Home Blog Page 336

Kulgam: Gunbattle With Terrorists Continues For 4th Day, Army Deploys Drones And Para Commandos Against Anti-Terror Operation

The operation against terrorists in Jammu and Kashmir’s Kulgam district entered its 4th day on 4th August as intermittent overnight firing continued in the Akhal forest area of the district.

Officials said intermittent firing and blasts continued in the forest area of the district. Joint forces, including the Army, CRPF and J&K Police, have extended the area under the CASO (Cordon & Search Operation) as officers are closely monitoring the situation.

One terrorist has been killed and another critically injured in this operation so far, while four soldiers have sustained injuries. The Army has deployed Rudra helicopters, drones and Para commandos to ensure that the hiding terrorists are unable to escape. Security forces have been carrying out aggressive operations against the terrorists in the hinterland, while the Army has been on maximum alert guarding the Line of Control (LoC) in J&K.

The elimination of three hardcore Pakistani terrorists responsible for the 22 April Pahalgam attack, in which 26 civilians were killed, is part of the aggressive operations being carried out by the joint forces. Three hardcore Pakistani terrorists, including LeT commander Suleman Shah and his two associates Abu Hamza and Jibran Bhai, responsible for the Pahalgam attack, were killed on 28 July in the higher reaches of Dachigam National Park at the foot of Mahadev mountain peak in the Harwan area of Srinagar.

The Army code-named this operation as ‘Operation Mahadev’. After the Pahalgam terror attack, the security forces are carrying out anti-terrorist operations against gun-wielding terrorists, their overground workers (OGWs) and sympathisers. Drug smugglers and drug peddlers are also on the radar of the security forces because it is believed that the funds generated by the hawala money racket and drug smuggling are finally used to sustain terrorism in the union territory. The coordinated and intelligence-backed operations of the joint forces are aimed at dismantling the ecosystem of terrorism in Jammu and Kashmir rather than focusing on just the elimination of the gun-wielding terrorists.

-IANS

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

‘If You Were A True Indian, You Wouldn’t Say This’: SC Rebukes Rahul Gandhi On Army Comments

The Supreme Court on 8 August, pulled up Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha and Congress MP Rahul Gandhi over his alleged remarks insulting the Indian Army. During the Bharat Jodo Yatra, Gandhi had allegedly said, “Chinese troops are thrashing Indian Army soldiers in Arunachal Pradesh,” referring to the 9 December 2022, face-off in the Tawang sector.

A Bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and Joymalya Bagchi expressed disapproval of Rahul Gandhi’s claim that 2,000 square kilometres of Indian territory had been occupied by China, adding that “if he were a true Indian, he would not have said all this.” “How do you know that 2,000 square kilometres of Indian territory were occupied by the Chinese? Were you there? Do you have any credible material? If you were a true Indian, you would not say all this. When there is a conflict across the order, is it unusual to have casualties on both sides?” the Justice Datta-led Bench asked senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for Rahul Gandhi.

“Whatever you have to say, why don’t you say it in the Parliament? Why do you have to say this in social media posts?” further asked the apex court. The remarks came after Singhvi argued that it would be an “unfortunate situation” if an opposition leader cannot be allowed to raise issues of national concern in the press.

The apex court agreed to examine Rahul Gandhi’s plea, which raises the issue of mandatory notice to the proposed accused at the pre-cognisance stage, and sought responses from the Uttar Pradesh government and the complainant in the matter. Further, the Justice Datta-led Bench granted interim relief to Rahul Gandhi against the summoning order issued by the Lucknow court.

The complainant, Udai Shankar Srivastava, a retired Director from the Border Roads Organisation, alleged that Gandhi’s statements were “false and baseless”, intended to “demoralise the Indian Army” and damage national morale. Earlier in May, the Allahabad High Court had dismissed Rahul Gandhi’s plea to quash the criminal defamation case, rejecting the argument that the complainant lacked the legal standing to file the case, as he was not directly named.

