Home Blog Page 635

‘Seven Attacks Were Planned’: BJP TN Chief Annamalai Reveals New Details In 2022 CBE Bomb Blast Case, Condemns DMK’s Handling Of Blast And Granting Permission For Terrorist Basha’s Funeral At “Black Day Rally”

'Seven Attacks Were Planned': BJP TN Chief Annamalai Reveals New Details In 2022 CBE Bomb Blast Case, Condemns DMK's Handling Of Blast And Granting Permission For Terrorist Basha's Funeral At "Black Day Rally"

Tamil Nadu BJP President Annamalai has exposed shocking details about the Coimbatore blast and the DMK government’s alleged attempts to downplay the incident, accusing Chief Minister MK Stalin of prioritizing political narratives over public safety. Speaking at the BJP’s “Black Day Rally” on December 20, 2024, Annamalai revealed for the first time the complete sequence of events leading up to the 2022 car bomb attack, including the terrorist’s intended targets and the chilling oath-taking ceremony held in the Sathyamangalam forest by the perpetrators.

Annamalai’s speech detailed how the DMK government dismissed the attack as a “cylinder blast,” ignoring National Investigation Agency (NIA) findings that confirmed it was an ISIS-inspired human bomb plot targeting civilians and police infrastructure. Addressing a crowd of over 2,500 participants near the Gandhipuram bus stand, Annamalai accused the ruling party of willful negligence, presenting damning evidence that underscored a deeply compromised state of law and order.

BJP holds “Black Rally Day” Against DMK Appeasement

Annamalai has strongly criticized the ruling DMK government for granting permission for the funeral procession of Islamic terrorist and Coimbatore blast convict SA Basha, without any reservations. At the “Black Day Rally,” Annamalai criticised the government’s decision, accusing it of appeasing the Muslim groups. Along with him, BJP state treasurer S R Shekhar, the Hindu Munnani state president Kadeshwara Subramanian, and several leaders from Hindu groups also participated in the rally.

Over 2,500 participants attended the rally, held near Gandhipuram bus stand, raising slogans condemning the DMK government.

TN BJP chief Annamalai began his speech at the public rally by directly targeting CM Stalin. He criticized the government for its response to the 2022 car bomb blast, pointing out that despite the NIA officially declaring it as a terrorist attack, the state government continued to label it a “cylinder blast,” allegedly to shield the terrorist in an act of appeasement.

Annamalai began his speech by directly addressing Chief Minister MK Stalin, stating, “On 23 October 2022, in Kottai Sangameswarar temple, a terrorist became a human bomb. I will reveal everything, what the NIA charge sheeted. I will tell you today for the first time who the target was, what he said in a recorded video, and who he came to kill. I stand here today to directly address the Chief Minister through the media and speak about what has not been said until now. On 23 October 2022, he drove a car with the intention of becoming a human bomb and parking it in front of a crowded textile shop in Coimbatore city. His goal was for the blast to collapse a pillar. When he was coming with this motive, he passed by the temple, he runs over a speed breaker, caused the gas cylinders circuit malfunction and the vehicle stops. He got out to inspect and try to push it, and the bomb explodes, killing him. While all BJP leaders, cadres, members of the Sangh, and senior leaders labeled it as a ‘human bomb attack,’ but what did the Chief Minister say? this is a ‘cylinder blast.’ This is how a Chief Minister rudely responds, citizens’ lives are threatened, and this is the example how the state of law and order in Tamil Nadu is.”

Annamalai then explained the aftermath of the incident and revealed further details of the terrorist’s plans. He shocked the crowd by stating that the terrorists had been planning this for a long time, and their intended target included even the police Commissionerate. “We don’t know what happened afterward, but I am here to tell you that,” He added.

Annamalai explained, “Where were they planning this operation? On 7 February 2022, eight people gathered under the leadership of Umar Farooq, in the Sathyamangalam forest, among them Mubin is one. The eight members together took an oath, declaring Umar Farooq as the ‘Amir’ of the Sathyamangalam forest, and they claimed the Sathyamangalam forest freed from the ‘Fakirs’ (Hindus) and was now their area. On 7 February 2022, Umar Farooq decided the actions of the seven members in the group and the attack took place on 23 October 2022. Police should listen to this carefully, as you are quick to arrest a BJP cadre for protest, like a dog being chased on the road. On 7 February 2022, eight members made their plans. Umar Farooq assigned Mubin that, ‘The responsibility of this terrorist attack to be suicide attack is your responsibility, purchase necessary equipment’. By March, they purchased 750 kilograms of Ammonium Nitrate, which, when mixed with Sulphur/charcoal, becomes an explosive. The police should take note of this, because what did your DGP say in response to the BJP’s statements? He accused us of ‘making politics out of a cylinder blast.’ But Mubin’s second target was your own police commissioner office.”

He continued, “Mubin wrote down plans for seven attacks. Seven member, Seven attack. Mubin was the first, and the second person comes six days after that day. Add six days from 23 October—the same vehicle would be brought to the police commissioner’s office and explode. But what did the police say? ‘It was a cylinder blast.’ And the Chief Minister repeats this like a parrot.”

Annamalai stated that Islamic terrorist Mubin recorded a seven-minute video in which he pledged allegiance (“bay’ah”) to the ISIS caliphate, described methods for killing non-believers, and detailed how to murder a Fakir. He further criticized the state’s law and order situation, remarking that one terrorist was releasing seven videos over seven days while another was in hiding in Coonoor, yet the department claimed to be functioning effectively.

Subscribe to our TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram channels and get the best stories of the day delivered instantly.

