Home Blog Page 244

Days After Charlie Kirk Assassination, Trump Declares Antifa A ‘Major Terrorist Organisation’

Days After Charlie Kirk Assassination, Trump Declares Antifa A ‘Major Terrorist Organisation’

US President Donald Trump on Thursday (Indian time) officially designated Antifa as a “major terrorist organisation”, days after the killing of his close aide and right-wing political activist Charlie Kirk.

“I am pleased to inform our many USA Patriots that I am designating Antifa, a sick, dangerous, radical left disaster, as a major terrorist organisation. I will also be strongly recommending that those funding Antifa be thoroughly investigated in accordance with the highest legal standards and practices. Thank you for your attention to this matter!” Trump wrote in a post on his social media platform, Truth Social.

Trump did not elaborate on what parameters his administration would use to make the characterisation and what actions he would take to target a left-leaning movement. Antifa does not seem to have a centralised structure or any defined leadership. Last week, the US President repeatedly blamed the left for rising political violence in the country, including for the murder of conservative commentator Charlie Kirk.

“I’ll tell you something that’s going to get me in trouble, but I couldn’t care less. The radicals on the right oftentimes are radical because they don’t want to see crime. The radicals on the left are the problem, and they’re vicious and they’re horrible and they’re politically savvy,” he said in an interview with Fox News. On Tuesday, prosecutors in Utah charged Tyler Robinson, the main accused in Kirk’s killing, with aggravated murder and six other charges and announced that they will seek the death penalty.

According to the prosecutors, Robinson’s mother told investigators that “over the last year or so, Robinson had become more political and had started to lean more to the left — becoming more pro-gay and trans-rights oriented.” The document also noted that the mother stated Robinson had begun dating his roommate, a biological male transitioning to become a woman. Kirk, who was 31 years old, was delivering remarks during a campus event at Utah Valley University on September 10 when he was shot in the neck.

He was rushed to the hospital but succumbed to his injuries shortly after. Kirk was the founder of Turning Point USA (TPUSA), the country’s most prominent conservative student organisation. He launched the Arizona-based group in 2012 at the age of 18, building it into a political powerhouse with over 800 chapters across US colleges. TPUSA became a central force in mobilising young conservative voters, particularly in the 2024 election, where it played a pivotal role in boosting Trump’s re-election campaign.

-IANS

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

AIADMK Slaps Legal Notice Against Serial Fake News Peddler And DMK Stooge ‘Journo’ Niranjan Kumar

The AIADMK has issued a legal notice to former journalist Niranjan, warning of legal action if he fails to apologize for reporting that party general secretary and opposition leader Edappadi K. Palaniswami allegedly left Union Home Minister Amit Shah’s residence in Delhi with his face covered.

On 16 September 2025, Palaniswami had travelled to Delhi along with senior AIADMK leaders, stating that he wished to personally congratulate C.P. Radhakrishnan on his assumption of office as the Vice President of India. During the visit, Palaniswami met Radhakrishnan and later held consultations with Amit Shah at 8.10 PM.

Reports subsequently emerged claiming that after the meeting with Amit Shah, Palaniswami asked senior AIADMK leaders accompanying him to return to their hotel, and that he, along with his son, continued discussions with the Union Home Minister. Following the consultations, speculation circulated online that Palaniswami had left Amit Shah’s residence in a different vehicle, allegedly concealing his face.

Former Puthiya Thalaimurai journalist Niranjan broadcast this version of events live, claiming that Palaniswami departed with his face covered. The report went viral on social media, triggering sharp reactions within the AIADMK.

Niranjan had posted a video with the caption:

In response, AIADMK members sent a legal notice to Niranjan demanding an apology. The party’s IT Wing also issued a statement on social media, asserting that a legal notice had been dispatched as the first step in pursuing legal proceedings against Niranjan for spreading what it described as “defamatory news” against Palaniswami.

The AIADMK statement said the report was “completely contrary to media ethics” and accused sections of the media of acting in alignment with the DMK’s political agenda. The party further claimed that the “fourth pillar of democracy” was betraying the trust of the people of Tamil Nadu by allegedly serving as “agenda carriers” of the DMK, which, it argued, had “earned the total hatred” of the people of the state.

Instances When DMK Stooge Journo Peddled Fake News

Here are some instances where Dravidianist propagandist Niranjan Kumar, peddled narratives favourable to the DMK, reinforcing their narratives and ideology.

1. Mocking Hindu Sentiments Via Propaganda

On 18 September 2024, Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister N Chandrababu Naidu accused the former YSR Congress Party (YSRCP) government of using substandard ingredients, including animal fat, in the famous Tirupati laddu. However, YSRCP denied these allegations.

A laboratory report revealed that beef tallow, fish oil, and palm oil were used to prepare laddus, which were distributed as prasad at the renowned Sri Venkateswara temple in Tirupati. The report’s findings indicate that the ghee used to prepare the iconic Tirupati laddu prasadam during the YSRCP regime contained traces of animal fat, including beef tallow and fish oil, leading to widespread outrage and claims of disrespect toward religious sentiments.

As the entire Hindu community is outraged by reports of adulteration of Tirupati Laddu prasadam with beef tallow, pig fat and fish oil, the DMK-supporting Dravidianists in Tamil Nadu have pounced on the opportunity to mock Hindus and their worship of cows.

Dravidian journo Niranjan Kumar in an X post that seemingly justified the presence of beef fat in the holy prasadam, the Dravidianist journalist said “Let all those souls who were lynched to death attain peace“, in an apparent dig at gau rakshaks protecting cows from smugglers.

In another post he mocked at Hindus by making reference to a scene from the film ‘Ayan’ in which the antagonist offers laddu to a character played by actor Prabhu, to signify the striking of a deal. Prabhu offers the laddu back to the antagonist to confirm it is not poisoned. However, later Prabhu’s car meets with an accident because the antagonist had removed the nuts and bolts from the wheels.

