Home Blog Page 76

DMK Govt Refused To Implement Court Order For Thiruparankundram Deepam But Shows No Hesitation To Enforce Orders To Demolish Temples

When DMK scion Udhayanidhi Stalin called for the “eradication of Sanatana Dharma,” it signalled an ideological position. What is now visible is how that position reflects in governance—particularly in how the state responds to court orders involving Hindu religious practices versus other cases.

The Thiruparankundram Karthigai Deepam issue is not an isolated incident. It fits into a broader pattern of selective enforcement.

A High Court order permitted the lighting of the Deepam at the Deepa Thoon. Under the Constitution, the executive is duty-bound to implement judicial directions. This is not optional—it is central to the rule of law.

Yet, the order did not translate into immediate action on the ground.

Historical records show that a 1996 agreement relating to the Thiruparankundram hill recorded no objection to Hindu religious practices. Despite this, the state has allowed shifts in usage and narrative around the site without intervention.

In Nellikuppam, public statements regarding animal slaughter saw no administrative response. Only after devotees approached the court did a restraining order emerge in October 2025. The court itself recorded that the state had not objected.

Now examine enforcement in temple demolition cases.

The former BJP state chief alleged that since the DMK came to power on 6 May 2021, more than 161 Hindu temples across Tamil Nadu had been demolished. He cited locations including Muthaanamman Temple in Coimbatore city, Vedavinayagar Temple on Mint Road in Chennai, Vasudevar Temple in Sulur, Kubera Vinayagar Temple in Thanjavur, Adi Mariamman Temple in the Keezhavasal area, Shani Bhagavan Temple in Ariyalur district, and temples in Mettupalayam, Tiruvallur, and Perambur.

Annamalai questioned the basis on which several of these demolitions were carried out, stating that in many cases there were no clear court orders or documented sources authorising the action. He alleged that in some instances, court orders were cited after the fact, and that temples were demolished within hours of judgments being delivered, including demolitions carried out in the early hours of the morning.

Case Pattern: Caution in Non-Temple Structures

In contrast, multiple cases involving mosques, churches, or waqf-linked properties show a different administrative approach—marked by delay, caution, or deferment.

1. Avadi–Pattabiram Belt (Chennai outskirts)

Encroachments involving religious structures, including non-temple sites flagged on government land, have seen prolonged inaction despite complaints and local-level directives. Authorities have repeatedly cited “sensitivity” and law-and-order concerns.

2. Chromepet Church

In 2023, the Madras High Court directed that the India Evangelical Church, located on Hasthinapuram Rajendra Prasad Road in Annanagar, Chrompet be demolished.

The administration challenged this before the Supreme Court, but the appeal was dismissed, leaving the High Court’s demolition order intact.

Since the building remained standing, a contempt petition was later filed. Hearing the matter urgently, the High Court’s writ division bench ordered that the church must be completely demolished by 5 December 2025, warning that if the directive was not carried out, the CMDA Secretary and the Tambaram Corporation Commissioner would be required to appear in person on 8 December 2025.

However, demolition efforts have been stalled due to protests.

2. Vellore & Ranipet District Clusters

Highways and PWD land encroachments involving religious structures have seen staggered enforcement. In several instances, removal drives have been paused or modified after representations, unlike the swift clearance seen in temple cases.

3. Waqf Land Disputes (Statewide)

Disputes involving Tamil Nadu Waqf Board properties frequently enter prolonged legal-administrative cycles. Even where encroachments are acknowledged, resolution is often delayed through negotiations, status quo orders, or extended proceedings rather than immediate enforcement.

4. Tiruchirappalli & Delta Districts

Encroachments involving non-temple religious structures on public land have seen phased or partial action, often spaced over months, citing local tensions.

