Home Blog Page 227

Madurai Bench Of Madras High Court Orders Removal Of Dravidianist Propaganda Film ‘Bad Girl’ Teaser From All Social Media Platforms

vetrimaaran bad girl madurai bench of madras high court varsha bharath

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has directed the removal of all video teasers of the film Bad Girl from social media platforms.

The film, produced by Dravidianist director Vetrimaaran under his Cross Root Film Company and directed by Varsha Bharath, features Anjali Sivaraman in the lead role. The cast also includes Shanti Priya, Saranya Ravichandran, Hrithu Haroon, Deejay, Sasank Pommettipalli, among others. The production team had earlier announced a theatrical release date of 5 September.

However, Bad Girl has been mired in controversy since the release of its teaser. The latest legal challenge comes from a petition filed by three individuals, including Ramkumar and Ramesh Kumar from Sankarankoil, who approached the Madurai Bench alleging that the teaser contains inappropriate and obscene visuals involving minors and young girls.

Responding to the petition, the court has instructed the central government to take immediate action to remove the teaser from all digital platforms, including YouTube. Furthermore, the court has advised preventive measures to avoid similar content being shared in the future. With this legal hurdle, questions have now emerged over whether the film will be able to release on its scheduled date.

Dravidianist propaganda movie Bad Girl

Highly controversial Dravidianist propaganda movie Bad Girl, certified U/A by the Censor Board, is set to hit theatres on 5 September 2025. Directed by Varsha Bharath and backed by Dravidianist filmmaker Vetrimaaran in collaboration with Bollywood director Anurag Kashyap, the film has faced backlash since its teaser release on 26 January 2025.

The Bad Girl is less a coming-of-age story and more an ideological statement meant to reinforce anti-Brahmin narratives under the guise of empowerment. The teaser introduces audiences to a Tamil Brahmin girl, played by Anjali Sivaraman, who openly expresses her desire for a boyfriend, setting off a journey through her adolescence and college years marked by societal judgment and emotional conflict. The teaser culminates in a scene reminiscent of the 2020 “Thaali Bajao” ritual during the COVID pandemic, depicting traditional Brahmin practices seemingly to ridicule them.

Produced under Grass Root Film Company, Bad Girl has been labeled by detractors as another attempt to push Dravidian ideological propaganda, particularly targeting Brahmin culture.

Backlash From The Film Industry

Actress and former Bigg Boss Tamil contestant Sanam Shetty strongly condemned the film, accusing it of glamorizing rebellion, promiscuity, and substance abuse among minors. She noted that the portrayal sends an unhealthy message to impressionable adolescents and slammed the industry for overlooking deeper gender inequality issues.

Taking to X on 18 February 2025, she stated, “#BADGIRL Teaser is NOT a BOLD Example.. It’s a #BAD Example! #Freedom of choice and #GenderEquality concepts are wrongly portrayed in case of #Minors here! #Legally#Ethically and even #Medically it sends a terribly #wrong message to the already influenceable adolescent children! Extremely disappointed with the so called Responsible Film Makers funding and supporting this Film. Do you agree with me?”

Later speaking to reporters, she said, “Equality doesn’t mean sleeping with multiple people, smoking cigarettes or ganja. Equality means asking us with equal opportunities. If you ask whether there’s equal opportunity between men and women, the answer is no. Take our industry, for example. Are the salaries given to male and female actors the same? No. Is the way male and female actors are approached the same? No. I’m speaking from personal experience. When we think they call us to act in movies, instead they call us for sleeping with them. This is the approach. Equality is needed here and you should speak for this. If you’re suggesting schoolgirl to sleep with ten people, smoke cigarette, ganja and  consume alcohol what kind of thinking is that? Hair”

Similarly, Director Mohan G Kshatriyan, known for films like Bakasuran and Draupathi, also weighed in, accusing Vetrimaaran and Kashyap of recycling anti-Brahmin tropes for cinematic appeal. In a sarcastic post, he said, Portraying a brahmin girl personal life is always a bold and refreshing film for this clan. What more can be expected from vetrimaran, Anurag kasyap & Co.. Bashing Brahmin father and mother is old and not trendy.. Try with your own caste girls and showcase it to your own family first.

