Facebook Instagram X Youtube
Tuesday, May 12, 2026
Facebook Instagram X Youtube
Home Blog Page 636

Remembering Those Who Died And Survived In The 1998 Coimbatore Blasts Masterminded By Al Ummah Terrorist SA Basha

By
The Commune
-
Here Are The Names Of Victims Who Died In 1998 Coimbatore Blasts Masterminded By Al Ummah Terrorist SA Basha Who Seeman And Thirumavalavan Glorified

14 February, a date associated with celebrating love on Valentine’s Day, became a sombre day in Coimbatore’s history. It was a black day for the city, stemming from events that began on 27 November 1997, when a policeman named Selvaraj was killed by unidentified individuals. This tragedy culminated in the Coimbatore blasts on 14 February 1998, with 18 explosions occurring in just four days. L.K. Advani was initially scheduled to address the gathering in support of CP Radhakrishnan for the upcoming polls at RS Puram, marking a day etched in Coimbatore’s history with sorrow.

The aftermath was heart-wrenching, resulting in the loss of 58 lives and leaving 252 individuals with serious injuries for life. The economic toll was significant, with losses amounting to several crores.

The wounds from the devastating 1998 Coimbatore bomb blasts, orchestrated by Basha’s Islamist fundamentalist organization Al Ummah, remain fresh in the minds of the victims and their families.

The following is the list of those who tragically lost their lives in this devastating event:

RS Puram: Muthu Lakshmi, Rukmabhai, Balu, Ranganathan, Rajendran, Vidyasagar, Arjunan, Sakthivel, Muthusamy, V. Siva Kumar, and R. Siva Kumar.

Mettupalayam: Siva, Poojari Mani, Ranganath, Jeganathan, Sabareesh, Rajesh, and Ravi Shankar.

Rajendran Textiles: P. Rajendra, Dhana Lakshmi, Dhana Bakhiyam, Chitra, M. Rajendran, and Krishnan.

Sivanandha Colony BJP office: Nagaraj, Prabhu, Towers Sundaram, Sheela, Govindaraj, and Saminathan.

National Travels: Baiju, Sundara Murthy, and Bala Krishnan.

Government Hospital: a nurse Varnam was also among the victims.

The Railway Station: Suresh

Kannappan Nagar: lost Seetha Lakshmi.

Sir Sanmugham Road: Siva Kumar, Rajesh, Rangaraj, Jeganathan, Sabarinathan, Mani, Mohana Sundari, Malar Vizhi, and Ravi Shankar.

Kani Ravuthar Street: Sokanathan, Ranganathan, Rama Krishnan, Murugesan, Devaraj, Vijaya, and Suruli Rajan. These victims will forever be remembered in Coimbatore’s heart.

Those Who Survived Remain Scarred For Life

The series of devastating blasts that shattered the tranquility of Coimbatore on that fateful day cast a long and dark shadow. This tragic event inflicted a profound trauma that the entire city has been grappling with ever since. It’s worth noting that these horrific blasts occurred during the tenure of the DMK government.

While the memories of the blasts may have faded in the minds of some politicians, the wounds are far from healed for the survivors and their families. Here, we present a collection of stories that shed light on the enduring pain and resilience of those who lived through that fateful day.

Cry Of A Mother Who Lost Her Young Son

25 years later, the ageing mother remembers the painful day with tears. She says, “Today is the death anniversary of my son who I toiled so hard to bring up. He would have been 35 today, I am extremely upset. All my sons have passed. He promised me as a child that he would study well and take good care of me.” The mother wails in front of his photo and cannot control her grief at the loss of her son.

Few Other Victim Testimonies

One victim shares, “I have no record of who admitted me to the hospital, and I remain in the dark about the details. I’ve tried in vain to discover who transported me from one hospital to another.”

Another survivor recounts, “I was injured on that fateful Saturday, 14 February, and regained consciousness only on Monday. The intensity of the blast and the mastermind behind it were so formidable that it felt like no one should have survived. The blasts even occurred right at the hospital entrance.”

Another victim displays the scars on his legs, his father voices his anguish at the failure of the justice system. He passionately argues that the perpetrators, the terrorists responsible for such heinous crimes, should have faced severe punishment, even capital punishment. He draws a poignant parallel, mentioning that Saddam Hussein was executed for his deeds. There are others like him in India, he insists, who must be held accountable through the harshest penalties. He says, “The perpetrators, the terrorists should have been punished severely and given capital punishment for the heinous crimes they committed. They even killed Saddam Hussein. There are many like him in India and they must be punished with hanging.”

The father of the victim shares his pain. He asks, “What is the point of the existence of the government? We have seen what the victims have gone through, but I have never seen anything so cruel in my entire life. We used to live like one family, and they must be punished for what they have done. We Hindus are the majority, have we ever done anything like this? No one bothers about the victims; they carry on with their work. They are basically scared that something else will happen to them.”

Another victim who, on that ill-fated day, had set out to distribute invitations for his daughter’s wedding but returned home as a burnt figure. His ageing mother and sister were dependent on him in many ways.

The Story Of Rangaraj Who Faced Multiple Blasts & Injuries

Rangaraj, a survivor of the Coimbatore blasts that occurred on 14 February 1998, still bears the physical and financial scars of that fateful day. His leg continues to ache, but the burden of medical expenses makes getting a scan an unaffordable luxury.

He shares the harrowing experience of the day, where he found himself caught in two bomb blasts, with the second causing severe injuries. After being carried to General Hospital (GH) by a compassionate policeman, another bomb blast occurred at the hospital following which he was shifted to Kuppusamy Naidu Hospital and KG Hospital. Subsequent treatment, including an operation conducted after a month, was excruciatingly painful.

Over 25 years and six surgeries, he continues to grapple with the aftermath. Severe damage to his hands and legs, compounded by grafting flesh from his thighs, leaves him in constant pain. Even mild itching can lead to infection, and his family remains unaware of his suffering to spare them further heartache.

His body is filled with shrapnel, necessitating scans and specialised treatment. However, financial constraints serve as a formidable obstacle. In the early stages, he was given medicines to address the embedded shrapnel, with the expectation that these fragments would gradually work their way out.

Rangaraj mentions one very important point. He said, “The blasts occurred in a Muslim-dominated area, but eerily, no one was present when the explosions transpired. It was as if they had prior knowledge. We behaved and worked with them as if we were family.”

Rangaraj also said, “Bomb blasts should never occur anywhere in the world. When they do, numerous individuals like me become victims of the ensuing devastation. I’ve endured this unrelenting pain for the past two decades, and I fervently pray that such a tragic incident should never happen again. It is my heartfelt plea that we remember and consider the enduring suffering of the victims.”

Victim Testimony – Live On With The Pain

Speaking to one of the survivors, a reporter inquires about the number of injured, to which the survivor responds, “14.” She vividly recalls her proximity to the bomb blast, an experience that left her with disfigured feet. Tragically, at least six of her colleagues who were working with her at the shop lost their lives in the explosion. The repercussions of her injuries have persisted over the years. Despite the passage of time, the victims says the pain in her feet remains a constant reminder of that fateful day. Her ordeal led to a two-month hospitalisation as medical professionals worked tirelessly to address her injuries.

