Home Blog Page 406

Madras High Court Clears Way For ECI To Proceed With AIADMK Leadership Dispute And Symbol Allocation Hearing

The Madras High Court has granted the Election Commission of India (ECI) permission to proceed with hearings regarding the leadership dispute within the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK) and the allocation of the party’s ‘Two Leaves’ symbol. However, the court made it clear that the ECI must first confirm its jurisdiction over such internal party matters before moving forward.

Expelled AIADMK leader O. Panneerselvam (OPS) expressed his approval of the High Court’s decision. He noted that the Election Commission had previously asserted its authority to handle the matter, much like a court. OPS further emphasized that the court’s ruling, which allows the ECI hearings to proceed and rejects the plea from Edappadi K. Palaniswami (EPS), signals a victory for justice.

This ruling follows a petition filed by EPS, the General Secretary of AIADMK, which sought to prevent the ECI from investigating complaints filed by expelled party members who challenged his leadership and the legitimacy of recent party resolutions.

AIADMK officials have argued that the ECI accepted petitions from expelled members and was exceeding its authority. Senior leader C.V. Shanmugam contended that the ECI cannot interfere with a party’s internal matters, stating that the Commission’s role is limited to registering political parties and recording changes, not to verify the legality of those changes. He hailed the High Court’s decision as a win, aligning with the party’s position.

Previously, the High Court had issued a stay on the ECI hearings. However, OPS’s son, O.P. Ravindranath, and other AIADMK leaders, including Pugazhendi and K.C. Palanisamy, challenged this order. A bench led by Justices A. Subramanian and G. Arulmurugan ultimately allowed the ECI to continue its investigation in accordance with the established procedures for resolving party leadership disputes and symbol allocation.

This ruling paves the way for the ECI to hear petitions concerning AIADMK’s leadership and the use of its party symbol.

EPS, who has been leading the AIADMK since 2022, following the expulsion of OPS, has been the party’s head. Prior to that, both leaders served as joint heads of the party. OPS and his supporters have filed multiple legal challenges against his expulsion in the High Court and the Supreme Court.

(With Inputs From India Today)

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Part-Time Politician Vijay’s TVK Forms Children’s Wing While EC Rules Prohibit Involving Children For Political Purpose

If controversy had a name, it would be ‘Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam’ (TVK). The party’s latest move has sparked outrage with its announcement of a ‘Children’s Wing’ as one of the 28 political factions under the TVK umbrella. This decision blatantly violates the election code, the constitution, and basic morality. Children should not be involved in politics until they reach the age of 18. The announcement of a dedicated ‘Children’s Wing’ by part-time politician Vijay’s party has drawn severe criticism, with concerns that it could have a damaging impact on the lives of young individuals.

On 5 February 2024, the Election Commission of India issued a press note making it clear that it maintains a zero-tolerance policy towards the use of children in election-related work or campaign activities. The Commission directed political parties, candidates, and election officials to refrain from involving children in any aspect of political campaigns or rallies.

The guidelines stated, “In continuation of earlier instructions aimed at improving campaign discourse and ensuring respectful treatment of Persons with Disabilities (PwDs), the Election Commission has issued strict directives concerning the use of children in election-related activities. Political parties and candidates are explicitly advised not to involve children in any form of election campaign, including distributing posters or pamphlets, chanting slogans, or participating in rallies and meetings. The Commission has expressed ‘Zero Tolerance’ towards any use of children during the electoral process.”

Key instructions include:

  1. Prohibition of Child Participation: Political parties are prohibited from using children in any election-related activities. This includes, but is not limited to, rallies, distributing posters, chanting slogans, or any other form of involvement. Children should not be used in campaigns in any way, including being held by political leaders or taken in vehicles during rallies.
  2. No Use of Children for Political Campaigning: The guidelines also prohibit using children to give the impression of political campaigning, such as through poems, songs, spoken words, displaying party insignia, promoting the party’s achievements, or criticizing opponents.

However, the Commission clarified that the mere presence of a child with a parent or guardian near a political leader, as long as the child is not involved in campaign activities, does not violate these guidelines.

