Home Blog Page 538

Udhayanidhi Stalin Took Akash Bhaskaran To Meet Senthil Balaji In Hospital

Former AIADMK minister D. Jayakumar has raised pointed questions about the involvement of film producer Akash Bhaskaran in the ongoing Enforcement Directorate (ED) probe linked to a ₹1,000 crore scam in Tamil Nadu’s TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation). His remarks come in the wake of ED raids on multiple premises, including liquor factories and the TASMAC head office.

The investigation intensified last March when ED officials raided TASMAC’s headquarters and several liquor production units, alleging large-scale financial irregularities amounting to ₹1,000 crore. In follow-up raids across Chennai, officials searched over 10 locations, including the home of TASMAC Managing Director Vishagan in Manapakkam, the SNJ distillery in Choolaimedu, and the residences of film producer Akash Bhaskaran in Teynampet and industrialist Devakumar in Triplicane.

Akash Bhaskaran, known for producing films like Idli Kadai featuring Dhanush and Parasakthi starring Sivakarthikeyan, was reportedly summoned by the ED for questioning but has yet to appear. His absence has fueled speculation, especially as several TASMAC officials have already responded to the agency’s inquiries.

In this backdrop, Former AIADMK minister Jayakumar took to social media platform X, posting a video and sharply criticizing the DMK government questioned the presence of Akash Bhaskaran during Deputy Chief Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin’s visit to Senthil Balaji at the hospital. Balaji had been admitted after reportedly experiencing chest pain following his arrest by the ED.

In the post, Jayakumar mocked the hospital visit saying, “Deputy Chief Minister Udhayanidhi went to witness the chest pain drama staged by ‘martyr’ Senthil Balaji during the Enforcement Directorate raid. Why did he take Akash Bhaskaran inside with him? What is the connection between “Ten Rupees Balaji” and the producer of Parasakthi? Why did Udhayanidhi personally seek out Akash Bhaskaran and take him into the hospital? It is now glaringly evident that DAWN PICTURES was operating using TASMAC revenue!

Further scrutiny has also fallen on Akash Bhaskaran’s personal connections. He is married to Dharani, the daughter of Thenmozhi (Karunanidhi’s granddaughter) and C.K. Ranganathan, the chairman of CavinKare. This family link, combined with Akash’s rising profile in the Tamil film industry, has intensified public and political curiosity about his role in the unfolding scandal.

As the ED probe continues and the opposition ramps up its criticism, pressure mounts on the DMK government to clarify the nature of these alleged connections and address the accusations of misuse of public funds.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Murshidabad Probe Finds Water Supply Cut Off Deliberately To Prevent Victims From Dousing Fires

In Murshidabad, West Bengal, violence targeting Hindus erupted during protests linked to the Waqf Amendment Bill. A fact-finding committee set up by the Calcutta High Court has released a damning report, implicating local leaders of the ruling Trinamool Congress (TMC), including municipal councilors and a sitting MLA. The report describes an orchestrated campaign of violence in which Hindu homes were set ablaze, water supplies were deliberately cut to prevent firefighting, and widespread looting and destruction occurred.

The unrest began around 2:30 PM on 11 April 2025, and continued into 12 April, affecting several areas including Betbona village, Dhuliyan, Palpara (Ward 16), Samserganj, Hijaltala, Shiulitala, Digri, and Ghoshpara. Betbona was the worst hit, with 113 homes rendered uninhabitable.

Water Supply Sabotaged to Prevent Firefighting Efforts

According to the report, attackers deliberately disabled access to water, ensuring that fires could not be extinguished once homes were set ablaze. Water pipelines were severed, tanks were smashed, and submersible pumps were destroyed, leaving residents defenseless as their homes went up in flames. Kerosene was used to ignite the fires, turning possessions into ashes. In many cases, even the clothing inside homes was burned, leaving women without anything to wear.

The investigation committee documented numerous victim testimonies that painted a disturbing picture of the targeted brutality. All of those affected were from the Hindu community and recounted how their homes were torched, valuables looted, and their families assaulted with lethal weapons.

  • Pratima Mandal (Betbona): Pratima reported finding a live bomb near her residence. She said that gold jewelry and furniture were stolen from her home. Other victims in the same attack included Manoj Roy, Akash Mandal, Bikash Mandal, Nikhil Mandal, Chitta Roy, Babul Mandal, Nibarun Mandal, Shampa Mandal, Bhabananda Ghosh, Basudeb Mandal, Ram Mandal, Arjun Mandal, and Latika Mandal.

  • Prasanta and Saraswati Mandal: The couple shared that their vehicles—including a Toto van, a motorcycle, a bicycle, and a tractor—were looted and then set ablaze.

