The National Crime Records Bureau’s (NCRB) 2023 report has exposed a “grim and troubling picture” for Tamil Nadu for a party that prides itself as champions of ‘social justice’. It reveals a stark contrast where a decline in overall violent crime masks a sharp and alarming surge in offenses against its most vulnerable citizen – Dalits and children.
A Statistical Surge in Atrocities
The report highlights a disturbing year-on-year increase in crimes against Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. Cases registered under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act rose from 1,761 in 2022 to 1,921 in 2023, a 9% jump. This surge appears even starker over a five-year horizon, with cases climbing 68% since 2019.
Similarly, crimes against children have followed an “upward trend,” with the state registering 6,968 cases in 2023, up from 6,580 the year before. The capital city, Chennai, mirrored this pattern, recording a jump from 54 to 573 cases. Experts warn that this trend reflects “serious gaps in social protection, policing, and child safety systems.”
Living A Lie, Massive Administrative Failure
Social activists Shalin Maria Lawrence and Vrinda Adige, speaking on a News9 panel moved beyond the statistics to indict the state’s law and order apparatus and political leadership.
The official statistics, provided by the state’s own Home Department, show a significant rise in registered cases. However, during analysis of these figures, a critical perspective emerged challenging the narrative that increased reporting indicates better law enforcement. Critics state that only minor statistical anomalies are acknowledged while rejecting the idea that improved reporting alone explains the surge.
A more alarming assessment suggested the official data represents just a fraction of actual crimes. Observers state that this number is the number that’s getting reported, but this is only one third of the actual cases and that is how it must be taken, indicating the true scale of violence may be three times higher than official records show.
Critics identified a pervasive culture of impunity as a primary driver of the increasing violence. The perception that offenders can escape justice through corruption is highlighted as a major concern. This perception is substantiated by abysmally low conviction rates, reported at just 5% for both SC/ST and women-related crimes. The poor conviction rate underscores systemic failures in the justice delivery mechanism, from investigation through prosecution.
The data and subsequent analysis reveal a state grappling with escalating violence against vulnerable communities, with official statistics potentially masking the true severity of the situation and systemic flaws enabling continued perpetration of crimes.
Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.
Kantara: Chapter 1 seems to have hit the leftists and “liberals” where it hurts for being openly Hindu and espousing Hindutva values.
A recent review by leftist “news” channel MediaOne, jittered by the film, came up with a review titled “കാന്താര ഒളിപ്പിക്കുന്ന ഹിന്ദുത്വ” meaning The Hidden Hindutva in Kantara.
This review video has been widely criticized for interpreting the film’s deep-rooted portrayal of indigenous Bhoota Kola traditions and land rights struggles through a narrow and divisive political lens.
Review Alleges Right-Wing Political Manipulation
In its analysis, the MediaOne review acknowledges the film’s visual grandeur and narrative scale but concludes that the world of Kantara ultimately serves to “help right-wing politics.” The review states, “That equation will apply to all films that manipulate all myths and legends in a way that helps right-wing politics,” alleging that the sequel includes “efforts to strengthen it further.”
It further claims that while the “Sangh Parivar co-existence is not visible at first glance,” such narratives serve to “entrench the same politics.”
Backlash Accuses Channel of Dividing Hindus
The review has been met with severe criticism from sections of the audience and cultural commentators who accuse MediaOne of intolerance towards the authentic depiction of Sanatana Dharma.
MediaOne TV is a Malayalam news channel operated by the Jamaat-e-Islami Hind, an Islamic organisation. MediaOne TV first received its license from the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (I&B Ministry) in 2011 and was launched in 2013.
This explains why the analysis is an expression of a “Jihadi System.” The channel and its team cannot seem to tolerate seeing Hindus united and thrilled by the cinematic portrayal of their religious and cultural roots.
The review had said “Making Panjurli and Guliga, only god for Hindus. Later, making them Sanghi.”
“Hidden Hindutva in Movie Kantara”
This is the headline given to the review program of Kantara movie in Malayalam news channel “Media One”…!!
This channel is owned by an organization called “Jamaat-e-Islami”
Critics feel this is how the leftist-Islamist ecosystem divides Hindus – they differentiated Hindus in the saffron color, the saffron flag, the rakhi, the saffron cloth, Lord Rama, Lord Hanuman etc.
MediaOne’s review frames the film as a vehicle for majoritarian politics, while its critics frame that very review as an intolerant attempt to discredit and divide Hindu cultural expression. The debate ensures that Kantara: Chapter 1 enters the public discourse not just as a film, but as a cultural flashpoint.
It is noteworthy that the same channel had propagated lies about the RSS and peddled lies along with the leftist news portal The News Minute during the Dharmasthala “mass burial” controversy.
