Home Blog Page 318

Supreme Court Stray Dog Ruling Brings Spotlight Back On Sardar Patel’s 1920s Municipal Drive Against Stray Dogs

sardar patel stray dog supreme court

Following the Supreme Court’s recent order to remove stray dogs from residential areas in Delhi-NCR, historical parallels have emerged from the tenure of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel as municipal president of the Ahmedabad municipality in the 1920s.

According to “Patel: A Life” by Rajmohan Gandhi, Patel oversaw a civic campaign targeting rats, stray dogs, and decrepit cattle during his term. The measures drew objections from certain Jain groups, who opposed the capture of stray dogs, and from sections of the Hindu community, who wanted him to prevent Muslims from slaughtering old cattle.

Patel reportedly told the Jains that they could “show the dogs pity by keeping them in their homes” if they opposed municipal action. To Hindus objecting to cattle slaughter, his retort was that it was Hindus themselves who sold old cattle to Muslim butchers.

The Supreme Court, in its 11 August 2025 ruling, ordered the relocation of stray dogs away from residential localities in Delhi-NCR, warning that any obstruction to the exercise would invite strict action. The order followed a spate of dog bite incidents in the capital region.

Dog lovers have been going on an overdrive comparing dogs to rapists and voicing their views against the Supreme Court order.

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“Goat, Cock Sacrifices At Thiruparankundram Hill Part Of Tradition; Record Exists For Hill Being Called Sikandar Malai”, Says DMK Govt In Madras High Court

The DMK government of Tamil Nadu asserted in the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court that the practice of sacrificing animals has long been followed at Thiruparankundram hill in Madurai.

The case originated from a Public Interest Litigation filed by Solai Kannan, the Madurai district president of the Hindu Makkal Katchi. He claimed that the ancient Subramaniya Swamy (Murugan) Temple holds ownership over Thiruparankundram hill. Referencing a ruling from the British era, he argued that key locations on the hill including the Sikandar Badusha Dargah, the flagpole in front of it, an eel tree grove, the steps leading to the Dargah, and a newly constructed mandapam are all under the temple’s jurisdiction.

Kannan further urged the court to prohibit individuals from performing animal sacrifices involving goats, cows, and chickens on the hill, and from attempting to rename or represent the hill as “Sikandar Hill.” Several other related petitions seeking various forms of relief were also submitted.

A division bench comprising Justices J. Nisha Banu and S. Srimathy considered the matter. On 24 June, Justice Nishabanu rejected all petitions, while Justice Srimati issued a separate judgment. As a result of the split verdict, the matter was escalated to a third judge, R. Vijayakumar, who took up the case on 11 August 2025.

During the hearing, the judge questioned whether there was historical or documented proof referring to the site as Sikandar Hill and if animal sacrifices were indeed a longstanding tradition there.

In response, Additional Chief Government Advocates Veera Kathiravan and Ravindran emphasized that religious practices should not be discriminated against based on caste, religion, or dietary customs. They presented records indicating that the location has been known as Sikandar Hill and that the practice of sacrificing goats and chickens has been ongoing. They also pointed to similar rituals carried out at the 18th Karupanaswamy Temple in Alagarkoil.

They concluded by stating that religious freedoms must be respected, and no one should obstruct another’s right to practice their faith. Following these arguments, the judge postponed the hearing.

(With inputs from Dinamalar)

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

LS Speaker Om Birla Forms 3-Member Panel To Investigate Allegations Against Justice Yashwant Varma

ls speaker om birla justice yashwant varma allegations investigate lok sabha

Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla on 12 August 2025 announced the constitution of a three-member committee to investigate corruption allegations against Allahabad High Court Judge Justice Yashwant Varma, following the recovery of burnt cash from his official residence in Delhi earlier this year.

Birla made the announcement after accepting a resolution signed by 146 MPs from both the ruling and Opposition benches seeking Justice Varma’s removal. The Speaker said the committee will submit its report “as soon as possible.”

The panel comprises Justice Aravind Kumar, Judge of the Supreme Court; Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, Chief Justice of the Madras High Court; and B V Acharya, Senior Advocate at the Karnataka High Court.

On 15 March 2025, burnt currency notes were recovered from the debris after a fire broke out at Justice Varma’s official residence at 30, Tughlaq Crescent in New Delhi. At the time, the judge was serving with the Delhi High Court.