  1. Legal Compliance: All political parties and candidates must ensure strict adherence to the Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986, as amended in 2016. The Commission referred to a 2014 Bombay High Court ruling (PIL No. 127 of 2012) that stressed the importance of ensuring that political parties refrain from involving minor children in any election activities.

Election officials, including District Election Officers and Returning Officers, are personally responsible for ensuring compliance with these directives. Any violations by election machinery will lead to severe disciplinary action.

The TVK’s decision has sparked online ridicule, with many netizens mocking the move. Here are some of the reactions

 

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Part-Time Politician Vijay’s TVK Enlists Transgender’s Wing As Number ‘9’ In Official Press Release Triggering  Backlash From Trans Community

Actor Vijay, who is also the leader of the Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK), found himself at the center of controversy after the party released an official notification listing its various wings. Among them, the ‘Transgender Wing’ was notably placed at number 9 out of 28 subsidiary wings—a decision that quickly drew criticism. In colloquial Tamil, the number 9 has long carried derogatory connotations toward the transgender community, making the choice both insensitive and controversial.

As TVK gears up for the 2026 Tamil Nadu Assembly elections, it has announced various wings, including those for Information Technology, Advocacy, Media, Propaganda and Public Speaking, Training and Cadre Development, Climate Research and Environment, Historic Data Research and Fact-Checking, Students, and Women. However, placing the Transgender Wing at number 9 has sparked criticism from transgeder activists.

Trans rights activist Living Smile Vidya has slammed the part-time politician Vijay and his party, the Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) for labeling their political wing “Transgender Wing” under the number 9. Vidya condemned the use of number 9, which has long been a derogatory term in Tamil Nadu, used to mock and shame the transgender community for being neither male nor female.

Criticizing the latest move by the actor-turned-politician, Vidya took to her official X account to state that, “Time and again! This slur term „9“ has, has to haunt us! why? @tvkvijayhq I see you want to be inclusive, but why would you list it at 9. place?! is it some kind of sick joke? Irritating!! Dear Intellects, step up and be supportive to us, your silence encourages this bullshit!!” 

So far, TVK has not responded to the backlash.

Since the recent overhaul of TVK’s organizational structure, the party has been embroiled in controversy, with cadres raising concerns about the appointments at the district level. Many have accused the leadership of overlooking dedicated workers in favor of selecting controversial and dubious figures. In this context, the TVK’s decision to label the Transgender wing as No. 9 has sparked widespread criticism and ridicule.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

DMK MP Thanga Tamil Selvan Slams Islamist Groups Over Controversial Goat Sacrifice Claims At Sacred Hindu Site Thiruparankundram Hills

DMK’s Andipatti MLA, Thanga Tamil Selvan, has strongly criticized Islamist groups claiming the right to sacrifice goats and roosters at the sacred Hindu site Thiruparankundram hilltop’s Sikkandar Dargah, calling it completely wrong and not a customary practice. He stated that this new development was influenced by external groups, and that Hindus and Muslims in the local community have always lived together peacefully, respecting each other’s sentiments. He emphasized that the problem arose when these groups attempted to impose this practice, which was never part of the tradition. He also asserted that Muslims have never worshipped a burial site or anything other than Allah.

Thanga Tamil Selvan, speaking to a private media channel, said, “Muslims arrived there about 500 years ago, and this is the case in many countries throughout history—every era sees different groups rise to power. When that happened, a man named Sikkandar died and was buried there as a form of worship, like Dargahs. The majority of people who visit are Hindus, more than Muslims. It’s a belief there that worshipping at this site helps remove bad fortune and bring in good fortune, a tradition that has been followed for generations. There’s no difference between our Piranmallai Kallars and the Muslims there. Now, when people newly say, “I will go and slaughter a goat, cook biryani, and offer a blood sacrifice,” that’s when the problem arises. This is an unnecessary issue. The Muslims there and we have lived together till this day, with no division between us. However, I want to point out that groups like Hindu Munnani, RSS, and some Islamists are stirring up an unnecessary discussion, which is completely wrong. First of all, Muslims who went there and claimed they will perform blood sacrifices and slaughter goats is completely wrong, as this was never part of the custom.”

He explained that, “For Muslims, Allah is their God, and there is no practice of worshiping a burial site and what we oppose is the imposition of a new practice, that is what we oppose which is completely wrong.”