A single-judge Bench of Justice Subhash Vidyarthi ruled that even a third party can be considered an “aggrieved person” if they are harmed by defamatory remarks. It said, “The trial Court has rightly arrived at the decision to summon the applicant (Gandhi) to face trial for the offence under Section 500 I.P.C. after taking into consideration all the relevant facts and circumstances of the case”. Declining to exercise its inherent powers, the Allahabad High Court observed that the trial court’s summoning order dated 11 February 2025, “did not suffer from any illegality” and refused to interfere with it. Following this, Gandhi appeared before the MP-MLA court in Lucknow and secured bail on the condition of furnishing his personal bond of ₹20,000 with two sureties of the like amount.

At the same time, he also approached the Supreme Court challenging the Allahabad High Court’s order refusing to quash the defamation case against him. The trial court had earlier issued multiple summonses to Rahul Gandhi in the case, but he failed to appear.

-IANS

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Manipur: Militants Linked To Banned Outfits KCP, PREPAK Arrested In Three Districts

With ten more militants of different banned outfits arrested during the past 24 hours, combined forces of military, paramilitary and state forces intensified their counterinsurgency operation to nab the armed extremists and to recover arms and ammunition in Manipur, officials said on 4 August 2025.

A police official said that ten militants arrested in three districts Imphal West, Imphal East, Bishnupur belonged to various factions of Kangleipak Communist Party (KCP) and People’s Revolutionary Party of Kangleipak (PREPAK). Security personnel recovered pistols and various materials, including several mobile handsets, various documents, and some ammunition from the possession of the arrested militants.

The arrested militants were involved in kidnapping, firing incidents, extortion, seeking monetary demands and collection of extortion money from schools located in the Imphal valley area. The police official said that joint teams of Manipur Police, Army, Assam Rifles, Border Security Force (BSF), the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) and the Indo-Tibetan Border Police (ITBP) continued their search and counter-insurgency operations both in valley and mountainous regions.

Manipur Police have once again cautioned people against spreading rumours and fake videos and appealed to people not to believe in rumours and remain vigilant about fake videos. The veracity of any videos, audio clips, etc., can be confirmed by the Central Control Room, a police statement said. The police said that there are possibilities of many fake posts being circulated on social media. “It is hereby cautioned that uploading and circulation of such fake posts on social media would attract legal action with consequences. Further, an appeal is made to the public to return the looted arms, ammunition and explosives to the police or nearest security forces immediately,” the statement said.

Meanwhile, to further strengthen policing capabilities, the Manipur government announced to set up a new police station in the state capital, Imphal and to create 12 posts of Sub Divisional Police Officers (SDPO) across nine districts of the state. A senior police officer said that the strategic move is intended to bolster policing capabilities, improve supervision of investigation, and enhance overall law and order management in both existing and newly created districts for administrative convenience, a statement from the police headquarters said.

-IANS

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

HR&CE Cancels Auction Of Arulmigu Sivasubramaniam Thirukoil Temple Lands Following PIL; Madras High Court Closes Case

hr&ce arulmigu sivasubramaniam thirukoil hosur krishnagiri temple land auction

In a significant development, the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments (HR&CE) Department has withdrawn a controversial public auction of temple lands belonging to Arulmigu Sivasubramaniam Thirukoil in Hosur, Krishnagiri, following a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed in the Madras High Court.

The PIL was filed by BJP functionary P. Baskar, who sought a writ of certiorari to quash the impugned order dated 3 July 2025 through which the auction notice was issued and published in the Malai Murasu newspaper on 4 July 2025.

The matter came up for admission before the First Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice Sunder Mohan. Senior Counsel B. Jagannath appeared for the petitioner, while Special Government Pleader N.R.R. Arun Natarajan represented the HR&CE Department and other state respondents.

During the hearing, the state informed the court that the July auction notification had been cancelled and that, if needed, a fresh auction process would be carried out strictly in accordance with law.

Taking note of this submission, the court recorded the statement and disposed of the writ petition, thereby closing the matter. The court also clarified that since the grievance raised in the PIL has been addressed through cancellation of the impugned auction, there was no further need to pursue the petition.

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Air Quality Improves In 103 Cities As NCAP Targets Begin To Show Results

A total of 103 Indian cities, as part of the National Clean Air Programme (NCAP), have shown a reduction in particulate matter PM10 concentration in 2024-25, the government informed the Parliament on 4 August 2025.

