Home Blog Page 283

Tiruppur: Ajmal Khan Allegedly Enters Temple In Drunken State, Offers Namaz; Police Probe Underway

A 21-year-old Muslim youth was taken into custody after allegedly entering a temple in an intoxicated state and offering Namaz, causing alarm among devotees in Tiruppur.

The incident took place at the Rajaganapathy Temple located in the Sengunthapuram area on Mangalam Road. The youth, identified as Ajmal Khan, reportedly resides nearby with his parents.

According to reports, Ajmal Khan had consumed alcohol following an argument with his parents on Sunday (26 October 2025) evening. In an inebriated state, he allegedly entered the temple premises, sat inside, and began offering Namaz.

Devotees present at the spot were reportedly shocked and requested him to leave. When he refused and allegedly threatened those who confronted him, a complaint was filed with the local police.

Police have launched an investigation into the incident based on the complaint.

(Source: Dinamalar)

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

All Construction Work On Ayodhya’s Lord Ram Mandir Completed: Ram Janmabhoomi Trust Confirms

All Construction Work On Ayodhya’s Lord Ram Mandir Completed: Ram Janmabhoomi Trust Confirms

The Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra on Monday, 27 October 2025, announced the completion of all construction work on the Lord Ram Mandir in Ayodhya, marking a historic milestone for devotees in India and across the world.

In an official statement, the Trust said, “It is with great joy that we inform all devotees of Prabhu Shri Ramlalla Sarkar that all Mandir construction work has been completed.” The completion covers not only the main temple but also six subsidiary shrines within the Mandir complex, dedicated to Lord Mahadev, Ganesh Ji, Hanuman Ji, Suryadev, Maa Bhagwati, and Maa Annapurna, along with the Sheshavatar Mandir. Flags and kalash (pinnacles) have been installed atop all these temples.

The Trust further announced that seven mandapas (pavilions) honoring figures associated with the Ramayana – Rishi Valmiki, Rishi Vashishtha, Rishi Vishwamitra, Rishi Agastya, Nishadraj, Shabari, and Devi Ahilya, have been completed. Additionally, the Sant Tulsidas Mandir is now ready, and statues of Jatayu and the sacred squirrel have been installed within the temple premises.

All works related to the comfort and convenience of devotees such as pathways, lighting, and entry routes have been finalized. Larsen & Toubro (L&T) has completed road and stone flooring works, while GMR Group continues with landscaping and the development of the 10-acre Panchvati area, which includes greenery and gardens.

According to the Trust, the only remaining tasks are those not directly related to public access, such as the 3.5-kilometer boundary wall, trust office, guest house, and auditorium.

With this announcement, Ayodhya moves a step closer to the formal consecration and grand opening of the Shri Ram Mandir, an event seen as the realization of a centuries-old spiritual aspiration for millions of devotees worldwide.

(Source: Zee News)

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

Washington Post’s Latest Hit Job On LIC-Adani Is A Continuation Of Its Pulitzer-Listed Anti-India Series?

In the wake of The Washington Post’s 24 October 2025 report titled “India’s $3.9 billion plan to help Modi’s mogul ally after U.S. charges,” political and media circles in India have raised questions about the publication’s credibility and its pattern of negative coverage on Indian affairs. The report alleged that the Indian government orchestrated a ₹33,000 crore ($3.9 billion) Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) bailout for the Adani Group, a claim swiftly rejected by both LIC and government officials as baseless.

Former LIC Chairman Siddhartha Mohanty described the report as “a misleading narrative,” asserting that LIC’s investment decisions are governed by the LIC Act and by SEBI and IRDAI regulations that ensure independence from political influence. Officials have reiterated that LIC’s investments are guided by rigorous risk assessment and policyholder safety, not by political considerations.

Contrary to the Washington Post’s claims, LIC’s financial data show robust health. Its equity portfolio rose from ₹2.55 lakh crore in 2013–14 to ₹13.01 lakh crore in 2024–25, delivering record profits of ₹48,151 crore in FY 2024–25, an 18% year-on-year increase. LIC’s annual investment outlay exceeds ₹5.5 lakh crore, while its holdings in the Adani Group comprise only about 4.5% of its total equity and less than 2% of Adani’s debt exposure. Officials have clarified that the alleged ₹5,000 crore “bailout” was in fact a routine bond subscription, backed by AAA ratings and market-standard yields.

