Home Blog Page 82

Kerala-Based Malabar Gold & Diamonds Threatens Activists With Legal Notice For Highlighting Its Collaboration With Pakistani Influencer Who Called Operation Sindoor As ‘Cowardly’

malabar gold pakistani influencer

Kerala-based jewellery giant Malabar Gold & Diamonds is embroiled in a significant controversy following its decision to extend a VIP invitation to a known anti-India and pro-Pakistan social media influencer for the inauguration of its newly expanded showroom in Birmingham, UK. The event, held on 6 September 2025 and headlined by Bollywood actress Kareena Kapoor Khan, has drawn sharp criticism for the company’s association with Alishba Khalid, an Instagram influencer with a history of posting virulently anti-India content.

The controversy centres on Khalid’s social media activity, particularly her posts from May 2025 condemning India’s ‘Operation Sindoor’. In now-deleted but widely circulated posts, she labelled the operation a “cowardly act,” accused India of hypocrisy, and ended with “PAKISTAN ZINDABAD.” In another post, she explicitly stated, “I know 60% of my followers are from India and to be honest, I don’t care anymore,” and concluded with a prayer for Pakistan’s protection from harm and evil. A further post from May 7 threatened, “Just wait now our turn will come. And we will answer with truth and unshakable strength.”

Sends Legal Notice Instead Of Apology

Facing a massive public backlash and accusations of sympathising with Pakistan, Malabar Gold, owned by M.P. Ahammed, has taken a legal route instead of issuing a public apology. The company filed a suit in the Bombay High Court, seeking an injunction to remove what it termed “defamatory” social media posts connecting the brand to the influencer’s political views.

In a hearing on 29 September 2025, before Justice Sandeep V. Marne, the company’s counsel argued that the engagement of Khalid was arranged through a third-party agency, JAB Studios, and was finalized much prior to the Pahalgam attack and her subsequent controversial posts. The plaintiff contended that they were unaware of her connections to Pakistan and her anti-India stance at the time of hiring and have since discontinued her services. They alleged that the online campaign was a strategic move by competitors to damage their business during the festive season.

The court granted an ad-interim injunction in favour of Malabar Gold, ordering the listed social media platforms (Defendant Nos. 1 to 7) to pull down the 442 URLs identified by the company and restraining them from permitting further publication of such material. The ruling has intensified the debate, with critics arguing the company is attempting to silence public outrage over its poor vetting process rather than addressing the core issue of its association with a figure who has openly celebrated violence against India.

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Four Arrested In Trichy For Burning Effigy Of Lord Rama, Case Filed

Aintham Tamilar Sangam Throws Slippers & Burns Lord Ram Effigy Ahead Of Vijayadasami arrested

A few days ago, a video of a group of people from the Aintham Tamilar Sangam burning an effigy of Lord Rama went viral on social media.

Following immense pressure from BJP Youth Wing Tamil Nadu, the Tiruchirappalli District Police have arrested four individuals for allegedly burning an effigy of the Hindu deity Lord Ram and circulating a video of the act on social media. The arrests were made following the registration of a case under the new Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).

The incident occurred on September 28 during an event organized by the “Aintham Tamilar Sangam” in Ayanputhur village. According to a police press release, a flex banner featuring an image of Lord Ram was beaten with sandals, set on fire, and the act was filmed. The video, which surfaced on a Facebook page called “Aintham Tamilar” on September 30, showed participants chanting “Praise Ravana” and included contact numbers for the organization.

Based on a complaint from a social media monitoring officer, the Cyber Crime police registered a case (FIR No. 18/25) on October 2. The charges include sections 192, 196(1)(a), 197, 299, 302, and 353(2) of the BNS, related to intent to provoke a breach of peace, outraging religious feelings, and criminal intimidation.

