Home Blog Page 990

“Not Pleased By Jai Shri Ram Kolams On Jan 22”: TN Cong Leader Posts Video Of Husband’s Rant On Ram Mandir Celebrations

Tamil Nadu Congress General Secretary Lakshmi Ramachandran today drew sharp criticism online after posting a video of her husband criticising his neighbours for celebrating the Pran-Prathishtha ceremony in Ayodhya.

Interestingly, she disclosed the person’s identity only when specifically asked by a netizen. Superficially, the video gives the impression that a common man gave the speech without any political agenda.

In the 4:47-minute video, Ramachandran’s husband, Swaminathan, addresses community members during a Republic Day celebration. He tells the Hindus who celebrated the Pran-Prathishtha of Lord Ram in Ayodhya’s temple on January 22, stating that they “really irked” and “bothered” him.

“There has to be something that stops us from celebrating divisive things, such as what happened on Jan 22,” Swaminathan says in the video. “I saw calls of Jai Sri Ram on Kolam designs that day. And I was not pleased.”

 

He also tells the Hindu residents not to pass on their “wrong values” to their children. “That’s why I am talking to children mainly. We want to look at the future and I hope our children do not take the wrong lessons from what we do. Even though we might do it to the best of intentions. I am not questioning intentions here. But there has to be something that stops us from celebrating divisive things, that is, such as what happened on Jan 22.”

While he asserts he has no issue celebrating festivals like Diwali, Eid, and Christmas, Swaminathan argues that “we should really think twice before celebrating something like that (Pran-Prathishtha)”. He claims to be speaking on behalf of “Muslim friends in the community, as well as a few minorities who are not happy with that event.”

Ramachandran shared the video on her social media with the caption, “A speech delivered in our residential community’s Republic Day celebrations! Long live Secular Indian Republic!”. The primary tweet does not mention her relationship with the speaker. An impressionable reader may be misled to believe that this speech reflects the opinions and sentiments of society.

When a netizen flatteringly asked Ramachandran, “Wow…who is he ? TV actor ?”, she introduced Swaminathan as “Tamil Medai nadaga nadigar” (meaning “actor on the Tamil stage”) and her husband of 20 years.

Swaminathan also justifies his stance by referencing his acting career and familiarity with religious texts. He says he played the roles of Manikavasagar, Ramanujan, and Aurangazeb on stage. He also talks about his knowledge of holy texts, claiming to know verses from the Quran, Thiruvasagam, and Diva Pramandam.

“There is beauty in celebrating events together,” Swaminathan says. “But not that event because many of the children may not know this. But some of us who were there in 1992 know very well how this all started. In what kind of divisive way this started. Some of you might want me to go back 400 years. Well, I don’t want to look at history like that.”

The video has sparked widespread condemnation online, with many criticising Swaminathan’s remarks as insensitive and divisive.

This video drew hundreds of comments in criticism. Some of them are as follows:

https://twitter.com/Bharath12450842/status/1750939593694978327

https://twitter.com/Bharath12450842/status/1750939593694978327?s=20

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Kerala Governor Stages Sudden Wayside Sit-in Protest Seeking Arrest Of SFI Members

Kerala Guv resists SFI attacks
Kerala Guv staged a sudden roadside sit-in protest against SFI activists.

Kerala Governor Arif Mohammed Khan took an unusual step to express his displeasure with the Students’ Federation of India (SFI) activists who allegedly attacked his car during a protest against him. Khan boldly got out of his vehicle and sat in front of a wayside shop on the busy MC Road, demanding the arrest of the activists that he claimed were being protected by the police.

The Governor left the roadside tea shop after an hour when the police registered a case against the protesters affiliated with the ruling CPI(M) party. The SFI members were staging a black-flag protest against Khan, who was on way to attend a function at an Aashram near Kottarakkara.

“I am not upset about the black flag protest. But I was worried when they hit my vehicle,” he reportedly said.

Khan confronted the SFI activists and subsequently took a chair from a nearby shop and sat down, refusing to move until the agitators were arrested.