Announcing the decision when the House reassembled at noon, Birla said, “I have received notice of the following resolution dated 21st July, 2025 signed by a total of 146 members of the ruling and opposition parties including Ravi Shankar Prasad and the Leader of the Opposition in the House, proposing to present a representation to the President of India for removal of Justice Yashwant Varma, a sitting Judge of the Allahabad High Court, from the office of Judge of the High Court under Section 3 of the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968 read with Article 124(4) of the Constitution of India read with Article 217 and Article 218.”

Reading from the resolution, Birla stated, “This House resolves that a petition be presented to the President for the removal of Justice Yashwant Varma of the Allahabad High Court from his office for the following misconduct.”

The resolution referred to a Supreme Court statement on the recovery of unexplained cash from the judge’s residence, as well as a report submitted by a committee appointed by the then Chief Justice of India to President Droupadi Murmu.

Quoting the resolution, Birla said, “Having independently examined the facts mentioned above and the facts available in the public domain, the circumstances surrounding the recovery and removal of burnt cash from the official premises occupied and under the control of Justice Yashwant Varma, we also independently find that the removal process under Article 124 read with Article 217 and Article 218 of the Constitution of India must be initiated in accordance with the Judges [Inquiry] Act, 1968 and the Rules made thereunder.”

He added, “Impeccable character and financial/intellectual integrity are the foundation of the trust placed by a common man in the judiciary. And that the facts of the present case which point to corruption are violative of the tenets of Article 124, Articles 217 and 218 of the Constitution of India and deserve due process and scrutiny. The Parliament must speak with one voice on the subject and send a clear message to every citizen of the country about its resolve for (zero-tolerance) towards corruption in public life.”

Birla concluded, “Finding this proposal to be in accordance with the rules, I have approved it. In accordance with sub-section 2 of section 3 of the Judges (Judges) Act, 1968, I have constituted a committee consisting of the following 3 members to examine the grounds of request for removal of Justice Yashwant Varma from the post.”

(With inputs from Indian Express)

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

After Global Humiliation Following Operation Sindoor, Pakistan Launches Its First English International Channel ‘AsiaOne’ To Peddle Propaganda Against India

asiaone pakistan media

In the wake of setbacks on multiple fronts diplomatic, economic, and reputational – Pakistan appears to have intensified its propaganda strategy against India. Following Operation Sindoor, Pakistan has now ventured into international media with the launch of AsiaOne, a satellite-based English news channel, aimed at shaping global narratives in its favor.

Rather than confronting the root of its global image problem terrorism originating from within its borders Pakistan seems intent on countering facts with fiction. The new channel, launched by Pakistan365 Media Group, is headquartered in Korangi, Karachi. Despite the scale of the project, mainstream Pakistani and international media have largely ignored the development. Coverage of the launch has been limited to a few digital blogs and third-party sources.

Inside the Launch of AsiaOne

According to their LinkedIn page, AsiaOne was founded in 2015, though their YouTube bio lists the creation date as 28 June 2025.

The channel claims to be Pakistan’s first English-language international satellite news outlet and is staffed by a mix of foreign presenters, mainly from Europe, the Middle East, and Africa.

Key personnel include:

  • Naveed Qamar as News Director, formerly with TRT World

  • Mudassar Iqbal as Chief Technical Officer

Currently, AsiaOne operates out of a single office in Karachi, with no immediate plans to expand. The emphasis, they claim, is on “quality journalism” within a tight budget.

Narrative Building Through Media

Media analyst Imran Malik, in an interview with Media Bites, candidly outlined the motivation behind the channel. Though not directly referencing Operation Sindoor, he implied that global media representation of Pakistan’s stance has been poor. He emphasized the lack of English-language news channels in the country that could deliver Pakistan’s viewpoint on international platforms.

Malik explained that previous attempts like Dawn News, Express 24/7, Indus News, and PTV World all failed due to poor planning, lack of funds, and unprofessionalism. With AsiaOne, he believes a fresh attempt is being made to challenge India’s dominance in the global English-language media space. He also suggested that the channel could benefit figures like Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, who are fluent in English and well-positioned to promote their narratives to a global audience. Malik praised the visual quality and international staffing of the new channel, calling it a step forward for Pakistan’s media ambitions.