The first accused, Aadikalaraj from Pudukkottai District, was arrested on October 2. Three others—Thilakeswaran (Ramanathapuram), Napoleon (Namakkal), and Vasanthakumar (Kallakurichi)—were arrested and sent to judicial custody on October 3. The police have confirmed that the investigation is ongoing and more arrests are possible.

Trichy District Superintendent of Police, Mr. S. Selvanagarathnam, issued a stern warning that strict legal action will be taken against anyone posting or sharing content on social media that incites riots, disrupts public peace, or hurts religious sentiments.

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“I’m Not Responsible”, Bussy Anand Pussies Out In Court For Bail, Makes TVK District Secretary The Scapegoat In Karur Stampede Case

'm Not Responsible Bussy Anand Pussies Out In Court For Bail, Makes TVK District Secretary The Scapegoat In Karur Stampede Case

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court on Friday reserved orders on anticipatory bail pleas filed by Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) functionaries N Anand alias ‘Bussy’ Anand and CTR Nirmal Kumar in connection with the Karur stampede that killed 41 people during the party’s rally on 27 September 2025.

Justice M Jothiraman heard the petitions, where the two leaders face charges under provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (culpable homicide not amounting to murder, attempt to commit culpable homicide, acts endangering life or safety, and disobedience to public order) as well as the Tamil Nadu Public Property (Prevention of Damage and Loss) Act.

Senior counsel V Raghavachari, representing the petitioners, called the case a “concocted one” and argued that no intention could be attributed to them. He said the tragedy was due to police mishandling, not negligence by TVK. He maintained that the authorities had granted permission for the meeting, but the crowd was unexpectedly large. “No policeman was near the crowd… My leader comes at 6 pm, people wanted to see him. I expected police to provide protection,” he said, alleging that police lathi charge and even use of chemicals caused panic.

Justice Senthilkumar questioned both the organisers and the police over responsibility, asking, “As an event organiser, don’t you have any responsibility?” The court expressed anguish over what it described as state leniency towards Vijay and observed that he “vanished” from the spot when the incident occurred.

“I am not the event organiser. The event organiser has been arrested. If any incident takes place at a DMK rally, can the secretary be arrested? I am saying the event was orderly conducted till the police indulged in lathi charge. The entire issue is why do they rope me? The fact that I (referring to Anand) was an ex-MLA or that I am getting support should not be an intimidatory factor before any ruling party,” Raghavachari replied.

He added, “My lordship may grant me (petitioners) protection. I will be before them (police) from morning to the evening. But should I be humiliated like this by making an accused?” The State, meanwhile, asserted that the tragedy that took place because TVK’s leaders behaved irresponsibly.

“As General Secretary, he (Anand) made the request to the media and his cadre that the leader is coming, so the people should be there by 12 o’clock. Has he made a single statement in the media that people should behave responsibly? Not even a single announcement took place that the crowd should stay disciplined. What is the step taken by them? Was there any public announcement by the General Secretary or Join Secretary?” the State counsel contended.

While responding to the Court’s query on whether children and women were part of the crowd which gathered during the rally, the State’s lawyer added, “No arrangements were made for them. Not even a single water bottle was available. Police can’t give drinking water, they (TVK) have to do it. Of course, it is unfortunate incident but these people have not taken care of their own cadres, they absconded from the scene. None of these petitioners were available. Is it expected of the responsible people to do this?”

Additional Advocate General J Ravindran, opposing the pleas, said negligence and recklessness were clear. “We know it is not intentional, that is why we invoked 304 part 2. But these people didn’t care for their own cadres. They absconded while police rescued victims.” He added that TVK failed to provide water or basic amenities, and misleadingly tweeted the rally would start at noon despite permission only from 3 pm to 7 pm.

The AAG said post-mortem reports confirmed deaths were due to dehydration and asphyxia. He stressed that the investigation was at an early stage and the petitioners’ role must be examined, noting 559 police personnel had been deployed compared to 137 for a recent AIADMK rally.