The Adani Group, which faced extensive scrutiny after the 2023 Hindenburg report, was cleared of systemic wrongdoing by SEBI. Since then, it has attracted substantial global investment, including a $1 billion qualified institutional placement oversubscribed by international firms such as Goldman Sachs and Nomura. LIC, meanwhile, has recorded net gains on its Adani-linked investments.

Pattern Of Anti-India Reporting

Critics of the Washington Post report argue that it fits into a recurring pattern of anti-India coverage by the U.S. outlet. Observers have noted that every finalist from The Washington Post in the 2024 Pulitzer Prize International Reporting category centered on negative portrayals of India. The series, which accused Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government of undermining democracy and pressuring U.S. tech firms, was shortlisted for its reports such as “Inside the vast digital campaign by Hindu nationalists to inflame India,” “How India tamed Twitter and set a global standard for online censorship,” and “India targets Apple over its phone hacking notifications.”

Among the reporters credited was Pranshu Verma, who also authored the latest Adani-LIC story.

Verma’s earlier work, “Rising India, Toxic Tech,” was celebrated by Western media but criticized in India for what detractors described as “neo-colonial framing.”

This latest report marks the third major story in recent years from U.S. outlets alleging impropriety involving Adani, after a string of Washington Post articles in 2023 that drew on Hindenburg’s short-seller claims. Those reports ceased following Hindenburg’s shutdown in January 2025.

Critics suggest that the fake Adani narrative serves as a proxy for a larger geopolitical agenda, portraying India’s economic independence as a threat to Western influence. They point to a broader trend in which American media and institutions, including the Pulitzer committee, appear to reward coverage that paints India’s rise in negative light.

Indians argue that The Washington Post’s October 2025 story is part of a coordinated campaign to discredit India’s growth trajectory and its leading enterprises. They contend that LIC’s financial resilience and the transparency of its investment practices refute allegations of cronyism. The Ministry of Finance has not ruled out seeking clarification from the publication regarding its sourcing and verification methods.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

Scottish YouTuber Callum Mill With Whom ISI Agent Jyoti Malhotra Vlogged In Pakistan Reportedly In India On Tour

YouTuber With Whom Jyoti Malhotra Vlogged In Pakistan Reportedly In India Now

In a development that has triggered widespread scrutiny online, Scottish travel vlogger Callum Mill, known for his YouTube channel Callum Abroad, is in India on a tourist visa this year. The entry comes despite Mill’s documented links to Haryana-based YouTuber Jyoti Malhotra, who was arrested in May 2025 on charges of spying for Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI).

Social media users raised concerns about Mill’s ongoing presence in India, pointing to his past association with Malhotra and the Pakistani sponsorship of his travels. Screenshots circulated online showed that several of his Pakistan videos were produced in collaboration with Swiftnine Ltd, a Lahore-based travel agency alleged to have links to Pakistan’s intelligence establishment.

Following the backlash, Mill reportedly locked his social media accounts.

Instagram
X account

Even his YouTube has videos only from 4 months ago.

YouTube

The 2025 Pakistan Connection

Mill’s connection to Malhotra first surfaced in May 2025, when Indian media reported on a video showing the two meeting at Anarkali Bazaar in Lahore. The video, verified by NDTV, showed Malhotra walking through the market surrounded by at least six armed men carrying AK-47 rifles and wearing jackets labelled “No Fear.”

In the footage, Mill, who identified himself as a Scottish YouTuber, asked Malhotra about her visit to Pakistan. She confirmed it was her first time meeting him and described Pakistan’s hospitality as “great.” When Mill inquired why she was accompanied by armed escorts, he remarked on camera, “She’s the one with the guys, with all the security. Look at all the guns she’s got surrounding her — six gunmen surrounding her.”

 The presence of armed guards around Malhotra, contrasted with Mill’s solo travel, raised questions about the VIP treatment she appeared to receive. Later investigations revealed that Malhotra had attended high-profile parties in Pakistan and had been in contact with security and intelligence officials. Police sources said she continued communicating with them after returning to India.