Backdrop

The sacred Hindu site of Thirupparankundram Hills is witnessing escalating tensions, with controversial actions by a Muslim politician stoking divisive rhetoric. Indian Union Muslim League member and Ramanathapuram MP, Navas Kani, who also holds the position of chairman of the Tamil Nadu Waqf Board, has stirred further discord by declaring that the dargah on the hilltop is Waqf property. He also shared a post on social media claiming that Muslims had consumed cooked non-vegetarian food at the foothills, which outraged Hindus and devotees. This move sent shockwaves through the region, further intensifying existing tensions.

This development is part of a series of incidents that have strained relations between Hindus and Muslims, who had previously lived in harmony. Some Islamists groups have been attempting to assert their rights to conduct animal sacrifices at the hilltop, furthering their claims that the entire Thirupparankundram Hills should be recognized as Sikkandar Hills.

The situation escalated on 27 December 2024, when Madurai police intervened to detain a group of Muslims family attempting to bring goats and roosters to the hilltop dargah for ritual sacrifice. Syed Abu Dahir, a 53-year-old from Malaiyadipatti in Rajapalayam, arrived with his family and animals for the ceremony but was stopped by authorities at the base of the hill. Police informed them that bringing livestock up the hill was prohibited, which led to a protest by over 20 local Muslims at the foot of the hill in solidarity with the family.

The following week, on 5 January 2025, another large group of Muslim protesters gathered at Thirupparankundram Hills, demanding permission to offer prayers at the mosque located at the top. When the police denied their request, tensions escalated, leading to a brief scuffle and the detention of the protesters.

On 17 January 2025, during the Santhanakoodu Festival at a nearby dargah, social media posts began circulating about an upcoming “Equality Feast” (Samabanthi Bhojan) on 18 January at the hilltop dargah, where goats and roosters were allegedly to be sacrificed. Fearing communal unrest, police set up barricades and conducted searches to prevent the transportation of livestock to the hill. When the dargah Jamath was informed that animal sacrifices were not allowed, protests broke out. Members of the Jamath, along with other Muslim protesters, clashed with the police, causing further disruptions.

The situation was exacerbated by the involvement of the Social Democratic Party of India (SDPI), an ally of AIADMK and a group linked to the banned terror outfit PFI. These elements are believed to be behind the attempts to conduct animal sacrifices at the sacred Thirupparankundram Hill.

Furthering tensions, on 21 January 2025, DMK Manapparai MLA Abdul Samad was accused of conducting an illegal survey around the temple with intentions to gain control of the hill. On the same day, IUML member and Ramanathapuram MP Navas Kani was seen giving an interview near the Thirupparankundram Hills. When asked whether the dargah at the hilltop was under the Waqf Board, Kani confirmed, “Yes, it is under the control of the Tamil Nadu Waqf Board,” further heightening tensions in the area.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Inside the Rohingya Rights Lobby: Who’s Pulling The Strings?

The Supreme Court, on 12 February 2025, heard a plea for Rohingya illegals’ access to schools, free healthcare, and subsidised food. The Supreme Court emphasized that no child should face discrimination in education. The court asked for details on their settlements, with the NGO Rohingya Human Rights Initiative stating that “refugees” hold UNHCR cards but lack Aadhaar, barring them from essential services. They reside in Shaheen Bagh, Kalindi Kunj, and Khajuri Khas. The PIL seeks free education, healthcare, and government benefits for Rohingyas, similar to Indian citizens.

The plea is filed by Colin Gonsalves on behalf of NGO Rohingya Human Rights Initiative members who are Rohingyas living in India. Let’s take a look at who funds this “initiative.

Rohingya Human Rights Initiative (R4R) was created in 2017 as registered as a Public Charitable Trust and non-profit, non-governmental organisation. It receives funds from the Global Statelessness Fund which is a project of the Netherlands-based Institute on Statelessness and Inclusion.

All of this money is the trickle-down effect from UNHCR Soros’s Open Society Foundation, Govt of Canada’s Global Refugee Sponsorship Initiative which was announced in 2016. As soon Soros fund was announced, R4R was created in 2017.