The court also heard petitions for a CBI probe, protocols for rallies, and enhanced victim compensation. It declined a CBI probe, recorded the State’s assurance that no rallies will be allowed on highways until SOPs are framed, and directed the constitution of an SIT led by senior IPS officer Asra Garg.

Justice Jothiraman reserved orders on the anticipatory bail petitions of Anand and Nirmal Kumar.

(With inputs from Live Law)

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

When Cops Rape In Dravidian Model Tamil Nadu, Woke Ultra-Feminist Chinmayi Blames Hinduism

When Cops Rape In Dravidian Model Tamil Nadu, Woke Ultra-Feminist Chinmayi Blames Hinduism

A few days ago, the news of TN police officers sexually assaulting a young woman sent shockwaves across the state. However, instead of questioning the Dravidian Model DMK government and its “fantastic” law and order, woke radical ultra-feminist Chinmayi Sripaada chose to blame, of all things, Hinduism, for the crime.

What Happened?

Two police officers were arrested on 30 September 2025 for the alleged sexual assault of a young woman from Andhra Pradesh in a shocking incident that has sent waves of outrage through the district.

The accused, identified as Sub-Inspector Suresh Raj and Constable Sundar attached to the Tiruvannamalai East Police Station, were taken into custody following a formal complaint by the victim.

According to preliminary reports, the incident occurred on the Enthal Bypass Road where the two officers were stationed for vehicle inspection duty. A small cargo vehicle carrying fruits from Andhra Pradesh, with two sisters as passengers, was stopped for routine inspection.

The police allegedly separated the two siblings during the inspection. In a deeply disturbing turn of events, the officers are accused of taking the women to a nearby grove in the Enthal area where one of them was sexually assaulted in the presence of her sister.

After the alleged assault, the officers reportedly threatened the women before leaving the scene. The victim was subsequently admitted to the Tiruvannamalai Government Medical College Hospital for medical treatment and examination, with additional police security deployed at the facility.

Local authorities have confirmed the arrest of both police personnel and stated that a serious investigation is underway. The police are actively interrogating the accused officers to establish the complete sequence of events and determine the extent of the crime.

Chinmayi’s Rant About Hinduism

Despite knowing that the Dravidian model law and order has deteriorated beyond repair, questioning the ruling DMK government is something the likes of Chinmayi would not do. Here is what she commented about the horrific rape: “The girls were taking harvested banana stalks in a minivan from Andhra Pradesh and got raped by constables in Tamilnadu. Quite telling of our Women-Are-Goddess culture during Navaratri.”

Unfortunately, the gruesome crime took place during the festival of Navaratri, Chinmayi’s focus was on the “patriarchial” nature of the festival and not once on the ruling establishment.

If it was the church that was in question, this was how she would respond – always pontificate about Hinduism and indulge in whataboutery.

Had the tables turned, had the state been Uttar Pradesh where this crime took place, Chinmayi would have gone bonkers. Here is an example of how she writes her comments if the rape occurs in UP.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Communist-Ruled Kerala Has The Highest Crime Rate In India, Uttar Pradesh’s Crime Rate Lesser Than National Average

The National Crime Records Bureau’s (NCRB) “Crime in India 2023” report has revealed stark regional disparities in crime statistics, with Communist-ruled Kerala recording the highest crime rate in the nation while Uttar Pradesh maintained a crime rate significantly lower than the national average.

Kerala registered an alarming 1,631.2 crimes per lakh population, the highest among all states and nearly five times the national average of 335.3. This places the southern state at the top of India’s crime chart, followed closely by Delhi among union territories with 1,602 cases per lakh population.

In contrast, Uttar Pradesh, despite reporting the highest absolute number of crimes against women at 66,381 cases, demonstrated a significantly lower crime rate of 58.6 cases per one lakh female population compared to the national average of 66.2. When considering overall crime metrics, Uttar Pradesh’s crime rate stood at 335.3 per lakh population, well below the national average of 448.3.