Legal Pushback

The Tamil Nadu Brahmin Association (THAMBRAAS) has issued a legal notice to Vetrimaaran, asserting that the film insults their community and contributes to cultural erosion. According to their complaint, the film’s protagonist a Tamil Brahmin schoolgirl is portrayed engaging in relationships, alcohol consumption, and other behaviors the group deems derogatory and misleading.

The notice alleges that Bad Girl violates Article 19 of the Indian Constitution, which allows freedom of expression but with reasonable restrictions. It further cites Section 294 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) Act, 2023, for obscene representation, especially concerning the use of “Iyer Bashai” (Brahmin dialect) and the depiction of Brahmin rituals in a negative light.

The association urged the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) in Chennai to deny certification to the film, calling its content culturally divisive and offensive. The Nadar community has also voiced concerns, stating that the teaser normalizes immoral behavior among schoolgirls and spreads a misleading message to youth.

(With Inputs From Thanthi)

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Physically-Challenged Scheduled Caste Student Allegedly Expelled After Caste-Based Harassment At Govt School In Sivaganga District

In a deeply troubling incident, parents have alleged that a differently-abled Scheduled Caste student in Class 5 was expelled from Kannamangalam Panchayat Union Middle School in Sivaganga district after enduring caste-based harassment by school staff.

The student, Ajay Kumar, hails from Kannamangalam village near Ilayankudi and has been under the care of his aunt following the loss of his mother. According to the complaint, both the class teacher Manimekalai and the headmistress Anusuya subjected the child to repeated discrimination. It is alleged that the student was made to sit separately in the classroom, was verbally abused with casteist remarks, and was eventually barred from entering the school premises.

In a viral video, a student shared his plight and read an English text fluently. He pleaded for the opportunity to continue his studies, stating, “My name is Ajay Kumar. I have one eye that can see, and the other eye cannot see. I don’t have a mother. Only my father is there, and he’s is not well. If I study… because I study, they chased me out. But if you let me study, I will study well. But they expelled me from school.” 

The student’s father further stated in a formal complaint to the Principal’s Special Division that he was pressured to transfer his son to another school and coerced into signing a transfer certificate. He also claims that he was threatened with legal action and told the boy could be placed in a juvenile home if he did not comply.

Following these serious allegations, the District Education Officer (DEO) launched an inquiry. The investigation confirmed that Ajay Kumar had been issued a transfer certificate and is now enrolled at Sacred Heart Middle School in Idakkattur.

However, the DEO has now directed that Ajay Kumar be re-admitted to Kannamangalam Panchayat Union Middle School if he wishes to return, ensuring his right to education at the institution is upheld.

(With Inputs From IE Tamil)

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Petition Filed In Madurai Bench Against DMK’s ‘Oraniyil Tamil Nadu’ Campaign For Illegally Harvesting Aadhaar, Voter ID, And Personal Data To Enroll Citizens As DMK Members Without Consent

madurai bench of madras high court dmk oraniyil tamil nadu

A petition has been filed with the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, seeking action against the DMK’s General Secretary over alleged unauthorized collection of Aadhaar and other personal data from the public under the banner of the party’s membership campaign, “Oraniyil Tamil Nadu.” The petitioner has also called for a ban on the collection of Aadhaar numbers, mobile numbers, and OTPs for political purposes.

The plea was filed by Rajkumar, a resident of Sivaganga district, who claims that DMK functionaries have been visiting homes as part of a state-wide drive to recruit members. According to the petition, party members have been requesting sensitive documents such as Aadhaar cards, voter ID, bank account copies, and mobile numbers from residents. Rajkumar alleges that those who hesitate or refuse are being intimidated with threats specifically that government welfare benefits, including the ₹1,000 monthly scheme for women, may be discontinued if they don’t cooperate.

He further claims that once people share their mobile numbers, they start receiving OTP messages, followed by notifications stating that they have been added as DMK members often without their consent. Stickers bearing the Chief Minister’s image and the campaign name are also reportedly being affixed to homes without permission.

The petition argues that using personal data, particularly Aadhaar information, for political recruitment or campaigning is not only unethical but violates constitutional rights, including the right to privacy and individual freedom. Rajkumar is requesting that,

  • The DMK be prohibited from collecting Aadhaar and personal data for any political purpose.
  • The data already collected be permanently destroyed.
  • The Central Government and the UIDAI (Unique Identification Authority of India) investigate the matter.
  • Appropriate legal action be taken against those responsible, including the party’s General Secretary.

The case is expected to be heard in court shortly.

