Home Blog Page 193

How Serial Rage-Baiter And Ultra-Woke ‘Feminist’ Chinmayi Turned A Canadian House Fire Incident Into A Rant Against Brahmins

When a Canadian family lost their home to a fire sparked by Diwali fireworks, the reasonable response would have been to condemn irresponsible behavior and demand accountability. Instead, singer Chinmayi Sripaada saw an opportunity to rage-bait and unleash her pathological anti-Brahminical venom, revealing the stunning intellectual bankruptcy of her worldview.

Her initial tweet demanding that “the Indian community should basically rebuild his house for him” was rightly challenged.

Why should an entire community be held responsible for the actions of a few individuals? This collective guilt narrative is as absurd as demanding the white community fund reforestation for every California wildfire.

But Chinmayi’s true colors emerged when cornered. Like a broken record stuck in a colonial-era groove, she pivoted with the predictability of a conditioned response: “And Brahmins!”

Suddenly, a house fire in Canada became about “Brahminical oppression” – a bizarre logical leap that would embarrass even the most dedicated conspiracy theorist.

The Temple Lie Exposed

When challenged to name a single temple where Brahmins currently prevent entry to other castes, Chinmayi retreated into historical anecdotes from the 11th century. Why? Because she cannot name a single contemporary temple practicing such exclusion. The truth she deliberately ignores facts such as the Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams (TTD) actively sponsoring SC/ST students in Veda Patashalas and appointing SC/ST archakas across Telugu temples, temple entry restrictions today are based on religious protocols that apply to all devotees regardless of caste – Brahmins are barred from entering inside the garbha griha unless they’re performing priestly duties.

The real caste discrimination is seen within SC communities themselves, where sub-castes bar each other from temples – a fact Chinmayi conveniently overlooks.

The Historical Illiteracy Of Selective Outrage

Chinmayi’s historical references betray either shocking ignorance or deliberate deception.

She cites Basaveshwara’s 11th century movement as evidence of “Brahminical oppression,” while ignoring that multiple non-Brahmin scholars and authors flourished in ancient India, educational access wasn’t exclusively Brahmin-dominated as she claims and every major religion historically restricted access – Catholic priests barred serfs, Islamic practices maintained hierarchies, yet she singles out only Brahmins.

Her demand for “reparations from Brahmins” while dismissing calls for accountability from medieval Islamic invaders reveals her selective morality. Why are alleged Brahmin actions from centuries ago condemnable while medieval atrocities get a free pass?

The Reservation Hypocrisy

This “oppression” narrative continues despite Brahmins having faced decades of state-mandated discrimination through reservation quotas in education, jobs, and promotions, age relaxations that disadvantage Brahmin candidates, temple control wrested from Brahmin communities, systemic discrimination justified by the very rhetoric Chinmayi peddles.

Yet she speaks as if Brahmins remain privileged oppressors rather than communities systematically marginalized by the very policies she champions.

The Real Agenda Exposed

Chinmayi’s logic follows a disturbing pattern:

Fire accident in Canada? Punish Brahmins.

Someone fails an exam? Blame Brahmins.

Fictional police brutality in movies? Hang Brahmins.

Rains in Chennai? Blame Brahmins.

This is pathological scapegoating. She is practicing the blame game where every topic inevitably circles back to predetermined conclusions regardless of relevance.

When confronted with facts, Chinmayi will resort to personal attacks and vague historical references rather than addressing contemporary reality. She cannot name specific temples practicing exclusion because such institutional discrimination largely doesn’t exist in modern Hindu temple administration.

The tragedy isn’t just Chinmayi’s manufactured outrage – it’s that she commands a million followers while peddling this divisive hatred. She represents the worst of activist culture: privileged individuals manufacturing grievances to stay relevant while actual communities move toward integration and progress.

Perhaps instead of searching for Brahmins to blame for every global misfortune, Chinmayi should look inward at her own prejudice. The real oppression isn’t in temple corridors – it’s in minds poisoned by ideological hatred that sees every incident through the narrow lens of caste warfare. Would she allow people of all castes into her home, sleep on her bed? Why did she choose to marry someone from her own caste, she could have very well led the reparations and married out of the community?

The Canadian family deserves sympathy, and the responsible individuals deserve legal consequences. What they don’t deserve is becoming pawns in Chinmayi’s tired, fact-free crusade against a community she’s determined to villainize regardless of truth or context.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

Madras High Court Grants Bail To Retired Police Officer R Varadharajan After Over 20 Days In Custody For Social Media Post

On 27 October 2025, Justice K. Rajasekar of the Madras High Court has granted bail to retired police officer and YouTuber R. Varadharajan in what was thought to be in connection with a case filed against him for his online commentary following the Karur stampede tragedy. The court directed him to appear before the investigating officer daily for two weeks.

