Facebook Instagram X Youtube
Tuesday, August 25, 2026
Facebook Instagram X Youtube
Home Blog Page 1037

Lok Sabha Elections 2024: Here’s How You Can Report Model Code Of Conduct Violations

By
The Commune
-

As India braces itself for the upcoming Lok Sabha elections, the Election Commission of India (ECI) has set the stage by announcing a comprehensive schedule spanning seven phases, commencing from 19 April 2024 and concluding on 1 June 2024. The much-awaited results are slated to be announced on 4 June 2024. With this announcement, the Model Code of Conduct (MCC) has been brought into effect, marking the initiation of stringent guidelines aimed at ensuring fair and ethical conduct during the electoral process.

Chief Election Commissioner Rajiv Kumar has underscored the imperative for all political parties and their leaders to scrupulously adhere to the MCC. The MCC, a cornerstone of India’s electoral framework, delineates a set of dos and don’ts for political entities and candidates in the lead-up to elections. It encompasses a gamut of regulations pertaining to speeches, polling procedures, election manifestos, and overall conduct, with the overarching objective of facilitating transparent and unbiased elections.

The MCC, effective from the announcement of the election schedule until the declaration of results, comprises eight key provisions addressing various facets of electoral conduct. Notably, it prohibits the exploitation of caste and communal sentiments to sway voters and precludes the use of places of worship for electioneering purposes. Furthermore, acts such as bribery, intimidation, and voter impersonation are unequivocally barred, underscoring the ECI’s commitment to upholding the integrity of the electoral process.

One of the pivotal stipulations of the MCC is the enforcement of a 48-hour period of “election silence” preceding the closing of polls. This temporal hiatus is intended to afford voters a tranquil environment for contemplation before exercising their franchise, devoid of campaign-related influences.

In the event of a purported breach of the MCC, the ECI retains the authority to initiate remedial measures. This may entail issuing a notice to the concerned politician or party, either autonomously or in response to a complaint lodged by another entity. Subsequently, the accused individual or entity is afforded the opportunity to furnish a written response, wherein they may either admit fault and tender an unconditional apology or refute the allegations. Failure to satisfactorily address the charges may culminate in punitive actions, including a written censure or, in severe cases, prohibition from further campaigning.

For citizens keen on reporting instances of MCC violations, the ECI has established accessible channels for lodging complaints. Whether through direct communication with the Commission or via designated platforms, individuals are encouraged to vigilantly monitor electoral proceedings and promptly flag any transgressions they encounter.

To streamline the complaint filing process, the ECI has delineated several options, encompassing both digital and traditional modalities. Here’s a concise summary to guide you through the process:

Online Complaint Registration

1. National Grievance Services Portal: Accessible through the Election Commission of India’s official portal, this platform enables users to register complaints seamlessly. Following registration or login, individuals can furnish detailed complaints alongside any corroborating evidence.
– Register a Complaint Online:  Register Now
– Track Complaint Status: Track Now

2. Voter Helpline App: Available for Android and iOS devices, this intuitive app empowers users to file complaints directly from their mobile devices. Offering a unique ID for complaint tracking, it ensures the confidentiality of complainants.
– Android:  Download on Google Play
– iOS: Download on the App Store

3. cVIGIL App: Tailored for instantaneous reporting of MCC violations, cVIGIL allows users to submit evidence in the form of photos or videos (up to two minutes). With each submission generating a unique ID for tracking, transparency is paramount.
– Android: Download on Google Play
– iOS:Download on the App Store

-Web: Open Link Here

For those seeking additional information on the myriad election commission applications designed to enhance personalization and streamline communication, a dedicated webpage offers insights into their features and functionalities. From camera integration for capturing evidence to offline capabilities, these applications are geared towards facilitating seamless interaction between voters and election officials.
– Webpage:  Link

Offline Methods

1. Direct Reporting at Electoral Offices:
Individuals also have the option to lodge complaints in person at the office of the District Election Officer (DEO) or the Returning Officer (RO) within the relevant jurisdiction. Additionally, any violations observed at polling stations can be reported to the Booth Level Officer (BLO) or Election Observers designated by the Election Commission.