(With Inputs From Dinamalar)

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Gujarat Leads In Optimising Technology For Faster And Efficient Judicial Process 

Gujarat has taken the lead in optimising technology usage for faster and efficient judicial procedures, said a report.

With close coordination between police, jails, and the judiciary, the state government has facilitated the production of prisoners before the court through video conferencing, making the process easy and less cumbersome.

This approach has led to significant progress in presenting a large number of prisoners from state jails before the courts through the video conferencing (VC) system, thereby saving manpower, time, and resources of the police department.

The process of producing prisoners before the courts through video conferencing got firmed up after a decision was taken in 2022 to install about 1,100 video conferencing (VC) units across the courts. Of these, 23 software-based VC systems were allocated specifically to jails.

At present, 83 video conferencing systems are operational in jails across Gujarat. According to data from the Gujarat Prisons Department, adopting this system has shown positive results. Between January and June 2024, 40,633 prisoners (29 per cent) were produced before the courts through video conferencing by all jails under the department’s jurisdiction.

This number increased to 53,672 prisoners (41 per cent) during the same period in 2025, reflecting growing usage and subsequent success of the system. The effective implementation of this system has saved manpower, time, and resources for the police department.

It has also allowed the redeployment of personnel earlier assigned to custody duties, thus improving overall departmental efficiency. This system has played a key role in accelerating the judicial process, ensuring timely justice for victims and fair punishment for criminals. With Gujarat leading others in using video conferencing for court hearings, this reflects the state government’s commitment to strengthening the judiciary system through the use of technology.

–IANS

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“Illegal Infiltrators Will Be Dealt With..”: PM Modi’s Big Statement On Illegal Infiltrators

The Central government will deal with the illegal infiltrators in West Bengal as per the provisions of the Constitution, despite attempts by Trinamool Congress to protect them, Prime Minister Narendra Modi said on Friday while addressing a rally organised by the BJP’s West Bengal unit at the industrial township of Durgapur in West Burdwan district.

According to PM Modi, while Bengalis are being treated with respect in the BJP-ruled states, in West Bengal, the people of the state are suffering because of the patronage that the illegal infiltrators have been receiving from the ruling dispensation and the state administration.

“The illegal infiltrators are being provided with fake Indian identity documents in West Bengal. The entire ecosystem has been developed in West Bengal to encourage illegal infiltration. These illegal infiltrators are threats to national security. They are threats to Bengali culture. Trinamool Congress had put the honour of the state at stake just because of narrow political motives,” the Prime Minister said.

According to him, while the real intention of Trinamool Congress had been clear to the entire country, they had started a new front in support of the illegal infiltrators. Trinamool Congress is also challenging Constitutional provisions and Constitutional bodies. “But I want to say clearly that those are not Indian citizens, and those who are illegal infiltrators will be dealt with as per Constitutional provisions,” said the Prime Minister.

Political observers believe that PM Modi’s reference to the issue of illegal infiltration was a subtle reply to the current stand taken by West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee and Trinamool Congress on the issue of alleged harassment of Bengali-speaking people in BJP-ruled states after being branded as illegal Bangladeshi infiltrators.

“The roots of the BJP are in West Bengal. So Bengalis are immensely respected in BJP-ruled states.BJP had given Bengali the status of a classical language. BJP identifies Bengali language as a legacy of rich cultural heritage,” the Prime Minister said.

–IANS

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Tamil Nadu Nadar Sangam Slams DMK MP Tiruchi Siva For Defamatory Remarks Against Kamarajar; Demands His Removal And Arrest

tiruchi siva nadar sangam

The Tamil Nadu Nadar Sangam has issued a strong condemnation of DMK Deputy General Secretary and Rajya Sabha MP Tiruchi Siva following his controversial remarks about the late former Chief Minister K. Kamaraj. Speaking at a DMK party gathering in Perambur, Siva alleged that Kamaraj couldn’t sleep without air conditioning and praised former DMK leader Karunanidhi for ensuring AC was installed wherever Kamaraj stayed, a comment widely seen as a bid to elevate Karunanidhi at Kamaraj’s expense.

Reacting sharply to this, Tamil Nadu Nadar Sangam President Muthu Rameshu Nadar released a video statement, calling the remarks defamatory and deeply disrespectful to the legacy of Perunthalaivar Kamaraj.

