Facebook Instagram X Youtube
Tuesday, May 5, 2026
Facebook Instagram X Youtube
Home Blog Page 452

Periyarist Sundaravalli Shares AI Picture Of PM Modi ‘Kneeling’ To POTUS Trump Following His Ceasefire Claim

By
The Commune
-
sundaravalli periyarist trump modi ceasefire

Since the aftermath of the Indian government’s retaliation, certain Periyarists and Dravidians in Tamil Nadu have shamelessly been spreading either fake news or promoting the idea of peace, despite Pakistan being the sponsor and harbor of terrorism on its soil—especially in light of the horrific Pahalgam massacre of 2025. These Pakistani terror sympathizers refuse to acknowledge India’s military capabilities and are quick to back anti-India propaganda. They have now latched onto the tweets of former U.S. President Donald Trump, who claimed to have mediated peace talks between India and Pakistan, a statement that contradicts Pakistan’s DGMO, who had called for a ceasefire against India. These anti-national Periyarist and Dravidianist factions are more interested in undermining India than accepting the truth or facts.

In this context, the Periyarist figure “Sundaravalli” posted an AI-generated image on her social media account, depicting Pakistan’s Prime Minister kneeling before Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and Modi kneeling before U.S. President Trump. This was clearly an anti-India rhetoric on her official X account under the title “The Truth and Shadow,” which has since faced severe criticism.

https://twitter.com/Sundara10269992/status/1921270707884802059

This came after Donald Trump claimed, “After a long night of talks mediated by the United States, I am pleased to announce that India and Pakistan have agreed to a FULL AND IMMEDIATE CEASEFIRE. Congratulations to both Countries on using Common Sense and Great Intelligence. Thank you for your attention to this matter!”

This was not the first instance of such behavior. Shortly after the Indian armed forces’ retaliation, Dravidian stockist Sundaravalli, in a now-deleted post, sparked widespread outrage by floating a wild conspiracy theory. The Dravidar Kazhagam activist and self-proclaimed Periyarist suggested that the recent terror attack in Pahalgam was not carried out by Islamist terrorists, as widely believed, but was allegedly orchestrated by the Indian Army in collusion with the BJP.

In her inflammatory statement, Sundaravalli claimed, “Those who came as tourists and took off their clothes to see if they were Muslims were in military uniforms. This further confirms suspicions about the BJP. Since a non-BJP opposition party is in power there, we also need to see if the BJP is conspiring with the army.”

But she didn’t stop there. In another outrageous remark, she alleged, “Those who shot and killed tourists in Kashmir after checking if they were Muslims were dressed in military uniforms, carried guns, and have placed the blame on Muslims. The BJP has done this before, using the army.”

She attached pictures of an Indian Army soldier and the newly married tourist whose husband had been shot dead by the terrorists.

Her baseless accusations not only targeted the ruling government but also cast a disgraceful shadow over the Indian Armed Forces—drawing widespread condemnation from netizens and political observers alike. Many have slammed her comments as reckless, deeply irresponsible, and a blatant attempt to politicize a national tragedy for ideological propaganda.

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Pro-Congress Self-Styled ‘Expert’ On Everything Under The Sun Sumanth Raman Goes On Non-Stop Whine Mode Undermining India’s Strategic Achievements In Operation Sindoor

By
The Commune
-
congress simp sumanth raman peddles pakistani propaganda

All-in-all expert and political commentator Sumanth Raman’s rants over the past few days with regard to the stoppage of firing and the press briefings prove he is the greatest Congress sympathizer in the country.

When the news of the stoppage of fire, which was referred to as “ceasefire understanding” by everyone that came after US President Donald Trump’s hurried announcement, Raman, after the press briefing by Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri, called it “Sensible”.

Without paying heed to the minute details and confirmation from the Indian side about the talks, Raman whined about the “government agreeing to talks at a ‘neutral’ location. He wrote, “Talks at a neutral site??? Has our Govt agreed to that also??”