  • Phoolchand and Palash Mandal: This family of three, including a small child, said their house was completely destroyed, rendering it unlivable. Phoolchand recounted how those trying to help his wife and child were attacked with knives. He sustained critical injuries to his neck and abdomen.

  • Parul Das: Parul described how assailants broke into his home, shattered windows, and hurled bottles and stones. His wife and son were abducted. The attackers had their faces covered to avoid being identified.

  • Hargovinda Das and Chandan Das: In what was one of the most gruesome incidents, 74-year-old Hargovinda and his 40-year-old son Chandan were killed with an axe by Muslim neighbors. Witnesses claimed that one of the attackers stood guard until both were dead. The murders, which took place on April 12, caused such fear that few people even attended the funerals.

  • Krishna Chanda Pal: Krishna stated that attackers looted ₹17 lakh worth of gold and furniture from his home. They broke in through the rear entrance and assaulted his family members.

  • Jai Ram Pal: He reported that both his pottery shop and cyber café were completely destroyed by fire.

  • Apurba K.R. Pal and Kripa Sindhu Pal: These victims said they lost a bicycle, a 32-inch television, and about ₹2 lakh during the violence.

  • Nabin Chanda Pal and Sankar Pal: Nabin said that ₹80,000 saved for his son’s wedding and two pieces of gold jewelry were stolen. His entire household was reduced to rubble.

Role of Local Leaders and Inaction by Police

The report states the violence was incited by local TMC councilor Mehboob Alam, who was present at the scene with masked attackers. Later, TMC MLA Amirul Islam arrived, pointed out untouched houses, and the mob torched them too. He made no attempt to stop the violence and left quietly.

Despite repeated calls for help, the local police remained inactive—this even though the affected area was only 300 meters from a police station. The inquiry committee labeled the police response a case of severe dereliction of duty.

Temples Attacked, Shops Looted

In Ghoshpara, 29 shops were damaged or looted. A commercial market was ransacked and shut down. Grocery stores, hardware shops, electronics retailers, and clothing outlets were destroyed, along with essential documents. Temples were desecrated—reports allege acts of urination in front of temples and that Hindus were forced to recite Islamic declarations under duress.

Post-Violence Conditions and Call for Justice

Following the attacks, Betbona village remains in ruins, with displaced women seeking refuge with relatives. Victims continue to live in fear, with little assistance from authorities. The inquiry committee—comprising members of the National Human Rights Commission, State Legal Services Authority, and the judiciary—submitted its findings to the Calcutta High Court’s division bench on 20 May 2025.

The report clearly concludes that the violence was a targeted, organized assault on the Hindu community, facilitated by local TMC leaders and tolerated by an inactive police force. The events unfolded under the guise of opposition to legislative reform, but the scale and nature of the attacks point to something far more sinister.

Despite the seriousness of the findings, there has been little national outrage or media coverage. Those who frequently raise concerns over “democratic backsliding” have remained silent, raising serious questions about selective activism and whether justice will ever be served for the victims of this violence.

(With Inputs From OpIndia)

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

TMC Leader And Former Union Minister Yashwant Sinha Bizarrely Claims Operation Sindoor, Uri, And Pulwama Actions Were Election-Driven, Not Anti-Terror Moves

In a candid discussion with senior advocate and Congress veteran Kapil Sibal, former Union Minister Yashwant Sinha criticized the Modi-led government, accusing it of using India’s military response to the Pahalgam terror attack as a political strategy ahead of the Bihar Assembly elections. Sinha, who formerly served as India’s External Affairs Minister and was once a senior BJP leader, suggested that Pakistan-backed terrorist incidents appear to align suspiciously with Indian election timelines.

He pointed out that the Pulwama attack occurred just before the 2019 general elections and claimed a similar pattern is evident with the recent Pahalgam incident, happening ahead of Bihar polls. Sinha alleged that the ruling party exploits matters of national security to gather votes and claimed that Prime Minister Modi previously used the Pulwama and Uri attacks as rallying points during campaigns.

When Kapil Sibal described the military operation as a retaliatory act following the terror attack, Yashwant Sinha responded by drawing a connection between such actions and electoral timing. He remarked, “Bihar elections were coming. When Pulwama happened, elections were coming. Uri was attacked and after that surgical strike took place and in the election Modiji gave speech in which he said for the first time I would like to appeal against voters that they should vote us on behalf of martyrs of Pulwama. Now tell me. The issue of national security was politicised by the martyrs from Pulwama and that’s why whatever happened now I believe it is being done with full focus on Bihar elections.”

Further, he criticized the government for lacking transparency and accountability, particularly for not sharing detailed information about either the Pulwama or Pahalgam attacks. According to him, the public was kept in the dark in both cases.