2. Contacting Chief Electoral Officers:
For concerns specific to a state or Union Territory (UT), reaching out to the Chief Electoral Officers (CEO) serves as a direct means to address issues with the highest authority.
– View List of CEOs

Should you choose to communicate through traditional mail, you can draft a letter addressed to the Chief Electoral Officer in Tamil Nadu. Here’s a template:

To,
Satyabrata Sahoo,
Chief Electoral Officer, Tamil Nadu,
Public (Elections) Department, Secretariat,
Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

Subject: [Violation of Model Code of Conduct – Please Provide Details]

Respected Sir/Madam,

1. I, [Your Full Name], Son/Daughter of [Father’s Name], aged [(●) years], a citizen of India residing at [Your Complete Address], solemnly affirm and declare as follows:

– Voter ID Number: [Insert Voter ID Number]
– Aadhar Number: [Insert Aadhar Number] (optional)

2. Details of the Incident: [Brief Description]
– Date of Incident: [Insert Date]
– Time of Incident: [Insert Time]
– Location of the Incident: [Insert Location, if available, provide a map link]

3. Description of the Incident:
Provide a comprehensive account of the observed violation(s) of the Model Code of Conduct, including pertinent details such as the sequence of events, individuals involved, and affiliated political parties. Specify any statements or actions that contravened the Model Code of Conduct. Common infractions may include, but are not limited to:
– Misuse of official authority to sway voters
– Bribery or coercion of voters
– Dissemination of false information regarding candidates or parties
– Utilization of government resources for campaign purposes
– Campaigning within the 48-hour period preceding polling
– Incitement of unrest or communal disharmony during campaigning
– Breach of campaign expenditure limits

4. Attached Evidence:
Please find enclosed with this affidavit any supporting evidence substantiating the aforementioned claims, such as photographic or video documentation, witness statements, or any other relevant materials. I affirm that the information provided herein is accurate and truthful to the best of my knowledge.

3. Toll-Free Helpline Number (24/7):
Citizens can reach out to the Voter Helpline by dialing 1950, irrespective of their location within the country. This toll-free service operates round-the-clock and facilitates inquiries or complaints in both English and Hindi. Callers can seek information regarding elections, voting dates, EPIC, electoral roll, online registration, or lodge complaints effortlessly.

With these accessible avenues at their disposal, Indian voters are empowered to play an active role in upholding the integrity of the electoral process. By promptly reporting instances of MCC violations, citizens reaffirm their commitment to a robust and democratic electoral framework.

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

VCK Head Thirumavalavan Who Called Temples ‘Obscene’ Visits Perumal Temple Ahead Of Polls

By
The Commune
-

VCK (Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi) chief Thirumavalavan, known for his staunch stance and controversial remarks against Hinduism and Hindu gods, took a surprising turn. Thirumavalavan, who is in alliance with the DMK (Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam), made a strategic visit to the Ariyalur Kallakurichi Kaliyuga Varadaraja Perumal Temple.

This unexpected visit comes as Thirumavalavan kickstarted his election campaign in Kallakurichi. Amidst the hustle and bustle of political campaigning, Thirumavalavan, accompanied by Minister for Transport S.S. Sivasankar, took a moment to seek blessings at the temple. Not only did he offer his respects, but he also partook in the sacred rituals, receiving prasad (religious offering) and even the sacred ash, thiruneeru, from a Brahmin priest.

The image of Thirumavalavan being blessed with thiruneeru by the Brahmin priest quickly went viral. This unexpected move by the VCK chief, known for his anti-Hindu stance, is seen as a calculated attempt to appeal to the Hindu electorate, especially in light of the alliance between VCK and the DMK.

It is to be noted that, VCK chief Thirumavalavan who made anti Hindu statements visited his ancestral temple – Mayavan temple in Anganur, Ariyalur before nomination. Welcomed by garlanding and headgear ritual, he submitted nomination papers to the officer in the presence of DMK Ministers Sivashankar and Panneerselvam.

He Called Temples Obscene

Some time ago, Thirumavalavan addressed a gathering, expressing opposition to educational policies based on Sanatana Dharma and humorously criticizes Hindu temples in front of the audience that, ““if the building has a dome, it is a mosque. If it is tall and straight, it is a church. And if it has dirty figurines, it is a temple”.

https://twitter.com/Muthuhere3/status/1772928107965448550

In 2017, Thirumavalavan said, “Destroy all hindu temples and in it place build Buddhist Viharas“. Addressing a gathering convened in Perambalur, VCK Chief Thirumavalavan, asserted that areas housing Shiva and Perumal temples were originally sites of Buddhist monasteries. He contended that these Buddhist structures were replaced by the construction of Shiva and Perumal temples, advocating for their demolition to pave the way for the erection of Buddhist temples in their stead. Furthermore, he proposed the establishment of Buddhist temples at the purported sites of Lord Thiruvaranganathar’s presence and the Kanji Kamachi Amman Temple.

In another occurrence during a webinar hosted by Periyarist groups, Thirumavalavan referred to women adhering to the Sanatana tradition as prostitutes. A particular excerpt from his speech circulating on social media highlights, “how are women valued in Sanatana Dharma, how are they treated? From time immemorial, how they have been oppressed and exploited… what does Sanatana Dharma say about women? Basically, women are created as prostitutes by God. All women are prostitutes as per Hindu Dharma…Manu Dharma… All women are prostitutes… that’s how they were created by God… they’re of a status lower than men. It applies to Brahmin women as well as to other women”.