Malhotra’s Arrest and Investigations

Jyoti Malhotra was arrested earlier this year by Indian authorities for allegedly passing sensitive information to Pakistan. Her digital devices were seized, and investigators are examining evidence of financial irregularities and suspicious foreign funding.

Police sources said Malhotra’s lavish lifestyle including first-class flights, luxury hotel stays, and high-end dining was inconsistent with her known income. Investigators believe she travelled to Pakistan on a sponsored trip, and later made a similar luxury visit to China, where she was again seen travelling in chauffeur-driven cars and visiting upscale jewellery outlets.

Concerns Over India’s Visa Screening

Mill’s recent arrival in India on a tourist visa has prompted public criticism of India’s visa vetting process. Commentators questioned how a foreign national with known links to an accused ISI agent and with visa sponsorship from a Pakistani firm was cleared for entry.

Online users also pointed to content patterns on Mill’s YouTube channel, contrasting his portrayal of India and Pakistan. His videos from India from the past include captions such as “BJP rally is so chaotic” and “Ganga river is so polluted,” whereas his Pakistan videos are titled “Beauty of Azad Kashmir” and “Pakistani hospitality.”

He has been badmouthing India in almost all his videos.

He also refers to Pakistan Occupied Kashmir as Azad Kashmir.

This has led to further questions about whether a tourist visa holder is permitted to make political commentary or refer to Jammu and Kashmir as “Indian-occupied Kashmir”, terminology often used in Pakistani propaganda.

Several users have called for the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) and the National Investigation Agency (NIA) on social media, urging authorities to investigate Mill’s activities, revoke his visa, and blacklist his passport. Some have described the episode as an intelligence lapse, given the existing red flags from his prior association with Malhotra and the sponsorship of his travels by a Pakistani agency.

At the time of publishing this article, there has been no official statement from the MEA, the Home Ministry, or Indian intelligence agencies regarding Mill’s visa status or his movements within India.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

Bangladesh: Yunus-Led Interim Govt To Give “Red-Carpet Welcome” To Radical Islamist Preacher Zakir Naik

In a significant departure from previous policy, Bangladesh’s interim government, led by Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus, is preparing to give controversial Islamic preacher and wanted Indian fugitive Zakir Naik a red-carpet welcome, marking a dramatic policy reversal nine years after the Dhaka terror attack that led to his ban. The visit, scheduled from 28 November to 20 December 2025, will be Naik’s first in Bangladesh and marks a notable reversal from the Sheikh Hasina administration’s long-standing ban on his activities.

According to organisers, the tour has received official approval and logistical support from government officials. Naik is expected to address large gatherings and deliver religious sermons at multiple venues across the country during his stay.

The decision represents a striking shift from Bangladesh’s earlier stance. Following the July 2016 Holey Artisan Bakery terror attack in Dhaka, the Hasina government had banned Naik’s television network, Peace TV, after one of the attackers reportedly told investigators he had been influenced by Naik’s sermons available online. The preacher left India soon after the incident and has since lived in Malaysia, where he obtained permanent residency.

Naik faces multiple charges in India under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and sections of the Indian Penal Code (now replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita) for allegedly promoting enmity among communities and delivering hate speeches. The National Investigation Agency (NIA) continues to pursue his extradition, but Malaysia has so far declined India’s requests.

Bangladesh’s clearance for the tour follows Naik’s high-profile visit to Pakistan in 2024, where the government extended official hospitality. During that trip, he was photographed meeting senior members of the banned terror group Lashkar-e-Taiba, including commander Muzammil Iqbal Hashmi, Muhammad Harris Dhar, and Faisal Nadeem; all of whom were designated as international terrorists by the U.S. Treasury Department in 2008.

Video footage verified by India Today showed Naik embracing these individuals at Lahore’s historic Badshahi Mosque, where he addressed a massive gathering of more than 150,000 people under tight security arranged by the Lahore police. Naik also met Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif during that visit.

The Yunus government’s decision to host Naik has sparked questions about Dhaka’s evolving religious and diplomatic posture. Analysts note that this move could have regional implications, potentially straining relations with India, which continues to seek Naik’s return to face trial on terrorism-related charges.