You thought I kept it in the laddu? I kept it in the nut-u“, says the antagonist.

In this case, the malice was actually in the laddu and so, the screenshot and snippet of this scene was shared by many Dravidianists and DMK-Congress supporters. Niranjan too shared the same screenshot to mock Hindus.

The bigoted Dravidian propagandist shared another screenshot from the movie ‘Yaaradi Nee Mohini’ in which the character blushes as she says “Achaho Perumale”. The propagandist at Puthiya Thalaimurai in a sadistic way expressed his elation at Hindu devotees being duped and made to eat laddu laden with beef fat.

2. Peddling Distorted Facts From Delhi

This is not the first instance of bias from Dravidianist journalist Niranjan Kumar. Previously, when the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) secured a historic third consecutive term in Haryana by winning 48 seats in the 2024 assembly elections, Kumar’s coverage was similarly skewed. In the elections, the Congress party secured 37 seats, with the 90-seat assembly holding voting in a single phase on 5 October 2024, and a turnout of around 68%. The BJP had also emerged victorious in the Haryana Assembly elections of 2014 and 2019, yet Kumar’s reporting failed to provide a fair or balanced account of these outcomes.

Despite facing significant opposition and unfavorable political predictions where Congress was projected to secure around 60 seats compared to the BJP’s 20, the BJP casually turned the tables. Silent voters in Haryana demonstrated their support for the BJP, and concerns over instability under Congress, particularly regarding the influence of the Jat community and employment issues, influenced the election results.

However, the Dravidianist journalists, promoted narratives to buttress the Congress. At midday, when the BJP was projected to secure 46 seats and Congress was trailing with only 38, Niranjan Kumar claimed on live TV that BJP spokespersons were avoiding the media due to expected turn in tides. He stated, “Spokespersons were holding continuous press briefings, but for the past half hour, they have been avoiding questions. This change comes as the polling landscape shifts, with the BJP fluctuating around 50 seats. We could see that BJP leaders here are anxious about their ability to sustain the government.”

 

This caught the attention of netizens and political observers, who took to social media to call him out and mock him with amusement. This isn’t the first instance of Niranjan Kumar’s dubious journalism in support of his political masters; he consistently demonstrates his loyalty at every opportunity.

3. Peddling Narrative For Congress During Lok Sabha

During this recent Lok Sabha election season, Kumar seemingly expressed a strong desire for the victory of the Congress, but when that did not materialize, he immediately started celebrating the success of the DMK like several other Dravidianist journalists.

In a post following Narendra Modi’s swearing-in for a third term as Prime Minister of India, Kumar intentionally misled his audience with false information on his X account, claiming that Modi’s third cabinet lacked any members directly elected from Tamil Nadu. This statement raised eyebrows, especially since the DMK, as the opposition, had won all the Lok Sabha seats in the state. It appeared as though he was implying that PM Modi should consider including DMK members in the cabinet.

Niranjan Kumar wrote, “Important: Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s third cabinet did not include a single member of parliament directly elected from Tamil Nadu. L Murugan, Nirmala Sitharaman, and others have also been elected to Rajya Sabha from other states.”

4. Spreading Distorted Facts About Removal of Statues In Parliament

In two other posts, Niranjan Kumar raised concerns about the removal of statues of Mahatma Gandhi and Ambedkar in the Parliament complex. However, this claim was promptly refuted and labeled as a fake narrative with the Parliament secretariat clarifying that the statues were being relocated systematically and respectfully within the Parliament House complex. Despite this clarification from the secretariat, the so-called Delhi-based journalist chose not to acknowledge or convey their statement, instead opting to propagate the narrative of the Congress party.

This post raises the question of whether Niranjan Kumar is indeed a journalist based in Delhi or if he is from 24, Akbar Road, New Delhi.

Niranjan Kumar wrote, “The Congress party has alleged that the statues of the Father of the Nation Mahatma Gandhi and the architect of the Constitution of India, Ambedkar, are being removed and placed in a corner. Congress alleges that BJP has started insulting political leaders

5. Peddling Distorted Facts Favoring DMK Minister

Niranjan Kumar faced criticism from netizens for blindly sharing information without fact-checking, as promoted by a DMK minister. In a post on his X account, amid the ongoing uproar from I.N.D.I.Alliance partners regarding allegations of the central government “looting tax revenue” from states, he quoted DMK Minister PTR Palanivel Thiagarajan during a protest at Delhi’s Jantar Mantar. He wrote, “There was a Chief Minister in India who claimed the central government is deceiving them and spoke about federal principles. He said they are taking our state’s tax money and diverting it to other states: he is none other than the former Chief Minister of Gujarat, Narendra Modi, who is now the Prime Minister.”

However, his claims were quickly debunked. After assuming office, PM Modi increased the allocation of funds to states from 32% to 42%. He also reduced the population weightage in tax distribution from 27.5% to 15%.

Moreover, during the UPA regime from 2004 to 2014, the total funds available to states amounted to ₹30 lakh crore, while from 2014 to 2023, this figure soared to over ₹100 lakh crore.

In terms of tax sharing and assistance, Tamil Nadu received ₹1,52,921 crores under the UPA from 2004 to 2014. In contrast, this amount increased to ₹5,08,337 crores during the Modi regime from 2014 to 2023.

Additionally, Tamil Nadu has benefited from ₹10.76 lakh crores in funds, projects, and grants over the past nine years under the Modi government.

6. Peddled Fake News About Repo Rates

On 9 February 2023, the Reserve Bank of India raised the repo rate by 25 basis points to 6.50% to curb retail inflation. This move is expected to increase the cost of loans linked to external benchmarks, like the repo rate. Following the hike, DMK supporters, including journalist Niranjan Kumar of Puthiya Thalaimurai, spread misinformation, with Kumar suggesting that the dream of buying a house would remain unfulfilled. However, the rate hike is a standard response to inflationary pressures in a growing economy, a basic economic principle that Kumar either ignored or lacked knowledge of.