Then he began to complain about “international support,” and no one took India’s side. He wrote, “There is no escaping the fact that when push came to shove not one country took India’s side unequivocally. Not ONE. So much for our diplomacy and foreign policy. #IndiaPakistanConflict”

Then came his rant about how the Pahalgam terrorists were still at large and the Modi government, the diplomats, had done nothing. He wrote, “The terrorists who carried out the Pahalgam massacre are still at large. Despite being hit, Pakistan was still able to mount some retaliation. Pakistan was not isolated diplomatically. They still got the IMF aid package. I’m trying to think of what we got out of all this, that we have paid for with more lives than the 26 we lost at Pahalgam and billions of dollars worth of defence equipment spent, and the damage to some of our towns. Next time there is a terror attack, how will it be any different, even if we retaliate against Pakistan directly? I support the ceasefire, but I’m confused about what the strategic objective of the larger military action beyond the strike on the terrorist hideouts was and what has been achieved. My impression is that our armed forces performed well, but our diplomats and political leadership could have done much better. And the ceasefire was agreed to without any conditions imposed on Pakistan. The only positive I see is that Pakistan knows that the next time it stages a terror attack in India, there will be direct retaliation on Pakistani territory. For a rogue State like Pakistan is that enough of a deterrent? #IndiaPakistanConflict #Ceasefire”

He ensured he peddled Pakistani propaganda and undermined military actions.

Now, he had to give his expert comments on the press briefing. With the stellar military briefing on 11 May 2025, he compared it to the previous ones by Col Sophia Qureshi and Wing Commander Vyomika Singh. He wrote, “Getting Col.Sofia Qureshi and Wg.Cmdr. Vyomika Singh to give the press briefing was a good idea on the day after the strike on the terrorist bases. It was symbolic and sent out a signal. But from then on the subsequent briefings should have been handled by Senior Officers. It was clear that the two of them were only reading prepared text, didn’t explain the visuals properly and did not take questions. MOD should have insisted that their point of view must be put across by senior officers of their choice. Our communication of the Military operation could have been better. #IndiaPakistanCeasefire”

Raman forgot that the previous ones were press briefings while the latest one was a military briefing. He also wrote, “After seeing today’s press briefing it begs the question, why weren’t these officers used earlier to brief the media? The craze for publicity and PR did the Govt in. #IndiaPakistanConflict”

Now that he could not blame the military action, he started complaining about the “de-escalation” in India’s stand after praising the stoppage of fire as “sensible”. He wrote, “From “we will decimate Pakistan” to “we will not share hydrological data with Pakistan” is some come down in 4 days. Godi media’s desperate spin. #IndiaPakistanConflict”

Sumanth Raman stays true to his character yet again even during a time of conflict by ensuring he criticises the government routinely without fail.

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“All Pilots Safe, Objectives Met” – Military’s Sharp Response To The Hindu’s Rafale Speculation

By
The Commune
-
the hindu rafale dgmo press conference pilots safe

The Hindu is facing intense backlash after the Directors General of Military Operations (DGMOs) responded sarcastically to a journalist’s question regarding the Rafale fighter jets, asking if Pakistan had shot one down, during a press briefing. When the question was raised, the DGMO, in a pointed moment, asked the reporter from The Hindu, “Are you surprised that you got this question?” This exchange quickly went viral, with social media users heavily trolling the newspaper.

The controversy erupted after The Hindu published an article amid heightened India-Pakistan military tensions, suggesting that Pakistan had shot down Indian aircraft. However, the newspaper failed to verify the facts before spreading this claim, only later admit and apologize for the incident.

The Hindu Reporter’s Question On Rafale

The low point of the DGMO’s press briefing came when a reporter from The Hindu repeatedly pressed for information about potential losses of Indian military jets during the conflict. Air Marshal A K Bharti firmly rejected the question, highlighting that India was still in an active combat situation, and revealing operational details could give an advantage to the enemy. He emphasized that the real question was whether the mission’s objectives were accomplished—and the clear answer was a definitive “Yes.” He also reassured the public, saying, “All our pilots are safe.”

The DGMO was ready to wrap up the briefing with two final questions, and called another journalist, it was Dinakaran from The Hindu newspaper, who hesitantly introduced himself by saying, “Sir, Dinakaran with The Hindu newspaper.” Maj Gen SS Sharda then asked, “Are you surprised that you got this question?” A brief laugh erupted from the crowd. Dinakaran responded, “No, sir, just a look, sir,” before asking, “Can you clarify how many assets we’ve lost because there’s been a lot of speculation in international media about our platforms, including claims by Pakistan that the Rafale was shot down. Can you put those rumors to rest and clarify?”

Bharti explained, “I’m glad you asked this question. As you know, we are in a combat scenario, and losses are a part of war. But the real question we should be asking—one that we should all ask ourselves, including you—is: Have we accomplished our objectives? Specifically, have we successfully neutralized the terrorist camp? And the answer to that is a resounding yes. The results are there for the world to see. As for specifics—how many, which platforms we might have lost, and so on—I cannot comment at this time because we are still in an active combat situation. Any such details could provide an advantage to the adversary, and we don’t want to give them that opportunity. All I can say is that we have achieved the objectives we set out to accomplish, and all of our pilots are safely back home.”