Sinha also questioned the Prime Minister’s media conduct, stating that Modi avoids press conferences and cannot speak without a teleprompter.

Critique of the $5 Trillion Economy Goal

Turning his attention to economic policy, Sinha dismissed the government’s $5 trillion economy target, calling it an illusion. He mockingly noted that people in his former constituency don’t even comprehend the term “trillion.” Sibal concurred, saying that the goal is meaningless without a rise in per capita income—something the current government has failed to achieve. Sinha accused the Modi administration of peddling unrealistic dreams to the public.

Foreign Policy Under Fire

Sinha was equally scathing about India’s foreign policy. He argued that PM Modi has overly centralized control, diminishing the role of the External Affairs Minister. Sinha went so far as to call current Foreign Minister Dr. S. Jaishankar merely “a glorified foreign secretary,” claiming that Modi has turned foreign policy into a personal project.

He also questioned the utility of Modi’s frequent international visits, sarcastically saying the Prime Minister has probably traveled everywhere except Timbuktu. Sinha claimed these trips have cost taxpayers heavily with little diplomatic return, highlighting India’s isolation during a recent IMF vote concerning Pakistan, where no country stood with India.

Mocking the government further, both Sinha and Sibal joked that only Taiwan, the Taliban, and Israel currently support India on the world stage.

Restoring Kashmir’s Statehood

Addressing the situation in Kashmir, Sinha condemned the Modi government for deepening the alienation of Kashmiris. He advocated for the reinstatement of Article 370 and the restoration of full statehood. It is important to note that the Supreme Court of India had upheld the constitutional removal of Article 370 in a recent ruling.

Sinha Reflects on BJP’s Transformation

Concluding his remarks, Sinha contrasted the BJP of the past with its present-day avatar. According to him, the earlier BJP was inclusive and secular, whereas the current leadership governs by creating social and political divisions. Sibal credited Sinha for his instrumental role in strengthening India-U.S. relations, particularly during the lifting of nuclear sanctions during his tenure.

(With Inputs From OpIndia)

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Congress Leader Vijay Wadettiwar Gives Ammo To Pakistan, Questions India Neutralizing Pakistan’s Drones Of Chinese Origin

On 21 May 2025, Congress leader Vijay Wadettiwar gave ammo to Pakistan by questioning the Modi government regarding potential casualties or damage sustained by Indian forces following the border escalation that ensued after the recent terrorist attack in Pahalgam.

Addressing a press conference, Wadettiwar noted that “doubts are emerging” over whether Indian troops suffered any losses during the exchange. He referenced unconfirmed reports claiming that Pakistan deployed thousands of inexpensive, Chinese-manufactured drones, prompting India to retaliate with highly expensive missile systems.

“There are discussions that they (Pakistan) launched 5,000 China-made drones and the value of each drone was ₹15,000. To destroy each drone worth ₹15,000, we launched missiles worth ₹15 lakhs. This was a part of China’s tactic…There are also discussions that our 3-4 Rafale jets were shot down…The government should give a clarification,” he remarked.

Wadettiwar went on to allege that India’s decision to halt military action was influenced by pressure from the United States. He also questioned whether there were any significant losses on the Indian side, such as damage to Rafale fighter jets.

Why is it wrong to ask these questions in a democracy?” he said. “Was there any loss? Were any of our Rafale jets hit? How many soldiers were injured? If the Pakistani soldier in our custody was returned and we stopped the operation based on U.S. instructions, the public has a right to know.”

The Congress leader demanded that the Centre be forthcoming about the outcome of Operation Sindoor, launched on 7  May in response to the Pahalgam terror strike which killed 26. The operation targeted terrorist facilities in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir (PoK), reportedly eliminating nearly 100 militants and severely damaging key terror infrastructure.

Despite India’s success in neutralising threats, Wadettiwar insisted that any possible setbacks should also be shared openly with the public. “There are rumors that three or four Rafale jets were brought down. The government should issue a clear statement denying these claims and confirming the benefits of Operation Sindoor.”

He further criticised the BJP-led Centre for what he called a performative celebration. “This is the first time I’ve seen a victory rally right after a war. The public is left with many questions. There’s growing skepticism about this government’s narrative,” he concluded.

Though hostilities ceased on 10 May after a mutual agreement between Indian and Pakistani military officials, the Opposition continues to press the government for greater accountability and transparency.

(With Inputs From ANI)

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

 

CPI Condemns Modi Govt For Eliminating Dreaded Naxal

In a shocking display of support for a banned extremist group, the Communist Party of India (CPI) has publicly denounced the recent anti-Maoist operation in Chhattisgarh that resulted in the death of Nambala Keshava Rao, alias Basavaraju—the General Secretary and top commander of the CPI (Maoist), an organisation officially designated as a terrorist group by the Indian government under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) since 22 June 2009.