The data shows Uttar Pradesh ranked 13th among 28 states when measured by crime rate against women and 17th when compared to all 36 states and union territories combined. Several states reported substantially higher crime rates than Uttar Pradesh, including Telangana (124.9), Rajasthan (114.8), and Haryana (110.3).

Uttar Pradesh’s Director General of Police Rajeev Krishna attributed the state’s relatively better performance to Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath’s zero-tolerance approach to crime. “The high case numbers reflect the size of the state, but the lower crime rate suggests that increased police visibility, targeted safety schemes, and dedicated helplines are mitigating the per-capita risk,” Krishna stated.

The state government credits initiatives like Mission Shakti, which focuses on women’s empowerment and safety through helplines, fast-track complaint redressal, and awareness drives, for the improved metrics. Authorities argue that the relatively lower crime rate also indicates growing confidence among women to report crimes that previously went unregistered.

The NCRB data breakdown shows that most crimes against women in Uttar Pradesh were committed by known individuals, with domestic violence comprising 34% of cases. Other significant categories included assault on women with intent to outrage modesty (20%), rape cases (8%), and cybercrimes against women (9%).

Beyond the Uttar Pradesh-Kerala comparison, the report highlighted concerning trends elsewhere. Delhi recorded a sharp decline in conviction rates, dropping from 87.8% in 2022 to 78.1% in 2023. Bengaluru reported the lowest chargesheeting rate for kidnapping cases among metropolitan cities at just 3.8%, with 1,139 of the 1,203 kidnapping victims being children.

Nationally, the report showed significant improvements in security parameters, with cases of extremist violence dropping sharply from 446 in 2022 to 163 in 2023. Jihadi terrorism cases fell by 87%, while Left-wing extremism declined by over 44% and North-East insurgency by 61%.

The contrasting pictures presented by Kerala’s high crime rate and Uttar Pradesh’s below-average statistics underscore how population scale and regional governance approaches influence crime patterns across India’s diverse states.

(With inputs from VSK Telangana)

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Manchester Court Sentences Seven Men In Rochdale Grooming Gang Case, Ringleader Gets 35 Years

Manchester Court Sentences Seven Men In Rochdale Grooming Gang Case, Ringleader Gets 35 Years
Image Source: Al Jazeera

A court in Manchester, United Kingdom, has sentenced seven men to lengthy prison terms for the sexual grooming – systematic sexual abuse of two teenage girls in Rochdale between 2001 and 2006. The sentencing, delivered on 2 October 2025, marks a significant development in a series of historical child sexual exploitation cases that have plagued the area.

The ringleader, 65-year-old market trader Mohammed Zahid, received the longest sentence of 35 years after being convicted on multiple counts of rape and other sexual offences. The six other convicted men, aged between 39 and 67, were given minimum prison terms ranging from 12 years. The verdict followed a four-month trial that concluded in June.

The court heard that the two victims, who were both 13 years old when the abuse began and did not know each other, were targeted due to their troubled family backgrounds. The perpetrators used a grooming process, luring the girls with gifts, money, and offers of shelter. The abuse escalated as the girls were transported to various locations in Rochdale, plied with alcohol and drugs, and then sexually assaulted by multiple members of the group.

During the three-day sentencing hearing, both victims provided impact statements detailing the profound and lasting damage caused by the abuse. One woman described how the experience had affected every facet of her life, including her physical and mental health and her ability to form relationships. The other victim stated that the abuse had led her to believe, at the time, that all men would expect sex from her, and she courageously urged other survivors to come forward no matter how much time had passed.

This case is part of a wider pattern of historical child sexual exploitation in Rochdale that first came to significant public attention in the early 2010s. Authorities, including the Greater Manchester Police (GMP) and local council, have since acknowledged major failures in protecting the victims. In April 2022, GMP Chief Constable Stephen Watson issued a public apology, admitting the force had been borderline incompetent in its handling of the issue. A government-commissioned report that same year concluded that authorities had failed to act despite warnings and had downplayed the ethnic dimensions of the exploitation.