In his statement, Rameshu Nadar demanded immediate action from the Tamil Nadu Chief Minister, saying,Trichy Siva, a DMK Rajya Sabha member and DMK Deputy General Secretary, has spoken in a manner that taints the fame of Perunthalaivar Kamarajar and has spoken slanderously about him. On behalf of the Tamil Nadu Nadar Sangam and the followers of Perunthalaivar Kamarajar, we express our strong condemnation to him. We urge the Honorable Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu to immediately remove Trichy Siva from his party position and his Member of Parliament position. Both positions must be removed.” He further added that the remarks warrant criminal action, “Furthermore, as he had spoke slanderously about Perunthalaivar Kamarajar, we demand that he be arrested and imprisoned. We request that you take these actions immediately. Failing that, we wish to state that crores of Perunthalaivar Kamarajar’s followers will launch a massive protest.”

What Exactly Did Tiruchi Siva Say?

During the party meeting, Tiruchi Siva shared an anecdote allegedly told to him by late DMK leader Karunanidhi. He recounted, “When I was around 23 or 24, Kalaignar (Karunanidhi) would take me in his car and recount some events. Some people would question why he was telling these things to a young kid. But he knew I would speak about them in public meetings and convey them effectively to the people. He would tell me many such stories. One day, he told me this, ‘Kamarajar has organized condemnation meetings all over Tamil Nadu against electricity shortage. Kamarajar would get an allergy if he didn’t have air conditioning. So, he (Karunanidhi) ordered that all the visitors’ bungalows where he stayed be equipped with air conditioning. Even though he (Kamaraj) was speaking against him, considering his health, I made sure all those bungalows had air conditioning.”

Siva then shared another story from the Emergency period, “During the Emergency, they were desperate to arrest him but couldn’t do it in Tamil Nadu. Just then, he was about to leave for an event in Tirupati. A message went from the Chief Minister’s office, saying, ‘Please don’t go to Tirupati.’ He retorted, ‘I’m not a DMK member; I’m a Congress member, Who is he to tell me that tell me I can’t go?’ Then, he told, ‘I’m not a DMK leader, I’m the Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu. My order is that you shouldn’t go there.’ Immediately, he shot back, ‘What? You’re ordering me? I’m the one who gave up that chair! Is this guy so big that he can order me around? I’m going!’ So, thalaivar called Rajaram Naidu and said, ‘Please make him understand. I’m not a big shot who can order him around. There’s nothing above him. The Central Government is desperate to arrest him. As long as he’s within Tamil Nadu’s borders, I will protect him. If he crosses this border and goes to Tirupati, which is in Andhra, I won’t be able to save him if they arrest him. That’s why I asked him not to go.’ It was only then that he (Kamaraj) said, ‘I spoke without understanding him. He has such a big heart. ‘ Finally, holding his hand, before his death, he said, ‘You are the one who must save this country and democracy.’”

These remarks, especially the insinuation about Kamaraj’s reliance on air conditioning, have not sat well with the public or political observers. Many see it as an attempt to undermine Kamaraj’s image as a selfless and simple leader a portrayal that has stood the test of time across party lines.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Madurai Adheenam Head Granted Anticipatory Bail Over Alleged “Inflammatory” Remarks; Court Cites Media Provocation And Lack Of Communal Intent

The Principal District and Sessions Court in Chennai has granted anticipatory bail to Shri Harihara Gnanasambandha Desiga Paramachariar Swamigal, the 293rd Madathipathy of the Madurai Adheenam, in connection with a case filed against him under various sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) for allegedly making inflammatory statements during a media interaction.

The case, being investigated by the Central Crime Branch (Cyber Crime, East Zone), was filed following a press interaction held on 3 May 2025, in which the Swamigal spoke about an alleged road accident that occurred near Ulundurpet on 2 May 2025 while en route to the 6th International Saiva Siddhanta Conference at SRM University.

According to the petitioner, his vehicle was hit by another car that lacked number plates and was driven by individuals “appearing to follow the Islamic faith.” During the press meet, he expressed fear of a potential threat to his life and speculated about the religious identity of the occupants of the other vehicle. These remarks, later circulated on social media, sparked criticism and led to allegations of inciting communal tension.

The learned City Public Prosecutor (CPP) opposed the bail plea, arguing that the Swamigal had irresponsibly linked the incident to a communal conspiracy and referred to Pakistan’s involvement, causing public unrest. The prosecution submitted CCTV footage of the accident, claiming it contradicted the Swamigal’s version and showed his vehicle was at fault. The footage also formed the basis for a separate case registered at Ulundurpet Police Station against the Adheenam’s driver.