The enduring physical and emotional scars serve as a poignant testament to the lasting impact of the Coimbatore blasts on their lives.

Survivors & Families Of Victims Do Not Want Release Of Terrorists

These survivors and families of victims vehemently oppose the release of the terrorists responsible for the Coimbatore blasts. Their conviction stems from the profound suffering they’ve endured, and they fervently wish to prevent others from experiencing the same fate. One survivor shares the daily struggle of grappling with the memory of her son, particularly as the anniversary of his passing approaches. She says, “These people should never be released. Only I know how much I have suffered as a result of the blasts. No one else must suffer my fate. I pass my days/life by thinking of my son daily. As the date approaches, I feel miserable. But I do not show it outside and carry on with my work. Every year we perform the rites on his death anniversary. If I continue thinking of him, I will fall ill and there is no one to take care of me now, so I have left everything to God and carried on with my life over the past 20 years. I brought up my brother’s son and took care of him. I am alone now. When asked about how things had changed after the blasts, she replied saying, at least 10 people died in this area. My uncle’s son, my uncle’s grandson, an aunt, a sister – all my relatives, died in the blasts and a few others died.”

https://twitter.com/Kumari_Jeyan/status/1711747074335944979

Reporter Mani’s Account Of The Tragedy

Reporter Mani provides a harrowing account of his experience covering the terrorist attack in Coimbatore, an event that left an indelible mark on his memory. He emphasises that in his entire life, both before and after that day, he has never witnessed such a catastrophic event. The shadow of death loomed ominously, casting a pall over the entire area. Tensions ran high, and people congregated in groups, chanting slogans directed against Muslims and the DMK government, with particular focus on M. Karunanidhi. Being a journalist to collect information on the blasts, he visited the hospital, where he learned that the bomb had exploded just outside. Notably, L.K. Advani himself arrived to inspect the aftermath, marking the gravity of the situation.

Mani said, “Advani had come to support CP Radhakrishnan’s election campaign at RS Puram. The blast occurred approximately 800 meters away from the campaign site, with the first bomb detonating at the railway station. Over that harrowing day, 12 bomb blasts unfolded, commencing at 3:50 PM and concluding around 10:30 PM. Of these, 10 bombs or so were detonated. The toll was devastating, with 58 lives lost and over 200 individuals injured. The perpetrators had even placed bombs in hospitals, tragically resulting in the deaths of a doctor, two nurses, and a patient at Kovai General Hospital.”

Reporter Mani said he visited the site the following morning, bearing witness to the grim aftermath, with bloodstains as a stark testament to the tragedy. The bombs were concealed in various vehicles and objects, from cars, motorcycles, and cycles to rexin bags, leather bags, school grounds, hotels, pubs, and bus stands – a chilling diversity of hiding places that defied imagination. He said, “The Coimbatore serial bomb blasts, which occurred in 1998, were preceded by the 1993 Mumbai bombings, making them a significant national tragedy. Notably, it was widely believed at the time and later confirmed that L.K. Advani was the primary target of the attack.

In the wake of these events, M. Karunanidhi, who was the Chief Minister in 1998, initiated an inquiry commission led by retired Chief Justice PR Gokulakrishnan of the Gujarat High Court, a Tamilian, to investigate the circumstances surrounding the attacks and assess the security provided to Advani. The commission delivered an interim report in 1998 and a final report in 2000. In the final report, it was revealed that three terrorists (names specified in the report) had infiltrated Advani’s proximity with the intent of carrying out suicide bombings. One of the primary targets of the serial blasts was indeed Advani. This crucial information is documented in the Justice PR Gokulakrishnan Committee report, highlighting the terrorists’ plan to assassinate Advani while he delivered a speech at RS Puram. They aimed to approach him from different directions, but due to stringent security measures akin to those for a Prime Minister, they were unable to execute their plan, ultimately thwarting a potentially catastrophic suicide bomb attack.”

On 11 October 2023, the hastag #CoimbatoreWillNotForgive was trending on social media platform X where some important testimonies were shared relating to the terror attack. In an interview with Behindwoods, a security officer in charge recounts an incident where an individual donning BJP-related attire had bombs on his body on the stage.

“An unexploded car bomb forced us to flee our own home. All the people in the ~10 streets surrounding the car bomb were evacuated. My father left the new house he had worked so hard to build, crying. We experience the pain of the Sri Lankan Tamils and Kashmir Pandits who were forced to flee their homes. Forgetting all this and begging for votes now, Coimbatore will never forgive Edappadi, EDMK, ADMK”, wrote another.

 

Last Word

Dravidianist political leaders in Tamil Nadu stoop so low for their minority appeasement politics that they even glorify a terrorist. SA Basha, a dreaded Islamist and founder of Al Ummah terrorist outfit, notorious for his role in terror attacks across Tamil Nadu during the 1980s and 1990s, was described by these leaders as a “martyr for a cause” and even compared to a father figure.

Will the cries and sorrow of those who have lost their children, husbands, and wives reach the hearts of politicians who, in their desperate bid for votes, praise a terrorist—saying he is a loss to society?

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“Dei Father Enna Da Ithellam”, India’s Leading Off-Spinner, R Ashwin Humourously Responds After His Father’s “Humiliation” Comments Go Viral

By
The Commune
-
Leading Off-Spinner, R Ashwin Humourously Responds After His Father's Comments Go Viral

Ravichandran Ashwin, India’s leading off-spinner with 500 Test wickets, has spoken out about a significant comment by his father, Ravichandran, following Ashwin’s unexpected retirement from international cricket. Ashwin retired after the third Test in the Border-Gavaskar Trophy ended in a draw in Brisbane, leaving two Tests remaining in the series. Despite being the world’s highest Test wicket-taker among active players with 537 wickets, Ashwin announced right after the match that he would no longer participate in international cricket.

On 19 December, his father suggested that “humiliation” might have influenced the abrupt decision. Ashwin was selected for only one of the three tests in the ongoing series.

Ravichandran shared his thoughts in an interview with private news media, saying, “There’s no doubt it was emotional for the family, considering he had been on the field for almost 14-15 years. The sudden retirement was a shock, but at the same time, we also expected it due to the humiliation he faced. How long could he tolerate that? Perhaps he made the decision on his own.”

He added, “I found out at the last minute. What was going through his mind, I don’t know. He just announced it, and I accepted it with complete understanding. While one part of me was happy, another part wasn’t, as I felt he should have continued.”

Ravichandran emphasized, “Ultimately, it’s Ashwin’s choice, and I cannot interfere with that. But there could be several reasons behind the way he announced his retirement. Only Ashwin knows, maybe it was due to the humiliation he endured.”