The Contrast Is Structural

  • Temple cases: Immediate action, rapid demolition
  • Other cases: Delay, negotiation, caution

Article 14 does not permit such selective application of the law. If encroachment is illegal, it must be treated uniformly, irrespective of religion. The response in Madurai during the Deepam issue further reinforces this pattern, with heavy police deployment, arrests, and disruption of normal life, indicating a shift from facilitating compliance with a court order to controlling the situation. The original demand at Thiruparankundram was limited—it did not challenge ownership of the hilltop dargah or reopen settled claims, but merely sought permission to light the Karthigai Deepam at the Deepa Thoon below the hill. Even this required judicial intervention, and even after judicial approval, implementation did not follow.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

What The Wikileaks Cables Reveal About MK Stalin

mk stalin wikileaks

A 2009 U.S. diplomatic cable released by WikiLeaks portrayed then Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M. Karunanidhi as tightening his family’s grip over the DMK after the party’s strong national election performance, while clearly signaling that his son MK Stalin was the chosen political heir. The cable, sent from the U.S. Consulate in Chennai on 9 July 2009, said Karunanidhi elevated Stalin as Deputy Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu and simultaneously placed his elder son M.K. Azhagiri in the Union Cabinet, in what American diplomats read as an attempt to manage succession while balancing competing family factions.

Heir Apparent

The document said the dual move was intended to avoid an open power struggle within the first family but predicted that Karunanidhi’s eventual exit from politics would still weaken the DMK because, in the consulate’s assessment, neither Stalin nor Azhagiri could match their father’s political skill or public command. The cable described Stalin as the “heir apparent” and said his appointment reinforced what was already widely understood inside Tamil Nadu politics: Karunanidhi wanted him to succeed both as DMK chief and as Chief Minister.

Rise Of MK Stalin

According to the cable, Stalin had been active in the DMK since the 1970s, beginning with organizational work in the party’s youth wing. It said he gained statewide recognition after being jailed during the Emergency between 1976 and 1977 under the Maintenance of Internal Security Act alongside other political leaders, an episode the diplomats presented as part of his rise in public visibility.

Thuggish Reputation, Involvement In Sex Scandals

The most controversial portion of the cable concerned Stalin’s early reputation. The consulate wrote that Stalin had “something of a thuggish reputation” in the 1970s and referred to alleged involvement in multiple sex scandals, while also noting that some of the stories circulating in Chennai might be “apocryphal.” The cable specifically cited stories told by local people about young women allegedly being picked up off the streets and handed over to Stalin “for his amusement,” but the document did not present documentary proof for these allegations and framed them as part of Chennai political gossip and rumor.

The cable then contrasted that alleged early image with a later political transformation. It said Stalin matured in the late 1980s, shed the earlier reputation, and evolved into what the diplomats called a genuinely popular politician. It listed his electoral and administrative credentials in detail, saying he had won election to the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly four times by 2009 – in 1989, 1996, 2001 and 2006 and had served as Mayor of Chennai from 1996 to 2002. It also noted that he was Minister for Local Administration and Rural Development from 2006 until his elevation as Deputy Chief Minister in 2009.

Rivalry With Azhagiri

The cable argued that Stalin’s rise could not be understood apart from his rivalry with his elder brother Azhagiri, which it described as “legendary” in Tamil Nadu politics. It said Karunanidhi had sent Azhagiri to Madurai in 1989 partly to avoid clashes between the brothers, effectively dividing the family’s political geography between the Chennai-centered Stalin and the southern district strongman Azhagiri.

On Azhagiri, the cable was especially severe. It said he controlled the DMK’s operations in southern Tamil Nadu for years without holding a formal party post and accused him of destabilizing the party during Karunanidhi’s earlier tenure as Chief Minister. It further said that Azhagiri had allegedly worked against several DMK candidates in the 2001 Assembly election, contributing to the party’s defeat.

Family-Centric Power Structure

The cable also described the wider family arrangement around Karunanidhi. It said he had children through different relationships and characterized Rajathi as an “unofficial wife,” with whom he had Kanimozhi, while Dayalu was described as his second wife and the mother of Stalin, Azhagiri, Tamilarasu and Selvi. The document said Kanimozhi was disappointed at being excluded from the Union Cabinet despite lobbying by her supporters, and that sources close to her told U.S. diplomats she expected a compensatory promotion within the party.

Stalin Lacked Charisma, Had Poor Health

On Stalin specifically, the cable mixed political praise with personal skepticism. It said Stalin lacked charisma but compensated through hard work and a willingness to listen to trusted bureaucrats and senior party leaders. In the diplomats’ final judgment, that made him more acceptable than Azhagiri, whom they described as volatile, pugnacious and rough-hewn. For that reason, the cable predicted Stalin would likely prevail in any eventual succession struggle.

