.

(With inputs from Dinamalar)

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Tamil Nadu BJP Chief Nainar Nagenthiran Slams DMK Govt After Viral Video Shows Illegal Liquor Sale In Mayiladuthurai

Nainar Nagenthiran dmk bjp

Tamil Nadu BJP president Nainar Nagenthiran has launched a strong criticism against the DMK government following the circulation of a viral video of allegedly selling illegal liquor that has sparked outrage across the state. The footage allegedly shows individuals openly purchasing illegal liquor using GPay on farmland in Mayiladuthurai. The incident surfaced shortly after the suspension of Sundaresan, Deputy Superintendent of Police of the District Prohibition Enforcement Wing.

Sundaresan, who had taken charge of the prohibition wing in November last year, had led a relentless campaign against illicit liquor trade. His tenure saw the closure of 23 unauthorized TASMAC outlets and the booking of over 1,200 offenders, leading to more than 700 arrests. His firm actions had earned him widespread public appreciation, prompting concerns that his suspension may be politically motivated and aimed at silencing honest enforcement.

Taking to his official X account, Nainar Nagenthiran posted a fiery response, stating, “A video has been released showing illicit liquor being sold in Mayiladuthurai immediately after the suspension of Sundaresan, the Deputy Superintendent of Police, District Prohibition Enforcement Wing. Did the @arivalayam government suspend an honest officer with false accusations specifically to facilitate such rampant illegal liquor sales with digital transactions in broad daylight, in public? Does Davidson Devasirvatham, Additional Director General of Police, aware of this illegal liquor trade?”

He went on to question the government’s motives, asked, “Today it’s black-market liquor sales, what’s next? Is it the grand opening of the 23 illegal bars that was shut down by Sundaresan? As long as this Dravidian Model government, which promotes social justice on stages but harasses honest police officers, secretly encourages illegal liquor sales, and aims only to destroy law and order, remains in power, there will be no bright future for Tamil Nadu!”

 

Subscribe to our TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram channels and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Special Ops Season 2 Review: Kay Kay Menon Performance Is Fire But Prakash Raj’s Cringe & Preachy Propaganda Make You Tired

The much-anticipated second season of Special Ops lands with a thud, failing to match even the basic thrills of its earlier installments. There are positive reviews floating everywhere and there is a truth farther from this.

What started as a taut espionage thriller in Season 1 and even a fairly well-made Season 1.5, unravels into an overblown, incoherent sequel that drowns in its own excess. Season 2 has a storyline of AI, cyberwarfare, international missions (one might want to think of “unknown men”). But there are unnecessary additions in the form of propaganda and preaching that is shoved down the viewers’ throats as if to say, we have the main story going on but this side story also has to be added to please our bosses.

Warning – Spoilers ahead

Direction & Screenplay: Confused and Cluttered

The direction is uninspired, and the screenplay feels stitched together from a patchwork of unrelated ideas. What should have been a tight techno-thriller quickly devolves into a bloated soapbox lecture laced with jingoism, bizarre subplots, and cringe-worthy attempts at emotional manipulation. The pacing suffers immensely, and none of the seven episodes manage to deliver real suspense or narrative payoff. Whatever worked in Season 1 is absent here.

Acting: One Man Army

Kay Kay Menon is the only standout, delivering a dignified and intense performance as R&AW officer Himmat Singh. The rest of the Indian cast is average, the foreign actors are wooden, and Vinay Pathak is criminally underutilized. Farooq’s constant smirking, limp love angle, and overused screentime are plain annoying.

The villain, played by Tahir Bhasin, is solid to some extent but the way they build up his character just falls like a fizzled-out balloon, all of a sudden. He is shown to be a great fighter MMA expert who can down a champion with a single punch. But his end happens so suddenly and at the hands of someone who has even worse footwork and defence skills.

Prakash Raj’s Arc: Deranged and Dumb

Coming to the elaichi in the kheer or that rogue clove in the biryani that ruins a perfect bite – Prakash Raj. Cast as a bitter, disgruntled ex-bureaucrat (an R&AW handler in fact), he plays a man so enraged by the RBI sanctioning a Gujarati-run bank (clearly modeled on Nirav Modi’s saga) that he decides the rational response is… to blow up the Ministry of Defence! This character is not just laughably written but absurdly cast. It feels less like a performance and more like Prakash Raj simply playing his usual ranting self from social media and TV interviews/debates. Supposedly a retired top official with access to sensitive intelligence, he acts like a petulant man-child whose sulking turns to terrorism because one bank account was frozen and he couldn’t arrange money for his wife’s surgery and because of which she passes. His backstory is riddled with inconsistencies: a son martyred in Kargil (which automatically entitles him to lifelong military healthcare), other child/children settled abroad who could easily support him, yet he acts as if he’s been wronged by the nation itself. The final touch? Mughal-era portraits on his bedroom walls.