The comment to the private media channel quickly gained traction, sparking widespread speculation and various narratives. Soon “All in All” commentator Sumanth Raman barged in, asking Ashwin, “@ashwinravi99, dad says humiliation was going on and how long could he be expected to tolerate it?”

Ashwin breaking his silence on the statement by his father gave his befitting reply with humor stated, “My dad isn’t media trained, dey father enna da ithelaam. I never thought you would follow this rich tradition of “dad statements.” Request you all to forgive him and leave him alone.”

Upon his arrival in Chennai on 19 December, Ashwin reassured his fans, giving them a boost by confirming that he wasn’t done with cricket. Speaking to the media, he confirmed that he would continue to play for the Chennai Super Kings in the upcoming Indian Premier League season. “I am going to play for CSK. Don’t be surprised if I aim to play for as long as I can. I don’t think Ashwin the cricketer is done, but Ashwin the Indian cricketer has probably called it a day. That’s it,” Ashwin said.

(With inputs from NDTV)

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“No Alliance With AIADMK Or TVK In 2026,” Declares BJP TN President K Annamalai

By
The Commune
-
No Alliance With AIADMK Or TVK In 2026, Declares BJP Annamalai

Tamil Nadu BJP President K Annamalai has firmly stated that the party will not form an electoral alliance with the AIADMK, its former ally, or the newly formed political party Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) for the 2026 Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly elections. He also predicted that the state would witness a five-cornered contest in 2026 and anticipated the formation of a coalition government. “Whoever forms the government in Tamil Nadu in 2026, it will be a coalition government,” Annamalai remarked.

During an interview with a private media, Annamalai welcomed actor Vijay’s entry into politics, acknowledging his prominence. “A person at the top stepping into politics is commendable. However, he will face challenges, including betrayal. Let Vijay embark on a long political journey like Jayalalithaa. Politics cannot change overnight; it requires persistence,” he stated.

Discussing the political landscape in Tamil Nadu, Annamalai pointed out the five major players – DMK, AIADMK, BJP, Naam Tamilar Katchi (NTK), and TVK. Each party, follows its own unique political strategy. “DMK claims they are doing politics right. AIADMK says they aim to fix the state. BJP promises to bring in new politics, and Seeman of NTK asks for a chance,” he explained.

Annamalai highlighted the evolving nature of Tamil Nadu politics, emphasizing the likelihood of a coalition government in 2026. He expressed his desire for a BJP-led coalition, stating, “The field has changed. I want a BJP-led coalition government to be formed in 2026.” However, he dismissed the possibility of forming alliances with AIADMK or TVK, asserting, “There will be no alliance with AIADMK or TVK in the 2026 assembly elections.”

He also acknowledged Nainar Nagendran’s suggestion for political unity but emphasized that the current political climate makes such coalitions challenging. As the BJP state president, he concluded, he must weigh his words carefully and focus on fostering BJP’s leadership in Tamil Nadu politics.

(With inputs from Dinamalar)

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

NGT Orders Kerala To Clear Illegally Dumped Biomedical Waste In Tamil Nadu Within 3 Days

By
The Commune
-
NGT Orders Kerala To Clear Illegally Dumped Biomedical Waste In Tamil Nadu Within 3 Days

On 19 December 2024, the Southern Bench of the National Green Tribunal (NGT) instructed the Kerala government and its Pollution Control Board to clear the illegally dumped biomedical and mixed solid waste found at several locations along the border of Tamil Nadu’s Tirunelveli district within three days. The tribunal also demanded a compliance report to be submitted by 23 December 2024.

Reports indicated that hazardous biomedical waste from Kerala is being clandestinely dumped in Tamil Nadu, often during the night, in pristine forests, water bodies, and farmlands. Previously, such incidents were reported in areas like Anamalai, Theni, and Nanguneri. Currently, waste is found in four locations: Kodaganallur, Palavoor, Kondanagaram, and Sivalarkulam, all within the Tirunelveli district.

It was revealed that the biomedical waste originated from institutions such as the Regional Cancer Centre (RCC) in Thiruvananthapuram and Credence Private Hospital, while municipal waste came from Leela Kovalam. The NGT initiated the case suo moto and notices have been issued to these entities and to the environmental and health departments of both Kerala and Tamil Nadu for their failure to prevent this illegal activity.

A bench comprising Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana and expert member K. Satyagopal directed Kerala to either retrieve the waste or establish a formal agreement with Tamil Nadu’s Common Biomedical Waste Treatment Facility for proper disposal. “The waste must be removed without delay,” the bench ordered, providing a three-day deadline.

Tamil Nadu government pleader D. Shanmuganathan stated that the Kerala State Pollution Control Board (KSPCB) failed to comply with an earlier tribunal order from June, which required it to pay ₹69,000 to cover the cost incurred by the local body for removing waste dumped along Nanguneri’s roadsides.

Officials from the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board (TNPCB) confirmed that a detailed investigation is underway to assess the volume of biomedical waste dumped. Counsel Sai Sathya Jith highlighted that TNPCB’s chairperson has written to KSPCB’s chairperson demanding legal action against RCC and other offenders, along with stricter border monitoring. Two FIRs have been filed by the Suthamalli police under various sections, including Sections 271 and 272 of the IPC, Section 15 (1) of the Environment Protection Act, and Section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Open Places (Prevention of Disfigurement) Act.

KSPCB counsel V.K. Rema Smrithi acknowledged the waste originated in Kerala and assured that criminal proceedings would be initiated against the culprits. She noted that unauthorized waste collectors, operating without government recognition, were responsible for this illegal activity.

Local activists pointed out that both the police and transport departments of Kerala and Tamil Nadu bear responsibility for these incidents. They emphasized that stricter monitoring of the narrow Sengottai road, the primary interstate route in the area, and enhanced vigilance at the border check-posts could mitigate the problem.

Improper disposal of biomedical waste poses significant risks to human health and the environment, as it is highly infectious and requires strict management under Biomedical Waste Management Rules.

(With inputs from TNIE)

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Nehru’s Betrayal: How Cong Govt Silenced Ambedkar And Abandoned Hindu Code Bill

By
The Commune
-
Nehru's Betrayal: How Cong Govt Silenced Ambedkar And Abandoned Hindu Code Bill

Dr BR Ambedkar’s resignation as India’s Law Minister in 1951 was a significant event, driven by multiple grievances regarding the government’s treatment of marginalized communities, its foreign policy, and its failure to advance the Hindu Code Bill. Ambedkar’s frustration had been building over the years, particularly with the government’s failure to allocate him substantial administrative responsibilities despite his qualifications. He had hoped to be entrusted with the Planning Department, but was excluded, and was not considered for key Cabinet committees like Foreign Affairs or Defence. Even his appointment to the Economics Affairs Committee was only due to his protest.

Ambedkar’s resignation was not only due to personal disappointment but also because of the government’s neglect of the Scheduled Castes and Backward Classes. Despite constitutional safeguards, these communities continued to face oppression, and their condition had not improved. The government’s failure to address these issues, while prioritizing Muslim protection, angered Ambedkar. He pointed out the minimal representation of Scheduled Castes in government service, which was far below the 12.5% guarantee outlined in the Constitution.