About Jamaat-e-Islami Hind
Jamaat-e-Islami Hind, often referred to as the Jamaat is an Islamic political and social organization in India. It is part of the larger Jamaat-e-Islami movement, which was founded by Syed Abul Ala Maududi in British India in 1941. The Jamaat-e-Islami movement has a presence in several countries, and each branch operates independently in its respective nation. In fact, Maududi is acclaimed by the Muslim Brotherhood, Islamic Circle of North America, Hamas, and other Islamic organizations.
Here is a look at its activities.
Jamaat-e-Islami Hind held a “Palestine Solidarity Convention” on 13 October 2023 in Kerala’s Malappuram district, featuring Palestinian Ambassador Adnan Abu Alhaija and Gaza University Vice Chancellor Dr. Kamlain Shaa’ath. The event’s poster condemns “Zionist occupying terrorism.” The meeting coincides with Hamas leader Khalid Mashal’s global call for “jihad” following Israel’s Operation Iron Swords launched after Hamas’s deadly October 7 attack.
In October 2023, the Solidarity Youth Movement (Kerala Youth Wing of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind), invited Hamas founding member Khaled Mashal to speak where anti-Hindu slogans were raised. Khaled Mashal presented a video message of approximately 7 minutes in duration. In his sermon, Khalid reportedly asked the people present at the rally to extend unconditional support to Hamas and allegedly made anti-Hindu comments. The nature of the video address, whether it was live or pre-recorded, has not been confirmed.
After the Taliban’s takeover of Afghanistan in August 2021, Jamaat-e-Islami Hind (JIH) praised the development as a “restoration of peace and order.” JIH president Syed Sadatullah Husaini described the Taliban’s return as a victory of the Afghan people over “imperialist forces” and called the power transfer “peaceful.” He urged the Taliban to establish an Islamic welfare state that protects minorities and women’s rights.
At a Jamaat-e-Islami Hind event in Kerala in September 2024, state secretary Shihab Pookkottur claimed that major Indian landmarks, including Rashtrapati Bhavan and Jamia Millia, stand on Waqf land, asserting that related legal cases are ongoing. Speaking against the Waqf Amendment Bill, he said it threatens Islamic property rights and alleged widespread “encroachment” on Waqf assets. Pookkottur argued that Waqf properties are foundational to India, claiming “every corner of the country is Waqf land.” He described Waqf as central to Islamic civilization and accused society of harboring jealousy toward the Muslim community’s growth and development in Kerala.
Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.
The United Kingdom has been thrust into the spotlight as concerns over the safety of its Jewish community escalate, following a deadly terror attack outside a synagogue in Manchester. On Yom Kippur, the holiest day in the Jewish calendar, a terror attack occurred when a Jihadi drove his car into congregants before proceeding to stab two people to death and injuring three others. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer described the attack as a chilling reminder of the persistent threat of antisemitism, warning that hatred against Jews is “rising once again” and emphasizing the urgent need for national vigilance to protect Britain’s Jewish population.
UK – Growingly Unsafe For Jews
A British Jew took to X and made the following post calling for fellow Jews to leave the country. He wrote, “I am a British Jew… I left the UK last year out of fear for my family’s safety. Today, my worst fears were confirmed. But the writing was on the wall. When Muslim thugs drove through our neighbourhoods screaming they were going to rape our daughters… no one was jailed. When a Muslim thug tried to stab Jews at our kosher supermarket… he wasn’t jailed. When British streets were flooded by mobs screaming globalise the intifada… the home secretary joined them. Meanwhile Jews were told to leave because our presence was “provocative”. The British government and police have Jewish blood on their hands. To my friends and family… leave while you still can.”
I am a British Jew… I left the UK last year out of fear for my family’s safety.
Today, my worst fears were confirmed.
But the writing was on the wall.
When Muslim thugs drove through our neighbourhoods screaming they were going to rape our daughters… no one was jailed.
When…
— Israel Advocacy Movement (@israel_advocacy) October 2, 2025
Given the recent incidents and the Jihadist attacks on Jews in the United Kingdom, the fears of this handle are not unfounded.
Let’s take a look at the recent attacks on Jews and the larger community in the country.
Increasing Anti-Semitic Attacks
The synagogue terror attack in Manchester is not the lone incident that took place in the recent days targeting the Jewish community.
Here is a list of instances where Jews were targeted for their faith/community.
#1 Heaton Park Hebrew Congregation Synagogue Attack (Manchester, 2 October 2025)
On Yom Kippur morning, a 35-year-old British national of Syrian descent drove his car into pedestrians outside the synagogue, then stabbed the on-site security guard. Two worshippers were killed and three others seriously injured before armed officers shot the assailant dead. Greater Manchester Police have classified the incident as a terrorist act.