Varadharajan, aged 71, was arrested on 7 October 2025 by the Chennai South Cyber Crime Police after he allegedly posted defamatory content against Justice N. Senthilkumar of the Madras High Court. His bail plea had earlier been adjourned to Monday, (27 October 2025) extending his incarceration beyond 20 days.

What Court Order Said

Varadharajan, who leads the political outfit Nethaji Makkal Katchi and runs a YouTube channel, was arrested in connection with a First Information Report (FIR) originally registered on December 20, 2024. The case, investigated by the Cyber Crime police, invokes sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and the Information Technology Act, 2000.

The prosecution alleged that videos uploaded by the petitioner in 2024 contained remarks that could “incite violence” and cause law and order problems. They argued that as a retired police officer and political leader, Varadharajan should behave responsibly and objected to his bail, stating the comments were made for political gain.

However, the defense counsel, LV Rohith, argued that no violence had erupted as a result of the comments, which were made the previous year. He contended that the arrest, coming nearly ten months after the FIR was filed, was motivated because Varadarajan had recently commented on a judgment delivered by a sitting judge of the Madras High Court.

In the order accessed by The Commune, Principal Sessions Judge S. Karthikeyan noted that the police had not arrested the petitioner immediately after registering the FIR in 2024. The court observed that “admittedly, no violence was erupted as claimed by the respondent police,” and deemed the arrest after a 10-month lapse as a significant factor in its decision to grant bail.

The court ordered Varadarajan’s release on executing a bond for Rs. 10,000 with two sureties for the like sum. The bail conditions mandate that he must appear before the investigating police daily at 10:00 AM and is prohibited from tampering with evidence or absconding. A breach of these conditions would allow the court to take appropriate action, including the registration of a fresh FIR under Section 269 of the BNS for absconding.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

Tiruppur: Ajmal Khan Allegedly Enters Temple In Drunken State, Offers Namaz; Police Probe Underway

A 21-year-old Muslim youth was taken into custody after allegedly entering a temple in an intoxicated state and offering Namaz, causing alarm among devotees in Tiruppur.

The incident took place at the Rajaganapathy Temple located in the Sengunthapuram area on Mangalam Road. The youth, identified as Ajmal Khan, reportedly resides nearby with his parents.

According to reports, Ajmal Khan had consumed alcohol following an argument with his parents on Sunday (26 October 2025) evening. In an inebriated state, he allegedly entered the temple premises, sat inside, and began offering Namaz.

Devotees present at the spot were reportedly shocked and requested him to leave. When he refused and allegedly threatened those who confronted him, a complaint was filed with the local police.

Police have launched an investigation into the incident based on the complaint.

(Source: Dinamalar)

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

All Construction Work On Ayodhya’s Lord Ram Mandir Completed: Ram Janmabhoomi Trust Confirms

All Construction Work On Ayodhya’s Lord Ram Mandir Completed: Ram Janmabhoomi Trust Confirms

The Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra on Monday, 27 October 2025, announced the completion of all construction work on the Lord Ram Mandir in Ayodhya, marking a historic milestone for devotees in India and across the world.

In an official statement, the Trust said, “It is with great joy that we inform all devotees of Prabhu Shri Ramlalla Sarkar that all Mandir construction work has been completed.” The completion covers not only the main temple but also six subsidiary shrines within the Mandir complex, dedicated to Lord Mahadev, Ganesh Ji, Hanuman Ji, Suryadev, Maa Bhagwati, and Maa Annapurna, along with the Sheshavatar Mandir. Flags and kalash (pinnacles) have been installed atop all these temples.

The Trust further announced that seven mandapas (pavilions) honoring figures associated with the Ramayana – Rishi Valmiki, Rishi Vashishtha, Rishi Vishwamitra, Rishi Agastya, Nishadraj, Shabari, and Devi Ahilya, have been completed. Additionally, the Sant Tulsidas Mandir is now ready, and statues of Jatayu and the sacred squirrel have been installed within the temple premises.

All works related to the comfort and convenience of devotees such as pathways, lighting, and entry routes have been finalized. Larsen & Toubro (L&T) has completed road and stone flooring works, while GMR Group continues with landscaping and the development of the 10-acre Panchvati area, which includes greenery and gardens.

According to the Trust, the only remaining tasks are those not directly related to public access, such as the 3.5-kilometer boundary wall, trust office, guest house, and auditorium.

With this announcement, Ayodhya moves a step closer to the formal consecration and grand opening of the Shri Ram Mandir, an event seen as the realization of a centuries-old spiritual aspiration for millions of devotees worldwide.

(Source: Zee News)

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

Washington Post’s Latest Hit Job On LIC-Adani Is A Continuation Of Its Pulitzer-Listed Anti-India Series?