Launched in 2019 to tackle air pollution across India, NCAP focusses on 131 “non-attainment” cities and Million Plus Cities in 24 states. The programme aimed to reduce PM10 concentrations by 20-30 per cent by 2024. Of the 103, “64 cities showed reduction in PM10 levels by more than 20 per cent and 25 of these cities have achieved a reduction of more than 40 per cent,” said Kirti Vardhan Singh, Union Minister of State in the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, in a written reply in the Lok Sabha.

“A total of 22 Cities also met the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and have PM10 concentrations less than 60 micrograms per cubic metre of air,” he added.

To address air pollution in urban areas, Singh stated that a “performance-linked grant of ₹13,036.52 crore has been provided to 130 cities during 2019-20 till date, as a critical gap funding to implement air quality improvement measures”. Further, the programme leverages the mobilisation of resources through the convergence of various schemes of the central government such as Swachh Bharat Mission (Urban), AMRUT, Smart City Mission, PM e-Bus Sewa, Sustainable Alternative Towards Affordable Transportation (SATAT), and Nagar Van Yojana, as well as the resources of state governments.

“Under NCAP, an amount of ₹5,318 crore has been provided to eight States/UTs that are part of the Indo-Gangetic plain to implement the city action plan of 41 targeted cities,” Singh said. City-specific clean air action plans are prepared by all cities to implement air quality improvement measures in their respective cities. These plans target air pollution sources such as soil and road dust, vehicular emissions, waste burning, construction and demolition activities, and industrial pollution.

Notably, ambient air quality monitoring is carried out by the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) and State Pollution Control Boards (SPCB). For this, “1,612 monitoring stations have been set up in 572 cities and four rural areas across the country,” the MoS said.

-IANS

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Kalasam Crashes From Rajagopuram At HR&CE-Administered Tenkasi Kasi Viswanathar Temple Just 4 Months After Kumbhabishekam

Rajagopuram Kalasam Collapses At Tenkasi Kasi Viswanathar Temple; Devotees Demand Probe & Quick Repair

The recent incident at the Tenkasi Kasi Viswanathar Temple, which is a Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments (HR&CE) department administered temple, where a cement kalasam (finial) from the Rajagopuram (main temple tower) came crashing down just four months after its consecration, has left devotees shocked and concerned.

The temple’s kumbabhishekam (consecration ceremony) was held in April. Now, barely a few months later, the kalasam atop the newly renovated Rajagopuram has dislodged and fallen, raising serious questions about the quality of the restoration work.

Worried devotees have demanded a thorough investigation into the construction and maintenance practices involved. Many are calling for immediate repairs and a swift replacement of the damaged kalasam, stressing that such structural failures so soon after consecration are unacceptable.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

878 Journalists Targeted Under Bangladesh’s Interim Yunus Regime, Says RRAG

New Delhi-based rights group Rights and Risks Analysis Group (RRAG) on 4 August 2025, claimed that 878 journalists were targeted over the past year under the interim government of Bangladesh, led by Chief Advisor Muhammad Yunus.

The RRAG in its report titled, ‘Bangladesh: Media Freedom Murdered By Dr Muhammad Yunus’ stated that attacks on journalists increased by 230 per cent over the past year, compared to 383 cases reported under former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina between August 2023 and July 2024.

The RRAG report, released on Monday on the occasion of one year of the fall of the Sheikh Hasina-led Awami League government, stated that Press freedom in Bangladesh has deteriorated further and 878 journalists were attacked under the interim government from August 2024 to July 2025, an increase by about 230 per cent. Giving further details of the attacks on the journalists in Bangladesh, RRAG Director Suhas Chakma stated, “The number of criminal cases filed against journalists under the Yunus regime (195 cases) during 2024-2025 increased by 558 per cent in comparison to the number of cases (35 cases) filed against journalists under Hasina during 2023-2024. While Hasina’s regime was not known to have denied any accreditation to journalists, Yunus used accreditation as an instrument to punish the journalists allegedly associated with the previous regime and denied accreditation to 167 media persons. During 2023-2024, Hasina’s regime was not known to have used the Bangladesh Financial Intelligence Unit (BFIU), anti-money laundering agency of the country, against the journalists but Yunus let loose the BFIU which issued notices to 107 journalists,” Chakma said.