He said, “Recently, in Pakistan and internationally, there have been some incidents where Pakistan’s narrative has not been presented in a very good light to the world. And there have always been complaints about it that all the news channels in Pakistan are Urdu news channels. There are no English news channels that can present Pakistan’s narrative on an international forum. In comparison, if we look at our neighboring country, there are many such channels that are in English and their narrative is easily accepted throughout the world. So, it was felt that there should be English channels in Pakistan because earlier too, English channels were launched in Pakistan. Dawn News, which is Pakistan’s biggest newspaper, launched a channel. We thought that it would be a successful model for an English news channel, but the channel that was launched in 2010 had to be shut down after only three years, and the series of English news channels once again came to an end. After that, an experiment was done by Express News, they launched a channel, and that channel also ran for about one and a half years, and after that, it was also shut down. After that, some circles tried to show Pakistan’s narrative internationally, and they tried Indus News, and PTV World, to show English transmission in other countries. There was a lack of professionalism, there were no budgets, and there was no proper planning, so they were not successful. Now, two days ago, we saw a new addition. 365 News, that channel is going to launch. Asia One English News channel has been launched, and its transmission also looks very good. Its picture is very good, and its anchors and news casters are not only from Pakistan but have also been brought from international forums. Overall, it’s a good presentation because 365 is said to be owned by a certain group, so that same group is also launching this English channel. Bilawal will benefit from this because it’s a channel of his own group, so for him, it will be a very good platform to use it because he presents his narrative in English very well throughout the world. We extend our congratulations to Asia News, Asia One.”

Anti-India Propaganda: A Common Thread

Since its launch, AsiaOne appears to have wasted no time pushing a biased, anti-India narrative under the guise of journalism. Several news segments broadcasted by the channel have been alarmingly slanted

Example 1: “Modi’s India Stands Isolated”

In one program, the channel alleged that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is facing a major diplomatic crisis, claiming he has been “publicly sidelined” by former US President Donald Trump. The segment revisits historical India-China border tensions and criticizes Modi’s outreach to the US, portraying him as strategically stranded and internationally isolated. The report also distorts Trump’s past comments to suggest strained US-India ties and claims India is reverting to a policy of “strategic autonomy” after supposed diplomatic failures.

The news segment peddles, “Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi finds himself navigating one of the toughest foreign policy tests of his tenure. Once quartered by both Beijing and Washington, Modi is now recalibrating in his position after being publicly sidelined by US President Donald Trump and cautiously reopening channels with China. It began with a warm embrace. In 2014, Modi personally hosted Chinese President Xi Jinping symbolizing hopes of economic partnership. But even as they smiled for the cameras, Chinese troops clashed with Indian forces at the border. A humiliation that left New Delhi reeling and heavily militarized in the Himalayas. Then came the United States. Modi put his political capital on the line, even campaigning alongside Donald Trump in Texas. But that bonhomie was short-lived. Now in his second term, President Trump has imposed a 50% tariff on Indian goods, citing India’s continued oil imports from Russia and calling India’s economy “dead”. He’s also equated India’s arch-rival Pakistan with New Delhi in his push for a South Asia ceasefire sparking backlash among Modi’s supporters. For Modi, the strategic gamble with the US has backfired, forcing India to look inward and once again revive an old foreign policy mantra: strategic autonomy. In other words, India is on its own. In the past week alone, Modi has spoken with Russian President Vladimir Putin, Brazil’s Lula, and is preparing for his first visit to China in 7 years. Officials say relations may never fully recover with Washington, and that India must learn to hedge its bets.” 

Example 2: “Air Crafts Shot Down”

Another segment attacked the credibility of the Indian Air Force, accusing it of fabricating claims about shooting down six Pakistani aircraft during a brief conflict in May. The report criticizes Indian Air Chief Marshal A.P. Singh for providing “no evidence” and paints Pakistan’s narrative as more credible, even alleging the downing of an Indian Rafale jet a claim India has never confirmed and no independent source has validated.