“I will not leave from here. Police are giving them protection,” Khan is seen angrily telling onlookers.

https://twitter.com/MahaRathii/status/1751140680544505894?s=20

The standoff continued for some time, with a large crowd gathering at the spot, including police officials and local residents.

“If the police are the ones breaking the law, who is going to uphold the law,” he asked the policemen.

This latest incident is a fresh addition to the ongoing tussle between Khan and the Left government in the state, which has been marked by disagreements over various issues, particularly the functioning of universities in the state and Khan’s refusal to sign specific bills passed by the assembly. 

The tension peaked earlier this week when Khan abruptly ended his customary policy address to the Kerala Assembly after just two minutes amidst protests from the ruling party MLAs.

The SFI has been at the forefront of protests against Khan, accusing him of using his authority as Chancellor of universities in the state to appoint nominees of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) to key positions in universities.

Khan has denied these allegations.

(Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.)

“Congress Not Running For People But To Get Seats From Us, They Don’t Work Or Do Good For People”: I.N.D.I. Ally DMK Min Rajakannappan On Congress

In a recent general meeting organised by the Puducherry DMK Student’s Wing on the occasion of Anti-Hindi Imposition Day to honour the martyrs, Tamil Nadu Higher Education and Backward Welfare Minister Raja Kannappan passionately expressed support for DMK Chief Minister M.K. Stalin, labelling him as the number one Chief Minister in India. The minister urged students to rally behind Stalin to ‘uphold and safeguard’ the Dravidian movement.

Kannappan emphasised the desire to extend the Dravidian model of governance practiced in Tamil Nadu to Puducherry. Taking a swipe at Puducherry Chief Minister Rangasamy, Kannappan accused the local government of lacking principles and theories, asserting that the Chief Minister tends to make promises without fulfilling them. He questioned the credentials of opposition leader Annamalai to criticise M.K. Stalin’s administration, asserting that no opposition forces could undermine the achievements of the Tamil Nadu Chief Minister.

Speaking on the political landscape, Kannappan asserted that the ‘lotus’, (symbolising the BJP), will not bloom in Tamil Nadu and Puducherry, reiterating the call for DMK governance in Puducherry. While acknowledging the presence of Congress as an ally, Kannappan urged the party to work harder and be more people-centric, criticising the tendency of Congress to engage actively only during elections. In a video clipping of the event that went viral, he is seen saying, “Congress runs the party only to snatch seats. What is the use of that? They are not running a party for toiling and working for the benefit of the people, but they come at the time of elections, peep, this doesn’t work with the people. That is why the BJP is doing all this show, they cannot do that with us. We will beat them up if they come to TN. They cannot play here, we (DMK) will take care of the BJP.”

This statement led to speculation that all is not well with the I.N.D.I.Alliance especially since Bihar Chief Minister and their ally Nitish Kumar has dropped massive hints at quitting the alliance and raising doubts about him joining the NDA. 

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“My Father Not A Sanghi, Only A Person With Humanity Would Do Lal Salaam”: Aishwarya Rajinikanth Stokes Controversy

The audio launch event for Aishwarya Rajinikanth’s third directorial venture, “Lal Salaam,” took place on 26 January 2024, at Sri Sairam Institute of Technology in Chennai. The film stars Vikranth and Vishnu Vishal in lead roles, and actor Rajinikanth makes an extended cameo as Moideen Bhai. The musical score is by AR Rahman, and Lyca Productions is producing the film, which is scheduled for theatrical release on 9 February 2024.

During the event, Aishwarya Rajinikanth addressed the personal attacks her father, Rajinikanth, faced on social media. She clarified, “People label my father as a sanghi. I want to assert here that Rajinikanth is not a sanghi. If he were, he wouldn’t have been a part of “Lal Salaam”. Rajinikanth became emotional and teary-eyed upon hearing these words.

AR Rahman, when speaking, said , “Rajinikanth transcends religious boundaries”.

Regarding “Lal Salaam”, Rajinikanth shared, “My character, Moideen Bhai, is inspired by a real person from a southern district, and the film depicts an incident from 1992. To protect his identity from opportunists, it remains undisclosed”. The actor then discussed religious harmony and the fundamental principles of Hinduism.