He said that while 348 media persons faced acts of violence and criminal intimidation under Sheikh Hasina’s regime, mostly during the July 2024 uprising, about 431 journalists faced acts of violence and criminal intimidation under Yunus’ tenure. The RRAG report said that the situation of the media continues to deteriorate under the interim government of Bangladesh led by Yunus. On June 25 (2025), journalist Khandaker Shah Alam, a correspondent of Daily Matrijagat, was murdered at Nabinagar Upazila, in Dhaka’s northeast, in a targeted retaliation by Babul Mia, known locally as ‘Tiger Babul Dakat’ after he was released from prison, the report said.

According to the report, on 27 July (2025), the Cyber Tribunal of Dhaka issued arrest warrants against three journalists, Bangladesh Pratidin Editor Naem Nizam, its publisher Moynal Hossain Chowdhury and news portal Bangla Insider’s Chief Editor Syed Borhan Kabir under the Digital Security Act (DSA) despite a declaration by Law Adviser Asif Nazrul on 27 June (2025) that all cases under the DSA had been withdrawn. On 21 April (2025), Kongkon Karmaker was dismissed by The Daily Star as Dinajpur correspondent only because his report about the death of religious minority Bhabesh Chandra Roy was picked up by multiple Indian media outlets and India’s Ministry of External Affairs, the report added.

RRAG Director Chakma said that in order to silence the media, Yunus established ‘CA Press Wing Facts’ as the de facto censorship authority by other means, the manufacturer of the government version of the truth, and to intimidate media houses and NGOs including the Rights & Risks Analysis Group, through disinformation. The RRAG stated that it would approach the international community including the Human Rights (Joint Committee) of the United Kingdom seeking review support to the interim government of Bangladesh on governance issues and consider withdrawing bilateral support in the light of the absolute silencing of the media in the country.

-IANS

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Filmfare Editor Calls Kerala Story A ‘Shit Show’ But His Own Awards Are Bought And Bartered

filmfare editor kerala story awards national award

When The Kerala Story, a film that exposed the dark reality of religious conversions and ISIS recruitment in Kerala, won the National Award for Best Film, the Bollywood elite couldn’t handle it. Leading the charge was Filmfare editor Jitesh Pillai, who took to Instagram to throw a tantrum, calling the film “dangerously divisive,” “shoddily scripted,” and “one of the worst movies ever made.”

On his Instagram handle, Pillai wrote, “By awarding a dangerously divisive film, Kerala Story for best direction, the National awards jury sends seriously wrong signals. Forget for a moment the vicious propoganda of the film, its insidiously fake narrative, let’s look at it qualitatively. It has to be one of the worst movies ever made- it’s shoddily scripted, very poorly acted, horribly photographed and amateurishly directed. Is this the film chairman of the jury, ashutosh Gowariker with his claims of being an aesthete with a great understanding of cinema of sense and sensibility has awarded for best cinematography? And to add serious insult to injury, it’s been given best direction? I don’t know what the criterion of selection in and what year was considered? But in a year of many cinematic gems like Kathal, Balagam, Chitha, 12th fail, Aatam, All we imagine as light, Viduthalai, and so many many others, you found this arrant piece of filmmaking- Kerala Story for best direction. Slow claps. Lovers of good cinema can hang our heads in shame. This has verily been the worst blow ever and a travesty in judging cinematic excellence. To know how bad it is do watch this abomination on Z5. You’ll get a fair idea. What a con job.

P.S. Had to add RD Burman’s sholay background score to take off the bitter taste of a shit show”

The National Awards, judged by a government-appointed jury, didn’t play by the usual Bollywood pageant rules, and Pillai simply couldn’t digest it.

But here’s the irony: Filmfare Awards, the very institution Pillai represents, has long been accused of being a paid, rigged circus where trophies are handed out based on lobbying, star power, and cold hard cash, not merit.

Filmfare itself has a history of ignoring genuine talent while rewarding mediocrity, especially when it comes to films that challenge the Left-liberal narrative.

Ignored The Kashmir Files (2022): Despite being a cultural phenomenon, Filmfare snubbed it.

Snubbed Kerala Story (2023): The highest-grossing female-centric film of the year was conveniently left out of Filmfare’s nominations.

But rewarded Gangubai Kathiawadi (2023): A film that whitewashed a brothel madam as a feminist icon.