The news agency highlighted, “Three months after its brief but intense war with Pakistan, India has unveiled a new claim that it shot down six Pakistani military aircraft during the conflict in May this year. However, this statement, made by Indian Air Chief Marshall AP Singh, raises more questions on India’s military credibility and capability. India’s latest claims come exactly three months after the fighting ended, with no proof offered, no independent verification, and no answers about its own battlefield losses. The Air Chief stated, “We have at least five fighters confirmed kills and one large aircraft which could be either an elint aircraft or an AWNC aircraft which was taken out at a distance of about 300 km”. As usual and expected, Singh provided no proof of his claims. No independent source, not even India’s allies, has confirmed any aircraft loss on Pakistan’s side in the war between the two neighbors in May this year. Islamabad, for its part, has consistently rejected this claim. Conspicuously absent from the air chief’s speech was any mention of India’s own wartime losses, a topic the Indian government and senior commanders have repeatedly sidestepped. The discussion also touched upon the incident between Pakistan and India, specifically “whether or not Pakistan downed an Indian jet or in fact more than that”. A key point highlighted was “not the jet being down but why they were being down”, indicating an focus on understanding “tactical mistake which we made”. These tactical mistakes have been costly, and India’s losses in the war, including multiple fighters, have been reported by its own officials. Even Indian defense representatives have acknowledged the damage, with one stating, “India lost a lot of aircrafts. I may not agree with him that India lost so many aircrafts but I do agree that we did lose some aircraft”.Pakistan says it downed six Indian jets during the May clashes, including a French-made Rafale, a loss that was confirmed by the French air chief. India has never addressed this claim directly, even though many independent news outlets have confirmed it lost multiple aircraft during the war. For now, India’s late-breaking announcement appears to raise more questions than answers about what really happened in the skies over South Asia and what New Delhi doesn’t want to talk about.”

Example 3: “India Faces Tariffs”

A third report focuses on the economic front, alleging that steep U.S. tariffs on Indian goods imposed due to India’s oil trade with Russia are crippling key sectors like textiles and auto parts. The channel frames this as a failure of Indian diplomacy and manufacturing strategy, quoting unnamed industry insiders to paint a bleak picture of India’s economic prospects.

It went on to say, “Now Trump’s steep 50 tariffs on Indian imports threaten key sectors including textiles, jewelry and auto components. The move, aimed at penalizing India’s purchase of Russian oil, could severely disrupt India’s export growth and manufacturing ambitions. So nowadays tariff comes so is mainly affecting our manufacturing division because the tariff issue comes the cost is more than 50% increases. So the buyer demands to decrease the price and rough prices also increased. So they can mainly effect to survive the industry. It’s very difficult to run nowadays.”

AsiaOne’s domain was registered on 2 June 2025. The media outlet has launched official social media accounts on platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok, notably excluding YouTube. This digital push suggests an intent to engage younger and global audiences through viral, short-form content.

With its new English-language satellite channel, Pakistan is making a calculated entry into global media warfare. While the effort is being dressed up as an attempt to amplify underrepresented narratives, early indicators suggest AsiaOne is less about objective reporting and more about promoting state-friendly, anti-India propaganda.

By mixing polished visuals with unverified claims and selective storytelling, the channel risks becoming a mouthpiece for geopolitical narrative manipulation rather than a legitimate media voice. As disinformation continues to rise in global conflict zones, AsiaOne may become just another cog in Pakistan’s expanding propaganda machinery, replacing accountability with narrative warfare.

(This article is based on an X Thread By Sougat Chakraborty)

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Stray Dog Attacks 10 People In Vriddhachalam, Cuddalore

stray dog vriddhachalam cuddalore dog bite dmk
xr:d:DAE1NfU2Aak:6908,j:4050795529,t:23022110

Ten people, including a child, were injured after being attacked by a stray dog in Vriddhachalam on Monday, 11 August 2025.

According to local sources, the victims sustained bite injuries and were taken to a nearby hospital, where they are undergoing treatment. The incident has caused concern among residents, who have urged authorities to take immediate action to prevent similar attacks.

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Courts Across India Have Called For Tough Actions Against Stray Dogs Menace, But Stray Doggo Lovers Give A Damn

Stray Dog Menace: Madurai Bench Of Madras High Court Considers Enforcing Supreme Court’s Delhi Directive

A day after the Supreme Court ordered the immediate removal of all stray dogs from residential localities in Delhi-NCR, similar judicial interventions from High Courts across the country have come into sharper focus, underscoring a growing legal consensus that human safety must take precedence over animal rights.

The apex court, in its August 11 order, directed civic authorities in Delhi, Noida, Ghaziabad and Gurugram to pick up all stray dogs,  sterilised or unsterilised, and shift them to shelters equipped with trained personnel, sterilisation and vaccination facilities, CCTV surveillance, and helplines for bite cases. The bench of Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan warned that no stray dog should be released back onto the streets, and that any individual or organisation obstructing the exercise would face contempt proceedings. The court also barred adoption of stray dogs to prevent re-release, and told authorities to prioritise rabies vaccine availability.

The Delhi order has triggered strong reactions from dog lovers nationwide, but similar measures have been under consideration, or already in place in multiple states.

The SC order follows a series of state-level judicial interventions.