On 21 May, security forces carried out a high-stakes mission, codenamed Operation Kagar, in the dense Abujhmad forests of Chhattisgarh’s Narayanpur district. The operation culminated in the elimination of Basavaraju, who had a bounty of ₹1.5 crore on his head and was considered the mastermind behind some of the most brutal Maoist attacks in the country. His death is being viewed by security agencies as a critical success in the fight against the decades-long insurgency.

However, instead of supporting the action, the CPI condemned the encounter, describing it as a “cold-blooded killing” and an example of unlawful state conduct.

CPI General Secretary D. Raja released a statement on 21 May, asserting, “CPI strongly condemns the cold-blooded killing of a senior Maoist leader along with several Adivasis in Chhattisgarh. It is yet another instance of extrajudicial action carried out under the guise of counterinsurgency operations. The repeated use of lethal force instead of lawful arrest raises serious concerns about the State’s commitment to democratic norms and the rule of law. If the authorities had credible intelligence about the whereabouts of the leader, why was a legal arrest not pursued? Why was due process—guaranteed by the Constitution—so blatantly ignored. These killings not only point to a dangerous pattern of State violence but also expose the ongoing marginalisation of Adivasi communities in the region. Time and again, these communities are caught in the crossfire of a conflict they did not initiate, and are treated as collateral in operations marked by impunity. CPI demands an independent judicial inquiry into this episode and the entire Operation Kagar. The people of Chhattisgarh—and India at large—deserve to know the truth.  A democratic society cannot allow the State to become the judge, jury, and executioner. Justice must be served, and the dignity and rights of Adivasi lives must be upheld. CPI calls upon all democratic and progressive forces to raise their voices against this injustice and stand in solidarity with the people of Chhattisgarh.”

Who Was Basavaraju, Also Known as “The Red Commander”?

Born in 1955 in the village of Jiyannapet in Andhra Pradesh, Nambala Keshava Rao, popularly known as Basavaraju, was an engineering graduate from NIT Warangal. Despite his academic background, he joined the People’s War Group in the early 1980s, immersing himself in the armed Maoist movement.

In 1987, he is believed to have undergone guerrilla warfare training with the LTTE (Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam), a skillset he would later use to orchestrate deadly IED attacks across Maoist-affected regions in India.

Basavaraju was reportedly the mastermind behind several major attacks, including:

  • The 2010 Dantewada massacre, where 76 CRPF personnel were killed in one of the deadliest Maoist attacks in India.
  • The 2013 Jeeram Ghati ambush, which resulted in 27 deaths, including senior Congress leaders.
  • The 2003 Alipiri bomb attack, an unsuccessful attempt on the life of then Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister N. Chandrababu Naidu.

In 2018, he rose to the position of General Secretary of the CPI (Maoist) after the retirement of Ganapathy (Muppala Lakshmana Rao), assuming the role of both ideological leader and tactical strategist. For years, he remained underground, managing operations and evading law enforcement.

Operation Kagar

‘Operation Kagar’ was the codename for a coordinated assault aimed at top Maoist commanders operating in the forested belt connecting Narayanpur, Bijapur, and Dantewada in Chhattisgarh. Following sustained intelligence tracking, the operation was launched on May 19 by joint units of the District Reserve Guard (DRG), the Special Task Force (STF), and the CRPF.

Over the course of a 50-hour gunbattle, more than 30 Maoists were killed, including Basavaraju. Security personnel seized a large stockpile of weapons, ammunition, and strategic Maoist documents, signaling a critical blow to the insurgents’ infrastructure and leadership.

Among those neutralized were high-ranking figures from the Dandakaranya Special Zonal Committee (DKSZC) and the People’s Liberation Guerrilla Army (PLGA). Authorities are continuing to search the area for survivors and additional rebel hideouts.

The encounter, while successful, came at a cost. One DRG personnel lost his life in the operation. His body was later recovered and brought back to the district headquarters.

Despite harsh terrain and well-armed resistance, state and central forces remained determined to dislodge Maoist presence from Abujhmad, considered one of the group’s last strongholds in central India.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

 

“Were You Crawling Or Slithering Away?” — AIADMK’s EPS Slams Stalin’s Delhi Visit, Says Trip Is To Save Family, Not Tamil Nadu

eps stalin thoothukudi college blast

The political temperature in Tamil Nadu rose sharply as Leader of the Opposition and AIADMK General Secretary Edappadi K. Palaniswami (EPS) launched a scathing attack on Chief Minister M.K. Stalin for his decision to attend the upcoming NITI Aayog meeting in New Delhi. EPS accused Stalin of putting personal interests above public welfare, suggesting that the visit was not about state concerns, but family-related issues.