Calling Out The Hypocrisy Of Rajinikanth

Our special article in The Commune penned on why Rajini is perceived as an opportunist rather than a ‘Sanghi’, citing instances where he has, on multiple occasions, portrayed animosity against Hindus in his movies.

Particularly Rajinikanth in ‘Lal Salaam’ takes on the role of Moideen Bhai, portraying the character of a virtuous Muslim, while another antagonist, Adithya Menon is depicted with a distinctive red tilak. In a pivotal scene, Moideen Bhai, observing the presence of Senthil clad in a saffron shawl, remarks, “What have you guys done! You’ve blended politics with religion! You’ve injected venom into the innocent children playing!”

The question arises whether there will be a scene featuring Muslim players engaging in namaz on the field, similar to Pakistani players. The answer remains uncertain, but considering that the film is being released by Udhayanidhi Stalin’s Red Giants, it is reasonable to assume the outcome.

While it’s acknowledged that not every actor can control the script of their film, Rajinikanth, being a highly popular figure, holds significant influence. Fans take his messages seriously, and he has the power to select scripts or shape them to convey his desired messages. Despite this, he chose to participate in projects like “Kaala,” demonizing Ram Bhakts, “Petta,” attempting to portray Bajrang Dal negatively, and “Lal Salaam,” collaborating with another leftist-Dravidianist propagandist. Giving him the benefit of the doubt would be akin to self-deception. Despite Rajinikanth’s outwardly spiritual and god-fearing persona, one must not isolate his real-life beliefs from his reel-life portrayals.

Netizens reacted on social media regarding whether he is can be called a “Sanghi” or if he is an opportunist.

Another netizen posted a video of Rajinikanth’s visit to the residence of Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath in Lucknow on August 2023. In the video, Rajinikanth respectfully bowed and touched Yogi Adityanath’s feet, but this gesture sparked criticism and ridicule.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“If Nakkheeran Gopal Had As Much Brains As His Moustache His Magazine Would Sell, N. Ram Campaigned Against BJP In Harbour”: Annamalai Slams DMK Propagandists Masquerading As Journalists

Journalists and representatives from various journalist associations expressed their dissent over Tamil Nadu BJP president K Annamalai’s alleged derogatory remarks towards them. The protest, which took place at Valluvar Kottam in Chennai on 25 January 2024, was prompted by Annamalai’s comments directed at senior television journalist Karthigaichelvan of News 18 Tamil.

Annamalai expressed his view that Udhayanidhi wasn’t subjected to challenging questions during an interaction, likening it to a friendly match. However, his choice of a colloquial Tamil term to convey this opinion was perceived as derogatory by certain journalists. Despite the controversy, Annamalai declined to offer an apology for his use of language.

TN BJP chief Annamalai responded to the protest staged by journalists against him. He stated, “N.Ram associated with The Hindu, actively campaigned against the BJP candidate Vinoj Selvam in the Harbour constituency, going to the extent of distributing pamphlets. Today he is speaking as if he is a centrist.”

He added,“The predicament in Tamil Nadu lies in the fact that individuals like you toil tirelessly under the scorching sun, earning meagre amounts like ₹10,000 or ₹15,000 through their hard work. Wherever we are, you gather news diligently. So, if you people criticise us, we will accept it, you are fully eligible, you have the right to do it, but it becomes problematic when journalists, relying solely on the ruling party, criticise us without contributing anything themselves. 14 people are talking there on the stage, 10 people (the media house’s camerapersons) listening to it – 30 people are putting up a protest. Nakkheeran Gopal’s statement is wrong, and I am not going to provide an explanation to address that. If Nakkheeran Gopal had brains equivalent to that of his moustache, the progress of Nakkheeran magazine would have been remarkable. That is why Nakkheeran is Tamil Nadu’s No 1 yellow journal, it is our fate.”

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Dravidian Stocks Politicize Ilaiyaraaja’s Daughter Bhavatharini’s Demise; Post Vile Comments Attacking Ilaiyaraaja, Modi And Lord Ram

Ilaiyaraaja’s daughter and singer Bhavatharini passed away on 25 January 2024 due to cancer.

