Home Blog Page 67

Hindu Munnani Files Complaint Against Alleged Illegal Church Construction On Adi Dravidar Land In Coimbatore

Hindu Munnani Files Complaint Against Alleged Illegal Church Construction On Adi Dravidar Land In Coimbatore

The Hindu Munnani has petitioned the Coimbatore District Collector, alleging that a CSI Christ Church in Keeranatham Village has been illegally constructed on government land designated for Adi Dravidars using a fraudulent land title document (patta).

In a formal complaint dated 13 October 2025, R.V. Jeevanandam, the District Secretary of the Hindu Munnani, has called for the immediate cancellation of Patta No. 673 for Survey Field No. 197 in Annur Keeranatham, claiming it is “illegally obtained” and fake.

The complaint alleges that the church building was erected without obtaining necessary building permits or permission from the District Collector for worship. A significant point of contention is the alleged encroachment onto a public road for the construction of a compound wall, a matter for which a police complaint has already been filed, temporarily halting work.

The Hindu Munnani asserts that despite continuous complaints and ongoing investigations by the Revenue Department since 2020, the illegal construction has persisted. The complaint details that work has often proceeded at night and on weekends, leading to a specific police complaint (CSR No. 148/2023) at the Kovilpalayam Police Station.

Crucially, information obtained through the Right to Information (RTI) Act from the Taluk Office is cited as evidence. According to the the complaint as per official records, SF No. 197 is classified as “Adidravidar Natham”.

The complainant has submitted numerous documents to the Collector, including copies of the disputed patta, RTI replies, the road scale map, and various complaint acknowledgements from police and revenue officials over the past several years.

The Hindu Munnani has urgently requested the District Collector to investigate the matter, cancel the fraudulent patta, and ensure the land is restored for the use of Adi Dravidars to prevent further complications.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

DMK’s Dravidian Model: Oppose CBI Enquiry When In Power, Call For CBI Enquiry When In Opposition

Investigation into the Karur stampede which killed 41 people on 27 September 2025 during a TVK rally has been handed over to the CBI as per the recent Supreme Court order.

Despite demands for an impartial probe from grieving families and political parties, the ruling DMK initially resisted a CBI investigation, insisting on state-appointed mechanisms, criticized as fear of independent scrutiny. With the apex court now placing the case under CBI supervision monitored by a retired Supreme Court judge, it is worth examining instances where the DMK’s demand for CBI probes has shifted depending on whether it was in power or in opposition.

When In Opposition, Demand CBI Enquiry

During the AIADMK regime (2011-2021), the DMK, as the principal opposition party, consistently demanded CBI investigations into numerous cases involving alleged corruption, administrative failures, and custodial violence. MK Stalin, as Opposition Leader, repeatedly called for central agency probes, positioning himself as an advocate for transparent investigations. Here is a comprehensive list of cases where DMK demanded CBI enquiry:

Gutka Scam (2017-2018)

The Madras High Court ordered a CBI probe on 25 April 2018, into the multi-crore gutka scam following a petition by DMK MLA J. Anbazhagan. MK Stalin, as Opposition Leader, strongly welcomed the court order and demanded the resignation of Health Minister C. Vijaya Baskar and DGP T.K. Rajendran for a fair probe. Stalin stated, “If the case has to be probed fairly, health minister C Vijaya Baskar and director general of police T K Rajendran must resign. In fact, we demand the resignation of the Palaniswami government”. He further said the public was aware about the gutka case and the high court had transferred it to CBI as it felt that probe by the DVAC would not be fair. After CBI raids in September 2018, Stalin demanded that the Governor sack the Health Minister and DGP if they did not quit on their own. He questioned why these officials had not been arrested while the bribe-giver and intermediaries were arrested by CBI.

Thoothukudi (Sterlite) Police Firing (2018)

On 29 May 2018, following the police firing that killed 13 protesters at the anti-Sterlite agitation, Stalin demanded action against senior police officials. DMK wrote to the Chief Secretary on 29 May 2018, demanding a CBI probe into the police firing.
Stalin stated that “the South Zone Inspector General, Deputy Inspector General of Nellai (Tirunelveli) range and all other officers who are involved should be booked for murder. They should be immediately suspended, and action should be taken against them”. When the Madras High Court ordered a CBI investigation on 12 August 2018, DMK “hailed” the court order.