At the same time, the cable expressed uncertainty about Stalin’s health in 2009. It said rumors were circulating that he was suffering from an undisclosed ailment, allegedly intestinal cancer, and noted that he had reportedly visited London in June 2008 for a medical examination. The document did not provide proof of illness and clearly framed this as rumor and source-based reporting rather than established fact.

The consulate’s closing assessment was blunt. It said Karunanidhi’s effort to divide political turf between Stalin and Azhagiri would probably fail in the long run, because Azhagiri would eventually seek power in Tamil Nadu after Karunanidhi’s exit, bringing him into conflict with Stalin. Even so, the cable concluded that Stalin was better placed to emerge on top because he was more broadly acceptable than his brother.

In its final line of analysis, the cable argued that even if Stalin eventually succeeded, neither he nor Azhagiri had the political acumen or rhetorical skill to replace Karunanidhi. The U.S. diplomats predicted that the DMK would face difficult times whenever Karunanidhi finally left politics. That judgment, recorded in July 2009, now stands as a snapshot of how American officials in Chennai viewed Stalin at a critical moment in the transfer of power within the DMK.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

DMK’s Ezhilan Naganathan Peddles Lies About Delimitation During Campaign

DMK's Ezhilan Naganathan Peddles Lies About Delimitation During Campaign

DMK’s Thousand Lights constituency candidate Ezhilan Naganathan peddled lies during his campaign speech in the Ilango Salai locality. He pushed the Dravidianist north-south divide and lies about the delimitation.

Addressing the gathering he said, “Dear people gathered here at 118, Ilango Salai, along with our area secretary brother MP Anbudurai and this crowd in Ilango Salai, in his stronghold, today we are engaged in this vote-seeking campaign. This is the final phase, the last stage; we are nearing the climax. On April 23, on election day, in the voting machine, number one will be Ezhilan Naganathan, and there will be the Rising Sun symbol. Stamp on that, because the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam is number one, Tamil Nadu is number one, the Dravidian model Chief Minister is number one, and Chief Minister Muthuvel Karunanidhi Stalin is number one. Today, the number one Chief Minister protecting India is our Chief Minister. Today, the terrible BJP government plotted to reduce the representation of our southern states. Will only North India take away our taxes? Will only North India get votes and increase their number of parliamentary seats? The only Chief Minister who stopped this was our Tamil Nadu Chief Minister. No one else stopped it. He is the real hero, the real protagonist, the hero who protects the rights of Tamils, the hero who protected social justice.”

Targeting Vijay, he said, “I am the great-grandson of Cuddalore Anjalai Ammal. Looking at the ideological courage of my great grandmother’s, you do not speak Anjalai Ammal’s ideology, you do not speak Periyar’s ideology, and you also do not speak Ambedkar’s ideology. What you are speaking is cinema, creating wrong guidance for the youth. They stage drama, they act, they whistle, they will come and go. But I say this standing in Ilango Salai, from MM Garden Road, from Pillaiyar Koil Lane, from our brother’s Varadarajapettai: when a problem comes, the only party that stands by people is the DMK. Whether we are in power or not, we are the only ones who solve problems.”

He continued, “We studied this area. We examined what unresolved problem had remained here for 50 years. We laid new drainage channels in every street where there were old water canals. We laid new stormwater drains too. On the main roads where such facilities did not exist, after the election we will complete the long-pending work and provide road facilities. There are many issues here. After resolving the patta problem, once the election is over, we will come back in a victory function and distribute pattas to the people. At Varadarajapettai, we installed a new transformer and solved the electricity problem. If people here have any house-related issue, the one heart that trembles for them is Anbu. He would immediately call and say, ‘Doctor, this problem here has not been solved, there is a problem in this house, a problem in that house.’ When we come seeking votes for our brother, we come to every house with a sense of rightful closeness, because our dear brother has worked here. When he was zone chairman and when he was councillor here, he got pattas for the people, created road facilities, and the one reason homes are comfortable today is that this man standing here labored for it. So, in this Ilango Salai, where Anna Arivalayam stands, the Ilango Salai that is protected by Anna Arivalayam, I come here asking for your vote. Likewise, the only Chief Minister who protects the borders of Tamil Nadu like a guardian deity is our Tamil Nadu Chief Minister. His victory is not just the victory of an MLA like Ezhilan from Thousand Lights. Our victory is the victory of protecting Tamil Nadu. Our victory is the victory that will protect Tamil Nadu and raise the women’s rights assistance from ₹1,000 to ₹2,000. Our victory is the victory that will give an ₹8,000 coupon to every homemaker. Our victory is the victory that will raise Pudhumai Penn from ₹1,000 to ₹1,500. Our victory is the victory that will raise Tamil Pudhalvan from ₹1,000 to ₹1,500. The only party with the strength to do all this and ask for votes based on work done is the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam.”