This Jignesh Dholakia character has a ‘Mota Bhai’ supporter who helps the fugitive that he is, peppering conversations with chants of “Jai Shri Krishna” – it is not clear what this was intended to portray. Did the director really want to take a dig at the Gujratis and given the Mota Bhai reference, at Union Home Minister Amit Shah himself? Did he want to prove that criminals are Hindus, those who chant names of deities every second of their lives? To add to the whole thing – Prakash Raj’s plot was not even part of the main one – totally unconnected. It’s not just lazy writing -pure, plain manufactured, agenda-driven farce. Reel Prakash Raj is every bit as pompous, hypocritical, and dumb as the real one.

Despite Himmat Singh telling him, trying to convince him that he is in the middle of a crisis, Prakash Raj’s character keeps throwing tantrums all through the episodes.

Action: Painfully Bad

The action choreography is downright pathetic. Sequences lack intensity, logic, and realism – they are just lazy. Trained soldiers fall like dominoes in the very first episode to a mercenary group. In one climax, two agents scale a dam and blow up a server room in under 15 minutes under the watch of trained guards. The Sudheer-MMA fighter boxing scene is so poorly done, it feels like school theatre.

Fighting is extremely slow, as if the show is hinting at you to watch it in 1.5x. Even kids at a Karate school can do better action than what we saw in S2.

Technical Nonsense: AI, Cybersecurity & WTF Moments

The show desperately tries to appear tech-savvy but ends up embarrassing itself. It throws around jargon like MITM attacks, IP spoofing, the cyber guy just connects to the “Dark Web through what seems like some app or messenger called “Dark Hub”. Then there’s Dr Bhargav, an “AI genius” who somehow doubles as India’s top cybersecurity expert – logic be damned – he has only 4-5 dialogues in the entire season – till episode 6 he keeps repeating the same 2 sentences and then in the final 2 episodes he preaches about patriotism. Add to this his imagination of a nuclear blast is AI-generated or was it pathetic CGI? Gosh!
In the final episode, we also get to see two pathetic CGI wolves who appear out of nowhere to attack 2 special agents who are looking to capture Dholakia. But guess what, these wolves are outrun by the 2 agents!
In yet another disappointment, there is a bomb blast scene which fails even basic CGI criteria.

Other Waste Of Time Subplots

Not sure why another character named Ruhani is present in the story. She is caught by her husband as she is to head into an op. She does nothing qualitative in the series, just accompanies the other agent Farooq in the boat and does something on the computer in the finale episode – that’s it.

The love story/flirting between Dr Harminder and Farooq are another waste of time, especially if you are watching with family.

Dr Harminder’s partying in Athens for vacation is another useless subplot. So is the hawala transaction enabler Salim. He only serves on purpose – a chance for Himmat to take a dig at a Muslim, but that alone is not enough to carry the series forward.

Pakistani Asset Helping At Crucial Moments

While the series successfully undermines the quality and intelligence of Indian agents, it also seems to cement the thought that India always needs a Pakistani to help them at crucial times. This is shown twice in the series – once to get location coordinates of India’s own agent who got kidnapped and once to get the location coordinates of the fugitive Dholakia.

Apart from these, there are several other logical inconsistencies – the less spoken about them, the better.

The message that seems apparent from this series is this – Indians are traitors, especially Hindus, they are also criminals while Muslims make for great special agents and save the day for Himmat Singh and the country. Yes, all this is imaginary, but there is absolutely no need to hammer this on to the audience.

Background Score/Music

Along with Kay Kay Menon’s acting and screen presence, the other saving grace is the music/background score that match the sentiments. Unfortunately, this is not enough to salvage the series.

Verdict

What started as smart espionage has devolved into self-parody – Special Ops 2 is a puffed up, propaganda-heavy mess.
Rating: ★☆☆☆☆ (1/5)

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Madurai Bench Of Madras High Court Bars DMK From Using OTP Verification In ‘Oraniyil Tamil Nadu’ Campaign Over Privacy Concerns

madurai bench of madras high court dmk oraniyil tamil nadu

On 21 July 2025, the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court issued a temporary injunction preventing the DMK party from using OTP (one-time password) verification messages as part of their membership campaign titled Oraniyil Tamil Nadu. This interim order comes amid concerns over data privacy and protection, which the court has deemed necessary to examine in detail.

The case was heard by a division bench comprising Justice S.M. Subramaniam and Justice A.D. Maria Clete, who noted that ‘Oraniyil Tamil Nadu’ is a door-to-door membership initiative by the DMK, a recognized political party in Tamil Nadu. Given that the campaign involves the collection of personal data from citizens, the judges acknowledged the significance of the public interest litigation (PIL), stating that it raises critical issues about citizens’ right to privacy and the current data protection framework in place.

The bench also highlighted that digital membership campaigns by political parties are a relatively new phenomenon, and the mechanisms for data storage and processing need scrutiny to uphold both privacy rights and the freedom of political association. The court emphasized the need to determine whether individuals are providing informed consent and whether such data collection practices unfairly disadvantage smaller political parties.

In response, the court restricted the DMK’s use of OTP-based verification for the enrollment drive and issued notices seeking responses from the Central government, the Tamil Nadu state government, and the DMK. The case has been adjourned for two weeks.