Moulivakkam Building Collapse (2014-2016)

After the 28 June 2014 building collapse at Moulivakkam that killed 61 people, the then-DMK Treasurer MK Stalin filed a PIL in the Madras High Court seeking a CBI probe into the incident. Stalin insisted on a CBI probe, citing several statutory relaxations made by officials permitting the multi-storeyed building. He alleged that the builder had clout and nexus with some state ministers and that due to the “blessing” of the ministers, there was no inspection at all since 2011 by any planning or enforcement authorities.

On 28 June 2016, Stalin reiterated his demand for CBI investigation, arguing that the final report filed without completion of investigation required proper probe. He also led a well-attended rally of DMK workers and met the Governor on 12 July 2014, submitting a petition demanding a CBI inquiry.

Highway Tender Scam (2018)

The Madras High Court ordered a CBI probe on 11 October 2018, into corruption charges against Chief Minister Edappadi Palaniswami (EPS) made by DMK leader R.S. Bharathi. The DMK alleged that EPS, while heading the highways department, had allotted contracts worth Rs 4,800 crore allegedly based on favoritism to firms owned by his relatives.

The court transferred the case to CBI stating it was in the interest of transparency in the investigation. DMK organizing secretary R.S. Bharathi had approached the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption (DVAC) alleging discrepancies in the allotment of contracts for five highway projects.

Jayalalithaa’s Death (2017)

MK Stalin on 24 September 2017, urged the Centre to order a CBI probe into the death of former Chief Minister J. Jayalalithaa. He stated, “Given the fact that the Centre had helped in providing treatment, it has the responsibility to undo the mysterious knots in connection with her death. So, it must order a CBI probe immediately”.

Stalin characterized the one-member judicial commission appointed by the Tamil Nadu government as “just eyewash” and insisted that “if the Palaniswami regime was truly interested in going into the ‘mysteries’, it should prefer a CBI investigation”. He demanded that British expert Richard Beale and AIIMS doctors be brought under the ambit of the investigation.

Stalin also demanded the resignation of Chief Minister K. Palaniswami and his cabinet to facilitate a fair probe by CBI. He maintained this demand consistently, calling for CBI inquiry multiple times in 2017.

Tuticorin Custodial Deaths – Jayaraj and Bennix (2020)

Following the alleged custodial deaths of father and son P. Jayaraj (59) and J. Bennix (31) on June 22-23, 2020, in Sathankulam, Thoothukudi district, Stalin stated on 26 June 2020, that DMK would seek a CBI probe if the state government failed to carry out a proper investigation.

Stalin questioned, “Chief minister Edappadi K Palaniswami, who takes care of the home department, must answer how the duo died under police custody”. He said the AIADMK government was trying to “cover up” the truth. The case was eventually transferred to CBI, which arrested police officers involved.

Pollachi Sexual Assault Case (2019)

After the Pollachi sexual assault scandal broke in February 2019, where a gang sexually assaulted and blackmailed numerous women, there was widespread demand for CBI investigation. The AIADMK government transferred the case to CBI on March 12, 2019. Thoothukudi MP Kanimozhi alleged that one of the accused in the Pollachi sexual assault case had close ties to a minister from the ruling AIADMK, claiming the party sought to protect the accused. Speaking at Grama Sabha meetings in Kovilpatti, Kayathar, and Kazhugumalai, she credited DMK pressure for shifting the case to the CBI and called for an expedited investigation to ensure justice for the victims.

Cognizant Bribery Case (2019)

On 18 February 2019, after US courts fined Cognizant Technology Solutions $25 million for bribing Tamil Nadu officials to secure building permits for its Chennai development center, Stalin demanded a CBI probe.

Stalin said, “The company has told the US court that it had to pay Rs 26 crore as a bribe during construction of KITS Campus in Chennai to get electricity connection and environment clearance”. He demanded the DVAC should take help of CBI and Interpol to collect relevant documents and bring those involved to books.

Smart City Project Chennai (2018-2020)

Stalin called for a CBI probe into project tenders issued for implementing the Smart City mission, alleging nepotism by Municipal Administration Minister SP Velumani. He questioned how a tender worth Rs 149 crores was given to an inexperienced company.

Stalin demanded action against Minister SP Velumani and other bureaucrats by setting up a CBI ‘special inquiry committee’. He also raised questions in 2020 about the transfer of an official monitoring projects worth Rs 12,000 crore, including Smart City projects, asking whether the Chief Minister was ready to face a CBI probe.