Palaniswami highlighted Stalin’s earlier stance, where he had proudly claimed to boycott NITI Aayog meetings, citing the Centre’s alleged neglect of Tamil Nadu. “The puppet king @mkstalin, who once boasted, ‘I am boycotting the NITI Aayog meeting because the central government is neglecting Tamil Nadu,’ is now reportedly flying to Delhi to attend that very NITI Aayog meeting!”

He also implied that the timing of the visit was suspicious, linking it to recent Enforcement Directorate (ED) raids connected to the TASMAC liquor scam. He mocked, “He who does not go when there is a need for the people of Tamil Nadu, but he rushes off when there is a need for his family! Back then, his father went to Delhi for 2G… Today… TASMAC… Tyagi…  Thambi (younger brother)… Has the white umbrella been summoned again? He’s completely given in… All thanks to the trouble caused by ‘Thambi’ (younger brother)! #Who_Is_That_Thambi.”

In response, Chief Minister M.K. Stalin quipped, “I’m going to Delhi on the 24th to assert Tamil Nadu’s rightful financial claims at the #NITIAayog meeting! Why does this pains the Leader of the Opposition, Palaniswami, who, despite shifting loyalties from Sasikala to Amit Shah, has never outgrown his habit of catching legs under the table? Isn’t it shameful for Palaniswami to speak, who boldly declared there would be no alliance with the BJP, turned into ‘Pulikeshi’ by waving the white flag after just one raid before the words even dried on his tongue and now has the audacity to accuse me of raising the white flag? This hand of Stalin is the hand that holds the red and black flag of the Kazhagham (DMK)! It is the hand lifted by Peraringar himself! The hand that walked holding Kalaignar’s hand!
I will always carry the flag of rights! I will never crawl! Even today, I have approached the Supreme Court to fight for Tamil Nadu’s rightful claims. I will stand firm in my principles! And I will fight and win the financial dues owed to Tamil Nadu!”

In a sharp counterattack to Chief Minister M.K. Stalin’s criticisms, AIADMK General Secretary Edappadi K. Palaniswami (EPS) turned up the heat. Referring to Stalin’s sudden decision to attend the upcoming NITI Aayog meeting, EPS said, “For the past three years, you boasted that “Tamil Nadu is being neglected” and refused to attend the #NITIAayog meetings and did not seek the fair financial rights of Tamil Nadu as the Chief Minister. So why are you suddenly attending now? Is it really for Tamil Nadu? Not at all.It’s for your family, isn’t it? Who’s afraid of the raids, Mr @mkstalin that fear is your own reflection in the mirror! Why are you talking to yourself, then? When the CBI raided the upper floors of Arivalayam (DMK headquarters), were you and your father, who had surrendered 63 constituencies under the table crawling? Or slithering away? When in opposition you waved black balloons, and now in power you wave white umbrellas—were you crawling then? Or slithering in?”

He then launched a scathing attack, questioning Stalin’s moral authority, “Which is Stalin’s hand?

  • Stalin’s hand that leaked the FIR in the Anna University case, revealing personal details of the victimized student. 
  • The hand that appointed Jaffer Sadiq, a known international drug mafia leader, as a DMK overseas wing organizer.
  • The hand that protects sexual offenders from Gnanasekaran to Deivaseyal, and the “SIRs” behind them — that’s your hand.
  • In the case of the 10-year-old girl from Anna Nagar, when the High Court itself ordered a CBI probe due to lack of faith in your police, it was your hand that took the case all the way to the Supreme Court in protest — again, your hand.
  • The hand that bartered Tamil Nadu’s rights — from Mekedatu to Mullaperiyar — for electoral alliances? That’s your hand!”

EPS contrasted this with his own actions stating, “When the 7.5% internal reservation was brought in and the Governor refused to sign off, I was the one who, using Article 162 of the Constitution, issued the Government Order and protected Tamil Nadu’s rights! Back then you were cooking up politics at the gates of Raj Bhavan — do you remember? That’s why you have no right to lecture me, someone who walks in the path of the honorable Amma, about state rights. You, who sold out Tamil Nadu’s interests from Katchatheevu to Cauvery, are in no position to talk about state autonomy. If you do, the people will only laugh. We’ll come to all of that later.”

Bringing the focus back to the real issue, EPS asked, “But what was the question I raised? #Who_Is_That_Thambi (younger brother)? What’s the relationship between you and him? They say that the person (brother) is very important to you and your son, why did that brother flee the country after the ED raid? There’s growing public suspicion that you and your family may be connected to the massive looting in TASMAC carried out by “Thambi.” If you have courage, integrity, and honesty—answer that first. Then talk about everything else. I’m fully ready to counter all your twisted narratives. But the people deserve to know the truth! So I ask once again: #Who_Is_That_Thambi? @arivalayam.”