He also took part in the September 2023 Eradicate Sanatana Dharma conference where Udhayanidhi Stalin had compared Sanatana Dharma to mosquito and dengue and said that it had to be eradicated. In the same conference, Thirumavalavan had said “Sanatana Dharma can be destroyed when we turn OBC against FC (Forward Caste).”

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Ground Reality Of The DMK: A Recap Of Instances Of Voter Discontent In TN Ahead Of Lok Sabha Elections

By
The Commune
-
xr:d:DAF7b5EtzKc:927,j:5546606621017102199,t:24040305

There seems to be a palpable amount of displeasure and dissatisfaction among the people with regard to the performance of the ruling DMK. This is very evident from the fact that the public is courageously questioning their MPs and MLAs as they are visiting the constituencies after a gap of 5 years.

In this report, we bring to you the various instances of such an open display of displeasure by the public in Tamil Nadu.

P Chidambaram

In the Karaikudi region, P Chidambaram who was canvassing for votes for his son Karthi Chidambaram contesting from the Sivagangai constituency, was confronted by women voters who expressed their dissatisfaction and raised pointed queries, including the persistence of a TASMAC shop despite fatalities and lack of job opportunities. Angered women demanded accountability, warning against seeking votes without addressing concerns. Karthi’s absence in the constituency added to discontent. Administrators intervened to calm tensions, and Chidambaram left midway. 

Sasikanth Senthil

Former IAS officer Sasikanth Senthil, now Congress candidate for Tiruvallur Lok Sabha Constituency, faced scrutiny during campaigning. A video captured DMK MLA VG Rajendran who was campaigning for Sasikatnth giving an aggressive response to a villager’s query about unfulfilled promises. Rajendran boasted about developmental projects, shifting blame to critics. He then diverted focus to the DMK’s initiatives, insinuating arrogance. DMK supporters subsequently intimidated the questioner.

MK Stalin

The DMK pledged a monthly allowance of ₹1,000 to all women in the state under the Magalir Urimai Thogai scheme, but currently, only 30% receive it. During an interaction with the public, a woman queried Chief Minister MK Stalin about the unfulfilled promise. However, Stalin dismissed her, claiming she was ineligible and was wrong to ask for the allowance. 

Udhayanidhi Stalin

During Udhayanidhi Stalin’s campaign in Madurantakam, tensions flared as women voters confronted him about shutting down TASMAC liquor stores, challenging DMK’s promises. Udhayanidhi reminded them of DMK’s pledge to close TASMAC outlets in 2016 but blamed the people for voting for ADMK and thus deflecting blame onto the previous ADMK government for not doing anything. The women demanded the closure of all TASMAC shops, but Udhayanidhi avoided making any commitments, opting for evasion tactics. 

Kathir Anand

During a campaign event in Vellore, Kathir Anand commented on the appearance of women, suggesting that their faces were shining due to the use of fairness cream and powder. He questioned whether they had already received ₹1,000, seemingly referring to the state’s scheme providing financial assistance to women homemakers. Anand’s remarks have sparked controversy and criticism. When this video was shown to women across the state, they said they felt insulted, the comments were derogatory, and that most of them had not even received the money for him to make those comments.

Dayanidhi Maran

Chennai Central’s Dayanidhi Maran, aiming for re-election, encountered resident backlash for undelivered commitments, notably housing projects. During a procession, Maran faced resident anger, with one woman rebuking him, highlighting politicians’ vote-seeking nature. Maran’s retort, calling the woman a fool, further escalated tensions. Despite attempts to justify delays, constituents remain dissatisfied, reflecting broader discontent towards DMK’s performance. 

Periyasamy

In Dindigul, the visibly angry public warned DMK MLA I Periyasamy who also functions as the Minister of Rural Development, Panchayats and Panchayat Union from entering their village and sent him back. He went there to campaign for INDI alliance member Communist party candidate Sachidanandam. However, the people chased him away stating there was no water or jobs in the village and he didn’t have to come there seeking votes. 

Anita Radhakrishnan

Campaigning for Thirunelveli Congress candidate Robert Bruce, DMK Minister of Animal Husbandry of Tamil Nadu, Anita R Radhakrishnan faced backlash from the public, especially women at Mukkudal. The women demanded why they were not given the promised ₹1,000. To this, Radhakrishnan replied saying that the needful will be done after the elections. However, the women chased him out stating that they were not going to vote this time, and warned him not to make an appearance again seeking votes. 

DMK Candidate Prakash & DMK Minister Kayalvizhi

Ahead of the Lok Sabha elections in Tamil Nadu, DMK’s Prakash contests from Erode constituency amidst farmer protests demanding water release from Thirumurthy to Upparu Dam. Despite appeals for negotiations, no action has been taken, prompting farmers to display black flags in protest. Adi Dravidar Welfare Minister Kayalvizhi’s campaign visit to Kundadam Therpadhai faced tensions as locals, frustrated by the water crisis, urged politicians not to seek votes without addressing concerns. Kayalvizhi stayed inside her vehicle amid protests, while Prakash hastily concluded the campaign amidst the tense atmosphere.