NEET Impersonation Scam (2019)

On 3 October 2019, Stalin demanded a CBI probe into the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) impersonation scam to bring out the truth. He alleged that the government was a “mute spectator” and announced a CB-CID probe for an “eye wash”. Stalin said as per reports, over 50 candidates might have secured admission through foul means like impersonation, and the scam allegedly involved officials and middlemen from not only Tamil Nadu but other states as well.

Cash for MLA Sting Operation (2017)

After a sting operation in June 2017 purportedly showed AIADMK MLAs admitting that bribes were offered in gold and money to support the Sasikala faction during the trust vote, Stalin demanded a CBI probe. On 13 June 2017, after the Speaker refused to allow discussion on the issue, DMK staged a walkout from the Tamil Nadu Assembly. Stalin told reporters, “I raised matter in assembly and sought explanation from the 2 MLAs in the sting. Also demanded a CBI probe, but we were evicted”.

DMK also met the Governor on 17 June 2017, seeking the Palaniswami government’s dismissal and a CBI probe based on the sting operation. However, the Madras High Court on 29 June 2017, dismissed Stalin’s petition demanding CBI and DRI probe in the “Cash for vote” MLA sting.

Other Demands for CBI Probe

Stalin also demanded CBI probes in several other cases during his time in opposition, including:

  • Delhi medical student death (2017): Stalin demanded CBI enquiry into the death of a Tamil Nadu medical student found dead in Delhi.
  • Sekhar Reddy’s case (2019): Stalin demanded CBI probe into alleged payments by mining baron Shekhar Reddy to Tamil Nadu ministers and officials.
  • Central projects worth Rs 17,000 crore (2020): Stalin challenged CM Palaniswami to order a CBI probe into projects funded by the Centre.
When In Power, Oppose CBI Enquiry

As the DMK came to power, they have opposed CBI inquiry for most of the cases that by its own nature, demand one.

Karur Stampede Case (2025)

The most recent and prominent case involves the tragic Karur stampede during TVK leader Vijay’s rally on 27 September 025, which claimed 41 lives. Initially, the Madras High Court refused a CBI probe and ordered an SIT investigation. When the Supreme Court subsequently ordered a CBI investigation on October 13, 2025, the DMK strongly opposed it.

DMK MP and advocate P. Wilson stated that the Supreme Court’s order was only interim, and they would file counter affidavits. The DMK characterized the CBI probe as politically motivated, alleging that “TVK has surrendered to the BJP” and claiming that “BJP waited for this opportunity”. DMK supporters portrayed this as Vijay “falling into the control of the BJP”.

Kallakurichi Hooch Tragedy (2024)

When 67 people died after consuming illicit liquor in Kallakurichi in June 2024, and the Madras High Court ordered a CBI probe in November 2024, the DMK government moved the Supreme Court to challenge this order. Law Minister S. Regupathy stated that the government opposed the CBI probe to ensure “victims get justice quickly,” arguing that transferring the case to CBI would delay proceedings. The DMK argued that 24 people had been arrested and the Goondas Act was slapped on 17, claiming the CB-CID investigation was progressing correctly.
DMK organizing secretary R.S. Bharathi defended the party’s position by stating, “The DMK never sought a CBI probe” and reminded critics that when they had sought an inquiry in the highway tender scam, it was the court that ordered CBI investigation, not their request.

Armstrong Murder Case (2024-2025)

When the Madras High Court ordered a CBI probe into the murder of BSP Tamil Nadu president K. Armstrong on 24 September 2025, the DMK government appealed to the Supreme Court against this decision.  The Tamil Nadu government, represented by Senior Advocate Siddharth Luthra, argued that the Madras High Court had quashed a “comprehensive chargesheet running into 7,411 pages and arraying 30 accused persons” in a “casual manner”. The government contended that the high court was “swayed by extraneous considerations, including media narratives and prevailing political circumstances”. While the Supreme Court partially stayed the order quashing the chargesheet, it allowed the CBI investigation to continue.

Lavanya Suicide Case (2022)

In one of the most controversial cases, when the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court on 31 January 2022, ordered a CBI probe into the suicide of 17-year-old student Lavanya, the DMK government filed a Special Leave Petition in the Supreme Court challenging this order.

