Once again, Congress MP Shashi Tharoor finds himself in a controversy as his article published in a Bangladeshi newspaper refers the Indian Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir as “India Administered Kashmir,” a term often used by Western media and organizations to dispute India’s claims over Kashmir.
Shashi Tharoor recently penned an op-ed titled “Potential Loss for Modi” in Project Syndicate, which Bangladeshi news outlet The Daily Star later leveraged to bolster their agenda of advocating for Kashmir. The piece challenges the initial assumption of a comfortable victory for Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). Shashi Tharoor opined that indicators suggest diminishing support for the BJP, with voters feeling disenchanted due to unmet promises, especially concerning job creation and economic well-being.
The Congress leader claimed that despite Modi’s personal popularity, the BJP’s campaign faces apathy and critique, fueled by inflammatory rhetoric against Muslims and opposition parties. The BJP employs various tactics, including absorbing opposition figures, forging alliances, and resorting to intimidation when persuasion fails. However, signs of a resurgence in the opposition and voter fatigue with the BJP’s governance hint at a possible shift in electoral outcomes, particularly in states where the BJP’s dominance is being challenged. Absent recent galvanizing events like the 2019 terrorist attack in Kashmir, the BJP’s electoral prospects appear uncertain, with public dissatisfaction over its performance and a growing confidence among opposition ranks.
Even-though the criticism directed towards Modi and the BJP has been poorly articulated like sentiment sway of votes in 2019 due to Pulwama attack, when referring to Indian states as “administered,” suggesting that Jammu and Kashmir was not originally an integral part of India but acquired later. This stance by a senior Congress MP has sparked widespread criticism on social media.
Shashi Tharoor had written “After all, in 2019, the BJP got a major boost from a terrorist attack on a military convoy in Indian-administered Kashmir, which was carried out just a couple of months before the vote by the Pakistan-based group Jaish-e-Mohammed. With no such event galvanising Indian voters today, the BJP cannot hope to replicate its performance from the last election.”
Shashi Tharoor writes article in Bangladeshi Newspaper that 'Modi Might Lose'. No issues with it.
But why @ShashiTharoor is calling Kashmir 'Indian-administered Kashmir'?
During election, article in Islamic nation calling Indian-administered Kashmir, what is Congress conveying? pic.twitter.com/wvgQVXsaVN
— Ankur Singh (Modi Ka Parivar) (@iAnkurSingh) May 6, 2024
Politically Motivated Appeasement
Congress leader and MP Shashi Tharoor previously echoed a different sentiment where he shared a post on his social media account. The post featured correspondence from British MPs affirming that Jammu and Kashmir is an integral part of India, both historically and in perpetuity. The correspondence forwarded to his counterpart, emphasizing the importance of correcting the notion that J&K is merely administered by India rather than being an integral part of the nation. In that post, Shashi Tharoor was remarked positively on a British MP acknowledging the straightforward reality that Jammu and Kashmir is a state that fully acceded to India in 1947, not merely an “India-administered” territory.
In another post from 2019, Shashi Tharoor asserts that Jammu and Kashmir has been an inseparable part of India since 1947.
I remain strongly critical of the Govt's actions on Kashmir, but the West Bank analogy is wrong: at the UN,Kashmir is not “occupied territory" but“disputed territory,” &part of India since 1947; also Kashmiris have Indian citizenship, unlike Palestinians living in the West Bank.
— Shashi Tharoor (@ShashiTharoor) August 9, 2019
After much uproar, Shashi Tharoor in an X post claimed that he “never used such a term in any of his writings or statements anywhere, ever”.
” It has been interpolated by the editors of the newspaper that my syndicated column appeared in. I disavow such language unequivocally, but have no control over what foreign newspaper editors do.”, Shashi Tharoor said.
I do not agree with that usage and have never used such a term in any of my writings or statements anywhere, ever. It has been interpolated by the editors of the newspaper that my syndicated column appeared in. I disavow such language unequivocally, but have no control over what… https://t.co/eMHiDjoFSx
— Shashi Tharoor (@ShashiTharoor) May 6, 2024
Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personal