While the entire nation joins him in mourning for his irreplaceable loss, some Dravidian Stocks found the right time to politicize the situation. Comments from the Dravidian Stocks range from accusing Ilaiyaraaja’s bad karma for supporting BJP, linking his “bad” fortune with Modi, questioning his descendants, posting derogatory pictures of Sri Ram, and saying Sri Ram failed to save his daughter despite Ilaiyaraaja praying to him.

It’s common for people from the Dravidian background to make such comments when someone who supports their opposite ideas dies. Even TN Sports minister Udhayanidhi Stalin had remarked during his 2021 election canvassing that Sushma Swaraj and Arun Jaitley ‘died due to Modi’s torture and pressure’ making light of their demise. This comment did not go down well with the daughters of both leaders, and they hit back with strongly worded comments against Udhayanidhi.

Below are some vile comments posted by Dravidian stock attacking Ilaiyaraaja.

We warn our readers that some of these comments may be highly inappropriate. 

https://twitter.com/SitaMaa003/status/1750552994452824478

https://twitter.com/SitaMaa003/status/1750551789014036745

https://twitter.com/Mr_Pistal/status/1750547610065367505

(With inputs from @sona_sebin)

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

ASI Report Of Gyanvapi Site Reveals Broken Idols Of Ganesha, Hanuman, Shiva Lingam

ASI survey confirms there was a grand Hindu temple under Gyanvapi
Idols of Hindu deities found under Gyanvapi

Images: India Today

The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) survey report on the Gyanvapi Mosque has infused a fresh ray of hope for Hindus. Photographs from the 839-page document provide irrefutable evidence of a pre-existing Hindu temple beneath the mosque’s imposing structure.

The detailed evidence contains pictures of revered Hindu deities like Hanuman, Ganesha, and Nandi lying desecrated within the mosque complex. The photos also reveal the discovery of several yoni pattas (the base of a Shiva ling) and a Shiva linga with its bottom part or base missing.

Images of Lord Ganesha and Lord Hanuman in ASI report

Advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain, representing the Hindu side, described the report’s documentation of the positions and measurements of idols at a press conference last evening. 

This inscription leaves no room for doubt – a grand Hindu temple, Adivishwara, stood tall on this very spot before its brutal destruction,” Jain said.

Coin bearing Persian legend on both sides, issued by King Shah Alam II.
Coins, issued by King Shah Alam II, as mentioned in the ASI report.

A total of 34 inscriptions were recorded during the current inspection, and 32 estampages were taken. These are inscriptions on the stones of pre-existing Hindu temples which have been reused during construction of the existing structure,” Jain stated, adding that the inscriptions are in Devanagari, Grantha, Telugu and Kannada scripts. 

Yoni-patta without Shivling found under Gyanvapi
Yoni-patta without Shivling, included in the ASI report on Gyanvapi

He added that debris of idols of Hindu deities and remnants of pillars from the older temple were used in the mosque’s construction. He read out specific details within the report, including those describing inscriptions in Persian on stone slabs that provide an account of the temple’s demolition during the reign of Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb in the 17th century.

hoto of sandstone slab inscribed with Persian text discovered during ASI survey of Gyanvapi.
A sandstone slab with Persian text was found during the ASI survey of Gyanvapi.

According to Jain, these findings strongly suggest the existence of a grand Hindu temple at the site of the Gyanvapi mosque. “This evidence indicates that when Aurangzeb demolished the temple of Adivishwara in the 17th century, a grand temple existed there,” he added.

These inscriptions contain three names of deities: Janardhana, Rudra, and Umesvara. The report noted that terms such as Maha-muktimandapa mentioned in three inscriptions are significant. 

However, Akhlaq Ahmed, representing the Anjuman Anjamiya Masjid Committee, has categorically refuted the Hindu side’s claims. He dismissed the report’s findings as mere reiterations of what an Advocate Commission discovered during previous court-mandated proceedings.

The only difference is that ASI has written its measurements this time. But the Hindu side’s claims are unfounded and lack expert validation,” said Ahmed.