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

 

 

 

 

AIADMK IT Wing Slams Party Hopper Aadhav Arjuna

The AIADMK IT Wing has slammed Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) Election Management General Secretary Adhav Arjuna for his recent comments targeting the party. In a recent interview, Arjuna had questioned AIADMK’s alliance with the BJP and attributed the party’s past electoral losses to that decision.

Speaking to the media about TVK’s current activities, Arjuna stated, “We immediately opposed AIADMK’s alliance with the BJP, calling it a mistake. The people have already punished them through the ballot. Why should we criticize those already rejected by the public? AIADMK is no longer in power, so why align with a party that keeps losing elections?”

In response, AIADMK’s IT Wing fired back, questioning Arjuna’s credibility. In a post on social media, the party stated, “Adhav Arjuna, a businessman-turned-politician who has master the art of switching between multiple parties, has no qualms in commenting on @AIADMKOfficial. Sitting in TVK today, even you may not know which party you’ll belong to tomorrow. Therefore, your remarks don’t warrant a response.”

The Ambitious Businessman Aadhav Arjuna: The Party-Hopper of Tamil Nadu Politics

Aadhav Arjuna’s political career is marked by calculated shifts and strategic realignments, reflecting both his growing ambition and changing ideological leanings. Here’s a streamlined look at his evolving political path:

  • Early Beginnings with DMK: Arjuna entered the political scene as a strategist for the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) during the 2021 Tamil Nadu Assembly elections, gaining early exposure to high-level campaign planning.
  • Shift to VCK: In 2023, he moved to the Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi (VCK), under the leadership of Thol Thirumavalavan. By January 2024, he had risen to the role of Deputy General Secretary, announced during the party’s Vellum Jananayagam conference. His direct criticism of dynastic politics—particularly aimed at the DMK—led to internal friction within VCK. As a result, he was suspended from the party in December 2024. Soon after his suspension, Arjuna officially resigned, stating his intention to continue pursuing a political path rooted in democracy, equality, and social justice—this time, independently.
  • Entry into TVK: In early 2025, Arjuna joined Tamilaga Vetri Kazhagam (TVK), the newly launched political party led by part-time- politician Vijay. He was appointed General Secretary in charge of Election Campaign Management. In his new role, Arjuna works closely with campaign strategist Jhon Arokiasamy, focusing on building TVK’s electoral framework and expanding its grassroots reach.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Kerala’s University Amendment Bill Draws Ire For Gagging Dissent Against State, While Allowing Criticism Of Centre

The Kerala government’s proposed University Laws (Amendment) Bill has sparked significant controversy, with critics warning that it could compromise academic autonomy and heighten state control over higher education institutions.

A particularly contentious clause in the bill bars faculty members at universities and colleges from participating in any activity that voices criticism of state laws or university rules. Interestingly, it allows for criticism of central government policies, a distinction that has raised alarms about the selective suppression of dissent and the erosion of free speech in academic spaces.

Additionally, the legislation requires that all materials distributed on campus—whether in print, online, or otherwise—not contradict university regulations or state laws. This requirement is widely perceived as a means to silence opposition within academic circles.

This development comes in the wake of a previous incident in which Raj Bhavan expressed dissatisfaction with vice-chancellors and professors attending a state-sponsored seminar that opposed sections of the draft UGC regulations. Following the backlash, most vice-chancellors opted out of the seminar. Observers believe this controversy may have influenced the decision to omit restrictions on criticizing the central government in the revised amendment.

The bill also extends significant new powers to the Minister for Higher Education, who serves as the Pro-Chancellor of state universities. Under the proposed changes, the minister would gain direct oversight over academic and administrative affairs—including authority to inspect university facilities, academic programs, exams, and financial dealings. Opponents argue that these provisions could erode institutional independence and invite increased political interference in academic governance.

Currently, the bill awaits the Governor’s decision. In the past, similar proposals were stalled due to concerns about the preservation of university autonomy. The ongoing debate highlights the complex relationship between regulatory oversight and the freedom of academic institutions in Kerala.

(With Inputs From Mathrubhumi)

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

NCW Takes Suo Motu Action On Sexual Abuse And Grooming Allegations Against DMK Youth Wing Functionary Deivaseyal; Seeks Action Taken Report Within 3 Days

The National Commission for Women (NCW) has taken suo motu cognizance of a disturbing case involving a 21-year-old college student from Arakkonam, Tamil Nadu, who has accused DMK youth wing functionary Deivaseyal of sexual harassment and attempted grooming for politicians. The survivor recently shared an emotional video online, expressing her anguish and alleging that the police were treating her like a criminal while the accused remained at large and unaccountable.