Vetrimaaran’s Viduthalai 2: When Political Preaching Overshadows Storytelling

Vetrimaaran's Viduthalai 2: When Political Preaching Overshadows Storytelling

When a filmmaker like Vetrimaaran unveils a movie, expectations naturally skyrocket. His track record, starting from Polladhavan, has cemented him as a creator of masterful, gripping narratives. The story may be simple, but Vetri’s writing and screenplay make it extraordinary. With the high benchmark set by the first part of Viduthalai, audiences anticipated another cinematic triumph in its sequel. While the film delivers in parts, it falters in parts due to its attempt to preach political ideologies.

A Tale Of Two Perspectives

In Viduthalai Part 1, the story is told from Kumaresan’s perspective. His journey grips the audience, evoking empathy and emotional investment. The sequel shifts gears, focusing on Vaathiyar’s backstory, which begins with promise. Ken Karunas’s episode is a standout moment skillfully executed. However, the narrative soon meanders, overwhelmed by an overreliance on dialogue and heavy-handed political discourse. While these elements reflect Vetrimaaran’s penchant for bringing politics into his films, they come at the cost of emotional depth and character connection.

Furthermore, the narrative glosses over the nuanced historical and ideological distinctions between the Dravidian and communist movements, offering an oversimplified portrayal. Red shirts and Black Shirts are hailed as saviours, and the Dravidian movement’s negative effects, such as high political corruption, are given a free pass. Just to establish that Perumal is a rebel, there are scenes after scenes and dialogues after dialogues to drive home this point.

Vaathiyar’s transformation into a revered figure lacks the emotional punch needed to make it impactful. This disconnect hampers the audience’s ability to fully immerse themselves in his journey. The interval sequence, which could have been a high point, feels underwhelming due to the lack of narrative weight and a poorly matched background score.

The film regains momentum in the second half, returning to Soori’s perspective and delivering more compelling scenes. These moments bring some much-needed emotional gravitas and narrative closure, albeit not without leaving some threads untied. Notably, the fate of Thamizharasi, whose beautifully depicted romance in the first part was a highlight, is frustratingly sidelined in the sequel. This oversight feels like a missed opportunity to tie up one of the most resonant aspects of the story.

As expected, Vetrimaaran’s craftsmanship shines through in the technical aspects. The cinematography and set design immerse viewers in the film’s world, but the makeup and hairstyling fall short, at times feeling amateurish. Ilayaraja’s music is a mixed bag; while the songs are commendable, the background score struggles to align with the film’s tone, particularly during pivotal moments like the interval block.

The performances remain the film’s strongest asset. Vijay Sethupathi and Soori deliver nuanced portrayals, while Chetan, as in the first part, steals every scene he’s in, earning the title of MVP. Ken Karunas, despite limited screen time, leaves a lasting impression. Additionally, a surprise cameo from a familiar face in Tamil Nadu’s digital media landscape with an army background adds an intriguing layer to the film.

Verdict

While Viduthalai 2 has moments of brilliance and compelling performances, it often veers off course, prioritizing long-winded political ideology over meaningful storytelling. The result is a film that feels more like a lecture than an engaging narrative, leaving the audience disconnected and yearning for the emotional depth and tight focus of its predecessor. It falls short of the greatness typically associated with Vetrimaaran’s work. The film’s ideological heaviness takes a toll on the film and pulls it down weighed down further by excessive exposition and unfinished arcs. It’s a worthwhile watch, but not Vetrimaaran’s finest.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Book Review: Saakshi By SL Bhyrappa – Timeless Wisdom In Modern Context

Book Review: Saakshi By SL Bhyrappa - Timeless Wisdom In Modern Context

S L Bhyrappa is one of the doyens in Kannada literature whose works have found wide acclaim across a spectrum of people. His books are based on socially relevant topics with a subtle undercurrent of age-old philosophical wisdom baked into the narrative. Saakshi was initially released in Kannada in 1986, while the English translation was released in 2017. While the story of this book is set in rural Karnataka in the 1950s-60s, it is not surprising that the same is relevant today in the modern context.

In this review, I aim to delve into the metaphorical analysis of the novel and its characters and their pertinence in the modern-day context.

The story revolves around the family of Parameshwarayya of Bilikere and a certain event that triggers multiple events impacting all the stakeholders. Bhyrappa starts the book with a multi-perspective analysis of the event and its implications. The reader is masterfully transported to the individual lives of the various characters, as well as their trials and tribulations. At the same time, the story is quite complex, with multiple sub-plots and unexpected twists and turns culminating in a soul-searching question. However, when one steps back and introspects, we can decipher the thin yet strong undercurrent of Vedantic wisdom encompassing the complete narrative and the author’s brilliant attempt at communicating these nuggets through his characters’ words, actions, and thoughts.

This book encompasses the Chaturvida Purusharthas (Dharma, Artha, Kama, Moksha) as one of the arcs, while the play of shadripus (6 evils) in the daily lives of the characters provides the base on which the story is constructed. Kama, as lust/carnal desire, is a very strong character of the book. In the book, Bhyrappa provides very deep insights into the functioning of the human mind, its deep impact due to overpowering lust, and its life-altering consequences.

Parameshwarayya, who commits suicide for uttering a lie, becomes a preta and presents his case in the court of Yamadharma. Parameshwarayya represents the true manifestation of Dharma, wherein he upholds the age-old practices of his home. A person who confines himself to the cause performs true nishkama karma, i.e., action without attaching fruits to it. Parameshwarayya does have a lapse in his character when he uncharacteristically hits his daughter Savitri and the reader is left confounded by his extreme reaction. However, the final twist in the tale reveals the true reason for this extreme reaction. Despite being focused on the path of Dharma, fatherly instincts provoke him to break the fundamental laws of Dharma. Yamadharma bestows a unique boon to his preta, to be a non-judgemental and non-influential witness i.e. Saakshi to the individual experiences of the characters. In a way, the author is highlighting the fact that we need to be an impartial witness to our surroundings and understand the intricacies of life. There are multitudes of factors impacting every single event and one needs to disassociate themselves from being the centre of attention to every single event.