7. Parroted DMK Minister’s Line In Ponmudi Mud Throwing Incident, Blames BJP

Even now, Niranjan Kumar pushed a biased narrative in his recent coverage of an incident involving DMK Minister Ponmudi. On 3 December 2024, during Ponmudi’s visit to Villupuram to distribute relief materials and assess the damage caused by Cyclone Fengal, a group of individuals relief materials, staining his white shirt. The incident quickly went viral on social media, with initial reports suggesting that locals were angry at the governments inefficiency in relief work.

 

However, Niranjan Kumar shamelessly framed the incident with the headline, “Throwing mud at Minister Ponmudi… BJP woman functionary in the background.” This narrative was based on an explanation given by HRCE Minister PK Sekar Babu in an interview, and the police were still investigating the case, with no arrests reported at that time. Meanwhile, other videos began circulating on social media showing a group of agitated youths and locals—agitated by the government’s relief efforts—tearing down DMK banners associated with Ponmudi. Netizens quickly questioned whether these youths were affiliated with the BJP, mocking the narrative. Despite the growing online discussion, Kumar continued to push his one-sided portrayal of the incident.

8.Made Unverified Claims During Evacuation Mission During Russia-Ukraine War

In March 2022, during the Russia-Ukraine war, Niranjan alleged that South Indian students were discriminated in the evacuation operation from Ukraine. The journalist based his claim on an unverified source, a parent of a student who had returned from Ukraine, and did not provide any credible evidence or corroboration for his allegation.

9.Peddled Lies That Modi Govt Rejected TN Tableau For R-Day

He also misreported that the Modi government rejected Tamil Nadu’s Republic Day tableau for not featuring prominent freedom fighters, though the selection process is based on an expert committee’s recommendations.

 

He had peddled fake news that the Modi Government at the Centre had ‘rejected’ Tamil Nadu’s tableau for the Republic Day Parade for not having ‘prominent freedom fighters’ while the fact is that each year only limited number of tableaus from states are selected based on the recommendations of an expert committee appointed by the Ministry of Defence. Tamil Nadu’s tableaus were selected in 2016, 2017, 2019, 2020 and 2021, far more than many other states.

10.Peddled Fake News That BJP Candidate Uma Anandan Lost By 8 Votes

In February 2022, the alleged ‘journalist had peddled fake news against BJP candidate of Ward No. 134. Uma Anandan, saying that she had lost by securing just 8 votes while she emerged as a winner with 5635 votes.

11.Falsely Linked Hemant Soren Arrest To Cancelled Flights

He falsely linked the arrest of Hemant Soren and alleged horse-trading of Jharkhand MLAs to cancelled flights, claiming it was a BJP conspiracy. He suggested that JMM was attempting to move MLAs to another state due to inclement weather. However, fact-checking organization Only Truth debunked his claim, explaining that the flight cancellations were due to heavy fog disrupting services for over 20 days. Reports from reputable outlets corroborated this, but Kumar continued to justify his false narrative. Netizens mocked his misrepresentation of the facts and his political motives.

12.Made Fake Claims About HP’s Education System

In January 2024, Niranjan’s claim about spending two days in Manali and making statements about the state’s education system was debunked by data, revealing that even Manali had a higher literacy rate compared to Tamil Nadu. His assertions about better facilities in the state were contradicted by the state’s move to seek donations for school development and concerns over the use of Hindu temple funds for schools. The deplorable condition of government model schools in the state’s capital highlighted the deterioration of the education system.

13.Tried To Stoke Controversy In Parliament Security Breach

In December 2023, Niranjan, posing as a journalist, sought to stoke caste-based animosity by spotlighting the name “Sagar Sharma” in connection with the Lok Sabha security breach. By emphasizing Sharma’s surname and linking it predominantly to Brahmins, he aimed to escalate caste tensions surrounding the incident.

14.Peddled DMK Narrative On ‘Thamizhagam’ Controversy

In January 2023 witnessed Niranjan contributing to the misrepresentation of Tamil Nadu Governor RN Ravi’s statements. The governor’s call for using “Thamizhagam” instead of “Tamil Nadu” was distorted by certain media outlets, including alleged journalist Niranjan, leading to the trending of separatist tweets with the hashtag #தமிழ்நாடு.

15.Tried To Blame BJP For Rameshwaram Cafe Blast

Niranjan Kumar falsely reported that BJP member Sai Prasad had been arrested by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) in connection with the Rameshwaram cafe explosion in Bengaluru. Kumar claimed Prasad was involved with suspects linked to the blast, citing unverified sources and insinuating the BJP’s connection to terrorism. This narrative was widely spread by Congress and other Dravidian media outlets, including Sun News and Kalaignar News, fueling regional tensions.

 

However, the NIA clarified that Prasad was only summoned as a witness due to his prior connection to a mobile phone purchased by an arrested suspect. The phone was used by one of the main suspects, but there was no evidence linking Prasad to the blast itself. Kumar’s misleading claims were debunked, but the narrative continued to be propagated by partisan media, fueling misinformation.

16.Peddled Fake News That FM Nirmala Sitharaman Refused To Meet TN CM

In 2021, he was also called out for spreading misinformation about Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman’s refusal to meet Tamil Nadu’s CM EPS. He had stated that the Minister had refused to meet Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Edappadi K. Palaniswami citing budget consultation work.

(With inputs from Asianet News)

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Gems Of Justice BR Gavai

Justice Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai, aka BR Gavai, the present Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of India, has hit headlines for making insensitive comments at a Hindu petitioner while dismissing his petition.

While the judge may have been right in making the order, the harsh thoughtless comments have hurt the majority of Hindus across the country. Let us take a look at some of his gems of statements and orders he has authored over the past few years.