Kerala High Court (March 2024 & July 2025)

March 2024: Declared “human rights above all” while holding gram panchayats liable for attacks.

July 2025: Formed special committees to address 16 deaths and 100,000+ bites in 6 months.

Justice CS Dias observed“Stray dog attacks should be considered like wild animal attacks… humans and animals should co-exist, but not at the cost of lives.”

The court accepted the state’s proposal for an interim committee to oversee mitigation measures, but deferred euthanasia of stray dogs under the 2023 Animal Husbandry Rules until further orders. Previous observations by Justice PV Kunhikrishnan in March had also called for licensing individuals who keep stray dogs and warned that public safety must take precedence. The Kerala State Commission for Protection of Child Rights has flagged thousands of attacks in recent years, many involving children.

Allahabad High Court (July 2022)

In a suo motu PIL on a fatal dog attack in Lucknow, the bench of Justices Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Rajnish Kumar questioned why the victim’s family should not be awarded ₹10 lakh compensation, holding that municipal negligence appeared to be the cause. The court directed the Nagar Nigam to file affidavits on both compensation and compliance with stray dog safety measures, while seeking legal input from amicus curiae on the basis for such monetary relief.

Rajasthan High Court (August 2025)

A bench of Justices Kuldeep Mathur and Ravi Chirania ordered municipal bodies in Jaipur, Jodhpur and Udaipur to immediately remove stray dogs and other animals from roads, permitting criminal action against those obstructing the drive. Authorities were told to ensure minimal harm to animals and to facilitate feeding only at designated shelters. The order extends to state and national highways, where regular patrols have been mandated to keep roads free of stray animals.

Reactions From “Dog Lovers”

Here is a series of reactions from dog lovers who even went to bizzare extents of comparing dogs to rapists.

Some compared death due to dog bites/rabies to deaths due to mosquitoes.

Some even started online petitions.

Some even went to the extent of preaching to the government to take lessons from other countries.

Some political party leaders have also opined, including Rahul Gandhi.

Some have initiated protests as well.

And some have made it a BJP issue.

The Supreme Court’s latest directive, prompted by rising rabies deaths and over 35,000 reported animal bite incidents in Delhi in just six months, appears to be the most sweeping yet, with blanket bans on adoption and a hard deadline for shifting all stray dogs out of public areas.

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“Rama Cut Shambuka’s Head To Protect Varnasrama, He Committed Murder To Benefit Brahmins”, VCK Leader Vanni Arasu Spews Venom Against Hindus, Brahmins, RSS

Whenever the Dravidianist ecosystem comes together under one roof, one thing becomes glaringly obvious – truth takes a backseat to propaganda. Their so-called intellectual gatherings often become echo chambers of revisionism, where facts are bent to suit an ideological narrative. The recent Abolition of Caste conference hosted by the YouTube channel The Debate was a textbook example.

Instead of honest engagement with the realities of caste, what unfolded was an ideological theatre. Periyarists and Dravidianists who participated had little meaningful to say about caste realities – only rehashed fables, conspiracy theories, and anti-Hindu diatribes. Leading the charge was VCK State Deputy General Secretary Vanni Arasu, who, in typical fashion, took every detour possible to avoid grounded caste analysis and instead peddled a cocktail of mythology, misinformation, and political scapegoating.

He began his talk on a serious note, narrating the tragic story of a man named Pachamalai Devar, who, due to societal pressure, murdered his own daughter in Madurai for marrying outside her caste. Arasu linked this incident to the case of Kavin Selvaganesh, a Scheduled Caste youth murdered in Tirunelveli, and rightly noted how societal norms often push people to commit such heinous acts even when they internally accept the relationship.

But any intellectual honesty ended there.

Rather than expanding on real solutions or structural issues, Arasu quickly pivoted to pure fiction and ideological sermonizing. He bizarrely claimed that the roots of honor killings lie in the Ramayana, particularly in the story of Shambuka, where Lord Rama allegedly kills a lower-caste man for performing penance. This narrative already discredited and widely understood as a later interpolation was served up as historical truth, used to indict Hinduism itself as the foundational cause of caste-based violence.