Ramakrishna, son of Parameshwarayya, comes across as a true successor to his father, in terms of upholding Dharma and taking the meaning of Nishakama Karma to a different plane. As a human, one of his limitations is his extreme Krodha (Anger – one of the shadripus), a fact that is reiterated multiple times across the book. However, beyond a point, he takes solace in the spirituality books, a timely reminder to the readers to consider this path as part of their lives. Ramakrishna embodies the true teachings of Gita, wherein he performs his actions, whether he likes it or not, but stays within the boundaries of Dharma. Irrespective of the treatment meted out by his own father-in-law, Nagappa who is an embodiment of Lobha (Greed), he performs his duties without any repulsion or abhorrence. While his wife Sukanya and son Ganesha are motivated towards the material benefits of life, while ignoring to perform a true self-introspection, Ramakrishna comes across as a very balanced individual maintaining his composure and his resolve to stick to Dharma. Near the conclusion, when a major earth-shattering twist is revealed about Manjayya, irrespective of his inner turmoil and perhaps the exploding anger, Ramakrishna’s resolve to perform his duties despite the revelations is truly inspirational. In a way, the author reminds the readers that life is filled with unexpected challenges, but one can still choose to be a person like Ramakrishna.

Satyappa, the son-in-law of Parameshwarayya, is a very interesting character with a very wide arc of transformation and realization. Being a Gandhian, following the teachings of Mahatma, he tries to uplift the lives of the underprivileged in his own way. Relevant social messages like Cooperation, Dairy Farming, and Sericulture are embedded into the narrative to provide a perspective of what can truly be achieved. Satyappa also realizes his limitations in influencing a wider community and realigns his goals to be more apt for his circle of influence.  However, the true relevance of Satyappa lies in his inner journey and massive transformation in his character arc. A true follower of Gandhian principles, he does succumb to his subdued lust (owing to the premature death of his beloved wife) and makes a cardinal mistake. From the inner turmoil leading to an easy path of suicide to transcending that thought, embracing reality and taking a bold step to accept and make amends is truly inspirational. He represents the human of what he can become once the realization dawns upon oneself. Beyond the Gandhian that he is, he does come across as a realist in his relationship with his sister-in-law Savitri.

Savitri, the daughter of Parameshwarayya, is truly an inspirational character in the book. As a young unbridled carefree soul, she is highly opinionated and adamant on her choice of spouse. She is so blinded by Kama (Lust) that she is unable to decipher the uncharacteristic behaviour of her father. However, when realization dawns upon her, she transforms into a very strong woman who takes charge of her life. Unwilling to be a simple victim of circumstances, she starts to lead a life of her own while ensuring that she maintains her relationships and honours all her commitments towards them. Seventeen years later, when she becomes a victim of marital rape (yes, the author has brilliantly woven this concept), she undergoes a string of trials and tribulations within her own mind. Finally, she makes a series of bold decisions, some unconventional and quite contrary to modern societal concepts. If there was a character who represented Women’s Liberation, Savitri would truly be one.

Manjayya, son-in-law of Parameshwarayya and husband of Savitri, is the key central character of the book. He represents the true embodiment of uncontrolled Kama (Lust) who weaponizes the Kama and uses his charm to seduce almost every woman he comes across. He has no moral compass (until very late in the book) that allows him to lead a carefree life of his own choice. Manjayya’s actions touch the life of every character in the book irreversibly and form the crux of the narrative. Filled with Mada (arrogance) and driven by Lobha (Greed), Manjayya embodies the true manifestation of the shadripus with Kama being his weapon. However, from a metaphorical sense, Manjayya represents the Maya or the veil of the world. Manj-u in Kannada translates to Fog, a false screen that hides the reality or truth behind it. If we are enamoured by the fog and don’t strive to pursue the truth of Dharma, our own downfall is certain. The revelations at the end of the book could be repulsive, but indicative of the results for following the path of Adharma.

Lakkoo is another character, driven by lust lands up bearing the consequences of her actions (karma) in the most unfortunate manner. Her character is a timely reminder that we are responsible for our actions & results which could boomerang in the most unexpected and unfortunate manner.

Beyond these central characters, two other characters deserve a mention. Sarojakshi is another independent self-willed woman, who doesn’t shy to break the age-old norms and has a distinct personality of her own. However, her transformation from an angry wife to a submissive woman was quite unexplainable. Perhaps, she too is reflective of the scenario where Kama becomes overbearing and overpowering emotion, that subdues and masks the realities of life. Dr. Hasheem is another character who personifies Nishkama Karma, devoted to his profession despite the insults, yet has a compassionate heart and individuality that he asserts at the right time.

This book by Bhyrappa is replete with very philosophical tenets embedded in the interaction between its characters. One could consider this as a simple story, a commentary on society, or a true journey into the internal soul. We are the true Saakshi (witness) to our own self. A masterful philosophical treatise masterfully narrated by Bhyrappa, a gifted writer. A very highly recommended read.

Gee Vee is an engineer and avid fan of itihasas, puranas and books.

Subscribe to our TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram channels and get the best stories of the day delivered instantly.

Five-time Haryana CM Om Prakash Chautala Who Cleared Class 10, 12 Exams At 87

Five-time Haryana CM Om Prakash Chautala Who Cleared Class 10, 12 Exams At 87

Indian National Lok Dal (INLD) president and five-time Haryana Chief Minister Om Prakash Chautala, whose family ruled the state’s dusty and defection-ridden politics for decades largely in rural areas with predominant Jat voters, died in Gurugram after a cardiac arrest on Friday.

He was 89 and cleared his Class 10 and 12 exams two years ago. He suffered cardiac arrest at his home and was rushed to Medanta Hospital but passed away. Family said Chautala would be cremated at Teja Khera in Sirsa district on Saturday afternoon. His body would be kept there from 8 a.m. to 2 p.m. for people to pay respects.