The petition was filed by the Tamil Nadu government through the DGP, arguing against transferring the case from state police to CBI. However, the Supreme Court on 13 February 2022, refused to interfere with the High Court’s order, dealing a “huge setback” to the DMK government. The High Court had criticized both the local police and the Education Minister for their statements ruling out the conversion angle before proper investigation, stating the SP “probably forgot the virtues of silence”.

Idol Theft Cases (2018)

When the AIADMK government in 2018 transferred all idol theft cases from the court-appointed investigator IGP Pon Manickavel’s idol wing to the CBI, DMK working president M.K. Stalin strongly opposed this move.

Stalin stated, “When we demanded CBI probe into various other scams, the government refused. Why in this case the government wants to transfer the cases hurriedly to the CBI?”. He characterized the transfer as “politically motivated” and accused the government of running a “non-cooperation movement” against Manickavel. Stalin urged the government to drop the move and allow Manickavel to continue the court-monitored probe.

Kodanad Heist-cum-Murder Case (2019-2023)

Though DMK held protests and called for investigation into the 2017 Kodanad estate case, they notably did not transfer it to CBI after coming to power in 2021. When opposition leader Edappadi Palaniswami demanded the case be handed over to CBI, the DMK government maintained the investigation with CB-CID instead.
The case involved the murder of a security guard at former Chief Minister Jayalalithaa’s Kodanad estate bungalow. Despite completing “90% of the probe,” the DMK shifted it from state police to CB-CID in September 2022 rather than transferring to CBI. In 2024, Chief Minister Stalin stated the case would be probed “with support of Interpol,” but resisted CBI involvement.

Withdrawal of General Consent to CBI (2023)

The most significant institutional step taken by the DMK government against CBI jurisdiction came on 14 June 2023, when Tamil Nadu withdrew its general consent for CBI investigations in the state. This decision came hours after Enforcement Directorate arrested DMK minister V. Senthil Balaji in a money laundering case. The move meant that CBI would henceforth need prior permission from the Tamil Nadu government before conducting any investigation in the state.

Chief Minister Stalin criticized the BJP government at the Centre for adopting “backdoor tactics” against political opponents and condemned the ED searches in the state secretariat. The DMK characterized this as protecting federalism and preventing misuse of central agencies. Tamil Nadu became the tenth (later eleventh) Indian state to withdraw general consent to CBI, joining West Bengal, Rajasthan, Kerala, Punjab, Telangana, Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh, Mizoram, and Meghalaya.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“Foxconn Has Many Subsidiaries, They Respond Differently To Different Reporters” Says DMK Min TRB Rajaa

foxconn trb rajaa

Tamil Nadu Industries Minister T. R. B. Raja on Wednesday reaffirmed in the Legislative Assembly that Foxconn’s planned ₹15,000 crore investment in the state remains confirmed and genuine, amid questions raised by opposition members over conflicting statements from the company.

During a debate session, AIADMK MLA Thangamani asked why Google had chosen to invest in Andhra Pradesh instead of Tamil Nadu and sought clarification on reports that Foxconn had denied any investment plans in the state.

DMK Minister Rajaa clarified that all the agreements announced so far by the Tamil Nadu government had been confirmed and that the Foxconn deal was legitimate. He explained that Foxconn comprises multiple subsidiary companies, and while one American entity under the Foxconn group had denied plans to set up operations in Tamil Nadu, another Foxconn company is indeed proceeding with the investment.

Foxconn has many firms which produce different things. Their responses will be different for different reporters who extend a mic. They asked an American firm (related to Foxconn). We can’t talk about it I’ll tell you why. That firm had responded that they did not do the investment. This is what has happened.“, TRB Rajaa said.

Raja further said that the Chief Minister had advised legislators not to politicize issues involving India–U.S. trade relations and to maintain a consistent stance aligned with the Union government.

Commenting on Google’s investments and the role of major conglomerates, Raja stated that he did not wish to criticize the neighbouring state’s investments or the involvement of industrial groups such as Adani.

Rajaa further said “You can ask how come Google, a US company is announcing. That’s because Google is not there in China. A company which is there in China, US and India is not able to openly announce their decisions. When an investment comes in, as Indians we should understand the geopolitical reason. He has said that no ‘new’ investments are being made and did not say no investments are coming. Can’t you see the diplomacy in this? You’ve been in power.