The PIL was filed by S. Rajkumar, a resident of T. Athikarai village in Sivaganga district. He alleged that DMK functionaries, under the guise of promoting the ‘Oraniyil Tamil Nadu’ campaign, were collecting Aadhaar numbers and other personal details, including voter ID information, from residents in his locality. Rajkumar claimed that when his family refused to provide these documents, the party workers threatened to cut off government welfare benefits, including the monthly financial assistance received by women in the household.

Furthermore, he asserted that the DMK was collecting mobile phone numbers and sending unsolicited campaign messages linked to OTP verification. Many recipients, he said, were unaware of the implications of these messages. He also alleged that individuals were being pressured to join the party under the threat of losing access to government schemes.

According to Rajkumar, the unauthorized gathering and handling of Aadhaar data by a political party violates constitutional privacy protections. He contended that private organizations, including political parties, are not legally permitted to collect Aadhaar information for purposes outside those explicitly authorized by law. Such data collection, he argued, could lead to profiling of individuals and enable targeted political campaigning, which could undermine free and fair elections.

The petitioner therefore requested that the court prohibit the DMK and its representatives from collecting Aadhaar data for any reason. He also called for the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) and the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology to launch a comprehensive investigation into the matter.

(With inputs from Times Of India)

Subscribe to our TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram channels and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Vellore: 21-Yr-Old Nargis Alleges Attempted Murder By Husband, Khaja Rafik, Over Dowry; Appears At Collectorate On Stretcher, After Husband Pushed Her Off Terrace

dowry attempted murder vellore

In a disturbing case of dowry-related violence, a young Muslim woman from Ranipet district has accused her husband and in-laws of prolonged harassment and an attempted murder, which has sparked outrage in Vellore.

The incident involves 21-year-old Nargis, daughter of Abdul Kalam, a daily-wage laborer from Melnelli village. Her marriage to Khaja Rafik, son of Sub-Inspector Baba from Sathuperi Mullai Nagar, Vellore, was arranged by their families and took place on 8 June 2023.

At the time of marriage, it is alleged that the Nargis’s family reportedly provided 30 sovereigns of gold, ₹10 lakh to cover wedding expenses, and an additional ₹1.5 lakh for purchasing a two-wheeler. Despite this, her in-laws allegedly continued to pressure her for more dowry. According to Nargis, the abuse began soon after the wedding and included both verbal and physical harassment by her husband, father-in-law Baba (a serving police sub-inspector), and mother-in-law Shakeela.

Alleged Murder Attempt

On 3 June 2025, Nargis was reportedly taken to the terrace of the house by her husband, who then pushed her off under the instigation of his father. She suffered a severe spinal injury and a fractured leg in the fall and was rushed to the hospital in critical condition.

Despite her family’s complaint to the local police, no immediate action was taken against the accused. In a desperate move to seek justice, Nargis appeared at the Vellore District Collectorate on a stretcher, brought by ambulance, and filed a petition demanding legal action. Her presence at the collectorate created a stir, drawing public attention and media coverage. Revenue Commissioner Senthil took notice of the incident and inquired about her situation.

Speaking to reporters, Nargis emotionally recounted her ordeal, saying, “My name is Nargis. I was married on 6 August 2023, to Khaja Rafi, son of SI Baba from Sozhavaram, Tiruvannamalai. Because of that only untold cruelty happened. My in-laws gave 30 gold ornaments as dowry, and the wedding expenses amounted to over ₹10 lakhs. They kept demanding more jewelry and money, asking me to go home and ask my parents. My parents had already taken loans for everything. Despite all this, they kept bothering me. I couldn’t even tell my parents because they had taken my phone away and kept locked up at home, so I wouldn’t tell anyone outside. Their relatives were also supportive of them. Since I had no one to support me, I couldn’t tell my parents and was suffering a lot. Then, suddenly, through my parents, I told them what was happening. As soon as they came to inquire, my in-laws spoke insultingly and kicked me out of the house. After that, I stayed at home for 10 months. Then, through the Jamaat (community council), I filed a complaint about being beaten and harassed, and about not being given food. After the complaint, they made us reconcile. But when I went back, my husband challenged me, saying, “Watch what I do to you, I’ll make you suffer”. I went back, but I didn’t have peace there. The same family started creating problems again, demanding dowry, goods, and other unnecessary things. Then, we came to Vellore district. In Mullai Nagar, Sathuperi Nagar, Vellore district, my father-in-law and husband found a house and made us live there. My husband, influenced by their words, unnecessarily beat and kicked me severely. He hit me with a fan rod on my body, everywhere he could. He kicked me in my chest and stomach. While I was sleeping, he would prick me with needles. He tortured me like that. Even while eating, he would put his foot on my hand and crush it. He tortured me like this, and I couldn’t tell my parents because they had snatched my phone away. My phone is still there. I couldn’t tell anyone because they had my phone. Then, on June 3rd, he would leave me alone at night and lock me in the house, so I couldn’t talk to anyone. On, 3rd June 2025, he came back from work at 10:30 PM. He asked me, “How will your parents dare to talk with mine? We should have cut you off from them long ago.” He blackmailed me with such words. He beat and kicked me so much, even after all that. I pleaded with him, “Please leave me, I won’t make this mistake again, I won’t tell my parents. They also won’t get involved in any discussions.” But he didn’t listen to me even after all my pleas and hit me so much. At that time, he went upstairs, Anna, talking to my father-in-law on the phone. While he was on the line, I asked, “I can’t live with him. What should I do?” My father-in-law replied, “As long as she’s there, this is how it will be. We can only be peaceful if she leaves.” After hearing this, as my father told me, (thinking) What else can I say beyond this he pushed me from upstairs. I was crying and pleading, but he suddenly pushed me. He was watching me from upstairs, but he didn’t respond or call the neighbors. My legs were dangling, bleeding from the pain, and my hip was broken. Both my legs were hanging down and broken. My left leg was shattered, and my right leg was half broken. They said if they had left it for a little longer, my leg would have to be amputated. My leg barely works now. The people there called an ambulance and took me to the hospital.”