Expressing grief, Prime Minister Narendra Modi wrote on X, “I am deeply saddened by the demise of former Haryana Chief Minister Om Prakash Chautala ji. He was active in state politics for many years and strove constantly to carry forward the work of (Chaudhary) Devi Lal.” Former Deputy Prime Minister Chaudhary Devi Lal was Om Prakash Chautala’s father. Condoling Chautala’s death, Haryana Chief Minister Nayab Singh Saini said, “His contribution to the state politics will always be remembered.” INLD spokesperson Rakesh Sihag said the former chief minister was feeling unwell in the morning. “However, a cardiac arrest took his life,” he added.

Om Prakash Chautala’s wife Sneh Lata died in August 2019. Chautala has three daughters and two sons, Abhay Singh Chautala and Ajay Singh Chautala. Abhay, a former MLA from Ellenabad, was the Leader of Opposition in the state Legislative Assembly from October 2014 till March 2019. The Chaudhary Devi Lal clan has ruled the state seven times, with Devi Lal being the Chief Minister twice and his son Om Prakash Chautala five times since December 1989.

From March 2000 to March 2005 was the longest term of Om Prakash Chautala. After that, the party emerged as the principal opposition party in 2014 polls with 19 legislators.

In the previous Assembly, the party had a lone legislator, Abhay Chautala, who lost the polls in 2024. The political landscape of the state dominated significantly by the Jat community witnessed a drastic change in the last one decade, ever since the BJP came to power in 2014, and continued its winning streak in 2024.

After the feud within the INLD, five-time Chief Minister Om Parkash Chautala’s grandson Dushyant split the party vertically in 2018 and formed the JJP.

The INLD and its breakaway faction Jannayak Janta Party (JJP), which played the kingmaker in the 2019 Assembly poll, were decimated in the October Assembly polls. Jats, who constitute about 27 per cent of the electorate and once the traditional vote base of the state’s regional parties, seemed to have made a sway — a shift that proved detrimental both for the INLD and the JJP.

While the results came as a massive setback for Om Prakash Chautala’s grandson Dushyant Chautala, the youngest scion Arjun Chautala, however, managed to defeat Independent candidate and sitting legislator Ranjit Chautala — an outcome from which the party might hope that all is not lost yet. Ranjit Chautala, who was the Cabinet minister in the previous BJP government in the state, is Om Prakash Chautala’s brother.

Both patriarch-dominated regional parties lost their grip, concentrated largely in rural areas, with their top leaders Abhay Singh Chautala of the INLD and his nephew Duhsyant Chautala of the JJP biting the dust.

Interestingly, the JJP, which was at the helm with the outgoing BJP government led by Union Minister Manohar Lal Khattar for four and a half years, had struggled to secure any seat or build a significant vote base across Haryana, marking a tough setback.

In the Assembly elections, the INLD partnered with the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP), while its breakaway faction JJP had an alliance with the Azad Samaj Party (Kanshi Ram). A special Central Bureau of Investigation court in Delhi on January 22, 2013, had sentenced the Chautalas, including Om Prakash, and eight others to 10 years in jail after finding them guilty of illegally recruiting 3,206 junior basic trained teachers in 2000. He was released from Tihar jail in July 2021.

Om Prakash Chautala cleared his Class 10 and 12 exams at the age of 87. He received his mark sheets from the Haryana board. In 2021, Chautala had appeared for Class 12 exams under the Haryana Open Board.

However, his result was withheld because he had not yet passed a Class 10 English exam. In order to get his Class 12 result released, he appeared for the Class 10 exam.

He scored 88 marks out of 100 in the English paper in his Class 10 examination last year. Except for English, he had cleared his Class 10 exams from the National Institute of Open School in 2017 while serving a 10-year sentence in Delhi’s Tihar Jail in connection with the recruitment scam.

–IANS

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

AAP ‘Replaces’ Ambedkar’s Photo With Kejriwal’s In Constitution Visual

AAP 'Replaces' Ambedkar's Photo With Kejriwal's In Constitution Visual

Accusing the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) of insulting BR Ambedkar, BJP National Spokesperson Pradeep Bhandari on Friday said that the party replaced Babasaheb Ambedkar’s picture with that of Arvind Kejriwal in a popular visual depicting the Constitution and its creator.

“This is an insult to Baba Saheb Ambedkar. AAP replaces Baba Saheb Ambedkar’s picture with Arvind Kejriwal’s picture. AAP is anti-Constitution. AAP is Anti SC. AAP hates Baba Saheb Ambedkar,” said Bhandari in a message on social media handle X.

The poster or collage objected to by Bhandari shows Kejriwal in the foreground, virtually, superimposing the former Delhi chief minister’s photo on the Constitution.

The visual has been circulated on the official X handles of the AAP. While calling out Kejriwal for disrespecting B.R. Ambedkar, the BJP spokesman sought to expose the former Delhi Chief Minister’s double standards on the Dalit icon and his contribution to creating the Constitution.

Bhandari’s fresh attack on Kejriwal, purportedly to expose the AAP as an opportunist party looking to politically encash B.R. Ambedkar’s legacy, comes a day after Delhi’s ruling party held a protest. In response, the Delhi BJP’s SC and ST Morcha workers on Thursday staged protests at four locations seeking an apology from the Congress and others for disrespecting B.R. Ambedkar.

The BJP has also aggressively countered protests by the AAP and other Opposition parties over Home Minister Amit Shah’s remarks which were termed “disrespectful”. Earlier on Wednesday, HM Shah accused the Congress of twisting his remarks.