Ambedkar also expressed his concerns regarding the government’s foreign policy, which he felt had isolated India from its allies, particularly over issues related to Kashmir and East Bengal. He proposed partitioning Kashmir to resolve tensions and criticized the colossal military expenditure of Rs. 180 crores annually as a direct result of the government’s foreign policy. This, combined with his frustrations over India’s strained relations with Pakistan, particularly concerning Kashmir, led to Ambedkar’s deep dissatisfaction with the government’s priorities.

However, it was the mishandling of the Hindu Code Bill that pushed Ambedkar to resign. The Bill, introduced in 1947, was meant to be a landmark social reform. Despite Cabinet support to pass the Bill in the last sessions of Parliament, the Prime Minister proposed a truncated version, focusing only on the Marriage and Divorce section. Ambedkar agreed to this as a compromise, but then, the Prime Minister suggested abandoning even this part of the Bill. Ambedkar was shocked by this decision, believing that the Bill was not dropped due to a lack of time but because more influential Cabinet members sought to prioritize their own Bills.

Ambedkar criticized the Chief Whip for obstructing the Bill’s progress, claiming that the Whip had been disloyal to the Prime Minister and absent during crucial discussions. He refuted the notion that the Bill had been dropped due to strong opposition, pointing out that internal party divisions showed minimal resistance. The Hindu Code Bill had overwhelming support within the Party, and divisions in the House had repeatedly resulted in favorable outcomes for the Bill. Despite this, the Bill was killed with minimal progress, and Ambedkar felt that the government’s failure to address this crucial reform undermined the spirit of the Constitution.

Dr. Ambedkar’s resignation statement was a public protest against these failures. He felt that the Hindu Code was the most significant social reform in India’s history, and abandoning it would undermine the nation’s constitutional progress. He expressed his deep frustration with the Cabinet’s functioning, which he believed had become a mere registration office for decisions already made by Committees. Despite his deep disappointment, Ambedkar remained true to his principles and resigned, choosing to walk away from a government that he felt had failed to address the core issues he cared about.

Ambedkar’s resignation also highlighted his belief that Congress had long silenced and neglected Dalits. He recounted how Nehru’s government had attempted to censor his resignation speech in Parliament, marking a historical first in which Ambedkar was asked to submit a written copy of his speech for scrutiny before speaking.

Humiliated by this request, Ambedkar refused to comply, walked out of Parliament, and released his statement to the press. This act of defiance symbolized his refusal to be silenced by a government he felt had disregarded his contributions to the nation.

In his resignation, Ambedkar made it clear that his decision was not a result of ill-health, as some had speculated, but rather because of the government’s failure to address the vital issues of social justice, foreign policy, and constitutional integrity. He thanked his colleagues and Parliament members for their support during his tenure, but his resignation was an unequivocal statement of his principles, marking a turning point in his political journey.

(With inputs from Dharma Dispatch)

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“Are Muslims The Only People Who Need Protection? Are SCs, STs, & Indian Christians Not In Need Of Protection?” Ambedkar’s Charge Sheet Against Nehru And Congress

By
The Commune
-
Ambedkar criticized Congress for neglecting Scheduled Castes, misusing the Constitution's promises, and failing to advance the Hindu Code Bill.

The Congress Party and its supporters often claim to be the protectors of the Constitution and the legacy of Dr BR Ambedkar. However, this narrative seems contradictory when we examine Dr. Ambedkar’s documented views. Ambedkar himself criticized Jawaharlal Nehru and the Congress Party, accusing them of dedicating all their efforts to the protection of Muslims. He famously stated that “Nehru’s whole time and attention is devoted to the protection of the Muslims.”

This criticism is evident in Dr Ambedkar’s resignation statement, recorded in Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, Vol. 14, Part 2, first published by the Government of Maharashtra on 14 April 1979.

The Overlooked Plight of Scheduled Castes and the Focus on Muslims

In a statement, he reflects on the condition of the Scheduled Castes in India and laments the lack of attention given to their plight. He writes, “I have been wondering whether there is any other parallel in the world to the condition of the Scheduled Castes in India. I cannot find any. And yet, why is no relief granted to the Scheduled Castes?”

He goes on to compare the government’s focus on Muslims, stating, “The Prime Minister’s whole time and attention is devoted to the protection of the Muslims.” While he acknowledges the importance of protecting Muslims, he asks, “Are the Muslims the only people who need protection? Are the Scheduled Castes, the Scheduled Tribes, and the Indian Christians not in need of protection? What concern has he shown for these communities? So far as I know, none. And yet, these are the communities which need far more care and attention than the Muslims.”

Dr Ambedkar’s Concern for the Backward Classes and Nehru Government’s Neglect

Dr. B.R. Ambedkar expressed deep concern over the government’s lack of action regarding the welfare of the Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Scheduled Castes. In his resignation statement, he highlighted his dissatisfaction with the treatment of these communities under the Nehru government, “I will now refer to another matter that had made me dissatisfied with the Government. It relates to the treatment accorded to the Backward Classes and the Scheduled Castes.”

Ambedkar lamented that under the Nehru-led Congress government, the Constitution failed to include specific safeguards for the Backward Classes, leaving their future to be determined by the Executive Government based on the recommendations of a commission appointed by the President. He expressed his frustration, saying, “More than a year has elapsed since we passed the Constitution, but the Government has not even thought of appointing the Commission.”

Dr. Ambedkar’s Disappointment with Cabinet Exclusion and Unfulfilled Promises

Dr. B.R. Ambedkar accepted a position in the cabinet with the understanding that he would be assigned to the Planning Department, given his expertise as an economist. However, this promise was never kept, as Prime Minister Nehru took on the role of Chairman of the Planning Commission himself. Ambedkar was also excluded from important committees, including the Economic Affairs Committee. This lack of inclusion and unfulfilled commitments was one of the key reasons he cited for his resignation.

He says, “The Prime Minister agreed and said he would give me in addition to Law the Planning Department which, he said, he was intending to create. Unfortunately, the Planning Department came very late in the day and when it did come, I was left out. During my time, there have been many transfers of portfolios from one Minister to another. I thought I might be considered for any one of them. But I have always been left out of consideration. Many Ministers have been given two or three portfolios so that they have been overburdened. Others like me have been wanting more work. I have not even been considered for holding a portfolio temporarily when a Minister in charge has gone abroad for a few days. It is difficult to understand what is the principle underlying the distribution of Government work among Ministers which the Prime Minister follows.”

“Is it capacity? Is it trust? Is it friendship? Is it pliability? I was not even appointed to be a member of main Committees of the Cabinet such as the Foreign Affairs Committee or the Defence Committee.
When the Economic Affairs Committee was formed, I expected, in view of the fact that I was primarily a student of Economics and Finance, to be appointed to this Committee. But I was left out. I was appointed to it by the Cabinet, when the Prime Minister had gone to England. But when he returned, in one of his many essays in the reconstruction of the Cabinet, he left me out. In a subsequent reconstruction my name was added to the Committee, but that was as a result of my protest,” he added.