However, Principal Sessions Judge S. Karthikeyan, after reviewing the footage and video of the press interaction, observed that the petitioner had made “exaggerated statements” but did not appear to have intended to spread communal hatred. The court remarked that the media had posed leading questions and provoked responses from the Swamigal, effectively contributing to the controversy.

“There is no prima facie evidence that the petitioner had any intention to incite communal violence,” the court held, noting that the complaint was not filed by members of the Islamic community but by a practicing lawyer, R. Rajendiran. The judge further stated that any determination of whether the petitioner’s remarks constituted an offence under Sections 192, 196(1)(a), 353(1)(b), and 353(2) BNS would require trial.

While granting anticipatory bail, the court acknowledged the petitioner’s age (67), his religious stature, and his willingness to cooperate with the investigation via video conferencing. The court imposed conditions including non-interference in the investigation, prohibition on tampering with evidence, and a requirement to remain within his place of residence unless summoned otherwise.

Advocates Ramaswamy Meyyappan and Viyyash Kumar G.V. appeared on behalf of the Swamigal. The bail was granted with directions that he appear before the XI Metropolitan Magistrate within 15 days and furnish sureties.

 

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

The Forgotten Insult: Did Karunanidhi Deliberately Deny Kamarajar A Memorial At Marina Beach?

kamarajar dmk

With DMK MP Tiruchi Siva’s lies about former Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu, Kamaraj (referred to as Kamarajar out of respect), making the headlines over the week, there are some more aspects of how DMK and especially the patriarch Karunanidhi insulted Kamarajar that need to be discussed.

Mocked In Life, Denied Honour In Death

When Kamaraj was alive, the DMK’s mouthpiece Murasoli ran cartoons mocking his appearance, including his skin tone. In death, the insult was worse. On 2 October 1975, Gandhi Jayanti, Kamaraj passed away. A former Chief Minister, freedom fighter, architect of the mid-day meal scheme, and often called the “Kingmaker” of Indian politics, Kamaraj was expected to be honoured with a burial at the Marina, home to the memorial of Karunanidhi’s mentor, C.N. Annadurai.

But Karunanidhi, then the Chief Minister, reportedly refused the request. While some Congress figures like Tindivanam Ramamurthy and A. Gopanna said leaders such as Pazha Nedumaran and Kannadasan had pressed for a Marina burial as reported in The Hindu, Karunanidhi denied it, citing the difficulty of maintaining memorials near the sea.

This justification rings hollow today. Marina later housed the memorials of MGR, Jayalalithaa, and Karunanidhi himself. No such “erosion concerns” were raised then. The real reason appears obvious: Kamaraj was a national icon, not a Dravidian one. His stature didn’t suit Karunanidhi’s political narrative.

Conflicting Claims, Convenient Amnesia

Some journalists and politicians later attempted to reframe the episode, claiming no demand had been made for a Marina burial and that Karunanidhi, in fact, led the state funeral out of respect. Others, like Pazha Nedumaran, the then TNCC secretary, stated that Congress planned to conduct the funeral at Sathyamurthi Bhavan, but Karunanidhi offered Gandhi Mandapam in Guindy as an alternative, as reported in TNIE. Nedumaran apparently said, “Congressmen decided to perform the last rites at Sathyamurthi Bhavan here but it was the then Chief Minister Karunanidhi, who offered land at Gandhi Mandapam to build a memorial for Kamaraj.” 

Gandhi mandapam as consolation prize for passing away on Gandhi Jayanti?

So, which is it? Was a Marina burial demanded and denied? Or did the DMK proactively offer Guindy as a mark of honour? The historical record has been twisted conveniently — sometimes to attack, sometimes to defend.

What remains undisputed is this: Kamaraj, despite his towering legacy, was denied Marina burial by the Karunanidhi government. That decision, whether rooted in vendetta or political insecurity, was an insult.

The Hypocrisy In 2018

Fast-forward to August 2018. Karunanidhi dies. He is not the sitting Chief Minister. By his own standard, that only incumbent CMs deserved Marina, he should not have been buried there. Yet, the DMK demanded a Marina grave, and the AIADMK government initially denied the request.