He said that last week, both Houses of Parliament, the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha, held a special discussion to commemorate the 75th anniversary of the Constitution. He said that this discussion highlighted the nation’s 75-year journey of pride, development, and achievements. While it is natural for leaders and speakers from the ruling and Opposition parties to have differing perspectives during such discussions in Parliament, the country’s highest forum should always be based on facts and truth, he said.

“However, the Congress has been distorting facts and attempting to misrepresent the truth, which is highly deplorable,” said HM Shah, strongly condemning this act.

HM Shah said that the Congress has distorted his statement in the Rajya Sabha. “Twisting statements, creating uproar, and spreading confusion in society have always been Congress’ old habits,” he said.

“Previously, the Congress also edited and misrepresented the statements of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. During the recent Lok Sabha elections, my statement was edited by Artificial Intelligence (AI) and maliciously misused for propaganda across the country — a vile act carried out by the Congress,” he said, addressing mediapersons.

–IANS

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“Sorry State Of Law And Order”: BJP TN Chief Annamalai Slams DMK Cadres Involvement In BJP Functionary Vittal Kumar’s Brutal Murder

"Sorry State Of Law And Order": BJP TN Chief Annamalai Slams DMK Cadres Involvement In BJP Functionary Vittal Kumar's Brutal Murder

Tamil Nadu BJP President K Annamalai sharply criticized the ruling DMK government, describing its administration as a “sorry state of law and order,” even as he specifically urged the government not to intervene in the murder case of BJP functionary Vittal Kumar, emphasizing that the perpetrators were affiliated with the ruling party. Annamalai demanded justice for the victim, pointing out that BJP protests over the past four days had led to the surrender of the accused in court.

On 20 December 2024, Annamalai took to his official X account to condemn the DMK, stating, “This is the sorry state of law & order in TN under the DMK Govt. BJP functionary Thiru Vittal avl was brutally murdered by DMK Panchayat Chairman Bala Sait on 16th Dec. After subsequent protests by Vellore Dist functionaries of @BJP4TamilNadu to arrest the criminals, today accomplices of Bala Sait have arrived in court to surrender for the crime after 4 days. We caution the DMK Govt to ensure that all the DMK functionaries involved in this murder be arrested & not work overtime in saving them. Below are those who have surrendered in court today.”

Vittal Kumar, a 42-year-old BJP district secretary of the party’s spiritual wing, hailed from the Nagal area near K.V. Kuppam in Vellore district. He was married to Revathi and had two children. On the evening of 16 December, after completing his usual school duties, Vittal dropped his wife Revathi off at home on his two-wheeler.

Later, Vittal was found unconscious with severe blood injuries near the Chennangkuppam bus stand. Upon receiving the information, the K.V. Kuppam police arrived at the scene, rushed him to Gudiyatham Government Hospital, and then transferred him to a private hospital in Melvisharam. Unfortunately, despite efforts, Vittal succumbed to his injuries. Initially, the police treated the incident as a suspicious death and launched an investigation. However, the case was later reclassified as a murder, and two individuals were arrested and are currently being interrogated in connection with the crime.

In response to the incident, Tamil Nadu BJP leader K. Annamalai has accused DMK-affiliated rowdies of being behind the brutal attack, claiming they were responsible for Vittal Kumar’s lynching.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“Don’t Take This Court For A Ride”: SC Issues Notice To TN Govt. On DMK Min Senthil Balaji’s Bail And Ministerial Appointment In Cash-For-Job Scam Case

supreme court senthil balaji dmk

On 20 December 2024, a bench of the Supreme Court, comprising Justice Abhay S Oka and Justice Augustine George Masih, issued a notice to the Tamil Nadu government, directing it to provide details regarding the pending cases against DMK Minister Senthil Balaji. The Court also sought information on the number of witnesses involved, differentiating between public servants and other victims.

This order was issued in response to a petition challenging the Court’s earlier decision that granted bail to Minister Senthil Balaji in a money laundering case connected to the alleged cash-for-jobs scam. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) argued that Balaji’s reappointment as a Cabinet Minister after his release had put undue pressure on the witnesses.

During the proceedings, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the ED, pointed out that although in jail, Balaji wielded considerable influence as a minister without a portfolio, highlighting his political power within the state. In contrast, Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, defending Balaji, countered by stating, “There are many individuals in any state who hold substantial power, even without a portfolio.”

Justice Oka raised concerns regarding the potential impact on victims, saying, “We need to know from the state how many victims are involved. If the number is large, then with him holding the cabinet minister position, what will happen to those victims?”

Senior Advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan added that most of the prosecution’s witnesses were public servants from the Tamil Nadu government, where Balaji holds multiple ministerial portfolios. He also referenced the case of Arvind Kejriwal, where strict bail conditions were imposed, including barring him from visiting the Chief Minister’s office and the Delhi Secretariat.

Justice Oka acknowledged the importance of both public servants and ordinary citizens as witnesses in the case, stating, “We have reviewed the details of the trials. Common people, from whom money was taken, are witnesses. Civil servants are also witnesses. We will issue a notice to the state to ascertain how many witnesses there are and who they are.

Both Sankaranarayanan and Solicitor General Mehta argued that Balaji’s bail had led to delays in the trial process, citing the absence of a key forensic witness, PW4, who failed to appear in court after Balaji’s release.

Justice Oka expressed frustration over the events of 2 December, when Senior Advocate Sidharth Luthra, representing Balaji, had requested the Court not issue a notice, stating he would take instructions. While the Court had initially shown interest in issuing a notice, due to Balaji’s ministerial appointment shortly after his bail, it ultimately refrained after Luthra’s assurance.

Justice Oka criticized this statement: “‘Don’t issue notice, I will take instructions’—what does that mean? Don’t take this court for a ride. We were about to issue a notice but changed our order based on that statement. We are concerned about this. After this counsel makes a statement, there is a change in counsel. We cannot forget what happened in court that day. What does ‘taking instructions’ mean from your experience?”