Both the Global Statelessness Fund and the Institute on Statelessness and Inclusion get funds from Soros’s Open Society Foundation and Ford Foundation.

Ali Johar (Maung Thein Shwe) came to India in 2005. He is an advisor at R4R was a former fellow of Refugees International whose President is a former USAID employee and RI receives funding from OSF and Rockefeller Brothers Fund. He is also part of the Free Rohingya Coalition which receives funds from the Global Statelessness Fund. He lives in Delhi.

Ali Johar was given the Global Youth Peace Ambassador recognised by Rajiv Gandhi National Institute of Youth Development, Ministry of Youth Affairs & Sports, Government of India. He is currently a Fellow at Social Change Initiative which is funded by Oak Foundation, Unbound Philanthropy which has close links to Soros.

Ravi Hemadri is an advisor at R4R. He runs the Development and Justice Initiative (DAJI) whose project Right to Nationality and Citizenship Network (RNCN) campaigns in India every child born in India should get Indian citizenship irrespective of their parents’ legal status. Ravi also runs The Other Media protested against the Vedanta Sterlite plant and is under govt scanner for FCRA violations.

Development and Justice Initiative (DAJI) and the Other Media both FCRA’s are still open.

R4R advisor Dr. Maung Zarni is the co-founder of the Free Rohingya Coalition. He is a frequent guest at Hindus for Human Rights talks. He is also on the board of the Forces of Renewal of Southeast Asia (FORSEA).

Amal de Chickera another advisor at R4R is a Sri Lankan. he is also the Steering Committee member of the Global Statelessness Fund and founder of Stichting Institute on Statelessness and Inclusion.

Prashant Bhushan and Colin Gonsalves have advocated for the rights of Rohingyas in India. Gonsalves is the advocate for Zubair and Soros, the Ford Foundation, and Churches for his NGO Human Rights Law Network (HRLN).

Refugees International is pushing India to take in more Rohingyas and not deport illegals from India. RI is headed by Jeremy Konyndyk, former USAID’s lead official for COVID-19. RI teams up with The Azadi Project run by Priyali Sur, a former news anchor of CNN-IBN. She petitioned the SC seeking the release of detained Rohingyas. USAID’s Director John Gilligan said the agency was infiltrated with CIA people “the idea was to plant operatives in every kind of activity we had overseas: government, volunteer, religious, every kind”.

Colin Gonsalves is connected to the founder of AltNews Pratik Sinha through an NGO called Human Rights Law Network (HRLN) which had a joint venture called Janhit with Jan Sangarsh Manch whose owners were the parents of Pratik Sinha.

It is noteworthy that Gonsalves’ NGO HRLN received funds from the Open Society Foundation (Soros), Ford Foundation, Tata Trust, and many other Christian organisations and Western embassies.

This article is based on an X thread by Stop Hindu Hate Advocacy Network (SHHAN)

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

‘I Was Almost Sentenced to Death’, Says Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg Over Blasphemy Row In Pakistan

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has claimed that he was “almost sentenced to death in Pakistan” after facing legal action over blasphemous content posted on his social media platform.

Speaking in a recent interview with podcaster Joe Rogan, Zuckerberg discussed the challenges social media platforms face due to differing legal frameworks worldwide. He cited Pakistan as an example, stating that criminal proceedings were initiated against him after blasphemous content—specifically a drawing of the Prophet Muhammad—was shared on Facebook.

“There are laws in different countries that we disagree with. For example, there was a time when someone was trying to get me sentenced to death in Pakistan because someone on Facebook had a drawing of the Prophet Muhammad, and someone said that’s blasphemy in our culture’. They sued me and opened criminal proceedings… But I am not planning to go to Pakistan, so I’m not worried about it,” Zuckerberg said.

While acknowledging that the situation was unsettling, Zuckerberg remarked that flying over the region posed a potential risk, saying, “It’s not great if you’re flying over that region, you don’t want your plane to go down above Pakistan.”

He further highlighted broader concerns about government interference in free speech, arguing that some nations seek to impose restrictions on content that would otherwise be considered legitimate expression. “To have those governments exert that kind of power is a lot of force,” he said, calling on the US government to support American tech companies facing such challenges abroad.