#1 Mocked Hindu Petitioner For Seeking Restoration Of Beheaded Vishnu Idol At Khajuraho

The Supreme Court on 16 September 2025 refused to hear a plea seeking restoration of a beheaded 7-foot idol of Lord Vishnu at the Javari temple in Khajuraho, Madhya Pradesh, in Rakesh Dalal v. Union of India. A Bench of CJI BR Gavai and Justice Augustine George Masih held the matter was for the ASI, not the Court. CJI Gavai told the petitioner, “Go and ask the deity itself to do something now… It’s an archaeological site and ASI needs to give permission etc. Sorry.” Petitioner Rakesh Dalal argued the idol was mutilated during Mughal invasions and government inaction violated devotees’ right to worship.

#2 Wants Nationwide Fire Cracker Ban

On 12 September 2025, Chief Justice of India BR Gavai stressed that the firecracker ban should extend nationwide, not just Delhi, to ensure all citizens enjoy pollution-free air. He highlighted the hardships faced by street workers and daily wagers, noting pollution is a national issue, citing Amritsar as worse than Delhi. The CJI emphasized that policies must consider both public health and livelihoods of those dependent on the firecracker industry. Senior advocates highlighted the severe impact on citizens, while the Court reaffirmed the need for a complete ban unless “green crackers” can be scientifically proven to cause minimal pollution.

#3 “Have Some Decorum, He Is Still Justice Varma” – Advices Lawyer to Address Tainted Judge Yashwant Varma As “Justice Varma”

In a striking courtroom exchange on 21 July 2025, Chief Justice of India BR Gavai reprimanded Advocate Mathews J Nedumpara for referring to Delhi High Court judge Yashwant Varma, embroiled in a cash recovery controversy, simply as “Varma.” Nedumpara, seeking urgent listing of his petition demanding an FIR against Justice Varma, was interrupted by CJI Gavai, who insisted, “He is still Justice Varma. How do you address him? Have some decorum. You are referring to a learned judge. He is still a judge of the Court.” Nedumpara replied, “I don’t think that greatness can apply to him. Matter has to be listed.” CJI snapped back, “Don’t dictate to the Court.” The clash highlighted the judiciary’s internal contradiction, insisting on ceremonial respect for a judge under serious scrutiny. Despite allegations and a pending writ filed by Justice Varma himself, the Court remained firm on maintaining titles and decorum, even as Nedumpara argued that “an FIR has to be registered.”

#4 Stays Action Against Psephologist Who Misled People Through False Data

In August 2025, a bench led by Chief Justice BR Gavai and Justice N.V. Anjaria stayed proceedings against psephologist and Lokniti-CSDS co-director Sanjay Kumar, who was facing multiple FIRs for a now-deleted tweet claiming a sharp decline in voter numbers during the Maharashtra assembly elections. Kumar had apologised, calling it an ‘unintentional error’ caused by a data misreading. The court issued notice on his plea to quash the complaints.

#5 “Interfered” In Decision Taken On Stray Dogs Menace

On 13 August 2025, Chief Justice of India BR Gavai said, “I will look into this,” while responding to concerns over conflicting Supreme Court orders on the stray dog issue. CJI Gavai, heading a Bench, constituted a three-judge bench to examine the matter after advocate Nanita Sharma, for NGO Conference for Human Rights (India), highlighted contradictions. She pointed out that a May 2024 order by Justices J.K. Maheshwari and Sanjay Karol barred indiscriminate killing of canines, while a more recent 11 August 2025 order by Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan directed civic bodies in Delhi-NCR to remove all stray dogs from public spaces within eight weeks. After CJI Gavai intervention, the Supreme Court modified its earlier order on stray dogs in Delhi-NCR, directing release in original areas post-sterilisation and vaccination, except for rabid or aggressive animals. Expanding the issue nationwide, it sought a pan-India policy, imposed costs on NGOs/individuals, and emphasised feeding zones while restricting public feeding to ensure safety.

#6 Said Reservation Like Train Compartment

On a seven-judge bench, contributed to the ruling that states can create sub-categories in the Scheduled Castes for reservation purposes and advocated, in a concurring opinion, for the application of creamy layer exclusion to SCs and STs. Justice BR Gavai, in the ruling on the sub-classification of Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) stated, “I find that the attitude of the categories in the Presidential List opposing such a sub-classification is that of a person in the general compartment of the train. Firstly, the persons outside the compartment struggled to get into the general compartment. However, once they get inside it, they make every attempt possible to prevent the persons outside such a compartment from entering it.”

#7 Said Bulldozer Demolitions Of Accused’s Property Unconstitutional

In a judgment on 13 November 2024, a Supreme Court bench comprising Chief Justice BR Gavai and Justice KV Viswanathan condemned the practice of demolishing properties of individuals merely for being accused or convicted. The Court held that the executive cannot act as judge, emphasizing that arbitrary demolition violates the principles of rule of law, natural justice, and the right to life under Article 21. It reinforced that a house represents years of effort, stability, and family aspirations, and demolition without due process constitutes collective punishment. The judgment laid down strict procedural safeguards: issuance of show-cause notices, personal hearings, documentation, digital portals for transparency, and videography of demolitions. Only unauthorized, non-compoundable constructions can be demolished after exhausting all legal remedies. CJI Gavai highlighted that such executive actions without judicial oversight are wholly arbitrary and an abuse of process, reinforcing constitutional protections against high-handed state actions.

#8 Granted Bail To Manish Sisodia In Delhi Excise Scam “Based On Delay”

On 9 August 2024, a Supreme Court bench led by Chief Justice BR Gavai and Justice KV Viswanathan granted bail to former Delhi Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia in both CBI and ED cases related to the Delhi Excise Liquor Policy. The Court observed that Sisodia had been incarcerated for over seventeen months while the trials had barely commenced, violating his fundamental right to a speedy trial under Article 21. It emphasized that bail cannot be withheld as punishment and that Sisodia required adequate time to inspect over 69,000 pages of documents. Bail was granted with conditions including furnishing bonds, surrendering his passport, and reporting to authorities.