#2 Rising Physical Assaults Recorded by CST (First Half 2025)
The CST documented 1,521 antisemitic incidents nationwide from January to June 2025, including 315 assaults on visibly Jewish individuals and 223 incidents targeting synagogues or congregants. Of these assaults, 86 involved offenders in vehicles, and 97 incorporated explicit threats.
#3 Surge in Assaults and Threats (2024)
In 2024, Britain experienced its second-highest annual total of antisemitic incidents, with over 3,500 reported. The CST recorded 121 cases of physical assault, 223 synagogue-related incidents, and 260 school-related antisemitic cases, alongside more than 1,240 instances of online hatred.
#4 Incidents Linked to Public Demonstrations (2025)
Throughout 2025, at least 33 antisemitic incidents occurred at or en route to anti-Israel demonstrations in Westminster, involving placard-wielders and individuals shouting threats at Jewish passersby. A further 21 incidents targeted Jewish organisations during these events.
Grooming gangs in the United Kingdom emerged as a major social and criminal issue over the past two decades, drawing significant media attention and public outrage. These gangs typically targeted vulnerable children and teenagers, often from marginalized communities, using manipulation, coercion, and psychological control to exploit them for sexual purposes. Victims were frequently lured with gifts, attention, or false promises, before being subjected to sexual abuse and sometimes criminal activities.
Several high-profile cases, including those in Rotherham, Rochdale, and Oxford, revealed systemic failures in addressing the abuse. In Rotherham alone, an estimated 1,400 children were sexually exploited over a 16-year period, with local authorities accused of failing to act due to fears of being labeled racist, as a majority of the perpetrators were of Pakistani heritage. The scandal exposed gaps in law enforcement, social services, and child protection protocols, prompting nationwide investigations and reforms.
Critics argued that authorities were slow to respond, citing political correctness and bureaucratic inertia as key factors. In response, the UK government implemented stricter safeguarding policies, increased funding for victim support services, and launched initiatives to improve inter-agency coordination. Awareness campaigns also aimed to educate communities about the signs of grooming and the importance of early intervention.
Despite these efforts, grooming gangs remain a pressing concern because the authorities failed to recognise the people behind the grooming gangs for what they are.
Allowing the jihadis to breed and thrive in their country has led to the present situation of the United Kingdom where their own people feel fear and want to leave.
This has been furthered by the election of Islamist leaders in positions of power. Let us take a look at them.
Muslim Politicians And Elected Officials In The United Kingdom
Muslims make up approximately 6.5% of Britain’s population (3.4 million people), while Muslim MPs represent about 4% of Parliament. The increasing political participation of British Muslims reflects the growing problems in UK politics – the community seems to refuse to integrate in the cultural fabric of the UK while trying to push Sharia on the mainstream English.
Here is a list of Muslim politicians in power in the UK.
A record number of 25 Muslims were elected to the UK Parliament in 2024, representing the most diverse parliament in British history. This includes:
Labour Party MPs (18 total):
Dr. Zubair Ahmed – Glasgow South West
Sadik Al-Hassan – North Somerset
Rushanara Ali – Bethnal Green & Stepney
Tahir Ali – Birmingham Hall Green
Dr. Rosena Allin-Khan – Tooting
Apsana Begum – Poplar & Limehouse
Dr. Rupa Huq – Ealing Central & Acton
Imran Hussain – Bradford East
Afzal Khan – Manchester Rusholme
Naushabah Khan – Gillingham & Rainham
Shabana Mahmood – Birmingham Ladywood (Secretary of State for Justice/Lord Chancellor)
Abtisam Mohammed – Sheffield Central
Yasmin Qureshi – Bolton South & Walkden
Naz Shah – Bradford West
Tulip Siddiq – Hampstead & Highgate (Economic Secretary to the Treasury)
Sadiq Khan – Mayor of London (since 2016), serving his third term as the first Muslim mayor of London. Khan oversees a budget of approximately £20.4 billion and manages transport, policing, and housing across the capital.
Ceremonial Mayors (Recent Appointments)
Several appointments were made in 2025:
Shahin Ashraf MBE – First Muslim woman mayor of Solihull (appointed May 2024)
Mohammed Asaduzzaman – First South Asian Muslim mayor of Brighton and Hove (appointed May 2024)
Mayor of Sandwell – First Muslim mayor appointed in 2025
Local Councillors
Over 200 Muslims currently serve in British local government across various councils. Key concentrations include:
Tower Hamlets (London): 30 Muslim councillors
Bradford: 24 Muslim councillors
Birmingham: 17 Muslim councillors
Recent local elections in May 2024 saw 39 Muslim candidates win seats across 24 local authorities out of 134 who stood for election.
