Thirumavalavan, the leader of the Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi (VCK), which is part of the DMK alliance, has once again sparked controversy over Thiruvalluvar.
Thirumavalavan had said in a meeting that, Venugopal Sharma, who first painted the image of Thiruvalluvar, was a Brahmin, and so, he had drawn Thiruvalluvar with the sacred thread. Seeing this, Karunanidhi said, ‘Thiruvalluvar should not be confined to one caste; He is common to all.’ He then went on to severe the thread off the images and statues of Thiruvalluvar.
The truth, on the other hand, was that this was not to depict poonool, the sacred thread adorned by Brahmins, but a thin cotton thread that was depicted around his neck. When Vinayak V Sriram, son of Venugopal Sharma was asked by Dinamalar about this, he said, ‘My father did not draw Thiruvalluvar’s picture in one day. It took 12 years of intense effort, drawing and improving, and now he then came up with the picture that we all see and admire today. Even Bharathidasan had praised my father for being the first person to give a face to the name Valluvar that had not been present for the last 2,000 years.’
He added that Bharathidasan had requested him to remove the cotton thread that Sharma had drawn around Thiruvalluvar’s neck, saying that this would make him a caste symbol. The latter had then made the appropriate changes. This happened in 1959. Vinayak said that following the changes made, great leaders like Annathurai, Kamaraj, Kakkan, Jeeva and Kannadasan praised his father for his artwork. In 1964, Bhagavatsalam, who was the Chief Minister, unveiled the Valluvar painting drawn by his father in the assembly. Then, in 1967, Chief Minister Annathurai issued a decree to place Sharma’s portrait of Valluvar in government offices.
Vinayak went on to say that while the poonool was something that is worn across one’s shoulder, his father’s depiction was entirely different. He concluded saying that Thirumavalavan was unnecessarily dragging Karunanidhi into this matter without any reason. Vinayak added that even Congress’ PEter Alphonse had had a similar query that he had later clarified.
Historian, Sami Thiagarajan commented on this matter, saying, “During the Bhakthavathsalam tenure, Valluvar’s portrait was unveiled in the assembly. Then, in 1966, at the Sivasamy Road in Mylapore, President Radhakrishnan unveiled the statue of Thiruvalluvar. This statue was actually based on a painting by Venugopal Sharma. In that statue, there is no presence of poonool, the sacred thread. Therefore, it has nothing to do with Venugopal Sharma’s actual painting of Thiruvalluvar, the former’s caste or Karunanidhi. A leader like Thirumavalavan ought to know the complete history of events before publicly commenting about a figure of such great historical significance.”
Click here to subscribe to The Commune on Telegram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.
VCK’s manifesto, its anti-Hinduism and anti-development
Thirumavalavan, the leader of the Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi (VCK) and a member of the DMK alliance, published his party manifesto for the 2021 Tamil Nadu assembly elections in a private hotel in Villuppuram on March 25, 2021. The manifesto included divisive anti-Hindu remarks and economically radical viewpoints that made the political audience and the general public frown.
According to the VCK’s manifesto, if elected to office, it would nationalise all temple lands and distribute them to poor Tamil farmers. Why should only Hindu temple lands be nationalised and distributed to poor farmers is a fundamental issue. Why not the lands of Mosques and Church? This isn’t the first time that Mr. Thirumavalavan or his party has made divisive remarks about Hinduism. On November 13, 2019 VCK Chief Thirumavalavan in a public meeting said, “If the building has a dome, it is a mosque; if it is tall and straight, it is a church; and if it has dirty idols/dolls, it is a temple”.
It was thought at the time that Thirumavalavan made these controversial remarks in order to divert attention away from Stalin’s MISA controversy. This raises the question of who is using religion to defend their political interests. This demonstrates the bigotry of ostensibly secular groups.
Another point in the manifesto said “ The party will take action to completely shut down Kaattupalli Port”. Even the protesters in Ennore region opposed only the expansion of the port and did not make any demands for a complete shut down of the Kaatupalli port. The spread of a failed communist ideology, based on which they demand the closure of ports, factories, and other development projects, is having a negative effect on Tamil Nadu’s growth story. This not only has an effect on established firms, but it also creates an adverse market climate. The ease of doing business in Tamil Nadu is declining as the number of politically motivated protests sees a sharp increase.
Finally, a point in the manifesto deserves special consideration. According to the statement, the party would work to pass legislation requiring women to hold 50 percent of seats in all legislative bodies. It is worth noting that the VCK has not fielded a single woman candidate in any of the six seats it is contesting in Tamil Nadu.
Click here to subscribe to The Commune on Telegram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.