#9 Granted Temporary Bail To Teesta Setalvad After Urgent Midnight Hearing & Then Regular Bail Later

On 1 July 2023, CJI BR Gavai was part of the Supreme Court bench that granted Teesta Setalvad temporary bail after the Gujarat High Court denied her release. The urgent late-night hearing convened a larger three-judge panel following a deadlock in a two-judge bench. Critics highlighted the speed and prioritization of her case, contrasting it with systemic delays for ordinary citizens. Setalvad, accused of falsifying evidence and coaching witnesses in the 2002 Gujarat riots, has strong political ties to Congress. Gavai’s intervention ensured procedural relief, but the move sparked debate over judicial impartiality and perceived preferential treatment in politically sensitive cases.

On 19 July 2023, a Supreme Court bench comprising CJI BR Gavai, AS Bopanna, and Dipankar Datta granted regular bail to civil rights activist Teesta Setalvad in connection with an FIR alleging fabrication of evidence in the 2002 Godhra riots. The Supreme Court quashed the High Court order, granting her bail and ensuring procedural fairness in light of prior interim bail and prolonged litigation.

#10 Stayed Rahul Gandhi’s Conviction In Modi Surname Remark Case

On 4 August 2023, a Supreme Court bench comprising BR Gavai, P.S. Narasimha, and Sanjay Kumar stayed the conviction of Rahul Gandhi in the “Modi surname” defamation case. Gandhi had been sentenced to two years’ imprisonment under Sections 499 and 500 IPC for his remarks linking the Modi surname to thieves. The Court noted the Trial Court gave no reasons for imposing the maximum sentence, which triggered disqualification under Section 8(3) of the Representation of the People Act. Considering the wide ramifications on Gandhi’s political rights and the electorate’s representation, the Court stayed the conviction while leaving the appeal to be decided on merits.

#11 Held Arrest Of NewsClick Founder Prabir Purkayastha As “Illegal”

On 6 March 2024, a Supreme Court bench of Justices BR Gavai and Sandeep Mehta invalidated the arrest and remand of 74-year-old journalist Prabir Purkayastha under the UAPA, citing violation of Article 22(1) of the Constitution. The Court held that neither Purkayastha nor his counsel were provided the grounds of arrest in writing, rendering the detention illegal. The judgment emphasized that written communication of arrest or detention is sacrosanct, extending PMLA principles to UAPA cases. While quashing the arrest and remand orders, the Court directed Purkayastha’s release on furnishing bail bonds, without commenting on the merits of the case.

#12 Strikes Down Electoral Bonds Scheme As “Unconstitutional”

On 15 February 2024, a 5-judge Constitution Bench including Justice BR Gavai and Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud unanimously held that the Electoral Bonds Scheme violates the right to information under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution. The Court ruled that anonymous political contributions obscure transparency, enabling quid pro quo arrangements and undermining informed voting. While the scheme aimed to curb black money, alternative methods like electronic transfers and electoral trusts exist. Consequently, the scheme and related amendments to the Income Tax, Companies, and Representation of Peoples Acts were struck down. SBI and ECI were directed to disclose past electoral bond transactions.

#13 Ordered Release Of Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Convicts

On 11 November 2022, a Bench of Justices BR Gavai and BV Nagarathna ordered the immediate release of six convicts; Nalini, Ravichandran, Jayakumar, Santhan, Murugan, and Robert Pius, who had served over three decades in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case. The Court held that the Tamil Nadu Governor was bound by the State Cabinet’s 2018 recommendation for their premature release under Article 161 and erred in forwarding files to the Union. Citing conduct, rehabilitation, and parity with co-convict Perarivalan, the Court directed their release, emphasizing that prolonged delay violates the constitutional clemency scheme and the convicts’ rights.

#14 Fined Prashant Bhushan 1 Rupee For Contempt

On 31 August 2020, a 3-judge bench of Arun Mishra, BR Gavai, and Krishna Murari, JJ. found advocate Prashant Bhushan guilty of criminal contempt for tweets criticizing the Supreme Court and sitting/former CJIs. The Court imposed a nominal fine of Re. 1, warning that non-payment would result in three months’ imprisonment and a three-year bar from practicing in the Court. The judgment emphasized that lawyers must respect the judiciary while exercising free speech, particularly in sub judice matters, and that malicious allegations undermine public trust. Fair criticism is allowed, but Bhushan’s tweets exceeded permissible bounds and showed no remorse.

#15 Asked “Why So Touchy?” When Swami Prasad Maurya Insulted Ramcharitmanas

The Supreme Court on January 25, 2024, stayed criminal proceedings against Samajwadi Party leader Swami Prasad Maurya, accused of insulting the Shri Ramcharitmanas and allegedly inciting the burning of its copies. A bench of Justices BR Gavai and Sandeep Mehta noted that Maurya’s remarks represented a “line of thought” and he could not be held responsible for subsequent acts. The Court observed, “Why are you so touchy about these things?” Notices were issued to the UP government and the complainant, and the Supreme Court agreed to examine Maurya’s special leave petition, pausing action while reviewing the matter further.

#16 Who Will Decide What Is Deceit In Religious Conversion, Asks Gavai

On 16 September 2025, the Supreme Court questioned the enforceability of stringent anti-conversion laws in States like Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand, and others, regulating interfaith marriages. Chief Justice B.R. Gavai highlighted the difficulty in determining whether a religious conversion is fraudulent. Senior advocates C.U. Singh, Indira Jaising, and Vrinda Grover argued that these Freedom of Religion Acts empower third parties to file complaints against interfaith couples, impose harsh penalties including 20-year to life sentences, and shift the burden of proof onto converts, effectively curbing religious freedom under Article 25. The court scheduled further hearings in six weeks.

CJI Gavai retires on 23 November 2025.