Vanni Arasu said, “A very important story in the Ramayana, where is Ram is his palace hall, and let we keep the King is in the palace. A Brahmin from outside brings his child and lays him outside, saying, ‘Ram, injustice is happening in your rule.’ Ram comes out and asks what the injustice is. He says, ‘The era has become corrupt; people are fully working against our Varnasrama.’ ‘What is it?’ he asks. ‘A man is performing penance. He is not of the caste to perform penance.’ Ram asks, ‘Oh, who is he?’ The Brahmin says, ‘Go and see.’ ‘Because of that, my son died,’ he said. What he said was this: ‘A man is doing penance against the Varna and caste rules. This is against Varnasrama. Therefore, the era has become corrupt, and my son died because of that,’ he said.

As soon as he said that, Ram got on his horse and searched. The readers of Ramayana know that a man was upside down. The revolutionary Ambedkar has written about this extensively in his book, ‘Riddles in Hinduism.’ ‘Who are you?’ Ram asks. ‘My name is Shambuka,’ he replies. ‘What is your caste?’ ‘I am from a different community, a tribal community,’ he says. ‘You are doing penance. Is performing penance a principle of your caste? Is this what you should be doing?’ he asks. ‘I am doing it,’ Shambuka says. ‘It is wrong for you to do this against the principles of Varna and caste. It is unacceptable for you to act like a different caste, based on Varnasrama.’ With that, he takes his sword and cuts off his head. The story told in the Ramayana is that the blood from that cut splashed on the child, and the child came back to life.

Now, why did Ram cut off Shambuka’s head? Today, people say ‘Jai Shri Ram.’ They build such big temples for Ram. They worship Ram so much. From Modi to Amit Shah, they put forth the slogan ‘Jai Shri Ram’ all over India. As educated people, how can we listen to this story of Rama and justify such an act? So, to protect Varnasrama, whose Varnasrama? For whose benefit does Ram commit murder? He commits murder for the benefit of a Brahmin. This is what we have to understand from all this. So, if he commits murder for someone performing penance against caste to protect Varnasrama, justifying that is why honor killings for inter-caste marriages happen all through history even today. This is the continuation of the Ramayana that is happening today. The Ramayana is celebrated today. If you take any television channel, there are news stories about the Ramayana. There are movies. Big directors like Rajamouli say he is making the Ramayana in different forms. The stance of protecting Varnasrama or protecting Sanatana Dharma is being attempted to be established today on cultural, political, and judicial fronts. A government is in power to sit and decide how all this should be done. Even in movies, many films that talk about caste pride and community pride have come out today.”

To suggest that modern honor killings are a direct consequence of a disputed mythological occurrence is not only ahistorical and absurd, but also deeply intellectually dishonest. This is not activism it’s narrative building, tailor-made to appease anti-Hindu sympathizers who treat mythology as a convenient punching bag while ignoring present-day social reform within Hindu society.

As if equating Lord Ram to a symbol of caste violence wasn’t enough, Arasu escalated the rhetoric into a full-blown anti-Brahmin tirade. He dragged in the Gandhi assassination, claiming that the entire plot was orchestrated by Brahmins, and even attempted to indict Veer Savarkar, despite his acquittal. The narrative was stitched together with old tropes: Brahmins as oppressors, RSS as murderers, and Sanatana Dharma as a violent, supremacist ideology.

What followed was a long, revisionist retelling of Nathuram Godse’s trial, presented not for historical understanding, but to paint Hindutva as inherently violent. Arasu insinuated that the judiciary was complicit in letting Savarkar off, selectively quoting Godse’s 93-page courtroom statement as though it were a holy text conveniently ignoring the complexities of the case and the absence of legal proof against Savarkar.

His broader point? That there is an ongoing conspiracy to turn India into a Hindu Rashtra, driven by a supposed Brahminical class and RSS ideology. Ironically, while crying wolf about oppression, Arasu himself seemed quite comfortable promoting communal stereotyping and collective guilt precisely the kind of thinking that has fueled violence throughout history.

Then came the predictable Muslim appeasement. Arasu claimed that Muslims are essentially Hindus who rejected Varnasrama Dharma in search of equality, and that is why they are now “targeted.” He tied Dalit and Muslim oppression together in a sweeping generalization, asserting that both communities are attacked because they reject caste and Sanatana Dharma. No nuance, no room for discussion just ideological binaries and manufactured victimhood.

Vanni Arasu said, “People who left Hinduism by rejecting the four varnas and opposing Sanatana Dharma were Muslims. They went to Islam saying, “We do not accept these four varnas. We do not accept this discrimination. We will accept equality and social justice.”