Tamizhachi Thangapandian

In South Chennai’s parliamentary constituency, during incumbent DMK MP Tamizhachi Thangapandian‘s campaign, residents in Mylapore erupted in discontent, accusing her of neglecting critical issues like damaged housing boards despite assurances. They questioned her commitment beyond elections, emphasizing the urgency of repairs and highlighting concerns about clean water access. Thangapandian affirmed her dedication but faced skepticism. She was turned away by the residents.

Kalanidhi Veerasamy

DMK candidate Kalanidhi Veerasamy kicked off his campaign in Tiruvottiyur for the North Chennai Lok Sabha seat, followed by a voter outreach program at the Urban Habitat Development Board residence in Kolathur constituency. However, tensions flared as women residents, feeling neglected during the December floods, questioned the party’s intentions. They lamented their exclusion from relief efforts despite residing in the affected flats and expressed frustration at being approached for votes afterward.

Jothimani

Congress MP Jyotimani, contesting for reelection in Tamil Nadu’s Karur constituency under the DMK alliance, faced tough questions from constituents during campaigning. A resident expressed skepticism over her sudden appearance, questioning her absence in the past five years. Jyotimani defended her record, emphasizing her parliamentary participation.

Thanga Tamil Selvan

Campaigning for the Theni Lok Sabha seat, Thanga Tamil Selvan faced scrutiny over long-standing road issues in Alagarsamipuram village. His response, attributing lack of engagement to fatigue, disappointed residents. Subsequent altercations between DMK officials and the questioning youth highlight the disconnect between politicians and constituents.

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“If Anyone Comes Asking For Votes, We Will Hit Them With Stones”, Women In Karaikudi Protest Campaign By Congress Leader Chidambaram

By
The Commune
-

During this Lok Sabha 2024 season, it’s heartening to witness the electorate’s heightened awareness and courage as they question politicians seeking votes. This reflects a robust mindset, with voters inclined to choose promising candidates over those who previously failed to deliver. There’s a noticeable shift towards evaluating candidates based on their election agendas rather than mere symbolic affiliations.

The aforementioned assertion holds true as it was evidenced by the strong protest and questioning directed at former Union Minister P Chidambaram when he campaigned for his son, Karti Chidambaram, a Congress candidate and the current Member of Parliament representing Sivaganga. This incident occurred notably in the Karaikudi region, where female voters expressed their dissatisfaction and raised pointed queries, leading to Chidambaram’s prompt departure from the campaign trail.

During P Chidambaram’s campaign visit to Mithravayal village near Karaikudi on 1 April 2024, a disgruntled woman voiced her protest, expressing frustration that Karthi Chidambaram hadn’t visited the constituency in the past five years and implying that P Chidambaram shouldn’t canvass either.

Responding from atop a jeep, P Chidambaram asserted his right to speak,  “I have the right to speak. You also have the right to speak. First I will speak. Then you speak.”

Despite this, when the woman persisted in speaking out, P Chidambaram suggested that she be given a platform within a political party in the upcoming election. The tense exchange took place against the backdrop of a tragedy in the village, where three people had recently died from consuming alcohol. Further highlighted this tragedy, criticizing the lack of response, “You can’t remove TASMAC shops, three people from the same house have died of drinking. A lot of people get drunk and don’t go to work, my son didn’t get a job. Please answer our questions properly, Karthi has not come to the constituency till now. What did you do for the constituency? The hospital facility that existed 40 years ago does not exist anymore. Not even a hospital is here. From now on, no one should come here asking for votes. We won’t vote for Congress. If anyone comes, we will hit them with stones.”

The video capturing the woman’s impassioned speech during P. Chidambaram’s campaign event quickly circulated on social media, sparking widespread discussion and debate.

(with inputs from Dinamalar)

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“Don’t Come! Don’t Come To Our Town Asking For Votes!” – People Of Dharapuram Show Black Flags Protesting Against DMK MP Candidate

By
The Commune
-

Polling for the Lok Sabha elections in Tamil Nadu is set to take place in a single phase on the 19th of the month. Among the candidates vying for seats, Prakash is contesting from the Erode Lok Sabha constituency under the DMK banner. The constituency encompasses Kumarapalayam, Erode East, Erode West, Modakurichi, Dharapuram (Separate), and Kangeyam constituencies. However, leading up to the elections, farmers in the region have been engaged in various protests, demanding the release of water from the Thirumurthy Dam to the Upparu Dam.

Despite multiple requests for negotiations with Tirupur district administration chief Kristuraj, who oversees the region, the farmers claim no action has been taken. Consequently, they have resorted to displaying black flags on houses, gardens, and commercial establishments in over 10 villages, including Therpadhai, Panamarathu Palayam, and Nanjiampalayam, to emphasize their demand for water release. They also raised slogans like, “Don’t come! Don’t come! Don’t come to our town asking for votes!”