Sibal apologized, and Justice Oka remarked, “We will examine this matter, but we are left with the impression that someone has misled this court.”

Sankaranarayanan pointed out that Balaji’s bail was granted due to a change in circumstances, implying that the Court had initially believed Balaji to be a layman. However, Justice Oka dismissed this interpretation, stating, “We were not under that impression. Please do not attribute that to us. The reasons for granting bail are clearly outlined in our order.” He explained that the bail was granted primarily due to delays in the trial, and noted that other accused individuals in the PMLA case had been given similar relief.

Justice Oka further commented, “It can’t be assumed that just because a person is released and then becomes a Minister, there is something wrong. There are situations where someone might be falsely implicated. We need to examine the specific facts of this case.” The Court then scheduled the next hearing for 15 January 2025.

Case Background

On 26 September, the Supreme Court granted bail to DMK minister Senthil Balaji, acknowledging a prima facie case against him. The Court’s decision was based on Balaji’s extended detention since June 2023 and the unlikely prospect of the trial starting anytime soon. It also underscored the importance of the right to a speedy trial, particularly in cases involving special statutes with strict bail conditions.

On 29 September, Balaji was sworn in as a Cabinet Minister under Chief Minister MK Stalin, assuming responsibility for the Electricity, Non-Conventional Energy Development, and Prohibition & Excise portfolios.

On 2 December, the Supreme Court expressed its surprise at Balaji’s appointment to a ministerial position so soon after being granted bail. While the Court did not retract its bail decision, it confined its inquiry to whether Balaji’s role as a minister might influence witnesses in the ongoing case.

In an affidavit filed on 13 December, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) raised alarms about Balaji’s swift reappointment to the Cabinet within 48 hours of his release. The ED noted that Balaji had held a ministerial post without portfolio during his eight-month imprisonment and had only resigned just before his bail hearing at the High Court.

The ED expressed concerns that Balaji could exert undue influence over witnesses, many of whom had worked under him when he served as Transport Minister. The affidavit also pointed to delays in the trial, including the extended cross-examination of a key forensic witness, PW4, and accused Balaji of using adjournments, requests for cloned digital evidence, and changes in legal representation to slow down proceedings.

Additionally, the ED suggested that Balaji’s actions undermined the Supreme Court’s directive to expedite the trial, implying that he deliberately obstructed the legal process and disregarded the Court’s orders.

(With Inputs From Live Law)

Subscribe to our TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram channels and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Dravidian Model Leaves TN Higher Education Paralyzed: No VCs, No SEP, 4000 Faculty Posts Vacant

Dravidian Model Leaves TN Higher Education Paralyzed: No VCs, No SEP, 4000 Faculty Posts Vacant

Despite the annual rise in student enrollments across various engineering, vocational, arts, and science colleges, the Higher Education Department continues to face several challenges. Reports indicate that key tasks still remain unfinished, including the official implementation of the State Education Policy (SEP) with other ongoing issues include the appointment of vice-chancellors for six state-run universities, such as the University of Madras. In addition, the recruitment of approximately 4,000 assistant professors for arts and science colleges remains pending, despite a notification issued back in March.

The Ministry of Education, through the University Grants Commission (UGC) and the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE), has consistently pressured state universities to update their progress on the implementation of the National Education Policy (NEP), which was introduced in 2020. At one point, the UGC issued several directives threatening to freeze central funding for universities failing to adopt the NEP.

Currently, universities like the University of Madras, Madurai Kamaraj University, Anna University, Bharathiar University, Bharathidasan University, and several others serve thousands of students across a variety of disciplines. However, the freezing of the ₹570 crore allocation under the Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA) by the Centre has put these state-run institutions under pressure, placing them at the crossroads between the Higher Education Department and the UGC. In contrast, deemed universities face fewer challenges in adopting the NEP despite the state’s resistance.

Failure To Implement SEP Even After Three Years of Recommendations

In 2021, a proposal was made to establish an expert committee to develop a dedicated SEP. After overcoming numerous challenges, it took nearly three years for the committee to complete the SEP report. Although the Justice Murugesan Committee submitted the SEP to Chief Minister MK Stalin in July, its implementation in both school and higher education sectors is still pending. A senior official in the Higher Education Department, who wished to remain anonymous, explained that the SEP cannot be implemented immediately because feedback and suggestions from stakeholders are needed to finalize any amendments.

The official added that, as per established norms, the SEP cannot be rolled out mid-academic year and is expected to be officially implemented from the next academic year. Furthermore, the expert committee only submitted a draft of the policy.

PB Prince Gajendra Babu, general secretary of the State Platform for Common School System-TN, expressed that the SEP could be launched in the next academic year if the state government begins taking steps toward its implementation. He emphasized that the SEP would benefit both educational institutions and students. Babu also criticized the withholding of funds for the non-implementation of the NEP, stating that the Centre should respect the state’s interests.

Vacant Vice-Chancellor Positions Disrupting Key Universities In TN

Six key universities, including the University of Madras, Anna University, Madurai Kamaraj University, Bharathiar University, Tamil Nadu Teachers Education University, and Annamalai University, are currently functioning without permanent vice-chancellors. Meanwhile, the state government has extended the tenure of vice-chancellors at Periyar University and Bharathidasan University.

A senior official from the Higher Education Department, who also preferred to remain anonymous, confirmed that the state government is resolute in forming a search committee to appoint vice-chancellors. The official argued that including a UGC representative in the selection panel would create complications, as no rules exist to support such a move, which is why the state is firm on its position.

P Thirunavukkarasu, vice-chairman of the Association of University Teachers (AUT), called for an immediate resolution to the dispute between the Raj Bhavan and the state government over the vice-chancellor appointments. He argued that universities cannot function efficiently without vice-chancellors, as decisions must go through a lengthy approval process involving syndicate members. Convening syndicate meetings alone is a time-consuming process, followed by additional formalities before decisions can be made.