Why? Because Filmfare, like most Bollywood award shows, is not about merit – it’s about politics, lobbying, and money.

A History Of Paid Awards: Stars Speak, Filmfare Cringes

Let’s examine who’s talking. Jitesh Pillai, presiding over a platform that has been accused of selling awards, now lectures the public about “cinematic excellence.” But it’s not the public alleging corruption, it’s Bollywood insiders themselves.

Rishi Kapoor: “I Paid For My Award”

In his autobiography Khullam Khulla, Rishi Kapoor confessed to buying an award in 1973 for his debut film Bobby. While he didn’t name Filmfare explicitly, the timing and context left little to the imagination. “Someone told me, ‘You know, we can get this award, do you want it?’ I said yes… It will cost you Rs 30,000,” he wrote. “I regret it. I was a brat. I was 20 years old. It was wrong.”

And while he tried to suggest that maybe it didn’t reach the “original guys,” he admitted to getting the award.

Harshvardhan Kapoor Alleged Awards Are For Sale

Anil Kapoor’s son Harshvardhan was livid when he didn’t win the Filmfare Award for Best Debut, despite picking up two other awards that year. The trophy instead went to Diljit Dosanjh for Udta Punjab and Harshvardhan couldn’t stop venting about the perceived unfairness.

This added to the long-standing suspicion that Filmfare favors clout and camps over craft.

Aamir Khan & Imran Khan: “Commercial Awards Are A Joke”

Aamir Khan hasn’t attended a single commercial award show since the 1990s. Why? “Commercial film awards are of no value to me,” Aamir told Indian Express. His nephew Imran Khan echoed the same on a podcast: “They don’t directly tell you… they ask if you’re free on that day, and if you say yes, the award magically appears.”

Abhay Deol On Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara: “Shameless Demotion”

Despite Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara being a story about three friends, only Hrithik Roshan was nominated in the lead category. Abhay Deol and Farhan Akhtar were dumped into ‘Supporting Actor’ nominations – a blatant star power maneuver. “This was just shameless. So blatant. I boycotted the awards,” Abhay said.
“Just give the award to the biggest star, but don’t demote others.”

Amaal Mallik: “Sab Tera Got Nominated, Not Neerja?”

Singer and composer Amaal Mallik exposed the absurdity of music nominations in a scathing Facebook post. “You nominate Baaghi, an average album, but ignore Neerja, MS Dhoni, Airlift, Jugni?!”
“Why is Randeep Hooda in Sarbjit not nominated, but Aishwarya Rai is?”

Mallik’s outrage pointed to the fundamental rot: massive performances and content were being sidelined in favor of star names and soft PR.

What Jitesh Pillai Can’t Digest

The Kerala Story winning a National Award wasn’t about political propaganda, it was about a story, however controversial, being told through the lens of a director who dared to go against the grain. Whether you agree with the film or not, its success, commercially and culturally, was undeniable.

Pillai’s attack reeks of the elitist disdain of Lutyens gatekeepers who see the rise of non-conforming narratives as a threat to their carefully curated ideological bubble. But the public sees through it.

Jitesh Pillai and Filmfare have long presented themselves as arbiters of cinematic taste. But the reality is simpler: Filmfare is a glorified TV event built for TRPs, not artistic merit.

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

TN Becoming Kidney Trafficking Hub? 52 More Victims Speak Out, Network Spreads Beyond State

tn kidney trafficking scandal

In a disturbing and deeply unsettling turn in the Namakkal kidney trafficking case allegedly linked to DMK functionaries another 52 individuals have come forward to testify that they had sold their kidneys as far back as 30 years ago. What was initially thought to be a localized crime targeting powerloom wage workers and women in the Kumarapalayam area of Namakkal district now appears to be part of a vast and vicious organ trafficking network that stretches across Tamil Nadu and beyond including Tirunelveli, Bangalore, Kerala, Chennai, and hospitals near Tambaram.

Victims Speak: Stories of Desperation, Debt, and Decay

Sujata, speaking to reporters, shared how she gave up her kidney 20 years ago due to unbearable debt. She said, “It’s been 20 years since we gave it. We only gave it for ₹30 (30,000) back then. We went and asked in Kerala. There was a debt issue of ₹50,000. We went there to pay back ₹30,000 of that ₹50,000.”