In response, the NCW on 21 May 2025, issued a formal communication to the Director General of Police (DGP), Tamil Nadu, urging a swift, fair, and transparent investigation. The Commission stressed the importance of safeguarding the survivor, forming an independent investigative team, ensuring no political interference, and taking appropriate action under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The NCW also requested a detailed Action Taken Report and a copy of the FIR within three days.

On its official account on platform X, the NCW stated, “NCW has taken Suo-motu cognisance of a disturbing media report titled “DMK leader’s wife alleges he forced girls to ‘sleep with politicians’”, involving serious allegations of sexual harassment and coercion by a DMK youth wing office bearer. In light of the grave nature of the accusations and the political affiliations of the accused, the Hon’ble Chairperson has written to the DGP of Tamil Nadu urging immediate, impartial, and transparent investigation. The letter emphasizes the need to ensure the survivor’s safety, constitute an independent investigation team, prevent any political interference, and take prompt action under relevant provisions of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The Commission has also sought a detailed Action Taken Report along with a copy of the FIR within three days.”

College Student’s Heart-Wrenching Plea Prompts NCW Action

The National Commission for Women’s decision to take suo motu cognizance of the sexual harassment allegations against DMK youth wing functionary Deivaseyal comes in the wake of a deeply emotional video shared by the 21-year-old survivor on social media. In her video, the student expressed severe distress over the authorities’ handling of her case, alleging that instead of supporting her, the police have been treating her like an offender, while the accused remains untouched.

She further accused the DMK IT Wing of breaching her privacy by publicly sharing her personal photos and copies of her statements on social media. Despite lodging a complaint at the Tamil Nadu DGP’s office three days prior, she stated that no FIR had been filed, and no action had been taken. Instead, she claimed, police officials were pressuring her to provide the names of 20 other alleged victims, rather than focusing on arresting the accused.

In the video, the student emotionally recounts her situation saying, “When I come out and say, ‘He is doing wrong; he took me out and tried to do this,’ but now I find myself unable to go out. My father is not well, and I can’t take him to the hospital. I’m facing many indirect problems. The police come to my house and take photos, but they are not taking any action. They are treating me like a criminal. Is there no one to deliver justice for women?”

She goes on to describe her frustration with the police, who had allegedly assured her that an FIR would be registered based on her complaint. However, she claims she was made to sign a statement restricting her from disclosing case details, even though she disagreed with how the police handled her narrative.  She said, “Given everything that’s happened, I no longer have the confidence to speak to the media. I fear about committing suicide. I initially reached out to the media because I felt that if I were to lose my life, at least my story would be heard. However, they have left Devaseyal like he is a good man, and still, no FIR has been filed. What did CID Officer Srinath say at the DGP office? He told me to ‘go home confidently; an FIR will be filed with your petition.’ However, I no longer have the confidence I once had. After providing my statement, I found that I did not agree with how they approached my case. They did not ask about the important details, yet they have taken a statement in writing that I should not disclose what I said. I do not agree with that. I don’t have the same confidence as I did before I spoke with the media; I don’t have that mindset now.  It’s been three days since my complaint was filed on Saturday, and there has been no action taken so far. He married me under false pretenses. Why is my situation being questioned? I boldly came forward to say that he cheated me and manipulated me into this situation. Instead of addressing my concerns, they are asking me for the names and locations of 20 other women. Am I expected to go and find them for you? Is there truly no justice for women? The public should bring me justice. They have left him free while doing nothing. I am unsure if any processes are ongoing.”

The survivor also named a DMK IT Wing member, identified as “Rahul”, accusing him of leaking her images and statements online, further endangering her safety and dignity, “The media blurs my face (in their reports, but individuals like) ‘Rahul DMK IT wing’ on Facebook continue to strip away my dignity. When I approached Jafar Siddique sir, he said he would look into it and asked if I had his number. Is it my responsibility to collect his number? If I tell him, he’ll ask me if I have the number, so I can see to it.” 

The Case Background

A 21-year-old second-year college student from Arakkonam in Ranipet district has come forward with serious allegations against a DMK functionary, accusing him of deceit and abuse under the pretense of marriage. Seeking justice, she reached out to multiple authorities but claimed her pleas were ignored.

On 10 May, during a birthday celebration for AIADMK General Secretary Edappadi K. Palaniswami held in Arakkonam, local AIADMK MLA Ravi was present at the event. The student approached him in public and, visibly distressed, submitted a petition detailing her ordeal and urged him to take action.

In her detailed petition, a 21-year-old student from Arakkonam has accused Deivaseyal, the deputy organizer of the DMK Union Youth Wing and a resident of Kavanur, of luring her into a relationship under false pretenses. Despite being married, Seyal allegedly manipulated her into a second marriage, which was reportedly performed at the Karikkal Temple in Sholingar on 31 January. What began as a seemingly consensual relationship took a darker turn by March, when the student claims he began groom her into sexual activities involving powerful DMK politicians.