Ahmed also questioned the Hindu side’s expertise in determining the age of the building materials. He pointed out that the ASI report itself does not specify the age of the stones.

Regarding mentioning Hindu deities in the ASI report’s photographs, Ahmed maintained that the idols found are not authentic.

Following an order of the district court passed on July 21 last year, the ASI carried out a scientific survey of the Gyanvapi premises to determine whether the mosque was constructed over a preexisting Hindu temple structure. The ASI submitted its survey report to the district court in a sealed cover on December 18.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Fmr Editor Of The Hindu, Malini Parthasarathy, Condemns The Publication For Their Stand On Annamalai

Tamil Nadu Bharatiya Janata Party Chief K Annamalai had criticised allegedly biased journalists while explaining layers of the DMK onion at a book release function in 2022. He accused the first layer of journalists of promoting the Dravidian model and criticised their response to civilised debates. Following his comments on News18 Tamil Editor Karthigaichelvan’s interview of DMK Sports Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin earlier in January 2023, Annamalai refused to apologise for calling the interview ‘toothless.’ Journalists demanded an apology and planned a protest. Subsequently, Annamalai posted a video highlighting the alleged biases of certain journalists, emphasising his stand against biased reporting. 

A protest meeting at Valluvar Kottam in Chennai, attended by senior journalists and journalist association office-bearers, strongly condemned the “inappropriate” comments made by TNBJP chief Annamalai against media persons.

N. Ram, Director of The Hindu Group Publishing Private Limited, emphasised that Annamalai’s remarks were not an isolated incident and suggested filing a criminal defamation case against him while advocating for limiting his publicity. Ram highlighted that even prominent BJP leaders like Vajpayee, Advani, and Modi refrained from making such derogatory comments.  Ram also said, “.. they say we must starve them of oxygen. I am not saying he (Annamalai) is a terrorist but he is an extremist. He is behaving that way. So we must not give him that oxygen. We are not asking for his removal from the BJP, that is not our business. We condemn your offence, if you do not mend your ways, then we will think about it. He cannot just issue an apology for a formality and continue business as usual.”

Nakkheeran Editor R.R. Gopal announced a media boycott of the BJP leader, accusing him of employing a ‘divide and rule’ strategy.

Other senior journalists and media organisation representatives joined in condemning Annamalai’s “insensitive” remarks, highlighting the need for responsible discourse in political leadership and media relations.

Following this, Malini Parthasarathy, Director at Kasturi & Sons Ltd., former Chairperson of The Hindu Group, and former Editor at The Hindu, expressed her concerns on the issue on her X handle. She wrote that as a significant stakeholder in The Hindu, she felt compelled to address what she perceived as biased and prejudiced news reports on their pages. Malini criticised the journalists in Chennai for attacking the TN BJP chief, especially the call to blackout coverage, deeming it unacceptable for any reputable news organisation. She emphasised that it would be a violation of the right to freedom of expression if The Hindu complies with the boycott call. Malini pointed out the absence of condemnation by the same journalists for the Madurai police booking the editor and publisher of Dinamalar over their report on the prohibition of various celebrations across Tamil Nadu for Ram Mandir Pran Prathishta. She clarified that her comments were not a defence of freedom of expression as claimed by those who consider themselves guardians of a free press.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Freedom Fighters’ Kith & Kin Ignored On Republic Day In TN; Kin Allege They Were Not Honoured Properly

At the Republic Day ceremony held at Armed Forces ground in Madurai, the kith and kin of freedom fighters were annoyed that they were not given due respect at the function. The video of the incident was making the rounds on social media platform X.

The video begins with the police trying to pacify some angry relatives of the freedom fighters who were attending the Republic Day function. The angry relatives were also seen having some heated arguments with others who were present in the place, who were also trying to pacify them.

One of the participants, the wife of a freedom fighter, said, ‘They honoured four freedom fighters next of kin with shawls and left. For the rest of us, no shawls were offered. We are the wives of the freedom fighters. We sent them to fight for the country, and we were suffering back at home. Shouldn’t they pay the same level of respect to us as well? They didn’t do that, that’s why he is angry (referring to the elderly person at the beginning of the video). Only two rows of us are remaining, hundreds have left. Only 50 of us are remaining, if they can’t pay respect to us, then what does this mean?’