Zuckerberg’s remarks come just weeks after Meta announced sweeping changes to its content moderation policies, including the removal of fact-checkers across Facebook, Instagram, and Threads. The company’s new approach will focus on addressing high-severity violations such as terrorism, child exploitation, and drug-related offences, while promoting a policy of “more speech” by easing certain restrictions on mainstream discussions.

The overhaul has been widely praised by figures such as former US President Donald Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who have previously criticized Meta’s content policies.

(With inputs from India Today)

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Fake Website Dupes Devotees Of Thirunallar Lord Shani Temple, Probe Underway

An unauthorized website impersonating the official platform of the renowned Lord Shani Temple in Thirunallar, Karaikal district, has surfaced, allegedly defrauding devotees of large sums under the guise of prayer bookings. The fraudulent website, resembling the temple’s legitimate platform, has drawn the attention of the Hindu Religious Institutions department and is now under cybercrime investigation.

Authorities became aware of the issue after devotees reported not receiving the promised prasadam for prayers booked through the fake portal. Following a complaint filed in January, Karaikal cybercrime officials launched an investigation into the scam. The Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments (HR&CE) department and temple administration have urged law enforcement to take down the unauthorized website and take action against its creators.

The official website of the temple is thirunallarutemple.org, while the fraudulent site operates under thirunallartemple.com. The fake platform mimics the legitimate one, offering prayer booking options such as Monthly Kattalai Archanai, Ashtothra Archanai, and Sahasranama Archanai, with charges ranging from ₹981 to ₹5,001 for Indian devotees and up to $151 (₹13,256) for international devotees.

The Thirunallar Lord Shani Temple, situated within the Lord Dharbaranyeswarar Temple, is one of South India’s prominent Navagraha shrines, drawing millions of devotees annually, especially on Saturdays. Investigations suggest that the fraudulent website may have been operational for several years. Karaikal police have requested the domain registrar to remove the website, and further inquiries are underway.

(With inputs from The New Indian Express)

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

2 States In India Have Sanskrit As Official Language But Dravidian Model DMK MP Dayanidhi Maran Exposes His Ignorance

DMK MP Dayanidhi Maran, on 11 February 2025, opposed the simultaneous interpretation of Lok Sabha proceedings in Sanskrit, arguing that it was unnecessary and a waste of taxpayers’ money. He linked the move to RSS ideology and questioned the relevance of Sanskrit as a communicative language.

During Question Hour, Maran cited the 2011 Census, which recorded only 73,000 Sanskrit speakers, and emphasized that while he supported interpretation in official state languages, he objected to Sanskrit being included. He said, “Sir, you are giving translation, which is most welcome, for the languages, which are the state languages, official state languages, can you tell me which state official language is Sanskrit? Why are we wasting taxpayers’ money with this language, which is not even communicable, nobody communicates with it in any of the states in India, nobody speaks with it. The population survey in 2011 said only 73000 people are supposed to be speaking. Sir, when there is data, why should the taxpayers’ money be wasted because of your RSS ideologies?”

While he received belt treatment from the Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla who schooled him that he was living in Bharat where Sanskrit is one of the official languages and is recognised by the House. Om Birla asserted that Sanskrit has been India’s primary language. Birla clarified that interpretation services were being provided in multiple languages, not just Sanskrit, and later announced the inclusion of six more languages—Bodo, Dogri, Maithili, Manipuri, Sanskrit, and Urdu—for simultaneous interpretation in Parliament.

However, it is noteworthy that Maran exposed his ignorance when he claimed that only 73000 people in India spoke the language. Uttarakhand and Himachal Pradesh have designated Sanskrit as official languages of the state. In 2010, Uttarakhand became the first state in India to designate Sanskrit as its second official language. In 2019, Himachal Pradesh followed as the second state to grant Sanskrit the same status.

Additionally, Wikipedia says that there are 2,360,821 total speakers of Sanskrit in India, as of 2011. So, on both fronts – be it numbers or assuming that no one speaks it or its official status, Dayanidhi Maran has made a fool of himself by just opening his mouth over a non-issue and creating an illusion that he is fighting for judicious use of taxpayers’ money!