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Hosur Launches Drive To Convert Garbage Dumps Into Green Corners

Hosur Launches Drive To Convert Garbage Dumps Into Green Corners

Hosur City Municipal Corporation (HCMC) in Tamil Nadu’s Krishnagiri district has launched a major initiative to transform garbage dumping spots across the city into litter-free and green zones, in a bid to improve urban aesthetics and strengthen solid waste management.

The corporation has identified more than 500 Garbage Vulnerable Points (GVPs) across its 45 wards, despite the presence of door-to-door waste collection by conservancy workers. Officials said a section of residents continues to dump waste at street corners and public places, prompting the civic body to roll out a beautification drive. Corporation Commissioner Mohammad Shabbir Alam launched the programme last week by selecting 50 of the identified GVPs for conversion into landscaped areas.

Of these, 10 have already been developed at a cost of Rs 10,000 each, where plants and grass have replaced the garbage mounds. Residents and conservancy staff have been asked to water and maintain the greenery in their neighbourhoods. The initiative is estimated to cost Rs 5 lakh for the 50 sites.

“People were specifically told not to throw, burn, or bury waste in open or public spaces. Under the Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016 and the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies (TNULB) Rules, 2023, strict action will be taken against violators,” a corporation source said. Residents can report violations or non-collection of garbage through helplines 1800 599 0447 and 90422 98901.

Currently, 587 conservancy workers are engaged in door-to-door collection across HCMC limits. While many households are cooperating, officials admitted that a few pockets remain where residents refuse to hand over garbage. A survey is underway to map such areas, following which a detailed action plan will be implemented to ensure 100 per cent compliance.

Resident welfare associations have also been asked to encourage members to cooperate with the civic body. The impact of the drive is already visible in some areas. A traffic police personnel near RC Church said a former garbage dumping spot has been turned into a small garden.

“Earlier, it was filled with garbage and construction debris. Now the area is clean and safer for pedestrians, especially at night,” he said. With the conversion of dumping spots into green corners, HCMC hopes to not only beautify Hosur but also instil a sense of civic responsibility among its residents.

-IANS

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Chhattisgarh: 12 Maoists, Including 2 Area Committee Members, Surrender In Narayanpur

maoist surrender chhattisgarh naxals

In a significant development in Chhattisgarh’s Narayanpur district, twelve active Maoists surrendered before Superintendent of Police Robinson Guria on Wednesday, marking a major success for the ongoing Maoists eradication campaign. Among those who laid down arms were two area committee members, considered key figures in the insurgent network.

The total bounty on the surrendered individuals exceeded Rs 18 lakh, underscoring the importance of this breakthrough. “Of them, five are female and seven are male Maoists,” Guria said. The surrender is being seen as a direct result of the government’s robust rehabilitation policy, which has been actively encouraging Maoists to return to mainstream society.

Officials confirmed that the group included members from various wings of the Naxal organisation, such as LOS-CNM, PPCM, Military Latoon, and Jantana Sarkar. Their decision to surrender reflects growing disillusionment within the ranks and increasing faith in the state’s reintegration efforts. Superintendent of Police Robinson Guria, who accepted the surrender, said that the move would not only weaken the operational strength of Maoist groups in the region but also send a strong message to others still engaged in armed rebellion.

The state government had previously announced rewards totalling over Rs 18 lakh on their heads, which will now be nullified following their surrender. This event comes amid a broader national push to eliminate Naxalism. Union Home Minister Amit Shah has set March 2026 as the deadline for the complete eradication of the movement.

The numbers reflect steady progress; in 2024, a total of 928 Maoists surrendered, and in the first four months of 2025 alone, 718 have already laid down arms. Additionally, more than 241 Maoists have been killed in security operations this year. The Narayanpur surrender is being hailed as a morale booster for security forces and a validation of the government’s dual strategy of firm military action combined with inclusive rehabilitation.

As the deadline for eliminating Naxalism approaches, such developments are expected to accelerate, bringing hope for lasting peace and stability in affected regions. With continued efforts and community engagement, the vision of a Naxal-free India is steadily becoming a reality—one surrender at a time.

-IANS

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Dharmasthala Probe: SIT Unearths Bones, Soil Samples Amid Fresh Excavations

Dharmasthala Probe: SIT Unearths Bones, Soil Samples Amid Fresh Excavations

In a major development the Special Investigation Team (SIT) probing the Dharmasthala murder case resumed excavations on Wednesday at Banglegudde region in Dharmasthala temple town and collected bones and soil from the suspected burial spots. A team of 50 to 60, including SIT officers, Scene Of Crime Officers (SOCO) and others are monitoring the excavation work carried out by the civic workers.

The team has taken a sack of salt, five to six plastic PVC pipes, boxes and other materials to the spot. Sources confirmed that the team has found bones and some denim cloth at the new burial spots. The team has collected bones and soil samples from the spots and continued the excavation operation amid rain. The excavation work is being carried out between the 11th and 12th burial sites.

The development has assumed significance as SIT Chief Pronab Mohanty had met Chief Minister Siddaramaiah on Tuesday and briefed him about the progress of the investigation. The excavation is being carried out based on the statement made by Vittal Gowda, a close relative of Soujanya, who was allegedly kidnapped, gang raped and killed in Dharmasthala. Vittal Gowda had claimed that he had seen a pile of bones of children and bodies being buried in Dharmasthala.

The SIT has launched excavation operations in this background. Meanwhile, activists approached the Supreme Court on Tuesday, calling for urgent judicial oversight in the case. The Supreme Court has been urged to take suo motu cognisance of the alleged mass burials in Dharmasthala, after disturbing revelations were made by sanitation worker C.N. Chinnayya, known as ‘mask man’, who reported decades-long secret burials linked to alleged crimes and sexual assaults.

Advocate Rohit Pandey has formally appealed to the Chief Justice of India to place the SIT under the supervision of a Retired Supreme Court Judge for transparent and independent investigation and ensure immediate exhumation and forensic examination of all visible remains at Banglegudde and other identified sites under judicial oversight.