Dr. Ambedkar’s Disillusionment with Nehru’s Decision on the Hindu Code Bill

Dr. B.R. Ambedkar expressed his deep disappointment that, despite prior commitments, Prime Minister Nehru chose to abandon the Hindu Code Bill. In his resignation statement, Baba Saheb wrote, “I was, therefore, quite unable to accept the Prime Minister’s decision to abandon the (Hindu Code) Bill on the ground of time. I have been obliged to give this elaborate explanation for my resignation because some people have suggested that I am going because of my illness. I wish to repudiate any such suggestion. I am the last man to abandon my duty because of illness.”

This article is based on an X thread by Dilip Mandal.

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

‘Congress Press Knows Only How To Criticise, Rebuke And Revile Me’: Ambedkar Was Aware Of Media Bias

By
The Commune
-
'Congress Press Knows Only How To Criticise, Rebuke And Revile Me': Ambedkar Was Aware Of Media Bias

B.R. Ambedkar, one of India’s most influential leaders and the architect of the Indian Constitution, was no stranger to the hostile and derogatory cartoons that depicted him throughout his lifetime. These cartoons, which often mocked his stature and ideologies, were not only a reflection of the deeply ingrained caste biases of the time but also a tool used by the media to undermine his work. Ambedkar, however, was acutely aware of the role the media played in shaping public opinion about him, and he did not shy away from responding to these attacks, critiquing the press for its bias and hostility.

In the early years of his political career, Ambedkar was largely respected for his intellectual contributions and leadership in the fight for Dalit rights. However, as he became a national figure and assumed the pivotal role of the Chairman of the Drafting Committee of the Indian Constitution, the tone of the media changed. Cartoons began to appear that sought to diminish his stature and question his leadership. These cartoons, created by prominent cartoonists, often portrayed Ambedkar as a villain or a figure of ridicule.

One of the most significant sources of these caricatures was the press, which Ambedkar often criticized for its one-sidedness. In 1943, during a lecture on the 101st birthday of Govind Ranade, Ambedkar expressed his frustration with the media, specifically the Congress Press, which he accused of misrepresenting his actions and intentions. He described the Congress Press as a mouthpiece that could only criticize and distort his arguments, rather than engage in meaningful debate. His words were a pointed critique of how the media, which controlled public discourse, failed to fairly represent him and his contributions to the nation.

Ambedkar’s awareness of the media’s portrayal of him was not limited to verbal criticism. He recognized the power of the press in shaping public perception, and he was determined not to allow it to define his legacy. As he once stated, “With the Press in hand, it is easy to manufacture Great Men.” Ambedkar was well aware that the same press could also destroy reputations and vilify individuals, especially those challenging the status quo. His critical stance on the media was informed by his understanding of how the press could manipulate public opinion, particularly in the context of his advocacy for Dalit rights and social justice.

The cartoons on Ambedkar that emerged during this time were not simply humorous jabs; they were part of a larger effort to marginalize him and his work. These cartoons often depicted Ambedkar in a demeaning light, portraying him as an incompetent leader or a threat to the established social order. One notorious example from the 1960s, published in the NCERT textbook, showed Ambedkar being chased by Jawaharlal Nehru with a whip, symbolizing the frustration of the political elite with the slow pace of drafting the Constitution. While the cartoon was meant to reflect the political dynamics of the time, it also reduced Ambedkar to an object of ridicule.

Ambedkar’s response to such depictions was measured yet firm. He understood that these attacks were rooted in a deep-seated animosity toward the lower castes and their demand for equal rights. He believed that the hostility from the press and the political establishment was a manifestation of the caste hatred that prevailed in Indian society. Ambedkar’s own words on this subject, “This animosity of the Congress Press towards me can to my mind, not unfairly, be explained as a reflex of the hatred of the Hindus for the Untouchables,” highlight his understanding of the systemic forces at play. He saw the press’s hostility as a reflection of broader social dynamics, where the demands for Dalit rights were perceived as a challenge to the traditional social order.

Despite the vitriol he faced, Ambedkar remained steadfast in his mission. He chose to address the media’s attacks head-on, often using his own publications to bypass mainstream media channels that he felt were hostile to his ideas. Ambedkar launched several publications, including Mook Nayak (The Voice of the Voiceless), Bahiskrit Bharat (Excluded India), and Prabuddh Bharat (Enlightened India), to present his ideas and counter the negative narratives being propagated in the mainstream press. However, due to a lack of resources, these publications struggled to compete with the large, business-backed newspapers that dominated the media landscape.

Ambedkar’s criticisms of the press and the media’s portrayal of him were not just about defending his own image but also about challenging the larger social order that sought to suppress the voices of the marginalized. He understood that media, in its various forms, could either elevate or destroy individuals and movements. In his case, the media’s portrayal of him was a direct reflection of the caste-based discrimination he was fighting against.

The issue of how Ambedkar was depicted in cartoons and the media has continued to be relevant long after his death. In recent years, the publication of cartoons about Ambedkar has sparked controversy, most notably with the 2012 incident involving a cartoon in the NCERT textbook. The cartoon, which depicted Nehru with a whip chasing a snail labeled ‘Constitution,’ was seen by some as offensive to Ambedkar and the Dalit community. The controversy led to the cartoon being removed from the textbook, but it also underscored the ongoing tension surrounding Ambedkar’s legacy and the way he is portrayed in the media.

Ambedkar’s awareness of how the media depicted him, and his efforts to respond to and challenge those depictions, remain an important part of his legacy. His criticisms of the press, his creation of alternative media platforms, and his unflinching commitment to his principles in the face of public ridicule are a testament to his resilience and foresight. Today, as Ambedkar’s iconography continues to be celebrated and debated, his response to the media’s portrayal of him serves as a reminder of the power of representation and the importance of controlling one’s own narrative in the fight for justice and equality.

(With inputs from The Print)

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

INDI Ally VCK MP Thirumavalavan Quotes Ambedkar To Say Hinduism Is A Threat To Liberty, Equality & Fraternity

By
The Commune
-
INDI Ally VCK MP Thirumavalavan Quotes Ambedkar To Say Hinduism Is A Threat To Liberty, Equality & Fraternity

VCK chief Thirumavalavan seems to have a contradictory stance on Hinduism, as he simultaneously criticizes the faith while seeking blessings at temples during election campaigns.

Amid the false propaganda spread by opposition parties, claiming that Union Home Minister Amit Shah had disrespected Dr. Ambedkar through a clipped 12-second video, which portrayed him and the party in a negative light as “anti-Dalit” and “anti-Ambedkar,” the same narrative continued to circulate in Tamil Nadu even after the full video debunked the claims. VCK chief Thirumavalavan took a unique approach by adding his own “anti-Hindu” agenda to the criticism, which was particularly shocking. Despite visiting temples to worship before elections, he hypocritically criticizes Hinduism whenever possible after the elections.