In a press release, Chief Secretary Girija Vaidyanathan cited legal obstacles and the fact that Karunanidhi was not a serving CM. The government’s counsel even reminded the Madras High Court that Karunanidhi had himself denied Kamaraj the same honour, setting the very precedent now being challenged.

But after a late-night legal battle, the High Court ruled in DMK’s favour. Karunanidhi was laid to rest beside Annadurai, at the Marina. No erosion, no legal impediment, no maintenance woes.

The message seemed unmistakable: rules only apply to your opponents. What was too much for Kamaraj was just right for Karunanidhi.

A Memorial For Some, Not All

Gandhi Mandapam, where Kamaraj was cremated, remains the site for national leaders like Rajaji and Bhaktavatsalam. In contrast, Marina became the pantheon of Dravidian leaders. This segregation, though unspoken, exposes the DMK’s selective reverence.

A freedom fighter, a national builder, and a Chief Minister who transformed Tamil Nadu’s political and educational landscape denied the honour accorded to regional leaders of lesser stature. That is the legacy of Karunanidhi’s politics of memory.

If hypocrisy had a name, it would be the Karunanidhi family itself.

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

‘SP Told Me To Bend Or Be Broken’, Tamil Nadu DSP Says He’s Punished For Integrity, Accuses Senior Officers Of Misusing Power

tamil nadu dsp

In a startling revelation, M. Sundaresan, the Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP) in Mayiladuthurai, has alleged that he faced harassment, humiliation, and repeated transfers at the hands of senior officers after submitting a report to the State Human Rights Commission (SHRC). The report involved accusations of custodial torture of a former MDMK party worker and an electrician in connection with the murder of retired inspector Kasturi Parthasarathy in Kancheepuram, Tamil Nadu.

Sundaresan, a 1996-batch IPS officer currently posted in the Mayiladuthurai District Prohibition Department, claimed his official vehicle was confiscated, leaving him with no choice but to walk to work. He believes this action was retribution for refusing to provide an escort vehicle for DMK Minister Meyyanathan Siva V. He also linked his alleged mistreatment to his rejection of bribes.

Speaking to the media, he said, “On the 5th of July, 2025, my driver, a person named Vadivel, was also in the Bolero vehicle. What he did was, in this district, AR SI Senthil kumar, said that the vehicle was immediately needed for the Honorable Minister  Meyyanathan for his escort duty. I said, ‘According to protocol, it’s not possible to give it.’ Secondly, ‘I am on intensive raid. I cannot give this vehicle. If you want this vehicle, you pass an order. I’ll give the vehicle,’ I told him. For that, AR SI told to Vadivel that, ‘I will talk to your DSP.’ And he also said, ‘You can talk to the DSP.’ Immediately, that AR SI spoke to me, and I refused. After two hours, I, who am from the 1996 batch, I’m a direct SI from the 96th batch, a 2008’s direct SI,  a eighth batch SP Inspector, he tells me, ‘Wherever you are, stay there and send the vehicle immediately.’ I said, ‘You cannot impose this order on me. Only if higher officials tell me, then I can send the vehicle. Without orders, I cannot send it.’ As soon as I said that, within the next 10 minutes, on the mic, Nagaraj from the Control Room, he orders me. He says, ‘Immediately, you go for Tiruchendur security duty.’ I thought, Right, Murugan is calling, and I told it on the mic and went for the security duty on the 5th. I traveled in that same vehicle the same vehicle they asked me for. For almost 400 to 450 kilometers, for three days (5th, 6th, 7th). After that, while I was still there, an order came from the SP’s office. ‘You immediately need to go for Thiruvarur security duty for the Honorable CM.’ Immediately, I reported to the headquarters. That night, I called the Control Room and said, ‘I have reported here. I am giving it at 2 AM on the morning of the 8th’. All the records I am stating are in GD (General Diary), everything is there. Nothing can be hidden or suppressed. All the police personnel and officers in this district know what kind of injustice is happening here.”

Naming specific officials, he said, “The main reasons for this are SP Stalin IPS and Inspector Special Branch Balachandar. We can even accept the SP as an officer, but this Balachandar, he tortures not only me but many officers, prevents them from working, and creates such problems.”