Another participant added, ‘I am from Paravai municipality. I am the son of a freedom fighter. I am the son of Sonaimuthu. My name is Subbiah. I am maintaining the Gandhi statue, I am offering my service from 2014 until now. We came to this armed forces ground to pay our respects to the district collector and the flag. But we didn’t get respect, so I am asking the district collector and CM Stalin to give us due respect. Jai Hind.’

He then continued to say, ‘Sahayam used to honour each and everyone of us without fail. He honoured us with shawls and paid respect. What we are asking the District Collector – they called the next of kin of freedom fighters for a meeting and about 24 of us participated. All we are asking now is to honour all of us next of kin with shawls and pay respect to us. Honouring ten people with shawls is not paying respect. How much time is it going to take? (The community) should know who the freedom fighters are and who their relatives are. This culture should not be destroyed. Future generations should know about the freedom fighters and what their relatives are doing now.’

While controversial people like Mohammed Zubair and Vairamuthu are being honoured by the Tamil Nadu government, it is sad to see that deserving people are being left out.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

How The Supreme Court Handled Religious Remarks Differently In Nupur Sharma & Swami Prasad Maurya Cases

The recent proceedings in the Supreme Court have shed light on the varying approaches taken by the judiciary when dealing with alleged religious offenses, particularly remarks made by public figures. In two distinct cases involving Samajwadi Party leader Swami Prasad Maurya and political spokesperson Nupur Sharma, the court’s responses reflect the complexity of interpreting religious sentiments and the delicate balance between freedom of expression and maintaining communal harmony.

Case 1: Swami Prasad Maurya’s Plea

Swami Prasad Maurya found himself in legal turmoil over alleged remarks made about Tulsidas’ Ramcharitmanas. The Supreme Court, during the hearing, raised questions about the state government’s sensitivity, emphasizing the matter’s interpretational nature. Justices BR Gavai and Sandeep Mehta highlighted that the issue revolved around interpretation, questioning whether it amounted to an offense.

The government’s argument, attempting to dissuade the court from staying criminal proceedings, faced resistance. Justice Mehta asserted that burning copies of the text could not be attributed to Maurya, emphasizing the importance of recognizing diverse perspectives. Eventually, the court issued notice for a four-week returnable period, staying the proceedings. However, the Allahabad High Court had earlier found prima facie grounds against Maurya, expressing concerns about incitement to rebellion and potential damage to communal harmony.

Case 2: Nupur Sharma’s “Controversial” Statements

In the case involving Nupur Sharma, a political spokesperson, the Supreme Court took a markedly different stance. Refusing to entertain her plea seeking the transfer of FIRs against her to Delhi, the bench of Justices Surya Kant and JB Pardiwala criticized Sharma for allegedly fanning flames across the country. The court accused her of arrogance and emphasized that being a party spokesperson did not grant a licence for inflammatory remarks.

The court, in strong terms, held Sharma “single-handedly responsible” for the situation and urged her to apologize to the entire nation. The rejection of her plea led to a withdrawal, underlining the seriousness of the court’s dissatisfaction with her conduct.

The contrasting approaches in these cases highlight the judiciary’s struggle to strike a balance between freedom of expression and the prevention of communal disharmony. In Maurya’s case, the court leaned towards protecting the right to interpret religious texts freely, expressing skepticism about the state’s sensitivity. On the other hand, Sharma’s case saw a more assertive stance, with the court holding her accountable for her statements and rejecting her plea unequivocally.

The judgments indicate the judiciary’s commitment to maintaining communal harmony and preventing the incitement of violence based on religious sentiments. However, the challenge lies in consistently applying these principles across cases, ensuring that the interpretation of religious remarks remains nuanced and unbiased. These cases serve as a reminder of the delicate nature of handling religious sentiments and the nuanced approach required to uphold constitutional values while safeguarding the social fabric.

Symbianian is a freelance writer.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.