He reiterated that the ₹15,000 crore investment generation 14,000 jobs is assured and is definitely coming to Tamil Nadu.

The minister added that misinformation about industrial projects could discourage investors and harm youth employment prospects, noting that the state had already facilitated 32 lakh jobs under current initiatives.

Raja concluded that the central government had also issued clarifications on the matter and that Tamil Nadu remained a preferred destination for global manufacturers like Foxconn.

Source: News 18 Tamil Nadu

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

England: Peterborough’s Only Hindu Temple Faces Closure As Council Puts Building Up For Sale

Peterborough’s Only Hindu Temple Faces Closure As Council Puts Building Up For Sale
Image Source: OpIndia

The only Hindu temple in the East of England, serving around 13,500 Hindus across Cambridgeshire, Norfolk, and parts of Lincolnshire, is facing possible closure after the Peterborough City Council decided to sell the property it occupies to pay off municipal debts.

The Bharat Hindu Samaj Temple, located in the New England Complex in Peterborough, has been a religious and cultural centre since its establishment in 1984. The temple management submitted a bid before the council’s Monday night deadline to purchase the entire complex, which consists of seven units.

Temple president Kishor Ladwa said the temple had initially reached an agreement in April with the council to buy the property for £1.3 million, which included a £504,000 discount recognising the social value of its community services. However, in September, the council informed them that other buyers had emerged and that it could no longer offer the complex at the previously agreed amount, asking the temple to increase its bid. The council has not revealed the identities of the other bidders but has suggested that they may be community organisations.

According to Ladwa, the temple has been negotiating with the council for 14 years to secure ownership, but the terms have repeatedly changed. He said the temple wished to avoid becoming a tenant under a new owner and added that despite their willingness to sign a purchase agreement, the council never provided a legally binding contract.

The temple functions as a major community hub, particularly for the elderly. It hosts weekly luncheons, health workshops for dementia and diabetes, and cultural activities such as Bollywood dance, yoga, Zumba, and language classes in Hindi and Gujarati. Members of the management committee have said the facility helps reduce social isolation among older members of the community and saves public funds by providing essential social services.

Temple representatives also noted that the idols consecrated in a week-long ceremony years ago could not easily be relocated if they are forced to vacate the site. Petitions have since gained thousands of signatures urging the council to halt the sale.

Peterborough City Council cabinet member for finance and corporate governance, Councillor Mohammed Jamil, stated that while the council recognises the anxiety among the Hindu community, it must sell community assets on the open market to ensure the best value for taxpayers. He added that if the Bharat Hindu Samaj Temple is not selected as the preferred bidder, its tenancy rights would transfer to the new owner, and it would continue to have legal protections under the Landlord and Tenant Act of 1954.

(Source: Times of India)

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Trump Confirms CIA Covert Operations In Venezuela To Target Maduro Regime, Says Land Strikes Being Considered

Trump Confirms CIA Covert Operations In Venezuela To Target Maduro Regime, Says Land Strikes Being Considered

U.S. President Donald Trump has confirmed that he has authorised the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to conduct covert operations inside Venezuela, signalling a major escalation in Washington’s long-running campaign to remove Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro from power.

Trump said the decision was part of a broader effort to counter what he described as drug trafficking and criminal networks linked to the Maduro regime. Speaking to reporters in the Oval Office on Wednesday, alongside FBI Director Kash Patel and Attorney General Pam Bondi, the President stated that Venezuela had “emptied their prisons into the United States” and was responsible for large quantities of drugs entering the country.

“I authorised for two reasons really,” Trump said. “Number one, they have emptied their prisons into the United States of America. They came in through the border. And the other thing are drugs. We have a lot of drugs coming in from Venezuela, and a lot of the Venezuelan drugs come in through the sea. So, you get to see that, but we’re going to stop them by land also.”

Trump added that Washington was now considering extending its operations to land-based strikes, saying, “we are certainly looking at land now, because we’ve got the sea very well under control.”

When asked if the CIA’s new mandate included plans to directly overthrow Maduro, Trump declined to give details. “Wouldn’t it be a ridiculous question for me to answer?” he said, calling it inappropriate to comment on operational specifics. He added, “I think Venezuela is feeling heat. But I think a lot of other countries are feeling heat too. We’re not going to let this country, our country, be ruined because other people want to drop, as you say, their worst.”