He continued narrating his plight, saying, “Regarding the vehicle, I finished the Thiruvarur duty on the 8th, 9th, 10th. On the 10th night, as soon as I returned, I didn’t even get down at home. They immediately said they needed the vehicle. Even then, I asked, ‘Who needs this vehicle?’ ‘Honorable Minister  Meyyanathan needs the vehicle, sir.’ That ARSI spoke to me, requesting. Even then I said, ‘This vehicle cannot be used for this purpose. It’s not in protocol.’ I was in SP Security, at the highest level in SP. This is not in the security protocol. I said I cannot give the vehicle. Because of repeated requests, I gave the vehicle to the AR SI. But it did not go to the Honorable Minister. They took this vehicle and kept it aside. From the 10th, I had no vehicle. On the 11th, I informed the District SP, ‘Sir, I don’t have a vehicle.’ Everything has a record. Everything is on my mobile phone, recorded, each and everything. I’m telling you another thing: In these eight months, not once has the SP spoken properly to me on the phone. What’s the reason for that, only God knows. But on the 10th, they took the vehicle at night. Until noon on the 11th, the vehicle didn’t come. I informed him that the vehicle hadn’t come. They gave me a vehicle that couldn’t even be driven on the road. What do I say about that vehicle, sir? ‘This vehicle cannot be used,’ my driver, Mani Bharathi, calls and tells me. ‘Sir, this vehicle cannot be used on the road,’ he says. ‘It’s okay, higher officials have given orders, bring the vehicle,’ I said. The vehicle came. As soon as the vehicle came, that night, the Control Room and the District Night Rounds were using that vehicle. The driver says, ‘I can’t drive the vehicle.’ The driver somehow pushed and drove the vehicle, and after a little distance, near the checkpost, at Kollidam, the vehicle stopped. Smoke was coming from the vehicle. I told the Control Room, told the AR SI, no action is taken. It’s not that the vehicle didn’t run that day, the vehicle runs, but it’s not in good condition to drive on the road. If smoke comes from the vehicle, how can one sit and go? Isn’t a driver’s life important to you? Maybe my life is not important to you, but my life is very important to my family. Is it important or not, sir? It is important, my life is very important. So I said, ‘This vehicle cannot be driven.’ Nevertheless, I finished my night rounds until morning with a clear conscience. The next day, I brought that vehicle to the Control Room and parked it. And I informed the SP, ‘Sir, the vehicle cannot be driven, sir. Nothing can be done with the vehicle.’ Immediately, what did he say? He didn’t say any reply, not a single reply. I just continued with my work. I just had to do my duty. I went on a bike, checked everything. This is also known to ADGP Enforcement sir. On the 12th, I went on a bike and checked, put photos, all that is known. But what does this administration say? What does SP sir say? ‘We took this vehicle for CM’s security duty.’ You asked me for this vehicle for Minister Meyyanathan, but then you said you took it for CM’s security duty, and without giving me any vehicle, I moved around on a bike. Everyone knows. I wore a helmet, in uniform, I went on a bike. My driver was there. After that, I was put as a pilot in the contingency convoy for the CM. That means, for the Honorable CM, there will be a separate vehicle, a pilot. This is for night times, if he goes for any emergency, a contingency pilot. I called on the mic and said, ‘Please record it. I have informed the officers on WhatsApp. I don’t have a vehicle, please give me a vehicle.’ The vehicle that was already with me was taken away. Now they are denying me. Sir, they say that he (SP) didn’t snatch the vehicle now, that it’s still with him. Then how did the Tiruchi vehicle come to me? Pay attention everyone. They give me a vehicle from Tiruchi for escort duty that night, and for the whole night and the next morning, I was in that convoy. After driving for two days, they took that vehicle back. After taking the vehicle, that officer, our District Superintendent, he didn’t give me any vehicle. This morning, I’m even calling and asking on mic. ‘Sir, my vehicle hasn’t come. I have to walk to the office. I can’t go on a bike. Traveling 150 km on a bike gives me back pain.’ There’s no response. No response from the Control Room when I called on the mic. I walked.”

He explicitly added two higher officials before concluding, “Two high officials: one, the intelligence officer, IG Senthilvel IPS. The other officer, ADGP Law and Order David Aseervatham. Even saying their names makes me feel uncomfortable.”

He added, “It’s very difficult in the police. It’s very difficult. How can honest officers like us work? Yesterday, the SP Mayiladuthurai called me to his room and spoke to me. Pointing his (middle) finger like this, he said, ‘this finger should bend? If it doesn’t, they will break it.’ How? this a challenge to honesty?”