Estimates from a 2014 report suggested that at least 1,400 children may have been exploited in such cases in Rochdale, with perpetrators primarily identified as being of Pakistani heritage. This aspect has often been central to the toxic public discourse surrounding these crimes, with far-right elements using it to demonize British Asian and Muslim communities.

The issue regained prominence in the UK earlier in 2025 when US tech billionaire Elon Musk used his platform, X, to accuse Prime Minister Keir Starmer of complicity due to his former role as head of the Crown Prosecution Service. The government rejected these allegations. The case was also leveraged by far-right agitator Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, known as Tommy Robinson, who received backing from Musk for his campaigns blaming the UK’s Muslim community and alleging a government cover-up.

Calls for a new national inquiry into so-called “grooming gangs” grew, leading Prime Minister Starmer to reverse his initial position and support such an investigation, stating it would help restore public confidence in the authorities.

A preliminary report released in June 2025 by Baroness Louise Casey highlighted the poor quality of data on the issue, making it difficult to determine if any ethnic group was overrepresented. The report noted that while data on child exploitation suspects shows a disproportion of Asian heritage individuals, data for overall child abuse does not, with white men being the predominant offenders.

Following the report’s findings, the then-Home Secretary Yvette Cooper stated the government had accepted its recommendations, which included strengthening rape laws and enhancing child protection measures. She emphasized in the House of Commons that while more robust data is needed, the findings must not be ignored, as failing to expose these issues allows the crimes of a minority to be used to marginalize entire communities.

(With inputs from Al Jazeera)

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

When Newslaundry Called Dussehra A Festival “Normalizing Violence”

When Newslaundry Called Dussehra A Festival “Normalizing Violence”

In a controversial segment of its September 2023 podcast, leftist portal Newslaundry’s commentators suggested that the Hindu festival of Dussehra “normalizes violence” among children.

In the discussion, Abhinandan Sekhri compared Dussehra to Lohri, noting that while Lohri involves a simple bonfire, Dussehra involves burning humanoid effigies, which they claimed could “normalize” the idea of harming others in a child’s mind.

He said, “You know Dussehra, I think it’s wonderful that… good triumphed over evil or whatever your definition of good or evil is, but just a custom; see I like Lohri because it is just a bonfire. Here the figure is a humanoid, it is a human being and you’re going and setting him on fire and you’re seeing that normalized from a very young age. I think it is normalized in your head. I am not saying you go around burning people but I’m just saying that for a child, telling him that we’re going to celebrate this – what – you see that Uncle with a beard now we’ll go set him on fire. I think as a custom….”

The argument posits that the act of burning a human-like figure could desensitize young minds to violence, blurring the lines between symbolic ritual and real-world action.

While the other panelists called Sekhri’s comment as “overthinking”, it is clear that liberals would go to any extent to derogate and denounce Hindu festivals. If any non-liberal would contest these observations, they would be laughed off as “WhatsApp University” and shamed.

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

DMK Leader Dindigul Leoni Known For Anti-Hindu And Sexist Speeches Faces Boycott From Hindus In Sri Lanka

DMK Leader Dindigul Leoni Known For Anti-Hindu And Sexist Speeches Faces Boycott From Hindus In Sri Lanka

DMK leader and orator Dindigul I. Leoni faced protests from Hindu groups in Sri Lanka following his public speeches, which were described by activists as anti-Hindu. The protests took place in late September 2025, coinciding with Leoni’s series of public appearances and cultural events across the country, including engagements confirmed via social media posts a few days ago.

According to reports, Hindu activists in Colombo alleged that Leoni repeatedly insulted Hinduism and its traditions, criticizing temples, sculptures, and worship practices. One protester, Raju Bhaskaran, who identified himself as a Hindu activist and devotee from Colombo, said that Leoni “comes and criticizes the entire culture of Hindus” and “sows anti-Hindu ideas” in his speeches.