According to the survivor, after she was seriously injured allegedly pushed off a terrace by her husband she was visited by her husband and father-in-law, in the hospital. Instead of showing concern for her condition, they reportedly pressured her to stay silent about the incident. The young woman claimed she was threatened with being poisoned through medical staff if she revealed the truth, and her parents were also threatened with legal consequences. Fearful for her life, she felt she had no choice but to remain silent.

After being discharged from the hospital on 22 June, she returned home and learned more about what had happened from her family. On 8 July, she filed a formal complaint at Ariyur Police Station. Despite submitting a written complaint and being made to sign blank papers, she says the police failed to conduct a thorough investigation. Instead of hearing her side in the hospital, authorities allegedly relied on statements from her husband and in-laws. She was later asked to record a video saying her in-laws prevented police from meeting her, but claims no further action was taken no follow-ups, no arrests, no questioning.

Feeling ignored and betrayed by the system, she decided to take her case directly to the district administration. She appeared at the Collectorate, in unbearable pain, ahead of a scheduled operation. Both her legs are broken, and she is suffering from spinal injuries. One leg required a bone graft. Her physical condition has left her completely dependent on others, unable to sit, stand, or even hold light objects.

Despite her condition, she was left alone and unsupported. She expressed deep anguish that those who caused her suffering have now distanced themselves. Her parents, already struggling financially, are shouldering all medical expenses. She questioned how those responsible could simply walk away from their responsibilities after causing so much harm. She insisted that not just her husband, but the entire family must be held accountable.

Subscribe to our TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram channels and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“Muslims Will Become Majority In Kerala By 2040”, Says SNDP Leader Vellappally Natesan; CPI(M) Speaks Like Muslim League

A fiery political confrontation has erupted in Kerala after Vellappally Natesan, General Secretary of the Sree Narayana Dharma Paripalana (SNDP) Yogam and prominent SNDP leader, asserted that “Muslims will become a majority in Kerala by 2040.” His comments, made on 19 July 2025 during a state-level SNDP meeting in Kottayam, sparked sharp criticism from both the Congress and its ally, the Indian Union Muslim League (IUML), who accused Natesan of fomenting communal division.

In his address at Kottayam, Natesan, notable for his influence among the Ezhava community, warned that Kerala was on the trajectory to a Muslim majority and suggested undue sway of Muslim religious leaders over state affairs: “The current situation is such that the state government should just listen to Kanthapuram and govern,” referencing Sunni cleric Kanthapuram A.P. Aboobacker Musliyar. He further claimed, “No government decision is implemented without Malappuram’s endorsement,” highlighting the demographic dominance of the Muslim-majority district.

Natesan met tough resistance from across the aisle. Opposition leader V.D. Satheesan (Congress) accused him of echoing Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan’s agenda, claiming, “[He] has echoed what the CPI(M) leaders in Kerala speak against Malappuram and what the Chief Minister had stated in Delhi… This hate speech is against the philosophy of social reformer Sree Narayana Guru.” Satheesan charged that the CPI(M) was trading secular credentials for political favor among majority communities.

The IUML, equally incensed, condemned the remarks as “brazen communal remarks” and urged government action. IUML leader P.K. Kunhalikutty emphasized that it’s the LDF’s duty “to act against individuals who exploit influential social organisations to cause communal divisions.” Abdul Hameed MLA, the party’s Malappuram secretary, demanded legal reprisals under statutes prohibiting incitement of enmity. Religious groups like the Samastha Kerala Jem-iyyathul Ulama also strongly rebuked the claim.

Caught in the crossfire is the ruling CPI(M), the primary beneficiary of Ezhava support. The party’s state secretariat rebuked divisive rhetoric, urging the SNDP to remain aligned with its foundational reformist values. “Social organisations are free to raise any issue concerning the people, but it should not create religious divisions and hate,” said a CPI(M) spokesperson. The party faces a delicate task, retaining Ezhava backing ahead of the 2026 Assembly polls while preserving its secular image amid rising communal tensions.

Natesan himself resisted retreat, responding defiantly to communal backlash: “Even if Kanthapuram ‘hurls a spear’ at me, I will not stop speaking out for social justice,” he told The New Indian Express.

Analysts note that SNDP represents the Ezhava community, around 25% of Kerala’s population, and its pivot towards identity-based politics signals shifting allegiances. Notably, Natesan’s son leads the BDJS, part of the BJP-led NDA, underscoring simmering interface between caste, religion, and electoral strategy in the state.