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

From Indira’s Pyrrhic Victory To Modi’s Measured Might: The Untold Cost Of 1971 & The Left’s Double Standards

By
G Saimukundhan
-
indira gandhi 1971 war modi pakistan india bangladesh ruin economy refugee

After the announcement of “ceasefire” after four days of a conflict between India and Pakistan, which followed the dastardly attack by Pakistani terrorists at Pahalgam on 22 April 2025, I couldn’t help but notice some hypocritical and farcical positions being taken by left wing journalists and congress persons. It was quite apparent that they were conditioned (or indoctrinated) to basically hate Modi and any of his actions, and criticize the BJP led Government’s action, as if their life depended on that.

For instance, they were screaming for some punitive action on Pakistan in the immediate aftermath of the Pahalgam terror attack. Once India initiated diplomatic tightening and suspension of the Indus Water Treaty, they wanted a stronger response. Once India started pummelling Pakistan, first targeting the terror bases, and upon escalation, started targeting much more inside Pakistan, people started sending doves and pigeons in their twitter feeds, and how war is not the solution. Once the ceasefire was announced, they started comparing Modi with Indira to claim that Indira was a better leader. 

Enough of has been said about the reactions of these hypocrites, and their twitter feed and their own utterances stand testimony to their lunacy. But the farcical comparison of Modi with Indira is a baseless attempt to glorify Indira Gandhi, when the reality is entirely different. 

The Genesis Behind Initiation Of War

I am a firm believer of the fact that an individual can be a political animal, with his own personal biases and preferences. He can act emotional; his actions can be irrational influenced by his anger and biases. But an institution has to be emotionless. An institution like the Government should be calm, rational and do what is best for the country. The euphoria or anxiety or anger of the masses for an immediate war cannot be the reason for any Government to declare war. India’s action after the Pahalgam is a case study in mature handling of the situation. 

The decision to initiate a war is one of the gravest things a nation can make, carrying profound consequences for its people, economy, and global standing. Wars are rarely spontaneous; they demand meticulous evaluation of multiple factors to ensure that the costs—human, economic, and political—are justified by the objectives. Factors that must be considered before initiating a war include diplomatic, economic, socio-political, military, ethical, and long-term strategic considerations. 

Lack of foresight would lead to catastrophic miscalculations, such as those seen in the economic fallout of India’s 1971 Bangladesh Liberation War.

Effect of 1971 Bangladesh Liberation War

The war stands as a defining moment in India’s modern history, a testament to its military prowess, and one which led to the creation of Bangladesh, ending Pakistan’s brutal suppression of its eastern wing and securing India’s strategic dominance in South Asia. The war’s economic and socio-political aftermath, coupled with the controversial imposition of the Emergency in 1975, reveals a shortsightedness that cannot be ignored. 

I have sought to examine the multifaceted impacts of the 1971 war, in the geopolitical triumph, it exacerbated India’s economic woes and set the stage for authoritarian measures, raising questions about the wisdom of prioritizing military victories without adequate preparation for their consequences.

The Headline Numbers

For the uninitiated, the most glaring evidence of economic impact of the war are two numbers – (a) Inflation rate which went up to 28% in 1974 and (b) India’s economic growth rate i.e. GDP Growth Rate that plummeted to 1.16%. These are head-rolling numbers, but then the only heads that rolled then was that of the general public. 

The Economic Fallout: A Nation in Tatters

The war’s economic consequences were catastrophic, undermining the narrative of unalloyed triumph. India’s economy, already strained by chronic poverty and dependence on agriculture, was ill-equipped to handle the war’s burdens. The influx of 10 million refugees from East Pakistan strained India’s resources, with estimates suggesting a cost of $700 million (equivalent to $4.5 billion today) to feed and shelter them (Sisson & Rose, 1990). 

War-related expenditures, including military mobilization and support for the Mukti Bahini, further drained the treasury. According to the World Bank, India’s GDP growth plummeted from 5.2% in 1970 to 1.6% in 1971, barely keeping pace with population growth (World Bank, 2025).

The global context exacerbated the crisis. The 1973 OPEC oil shock quadrupled oil prices, hitting India’s import-dependent economy hard. Inflation soared to 16.94% in 1973 and peaked at 28.60% in 1974 (MacroTrends, 2025). Food prices skyrocketed due to war-disrupted agriculture, compounded by droughts in 1972–73. Government’s fiscal deficit ballooned, and foreign exchange reserves dwindled, forcing India to rely on loans from the International Monetary Fund and Soviet aid (Joshi & Little, 1994). These economic woes persisted, with inflation averaging 7–8% through the late 1970s and early 1980s, eroding living standards for millions.