When she resisted, Seyal allegedly turned physically abusive, beating her regularly and subjecting her to relentless harassment. She accused him of torture and sexual violence, claiming he openly stated that “his job is to force 20-year-old girls to sleep with politicians.” Describing the abuse, she said, “He would bite me like a mad dog,” and threatened to burn her family alive if she ever approached the police.

Unable to cope with the continued abuse, she attempted suicide by consuming poison on 5 April. Her family intervened in time, and she was rushed to Arakkonam Government Hospital before being transferred to Thiruvallur Government Hospital for further treatment. She later alleged that the police failed to investigate this suicide attempt, further compounding her distress.

Even after she left Seyal’s residence and returned to her mother’s home to resume her studies, the harassment reportedly continued. She claimed that Seyal assaulted her on her way to college, caused physical injuries, and destroyed her mobile phone. “He told me, ‘Complain if you want—nothing will happen. The police are on my side.’ Because of him, I tried to take poison,” she said.

The survivor went on to allege that Seyal introduced her to several other men, implying that she was being prepared for sexual exploitation. “He tortured me inside the car and pointed to men, telling me to sleep with them. I can’t even leave my house now. I couldn’t take my exams,” she recounted. She also said he would publicly humiliate and abuse her, even in front of others.

Her efforts to seek justice were repeatedly thwarted by bureaucratic hurdles. When she approached the Arakkonam City Police Station, she was turned away on the grounds of jurisdiction. At the All Women Police Station, she was told the inspector was unavailable and was advised to go to the Taluka Police Station. Frustrated by the inaction, she took her complaint to the Superintendent of Police in Ranipet, only to be redirected once again to the Deputy Superintendent’s office in Arakkonam, where she alleges her complaint was still not seriously pursued.

With no other recourse, she made a direct appeal to local AIADMK MLA Ravi at a public event, pleading for help and highlighting the police’s reluctance to act due to the accused’s connections within the ruling DMK. The MLA reportedly assured her that he would stand by her and push for justice.

Following growing public outrage and media attention, the Arakkonam All Women Police Station finally registered a First Information Report (FIR) against Deivaseyal based on the student’s formal complaint. However, the survivor says she still fears for her safety and questions whether real justice will follow.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally

CPI(M) MP John Brittas Calls Congress Scion Rahul Gandhi ‘Disruptive’ In Parliament, Says Allies Also Disapprove

In a noteworthy revelation, Kerala’s CPI(M) Rajya Sabha MP, John Brittas, has openly criticized Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, suggesting that Gandhi has been more disruptive than constructive in his role as an opposition leader in Parliament. This remark came during a recent interview on a YouTube channel.

According to Brittas, during one of the INDI Alliance’s parliamentary floor meetings, he had urged Rahul Gandhi to refrain from daily disruptions in the House, as the CPI(M) wanted to highlight pressing issues concerning Kerala. However, Brittas indirectly said that Rahul disregarded the request and continued with his approach. Even his own allies, Brittas implied, view Rahul as an obstacle to healthy democratic proceedings.

A video clip of John Brittas discussing Rahul Gandhi has gone viral, with the following excerpts drawing particular attention:

Samdish asks, “Have you said this to Rahul Gandhi? Have you met him?”

John Brittas responds hesitantly, “I met him. I meet him but I don’t think…”

Samdish follows up, “He looks like a sharp person to you?”

To which Brittas candidly admits, “I don’t know, he is not that warm to me.”

Samdish asks, “Why?” And Brittas responds, “I don’t know. I was little critical of his stand in one of the meetings. And I don’t know is that the reason.”

Samdish probes further, “In the alliance meeting? Have you been to the I.N.D.I alliance meetings?”

John Brittas clarifies, “I.N.D.I alliance meetings means it was the meeting of Parliamentary floor leaders meeting.”

Samdish continues, “Okay, What did you say?”

Brittas recalls, “I said it is not good to disrupt Parliament daily. You have to devise some ways. Innovative protest. I said in that meeting, These issues are coming from Kerala! We have to raise them. They were scrapping question hours, discussion debates, also scrap the discussion debate. It make it easier for them. It facilitates them. To make them accountable, we need to run this parliament.”

When asked by Samdish, “What did the opposition say? What did they say?”, Brittas replies, “Many people are supporting me.”

Samdish presses, “They didn’t agree to RG?” Brittas answers, “RJD is also convinced.” Finally, when Samdish reiterates, “No, RG.” Brittas asks, “RG means?”  Samdish says, “Rahul Gandhi,”Brittas concludes, “He had some difficulty in… I don’t know.”

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.