Another woman, Papathi, revealed that she underwent her kidney removal at Aravind Hospital in Coimbatore two decades ago. She said, “It’s been 20 years since I gave this. Aravind Hospital in Coimbatore. They gave ₹50 (₹50,000).” When asked if she was given any documents, she simply replied, “Nothing was given.”

Forced by Abandonment and Poverty

Gandhi and Shanthi, two women who were left by their husbands, were pushed into kidney donation under extreme financial distress.

Gandhi said, “It’s been 30 years since I gave it.” When asked where the operation was done, she replied, “Kovai Medical.” When the reporter asked how much she received, she answered, “They gave us… 45 (₹45,000).” Asked why she gave her kidney, she said, “Back then, it was very difficult. My husband left me. I had two small children. I couldn’t support them. My husband took a lot of loans and left. I couldn’t pay that debt. So, in that situation, I went and gave it.” When asked through whom she approached the hospital, she said, “That lady is no more. She passed away.”

Shanthi recalled her ordeal with similar anguish, “I gave it when I was 21. It was difficult then. Difficult even for food. We were weaving in workshop, and it became debt. My husband left me unable to pay the debt. So, because I couldn’t pay the debt, I gave it for this. They only gave ₹30,000 there. They spoke about ₹30,000, but they only gave ₹20,000-₹25,000 to our hands.”

Tragedy and Death After Donation

Another victim, Bakiyammal shared how her husband succumbed to illness after donating his kidney. She said, “Only my husband gave it. He couldn’t bear the debt, so he gave his kidney. Then his body became very weak. He couldn’t bear the pain for these three years and passed away.”

Other victims echoed that they gave up their kidneys to clear debts but are now suffering long-term health consequences.

One woman said, “I gave it because of hardship. My husband passed away. It’s been 30 years since I gave it.” Asked how much she received, she said, “I gave it for one lakh.” Asked where, she replied, “In Chennai.” Pressed for the hospital name, she said, “Tambaram. If you go a little distance from Tambaram bus stand, there’s a big hospital. We went through a boy from Vepanai.” Asked about her current health, she admitted, “There’s still some pain now.”

When reporter asked another woman, “How much did you give for your kidney?” She answered, “₹30,000.” Again, she was asked, “Which hospital?” She revealed, “In Bangalore.” he asked, “Do you know which hospital in Bangalore?” She said, “Rexide… In Bangalore.” When asked, “Did you give it for debt?” she acknowledged and said, “I gave it for debt.”

Another female victim recounted her experience when questioned. When asked how much she was paid for her kidney, she replied, “₹35,000.” She said she had undergone the procedure in Tirunelveli. When the reporter asked which hospital it was, she responded, “I’ve forgotten the hospital name now. It’s been a long time.” The reporter then asked through whom she had gone to give her kidney, to which she answered, “She has passed away now, hasn’t she?” confirming that the woman who facilitated it was no longer alive. When asked if she had to submit any documents or an Aadhaar card, she replied, “They didn’t ask for anything like that back then. There was no Aadhaar card then.”

The Price of Poverty: ₹5,000 for a Kidney

Raju, another victim, lamented his ordeal as he gave it for mere ₹5,000. “I gave it in 2000. I was 40 then, now 64. It’s been 25 years. I gave it for a debt of ₹5,000. Back then, we were weaving, and there was no weaving wage. Even if we wove, the wage was only ₹200-₹300 then. So I gave it for a ₹5,000 debt.”

Pain, Disability, and Lifelong Regret

One woman explained how the surgery left her crippled, “Now I can’t weave. My hands and legs feel like they’re cramping. I can’t sit on the floor. I can only sit if it’s elevated like this. I can’t sit on the ground. Even if I go to the bathroom, I can’t sit there.”

Another woman shared her account, saying, “They gave about ₹30,000–₹40,000 for the kidney.” When asked where the procedure took place, she replied, “They gave it in Coimbatore.” When pressed further about the hospital’s name, she admitted, “I don’t know the name of that hospital.” Recalling her condition post-surgery, she said, “My body was fine then. Now it’s difficult.”