The petition stated, “On July 3, 2025, Chinnayya’s formal complaint and sworn affidavit triggered a Special Investigation Team (SIT) probe, leading to exhumations and the recovery of human remains and victims’ belongings substantiating grave allegations. “The National Human Rights Commission visited Dharmasthala in August, corroborating witness threats and intimidation faced by Chinnayya and his family.

“Despite consistent testimonies from villagers and public admissions by a Senior Karnataka Cabinet Minister on September 13, confirming the magnitude of mass burials as resembling a “battlefield,” subsequent SIT efforts face obstruction due to high-level pressure, risking suppression of further exhumations.” Lawyers representing victims now report harassment and intimidation by local police, threatening justice and the independence of legal counsel.

Witnesses and families are under severe threat, raising concerns about a breakdown in rule of law in Karnataka, the petition alleged. Meanwhile, Mahesh Shetty Thimarody, one of the activists raising his voice against temple authorities has formally submitted a detailed complaint to the National Human Rights Commission alleging “systematic police harassment, abuse of power, and malicious criminal prosecution aimed at silencing my voice and dismantling citizen-led movements.”

-IANS

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Union Home Minister Amit Shah Urges States, UTs To Intensify Crackdown On Drug Cartels And Collaborate With CBI

home minister amit shah

Union Home Minister Amit Shah has called on state and union territory officials to intensify efforts against drug trafficking by working closely with the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to trace, locate, and bring back fugitives managing drug networks from foreign countries.

Speaking at the Second National Conference of Anti-Narcotics Task Force (ANTF) Chiefs, Shah urged states and central agencies to escalate their crackdown on drug smuggling at every level from border-level cartels to local peddlers. The event, organized by the Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB), was attended by key officials from state police forces, central agencies, and intelligence units.

The fight against narcotics needs to move beyond just catching petty peddlers. We must strategically dismantle three major types of drug cartels those operating at the borders, those distributing drugs across states from the entry points, and those responsible for local-level retail, even up to paan shops,” Shah said.

He emphasized the importance of a multi-tiered action plan at both state and district levels, urging each state to devise targeted strategies for all cartel types. He also called for monthly participation from all departments, not just police forces, to contribute a day solely for anti-narcotics efforts.

Shah outlined a three-pronged approach to combat the drug menace, a strategic plan for reducing demand, a compassionate approach towards harm reduction, and zero-tolerance policy towards drug cartels.

He further stressed the urgency of bringing international drug criminals under Indian jurisdiction, stating that extradition and deportation are critical tools in this battle. “The CBI has made significant progress, and I encourage all ANTF heads to work in close coordination with CBI Director Praveen Sood to strengthen an effective extradition framework not just for drug-related cases, but also terrorism and gang crimes,” he said.

Shah also recommended a more flexible and practical deportation process to quickly remove foreign nationals involved in drug-related offenses. He suggested establishing a collaborative mechanism between the NCB, CBI, and state police to handle such cases more effectively.

According to an official familiar with the discussions, NCB Director General Anurag Garg emphasized the need for states and UTs to identify foreigners, particularly those overstaying their visas and suspected of engaging in drug trafficking. The official revealed that approximately 16,000 individuals from African nations are suspected to be living illegally in India, with a significant number believed to be involved in narcotics trade.

Shah also directed state governments to establish dedicated financial investigation units to follow the money trail, monitor hawala networks, check cryptocurrency transactions, and strengthen cyber surveillance of drug traffickers. He further recommended that every state set up a narcotics-focused forensic unit, which would assist in evidence collection and reduce the likelihood of offenders securing bail easily.

(With inputs from Hindustan Times)

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“Is It A Matter Of Life And Death? It Will Be Heard Tomorrow At 10 AM”, Delhi Court Refuses To Urgently Hear Paranjoy Guha Thakurta’s Plea Against Adani Gag Order

Delhi Court Refuses To Urgently Hear Paranjoy Guha Thakurta’s Plea Against Adani Gag Order

A Delhi court on Wednesday refused to urgently hear journalist Paranjoy Guha Thakurta’s appeal against a gag order restraining him from publishing alleged defamatory stories against Adani Enterprises Limited (AEL).

District Judge Rakesh Kumar Singh of the Rohini Court said that since the injunction order had been passed on 6 September 2025, the matter could be heard on 18 September 2025 (Thursday) rather than on Wednesday.

“It will be heard tomorrow at 10AM,” the judge ultimately said.

The case was initially listed before District Judge Sunil Chaudhary, but as he was on leave, it was transferred to Judge Singh.

During the proceedings, Judge Singh questioned the urgency of the matter and asked why it could not be heard by the regular judge.

“What if your client doesn’t publish for two days? Is it a matter of life and death? What if the published work is removed? Would the client’s business suffer? What if the case is heard tomorrow at 10 o’clock,” the Court remarked.

Appearing for Thakurta, Senior Advocate Trideep Pais argued that the lower court had passed an overbroad order without hearing him.

“The Court does not mention which part, URL is defamatory. Court has not shown what is that material which is false, defamatory and why it should be injuncted. It is the duty of the plaintiff to show what is defamatory and the Court to rule on what is defamatory,” he submitted.

On the other hand, Senior Advocate Anurag Ahluwalia, representing Adani Enterprises, said there was no urgency and that the matter should be heard by Judge Singh.

“There is another appeal coming tomorrow. There is no urgency,” Ahluwalia stated.

The court ultimately listed the matter for hearing on Thursday morning.

The September 6 Order

On September 6, Senior Civil Judge Anuj Kumar Singh of the Rohini Court had ordered removal of the defamatory content against AEL and directed journalists to refrain from publishing unverified or defamatory information about the company.

The order was passed not only against Thakurta but also against journalists Ravi Nair, Abir Dasgupta, Ayaskant Das, and Ayush Joshi.