(Source: India Today)

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

Islamo-Communist NYC Mayoral Candidate Zohran Mamdani Says Free Public Transport Will Reduce Crimes; NYC’s 1980s Free Transit Experiment Contradict His Claims

Zohran Mamdani Says Free Public Transport Will Reduce Crimes; NYC's 1980s Free Transit Experiment Contradict His Claims

In an undated video, New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani is seen making his pitch for a plan to make public buses in the city safer. He says, “You have a farebox on a bus. It increases the site of tension, of conflict, of assault. When you remove that farebox, what you find is a safer experience, not just for the riders but also for the operators.”

However, there is proof that the opposite – enforcing fares – actually improves public safety in public transport systems.

Let us take the example of an experiment done in the 1980s in the same city.

Historical data from New York City’s 1980s free-transit experiment, combined with contemporary analyses of proposed fare-free systems of Mamdani, reveal significant financial, operational, and safety challenges. While free public transport is often promoted as a progressive measure to enhance accessibility and in Mamdani’s case – to prevent crimes, the evidence from past trials and budget projections indicates that such policies can undermine system stability and safety if implemented at scale.

Revenue Loss

The foremost disadvantage is the severe loss of fare-based revenue. In modern terms, Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani’s proposed free-bus plan would cost the MTA approximately $600–$800 million annually, funds otherwise allocated to maintenance, infrastructure upgrades, and security. During the 1980s experiment, the MTA recorded a $1 million loss in a single night of free rides, reinforcing long-standing concerns over fiscal viability.

Overcrowding and Unmanageable Ridership

Fare removal historically triggered an unexpected surge in ridership. In 1984, free-fare nights produced passenger volumes “much heavier than anyone anticipated,” overwhelming staff and police resources. The resulting congestion strained both physical infrastructure and service schedules, demonstrating that fare elimination can reduce efficiency in already burdened systems.

Vandalism and Disorder

Contemporary reports described free buses and trains as “rolling parties.” The absence of fare barriers attracted unruly crowds, leading to vandalism, broken windows, slashed seats, and littering. Transit authorities were forced to deploy additional police units, incurring further operational costs.

Safety and Crime Concerns

Crime rates spiked sharply during the free-fare period. Recorded incidents included 55 felonies and 29 arrests, compared to 33 felonies and 15 arrests the previous year. Officials acknowledged that many trains became chaotic, delayed, or required police intervention, undermining passenger safety and public confidence. This works directly opposite to what Mamdani claims.

Extra Cleanup and Maintenance Costs

Even without major damage, higher ridership led to significant sanitation burdens. Reports cited “a lot of dirty buses,” with increased trash collection, wear and tear, and mechanical strain.
Maintenance teams faced elevated post-event workloads, inflating overall costs.

Administrative and Operational Burden

Implementing and supervising a fare-free system, even temporarily, demanded extensive coordination. The MTA characterized the 1984 program as a “disaster” due to logistical overload, requiring additional personnel, planning, and policing.

Questionable Impact on Policy Goals

The 1984 free-fare initiative was intended to curb drunk driving, yet commuter railways, where most such incidents occurred, opted out. The program failed to meet its stated objective, suggesting that fare abolition may not effectively target social or behavioral outcomes it purports to address.

Risk of Political Tokenism

Free transit initiatives often serve as populist gestures rather than sustainable policy tools. While temporarily popular, they can compromise financial accountability and long-term service quality.
Even Carol Bellamy (former President of City Council in NY), an early supporter of the 1984 plan, later opposed making buses permanently fare-free, acknowledging the fiscal impracticality.

So, Mamdani is wrong there – absolutely wrong, to suggest that free transport will reduce crimes.

(Source: Vital City)

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

If Hypocrisy Had A Face: Islamist Terror Supporter Zohran Mamdani Decries “Indignity” For Muslims In New York, But Will Never Speak Of The Plight Of Religious Minorities In Islamic Countries

Following New York mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani’s recent remarks about “Muslim indignities” in America, he shared a nearly 7-minute video on his “dream for Muslims in New York City.”