Gandhi’s policies, such as nationalization of banks (1969) and coal mines (1973), aimed to assert state control but failed to address structural inefficiencies. Her government’s focus on populist measures, like the “Garibi Hatao” (Remove Poverty) slogan, did little to mitigate the crisis, as public investment stagnated and industrial growth slowed (Guha, 2007). The war’s economic toll thus exposed the fragility of India’s economic framework, a consequence of prioritizing military victory without a robust plan for post-war recovery.

Refugee Crisis and Additional Fiscal Strain

The influx of approximately 10 million refugees from East Pakistan placed an enormous burden on India’s economy. The cost of supporting these refugees was estimated at around $480 million in FY 1971, with about $200 million covered by foreign grants and the remainder by the Indian government. None of these was either anticipated or were within India’s limited resources. Cost of this unchecked refugee influx has been borne by India till date. The root for all the troubles and entire agitation in Assam can be traced to this. We, as a country, were hit economically and demographically by large amounts of unchecked refugee influx. 

The Emergency: Economic Distress as a Pretext for Authoritarianism

The economic fallout of 1971 set the stage for one of the darkest chapters in India’s democratic history: the Emergency (1975–1977). On June 25, 1975, Gandhi declared a state of emergency, citing “internal disturbances” and economic instability as justifications. Officially, the Emergency was meant to address inflation, hoarding, and black-marketeering. However, this narrative has few buyers. 

The Emergency suspended civil liberties, jailed thousands of opposition leaders, censored the press, and centralized power in an unprecedented manner, drawing comparisons to modern fascism (Dhar, 2000). The economic distress post-1971 provided a convenient pretext. Gandhi’s invocation of economic woes was a smokescreen for consolidating power.

The Emergency thus underscores the war’s long-term socio-political costs: economic distress fueled public unrest, which Gandhi exploited to justify authoritarian measures, tarnishing her democratic credentials.

The Shortsightedness of War: A Broader Perspective

Celebrating the 1971 war to ridicule Modi ignores the broader implications of Gandhi’s decision to prioritize military action without adequate preparation for its diplomatic, economic, and socio-political ramifications. War should not be an exercise in ego satisfaction or a tool to project power; it demands careful consideration of long-term impacts. 

Gandhi’s diplomatic efforts, while successful in securing Soviet support, failed to anticipate the hostility of the U.S., which deployed the USS Enterprise to the Bay of Bengal, signaling a Cold War rift (Raghavan, 2013). Economically, the war’s costs were not offset by contingency plans, leaving India vulnerable to global shocks like the oil crisis. Socio-politically, the war’s fallout contributed to unrest that Gandhi used to justify the Emergency, undermining India’s democratic fabric.

Gandhi’s war, though a humanitarian necessity, was a gamble that prioritized short-term triumph over long-term stability. The economic tatters of the 1970s and the Emergency’s authoritarian legacy highlight the perils of such shortsightedness.

The 1971 Bangladesh Liberation War, though a moment of glory for India and Indira Gandhi, its economic and socio-political costs reveal a critical oversight in her leadership. The war exacerbated India’s economic fragility, contributing to inflation, deficits, and public discontent, which Gandhi later used to justify the Emergency—a move that remains a stain on her legacy. 

Celebrating 1971 to score political points against Modi obscures these complexities, reducing a nuanced historical event to a simplistic narrative. War demands not just courage but foresight, and Gandhi’s failure to balance the two serves as a cautionary tale for leaders today.

References:

  • Dhar, P. N. (2000). Indira Gandhi, the “Emergency,” and Indian Democracy. Oxford University Press
  • MacroTrends. (2025). India Inflation Rate 1960–2025.
  • Raghavan, S. (2013). 1971: A Global History of the Creation of Bangladesh. Harvard University Press
  • World Bank. (2025). India GDP Growth (Annual %)

G Saimukundhan is a Chartered Accountant.

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Pakistan Caught Red-Handed: Cropped Aaj Tak Clip Used As ‘Proof’ Against India In Embarrassing Copycat Press Conference

By
The Commune
-
pakistan india aaj tak clipping airbase attack

As the Indian military briefing was announced, the Pakistani military briefing was postponed by a few hours. In what looked like a ‘xerox’ copy of the Indian briefing at 630PM on 11 May 2025, the Pakistanis have made a fool of themselves by using cropped clippings from Indian news channels, copying the format of the Indian military briefing and making ridiculous claims while presenting with a Powerpoint presentation that will score a zero in front of primary school students in India.