Historical Context
The first Muslim elected official in Britain was Bashir Maan, who became a Glasgow City Councillor in the 1970s after emigrating from Pakistan in 1953. The first Muslim MP was elected in 1997, followed by the first Muslim life peer in the House of Lords in 1998. Shahid Malik became the first Muslim government minister in 2007 as Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for International Development.
Current Government Positions
Several Muslims hold ministerial positions in the current government:
Shabana Mahmud – Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor
Tulip Siddiq – Economic Secretary to the Treasury
Rushanara Ali – Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government
UK Becoming Unsafe For Jewish Communities
Based on the above, it is clear that the United Kingdom is facing a profound and systemic crisis regarding the safety of its Jewish community. The horrific Yom Kippur synagogue attack in Manchester is not an isolated event but the culmination of a deeply troubling trend of rising antisemitic violence, intimidation, and institutional failure.
The fears expressed by British Jews are a direct consequence of this escalating environment. This atmosphere has been fostered by the alarming rise in jihadist-inspired attacks and public incitement, and a concerning political trajectory that has seen individuals with documented histories of anti-Israel and divisive stances elevated to the highest offices of law and order and national security.
The appointment of figures such as Shabana Mahmud, who describes her Islamic faith as the “absolute driver of everything” she does and has a record of supporting the BDS movement and opposing the deportation of foreign criminals to the pivotal role of Home Secretary, despite these controversies, signals a troubling shift in the UK’s political landscape. This, combined with the record number of Muslim politicians attaining power, many of whom represent constituencies and hold views that appear at odds with the integration and security of the Jewish community, has created a palpable sense of vulnerability among British Jews.
When the streets witness mobs chanting “globalize the intifada,” when grooming gangs have operated with impunity due to political correctness, and when the government’s response has been inadequate or conflicted, the conclusion is inescapable: the foundational security and cultural identity of Britain is in danger. Without a decisive and unequivocal reversal of these trends rooted in robust security measures, political accountability, and a reaffirmation of British values over divisive identity politics, the fear that the UK is growing increasingly unsafe for Jews will not only persist but will become a tragic reality.
Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.
Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi (VCK) chief Thol. Thirumavalavan has built his political career branding himself as the uncompromising voice of Dalits and an independent force in Tamil Nadu politics. But in reality, he has steadily reduced his party into nothing more than a loyal extension of the DMK singing paeans and butteressing when his own people has been at the receiving end of the Stalin governments’s failures. Whether it is liquor prohibition, Dalit atrocities, police brutality, or even the Karur stampede, Thirumavalavan’s responses follow a predictable script: soft-pedalling DMK’s failures, inventing scapegoats, and deflecting blame to the BJP. For a leader who claims to champion “independent” Dalit politics, his record speaks of nothing but subservience.
In the name of alliance dharma or what seems like subservitude, Thirumavalvan has never criticised the DMK but instead has blamed the BJP despite them not being in the picture in the first place!
Take for example, the recent Karur TVK rally stampede. Instead of questioning the DMK over the crowd mismanagement or holding the TVK responsible for the crowd swell, Thirumavalvan has chosen to blame the BJP for the chaos and tragedy.
Thirumavalavan accused the BJP of “underground dealing” to shield Vijay from police action, arguing that “the BJP is trying to save Vijay” while ordinary people bear the brunt of law enforcement.
Let us take a look at some of the instances where Thirumavalavan has done the same.
The Vengaivayal Case
In the Vengaivayal case involving fecal contamination of water tanks in a Dalit colony, Thirumavalavan initially criticized the CB-CID investigation but took a notably restrained approach compared to his usual activism. Despite VCK announcing statewide protests in February 2025, Thirumavalavan limited his demands to requesting a judicial inquiry rather than completely breaking with DMK.
While expressing dissatisfaction with the CB-CID chargesheet that named three Dalits as accused, Thirumavalavan met CM Stalin personally and submitted a memorandum seeking a one-man inquiry commission. This measured approach contrasted sharply with the fury expressed by affected Dalits who were in “closed-door protest”.
Liquor Prohibition Issue (2024-2025)
In September 2024, Thirumavalavan harshly criticized DMK for not implementing total prohibition despite their 2016 election promise, calling it an “anti-national act”. However, after meeting with CM Stalin in September 2024, he changed his stance significantly. Following his meeting with Stalin, Thirumavalavan announced that DMK would participate in VCK’s anti-liquor conference and stated “there are no issues whatsoever in ties between his party and the DMK”. He defended Stalin by saying the CM conveyed that “there was no difference of opinion in bringing prohibition into force” and accepted the government’s “phased manner” approach.
Ultimately, he said that they will present the petition to the central government to ban liquor in the country, implying that it was the BJP-led central government that was responsible for the whole alcohol-related mess in the state.