In light of the ongoing water crisis, Adi Dravidar Welfare Minister Kayalvizhi visited the Kundadam Therpadhai area within the Dharapuram constituency to campaign in support of DMK candidate Prakash. However, tensions escalated when locals, frustrated by the lack of action on water release, displayed banners urging politicians not to seek votes without addressing their concerns.

A tense atmosphere prevailed as the public protested, raising black flags and slogans, leading to a confrontation with law enforcement. Minister Kayalvizhi, arriving to campaign for Prakash, remained inside her vehicle and eventually left without disembarking. Prakash, addressing the public briefly, hastily concluded the campaign amid the tense situation. 

This follows the pattern of the public openly showing their emotions over their increasing dissatisfaction with the ruling DMK. In the past week, several such incidents occurred in Chennai:

  • South Chennai DMK MP Tamizhachi Thangapandian was turned away by the residents of Mylapore over unfulfilled promises and her long absence. 
  • Central Chennai DMK MP Dayanidhi Maran faced hard questions from his constituents over unfulfilled promises.
  • North Chennai DMK MP Kalanidhi Veerasamy also faced similar treatment by the public especially over his absence after the devastating floods following Cyclone Michaung.
  • DMK MLA VG Rajendran, an assembly member, who was campaigning for Congress candidate Sasikanth Senthil in Tiruvallur faced a barrage of questions and opposition from the people. 
  • DMK candidate Thanga Tamil Selvan‘s campaign in Theni was interrupted by a youth to voice concerns about the lack of road facilities in his area for over two decades. 
  • Karur Congress MP Jothimani also faced tough questions from constituents during her campaign in Kodankipatti Adi Dravidar residential area.

(with inputs from Kumudam)

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“You Go Canvass For Your Wife”: DMK MP Dayanidhi Maran Tells PMK Leader Dr. Anbumani Ramadoss

By
The Commune
-

The election fervor has spread across Tamil Nadu with just 16 days remaining for the Lok Sabha elections in 2024. Despite the BJP finalizing its alliance quietly as the last one, it is strategically steering the momentum in its favor by staying in the spotlight. Recently, discussions in Tamil Nadu have centered around Katchatheevu, a small island ceded by India to neighboring Sri Lanka. The Tamil Nadu BJP President’s acquisition of RTI information has brought to light the reality of how the tiny island was handed over to Sri Lanka by the Congress-DMK alliance, breaking the narrative that had been upheld for 50 years.

This exposure of their conspiracy has dealt a significant blow to them, as incumbent MPs and MLAs are already facing intense scrutiny from the public regarding their unfulfilled promises wherever they go. On 1 April 2024, Dayanidhi Maran, the current MP representing the DMK in the Central Chennai constituency, campaigned for re-election in the same constituency campaigned in Kodambakkam, Nungambakkam, and surrounding areas. His daughter, Divya Dayanidhi Maran, accompanied him in his efforts to secure votes for his candidacy.

The journalists seeking to interrogate Dayanidhi Maran regarding the revelation from the Annamalai RTI documents about the transfer of the Kachchatheevu island to Sri Lanka, and asked about the involvement of the DMK in the matter. Dayanidhi stuttered to reply, “DMK didn’t do it, the truth is that Congress did it without asking Kalaignar and MK Stalin has clearly spoken about this many times.” Soon after, he diverted the direction of his response, sidestepping the question of whether the accusations regarding the RTI were valid. Instead, he shifted focus to Prime Minister Modi’s affinity for the Tamil language post-elections. He queried whether, during Modi’s ten-year tenure, he remained oblivious to crucial matters such as the Kachchatheevu issue.

Then the DMK MP Dayanidhi Maran, pointed fingers at Edappadi Palaniswami, insinuating that he too didn’t take any actions in their term but the issue is rising now suggesting politically motivated due to upcoming elections. When Dayanidhi was pressed by reporters about External Affairs Minister Jaishankar’s statement regarding the consultation with the former chief minister of Tamilnadu (Karunanidhi) on the Katchatheevu island issue, Maran quickly refuted it, accusing the government replied, “NO this is wrong, As soon as the election comes, they immediately telling lies“. Then again Dayanidhi resorted to the same tactic instead of directly addressing the question, diverted attention to the delayed response to an RTI query on PM Cares Fund, and falsely claimed that the Ministry was withholding information about the PM Cares Fund.