Sundaresan didn’t stop there. He accused top officials of financial misconduct, asserting that both the Superintendent of Police (SP) and an Inspector in the department were collecting bribes under the pretense of forming ‘special teams’. He called for a full investigation by higher authorities into the actions of these officials, stating, “I’m prepared to face any inquiry.”

Since taking charge of the prohibition unit in November last year, Sundaresan has spearheaded a crackdown on illegal liquor sales shutting down 23 unauthorized TASMAC bars and booking over 1,200 offenders, resulting in the imprisonment of more than 700 individuals. His efforts have been widely appreciated by the public, strengthening suspicions that he is being targeted for carrying out his duties with integrity.

The case has sparked a political controversy. The BJP accused the ruling DMK government of targeting Sundaresan for being honest and unafraid to expose systemic issues. They pointed to the removal of his official vehicle and his sudden transfer as punitive measures.

The AIADMK also criticized the DMK, questioning the treatment of the officer and demanding the immediate restoration of his vehicle and dignity. They urged the Tamil Nadu Director General of Police to ensure Sundaresan is protected from political retaliation.

BJP state president K. Annamalai weighed in on the issue via X (formerly Twitter), alleging that Sundaresan’s transfer was direct retaliation for exposing failings within the police force under the current DMK regime.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Namakkal Kidney Trafficking Scandal: Key Accused, A DMK Functionary, On The Run, Over 90 Women Allegedly Targeted

anandan dmk kidney trafficking namakkal

Namakkal district in Tamil Nadu has become the center of a widening kidney trafficking scandal after a local news investigation revealed that more than 90 women, mostly poor daily wage laborers, were allegedly exploited by an illegal organ trade network operating in the region. It was reported that in Pallipalayam and Kumarapalayam, the surrounding areas of Namakkal district, this kidney trade was taking place actively.

At the centre of the controversy is M. Anandan, a 52-year-old man identified as the key broker, who has now gone into hiding. He is also known as “Dravida Anandan,” the key figure in the racket. He is reportedly a local-level party speaker for the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) in Anampalayam Perur and is currently absconding. Investigators from the Revenue Department, Police Department, and Health Department, divided into three teams, are actively searching for him. His house in the Alampalayam Ayakkattur area, Annai Sathya Nagar, Pallipalayam, was found locked, and his mobile phone has been switched off since the investigation began.

According to preliminary findings, the women’s kidneys were surgically removed at two private hospitals in Trichy – Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Hospital and Siddhar Hospital. These details were confirmed by victims who admitted to selling their kidneys for ₹5 lakh each.

Authorities have also recovered suspicious materials from Anandan’s residence, including forged documents, government seals, and official uniforms. Investigators believe these were used to facilitate the illegal operations under a pretense of legitimacy. There are reports that some of the trafficked kidneys may have been sent to other states and even across the border to Sri Lanka.

Officials say that further details regarding the scale and organization of the racket, including the possible involvement of intermediaries and hospital officials, can only be confirmed once Anandan is apprehended and interrogated. However, law enforcement has noted a significant challenge: most of the women involved are unwilling to file complaints due to fear of legal repercussions and social stigma.

Despite the magnitude of the case and the scale of alleged human rights violations, police sources have stated that action against Anandan may be contingent upon formal complaints being lodged – an unlikely development given the victims’ hesitation.

Authorities Respond with Official Complaint and Government-Led Probe

Following media reports and public outrage, a formal complaint has now been lodged against Anandan at the Pallipalayam police station. The complaint was filed by Dr. Veeramani, the medical officer at the Pallipalayam Government Hospital.

Anandan, originally from Tiruppur, had been residing in Pallipalayam for the past six months, allegedly using the location as a base for his organ trafficking network. A government-led probe headed by Namakkal District Health Services Joint Director Dr. Rajmohan was initiated under the instructions of District Collector Durga Moorthy. Kumarapalayam Taluk Officer Sivakumar and police officials were also part of the investigation team that attempted to locate Anandan at his residence.

Despite attempts, Anandan was not found and remains absconding.

Tamil Nadu Health Minister M. Subramanian responded to the revelations by warning that strict action would be taken against anyone involved in illegal organ trade. “Only voluntary organ donation is legal in Tamil Nadu. Any sale of organs is a serious crime, and those responsible will not be spared,” he said. The Minister added that Tamil Nadu remains a leader in the country for legitimate organ donations and commercial violations would be dealt with severely.

(With inputs from Times Of India)

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.