Sanitary Workers’ Protests (August 2025)
When DMK-run municipal authorities deployed police against protesting sanitary workers, BJP leaders attacked VCK for its silence. Thirumavalavan countered by blaming the BJP’s previous governments for privatizing essential services and accused them of hypocrisy: “I am not defending DMK, but why this double standard?”.
When Thirumavalavan’s “share in power” video went viral and was initially deleted from his social media, raising speculation about alliance tensions, he quickly clarified his position. He emphasized it was a “long-standing ideological standpoint” and assured that VCK would remain with DMK.
Flagpole Removal (September 2024)
In Madurai, local authorities removed a 62-foot flagpole of the Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi (VCK), originally erected to commemorate the party’s founding by Thol Thirumavalavan. Officials cited road expansion as the reason, though VCK leaders insisted the reinstalled pole followed all rules. On 13 September 2024, police again dismantled the relocated post, sparking protests from party functionaries who accused the district administration of targeting them. Thirumavalavan condemned Collector M.S. Sangeetha, alleging deliberate harassment of VCK. While criticizing the administration, he also sought intervention from DMK ministers, reflecting his balancing act between opposition politics and ties with the ruling party.
Rejecting Opposition Overtures (November 2024)
Despite hints from AIADMK and speculation about VCK switching sides, Thirumavalavan firmly rejected rumors in November 2024, stating: “Our alliance with the DMK is unconditional” and “No need has arisen to discuss an alliance”.
Fear of Hindutva Compromising Progressive Values (August 2025)
In a broader ideological critique, he warned that fear of the BJP’s Hindutva politics was “pushing the Left and VCK to compromise on progressive values,” effectively placing responsibility on the BJP’s polarizing agenda rather than on DMK policies
Defending DMK on Vijay-TVK Issues (October 2025)
In the recent Karur stampede case involving actor Vijay’s rally, Thirumavalavan criticized police for not acting against Vijay while filing cases against others. However, rather than attacking DMK directly, he raised questions about “underground dealing between DMK and Vijay” while simultaneously alleging that “BJP is trying to save Vijay”.
Despite expressing frustration that “even while being in the ruling alliance, we are being targeted”, Thirumavalavan consistently chooses alliance preservation, stating: “politics cannot be based on one or two incidents. We have to think about the broader good of Tamil Nadu”.
At this point, Thirumavalavan can no longer pretend to be an independent Dalit leader. His politics has been reduced to providing cover fire for the DMK while posturing as a radical. Every time the ruling party is cornered, he steps in to shift the blame onto the BJP or invent a conspiracy. If Thirumavalavan cannot speak truth to power in Tamil Nadu, he has no business running a party that claims to represent Dalit interests. The honest thing for him to do would be to either shut down VCK or rename it for what it has become — the DMK Dalit Wing.
Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has strongly criticized Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) leaders in connection with the Karur stampede, which claimed 41 lives, noting that party chief Vijay “fled from the scene of occurrence” and that the party had not expressed any remorse. The court condemned the conduct, particularly given that women and children were among the victims.
The bench observed that this reflected the “mental state” of the actor-politician. Justice Senthilkumar remarked that the stampede had been mishandled and expressed concern over what he described as the state showing leniency towards Vijay.
Questioning both the organisers and the police, Justice Senthilkumar asked, “As an event organiser, don’t you have any responsibility?” The court expressed anguish over the perceived leniency towards Vijay and noted that he “vanished” from the spot when the incident occurred.
The court directed the formation of a Special Investigation Team (SIT) headed by senior IPS officer Asra Garg to probe the incident, while reserving orders on the anticipatory bail petitions filed by TVK leaders Bussy Anand and CTR Nirmal Kumar.
During the anticipatory bail hearing, the state argued that the stampede had been triggered by the conduct of the party’s own cadre and that the leaders had behaved irresponsibly.
The bench highlighted the gravity of the incident, saying that a massive man-made disaster had caused the death of 41 innocent people, adding that the court could not “close its eyes”, be a “mute spectator” or “shirk its responsibilities.”
Referring to video footage, the bench noted, “Two-wheelers were caught under a TVK bus, yet the driver did not stop despite witnessing it. Is it not a case of hit and run?” They further questioned the police, asking, “Why was a case of hit and run not registered? Why have the police failed to take cognisance of it?”
The court also raised concerns over a controversial post by party leader Aadhav Arjuna, asking sharply, “Is Aadhav Arjuna above the law? Will you take action only if the Court directs?” Action against Aadhav Arjuna has now been directed.
Simultaneously, the court is considering a public interest litigation (PIL) seeking to restrain the Home Secretary and the Director General of Police from granting permission for road shows until comprehensive guidelines or standard operating procedures (SOPs) are put in place.