Ridiculous Claims Made By Pakistan

Here is a list of claims the Pakistani Army made during their briefing:

  • Pakistan claimed its response to Indian airstrikes was a “textbook example” of joint tri-services warfare—combining air, land, sea, and cyber operations.
  • The military described the campaign as “precise, proportionate, and restrained,” targeting only Indian military assets allegedly involved in attacks on Pakistani civilians.
  • Pakistani forces claimed to have struck 26 Indian military targets including airbases at Suratgarh, Sirsa, Bhuj, Naliya, Adampur, Bathinda, Barnala, Halwara, Awantipora, Srinagar, Jammu, Udhampur, Mamoon, Ambala, and Pathankot.
  • Specific Indian infrastructure claimed to be hit includes BrahMos missile storage sites at Biasa and Nagrota, S-400 air defense batteries, radar stations, logistics depots, and brigade HQs near the LoC (e.g., KG Top and Nowshera).
  • Pakistan claimed its loitering munitions and long-range missiles caused “major damages” to Indian military installations and command centers.
  • Dozens of Pakistani drones reportedly flew over Indian cities, including New Delhi, to demonstrate long-range unmanned capabilities.
  • Pakistan claimed it executed cyberattacks to temporarily disable Indian military command and communications infrastructure.
  • Despite the breadth of claimed attacks, the spokesperson emphasized that Pakistan exercised restraint and deliberately avoided civilian casualties.
  • They suggested more advanced capabilities were held in reserve for potential future use.
  • Pakistan accused India of escalating terrorist activity in Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa during the conflict to distract from eastern operations.
  • They claimed to have simultaneously conducted successful counterterrorism operations in the western regions.

Cropped Clippings To Peddle Pakistani Propaganda

Now to support these claims, they showcased a list of international media clippings, most of them from CNN, Al Jazeera etc proving their claim of bombing Indian airbases. However, one clipping from Aaj Tak which was actually explaining how India had struck Pakistani airbases was clipped conveniently to portray as if it was the opposite.

PIB also fact checked this to prove Pakistani propaganda wrong. Even though the wordings in the Aaj Tak video read “In smoke – Rawalpindi, Chakwal, Shorkot.. huge loss”, the Pakistanis blurred it to some extent and used it in the video along with other clippings to prove their “success”. 

Instead of showing proofs from their own intelligence and sources, Pakistan relied on international media to “prove” their points.

Copycat ‘Presentation’

India’s high-impact press conference showcased its military successes, including a dramatic video compilation of strikes on Pakistani militant sites, backed by evidence and set to powerful music of the Shiv Tandav Stotram, symbolizing India’s resolve. Commentators praised its professionalism and strategic messaging.  

However, the Pakistani military (ISPR)’s press conference only faced widespread ridicule. Unlike India’s detailed presentation, Pakistan’s version lacked visual proof, relying instead on a verbal list of claimed strikes on Indian targets—including airbases and radar stations—without corroborating footage. Critics mocked it as a “copycat” effort, comparing it to a “school project” and a “circus act.” Additionally, Pakistan’s use of social media clips as “official evidence” further undermined credibility, with analysts highlighting the absence of military-grade verification.  

The contrast was stark: India’s conference emphasized precision and capability, while Pakistan’s appeared unsubstantiated and theatrical. Compounding the embarrassment, Pakistan admitted losing fighter jets (F-16 and JF-17) during operations, fueling speculation about internal military strife. Meanwhile, India doubled down, detailing its capacity to strike deeper into Pakistan if provoked.  

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“Ceasefire Between India And Pakistan Resulted From Stalin’s Rally” Says Comedian Turned Politician Karunas

By
The Commune
-
ceasefire stalin rally karunas india pakistan

Karunas, the actor and former MLA, has stated that the ceasefire between India and Pakistan was a direct result of the rally organized by Chief Minister M.K. Stalin. Speaking at a DMK event in Chennai, Karunas highlighted various achievements from the party, including welfare programs aimed at women, the breakfast initiative, and the provision of government jobs for 10,000 athletes. He expressed admiration for these policies, noting that such schemes were unique to Tamil Nadu and were not implemented in any other state.

In an emotional moment, Karunas praised the breakfast scheme, emphasizing that only those who understand the struggle of hunger can truly appreciate its importance. He also reaffirmed his support for the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK), stating that he had actively campaigned for the party in the southern districts during the 2024 general elections. He expressed pride in the Mukulathor Pullipadai being recognized as an ally of the DMK’s 75th-anniversary celebrations. He also reflected on his family’s connection to the DMK, mentioning his birth name, Karunanidhi, in homage to his late father and his legacy.