He further said, “From 2011 to 2014, when the so-called double-engine setup existed and Valarmathi akka was a minister here, what exactly did she do for this area? I will tell you. Here, we changed the pipes in this locality, solved the power-cut problem, solved the sewage pipeline issue, addressed the patta issue, installed the transformer to fix the electricity problem, built a gym here, built the toilet here, and completed all these works. Having done all this, I have come to ask for your vote with rightful confidence. Vote on April 23. Vote for the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam. Vote for the Rising Sun. Number one state is Tamil Nadu. Tamil Nadu will win; Tamil Nadu will fight. Say it: Tamil Nadu will win, Tamil Nadu will fight. Tamil Nadu will win, Tamil Nadu will fight. Long live the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam. Long live the Rising Sun.”

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“Why Send Your ‘Slave’ From Karur To Coimbatore?”, TVK Vijay Takes A Swipe At DMK & Senthil Balaji

“Why Send Your ‘Slave’ From Karur To Coimbatore?” Vijay Takes A Swipe At DMK & Senthil Balaji

TVK chief Joseph Vijay took a direct swipe at DMK’s Senthil Balaji during his address in South Chennai.

He was meeting his cadre and addressed the gathering.

He said, “The whole world was watching live how I came from the people to Karur, how quickly I came there, and shamelessly you are placing the blame on me. Don’t you have no conscience? Fine, let us say you did nothing at all, sir. Then why, sir, did you make one of your slaves, someone who had contested only in Karur, only in the Karur region, for 20 years, run all the way to Coimbatore?”

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by Dinamalar (@dinamalardaily)

It is noteworthy that Senthil Balaji who had for long contested only in Karur is now contesting from Coimbatore South constituency. Also, the Karur stampede during Vijay’s rally back in September 2025 that killed 41 including children occurred in the same town. The two blamed each other for the tragedy.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Kerala Woman Who Opposed Krishna Meat Vishu Poster Alleges Death Threats, Says She Fears ‘TJ Joseph-Type Attack’ After Social Media Abuse

Kerala Woman Who Opposed Krishna Meat Vishu Poster Alleges Death Threats, Says She Fears ‘TJ Joseph-Type Attack’ After Social Media Abuse

A woman from Kerala who had first raised objections to a Vishu advertisement by the Cherthala-based Mehr Mandi & Grills has now come forward publicly, alleging that she has been subjected to threats and online abuse following her remarks.

Speaking in an interview to Janam TV, the woman described the situation as distressing and said she now fears for her personal safety. She stated that she was particularly alarmed by the nature of the messages she received and expressed concern that something similar to the TJ Joseph hand-chopping case could happen to her.

During the interview, she recounted how the episode began after she reacted to social media posts related to the advertisement.

She said, “It was only yesterday that I came to know about this issue. As a Hindu believer, and even more as a devotee of Krishna, I felt deeply hurt. When I saw posts showing Krishna eating beef, Krishna eating chicken, Krishna eating mandi, I felt very upset as a believer. About that, I uploaded a post on Twitter. The comments under that post against me honestly frightened me. If I had been in Kerala, I might have faced something similar to what happened to Joseph teacher. I feel fortunate that I was outside Kerala. That is how vile it was under my Twitter post. They took the photo I had uploaded for Vishu along with my own photo and wrote: ‘I will come to your house, and when I come there, I will give you the answer for this.’ They also insulted my family, abused us in a filthy manner, and posted very dirty accusations and insults. In addition, they used threatening language like, ‘We will come to your house and give you the answer for this.’ It came from an account based in Saudi Arabia, from a Malayali there. For someone to send such religiously threatening messages from a country with so many restrictions and rules, that too to an account here, and to justify it in many places across Kerala…”

The host then asked whether she had approached the police regarding the threats.