Thirunavukkarasu also warned that the continued delay in appointing assistant professors in arts and science colleges would significantly disrupt academic activities, causing stress and placing extra pressure on part-time faculty members.

Professor Arul Aram from Anna University and president of the Anna University Teachers Association echoed similar concerns, noting that the lack of vice-chancellors would hamper administrative functions and delay critical policy decisions, including staff appointments. He stressed that the absence of vice-chancellors would degrade the overall working conditions for faculty members.

(With inputs from DTNext)

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

List Of Terror Attacks By Al Ummah Terrorist SA Basha And His Associates, Whom Thirumavalavan Glorified And Seeman Referred To As His Father

Thirumavalavan And Seeman, Do You Have An Ounce Of Shame In Glorifying A Mass Murdering Terrorist?

After the death of SA Basha, the notorious Islamist terrorist and founder of Al Ummah, who was infamous for his violent role in terror attacks across Tamil Nadu during the 1980s and 1990s, Tamil Nadu political leaders have come under fire for describing him as a “martyr for a cause” and even comparing him to a father figure. These remarks are a blatant attempt to whitewash the destruction caused by Al Ummah and its leader, disregarding the immense suffering inflicted upon the state and its citizen. Such statements have crossed all reasonable limits, with critics accusing these leaders of engaging in extreme minority appeasement for the sake of vote-bank politics, without any sense of responsibility.

VCK chief Thol Thirumavalavan, in a post on his official X account, praised Basha, stating, “His family was imprisoned to protect the interests of Muslims, he did not lose heart and lived with determination, unwavering in his principles.” He went on to say, “His demise is a great loss for Muslims,” and paid a “heroic tribute,” saluting “Kovai Pasha.”

Meanwhile, NTK chief Seeman, while expressing his condolences, controversially referred to Basha as “father Basha,” describing his death as a “great tragedy.” Seeman’s praise was alarming to many, especially considering his description of the convicted terrorist as a father figure. His comments attempted to deflect attention from the serious crimes Basha and his organization were convicted for, including the murder of innocent people, while blaming the imprisonment of Muslim prisoners on political motives, ignoring the severity of their crimes. This rhetoric has sparked widespread concern, as it seems to ignore the tragic consequences of the violent actions committed by Al Ummah and its leaders.

But the wounds from the devastating 1998 Coimbatore bomb blasts, orchestrated by Basha’s Islamist fundamentalist organization Al Ummah, remain fresh in the minds of the victims and their families. The coordinated attacks resulted in the tragic deaths of 58 people and left 231 others injured. Al Ummah was known for brainwashing young individuals into committing such heinous acts, leaving a trail of destruction and sorrow.

It is deeply condemnable when politicians praise a terrorist as a martyr while disregarding the innocent lives lost in such tragic incidents. Below are the atrocities carefully orchestrated and carried out over two decades by these so-called “father figures” and “martyrs.”

  • 1982: Basha attacked a group of Hindu leaders returning from a meeting at Coimbatore.
  • 1984: On 18 July 1984, Basha attacked Rama Gopalan, a prominent Hindu leader of the Hindu Munnani.
  • 1989: On 30 August 1989, Veera Ganesh, a prominent Hindu Munnani functionary was killed.
  • 1991: On 5 September 1991, Veera Shiva, a Hindu Munnani functionary, was killed.
  • 1992: On 29 October 1992, Al-Ummah members arrested while smuggling explosives from Kerala.
  • 1993 (August): RDX blast at RSS state headquarters, killing 11 people.
  • 1994 (October): State president of Hindu Munnani, Rajagopalan, dragged out of his house and attacked.
  • 1995 (April): RDX blast at Hindu Munnani headquarters.
  • 1995 (July): Parcel bomb killed the wife of district president of Hindu Munnani.
  • 1997 (September): On 2 September 1997, Five Hindus killed in one day.
  • 1997 (November): Police constable Selvaraj publicly executed.
  • 1998 (February): On 14 February 1998, Coimbatore serial bombings killed 76 people (Operation Allahu Akbar).
  • 1998 (March): Prof. Paramasivam dragged out of his house and executed.
  • 2003 (May): On 2 May 2003, Marad massacre – Eight Hindu fishermen massacred.
  • 2006 (August): 18 SIMI members conducted indoctrination-Jihad camp.
  • 2006 (November): Two Pakistani terrorists arrested.
  • 2007 (January): On 1 January 2007, Two LeT terrorists arrested while fleeing to Chennai.
  • 2010 (July): Professor’s hand chopped off in a violent attack.
  • 2012 (July): Two Hindu students, Sachin Gopal (20) and Vishal Kumar (19), stabbed to death.
  • 2012 (November): On 6 November 2012, Anand, an RSS functionary, attacked.
  • 2013 (April): BJP leader attacked in the morning hours.
  • 2013 (July): On 1 July 2013, Vellaiappan, a Hindu Front functionary, killed.
  • 2013 (July): On 19 July 2013, Ramesh, an auditor and BJP state general secretary, killed with 23 cuts.

This timeline highlights the continued violence and intimidation carried out by members of Al-Ummah and associated groups, reflecting a dark period in Tamil Nadu’s history. Let these incidents serve as an eye-opener for these politicians, urging them to focus on any issue but never play politics with national security or compromise the lives of innocent citizens.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Thirumavalavan And Seeman, Do You Have An Ounce Of Shame In Glorifying A Mass Murdering Terrorist?

Thirumavalavan And Seeman, Do You Have An Ounce Of Shame In Glorifying A Mass Murdering Terrorist?

Tamil Nadu political leaders, including Thol Thirumavalavan and Seeman, have eulogized Kovai Basha, the notorious terrorist responsible for the 1998 Coimbatore bombings. Kovai Basha died of old age a couple of days back. Who was he? Was he someone who contributed to the society? Did he contribute to science? Education? What is his claim to fame?