This political kerfuffle emerged days after the deaths of former CM V.S. Achuthanandan, who in 2022 alleged an extremist Muslim push for Kerala’s demographic dominance. In a state known for nonsectarian governance, Natesan’s predictions have reignited old anxieties and drawn non-BJP parties into a pitched battle of accusations and counter-accusations.

As Kerala braces for a potentially pivotal election next year, the unfolding saga, centered on SNDP leadership, CPI(M) positioning, and communal messaging, may redefine electoral coalitions. The state’s non-BJP coalition, invigorated by Congress and IUML criticism, now aims to cast the ruling Left front as tacit accomplices to divisive discourse.

(With inputs from India Today)

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

From Acquitting Terror Accused To Lecturing Hindus: 6 Back-To-Back Gems Of Judiciary In 1 Week

gems of judiciary india hindus court judgements

Over the past week, the judiciary has doled out such gems of judgements that would make Hindus gape in horror. Let’s examine 6 such judgements, or rather, gems of judiciary, delivered by courts in the country that could make one wonder if we really live in a democracy with a “thriving” judiciary.

Judgement 1 – Acquitted all the accused in 2006 Mumbai local train bomb blasts

On 21 July 2025, the Bombay High Court on Monday acquitted all 12 men previously convicted for the 2006 Mumbai train blasts that killed 187 people, calling the case a textbook example of investigative and prosecutorial failure, despite claims that the accused were linked to banned terror outfits like SIMI and Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba. The bench observed that the prosecution “utterly failed” to prove that the accused committed the crime and criticized the Maharashtra ATS for not even identifying the type of bombs used. The court found the evidence unreliable, confessions likely obtained under torture, and key witness testimonies lacking credibility. With this judgement, the courts proved that no one killed the 187 people.

Judgement 2 – A tainted judge, Yashwant Varma, is still “Justice Varma”

In a striking courtroom exchange on 21 July 2025, Chief Justice of India BR Gavai reprimanded Advocate Mathews J Nedumpara for referring to Delhi High Court judge Yashwant Varma, embroiled in a cash recovery controversy, simply as “Varma.” Nedumpara, seeking urgent listing of his petition demanding an FIR against Justice Varma, was interrupted by CJI Gavai, who insisted, “He is still Justice Varma. How do you address him? Have some decorum. You are referring to a learned judge. He is still a judge of the Court.” Nedumpara replied, “I don’t think that greatness can apply to him. Matter has to be listed.” CJI snapped back, “Don’t dictate to the Court.” The clash highlighted the judiciary’s internal contradiction, insisting on ceremonial respect for a judge under serious scrutiny. Despite allegations and a pending writ filed by Justice Varma himself, the Court remained firm on maintaining titles and decorum, even as Nedumpara argued that “an FIR has to be registered.”

Judgement 3 – Preventing release of Udaipur Files movie

The Supreme Court on 21 July 2025 extended its stay on the release of the film Udaipur Files, effectively halting its release despite the Central government’s approval of six mandated cuts. A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymala Bagchi ruled that the stay would continue until Thursday, demanding that the filmmakers implement the Centre’s revisions, including removal of dialogues, a name change, and deletion of a scene, before considering release. The Court’s repeated intervention is seen to amount to suppressing artistic expression, particularly as the Centre, after expert review, had accepted the film with changes. While Solicitor General Tushar Mehta warned that further curbs could infringe on the filmmaker’s constitutional rights under Article 19(1)(a), the Court allowed petitioners to file objections to the Centre’s order itself. Despite meeting regulatory conditions, the film remains blocked, raising serious concerns about preemptive censorship and judicial overreach into certified artistic content.

Judgement 4 – Quashed FIRs against Indians sheltering foreign Tablighi Jamaat members during COVID lockdown

On 18 July 2025, the Delhi High Court quashed 16 FIRs against 70 Indian nationals accused of sheltering 190 foreign Tablighi Jamaat members during the 2020 COVID-19 lockdown. The court ruled that there was no evidence the accused violated lockdown rules or knowingly spread the virus. It held that the charges under IPC Sections 188, 269, and 270, the Epidemic Diseases Act, and the Disaster Management Act lacked legal basis, noting the absence of proof that any accused were COVID-positive or had defied official orders. The court further observed that the accused were stranded due to the sudden lockdown and had no means to leave the mosques. Despite serious allegations and earlier claims by authorities linking the Markaz gathering to the virus’s spread, the court concluded that no prima facie case was made out, describing the charges as exaggerated and unsupported by evidence. All cases were dismissed, effectively absolving the accused.

Judgement 5 – Told Hindus how to worship at Tirumala temple

On 21 July 2025, the Supreme Court declined to hear a writ petition seeking a direction to the Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams (TTD) to use only indigenous cow milk for Lord Venkatesh’s worship at Tirupati. A bench of Justices M.M. Sundresh and N. Kotiswar Singh expressed disinterest in the plea, prompting the petitioner to withdraw it. Justice Sundresh remarked, “There are much more important issues than this. The true love for God lies in serving fellow living beings, and not in these things.” When the petitioner cited Agamashastras differentiating cow types, Justice Sundresh responded, “A cow is a cow,” and added, “God is the same for everybody, human beings and others also.” When told it was an essential religious practice, the judge replied, “Any ritual you do is an indication for your love of God, nothing beyond,” and quipped, “Now you will say, the Tirupati laddu has to be indigenous.”