She said, “As soon as they saw that post, they kept going through my old posts and commenting abusively under all of them. At that point, I tagged the Saudi Twitter account and also Kerala Police and uploaded a post. Other than that, I have not directly gone for any separate legal action. That is what I said, if I had been in Kerala, I would have been there with great anxiety. Because of this, within just one day, I faced a lot of trouble on Twitter. Under many old posts too, there were severe insults, abuse, and comments so vulgar that they cannot even be spoken aloud. I do not understand why they are doing this or what exactly they intend by it. If it were just one person from Kerala, there might be some way to explain it. But this was done in eight or ten similar patterns, even using slipper images and such things. So there seems to be an organized mafia behind this. Someone may have given them a quotation to do this. Otherwise, what else are we supposed to call this?”

The host concluded the interaction by encouraging her to remain strong and thanking her for speaking on the issue.

These are the comments that were posted to her.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Red Giant Movies Investment Of ₹7.36 Crore Disclosed In 2021 Missing From Udhayanidhi Stalin’s 2026 Affidavit, IT Dept Tells Madras High Court

udhayanidhi stalin red giant

The Madras High Court has been informed by the Income Tax Department of discrepancies in the financial disclosures of Udhayanidhi Stalin across his election affidavits filed in 2021 and 2026, as reported in Bar and Bench.

In a counter-affidavit submitted before the Court, the Department stated that an investment of ₹7.36 crore in Red Giant Movies, which was disclosed by Stalin in his 2021 affidavit, is missing from his 2026 election affidavit. At the same time, the 2026 affidavit reflects an investment of ₹2.63 crore in the same company in the name of his spouse, which had not been disclosed earlier.

The affidavit, filed on behalf of the Director General of Income Tax (Investigation), Tamil Nadu and Puducherry, pointed to inconsistencies across election affidavits and financial records. It noted that “no conclusive finding can be made at this stage.”

The Department also flagged discrepancies relating to loan disclosures. While the 2026 affidavit mentions loans amounting to ₹10 crore, the 2021 affidavit had recorded approximately ₹11.06 crore. However, company financial statements indicate borrowings of around ₹17.69 crore. The Department informed the Court that it is unable to determine the exact figures in the absence of complete records.

Further, the Department highlighted that the income tax returns were filed using the ITR-2 format, which does not require submission of a balance sheet. As a result, the investments declared in the affidavits cannot be independently verified.

It also noted that certain key records are not readily available. According to the filing, audited financial statements for some entities are missing, and Stalin’s spouse has not filed Income Tax returns for the relevant assessment year.

The response was filed in connection with a plea submitted by R Kumaravel, a Chennai resident and voter from the Chepauk–Thiruvallikeni constituency, who sought a probe into alleged discrepancies in the assets declared by Udhayanidhi Stalin in his election affidavits for the 2021 Assembly elections and the upcoming 2026 polls.

According to the plea, a comparative analysis of the affidavits filed in 2021 and 2026, when read alongside records maintained by statutory authorities and corporate filings, revealed “material discrepancies” in disclosures. The petitioner alleged disappearance of previously declared assets, unexplained variations in loan figures, contradictions between affidavit disclosures and corporate records, and mischaracterisation of financial transactions.

In his 2026 election affidavit, Stalin has declared total assets of approximately ₹20.6 crore, including ₹12.9 crore in movable assets and ₹7.7 crore in immovable assets. His disclosed income for the financial year 2024–25 stands at ₹10.4 lakh, while his spouse has reported income exceeding ₹2.9 crore.

On 15 April 2026, the Madras High Court issued notice and sought a response from the Income Tax Department in the matter. The case has since been adjourned by four weeks.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

DMK’s Ezhilan Who Once Rebuked Rajini And Kamal Is Today Seeking Their Support For Election

“Let’s Ask Kamal Haasan Five Questions”, DMK Leader Ezhilan’s Old Speech Resurfaces As Stooge Kamal Haasan Campaigns For The Party

Once upon a time, the Makkal Needhi Maiam launched by actor Kamal Haasan, opposed the DMK tooth and nail. However, in 2024, the party finally joined hands with the DMK to oppose ‘communal’ forces.