Senior counsel V Raghavachari, representing Bussy Anand and CTR Nirmal Kumar, argued that the petitioners had no intention of harming their own cadres and that the incident could not be treated as culpable homicide. He accused the police of failing to provide adequate protection, noting that the venue was not chosen by the petitioners. “If Velusamypuram was objectionable, the police ought to have rejected the petitioners’ request,” he said, adding that the crowd went out of control only after a lathi charge and questioning its necessity.
Raghavachari maintained that the petitioners had complied with regulations and pointed out that permission for the event had been granted only a day before. “The responsibility of managing the crowd lies entirely with the State,” he said, insisting that the gathering was orderly until police intervention. He further alleged that chemicals had been thrown at the crowd, causing people to faint. The counsel stressed that the official organiser and TVK district secretary, Mathiyazhagan, had already been arrested, and maintained that Anand and Nirmal Kumar bore no responsibility.
Additional Advocate General J Ravindran countered that TVK had misled the crowd by tweeting that the event would begin at 12 noon, although police permission was granted for 3 pm to 7 pm. He added that 559 police personnel had been deployed for the TVK rally, in contrast to 137 personnel for AIADMK chief Edappadi K Palanisamy’s campaign at the same venue days earlier.
Kerala-based jewellery giant Malabar Gold & Diamonds is embroiled in a significant controversy following its decision to extend a VIP invitation to a known anti-India and pro-Pakistan social media influencer for the inauguration of its newly expanded showroom in Birmingham, UK. The event, held on 6 September 2025 and headlined by Bollywood actress Kareena Kapoor Khan, has drawn sharp criticism for the company’s association with Alishba Khalid, an Instagram influencer with a history of posting virulently anti-India content.
Malabar Gold UK is collaborating with Pakistani influencers who don’t care for Indian followers and calling ‘Operation Sindoor’ a cowardly act!
The controversy centres on Khalid’s social media activity, particularly her posts from May 2025 condemning India’s ‘Operation Sindoor’. In now-deleted but widely circulated posts, she labelled the operation a “cowardly act,” accused India of hypocrisy, and ended with “PAKISTAN ZINDABAD.” In another post, she explicitly stated, “I know 60% of my followers are from India and to be honest, I don’t care anymore,” and concluded with a prayer for Pakistan’s protection from harm and evil. A further post from May 7 threatened, “Just wait now our turn will come. And we will answer with truth and unshakable strength.”
Sends Legal Notice Instead Of Apology
Facing a massive public backlash and accusations of sympathising with Pakistan, Malabar Gold, owned by M.P. Ahammed, has taken a legal route instead of issuing a public apology. The company filed a suit in the Bombay High Court, seeking an injunction to remove what it termed “defamatory” social media posts connecting the brand to the influencer’s political views.
In a hearing on 29 September 2025, before Justice Sandeep V. Marne, the company’s counsel argued that the engagement of Khalid was arranged through a third-party agency, JAB Studios, and was finalized much prior to the Pahalgam attack and her subsequent controversial posts. The plaintiff contended that they were unaware of her connections to Pakistan and her anti-India stance at the time of hiring and have since discontinued her services. They alleged that the online campaign was a strategic move by competitors to damage their business during the festive season.
The court granted an ad-interim injunction in favour of Malabar Gold, ordering the listed social media platforms (Defendant Nos. 1 to 7) to pull down the 442 URLs identified by the company and restraining them from permitting further publication of such material. The ruling has intensified the debate, with critics arguing the company is attempting to silence public outrage over its poor vetting process rather than addressing the core issue of its association with a figure who has openly celebrated violence against India.
Instead of being ashamed, the Malabar group owned by M P Ahammed reached court.
They are sending notice to all those who have highlighted their recruitment of a Pakistani Instagram influencer who has mocked our Operation Sindoor.
A few days ago, a video of a group of people from the Aintham Tamilar Sangam burning an effigy of Lord Rama went viral on social media.
Following immense pressure from BJP Youth Wing Tamil Nadu, the Tiruchirappalli District Police have arrested four individuals for allegedly burning an effigy of the Hindu deity Lord Ram and circulating a video of the act on social media. The arrests were made following the registration of a case under the new Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).
The incident occurred on September 28 during an event organized by the “Aintham Tamilar Sangam” in Ayanputhur village. According to a police press release, a flex banner featuring an image of Lord Ram was beaten with sandals, set on fire, and the act was filmed. The video, which surfaced on a Facebook page called “Aintham Tamilar” on September 30, showed participants chanting “Praise Ravana” and included contact numbers for the organization.