Dayanidhi Maran was already frustrated by the persistent inquiries from journalists when they revisited the critique voiced by MP Anbumani Ramadoss, who remarked, “As soon as December comes, the people of Chennai are afraid, as the houses are surrounded by floods.” Dayanidhi Maran responded, “Just one request to Anbumani Ramadoss, we suffered in floods, did you come? Your house is in Chennai right, you may have come and seen all this flood right, Ramadoss, who did not come then, why is he talking now during the elections.” Infuriated Dayanidhi said, “You go and ask for votes for your wife“

Dayanidhi Maran has a history of criticizing individuals on a personal level. Previously, he has made similar comments when angered. For instance, he has disparaged Hindi speakers, suggesting they are only suitable for menial jobs such as construction work and toilet cleaning. In another instance, he made casteist remarks by expressing a sense of entitlement akin to a ruling class, stating, “They treated us like third-class people. What are we? Depressed class people?” Additionally, he also made derogatory comments about the profession of barbers.

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Annamalai Exposes DMK & Congress Nexus On Kachchatheevu Issue

By
The Commune
-

In the ongoing 2024 Lok Sabha elections campaign in Tamil Nadu, the small island of Kachchatheevu has become a focal point of discussion. Recent disclosures stemming from a Right to Information (RTI) request, brought to light by Tamil Nadu BJP president K Annamalai, have sparked significant controversy. These revelations shed light on how the Congress government under Indira Gandhi acquiesced to Sri Lanka’s territorial claims, triggering a heated debate and unveiling a host of issues.

Once again on 1 April 2024, Annamalai released part 2 of the expose of the cede of Kachchatheevu island to Sri Lanka with the official documents and parliamentary records of ‘minutes of the meeting‘. Subsequently, Annamalai conducted a press briefing to elucidate the events surrounding the matter.

Annamalai releasing the copy of minutes of the meeting through his official X account stated, “Excerpt of the Betrayal of Kalaignar Karunanidhi in the ceding of the Kachchatheevu island to Sri Lanka. This is just one of the many double standards of DMK. Some were exposed immediately, but this one took 50 years.”

Minutes of the meeting read, “Foreign secretary, Kewal Singh, accompanied by Director Historical Division BK Basu called on the chief minister of Tamilnadu M Karunanidhi at the secretariat conference room Fort Saint George, Madras on 19 June 1974 at 11:00 a.m. At the meeting which lasted for more than an hour, the chief Minister was assisted by the Tamil Nadu chief secretary P Sabanayagam, and later also by the Home Secretary SP Ambrose.

After the exchange of courtesies, Foreign Secretary explained the purpose of his visit. Recalling the talks he had in New Delhi with the chief minister on 13 October 1973 and with their chief secretary and other officials of Tamil Nadu Government in Madras on 14 October 1973 before the Indo-Sri Lanka official level talks in Colombo 15 to 16 October 1973, Foreign Secretary said that the purpose was to keep the Tamil Nadu government fully informed of the development in the talks with this Sri Lanka and get the benefit of the views and suggestions of Tamil Nadu authorities. 

Foreign Secretary then gave a resume of the talks held in Colombo in October 1973 which consisted mainly of a free, frank, and full exchange of the views by both sides on the issue of sovereignty over Kachchativu. At these talks, the Indian side presented as strong a case as possible on the basis of evidence collected at various record offices in London, The Hague, Goa, and Tamil Nadu (Madras and Ramanathapuram). The Indian case rested mainly on the claim of Raja of Ramnad that the island of Kachchativu belonged to him from time immemorial and formed part of the Zamindari as granted to him by the East India Company in 1803. It is especially in that capacity that he exercised the rights not only over Kachchativu but also in relation to fishery and other resources in the area adjoining the island. The Raja exercised these rights continuously and uninterruptedly from 1805 to 1948 as is evidenced in the various leases executed for the fishing”. 

“At this stage the Chief secretary wanted to know whether a line could not be agreed upon which passed through Kachchativu. Foreign Secretary mentioned that various suggestions had been mooted by the Indian side: i) Condominium, ii) a line cutting through the island, and , iii)a line skirting the island, none of which was acceptable to Sri Lanka. At one stage, the Chief Secretary also suggested that the strong feelings prevalent in Tamil Nadu could help strengthen the Central Government’s bargaining posture. Foreign Secretary said that this had not been lost sight of but it apparently had no effect on Sri Lanka side. In this connection the Chief Minister wanted to know whether any mass hysteria has been built up in Sri Lanka over Kachchativu. Foreign Secretary said that the controlled press in Sri Lanka, unlike that of India, could whip up public feeling on the subject and make a solution difficult to attain.”

“On the substance of the proposal, the Chief Minister indicated that he was inclined to accept the suggested solution. His difficulty was, however, that he could not take the opposition into confidence without sharing with them the knowledge about the oil strike and convince them about the need to accept the compromise. He wanted to know whether the Prime Minister has sounded the opposition. Foreign Secretary said that to his knowledge, the proposal was only known to one or two senior Cabinet Ministers and that probably Prime Minister would like to have the views of the Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu before discussing it over the opposition leaders,” the statement further read.