In a critical note, Karunas launched a sharp attack on Edappadi K. Palaniswami, accusing him of betraying the Mukulathor community after using them to become Chief Minister. He claimed that Palaniswami attempted to limit the community to a narrow caste identity. Karunas voiced confidence that under Stalin’s leadership, the Mukulathor community would be protected, particularly in the 2026 Tamil Nadu Assembly elections. He also noted that Stalin’s son, Udhayanidhi Stalin, would continue to support the community.

Speaking about the Tri-Cultural Community, which encompasses Hindus, Muslims, and Christians, Karunas emphasized the importance of unity and pride, saying, “Caste is an identity, but sentiment will elevate us. Fanaticism will bring us down. We are not inferior to anyone.” He praised Stalin’s governance as inclusive, transcending caste, religion, and language.

Karunas also recounted his role in organizing a 5-kilometer rally, which brought together former soldiers, students, and civilians under Stalin’s leadership. He proudly stated that before the rally concluded, a ceasefire was announced on the India-Pakistan border, attributing the achievement to Stalin’s efforts. “Think carefully. There is a fight going on here. He is organizing a rally for five kilometers, bringing together all the ex-servicemen, students, and civilians. They have declared a ceasefire even before the rally ends. Understand, this is one of the achievements of the Thalapathi. No state in India, not Kerala, Andhra Pradesh, or Karnataka, has achieved something like this. Stalin is a visionary leader who will remain Tamil Nadu’s Chief Minister for the long term,” Karunas declared confidently.

However, Karunas’ comments quickly sparked a wave of trolling on social media, with many users mocking him for his excessive political “simping” for Stalin. His remarks about the ceasefire were particularly ridiculed, with critics questioning the credibility of his claims and the idea that a state leader’s rally could have such an impact on international diplomacy.

(With inputs from Hindustan Times)

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Egyptian Plane With Boron, US Plane Checking Radioactivity: Did India Really Hit Pakistan’s Nuclear Centres?

By
The Commune
-
india pakistan nuclear egypt nur khan airbase boron cargo plane china

After days of missile strikes and drone assaults across the India-Pakistan border, India launched a powerful and unprecedented aerial retaliation—one that may have taken the escalating conflict to the doorstep of Pakistan’s nuclear command.

Military Briefing

According to top Indian military officials, it was Pakistan’s sustained missile barrage and attempted drone strikes on Indian cities that triggered the Indian response. In a press briefing on 11 May 2025, Air Marshal AK Bharti revealed that India had conducted “precise, measured and calibrated” air strikes targeting key Pakistani military infrastructure, including air bases, command centers, and air defense systems across the western front.

Among the targets reportedly hit were 11 Pakistani military bases—Nur Khan, Rafiqui, Sargodha, Bholari, Murid, Chunian, Pasrur, Sukkur, Sialkot, Skardu, and Jacobabad—within a three-hour window on the night of May 9 and the morning of May 10. Notably, Chaklala Air Base, located within Islamabad and adjacent to the Nur Khan Airbase, was also struck—an operation Indian officials have described as the “turning point.”

Government sources called the strikes “hell fire,” citing significant damage to Pakistan’s air power. According to estimates shared by Air Marshal Bharti, nearly 20% of Pakistan’s Air Force infrastructure was degraded.

Ammunition depots were also targeted, and key Pakistani assets such as F-16s and JF-17 fighter jets were destroyed. Among the casualties was Squadron Leader Usman Yousuf of the Pakistan Air Force.

Nur Khan Airbase

But it’s the hit on Nur Khan Airbase in Rawalpindi that had stirred international concern. Located just kilometers from the Strategic Plans Division—the nerve center managing Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal—Nur Khan functions as a refueling and logistics hub. The proximity of Indian strikes to Pakistan’s nuclear command structure has triggered urgent diplomatic action, including U.S. intervention.

According to international news reports, the Trump administration received “alarming intelligence” suggesting possible escalation toward a nuclear confrontation. While initially dismissing the conflict as “none of our business,” U.S. Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and other top officials quickly reversed course. Diplomatic cables state that Rubio spoke with Pakistan Army Chief Asim Munir before urging India’s Foreign Minister S. Jaishankar to consider ceasefire terms.

India insisted on direct DGMO-level talks only. The conversation reportedly took place on May 10 after Pakistan’s DGMO requested time following the strikes.

Presence Of Egyptian Cargo Plane?

Earlier in the day, a specialized U.S. Nuclear Emergency Support aircraft touched down in Pakistan, reportedly to conduct a reconnaissance mission over the Sargodha region—an area heavily bombarded by Indian airstrikes in recent days.

Adding to the intrigue, an Egyptian Air Force IL-76 military cargo plane is said to have landed in Pakistan in the early hours following the strikes.