Judgement 6 – Cannot have Nama Sankeerthanam sessions at home without Collector nod

The Madras High Court barred the use of a residential property in Chromepet for Nama Sankeerthanam sessions unless prior permission is obtained from the Chengalpattu Collector. Justice N. Anand Venkatesh issued the order while hearing a plea from resident Prakash Ramachandran, who alleged that his neighbor allowed the Global Organisation for Divinity (GOD) to conduct devotional chanting, disturbing others. The respondents defended the sessions, citing spiritual benefits and Article 25 rights. However, the judge said, “The same will apply here too. Except the change in the name of God, all other things are the same. How can you have Nama Sankeerthanam without Collector’s nod?” Emphasizing public peace, he added, “Peace is the best prayer and silence is the greatest prayer. The day people realise this truth, they will not disturb others by indulging in loud and noisy ways of praying to God.” The Chitlapakkam police inspector was directed to enforce the order.

(Based on the tweet of Nupur J Sharma)

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Communist Party Once Punished V.S. Achuthanandan For Supporting India During India-China War, Now Offers Him “Red Salute” In Death

The Communist Party is facing intense criticism and accusations of hypocrisy after offering condolences and a symbolic red salute to the late Comrade V.S. Achuthanandan, the iconic Communist leader and former Chief Minister of Kerala, who passed away on 21 July 2025 at the age of 101.

Achuthanandan was a founding figure of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) and the last surviving member among the 32 leaders who famously broke away from the CPI during the historic 1964 national council meeting. The split occurred because the CPI leadership supported China during the 1962 Indo-China war, an alignment that deeply divided the party.

At the time, many CPI leaders went so far as to oppose organizing blood donation camps for Indian soldiers. In stark contrast, Achuthanandan stood against this pro-China stance not once, but twice. His defiance came at a personal cost he was physically assaulted, demoted, and eventually removed from the party’s Central Committee.

Yet, now, the same CPI that once sidelined him for his patriotism has taken to social media to declare, “CPI mourns the loss of Comrade VS Achuthanandan,” sparking widespread backlash for what critics see as a shameless and revisionist gesture.

Who Was V.S. Achuthanandan?

V.S. Achuthanandan began his political journey as a trade union activist, deeply involved in workers’ and land rights movements. He played a prominent role in the historic Punnapra-Vayalar uprising and went on to become one of the most beloved and influential leaders of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) in Kerala, maintaining strong grassroots support throughout his political career. He also served as the Chief Minister of Kerala and was widely regarded as the face of the CPM in the state for decades.

A Nationalist Voice Within the Communist Ranks And the Price He Paid

During the 1962 Sino-Indian war, while the Communist Party of India (CPI) leaned heavily in favor of China, V.S. Achuthanandan stood out by taking a position that, though patriotic by today’s standards, was considered “anti-party” at the time. His support for Indian soldiers during a time of national crisis led to severe internal repercussions within the party.

At just 39 years of age and already a Central Committee member, Achuthanandan was imprisoned in Thiruvananthapuram Central Jail along with other CPI leaders, many of whom had been arrested by the Indian government due to the party’s open support for China during the war. While behind bars, he proposed a small but meaningful gesture, that jailed party members donate blood for Indian soldiers and contribute their saved rations toward the national defense fund. This suggestion was made during a routine party meeting inside the jail.

However, the proposal met immediate resistance. O.J. Joseph, the jail committee convener who would later serve in the Rajya Sabha, firmly rejected the idea. Determined to push the initiative forward, Achuthanandan raised the matter again in the next meeting. A heated debate ensued, eventually escalating into a scuffle between two factions those supporting Achuthanandan and those aligned with Joseph.

The incident didn’t stay confined within prison walls. K. Anirudhan, a fellow inmate who would later become a Member of Parliament, informed the jail warden, and news of the altercation soon reached the press. Senior Communist leaders, including Jyoti Basu, were alerted. E.M.S. Namboodiripad, one of the top figures in the party, directed K.P.R. Gopalan to investigate. As tensions rose, Achuthanandan eventually withdrew the proposal.

Yet, the controversy didn’t end there. After his release in 1965, a party worker filed a formal complaint against him for “anti-party activities.” An internal inquiry committee found him guilty, accusing him of acting contrary to the party’s ideological line. By December of that year, the Kerala state committee ratified the decision to demote him from the central leadership to a branch-level position. He was transferred to the Alappuzha district secretariat, where he spent a year in relative political isolation.

Commenting on the disciplinary action, senior Kerala CPM leader M.M. Lawrance said, “Achuthanandan acted on his own without party approval. By supporting the government, which, at the time, was cracking down on the Communist movement, he violated party discipline.”

In hindsight, Achuthanandan’s stance was one of principled nationalism. But within the rigid ideological framework of the CPI during the Cold War, his patriotic impulse came at a steep personal and political cost.