Subsequently, during a press briefing discussing the revelation regarding the conflicting stances of Congress and DMK on the Kachchatheevu issue, Annamalai asserted that, “This morning our External Affairs minister Jaishankar explained in detail about the Kachchatheevu issue in Delhi. In continuation, BJP has a few questions to put forward to the DMK government. The DMK and its leaders lied that the island was ceded to Sri Lanka without the knowledge of the DMK and enacted a drama of protest in the parliament. Particularly, former DMK MP Sezhiyan said in the parliament that the centre did not discuss the Kachchatheevu ceding with Karunanidhi. The DMK MPs made a ruckus in the parliament against the Congress and did not allow the then Home Minister Swaran Singh to speak. Today, if you look at the documents accessed through RTI on the issue, it is seen that the former External Affairs Ministry secretary Kewal Singh, accompanied by Director of Historical Division BK Basu met Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Karunanidhi on 19 June 1974, the meeting was held for an hour and the minutes of the meeting of the same were documented and kept as a classified file. Today it is clear that the External Affairs Ministry Secretary met Karunanidhi a month before the ceding of the Kachchatheevu and got his consent. Most importantly we got to know that Karunanidhi in 1974 asked the central government to postpone the ceding for two years. It is clear that Karunanidhi’s full consent was accorded before giving away the island to Sri Lanka. During that meeting, they discussed demarcating the island by dividing it into equal parts as well, not only did Karunanidhi accepted the centre’s decision to cede the island, he assured to play down the issue with small protest and take care of the political repercussions.”

Annamalai accused the Congress and DMK conspired jointly to surrender the Kachchatheevu island to Sri Lanka, with full backing from the DMK. Presently, the DMK is vigorously lobbying the External Affairs Minister with 21 letters seeking the return of Kachchatheevu island. Annamalai emphasized that if the former Chief Minister Karunanidhi had opposed the surrender, the central government would not have had grounds to proceed with it.

Earlier, on 31 March 2024, Tamil Nadu BJP chief Annamalai, unveiled the Part 1 of the revelation via his official X account stated  “This is the first part of the chronology of the betrayal of Congress & DMK. Both these parties chose to align with Sri Lankan interests, handed over Katchatheevu on a silver platter & put to risk the lives & livelihood of our Tamil Fishermen. This is part 1 of the exposè published by @TOIIndiaNews today based on an RTI. DMK’s two-timing will be exposed in part 2 of this exposè. DMK & Congress are answerable for the loss of innumerable lives of our Tamil Fishermen.”

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Police Register Case After ABVP Protests Over Disrespectful Depiction Of Ma Sita In A Play At Pondicherry University

By
The Commune
-

In a recent incident that has stirred significant debate, Pondicherry University found itself embroiled in a contentious issue surrounding a play presented during its annual cultural festival, Ezhini 2K24. The Department of Performing Arts staged a production titled “SOMAYANAM” on 29 March 2024, which has ignited a firestorm of criticism. Allegations have surfaced regarding the play’s portrayal of characters from the revered Hindu epic, Ramayana, which many have found deeply disrespectful and offensive.

According to reports from ABVP (Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad), a prominent student organization, the play purportedly depicted Sita, a central figure in the Ramayana, offering beef to Ravana, the antagonist in the epic, among other objectionable scenes. Furthermore, the character of Hanuman, a revered devotee of Lord Rama, was allegedly subjected to mockery, with his distinctive tail portrayed as an antenna used for communication. These portrayals have evoked strong condemnation from various quarters, particularly Hindu communities who hold the Ramayana in the highest regard.

In response to the perceived affront to Hindu sentiments, ABVP staged protests at Pondicherry University on 30 March 2024, demanding accountability from the university administration. The student organization issued a statement on 31 March 2024 vehemently condemning the play’s content and calling for swift action against those responsible for its production.

Moreover, ABVP has accused Communist and Left-led outfits on the university campus of orchestrating the controversial play as part of a deliberate agenda to malign Hindu deities and question the sanctity of revered religious texts. They have demanded disciplinary measures against individuals involved in the play’s creation and production, including the writer, director, and actors.

The controversy at Pondicherry University is not an isolated incident. Similar instances of alleged disrespect towards Hindu religious figures have been reported from Pune University, where a play titled “Jab We Met” staged objectionable scenes, including Sita smoking a cigarette. These incidents have reignited debates on the boundaries of creative expression, religious sensitivity, and the responsibilities of academic institutions in upholding cultural and religious values.

In response to public outcry and widespread dissemination of footage depicting the controversial scenes, Puducherry police have initiated legal action, indicating a growing recognition of the seriousness of the matter. 

Kalapet Police in Pondicherry University registered a case against students and others for outraging religious feelings in the play  “Somayanam” at the festival. Police initiated an inquiry, and the university formed a committee to investigate. 