Official sources have offered no clarification, but defense watchers noted the possible significance: Egypt’s Nile Delta is rich in Boron-10—a substance with known radiation absorption properties used in nuclear containment.

Interestingly, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar also received a call from his Egyptian counterpart around the same time.

The confluence of these events has fueled speculation: Did India’s strikes come dangerously close to Pakistan’s nuclear infrastructure—and if so, was that intentional?

While no official from either side has confirmed damage to nuclear assets, the fact that both the U.S. and Egypt have taken rapid, high-level actions suggests the world is treating the situation with grave seriousness.

(With inputs from NDTV)

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Al Jazeera Peddles Fake Claim Of “Captured Indian Pilot”, Gets Fact-Checked By Pak Army Itself

By
The Commune
-
al jazeera pakistan pilot capture fake news

Pakistan’s military on 11 May 2025 firmly rejected widely circulated claims—originating from an Al Jazeera report and amplified by social media—that an Indian female Air Force pilot had been captured during recent cross-border hostilities.

In a rare joint press conference held in the late hours of the day, senior officials from Pakistan’s army, navy, and air force addressed the media on the ongoing Operation Bunyan-um-Marsoos, Islamabad’s response to Indian airstrikes earlier in the week.

Lt Gen Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry, the official spokesperson of the Pakistan Army, categorically denied the existence of any captured Indian personnel. “I can confirm to you that we don’t have any pilot in custody. This is all social media chatter—part of multiple sources of fake news and propaganda,” he said, responding to a reporter’s question on the matter.

Earlier, an Al Jazeera report citing unnamed Pakistani military sources had claimed that two Indian fighter jets—specifically Rafale aircraft—had been downed and that a female Indian pilot had been captured. The report even named Squadron Leader Shivani Singh, a claim that was later picked up and circulated widely by pro-Pakistan social media handles.

However, both the Indian and Pakistani governments have since discredited the claim. India’s Press Information Bureau (PIB) issued a fact-check on Saturday, calling the allegations “completely false.” “Indian female Air Force pilot has NOT been captured,” the PIB Fact Check unit posted on social media, attributing the disinformation to pro-Pakistan sources.

The Pakistani military’s on-record denial now marks the first official disavowal from Islamabad itself, essentially undermining the credibility of Al Jazeera’s original report and similar claims propagated online.

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Pro-Congress Self-Styled ‘Expert’ On Everything Under The Sun Sumanth Raman Echoes Pakistani Propaganda, Questions And Trivializes India’s Military Action

By
The Commune
-
congress simp sumanth raman peddles pakistani propaganda

In a time of national security triumph, Sumanth Raman—a perennial simp to the Congress narrative and someone who fashions himself as an expert on everything—has once again chosen to echo the talking points that could’ve come straight from Islamabad’s propaganda playbook. His latest commentary, questioning India’s military objectives and portraying the outcome of the current conflict with Pakistan as a strategic vacuum, is not just misinformed—it is deliberately defeatist.

On his X handle, he wrote, “The terrorists who carried out the Pahalgam massacre are still at large. Despite being hit, Pakistan was still able to mount some retaliation. Pakistan was not isolated diplomatically. They still got the IMF aid package. I’m trying to think of what we got out of all this, that we have paid for with more lives than the 26 we lost at Pahalgam and billions of dollars worth of defence equipment spent and the damage to some of our towns. Next time there is a terror attack how will it be any different even if we retaliate against Pakistan directly? I support the ceasefire but I’m confused about what the strategic objective of the larger military action beyond the strike on the terrorist hideouts was and what has been achieved. My impression is that our armed forces performed well but our diplomats and political leadership could have done much better. And the ceasefire was agreed to without any conditions imposed on Pakistan. The only positive I see is that Pakistan knows that the next time it stages a terror attack in India, there will be direct retaliation on Pakistani territory. For a rogue State like Pakistan is that enough of a deterrent? #IndiaPakistanConflict #Ceasefire”

Let’s set the record straight.

India responded to the Pahalgam massacre with strength and precision. It didn’t just bomb empty buildings. The Indian Air Force struck active terror camps with real-time intelligence, dismantled key infrastructure deep inside Pakistani territory, and most significantly, delivered a bold strike on the Noor Khan Air Base near Rawalpindi—an unmistakable message to Pakistan’s nuclear command. This was not symbolic. It was strategic.

Despite Pakistan launching over 300 drones—many shielded behind civilian air corridors—India’s air defense systems repelled every single one, preventing further loss of civilian life and protecting vital infrastructure. That is not failure. That is capability.