On 18 October 2024, VCK chief Thirumavalavan via his official X account stated, “How can Savarkar’s descendants tolerate the fact that the entire country is talking about revolutionary Ambedkar? #AmitShah has revealed how much they are fed up. He has torn off his own veil. This is the true face of the Sangh Parivar. The Constitution and revolutionary Ambedkar are their real enemies. This is what the Viduthalai Chiruthaigal has been continuously exposing. All the praise given by the Sangh Parivar to the revolutionary Ambedkar is a great act of deceiving the common people. The revolutionary Ambedkar takes the form of ‘universal form’ (Vishwaroopam). The conspiracy attempts of the Sanadhanis will be in ashes!”  

He further, with intent, shared an image of Ambedkar along with a quote aimed at criticizing Hinduism and Hindus, seemingly to settle a personal political score, “Whatever Hindus say, Hinduism is a threat to Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity.”

Previous Propaganda by VCK Chief Thirumavalavan Undermining Hindu Sentiments

Tirupati Laddu Prasadam Row

During the recent controversy over the presence of beef and pig fat in Tirupati Laddu Prasadam, which sparked outrage among the Hindu community, VCK leader and Chidambaram MP Thol Thirumavalavan intentionally trivialized the issue by claiming that animal fat in sweets is common, further exacerbating the situation.

A laboratory report revealed that beef tallow, fish oil, and palm oil were used to prepare laddus, distributed as prasad at the renowned Sri Venkateswara temple in Tirupati. The report’s findings indicate that the ghee used to prepare the iconic Tirupati laddu prasadam during the YSRCP regime contained traces of animal fat, including beef tallow and fish oil, leading to widespread outrage and claims of disrespect toward religious sentiments.

Speaking to a reporter after hoisting a 62-foot flag of his party near Madurai, Thirumavalavan said, “In most sweets or food products, using animal fat is normal and is a common practice across the world. I don’t know why it is being politicized. If it (Tirupati Laddu) should not contain animal/beef fat, then accordingly guidelines should be framed to prevent such occurrences in the future.”

Called Temples – A Place with Obscene Figurines

Some time ago, Thirumavalavan addressed a gathering, expressing opposition to educational policies based on Sanatana Dharma and humorously criticizes Hindu temples in front of the audience that, “if the building has a dome, it is a mosque. If it is tall and straight, it is a church. And if it has dirty figurines, it is a temple”.

https://twitter.com/Muthuhere3/status/1772928107965448550

Called For Destruction Of All Hindu Temples

Thirumavalavan is known for his anti-Hindu politics and for spreading canards about Hinduism. He had once called temple gopurams structures with ugly figurines. In 2017, Thirumavalavan called for the destruction of all Hindu temples and building of Buddhist viharas in those places.

Thirumavalavan said, “Destroy all hindu temples and in it place build Buddhist Viharas”. Addressing a gathering convened in Perambalur, VCK Chief Thirumavalavan, asserted that areas housing Shiva and Perumal temples were originally sites of Buddhist monasteries. He contended that these Buddhist structures were replaced by the construction of Shiva and Perumal temples, advocating for their demolition to pave the way for the erection of Buddhist temples in their stead. Furthermore, he proposed the establishment of Buddhist temples at the purported sites of Lord Thiruvaranganathar’s presence and the Kanji Kamachi Amman Temple.

Said Building Temples Is A Business & Profitable

In a book release event held in Chennai, Thirumavalavan said, “Building a temple is a business. I am not joking. Unlike any other business, building temples is the most profitable and provides the highest income. Which other business is more profitable than the income generated by the Tirupati temple? What are the temple’s income and expenditure? People donate money to the Tirupathi temple. People pour money into the Ayyappan temple.”

Called Women Adhering to Sanatana Dharma Prostitutes

In another occurrence during a webinar hosted by Periyarist groups, Thirumavalavan referred to women adhering to the Sanatana tradition as prostitutes. A particular excerpt from his speech circulating on social media highlights, “how are women valued in Sanatana Dharma, how are they treated? From time immemorial, how they have been oppressed and exploited… what does Sanatana Dharma say about women? Basically, women are created as prostitutes by God. All women are prostitutes as per Hindu Dharma…Manu Dharma… All women are prostitutes… that’s how they were created by God… they’re of a status lower than men. It applies to Brahmin women as well as to other women”.

Participated In Eradicate Sanatana Dharma Conference

He also took part in the September 2023 Eradicate Sanatana Dharma conference where Udhayanidhi Stalin had compared Sanatana Dharma to mosquito and dengue and said that it had to be eradicated. In the same conference, Thirumavalavan had said “Sanatana Dharma can be destroyed when we turn OBC against FC (Forward Caste).”

Peddled Lies About Sanatana Dharma Comparing It With Islam & Christianity

On International Women’s Day (8 March 2024), a special symposium took place at Chennai Ambedkar Thital, with Thirumavalavan as the chief guest discussing “Revolutionary Ambedkar and Women’s Rights.” He said, “Take Islam, Christianity, Buddhism, Jainism, or any other religion, the core fundamental philosophy of it would be fraternity i.e brotherhood. There is one religion in the world that denies brotherhood completely, they are asking do you know what is Sanatana Dharma?  Sanatana Dharma is a dharma that says there should not be brotherhood, they say that we have understood it wrongly. Today a women judge in High Court has said that Sanatana Dharma is different from rituals, yes that’s correct, as we say, rituals and principles are different, but this Sanatana Dharma’s particular principle defines hierarchy based on birth and no one can deny it.”

“The word Sanatana means permanent, that’s different, means unchanging, it is anti-physical, anti-scientific. Nothing is fixed, everything is changing, this is the law of physics, this is the dialectic rule, that is the paradox, but they are… In Sanatana Dharma discrimination is its core, discrimination is the lifeline of Sanatana Dharma in no other religion discrimination will be the basic factor, No one talks about this. They ask why I did not criticize Christianity or Islam, without criticizing them why singling out us, that is because the discrimination is here only. I’m saying that in core principles, RC (Roman Catholic) can have discrimination, it’s an institution. CSI (Church Of South India) can have discrimination, it’s an institution, but there is no discrimination in Christianity that is the difference between the two,” he added.

Insulted Periyapuranam And Hinduism

During the Nandanar Guru Puja celebration, a sacred thread ceremony was organized to promote inclusivity. One of the key highlights of the event was Governor RN Ravi presiding over a ceremony in which over 100 individuals from Adi Dravidar communities were presented with the sacred thread, known as ‘poonool’ or ‘janeu,’ traditionally worn by Brahmins and other communities. This symbolic gesture aimed to foster inclusivity and equality. However, I.N.D.I.A. ally and VCK MP seized the opportunity to launch a tirade against Hinduism.

Hitting out at Tamil Nadu Governor RN Ravi for presiding over the function in which Nandanar community were adorned the poonool, Thirumavalavan said that the act amounted to denigration the working-class people in the name of upliftment.