“Revolutionary Ambedkar also said the same thing. “We do not accept these four varnas. We are not within these four varnas. Because the one born from the head is a Brahmin, the one from the shoulder is a Kshatriya, the one from the thigh is a Vaishya, and the one from the feet is a Shudra. But we are not in that. Those who oppose all these four varnas are Dalits.’ ‘We will not accept these four varnas. We are not Hindus,’ said the revolutionary Ambedkar. We are not bound by these four varnas. We are not the fifth caste.'” 

He added, “Muslims left because they did not accept Varnasrama. Dalits did not accept it either. It is Sanatana Dharma that targets and oppresses these two communities with murders. The rulers today are doing the work of upholding Sanatana Dharma. Why are Muslims being targeted? Why is hate politics being used against them? Because they did not accept Sanatana Dharma. Why are honor killings being committed against Dalits? Why are their settlements being burned? Why are they being chased, killed, and kept outside the village? Because they did not accept these four varnas.”

He then quoted Ambedkar, cherry-picking lines to fit his agenda conveniently ignoring Ambedkar’s own complex views on religion, reform, and social progress finally he accepted Buddhism not Islam. Vanni Arasu conveniently quoted another person Athavan Thiruchani to say, Hinduism itself is a compilation of castes, and if you remove caste, there would be nothing left of Hinduism.

This is the Dravidianist playbook in action, erase nuance, distort history, demonize Hindu symbols, and wrap it all up in the language of social justice. The real goal isn’t caste abolition it’s ideological domination, cloaked in the garb of activism. It’s not about reform, it’s about revenge politics waged not just against Brahmins or the RSS, but against the very civilizational fabric of India.

It is baffling how this group, operating within its tightly sealed echo chamber, constantly recycles old lies as if repetition makes them truer. Like a Goebbelsian propaganda machine, they tell each other what they want to hear and mistake their confirmation bias for reality then seek to impose this worldview on everyone else.

If this is the intellectual standard of the so-called abolitionist movement in Tamil Nadu, then it’s no wonder serious discourse on caste reform is stuck in ideological quicksand. When anti-caste activism becomes a mask for anti-Hindu propaganda, it loses all moral and intellectual credibility.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

ST Student Expelled From TN Govt School For Lack Of Aadhaar & Birth Certificate; BJP Leader Annamalai Slams DMK’s ‘Social Justice’ Claim

social justice annamalai tn govt school

BJ leader K. Annamalai criticized the DMK-led state government, stating that “Social Justice” remains merely a slogan with no real implementation on the ground. His remarks came after a Scheduled Tribe (ST) student was expelled from a government school for not having a birth certificate or Aadhaar card.

The student, Santhosh, son of Sivakumar and Radhika, is a 7th-grade student a resident of Amma Nagar in the Poonamallee, who has been attending school without an Aadhaar card. Reportedly, the school required the Aadhaar for continued enrollment. For the past six months, his family has been making rounds to various government offices including the Poonamallee Tahsildar’s office and the Koyambedu Aadhar office to resolve the issue, but to no avail. Frustrated, the student and his parents took their plea to the District Collector’s grievance day meeting, explaining that the lack of a birth certificate has prevented them from obtaining an Aadhaar card effectively denying the child his right to education.

Reacting to the incident, Annamalai via his official X account said, “Is this part of the State education policy you released a few days back, Thiru @mkstalin? Our Hon PM Thiru @narendramodi avl empowered the Narikuravar community by including them in the ST list, and here is DMK Govt rusticating a boy from that community from the Government school for lack of Birth Certificate and an Aadhar card. His parents have knocked on the doors of every government office including the Tahsildar’s office in Thiruvallur district, only to be met with apathy. Under the DMK government, ‘Social Justice’ exists only in speeches, not in action.”

(With inputs from Dinakaran)

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

DMK Stooge Actor Karthi Says “TN Govt Schools Are Excellent”, But 207 Of Them Have Been Shut Down Owing To Zero Student Enrollment

dmk stooge karthi anbil mahesh excellent govt schools shut down tamil nadu tn zero enrollment

While Kollywood actor and Dravidianist sympathiser Karthi showered praise on Tamil Nadu’s School Education Minister Anbil Mahesh, claiming government schools were thriving under his stewardship, the reality on the ground tells a very different story.

The Tamil Nadu government has closed 207 primary and middle schools across the state this academic year after reporting zero student enrollment, according to the School Education Department.

Tamil Nadu has 31,332 government primary and middle schools, with 18,46,550 students studying from Classes 1 to 8. Officials said a significant number of these institutions record only single-digit student strength, and in some cases, just one student. Children from such schools are being transferred to nearby institutions.