Despite this, he was elected to the Kerala Legislative Assembly multiple times – in 1967, 1970, 1991, 2001, 2006, 2011, and 2016 and served as the Leader of the Opposition thrice. Achuthanandan was also Chief Minister from 2006 to 2011. He remained a Politburo member from 1985 until his removal in 2009, when internal party disputes came to a head. Even in 2015, on the Alappuzha conference, the party passed a resolution branding him a “comrade with an anti-party mindset.”

Subscribe to our TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram channels and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Madras High Court Calls Dravidianist Filmmaker Vetrimaaran-Backed ‘Bad Girl’ Film As Child Pornography, Asks Child Rights Body And Women’s Commission To Take Action Against Such Films

vetrimaaran bad girl madurai bench of madras high court varsha bharath

In a strong indictment of the teaser of the controversial film Bad Girl, the Madras High Court has termed the video as containing “child pornography” and directed the Union Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology to ensure its removal from YouTube within a month. The court further directed the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) and the National Commission for Women (NCW) to monitor the issue and take appropriate action under existing child protection laws.

The judgment was delivered by Justice P. Dhanabal filed by three citizens who alleged that the teaser of Bad Girl, released on January 26, 2025, promotes child sexual exploitation and violates multiple Indian laws including the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act and the Information Technology Act.

Court’s Observations on Teaser

Justice Dhanabal, after reviewing the content presented by the petitioners, stated that, “The content of the teaser of the Tamil movie ‘Bad Girl’ contains child pornography and the content discloses exploitation of children (school students shown), depicted in a sexual manner.”

He emphasized that such content directly harms the well-being of children and “spoils the minds of teenage children.” The court held that the online availability of such videos without age restriction was alarming. They said, “The pictures hosted in the YouTube can be accessed by anybody and there are no restriction to the children to access and to see the said pictures. If the children see the said contents of the videos, certainly it will
spoil the mind of the children.”

Justice Dhanabal went further to underline the State’s constitutional responsibility to safeguard children under Articles 39(f) and 45 of the Constitution of India, which mandate protection against exploitation and provision of early childhood care. He said, “It is the duty of the State to protect the children in all respects… Without social responsibility, the said obscene pictures have been uploaded in the social media. Therefore, it cannot be allowed to continue.”

He also remarked that the number of potential child victims could increase as long as the video remains available online, categorizing it as a “continuing offence.”

Directions to the Government

The High Court issued the following directives:

Union Ministry of Electronics and IT must ensure removal of the teaser from YouTube within a month.

NCPCR and NCW must investigate and take further action in accordance with law.

Notably, the Court waived the requirement to implead YouTube directly, stating, “As far as the non-impleading of the You tube platform is concerned, considering the serious nature of the issue, this Court need not wait till the impleadment of the YouTube as party to the proceedings, since the first respondent is a competent authority, he can issue notice to the concerned You tube and to take appropriate action to remove the obscene
contents and the videos.” 
where first respondent is the Union Ministry of Electronics & IT.

The Court, however, refrained from directing criminal prosecution at this stage, citing the lack of specific particulars, but clarified that the petitioners are free to approach appropriate authorities.

Background on Bad Girl Film

Bad Girl is directed by Varsha Bharath and backed by Dravidianist filmmaker Vetrimaaran in collaboration with Bollywood director Anurag Kashyap. It has courted controversy since its teaser was released, portraying a Tamil Brahmin schoolgirl engaging in behaviors that critics allege are aimed at vilifying Brahmin traditions and normalizing adolescent rebellion through sex, alcohol, and drug use. The teaser includes a scene that mimics a Brahmin religious ritual in a manner perceived to ridicule it.

The film, certified U/A by the CBFC, is scheduled for release on 5 September 2025.

Following the release of the teaser, there has been widespread backlash from social activists, the Tamil Nadu Brahmin Association (THAMBRAAS), and members of the film industry, including actress Sanam Shetty and director Mohan G Kshatriyan. THAMBRAAS has already issued a legal notice against the filmmakers, alleging defamation and cultural distortion.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

The Significance Of PM Modi Visiting Gangai Konda Cholapuram, The Capital Of Rajendra Chola The Conqueror

rajendra chola gangaikonda cholapuram

Gangai Konda Cholapuram, a modest town in the Ariyalur district of Tamil Nadu, is poised to witness historic celebrations this week. On 23rd July, the town will commemorate the birth anniversary of the great Chola emperor Rajendra Chola I, which falls on the auspicious Thiruvathirai (Ardra) Nakshatra. Additionally, this year marks the 1000th anniversary of Rajendra Chola’s victorious naval expedition to Southeast Asia—a milestone event that etched the Chola name into global maritime history. A series of celebratory events are being organized from July 23rd to 27th to honour these two monumental occasions.

Although today a quiet town, Gangai Konda Cholapuram was once the bustling imperial capital of the Chola Empire, surpassing earlier capitals like Thanjavur, Pazhayarai, and Uraiyur. Many are unaware that it served as the capital for over 250 years, longer than any other Chola city. Rajendra Chola, son of the illustrious Rajaraja Chola, shifted the capital from Thanjavur due to its overcrowding, brought on by the swelling Chola army, administrative officials, temple personnel, and civilians. Strategically, he also desired quicker access from the northern territories, which were difficult to reach due to the rivers encircling Thanjavur.