Today, the same Kamal Haasan, who wanted to uproot the DMK, is campaigning for the party to win in the 2026 Assembly elections.

A resurfaced speech by Dr. Ezhilan Naganathan, the Thousand Lights constituency candidate, from a time when the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam and Makkal Needhi Maiam were political rivals is now drawing sharp criticism for its tone and content, particularly in the context of today’s alliance between the two parties.

In the speech, Ezhilan launches into an aggressive and at times mocking line of questioning directed at Kamal Haasan, challenging him on issues ranging from reservation and federalism to temple administration and nuclear projects, while also mocking Rajinikanth. The phrasing along with the sarcastic framing of Kamal Haasan as an “intellectual,” was derisive rather than substantive.

In the video, he is seen saying, “Let’s ask Rajinikanth and Kamal Haasan five questions. Hello Mr. Kamal Haasan, what do you think about reservation? We should speak to him in English today. How long should reservation continue? What do you think about the creamy layer in reservation? Kamal Haasan, please answer. Let’s see whether Kamal Haasan will answer openly and directly. Kamal Haasan, what is your opinion on financial sovereignty? They are almost snatching away all our industries, and taking away our state’s rights. Are health and education in the Concurrent List or the State List? Is anyone questioning this? We are speaking to Kamal Haasan as an intellectual – should we ask him or not? Should we ask him or not? How many times have commission reports on state autonomy gone from this state to the Centre up to now? What is your opinion on those commission reports? Should we ask or not? Should we ask or not? Also, on the nuclear projects happening here, including the Kudankulam nuclear project, what is the economic viability? What is the environmental stability? What is your opinion on that? Kamal Haasan, are you yes or no on it? Should we ask or not? We cannot ask Rajinikanth; he is on another level. We should ask him. And what we should ask is: what is your opinion on the HR&CE department? What is your opinion on the HR&CE department started by the Justice Party? Why was the HR&CE department started? To protect temples from whom was it started? Here, regarding temple lands that our kings gave in charity, what is your plan to return temple land to ordinary people, poor people, and your fans? Should we ask spiritual questions or not? We should ask, we should ask — they have done all this.”

What is now being questioned is not merely the political shift, but the stark contrast between past rhetoric and present conduct. With Kamal Haasan currently campaigning for the DMK as an ally, the speech has been called out as politically tasteless, raising uncomfortable questions about credibility, consistency, and whether such rhetoric was ever grounded in principle to begin with.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Madras High Court Stays Proceedings Against Annamalai’s Muthuramalinga Thevar Vs Annadurai Remark Controversy

Madras High Court Stays Proceedings Against Annamalai In Thevar Remark Controversy

The Madras High Court on Monday, 20 April 2026, stayed further proceedings against BJP leader K Annamalai in a criminal case arising out of his remarks quoting freedom fighter Muthuramalingam Thevar, as reported in Bar and Bench.

Justice M. Nirmal Kumar passed the interim order while hearing a petition filed by Annamalai challenging a Salem court’s decision to take cognisance of a private complaint lodged against him in the case titled K Annamalai vs Piyush.

The case originates from a speech delivered by Annamalai in which he referred to a 1956 incident at the Meenakshi Amman Temple. In the speech, he allegedly stated that Thevar had warned of a “blood abhishekam” if non-believers clashed with believers.

The complaint was filed in 2023 by an individual identified as Piyush, who contended that the claim made by Annamalai was false. The complainant argued that such remarks had the potential to provoke enmity between believers and non-believers and could disturb public tranquillity.

While taking cognisance of the complaint, the Salem Magistrate examined a video recording of the speech and observed that the remarks were not casual in nature. The Magistrate further held that the statements could promote enmity between different groups and create fear and hostility within society. The court also noted that Annamalai, being a public figure, had a higher responsibility to maintain communal harmony.

Based on these observations, the Magistrate took cognisance of offences under Sections 153A (promoting enmity between groups) and 505 (statements conducing to public mischief) of the Indian Penal Code and issued summons to Annamalai.