According to U.S. officials familiar with the decision, the authorisation outlined in a classified presidential finding grants the CIA authority to conduct a broad range of covert activities, including potentially lethal operations. The stated objective is to remove Maduro from power, amid ongoing U.S. accusations that he leads a criminal network tied to narcotics trafficking, including the Cartel of the Suns and the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua. Maduro has repeatedly rejected these allegations, and some U.S. intelligence assessments have questioned claims that Venezuela is a major producer of drugs.

The move follows a series of U.S. military actions in the region. The administration has reportedly deployed around 10,000 troops to the Caribbean, mainly stationed in Puerto Rico, and positioned eight surface warships and a submarine near Venezuelan waters. Over the past several weeks, U.S. forces have carried out at least five strikes on suspected drug-carrying vessels off the Venezuelan coast, resulting in 27 deaths. The operations have drawn criticism from United Nations human rights experts, who described them as potential “extrajudicial executions.”

A leaked congressional memo has classified the U.S. campaign as part of a “non-international armed conflict” against drug-trafficking groups, which it identifies as “nonstate armed organizations” posing a direct threat to the United States. CIA Director John Ratcliffe, known for his advocacy of a more aggressive intelligence posture, has expanded the agency’s counternarcotics operations across Latin America, including drone-based surveillance targeting fentanyl laboratories in Mexico.

Secretary of State and National Security Adviser Marco Rubio has been closely involved in shaping the policy, labelling Maduro a “narcoterrorist” and pressing for his removal. The strategy mirrors previous CIA interventions in Latin America, such as the 1954 coup in Guatemala and efforts against Fidel Castro in Cuba, which led to prolonged instability in the region.

The Venezuelan government has condemned Trump’s statements, accusing Washington of openly admitting to planning “CIA coups.” In a statement, Caracas said, “The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela rejects the extravagant statements of the President of the United States, in which he publicly admits having authorized operations in order to act against the peace and stability of Venezuela.”

Venezuela’s foreign ministry announced that it would raise the issue with the United Nations Security Council and the UN Secretary-General, warning of escalating threats to regional sovereignty and peace.

(Source: OpIndia)

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Supreme Court Rejects Telangana Govt’s Plea Against High Court Stay On 42% OBC Reservation In Local Body Polls

Supreme Court Rejects Telangana Govt’s Plea Against High Court Stay On 42% OBC Reservation In Local Body Polls

The Supreme Court on Thursday, 16 October 2025, dismissed the plea filed by the State of Telangana challenging the Telangana High Court’s interim order that stayed the implementation of 42% reservation for Backward Classes in local body elections. A bench comprising Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta clarified that the High Court should decide the main matter on merits without being influenced by the dismissal of the State’s Special Leave Petition.

At the outset, Justice Nath asked Senior Advocate Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi why the reservation was not brought in before the elections were notified. Singhvi responded that the Governor had kept the Bill pending without granting assent. “The Bill became a law based on ‘deemed assent’ in terms of the Supreme Court’s judgment in the Tamil Nadu Governor case. Without making any challenge to the law, a stay has been secured,” he added.

Justice Nath then asked, “How do you challenge a Bill?” Singhvi replied, “The Bill has become an Act now, and has been acted upon on the basis of deemed assent.”

Senior Advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan, representing the respondents, said the challenge was made to the Government Order that resulted in the reservation exceeding the 50% ceiling. “As per the K. Krishna Murthy (Dr.) & Ors. v. Union of India and Vikas Kishanrao Gawali judgments, triple tests have to be fulfilled before giving reservations in local self-government institutions. Earlier, it was 15%, 10% and 25% respectively for SC, ST and OBCs within the 50% limit,” he added. He pointed out that the Supreme Court has previously held in Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh that reservation should not cross 50% for local body elections.

Another counsel for the respondents submitted that the State cannot unilaterally act on the basis of “deemed assent” for the Bill, as the Tamil Nadu Governor judgment held that the State must seek a writ of mandamus from the Court if there is a delay on the part of the Governor in granting assent to the Bill.

In response, Singhvi argued that the 50% limit was not an “inflexible rule” and claimed that the State satisfied the triple tests to enhance the reservation. “Door-to-door household socio-economic surveys were done ‘painstakingly’ for one year,” he added.