An education department official said that enrollment in government schools had temporarily risen during the COVID-19 pandemic due to economic hardship. However, after restrictions eased, many parents moved their children back to private schools, citing concerns over infrastructure, teacher shortages, and a preference for English-medium education.

“This year, 207 schools have been closed as there was not a single student enrolled,” the official said to Dinamalar, adding that teachers from these institutions have been transferred elsewhere.

Parents and education activists allege that poor infrastructure, multi-grade teaching by just two teachers for Classes 1 to 5, and lack of proactive enrollment efforts by some teachers have contributed to the decline. They have urged the government to improve facilities to prevent further closures.

District-wise Closures

The largest number of closures were in Nilgiris (17), Sivaganga (16), and Dindigul (12). Chennai, Erode, and Madurai each saw 10 closures, while Coimbatore and Ramanathapuram reported 9 each. Other affected districts include Tuticorin (8), Dharmapuri (7), Tirupur (7), Virudhunagar (7), and several others with smaller numbers.

Closure in Annamalai’s Hometown

Among the affected schools is the Uthupatti Government Primary School in K. Paramathi Panchayat Union, Karur district, where Tamil Nadu BJP’s former state president K. Annamalai cast his vote in the last Lok Sabha elections. The school has now been shut due to lack of students.

Officials maintain that the closures are temporary and that students will continue their education in nearby schools. However, activists warn that without urgent infrastructure upgrades, more rural schools may face the same fate.

(With inputs from Dinamalar)

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Asim Munir’s Second US Visit Signals Repeat of Pakistan’s ‘Double Game’, Warns Report

pakistan army chief asim munir warning usa trip

Pakistan Army Chief General Asim Munir‘s recent visit to the United States – his second to the country since June – is being seen less as a genuine effort to strengthen bilateral ties and more as a bid to secure financial aid, political shield, and fresh channels of influence, all of which will be harnessed for Pakistan’s “military-industrial-terrorism complex”, a report cited on Monday.

The Pakistani military, the report mentioned, has pocketed American money, arms, and diplomatic protection since the Cold War, only to channel them into its own narrow and destructive agenda.

“In the 1980s, the US poured billions into Pakistan to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan. Instead of building stability, Pakistan’s intelligence service, the ISI, nurtured the very jihadist networks that would later birth the Taliban and al-Qaeda. Osama bin Laden found shelter in Abbottabad, barely a stone’s throw from Pakistan’s premier military academy, even as Islamabad swore blind loyalty to Washington,” a Global Order report highlighted.

It detailed how the 2000s saw the same “double game” where, under the Bush administration, Pakistan was a major non-NATO ally in the war on terror, and yet, the Taliban leadership operated freely from Pakistani soil. “American troops in Afghanistan paid with their lives while Pakistan quietly provided safe havens, training, and arms to the insurgents killing them. The betrayal was not subtle; it was strategic,” the report mentioned.

Pakistan continues to be a terror hub while claiming to combat terrorism. Its territory shelters internationally designated terrorist groups, including Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed, which target neighbouring countries, particularly India and Afghanistan, and propagate extremist ideology far beyond the region.

These groups function under the protective cover of the Pakistani government, which directs their violent actions to further its geopolitical objectives. Pakistan’s counter-terrorism narrative, the report stated, is a facade to ensure the continuation of US aid and weapon supplies.

Pakistan’s growing involvement in US Central Command (CENTCOM) operations also raises concern, given its long history of duplicity. The report stated that Islamabad’s access to CENTCOM intelligence and planning could pose a serious risk to stability in the Middle East.

With the Pakistani military maintaining strong connections with extremist networks and having a well-established track record of leaking sensitive intelligence reports to parties hostile to the US and allied interests, Islamabad’s engagement in CENTCOM endangers operations in the Gulf and could provide radical elements with insight into American strategies in an already volatile region.

The report emphasised that if the US President Donald Trump or any US administration believes that Pakistan has reformed, they should consider the recent ground realities as the South Asian nation still harbours UN-designated terrorists, exports jihadists into its neighbourhood, and turns a blind eye to the radical preaching that fuels global extremism.

“If America falls for the pitch again, it will not only embolden Pakistan but also destabilise the region at a time when the US needs reliability in its partnerships. Asim Munir’s second visit to Washington in a month should be read not as a sign of strengthening friendship, but as a warning flare: history is about to repeat itself. And when it does, the betrayal will be complete, again,” the report noted.

-IANS

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.