Sharing the video on his social media handles, he wrote, “The dream of every Muslim is simply to be treated the same as any other New Yorker. And yet, for too long, we have been told to ask for less than that, and endure hatred and bigotry in the shadows. No more.”

In the video, Mamdani reflected on personal experiences of discrimination and criticized political opponents for spreading Islamophobic rhetoric during the campaign. Mamdani recalled advice he received early in his political career from a community elder who suggested he conceal his Muslim identity for safety. He described this as a lesson passed down through generations, that Muslims in New York could only find safety “in the shadows.” He said recent political attacks had revived that same fear, alleging that former governor Andrew Cuomo, radio hosts, and candidates Curtis Sliwa and Eric Adams had made or endorsed false claims linking him to terrorism. He referred to campaign advertisements and push polls that, according to him, portrayed him as a threat, mocked his religious practices, or depicted his candidacy as a plane heading toward the World Trade Center. He said such portrayals contributed to a climate in which anti-Muslim bigotry had become normalized. Speaking directly to Muslim New Yorkers, Mamdani invoked examples from his own life and those of his supporters, citing the fear experienced by Muslim women wearing hijab, profiling at airports, and harassment of mosque communities. He said that although he had been spared the most violent expressions of hate, “to be Muslim in New York is to expect indignity.” Mamdani said he initially sought to build a campaign of universality rather than one centered on faith, but concluded that remaining silent about discrimination risked sending the wrong message to young Muslims. He described Islamophobia as one of the few issues uniting politicians across party lines, saying it persisted as “a shared language of New York politics.”

He also accused elected officials of openly engaging in anti-Muslim speech without consequence, claiming that some had even sold merchandise calling for his deportation. He said more than a million Muslims in the city were made to feel like “guests in their own home.” Mamdani framed his campaign as a test of whether New York was ready to reject such attitudes, calling on residents to “step into the light” and reject political fearmongering. Mamdani concluded by saying he would not hide his identity, faith, or practices during the remaining days of the election campaign.

In response, netizens in the US shared experiences of how non-Muslims were/are treated in Islamic countries. Lisa Cusack, Chair of the LAGOP Assembly District 44, responded to Mamdani’s speech by citing her own family’s history of discrimination in a Muslim-majority country. She said her father’s Christian family faced property confiscation, special taxes for being non-Muslim, exclusion from government jobs, and threats of mob violence. “None of this is done to Muslims in America, and everybody knows it,” she wrote on social media.

Historical records support such experiences. Coptic Christians in Egypt were required to pay the jizya tax from the 7th century until the mid-19th century—a levy imposed on non-Muslims as both a financial burden and a marker of subordination. While it granted limited protection, it institutionalized second-class status for religious minorities.

In Turkey, the 1942 Wealth Tax (Varlık Vergisi), enacted under the secular Republican People’s Party, targeted non-Muslim Armenians, Jews, and Greeks with taxes up to 232% of their declared assets, compared to just 4.94% for Muslims. Those unable to pay had their property seized and were sent to harsh labor camps where many perished. Historians describe it as an “economic genocide” that destroyed minority livelihoods and accelerated their mass exodus.

Beyond historical cases, persecution continues in several Muslim-majority countries. In Pakistan, Hindus and Christians frequently face forced conversions, blasphemy accusations, and targeted killings. According to rights groups, scores of underage Hindu girls are abducted each year, coerced into converting to Islam, and married to their captors. Temples and churches are periodically vandalized, and legal recourse for victims remains limited.

In Bangladesh, similar patterns have persisted. This was seen especially after the 2023 coup in the country when Hindu homes and temples were attacked during communal violence. This is seen especially following political unrest or rumors of alleged insults to Islam on social media. Human rights monitors report that intimidation and land-grabbing have forced thousands of Hindus to migrate or conceal their identity to avoid retaliation.

In Nigeria, Islamist militant groups such as Boko Haram and ISWAP have targeted Christian communities, killing and displacing thousands in a campaign of terror spanning more than a decade.

Image Source: X

While Muslims like Zohran living in Western democracies enjoy full citizenship rights and constitutional protection, non-Muslim minorities in several Muslim-majority countries continue to face systemic discrimination, violence, and erasure.