In a particularly shocking case, Kamala, an elderly woman, revealed that she had sold her kidney just six years ago. Describing the pain she continues to endure. When asked how she was taken to the hospital, she explained, “There’s a woman named Ponnayi here, along with her.” When the reporter clarified, “You went through a broker?” Kamala nodded, “They took me.” Asked about her current physical state compared to before the surgery, she replied with visible distress, “My body aches.” When the reporter asked again, “Your body aches?” she confirmed, “Yes, it aches where they took it. I can’t work easily. My hands and legs feel tired. My legs feel tingly.”

Crushed by Poverty, Crippled for Life

One elderly man, Subramani broke down while speaking to the reporter, overcome with the weight of his past. “My wife and son have lost their lives. I have seven children in Namakkal Periyar Math. I’m just stumbling here and there, that’s all. Leg pain.” The reporter gently asked, “How much did you give?” The man replied bitterly, “For just ₹20,000, nothing more.” Trying to get clarity, the reporter asked, “In which city did you give it?” “In Bangalore,” he said. “And how is your body now?” “Now I can’t sit up and get up,” he said, “Only life remains.”

Another elderly woman, Lakshmi, overwhelmed with emotion, said, “I gave it 30 years ago.”  He asked, “In which city?” “In Coimbatore,” she answered. When asked, “Why did you give your kidney?” she replied, “It was due to many difficulties, so we gave it. That’s all.” “Did you go through a broker?” the reporter questioned. “Yes, sir,” she confirmed. “Do you know the hospital?” she said softly, “It was a kidney center.” Finally, the reporter asked, “How is your body now compared to before?” Lakshmi said, “I had four surgeries. I can’t. I can’t even speak.”

These harrowing testimonials lay bare the long-running horror of organ trafficking in southern India. With more victims coming forward, the depth and geographical spread of the alleged kidney trade network are now undeniable. Many are still suffering from chronic pain, financial ruin, and physical incapacity all while the system that exploited them remains largely unpunished.

Authorities face increasing pressure to act decisively and bring justice to the voiceless victims whose bodies still bear the scars of desperation.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Dravidianist Journo Arvind Gunasekar Attempt To Buttress Congress Scion Rahul Gandhi’s Comments About Jaitley Fall Flat

It’s baffling how a so-called “neutral” journalist can use their position under the guise of balance, only to blatantly shield their preferred politicians even when they’re caught red-handed making false claims. The extent to which some in the media will stoop to defend their political favourites is truly remarkable. One such figure is pro-Congress and Dravidianist journalist Arvind Gunasekar.

At the 2025 Annual Legal Conclave, Lok Sabha Leader of Opposition and Congress MP Rahul Gandhi made a rather bizarre claim. He alleged that the late senior advocate and former Law Minister Arun Jaitley had once threatened him for opposing the farm laws. Rahul Gandhi said, “I remember when I was fighting the farm laws, Arun Jaitley ji was sent to me to threaten me. He told me “if you carry on opposing the govt, fighting the farm laws, we will have to act against you”. I looked at him and said “I don’t think you have an idea who you are talking to’”

The problem? Arun Jaitley passed away in 2019, while the farm laws were only introduced in Parliament in 2020. And now, in 2025, Rahul Gandhi claims to have been threatened by someone who was no longer alive at the time the laws were introduced. This clear contradiction was immediately pointed out and mocked widely.

However, Arvind Gunasekar, unable to bear the criticism of his political idol, rushed to his defense with a weak attempt at damage control. He tweeted that, “I think Rahul Gandhi meant Land Acquisition Act, 2015. Congress spearheaded the protests against the proposed Land Acquisition Act, 2015. Remember, then Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley urged the States to pass the similar Land Acquisition Bills in their respective Assemblies and get President assent under Article 254(2) as then BJP Government couldn’t pass the Bill in the Parliament. Rahul Gandhi said the same in 2024 too.”

But the problem with this justification is simple: Rahul Gandhi very clearly and repeatedly said “farm laws” during his speech. The Land Acquisition Act, though it may affect landowners including farmers, is not categorized as part of the “farm laws.” The act pertains to land acquisition for public purposes such as infrastructure, security, and industrial development not specifically to agricultural policy reform.

This kind of spin, aimed solely at propping up political leaders under the pretext of journalism, hasn’t gone unnoticed. Social media users were quick to call out this blatant and dishonest defense.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.