Based on a complaint from a social media monitoring officer, the Cyber Crime police registered a case (FIR No. 18/25) on October 2. The charges include sections 192, 196(1)(a), 197, 299, 302, and 353(2) of the BNS, related to intent to provoke a breach of peace, outraging religious feelings, and criminal intimidation.
The first accused, Aadikalaraj from Pudukkottai District, was arrested on October 2. Three others—Thilakeswaran (Ramanathapuram), Napoleon (Namakkal), and Vasanthakumar (Kallakurichi)—were arrested and sent to judicial custody on October 3. The police have confirmed that the investigation is ongoing and more arrests are possible.
Trichy District Superintendent of Police, Mr. S. Selvanagarathnam, issued a stern warning that strict legal action will be taken against anyone posting or sharing content on social media that incites riots, disrupts public peace, or hurts religious sentiments.
Following immense pressure from @BJYMinTN , the DMK Govt. has finally arrested the 4 miscreants who burnt the effigy of Lord #Ram.
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court on Friday reserved orders on anticipatory bail pleas filed by Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) functionaries N Anand alias ‘Bussy’ Anand and CTR Nirmal Kumar in connection with the Karur stampede that killed 41 people during the party’s rally on 27 September 2025.
Justice M Jothiraman heard the petitions, where the two leaders face charges under provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (culpable homicide not amounting to murder, attempt to commit culpable homicide, acts endangering life or safety, and disobedience to public order) as well as the Tamil Nadu Public Property (Prevention of Damage and Loss) Act.
Senior counsel V Raghavachari, representing the petitioners, called the case a “concocted one” and argued that no intention could be attributed to them. He said the tragedy was due to police mishandling, not negligence by TVK. He maintained that the authorities had granted permission for the meeting, but the crowd was unexpectedly large. “No policeman was near the crowd… My leader comes at 6 pm, people wanted to see him. I expected police to provide protection,” he said, alleging that police lathi charge and even use of chemicals caused panic.
Justice Senthilkumar questioned both the organisers and the police over responsibility, asking, “As an event organiser, don’t you have any responsibility?” The court expressed anguish over what it described as state leniency towards Vijay and observed that he “vanished” from the spot when the incident occurred.
“I am not the event organiser. The event organiser has been arrested. If any incident takes place at a DMK rally, can the secretary be arrested? I am saying the event was orderly conducted till the police indulged in lathi charge. The entire issue is why do they rope me? The fact that I (referring to Anand) was an ex-MLA or that I am getting support should not be an intimidatory factor before any ruling party,” Raghavachari replied.
He added, “My lordship may grant me (petitioners) protection. I will be before them (police) from morning to the evening. But should I be humiliated like this by making an accused?” The State, meanwhile, asserted that the tragedy that took place because TVK’s leaders behaved irresponsibly.
“As General Secretary, he (Anand) made the request to the media and his cadre that the leader is coming, so the people should be there by 12 o’clock. Has he made a single statement in the media that people should behave responsibly? Not even a single announcement took place that the crowd should stay disciplined. What is the step taken by them? Was there any public announcement by the General Secretary or Join Secretary?” the State counsel contended.
While responding to the Court’s query on whether children and women were part of the crowd which gathered during the rally, the State’s lawyer added, “No arrangements were made for them. Not even a single water bottle was available. Police can’t give drinking water, they (TVK) have to do it. Of course, it is unfortunate incident but these people have not taken care of their own cadres, they absconded from the scene. None of these petitioners were available. Is it expected of the responsible people to do this?”
Additional Advocate General J Ravindran, opposing the pleas, said negligence and recklessness were clear. “We know it is not intentional, that is why we invoked 304 part 2. But these people didn’t care for their own cadres. They absconded while police rescued victims.” He added that TVK failed to provide water or basic amenities, and misleadingly tweeted the rally would start at noon despite permission only from 3 pm to 7 pm.
The AAG said post-mortem reports confirmed deaths were due to dehydration and asphyxia. He stressed that the investigation was at an early stage and the petitioners’ role must be examined, noting 559 police personnel had been deployed compared to 137 for a recent AIADMK rally.
The court also heard petitions for a CBI probe, protocols for rallies, and enhanced victim compensation. It declined a CBI probe, recorded the State’s assurance that no rallies will be allowed on highways until SOPs are framed, and directed the constitution of an SIT led by senior IPS officer Asra Garg.
Justice Jothiraman reserved orders on the anticipatory bail petitions of Anand and Nirmal Kumar.
A few days ago, the news of TN police officers sexually assaulting a young woman sent shockwaves across the state. However, instead of questioning the Dravidian Model DMK government and its “fantastic” law and order, woke radical ultra-feminist Chinmayi Sripaada chose to blame, of all things, Hinduism, for the crime.
What Happened?
Two police officers were arrested on 30 September 2025 for the alleged sexual assault of a young woman from Andhra Pradesh in a shocking incident that has sent waves of outrage through the district.