In the wake of The Washington Post’s 24 October 2025 report titled “India’s $3.9 billion plan to help Modi’s mogul ally after U.S. charges,” political and media circles in India have raised questions about the publication’s credibility and its pattern of negative coverage on Indian affairs. The report alleged that the Indian government orchestrated a ₹33,000 crore ($3.9 billion) Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) bailout for the Adani Group, a claim swiftly rejected by both LIC and government officials as baseless.

Former LIC Chairman Siddhartha Mohanty described the report as “a misleading narrative,” asserting that LIC’s investment decisions are governed by the LIC Act and by SEBI and IRDAI regulations that ensure independence from political influence. Officials have reiterated that LIC’s investments are guided by rigorous risk assessment and policyholder safety, not by political considerations.

Contrary to the Washington Post’s claims, LIC’s financial data show robust health. Its equity portfolio rose from ₹2.55 lakh crore in 2013–14 to ₹13.01 lakh crore in 2024–25, delivering record profits of ₹48,151 crore in FY 2024–25, an 18% year-on-year increase. LIC’s annual investment outlay exceeds ₹5.5 lakh crore, while its holdings in the Adani Group comprise only about 4.5% of its total equity and less than 2% of Adani’s debt exposure. Officials have clarified that the alleged ₹5,000 crore “bailout” was in fact a routine bond subscription, backed by AAA ratings and market-standard yields.

The Adani Group, which faced extensive scrutiny after the 2023 Hindenburg report, was cleared of systemic wrongdoing by SEBI. Since then, it has attracted substantial global investment, including a $1 billion qualified institutional placement oversubscribed by international firms such as Goldman Sachs and Nomura. LIC, meanwhile, has recorded net gains on its Adani-linked investments.

Pattern Of Anti-India Reporting

Critics of the Washington Post report argue that it fits into a recurring pattern of anti-India coverage by the U.S. outlet. Observers have noted that every finalist from The Washington Post in the 2024 Pulitzer Prize International Reporting category centered on negative portrayals of India. The series, which accused Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government of undermining democracy and pressuring U.S. tech firms, was shortlisted for its reports such as “Inside the vast digital campaign by Hindu nationalists to inflame India,” “How India tamed Twitter and set a global standard for online censorship,” and “India targets Apple over its phone hacking notifications.”

Among the reporters credited was Pranshu Verma, who also authored the latest Adani-LIC story.

Verma’s earlier work, “Rising India, Toxic Tech,” was celebrated by Western media but criticized in India for what detractors described as “neo-colonial framing.”

This latest report marks the third major story in recent years from U.S. outlets alleging impropriety involving Adani, after a string of Washington Post articles in 2023 that drew on Hindenburg’s short-seller claims. Those reports ceased following Hindenburg’s shutdown in January 2025.

Critics suggest that the fake Adani narrative serves as a proxy for a larger geopolitical agenda, portraying India’s economic independence as a threat to Western influence. They point to a broader trend in which American media and institutions, including the Pulitzer committee, appear to reward coverage that paints India’s rise in negative light.

Indians argue that The Washington Post’s October 2025 story is part of a coordinated campaign to discredit India’s growth trajectory and its leading enterprises. They contend that LIC’s financial resilience and the transparency of its investment practices refute allegations of cronyism. The Ministry of Finance has not ruled out seeking clarification from the publication regarding its sourcing and verification methods.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

Scottish YouTuber Callum Mill With Whom ISI Agent Jyoti Malhotra Vlogged In Pakistan Reportedly In India On Tour

YouTuber With Whom Jyoti Malhotra Vlogged In Pakistan Reportedly In India Now

In a development that has triggered widespread scrutiny online, Scottish travel vlogger Callum Mill, known for his YouTube channel Callum Abroad, is in India on a tourist visa this year. The entry comes despite Mill’s documented links to Haryana-based YouTuber Jyoti Malhotra, who was arrested in May 2025 on charges of spying for Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI).

Social media users raised concerns about Mill’s ongoing presence in India, pointing to his past association with Malhotra and the Pakistani sponsorship of his travels. Screenshots circulated online showed that several of his Pakistan videos were produced in collaboration with Swiftnine Ltd, a Lahore-based travel agency alleged to have links to Pakistan’s intelligence establishment.

Following the backlash, Mill reportedly locked his social media accounts.

Instagram
X account

Even his YouTube has videos only from 4 months ago.

YouTube

The 2025 Pakistan Connection

Mill’s connection to Malhotra first surfaced in May 2025, when Indian media reported on a video showing the two meeting at Anarkali Bazaar in Lahore. The video, verified by NDTV, showed Malhotra walking through the market surrounded by at least six armed men carrying AK-47 rifles and wearing jackets labelled “No Fear.”