Justice Nath remarked, “Based on these exercises, you have come up with the Ordinance and a Bill. That is yet to take a final shape.” Singhvi asserted that the law was in operation. Justice Mehta pointed out that the Gawali judgment did not allow crossing the 50% limit. Singhvi replied that Gawali held 50% could be crossed if there was empirical data and highlighted that Telangana was the only State to have conducted such a survey.

The bench was not persuaded by these arguments and dismissed the petition. “You may continue with your elections [without reservations]… dismissed,” Justice Nath said.

(Source: LiveLaw)

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Sahara, Who Defrauded Lakhs In Chitfund, Now Represented By Former Congress Leader Kapil Sibal In Asset Sale Plea

Sahara, Who Defrauded Lakhs In Chitfund, Now Represented By Congress Leader Kapil Sibal In Supreme Court Asset Sale Plea

The Supreme Court on Tuesday sought responses from the Centre and the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) on a plea filed by Sahara India Commercial Corporation Ltd (SICCL), which is seeking permission to sell its assets, including the 8,810-acre Aamby Valley City in Maharashtra, to Adani Properties Pvt Ltd, to raise funds to refund its investors.

A bench comprising CJI B R Gavai and Justices Surya Kant and M M Sundresh directed that the Finance and Cooperation Ministries be impleaded, following submissions by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta that the Centre may need to examine Sahara’s proposal and provide its perspective. “Please consider impleading the Secretary, Finance, and the Secretary, Cooperative Societies. Because some cooperative societies have invested through their employees, etc.,” Mehta noted.

Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, a prominent former Congress leader, is representing Sahara in this high-profile case. He argued that earlier attempts to sell the properties piecemeal had failed and the only viable option was to sell them as a single block of 88 properties.

Representing SEBI, Senior Advocate Arvind Datar stated that Sahara could proceed with the sale provided the sale price is not less than 90% of the market value. The court also directed parties, including Sahara employees, to submit their claims to Senior Advocate Shekhar Naphade, appointed as Amicus Curiae in the matter.

Sahara has so far deposited about ₹16,000 crore of the principal ₹24,030 crore in the SEBI-Sahara Refund Account, leaving roughly ₹9,000 crore yet to be paid. Naphade suggested that this amount should be deposited first.

The plea highlighted that multiple agencies investigating Sahara family members and officials had complicated efforts to monetise assets. It also alleged that the decision to sell all properties in one lot was due to unauthorised attempts by certain individuals to alienate Sahara’s valuable assets following the death of founder Subrata Roy in 2023.

Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for Adani Properties, confirmed that the real estate group is ready to purchase all 88 properties.

The Supreme Court will next hear the matter on November 17, as Sahara attempts to resolve its long-standing obligations to investors who were defrauded through its controversial chitfund schemes.

About Sahara Scam

The “Sahara scam” refers to the allegations of fraud and financial irregularities against the Sahara India Pariwar group, particularly its founder Subrata Roy. The group was accused of running ponzi schemes and failing to refund investors a significant amount of money, which led to a major legal battle, Roy’s arrest, and a prolonged effort by regulatory bodies like the SEBI (Securities and Exchange Board of India) to get the money back to investors.

(Source: Indian Express)

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Indian Nurse Nimisha Priya’s Execution In Yemen On Hold, Modi Govt Tells Supreme Court

Family And Diplomats Race Against Time To Save Nimisha Priya From Yemen Death Row

The Supreme Court on Thursday was informed that the execution of Indian nurse Nimisha Priya, convicted of murdering her Yemeni business partner in 2017, has been temporarily stayed, and no adverse action has taken place so far.

During the hearing of a plea seeking directions for the Union Government to use diplomatic channels to secure Priya’s release, Attorney General R. Venkataramani told a bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta that a new mediator has stepped into the matter. “The only good thing is that nothing adverse has happened,” he added.

The counsel appearing for the petitioner organisation ‘Save Nimisha Priya International Action Council’, which is extending legal support to Priya, confirmed that her execution has been stayed. The bench indicated that the matter may be adjourned, saying, “List in January 2026. It will be open for the parties to apply for early listing in case the situation demands.”

Priya, hailing from Palakkad in Kerala, was convicted in 2017, sentenced to death in 2020, and had her final appeal rejected in 2023. She is currently imprisoned in Sana’a, Yemen.

The petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that under Sharia law, payment of blood money to the victim’s family could be explored, which might lead to Priya’s pardon. It was also noted that Priya’s mother is in Yemen to negotiate with the victim’s family, after receiving permission from the Delhi High Court to travel there.

According to NDTV, the Union Government has been engaging with Yemeni authorities and friendly nations to reach a mutually agreeable solution. Earlier updates to the Supreme Court indicated that there was no immediate threat to Priya’s life, and the government has assured it is doing everything possible to ensure her safety.

(Source: NDTV)

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

DMK Govt Fact-Check Unit Claims Hindi Ban Bill Was A ‘Rumour’ But DMK Cadres Were Seen Celebrating And Burning Hindi Posters

The Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) government’s claim that reports of a proposed bill to ban Hindi imposition were “rumours” stands contradicted by substantial evidence, including celebratory acts by party cadres and confirmed internal legislative preparations. The government’s abrupt U-turn today following alleged pressure from coalition partners reveals a calculated political strategy gone awry.

Multiple sources had confirmed that the DMK government was set to table legislation in the Tamil Nadu Assembly seeking to ban Hindi hoardings, boards, movies, and songs across the state. Senior DMK leader TKS Elangovan had explicitly stated, “We won’t do anything against the Constitution. We are against the imposition of Hindi,” providing official confirmation of the party’s intent.

Following heavy backlash, the alleged ‘fact-checking’ unit of the DMK government dismissed it as a rumour adding that no proposal for such a bill has been received.

The party’s grassroots response further exposed the planned move. In Pollachi, DMK functionaries were seen burning Hindi letters in celebration upon learning about the impending bill, demonstrating this was not merely speculative but a coordinated political action.

In the video, the Pollachi district DMK cadre are seen saying, “Today, we heard that chief minister MK Stalin is going to table a bill in TN assembly to ban Hindi in TN. If such a bill is passed, on behalf of Pollachi city DMK unit and other units, we are conducting a demand protest by burning Hindi letters and welcoming the decision to table such a bill.”

However, in a dramatic reversal, the government withdrew the proposal amid reports of pressure from the INDI alliance partners. Senior journalist Rajagopalan reported that “two critical phone calls—one from Patna and another from New Delhi to Chennai”, possibly involving Congress leader Rahul Gandhi and RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav, forced the DMK to retreat, fearing electoral repercussions in Hindi-speaking Bihar.

The sequence of events, from legislative preparation and cadre mobilization to sudden withdrawal under coalition pressure, reveals the DMK’s attempt to use language politics to divert attention from governance failures, including the Karur stampede and Kallakurichi hooch tragedy, only to be reined in by national political realities.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

DMK Govt Arrests Hygiene Workers Protesting For Permanency In Job

DMK Govt Arrests Sanitation Workers While Attempting To Submit Petition To Chennai Mayor, Commissioner

Hundreds of sanitation workers were detained again by police on Tuesday, marking the 75th day of their ongoing protest demanding job regularisation under the Greater Chennai Corporation (GCC) and opposing the privatisation of solid waste management operations.

The workers had gathered in their respective wards to submit petitions to ward councillors, reiterating their demands for reinstatement and permanent employment. Police reportedly detained workers at seven marriage and community halls across the city during these submissions.

Speaking to the media, K. Bharathi of the Uzhaippor Urimai Iyakkam, which is leading the protest, said, “The workers who are seeking reinstatement and regularisation of employment under GCC are being detained repeatedly. Today marks the 75th day since the workers have been denied work under the city corporation, where they have served for over a decade. The government seems to be siding with the private contractor, Ramky.” He also alleged that workers were asked to pay ₹3,000 for not filing a counter affidavit, but the workers have collectively decided not to comply.

K. Suresh, secretary of the Labour and Trade Union Council (LTUC), said that workers from 30 wards in Royapuram and Thiru-Vi-Ka Nagar zones were detained while attempting to meet their councillors. “Among those detained were workers from Mayor R. Priya’s ward. However, a few councillors, including ward 49 councillor D. Elango, ward 62 councillor Jagadeesan, and ward 63 councillor Siva Raajashekaran, received the petitions,” he added.

Union representatives reported that around 400 workers were detained on Tuesday and reaffirmed that their protest would continue until their demands are met, emphasising that the call for job regularisation and opposition to privatisation remains firm.

(Source: The New Indian Express)

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.