And this Islamist terror supporter will never have the morality and honesty to talk about it.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

‘Karnan’ Paati Appeals To Collector, Criticises DMK Government Over Garbage Dump In Tirunelveli

‘Karnan’ Grandmother Actress Appeals To Collector, Criticises DMK Government Over Garbage Dump In Tirunelveli

In an emotional video appeal that directly mirrors the themes of the 2021 film Karnan directed by Mari Selvaraj, the old lady who played the role of a grandmother in the film, has publicly criticized the DMK-led state government over the plight of marginalized communities living near garbage dumps in Tirunelveli.

In an emotional video appeal, the elderly lady delivered a poignant monologue, pleading for the district collector to witness the squalid conditions firsthand.

Standing amid piles of waste, the woman repeatedly urged district officials to visit the area and witness the residents’ hardships. “Ask the Collector to come, bring him by the hand, let him see our situation,” she said(sang), recalling the suffering of families living amid filth, smoke, and stagnant rainwater.

She sang, “Ask the Collector to come if you see him, bring the Collector here, let him see our condition, ask him to come. I’m repeating the lines I performed in Karnan about the hardships we endure. Ask the Collector to come, bring him by the hand, let him see our situation, ask him to come. Let him see our suffering; bring the Collector by the hand, let him see our plight. Let him witness the tears shed in this slum; let the Collector come and answer those tears. Ask him to come, bring him by the hand. My children, all of them, burned by the fire in the hut, all the kids struggled; I couldn’t even walk but they told me to speak up for our people. I’m speaking directly to the Collector, ask him to come. Bring the Collector here by the hand so he can see our situation, ask him to come. Those who throw us aside as trash and label us as troublemakers; bring the Collector here so he can witness it himself. I’m reciting this with emotion; the Collector must come. I am performing again the speech I delivered in Karnan. Ask the Collector to come if you see him. This merciful Collector, bring him by the hand to see us. We live amid smoke and filth, caught between misery and rain, without protection. If our children are hurt, there is nowhere for us to run. On those days, we sing our struggles, but no one among us is privileged. Come see our huts, Collector, you absolutely must come. I am shedding tears as I say this; you must come here and see our cave and our garbage. Collector, greetings to you, come please, we welcome you.”

The video has since gone viral on social media, drawing sharp parallels between the song Kanda Varachollunga in “Karnan” and the ongoing struggles of numerous communities across Tamil Nadu who live in proximity to overflowing landfills and garbage dumps.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

Zohran Mamdani Caught Lying About His ‘Hijab-Wearing Aunt’ 9/11 Story, His Aunt Allegedly Never Wore A Hijab Nor Lived In NYC In 2001

New York City Mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani seems to be trying to milk his identity as a Muslim whenever he speaks to the Muslim community during his campaign.

Mamdani has come under scrutiny following questions about a personal story he shared while addressing Muslim voters. Mamdani, the Democratic nominee, made the remarks outside a Bronx Mosque, where he spoke about what he described as “indignities” faced by Muslims in New York after the September 11 attacks.

Surrounded by Muslim community leaders, Mamdani said, “I want to speak to the Muslims of New York City.” In the next few seconds, in what seems like pretence to shed a few tears, he then spoke of the “memory of his aunt”, who stopped taking the subway after September 11. He said, “I want to speak to the memory of my aunt, who stopped taking the subway after September 11 because she did not feel safe in her hijab.” He also recounted allegedly being advised to conceal his religious identity when he first entered politics, describing these experiences as shared lessons among Muslim New Yorkers. Mamdani added that “over these last few days, these lessons have become the closing messages of Andrew Cuomo, Curtis Sliwa, and Eric Adams.”

However, an examination of Mamdani’s family history appears to contradict the details of his story.

Ater extensive review, it appears Zohran Mamdani has three aunts – two of whom are Hindu (from his mother’s side), making the hijab reference inapplicable, while the only Muslim aunt, according to public records and biographical information, is not known to wear a hijab and has never been a resident of New York City.

Further reporting indicates that during the period in question, his aunt was living in Tanzania. Records show she resided there from January 2000 until at least December 2003, meaning she was not in New York City before, during, or after the 9/11 attacks.