“This is what is Sanathanam“, he said condemning the Hindu faith.

“Does the governor say that others who do not wear poonul are inferior? Will the Governor make the Adi Dravidians who are dressed in Poonul as temple priests?“, he added.

“Let us reject the Periya Puranam which denigrates the king Nandan, as a cow-eating Pulayan“, Thirumavalavan said.

Hypocrisy They Name Is VCK – Turns Staunch Practicing Hindu During Elections

During the Lok Sabha elections in Tamil Nadu, on 27 March 2024, Thirumavalavan personally visited the Mayavan temple, the deity of his clan, in his native village of Anganur in Ariyalur district. During this visit, the temple priest welcomed Thirumavalavan by garlanding him and performing a ceremonial ritual of tying headgear (Thalaipagai) on his head. After completing special worship at the temple, Thirumavalavan submitted his nomination papers to Ariyalur District Collector and Election Conducting Officer Annie Mary Swarna, accompanied by Ministers Sivashankar and Panneerselvam. This action took place before the formal filing of his nomination papers.

https://twitter.com/Muthuhere3/status/1772928107965448550

Another unexpected visit came as Thirumavalavan kickstarted his election campaign in Kallakurichi. Amidst the hustle and bustle of political campaigning, Thirumavalavan, accompanied by Minister for Transport S.S. Sivasankar, took a moment to seek blessings at the temple. Not only did he offer his respects, but he also partook in the sacred rituals, receiving prasad (religious offering) and even the sacred ash, thiruneeru, from a Brahmin priest.

The image of Thirumavalavan being blessed with thiruneeru by the Brahmin priest quickly went viral. This unexpected move by the VCK chief, known for his anti-Hindu stance, was seen as a calculated attempt to appeal to the Hindu electorate, especially in light of the alliance between VCK and the DMK.

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“Al Umma Exploited Youngsters, Rousing Fanaticism And Planted Bombs”: What Justice Gokulakrishnan Committee Revealed About Coimbatore Blasts Masterminded By SA Basha Whom Seeman And Thirumavalavan Glorified

By
The Commune
-
Al Umma Exploited Youngsters, Rousing Fanaticism And Planted Bombs: What Justice Gokulakrishnan Committee Revealed About Coimbatore Blasts Masterminded By SA Basha Whom Seeman And Thirumavalavan Glorified

A Tamil Nadu court has condemned recent remarks by political leaders, including VCK chief Thirumavalavan and NTK leader Seeman, who referred to SA Basha, the mastermind behind the deadly 1998 Coimbatore bomb blasts, as a “martyr” and a “father figure.” These comments drew widespread criticism against the leaders for glorifying a known terrorist and undermining the victims of the attacks. The court highlighted the dangers of such rhetoric that sets a dangerous precedent for minority appeasement while disregarding the fact that Basha caused the death of 58 people and injuries to over 230 people.

Political leaders in Tamil Nadu, such as Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi (VCK) chief Thirumavalavan and Naam Tamilar Katchi (NTK) chief Seeman, have faced severe criticism for their remarks following the recent death of SA Basha, the Islamist terrorist and founder of Al Ummah. Basha, whose name became synonymous with terrorism in Tamil Nadu during the 1980s and 1990s, was described by these leaders as a “martyr for a cause” and likened to a father figure. Such statements have been widely condemned as alarming and irresponsible, with critics arguing that glorifying a known terrorist sets a dangerous precedent. Many have labeled this as an act of minority appeasement that has crossed all acceptable limits.

The wounds from the devastating 1998 Coimbatore bomb blasts, orchestrated by Basha’s Islamist fundamentalist organization Al Ummah, remain fresh in the minds of the victims and their families. The coordinated attacks resulted in the tragic deaths of 58 people and left 231 others injured. Al Ummah was known for brainwashing young individuals into committing such heinous acts, leaving a trail of destruction and sorrow.

In the aftermath of the Coimbatore blasts, the Tamil Nadu government appointed Justice P.R. Gokulakrishnan, a retired judge of the Gujarat High Court, to lead an inquiry into the events that led to the bombings, the subsequent disturbances in law and order, and the damages caused to both public and private properties. The inquiry highlighted the magnitude of the atrocities and the long-lasting impact they have had on the affected communities.

A 2007 report by the “Working Group of the National Integration Council“, established to examine the findings of various Commissions of Inquiry on Communal Riots, was published under the Ministry of Home Affairs.

The report from the Working Group details instances of communal violence and the role of extremist groups like Al-Umma in escalating tensions. It highlights several key incidents:

  • In 1991, a Hindu activist was murdered by a Muslim individual.
  • In 1994, an elderly Muslim social worker was killed by another Muslim for criticizing Al-Umma’s extremist activities.
  • In 1995, a Hindu activist murdered a bakery owner as retaliation for a bomb blast at a Hindu Munnani office in Chennai.
  • In 1997, six murders occurred as communal violence flared after the killing of Palani Baba.

The report also documents Al-Umma’s involvement in violence following the Babri Masjid demolition in 1992. Police raids uncovered weapons and pamphlets outlining Al-Umma’s objectives, which included:

  • Uniting Muslims under a single forum to respond violently to perceived insults to Islam.
  • Destroying Hindu temples on the Babri Masjid demolition anniversary.
  • Targeting Hindus and Hindu activists to spread fear and disrupt communal harmony.

The causes of the Coimbatore bomb blasts on 14 February 1998, are attributed to actions by Muslim fundamentalist groups, particularly Al-Umma. The group exploited young individuals by inciting fanaticism through instructions and graphic images or videos of Muslims killed during police actions. The bombings were carried out as a retaliatory response to:

  • The killing of Muslims in police firings on 30 November, 1 December, and 2 December 1997.
  • Significant property losses suffered by the Muslim community during riots following the murder of Police Constable Thiru Selvaraj.

These events collectively culminated in the devastating bomb blasts, which claimed over 50 lives, caused significant property damage, and led to widespread law and order disturbances in Coimbatore and surrounding areas.

Excerpts From the Report

Raw excerpts from the report highlights, “In the year, 1991 an activist of Hindu front was murdered by Muslim. In 1994, one elderly Muslim and a social worker was murdered by one Muslim for the reason that he criticized the fanatical activities of Al-Umma. In 1995, one bakery owner was murdered by Hindu activist as sequel to the bomb blast in Hindu Mannani Office at Chennai. Subsequently, in the year 1997, six murders had occurred due to communal violence as a sequel to the murder of Palani Baba. Apart from the above said murders which were due to communal reasons, it is on record that the officials of Al-Umma had indulged in violence in the aftermath of demolition of Babri Masjid on 6th December 1992. The police raids had resulted in recovering arsenal and also pamphlets showing the objectives of Al Umma. The objective of these pamphlets was to unite all Muslims under the forum to react violently whenever Islam is humiliated, to destroy Hindu temples during the first anniversary of Babri Masjid demolition and to kill Hindus and Hindu fanatics and to create terror amongst Hindus thereby adversely thronging haywire, communal harmony.”