He was a convicted terrorist who was jailed for killing innocent people in the name of religion. He was a bigot who misled a generation of his coreligionists to perpetrate terror on ideologies that he didn’t like. Let us quickly look at who he was and his road to notoriety. Basha was a firewood commission agent in Ukkadam, Coimbatore. He diversified into real estate broking and became a real estate businessman. The influence of Wahabi Islam increased in the late 1980s. Its initial epicentre was the old Madurai District (Madurai, Ramnad, Tirunelveli), which slowly diversified into Coimbatore. Basha soon became the ringleader in Coimbatore. One of his first acts of terror came in 1983 when he waylaid attacked the BJP leaders who were travelling in a car with a machete. Basha brutally attacked Jana Krishnamurthy, Thirukovilur Sundaram, T. R. Gopalan, and Narayan Rao.

In 1987, Basha brutally attacked Rama. Gopalan, the late leader of Hindu Munnani at Madurai Railway station. An attack so brutal that Gopalji was in a coma a month before his miraculous recovery process started. His skull was broken into pieces by this attack. It makes one wonder how such a heinous terrorist was let loose in the society. How could he escape the hands of justice and continue perpetrating terror?

Emboldened that the arms of law were keeping him at a distance, he threw open challenges. In 1989, he started issuing fatwas against opponents. He issued a fatwa against five Hindu activists, including Arjun Sampath and Veera Ganesh. Veera Ganesh was brutally murdered.

Basha’s terror activities were so blatant that he and his gang ransacked the office of the Coimbatore West, DMK MLA, C. T. Dhandapani. The reason – he met with Atal Bihari Vajpayee. Anyone he thought was not subscribing to his position was intimidated or silenced.

In 1993, there was a deadly RDX blast in the RSS office in Chennai. This resulted in eleven deaths and seven people gruesomely injured. The cause was Jihadi terror, and the terrorists were linked to Basha. The next was the gruesome murder of Kottai Ameer, a Muslim activist who was campaigning against Jihadi activities. And then came the murder of the young traffic constable Selvaraj in 1997. His fault was that he stopped a bike for triple riding and asked for their papers. Many of us might remember that the police department went on a strike protesting the killing of their colleague, which itself is very strange. Even after a police strike, the loss of 20 lives in the violence that followed, didn’t activate the long arm of justice to do something decisive against Basha.

Next came the 1998 Coimbatore serial bomb blasts. This act of terror was aimed at BJP leader L. K. Advani, who was visiting Coimbatore for some political meetings. Such was the evil mind of the Jihadi terrorists that they timed a bomb in the Government hospital targeting the victims and relatives of the blasts in other locations who would eventually be brought to the hospital. In six hours, there were twelve explosions across the city, killing 58 people and injuring more than 200.

After this gruesome Jihadi attack, Al Umma, the terror organisation that Basha headed, was banned. He and his associates were arrested and prosecuted. It wasn’t just Basha, but a few more from his family were arrested too. The Justice Gokulakrishnan Commission that was set up to probe the bomb blasts, indicted the government machinery for their lack of checks and surveillance and for not discharging their duties as expected. Many of us would remember that this is more or less the same thing that Tamil Nadu BJP chief Annamalai said about the recent “gas cylinder” blasts in Coimbatore in 2023: intelligence failure and lack of surveillance.

So, this is the Basha who has been eulogised by leaders of a party recognised by the election commission, Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi (VCK). The party supremo and an elected MP, Thol Thirumavalavan, went a step ahead and posted an eulogy, almost blaming the government for keeping Basha in jail. Another politician and the chief of the Naam Tamilar Katchi, Seeman, referred to Basha as his father and delivered his characteristic cinematic dialogues while paying tribute to this newfound father, a man who had been convicted of terrorist activities. The government of Tamil Nadu, on its part, even permitted a huge public procession to take the remains of Basha for burial.

The crowd seen during Basha’s final journey and in the meeting that happened before begs a critical question: What is the stance of the Muslim community on this? Do they see Basha as a role model for their children? The community that bravely came forward and issued a clarification during the recent 2023 Coimbatore bomb blasts against the Jihadi perpetrator Jameesha Mubin and subsequently denied him a burial in their graveyards needs to come out and clarify their stand about Basha and Al Umma. Otherwise, all their good work in 2023 would go waste and be seen as empty posturing.

The constituents of the Chidambaram parliamentary constituency need to ask their MP, Thol Thirumavalavan, about his stand on terrorism and terror activities. How can an MP who isn’t serious about terrorism that killed hundreds of innocent people protect the people of Chidambaram and ensure their welfare? The members and patrons of the Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi should also ask the party the same question.

Lastly, Seeman, whom Tamil Nadu sees as a comic relief for his antics about his relationship with ‘dead’ people, must be taken seriously. By calling a convicted terrorist “Appa”, he has not just shown his class but has also bared his fangs. Tamil Nadu needs to wake up to who he is and show him his place in the next elections.

Here is what the people of Tamil Nadu should know before continuing to support these regressive forces, such as Thol Thirumavalavan and Seeman, that support terror convicts. Your vote is a mighty weapon you yield.

இளைதாக முள்மரம் கொல்க களையுநர்
கைகொல்லும் காழ்த்த இடத்து (The Appraising of Enemies, 879)

“Fell down thorn-trees while yet they are young: for when they are over-grown they will themselves cut the hand that attempteth to fell them” – The Kural Or The Maxims Of Tiruvalluvar – V V S Aiyar

Raja Baradwaj is a marketing communications professional who works with a leading technology multinational company. He is an avid reader, history buff, cricket player, writer, and Sanskrit and Dharma Sastra student.

Subscribe to our TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram channels and get the best stories of the day delivered personally.