Challenging this order, Annamalai approached the High Court seeking relief. The High Court has now stayed the proceedings before the trial court.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Is TVK Candidate Srinath A Converted Christian? Did Joseph Vijay Give Thoothukudi Seat Because Of That?

Is TVK Candidate Srinath A Converted Christian? Did Joseph Vijay Give Thoothukudi Seat Because Of That?

TVK’s Thoothukudi decision has triggered a question the party cannot brush aside: was this seat given on political merit, or on personal proximity to Joseph Vijay or has it got to do something with religion? It is reported that Srinath was fielded from Thoothukudi while Ajitha Agnel, a local functionary who had been aspiring for the constituency, was passed over, setting off anger and visible dissent among sections of the party base.

That is not a small issue in a party that claims to represent a new political culture. When a leader launches a party on the promise of clean internal politics, cadre respect, and a break from old-party favoritism, every candidate selection becomes a test of that promise. In Thoothukudi, that test appears to have produced more resentment than confidence.

The Friendship Factor

One of the politically damaging part of this controversy is that the “friendship angle” is not an invention of rivals. Reports repeatedly describe Srinath as Vijay’s long-time and close friend, and that the bond stretches back around 30 years to Vijay’s early film career. Other reports indicate that Vijay introduced Srinath in a way that underscored personal trust and closeness, which only deepened the perception that this was not a neutral selection.

That matters because public perception in politics is shaped less by internal explanations and more by visible signals. Once the candidate is widely seen as “the leader’s friend,” the burden shifts to the party to prove that the choice was based on organisation, electability, local work, caste arithmetic, coalition strategy, or constituency-level data.

Ajitha’s Bypass

Ajitha Agnel was not some random outsider suddenly claiming entitlement. Reports indicate she had already built a profile inside TVK’s Thoothukudi structure and had openly sought a stronger role in the district, with her frustration surfacing well before the candidate list was announced. Her supporters appear to have viewed her as someone who had put in groundwork and expected either recognition or advancement within the party.

That background is what makes the Srinath selection politically explosive. To cadres, it can look less like strategic deployment and more like a message from the top: long-term local work may still lose out to personal access to the leader. For a newcomer party trying to build district-level loyalty, that is a dangerous impression to create.

Christianity In The Mix?

There are unconfirmed reports that Srinath is reportedly a Christian and his father was a missionary in Africa. It is noteworthy that Thoothukudi has a strong diocese. How else would it make sense that Srinath, a Hindu, be fielded in a such a demographic?

While both Ajitha and Srinath are reportedly from the same fisherman community, Srinath’s father being a missionary seems to have tilted the scales in his favour. This seems to prove that the Christianness of Srinath did give way to his candidacy in Thoothukudi over Ajitha; the closeness of Srinath and Joseph Vijay is an added factor that could have cemented the choice.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

‘I Am Havent Seen’ – DMK Supporter & Wannabe Steve Jobs Suresh Sambandam Exposes His Dravidian Model English

suresh sambandam kissflow

Dravidianist DMK Supporter and wannabe Steve Jobs, Suresh Sambandam, Founder and CEO of Kissflow, a SaaS company, took to X on 20 April 2026 to deliver a verdict on the TVK manifesto. His opening line: “I am havent seen anything this absurd.”

Read it again. Slowly.

This is not a typo. This is not autocorrect. This is a fully constructed, confidently published English sentence from the CEO of a software company that reportedly sells its product to clients in 160 countries as claimed on their website, in English.

The Irony Is the Point

Suresh Sambandam does not operate in a political vacuum. He is firmly embedded in Tamil Nadu’s Dravidian cultural ecosystem – the same ecosystem whose foundational promise to Tamil people is this: English is your liberation. English is the shield. English is what separates progressive, modern Tamil Nadu from the Hindi-imposing North. Generations of Tamil children were pushed into English medium schools on the strength of that promise.

And the CEO who benefits from that ecosystem, who built a global SaaS company in that environment, who publicly lectures on party manifestos, writes “I am haven’t seen.”

Tamil Nadu got the ideology. It got the English-medium policy. It got the government orders blocking Hindi. What it did not get, evidently, was someone to teach Suresh Sambandam the difference between “I haven’t seen” and “I am haven’t seen.”

That is the Dravidian Model English – loud, proud, and thoroughly unedited.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.