Meanwhile, university administrations have formed committees to investigate the incidents further and address concerns raised by various stakeholders.

(with inputs from Organiser)

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Kerala : Banned Org PFI’s Political Unit SDPI Announces Support For Congress-Led UDF For 2024 Polls

By
The Commune
-

On 1st April 2024, the Social Democratic Party of India (SDPI), affiliated with the banned Popular Front of India (PFI), announced its endorsement of the Congress-led United Democratic Front (UDF) for the upcoming 2024 Lok Sabha elections in Kerala.

Ashraf Moulavi, the state president of SDPI Kerala, declared that they have opted not to field any candidates in Kerala. Nevertheless, nationally, 18 SDPI candidates are participating in the elections. This decision aligns with the Congress-led I.N.D.I alliance at the national level. Moulavi clarified that the party’s Kerala unit has not yet determined whether to actively campaign for UDF candidates or formalize any agreement with the UDF.

In the 2014 Lok Sabha elections, SDPI contested in all 20 Kerala constituencies, garnering votes ranging from 3,513 in Kottayam to 47,853 in Malappuram. However, in 2019, they contested only 10 constituencies. Moulavi highlighted a growth in both the number of branches and votes over the past decade, which he believes will bolster the alliance. He emphasized that the Congress party’s stance on issues such as implementing a caste census and defending constitutional values and secularism against challenges during BJP rule influenced their decision.

MM Hassan, the interim president of the Kerala Pradesh Congress Committee (KPCC), responded to SDPI’s support for the UDF by stating that he lacks prior knowledge of the move and that the party will need to deliberate on it. He stressed the importance of internal discussions before accepting support from any party.

Moulavi further clarified that neither the Congress nor the UDF in Kerala has formally reached out to SDPI. However, candidates from various parties have approached them. He reiterated that the party’s primary focus is on its growth, and decisions are being made with that objective in mind.

(with inputs from TNIE)

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Tiruvallur Constituents Confront DMK While Campaigning For Congress MP Candidate Sasikanth Senthil

By
The Commune
-

In this election cycle 2024, there appears to be notable discontent among Tamil Nadu voters towards the incumbent DMK government led by Chief Minister MK Stalin. Despite being the first party to seal alliances and commence campaigning, DMK’s star campaigners and candidates are facing intense scrutiny and tough questioning from constituents wherever they visit.

On 31 March 2024, former IAS officer Sasikanth Senthil currently the Congress candidate for the Tiruvallur Lok Sabha Constituency was involved in canvassing for votes, accompanied by his allies and supporters. Tiruvallur West District Secretary Tiruthani Chandran and Thiruvallur Legislative Assembly member VG Rajendran participated in the gathering. A video circulating widely on social media captured a moment where VG Rajendran, the assembly member, was seen forcefully advocating for Sasikanth Senthil, using a threatening tone and speaking disrespectfully in response to a query raised by a member of the audience towards the DMK MLA.

The altercation took place in Ulundhai village, the location of Chief Minister Stalin’s farmhouse. When MLA VG Rajendran began to address the crowd, they angrily questioned his actions as an elected representative. They demanded to know why he was seeking votes without delivering any tangible results since the previous assembly election.

DMK MLA VG Rajendran swiftly responded to the individual who raised concerns, with immediate anger, “Hey, come here and ask, why are you speaking from there, come here! Come up I’ll answer to you. This kind of work… hey! What do you know? are you cheating people? Who got this job worth ₹7 crore done, we did it! I, the MLA recommended MK Stalin to put a road here, the tank was also built by me MLA, no one but me”

Later VG Rajendran stated that those who seek to discredit his efforts and create issues would express themselves in such a manner. He then swiftly transitioned, in line with the typical stance of the DMK, to questioning the implementation of the Magalir Urimai Thogai (women’s basic income scheme), insinuating whether MK Stalin was giving or someone else. He emphasized that it was only after the DMK came to power that amenities such as street lights, roads, and tanks were installed in Ulundhai village, delivering his remarks with a tone reflecting the perceived arrogance of DMK.

 Afterward, supporters of the DMK intimidated and encircled the individual who dared to raise concerns about the MLA.

 

 Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

1...1,0361,0371,038...1,969Page 1,037 of 1,969
TheCommune
The Commune is a news and views portal focusing on social and political issues of the southern part of India with a focus on Tamil Nadu.
Contact us: thecommune.news@gmail.com
Facebook Instagram X Youtube

NATIONAL NEWS

Highly Evolved Dravidian Model State TN Said No To 8 Lane Expressway, Andhra Is Building A New Greenfield Highway

Highly Evolved Dravidian Model State TN Said No To 8 Lane...

The Commune - 0
Andhra Pradesh is set to get a massive new greenfield highway connecting it directly to eastern India, with Chief Minister N Chandrababu Naidu announcing...
© The Commune 2025. All Rights Reserved.