The accused, identified as Sub-Inspector Suresh Raj and Constable Sundar attached to the Tiruvannamalai East Police Station, were taken into custody following a formal complaint by the victim.
According to preliminary reports, the incident occurred on the Enthal Bypass Road where the two officers were stationed for vehicle inspection duty. A small cargo vehicle carrying fruits from Andhra Pradesh, with two sisters as passengers, was stopped for routine inspection.
The police allegedly separated the two siblings during the inspection. In a deeply disturbing turn of events, the officers are accused of taking the women to a nearby grove in the Enthal area where one of them was sexually assaulted in the presence of her sister.
After the alleged assault, the officers reportedly threatened the women before leaving the scene. The victim was subsequently admitted to the Tiruvannamalai Government Medical College Hospital for medical treatment and examination, with additional police security deployed at the facility.
Local authorities have confirmed the arrest of both police personnel and stated that a serious investigation is underway. The police are actively interrogating the accused officers to establish the complete sequence of events and determine the extent of the crime.
Chinmayi’s Rant About Hinduism
Despite knowing that the Dravidian model law and order has deteriorated beyond repair, questioning the ruling DMK government is something the likes of Chinmayi would not do. Here is what she commented about the horrific rape: “The girls were taking harvested banana stalks in a minivan from Andhra Pradesh and got raped by constables in Tamilnadu. Quite telling of our Women-Are-Goddess culture during Navaratri.”
Unfortunately, the gruesome crime took place during the festival of Navaratri, Chinmayi’s focus was on the “patriarchial” nature of the festival and not once on the ruling establishment.
If it was the church that was in question, this was how she would respond – always pontificate about Hinduism and indulge in whataboutery.
Had the tables turned, had the state been Uttar Pradesh where this crime took place, Chinmayi would have gone bonkers. Here is an example of how she writes her comments if the rape occurs in UP.
Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.
The National Crime Records Bureau’s (NCRB) “Crime in India 2023” report has revealed stark regional disparities in crime statistics, with Communist-ruled Kerala recording the highest crime rate in the nation while Uttar Pradesh maintained a crime rate significantly lower than the national average.
Kerala registered an alarming 1,631.2 crimes per lakh population, the highest among all states and nearly five times the national average of 335.3. This places the southern state at the top of India’s crime chart, followed closely by Delhi among union territories with 1,602 cases per lakh population.
In contrast, Uttar Pradesh, despite reporting the highest absolute number of crimes against women at 66,381 cases, demonstrated a significantly lower crime rate of 58.6 cases per one lakh female population compared to the national average of 66.2. When considering overall crime metrics, Uttar Pradesh’s crime rate stood at 335.3 per lakh population, well below the national average of 448.3.
The data shows Uttar Pradesh ranked 13th among 28 states when measured by crime rate against women and 17th when compared to all 36 states and union territories combined. Several states reported substantially higher crime rates than Uttar Pradesh, including Telangana (124.9), Rajasthan (114.8), and Haryana (110.3).
Uttar Pradesh’s Director General of Police Rajeev Krishna attributed the state’s relatively better performance to Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath’s zero-tolerance approach to crime. “The high case numbers reflect the size of the state, but the lower crime rate suggests that increased police visibility, targeted safety schemes, and dedicated helplines are mitigating the per-capita risk,” Krishna stated.
The state government credits initiatives like Mission Shakti, which focuses on women’s empowerment and safety through helplines, fast-track complaint redressal, and awareness drives, for the improved metrics. Authorities argue that the relatively lower crime rate also indicates growing confidence among women to report crimes that previously went unregistered.
The NCRB data breakdown shows that most crimes against women in Uttar Pradesh were committed by known individuals, with domestic violence comprising 34% of cases. Other significant categories included assault on women with intent to outrage modesty (20%), rape cases (8%), and cybercrimes against women (9%).
Beyond the Uttar Pradesh-Kerala comparison, the report highlighted concerning trends elsewhere. Delhi recorded a sharp decline in conviction rates, dropping from 87.8% in 2022 to 78.1% in 2023. Bengaluru reported the lowest chargesheeting rate for kidnapping cases among metropolitan cities at just 3.8%, with 1,139 of the 1,203 kidnapping victims being children.
Nationally, the report showed significant improvements in security parameters, with cases of extremist violence dropping sharply from 446 in 2022 to 163 in 2023. Jihadi terrorism cases fell by 87%, while Left-wing extremism declined by over 44% and North-East insurgency by 61%.
The contrasting pictures presented by Kerala’s high crime rate and Uttar Pradesh’s below-average statistics underscore how population scale and regional governance approaches influence crime patterns across India’s diverse states.