Bhaskaran, speaking at the protest, explained that the activists’ intention was not to disrupt Leoni’s events, but to oppose his views. He stated that Hindus gathered in Sri Lanka to voice their opposition to the anti-Hindu content of Leoni’s speeches, calling for unity among Hindus globally. “All Hindus should fight together. That is why we came to Sri Lanka,” he said, adding that Hindu protests would be directed at Leoni wherever he spoke.

During the protest, Bhaskaran called on Hindus to rise against what he described as Leoni’s insults toward their faith, temples, and worship systems. “Come and whoever speaks against Hindus like this, we will come and fight. He even makes fun of our worship system, our art, our culture, which is more than ten thousand years old, even our temples, even our sculptures. He is making a satire. He is making fun of it,” he said.

The activist emphasized that the protest was focused solely on opposing Leoni’s statements rather than the individual himself. “We are not opposing him, but against his views. In fact, we consider him a good artist. Everyone is welcome. But we are here to raise our voices against his views,” Bhaskaran said, noting that the campaign against his speeches had been ongoing for three months and was visible on social media.

He urged that Leoni and other speakers avoid criticizing Hinduism in the future. “People from one religion criticize another religion, criticize the art, culture, and traditions of another religion, and this is why many problems arise in the country. That is why every religion has its own principles,” he said.

Bhaskaran also highlighted the role of organizations supporting Leoni’s events, such as Five Star Creation, accusing them of facilitating his speeches against Hindu beliefs. “It is time for everyone to think. We need to think about the respect and support given to Hindus by bringing such speakers like the disgraceful Leoni to Sri Lanka. This should be the last time. No one should come after this,” he said.

The protests in Colombo were marked by repeated chants urging Leoni to leave the country. “Let’s protect Hinduism. Leoni, get out. Hindus, we need unity. We all Hindus need unity,” activists reportedly shouted. Bhaskaran described the protests as a collective effort of Hindu youth and community members determined to resist what they termed anti-Hindu rhetoric.

The activists even taunted the people who went to attend the programme.

It is noteworthy that Leoni has made sexist and anti-Hindu speeches aplenty.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“How Many More Days Will Modi Live? He Is Already 75”, Says Telangana Congress MLA Bhupathi Reddy

How Many More Days Will Modi Live? He Is Already 75, Says Telangana Congress MLA Bhupathi Reddy

Bhupathi Reddy, a legislator from the ruling Congress party representing the Nizamabad Rural constituency, has sparked a row with remarks in which he allegedly wished “death” for Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The MLA reportedly commented on the Prime Minister’s lifespan during a program in his constituency about a week ago.

In a video clip shared by BJP leaders on social media on 2 October 2025, Bhupathi Reddy is heard saying in Telugu, “They always say Rama as if Rama were born only because of them. As if they go, Rama too would go. If Modi dies, will Rama cease to exist? How many more days will Modi live? He is already 75 years old.”

The BJP has strongly condemned the remarks, calling them “shocking” and “insensitive.” In a post, the party stated, “Bhagwan Shri Ram is the eternal embodiment of Bharat’s civilisational pride and cultural greatness. The vile and disgraceful remarks of Telangana Congress MLA Bhupati are not an individual outburst but a reflection of Congress’s deep-rooted contempt for Hindu sentiments. By repeatedly attacking Bhagwan Shri Ram and ridiculing the faith of crores of Indians, Congress exposes its anti-Hindu mindset and its politics of appeasement.”

The post added: “Let’s unite and fight against Congress’s divisive and destructive agenda in Telangana and across Bharat.”

Telangana BJP spokesperson Rachna Reddy commented that the MLA’s remarks reflect the frustration of the Congress party.

Bhupathi Reddy has previously courted controversy for using abusive language against actor Allu Arjun and warning that he would not tolerate criticism of the state government or Chief Minister Revanth Reddy.