Image Source: X
Image Source: Devex

The fact-checking investigation concludes that the individual Mamdani referred to as his aunt “who was scared of taking the bus wearing her hijab” is a person who, according to available information, does not wear the hijab and was not living in the United States at the time.

Image Source: X

(Source: NDTV)

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

“Will You Accept If It Happened In Your Family?” Director Mohan G Kshatriyan Slams “Dude” Film That Glorifies Adultery

"Can You Accept This If It Happened In Your Family?" Director Mohan G Kshatriyan Slams "Dude" Film That Glorifies Adultery

Filmmaker Mohan G Kshatriyan, known for his films like Draupathi, Bakasuran, Rudra Thandavam, has expressed concern over the themes portrayed in the recent Tamil film Dude. Speaking to Tamil Janam, Mohan said that while open discussion on ideas and philosophies is essential, certain justifications shown in cinema could send misleading messages to younger audiences.

He said, “You can talk about any philosophy – about Periyar, or about Scholar Annadurai. You can discuss their principles; you can internalize those and have conversations about them. Everyone has the right to deliberate on ideas, that right cannot be denied. So, there’s nothing wrong in having these discussions. But what’s interesting about this particular film is, when such characters are created in the movie, usually the film keeps it negative or doesn’t provide justification. But the director here is quite a young guy – perhaps at his age, he doesn’t fully grasp the gravity. He’s actually justified the story he’s presented.”

Explaining the theme of the film, he said, “Essentially, two people fall in love from a very young age. It’s a blood relation, like cousins. At one point, when their love isn’t accepted, immediately the girl finds another lover within six months. When the wedding is about to happen with the new lover, she tells this to the hero. To unite with her old lover, she arranges a fake wedding with the new lover, and the interval of the film comes after that. Up to that point, the movie was very good. The screenplay remained engaging throughout. But in the second half, there’s a subject that seems extremely unpleasant; it’s hard to see how this is possible in real life. Pradeep Ranganathan is a really good actor; he created sympathy for the character and kept us invested in the film. It makes you want that character do whatever is necessary to achieve this goal. But if you look closely, after the child from the new relationship is born and the marriage is over, the hero puts his initials and gives permission for the girl and the new husband to live together in his house. This is repulsive. It’s hard for families watching this film in theaters, not to frown.”

Expressing his thoughts, he said, “The point of this interview is to say: If your children watched this film on their own, it’s important that you have a healthy debate with them. What did they take away from the movie? What mindset are they going to carry for the next 10 or 20 years? Again, I want to stress – they justify this strange notion of sacrificing your own life for your lover to let them live with someone else. That’s what’s justified in the film, which is a very wrong idea to pass on to the next generation. So, if parents see their kids watched the movie alone, have a discussion. Or better, watch the movie together, see these problematic themes, and open up a discussion; take it as a good opportunity for dialogue. That’s how this movie should be watched. The director’s justification is incorrect. There are many Tamil movies that have sparked such debates, like “Andha Ezhu Naatkal” and in most of K. Balachander’s films. In those films, the hero’s character would be portrayed as a villain, and the heroine’s character as a flawed or problematic one. They highlight that such things should not happen in society. But here, the hero and the director just go ahead with whatever they please. In today’s times, after losing phone contact for six months, just meeting at a wedding and discussing these things is not realistic, but that’s the director’s viewpoint.”

He further added, “There’s also a storyline where, after an abortion, it’s declared that the child will not be born again; this is just something the director put in for the narrative. There’s another plot thread about going abroad which was very forced. It’s pushing things as progressive, but it’s not something you can readily accept. Ultimately, it’s up to the audience to decide; I’m sharing my own views. To parents: if your kids watch this film, have a good discussion with them, it’ll be beneficial for you. And about the creators of the film—if something similar happened in their own families, think about what decisions they would make. Can you accept this if it happened to your family? So “Dude” has been well received, and has sparked major discussion among people. Through Sarathkumar’s character, the film addresses honor killings, which is very welcome. If, say, there was no love between the hero and heroine, and he sacrificed for them to be together, maybe it could be accepted. But if there was actual romantic feeling, it is disgraceful. So, the film has created a discussion. I urge parents and children to use this as a chance for healthy debate and understanding.”

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.