Causes For 1998 Coimbatore Bomb Blast

The report highlighted, “The Muslim fundamentalist groups, more especially the members belonging to Al Umma made use of the youngsters by rousing their fanaticism through their instructions and by exhibiting the photographs and video tapes showing the gruesome pictures of the dead bodies of the Muslims who were killed in the police firing, conspired and planted bombs on 14th February, 1998 as a retaliatory action for the killing of Muslims in Police firing on 30th November and Ist and 2nd December, 1997 and also for the huge loss of property the Muslim community suffered in the riot that occurred subsequent to the murder of Police Constable Thiru Selvaraj. These are all the causes and circumstances leading to the bomb blasts in Coimbatore City and its suburbs on the on the 14th February, 1998, resulting in the death of more than 50 persons and subsequent law and order disturbances including damages caused to the public and private properties.”

Who Was SA Basha?

S.A. Basha, the mastermind behind the 1998 Coimbatore serial bomb blasts, who founded the extremist organization Al-Umma, was responsible for planning the devastating blasts that killed 58 people and injured 231 others.

The Coimbatore serial bomb blasts of 1998 (DMK was in power in then) were a grievous incident in which 58 people were killed and over 200 individuals sustained serious injuries. This devastating series of 12 bomb attacks unfolded across 11 different locations within a 12-kilometer radius. Many of the survivors continue to grapple with the long-lasting effects of the shrapnel and other injuries caused by the devastating explosions.

The chief orchestrator behind these tragic events was identified as S A Basha, the founder of Al Ummah, an Islamic fundamentalist group. Investigations revealed that these bombings were part of a larger conspiracy with the sinister aim of targeting L.K. Advani, the leader of the Bharatiya Janata Party, during his election meeting scheduled for 4 p.m. on that ill-fated day. Fortunately, Advani’s flight was delayed, and he narrowly escaped the horrors of that day.

It is noteworthy to mention that one of the suspects, Mohammed Dhalka, who was detained in connection to the 2022 Coimbatore car blast terror incident is the nephew of SA Basha. Nawab Khan, Basha’s brother, was also sentenced to one-life term and 27 years of rigorous imprisonment in the 1998 bomb blast case.

The president of the banned fundamentalist outfit Al-Umma, SA Basha, openly threatened to kill the then Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi if he visited Coimbatore in July 2003. This threat was made by Basha and eight others while speaking to journalists in the Coimbatore court premises after their conviction and life imprisonment in a case related to the murder of a Hindu Munnani leader. It is noteworthy that Al-Umma and its leader were allowed to operate openly by the DMK Government until the Coimbatore blasts on 14 February 1998.

Magazines like Outlook and Frontline also acknowledged the role of the Tamil Nadu Muslim Munnetra Kazhagam (TNMMK) in these blasts. In March 1998, Frontline reported, “Within hours of the blasts, the Tamil Nadu Government banned Al-Umma and the Jihad Committee. Al-Umma founder-president S.A. Basha and 12 other members of the organization were arrested in Chennai; explosive materials and weapons were seized from his house in Triplicane, Chennai.”

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

How Then-HRD Min Kapil Sibal Apologised For Offensive Cartoon On Ambedkar In School Textbooks

By
The Commune
-
How Then-HRD Min Kapil Sibal Apologised For Offensive Cartoon On Ambedkar In School Textbooks

In 2012, following a controversy over a cartoon depicting Dr BR Ambedkar being chased by Jawaharlal Nehru in NCERT textbooks, HRD Minister Kapil Sibal apologized and ordered its removal. The cartoon, created in the 1960s by cartoonist Shankar, sparked outrage in Parliament, particularly from opposition leaders like Thol Thirumavalavan, who demanded accountability for its inclusion. Despite Sibal’s apology, the issue fueled protests, with calls for a deeper investigation into the matter.

For all the uproar that the Congress has been trying to create in Parliament using the edited video of Union Home Minister Amit Shah over his remarks on Dr BR Ambedkar, here is a piece of history surrounding the controversial cartoon featuring Ambedkar and Nehru that made its way into textbooks. After the issue was raised in Parliament, Kapil Sibal, who was the HRD Minister, apologised for the inclusion of the cartoon. Here’s what happened.

In May 2012, a controversy erupted in both houses of Parliament on Friday over a cartoon of Dalit icon B.R. Ambedkar featured in a National Centre for Educational Research and Training (NCERT) textbook. The cartoon, which depicted Ambedkar being chased by Jawaharlal Nehru with a whip, sparked outrage, leading the government to apologize and order its removal from textbooks.


The then-Human Resource Development Minister Kapil Sibal responded to the uproar, expressing regret over the matter and assuring that the “objectionable” content would be removed from future editions of the Class 11 political science textbooks. While Sibal emphasized that he was not personally responsible for the inclusion of the cartoon, he had “no hesitation in apologizing to the nation” for the controversy. He also confirmed that a committee had been set up to review all similar content in textbooks, with all such materials slated for removal in the next academic year.

The cartoon, originally published by renowned cartoonist Shankar in the 1960s, portrays Nehru urging Ambedkar to speed up the drafting of the Constitution. The depiction was seen by critics as insulting to Ambedkar, Nehru, and the nation as a whole.

Interestingly, the matter was raised in Parliament by VCK chief Thol Thirumavalavan, who, backed by lawmakers from various parties, demanded accountability for the inclusion of the cartoon. This led to multiple disruptions in both the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha, with protests intensifying in the Rajya Sabha when Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) members expressed their outrage, calling the cartoon an “intolerable insult” to their icon.

BSP members, along with other opposition leaders, insisted that the cartoon had no place in educational materials, with some even demanding immediate action rather than the minister’s assurance of future removal. Outside the Parliament, opposition leaders expressed their dismay over the cartoon’s prolonged inclusion in the NCERT textbooks, with Communist Party of India member D. Raja highlighting that it had been published since 2006 without being flagged.

The government’s apology, however, failed to calm all factions, as leaders like BSP supremo Mayawati and Rashtriya Janata Dal’s Ram Kripal Yadav called for a thorough investigation into the matter and swift action against those responsible for its inclusion.

(With inputs from India Today)

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

1...635636637...1,863Page 636 of 1,863
TheCommune
The Commune is a news and views portal focusing on social and political issues of the southern part of India with a focus on Tamil Nadu.
Contact us: thecommune.news@gmail.com
Facebook Instagram X Youtube

NATIONAL NEWS

The Timothy Initiative Exposed: Christian Missionary Org Which Routed ₹95 Crore Into Naxal-Affected Regions, Has Manuals Detailing Step-By-Step Conversion Strategy In Hindu Villages

How ‘The Timothy Initiative’ Which Routed ₹95 Crore Into Naxal-Affected Regions...

The Commune - 0
The Enforcement Directorate (ED) carried out searches on 18 and 19 April 2026 at multiple premises linked to the Christian missionary organisation The Timothy...
© The Commune 2025. All Rights Reserved.