What did Pakistan achieve? A few retaliatory air raids that were swiftly neutralized, some wreckage of dubious value, and a desperate effort to project parity. Their attempt to bait India into a misstep by using U.S.-supplied F-16s failed. Their propaganda videos were exposed. And even in the diplomatic sphere, while Pakistan may have received IMF disbursement—already pre-negotiated—they failed to isolate India or garner any meaningful international support.

The strategic signal was clear: any act of terror on Indian soil will be met not with restraint, but with deliberate, calibrated force—inside Pakistani territory. That’s not just deterrence. It’s doctrine.

And what did the ceasefire achieve? It halted a spiral toward wider war while leaving India with an upper hand militarily and morally. Yet, in Sumanth Raman’s world, it’s a loss unless it ends with a flag on Lahore. He conveniently ignores that national security strategy must balance force with stability, and that India’s restraint after escalation projects strength—not weakness.

The real question here is: why does a prominent Indian voice like Raman’s always seem to find fault with India and sympathy for a rogue state that harbors terrorists? Why does every Indian victory get spun into a narrative of inadequacy?

India acted. India struck. India held the line. And next time Pakistan plots terror, it knows the cost will be real and immediate.

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

India Almost Hit Pakistan’s Nuclear Command Centre With Precision Strike On Noor Khan And Sargodha Airbase: Reports

By
The Commune
-
kirana hills sargodha pakistan operation sindoor

As tensions between India and Pakistan reached a boiling point, India’s missile strike on Rawalpindi’s Noor Khan airbase sent shockwaves through Islamabad, striking at the heart of Pakistan’s military and nuclear command structure. The strategically critical airbase, located dangerously close to Pakistan’s nuclear weapons control headquarters, served as a stark warning—India possessed the capability to decapitate Pakistan’s nuclear command authority if necessary.

The strike came amid escalating hostilities following a deadly terrorist attack in Kashmir on April 22, which killed 26 people, mostly Hindu tourists. India retaliated with precision strikes targeting terror camps, but the attack on Noor Khan marked a dramatic escalation. The airbase, a key transport and refueling hub for Pakistan’s air force, also lies near the headquarters of the Strategic Plans Division, the body overseeing Pakistan’s estimated 170 nuclear warheads.

New York Times reported, “One former American official long familiar with Pakistan’s nuclear program noted on Saturday that Pakistan’s deepest fear is of its nuclear command authority being decapitated. The missile strike on Nur Khan could have been interpreted, the former official said, as a warning that India could do just that.”

The move triggered panic in Islamabad, with reports suggesting Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif hastily convened a meeting of Pakistan’s National Command Authority—the group responsible for nuclear decisions. While Pakistan’s defense minister later denied the meeting took place, the mere possibility underscored the gravity of India’s warning.

It is noteworthy that India struck nearly 11 air bases of Pakistan.

Fearing a rapid escalation toward nuclear conflict, the US is said to have intervened, with Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio engaging in urgent diplomacy. Their efforts, along with pressure from Saudi Arabia and the UAE, eventually led to a ceasefire announced by President Trump. However, the damage was done—India had demonstrated its ability to strike deep into Pakistan’s military nerve center, exposing Islamabad’s worst nightmare: the vulnerability of its nuclear command structure.

The message was clear. India’s surgical strike on Noor Khan was not just retaliation—it was a calculated signal that Pakistan’s nuclear deterrent could be neutralized if the conflict spiraled further.

India had also struck the Sargodha air base which according to reports holds underground nuclear storage under the Kirana hills. The hills have deep underground sites with atleast 6 visible entrances as evident from Google maps. This base was hit with multiple loitering penetrating munitions which must have made Pakistan shiver.

So, it is pretty clear that India holds knowledge of where Pakistan holds its nuclear weapons and has hit them where it hurts which is why Pakistan came begging for a ceasefire and its so-called Prime Minister desperately claimed victory when they clearly have stood naked before India.

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

1...451452453...1,856Page 452 of 1,856
TheCommune
The Commune is a news and views portal focusing on social and political issues of the southern part of India with a focus on Tamil Nadu.
Contact us: thecommune.news@gmail.com
Facebook Instagram X Youtube

NATIONAL NEWS

Bengal’s Decisive Shift: What Are The Forces Behind BJP’s Bengal Breakthrough?

Bengal’s Decisive Shift: What Are The Forces Behind BJP’s Bengal Breakthrough?

The Commune - 0
The 15-year regime of Trinamool Congress (TMC) rule is now a matter of history. The 2026 West Bengal Assembly election marks a significant political...
© The Commune 2025. All Rights Reserved.