As part of this grand vision, Rajendra not only planned a new city but also sought to build a temple that matched the grandeur of his father’s Brihadeeswarar Temple in Thanjavur. Staying true to his flair for symbolism and power, he wanted the Kumbhabhishekam of the new temple to be performed with the sacred waters of the Ganges. To achieve this, he dispatched a military expedition under his general Arayan Rajarajan, which marched across the subcontinent, defeated Mahipala—the Pala king of Bengal—and brought back Ganga water to Tamil Nadu.

The Thiruvalangadu copper plates poetically record that “the Ganga water was collected in pots and carried on the backs of elephants, forming a bridge across the mighty river.” Rajendra himself travelled as far as the Godavari River to ceremoniously receive the Ganga water, which was then brought to his capital and used to consecrate the temple. He poured the sacred water into a special temple well and also built a lake named Chola Gangam, establishing it as a ‘Jala Sthambam’ (water pillar) to commemorate his spiritual and military conquest—an alternative to the typical ‘Jaya Sthambam’ (victory pillar).

Architectural Grandeur And Turbulent Past

The temple Rajendra constructed is a masterpiece of Chola architecture, now recognized as part of the UNESCO World Heritage Site “Great Living Chola Temples”. Sadly, the temple suffered immense damage from successive invasions, beginning with Malik Kafur’s raid in the 14th century, which destroyed the two-storied outer walls and the Somaskanda shrine. During the British colonial period, the temple was further desecrated: a rampart was built in the southeastern corner, the Mahamandapam dismantled, and its stones used to build a dam across the Kollidam River. The temple’s original two gopurams were also destroyed—only the lower portion of the second remains today. The current Nandi (Rishabha) at the entrance is a later addition; the original is lost.

The temple layout features a Mukha Mandapa, Mahamandapa, and Ardha Mandapa, leading to the sanctum sanctorum. These mandapas were reconstructed during the Vijayanagara and Nayaka periods. The Sri Vimana, rising 51 meters from the Upa Peeta, is slightly shorter than that of Thanjavur, a deliberate choice by Rajendra to honour his father. The hollow interior of the Vimana indicates adherence to the Makutagama architectural canon. The presiding deity, the Shivalingam, stands an imposing 3.3 meters tall, making it one of the tallest in India.

Sacred Shrines And Sculptural Brilliance

Flanking the main shrine are two sub-shrines known as South Kailayam and North Kailayam, both originally dedicated to Shiva. Today, South Kailayam lies vacant, while North Kailayam has been converted into a Devi shrine. A Ganapati shrine of later origin stands on the southwestern side. On the northern side, Rajendra constructed a shrine for Durga, a deity brought from the Chalukya kingdom. Also notable is the Simha Keni (Lion-faced Well), built by the Udayarpalayam Zamindar, adjacent to the sacred well containing Ganga water.

The temple is also renowned for its stunning sculptural panels. On the southern side, exquisite carvings of Gajalakshmi, Nritya Ganapati, Ardhanareeswara, Harihara, and Nataraja are seen. The Nataraja panel, in particular, is celebrated for the deity’s ethereal smile, unmatched in Chola art. The spot for Dakshinamurthy is now vacant, likely removed during invasions. On the rear side, panels depict Gangadhara, Lingodbhava, and Mahavishnu, while the northern side features dynamic depictions of Kalasamhara Murti, Durga, Brahma, Bhairava, and Kamadahana Murti.

At the base of the northern entrance steps lie two of the temple’s most captivating reliefs. On the right, a rare Gnana Saraswati panel portrays the goddess in a meditative pose holding a Japa Mala, notably without her veena—an iconographic rarity. Opposite is the Chandeswara Anugraha Murti, surrounded by a detailed visual narrative: the story of Visarasarma, a young devotee who offered milk to the Shivalinga against his father’s wishes. When his father disrupted the offering, Visarasarma’s stick miraculously transformed into an axe, slaying his father. Moved by his devotion, Shiva appeared and granted him the title of Chandeswara.

Each panel in the temple tells a full visual story, capturing not just divinity but the Bhakti ethos that was central to Chola spiritual life.

Revival and Contemporary Celebrations

Despite its historical and artistic significance, Gangai Konda Cholapuram remained in neglect for centuries, left to the care of the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI). In recent times, a group of local devotees initiated a cultural revival by installing a new Dwajasthambam (temple flagstaff) and conducting Kumbhabhishekam using Ganga water, mirroring the original consecration by Rajendra himself.

Now, with the birthday of Rajendra Chola and the millennial anniversary of his legendary conquest of the Srivijaya Empire, Gangai Konda Cholapuram is finally receiving the recognition it deserves. These celebrations mark not just a remembrance of the past, but a cultural and spiritual renaissance, affirming this historic site as a sacred destination for generations to come.

TS Krishnan is a Tamil scholar, historian and author.

Subscribe to our TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram channels and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.