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“Who Got The ₹1 Crore?”: Govt Doctor Dr. Lakshmi Narasimhan’s Widow Confronts Medical Director Over False Claims And Unfulfilled Promises

Dr. Lakshmi Narasimhan, a dedicated government doctor, fought relentlessly for the implementation of Government Ordinance 354 to ensure fair wages and benefits for government doctors, right up until his death on 6 February 2020. However, despite his tireless efforts, the ordinance remains unimplemented. Recently, this issue has sparked widespread criticism, with columns highlighting the inefficiency and neglect of both the government and the Tamil Nadu health sector.

In response to the growing criticism, J. Sangumani, the Director of Medical Education and Research, issued a statement, claiming that disagreements between medical associations had stalled the implementation of Government Order 354. He insisted that the government was ready to meet the demand, citing a unanimous opinion on the matter. Sangumani also mentioned that the Minister had directed that jobs be offered to Dr. Lakshmi Narasimhan’s heirs, though he claimed the family had not accepted the offer. Furthermore, he stated that a fund of ₹1 crore had been allocated to the families of six doctors, including Dr. Narasimhan, who died in the line of duty, on 10 January.

This statement quickly became controversial, leading to strong reactions from the doctor’s family. Anuradha, Dr. Narasimhan’s widow, contacted the media, challenging Sangumani’s claims. She accused him of spreading false information, stating that neither the government nor the medical department had taken any concrete action. She also released an audio recording of her conversation with the Director, which went viral, further fueling the controversy.

In the recorded audio conversation, Dr. Lakshmi Narasimhan’s wife, Anuradha, confronted J. Sangkumani, the Director of Medical Education and Research, questioning his claims. She asked, “Sir, you mentioned that you have disbursed one crore to us—can you tell me to whom you gave it?” He replied, “That day a madam came and received, hasn’t she?” She continued, “You hold a prominent position, and someone in your position should be guiding us, could you be spreading such misinformation?” He replied, “Agalyan mentioned that you came that day”, She questioned back, “but who exactly came? You’re respected—can you do like this?” Sangumani tried to overlook by stating, “I’ll check with the office,” She asked, “Can you give misinformation to the media? You should have asked us first or at least verified with someone before sharing such information with the news.” He again tried to evade with response saying, “If I had your number, I would have asked you directly.” Sangumani responded by saying that someone in the office had claimed the money was disbursed, which led him to post it online. Then, she pressed further, asking, “You said we didn’t join despite being offered a job. But did you actually offer us a job?”

In a fit of anger, she said, “I’m going to court, and you shall answer there. Your government has done nothing for us, and it took you four years to provide us with a pension. Isn’t that wrong? Should it really take four years to get a pension?” Director Sangumani repeatedly claimed he would refer the matter to the office, to which she responded, “We are in so much pain. Our loss is not small, and you’re behaving even worse than the previous government. Under whose directive did you issue this denial statement?” She later questioned whether there were any irregularities involved and insisted that G.O. 354 should be implemented. Finally, she asked, “Will I have to come and beg for alms from your minister?”

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Clash Erupts At St. Michael The Archangel Church In Kanyakumari Over Shrine Demolition Plans

A commotion and minor skirmish erupted between two groups—one led by the church priest and the other comprising church members—when the priest’s group attempted to demolish the old shrine in front of the church to expand the St. Michael the Archangel shrine in Mela Asaripallam, Kanyakumari district. The members opposed the demolition and attacked those involved in the expansion efforts. This unrest led to police being deployed to manage the agitated crowd.

The St. Michael the Archangel Church, located near Nagercoil, supports over a hundred families devoted to this historic site. For several years, the church priest has been accused of attempting to demolish an old shrine across the road from the church to build a new one within the church grounds.

This plan faced strong opposition from some church members, who have called for the priest’s transfer, alleging that he fosters division among congregants and engages in money laundering activities. Recently, the church administration, led by the priest, tried to remove the old shrine and held a puja there to pave the way for a new structure. However, the opposing group intervened, leading to heated exchanges between the two factions.

Police, led by Nagercoil ASP Lalith Kumar, were deployed to manage the escalating tensions. One group condemned the priest’s actions and protested outside the church, while the priest’s supporters organized their own demonstrations in response.

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.