The journalists then filed two separate challenges to the order. Thakurta’s plea was listed on Wednesday, while the case of the other journalists is expected to be taken up on Thursday.

Arguments of the Journalists

The journalists have maintained that Adani Enterprises Limited was not mentioned in their reports, which referred only to Gautam Adani or the Adani Group.

“It is submitted that a bare perusal of the reproduced portions of the alleged defamatory articles clearly reveals that at no place has the Plaintiff been called out, referred to, or even remotely mentioned. In each and every impugned publication, the references are confined exclusively to Mr. Gautam Adani or to the Adani Group,” the petition states.

Thakurta’s appeal further argued that the trial court had issued an “over-broad and all-encompassing restraining order” without specifying which particular content was defamatory.

Adani Enterprises’ Position

In the defamation suit before the civil judge, Adani Enterprises Limited alleged that certain journalists, activists, and organizations damaged its reputation and caused losses worth billions of dollars by tarnishing its image, brand equity, and the credibility of India’s global standing.

The company argued that these groups had “aligned with anti-India interests and have been continuously targeting Adani Enterprises’ infrastructure and energy projects which are critical to India’s infrastructure and energy security and have disrupted these projects with ulterior motives.”

AEL also pointed to articles published on paranjoy.in, adaniwatch.org, and adanifiles.com.au, claiming that these websites had repeatedly published defamatory content against the company, the Adani Group, and its founder and chairman, Gautam Adani.

(With inputs from Bar and Bench)

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Five Bangladeshi Students Suspended From NIT Silchar After Violent Campus Clash; Students To Leave India

Five Bangladeshi Students Suspended From NIT Silchar After Violent Campus Clash; Students To Leave India

Five Bangladeshi students enrolled at the National Institute of Technology (NIT) in Silchar have been suspended and directed to leave India following a violent clash on campus earlier this month.

According to institute authorities, the suspended students were studying in India under scholarships from the Indian Council for Cultural Relations (ICCR) and the Study in India (SII) program. With their academic suspension taking effect, they were expected to return to Bangladesh by 16 September 2025.

On 12 September 2025, NIT Silchar imposed academic suspension for two semesters on the five students and expelled them from the hostel. The disciplinary action followed a violent clash between two groups of Bangladeshi students on 8 September 2025, which left multiple students injured.

Institute Director Dilip Kumar Baidya confirmed the development, stating that the students’ departure was inevitable given the conditions of their visas. “Since their visas are tied to their academic activities and they are currently under suspension and expelled from the hostel, there’s nothing keeping them here,” he said. “They are set to leave either tonight or tomorrow. If they wish, they may return after the suspension period ends.”

Director Baidya further alleged that narcotic substances were discovered in the rooms of the suspended students, adding what he described as “another serious dimension” to the case. He maintained that there was “sufficient evidence to prove their active involvement in the campus violence, which led to their suspension for two semesters.”

Eyewitnesses described the 8 September 2025 incident as a targeted assault. According to one account, the attackers were armed with rods, knives, and screwdrivers and focused their violence on final-year Bangladeshi students. The clash reportedly lasted for nearly 30 minutes, leaving several students seriously injured.

The injured were taken to Silchar Medical College and Hospital (SMCH), where doctors confirmed that two students with severe head injuries required admission to the intensive care unit.

The institute has stated that the disciplinary action was necessary to restore order and ensure campus safety.

(With inputs from Organiser)

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

₹40 Crore Fraud In MobiKwik App: Six Arrested For Exploiting Glitch

A major fraud of around Rs 40 crore has raised serious concerns about the safety of fintech platforms after Gurugram Police arrested six people for exploiting a technical glitch in the MobiKwik app.  The incident has triggered calls for a deeper investigation into why such glitches are frequently occurring, putting millions of users at risk.

According to police, the glitch in the MobiKwik app allowed transactions to be recorded as successful even when users had insufficient balances in their bank accounts or wallets, or when incorrect passwords were entered. The accused allegedly misused this flaw to transfer money to their bank accounts, causing heavy losses of around Rs 40 crore. Industry experts said the MobiKwik case is not an isolated one.

In August, Policybazaar Insurance Brokers Private Limited also lodged a complaint with Gurugram Police after fraudsters impersonated its employees, forged documents, and misused the company’s ID cards and email IDs to cheat customers. In that case, at least 11 customers were duped into paying amounts ranging from Rs 8,510 to Rs 35,000, with the total fraud amounting to Rs 2.08 lakh. Experts warn that repeated cases of such technical flaws and fraudulent activities in fintech platforms could undermine consumer trust. They have urged regulatory bodies and government agencies like the ED and CBI to carry out a thorough probe into why these vulnerabilities continue to surface and whether there are deeper systemic risks involved.

In Mobikwik case, police officials said that about 2,500 bank accounts were linked to the fraud, all of which have now been frozen. Nearly Rs 8 crore has already been recovered. The six accused, identified as Rehan, Mohammad Sakil, Wakar Yunus, Wasim Akram, Mohammad Amir and Mohammad Ansar, were arrested from Gurgaon and sent to judicial custody after being produced in court. The fraud came to light after MobiKwik filed a complaint with Gurugram Police on September 13. The company had detected suspicious transactions during an internal audit a day earlier. Investigations revealed that some merchants registered on the platform, along with unknown individuals, misused the flaw to get funds credited despite failed transactions.

This resulted in wrongful gains for the accused and losses for the company. The police have registered a case under Sections 318(4) (cheating of a valuable security) and 314 (dishonest misappropriation of property) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). Officers said the probe is still on and more people involved may be identified as the investigation progresses. In an exchange filing, the company said that they are undertaking all possible and necessary efforts to recover the amount. However, since the police investigation and recovery efforts have just started, it’s not yet possible to ascertain the impact. “The company is taking aggressive collection efforts while pursuing legal course of action to recover the full amount over a period of time,” it added.

-IANS

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.