(With inputs from Zee News)

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

When Pro-Hamas UK Home Secretary Shabana Mahmud Said “Islam Is The Absolute Driver Of Everything That I Do”

When Pro-Hamas UK Home Secretary Shabana Mahmud Said "Islam Is The Absolute Driver Of Everything That I Do"

On 2 October 2025, on the holiest day for Jews – Yom Kippur, a terror attack took place at a synagogue in Manchester, UK killing two and injuring several others.

Speaking after inspecting the scene of Thursday’s terror attack at the Heaton Park Hebrew Congregation synagogue in Crumpsall, Manchester, Home Secretary Shabana Mahmud expressed horror at the antisemitic assault that left two dead and three injured.

“I am horrified by the antisemitic terrorist attack at a synagogue on the holiest day in the Jewish calendar. My prayers are with the victims and the families of all of those who are murdered here today,” Mahmud said. “I want to thank the police and all of the emergency services for the speed of their response and also for their considerable bravery. The government has stepped up security at synagogues across the whole of the country and we will do whatever is required to keep our Jewish community safe. I know that there are many questions that are still to be answered and rest assured they will be answered as quickly as possible. It will just take a little time for us to establish exactly what has happened here. But we will share more information as soon as we are able. What I do want to say is to those who seek to divide us, they will fail. Thank you.”

Had Waxed Eloquent About “Islam Being Her Driver”

Mahmud’s response comes amid growing scrutiny over her record and recent appointment as the UK’s first Muslim Home Secretary. Earlier, she openly discussed the central role of her faith in her life.

In a viral video, she said, “Islam is my religion and like lot of practicing Muslims, my faith is the most important thing in my life. It is the absolute driver of everything that I do. I feel a very strong calling of my own conscience and my conscience calls me to God… “

In an interview back in 2024, she said, “My faith is the core of who I am. It is the part of me that remains when all else is gone. I would see it as the central truth of who I am as a person. It shapes my life and my views and how I think about the world and my role and my place in it. My faith calls me to public service. The fundamental values of my faith around decency and fairness, not wanting to live in a society where there’s conflict, those fundamental drivers I get from my faith. Others would get them from other places but for me, they’re shaped by the fact that I’m a Muslim.”

The interview revealed that her office in the Ministry of Justice, where she served as Justice Secretary and Lord Chancellor before being promoted to Home Secretary, was adorned with photos of the three holiest sites in Islam, a framed declaration of faith in Quranic Arabic, and a Union Jack. Mahmoud also wore a necklace reading “Allah” during the interview.

Mahmud’s critics have argued that her religious devotion and past political stances could influence her impartiality on issues of national security, immigration, and policing. Opponents cite her history of supporting pro-Palestinian positions, including backing the boycott, divestment, and sanctions movement against Israel, advocating for Kashmiri independence, opposing deportation of foreign criminals, and challenging the citizenship revocation of Shamima Begum.

From Justice Secretary To Home Secretary, Pro-Hamas/Anti-Israel Stand

Her tenure as Justice Secretary from July 2024 to September 2025 drew further criticism. During this period, she oversaw early release schemes for over a thousand prisoners to address overcrowding, a move marred by administrative errors and labeled by some as a setback to public safety. She also expanded legal aid for asylum seekers and immigrants contesting deportation by 10%, which opponents argue prioritised non-citizens at taxpayers’ expense. Softer sentencing guidelines for non-white British offenders and hesitation to prosecute social media offenses have also been cited as evidence of potential bias.

Mahmud was appointed Home Secretary in early September 2025, replacing a cabinet reshuffle following Angela Rayner’s resignation. Her promotion came amid escalating challenges including record small-boat migrant arrivals and growing concerns about Islamist extremism in the UK. Commentators had warned that her activist background, combined with a pro-Hamas stance and controversial positions on foreign policy, may compromise her ability to act decisively on immigration, counterterrorism, and law and order.

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.