In the footage, Mill, who identified himself as a Scottish YouTuber, asked Malhotra about her visit to Pakistan. She confirmed it was her first time meeting him and described Pakistan’s hospitality as “great.” When Mill inquired why she was accompanied by armed escorts, he remarked on camera, “She’s the one with the guys, with all the security. Look at all the guns she’s got surrounding her — six gunmen surrounding her.”

 The presence of armed guards around Malhotra, contrasted with Mill’s solo travel, raised questions about the VIP treatment she appeared to receive. Later investigations revealed that Malhotra had attended high-profile parties in Pakistan and had been in contact with security and intelligence officials. Police sources said she continued communicating with them after returning to India.

Malhotra’s Arrest and Investigations

Jyoti Malhotra was arrested earlier this year by Indian authorities for allegedly passing sensitive information to Pakistan. Her digital devices were seized, and investigators are examining evidence of financial irregularities and suspicious foreign funding.

Police sources said Malhotra’s lavish lifestyle including first-class flights, luxury hotel stays, and high-end dining was inconsistent with her known income. Investigators believe she travelled to Pakistan on a sponsored trip, and later made a similar luxury visit to China, where she was again seen travelling in chauffeur-driven cars and visiting upscale jewellery outlets.

Concerns Over India’s Visa Screening

Mill’s recent arrival in India on a tourist visa has prompted public criticism of India’s visa vetting process. Commentators questioned how a foreign national with known links to an accused ISI agent and with visa sponsorship from a Pakistani firm was cleared for entry.

Online users also pointed to content patterns on Mill’s YouTube channel, contrasting his portrayal of India and Pakistan. His videos from India from the past include captions such as “BJP rally is so chaotic” and “Ganga river is so polluted,” whereas his Pakistan videos are titled “Beauty of Azad Kashmir” and “Pakistani hospitality.”

He has been badmouthing India in almost all his videos.

He also refers to Pakistan Occupied Kashmir as Azad Kashmir.

This has led to further questions about whether a tourist visa holder is permitted to make political commentary or refer to Jammu and Kashmir as “Indian-occupied Kashmir”, terminology often used in Pakistani propaganda.

Several users have called for the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) and the National Investigation Agency (NIA) on social media, urging authorities to investigate Mill’s activities, revoke his visa, and blacklist his passport. Some have described the episode as an intelligence lapse, given the existing red flags from his prior association with Malhotra and the sponsorship of his travels by a Pakistani agency.

At the time of publishing this article, there has been no official statement from the MEA, the Home Ministry, or Indian intelligence agencies regarding Mill’s visa status or his movements within India.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

Bangladesh: Yunus-Led Interim Govt To Give “Red-Carpet Welcome” To Radical Islamist Preacher Zakir Naik

In a significant departure from previous policy, Bangladesh’s interim government, led by Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus, is preparing to give controversial Islamic preacher and wanted Indian fugitive Zakir Naik a red-carpet welcome, marking a dramatic policy reversal nine years after the Dhaka terror attack that led to his ban. The visit, scheduled from 28 November to 20 December 2025, will be Naik’s first in Bangladesh and marks a notable reversal from the Sheikh Hasina administration’s long-standing ban on his activities.

According to organisers, the tour has received official approval and logistical support from government officials. Naik is expected to address large gatherings and deliver religious sermons at multiple venues across the country during his stay.

The decision represents a striking shift from Bangladesh’s earlier stance. Following the July 2016 Holey Artisan Bakery terror attack in Dhaka, the Hasina government had banned Naik’s television network, Peace TV, after one of the attackers reportedly told investigators he had been influenced by Naik’s sermons available online. The preacher left India soon after the incident and has since lived in Malaysia, where he obtained permanent residency.

Naik faces multiple charges in India under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and sections of the Indian Penal Code (now replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita) for allegedly promoting enmity among communities and delivering hate speeches. The National Investigation Agency (NIA) continues to pursue his extradition, but Malaysia has so far declined India’s requests.

Bangladesh’s clearance for the tour follows Naik’s high-profile visit to Pakistan in 2024, where the government extended official hospitality. During that trip, he was photographed meeting senior members of the banned terror group Lashkar-e-Taiba, including commander Muzammil Iqbal Hashmi, Muhammad Harris Dhar, and Faisal Nadeem; all of whom were designated as international terrorists by the U.S. Treasury Department in 2008.

Video footage verified by India Today showed Naik embracing these individuals at Lahore’s historic Badshahi Mosque, where he addressed a massive gathering of more than 150,000 people under tight security arranged by the Lahore police. Naik also met Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif during that visit.

The Yunus government’s decision to host Naik has sparked questions about Dhaka’s evolving religious and diplomatic posture. Analysts note that this move could have regional implications, potentially straining relations with India, which continues to seek Naik’s return to face trial on terrorism-related charges.

(Source: India Today)

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

Islamo-Communist NYC Mayoral Candidate Zohran Mamdani Says Free Public Transport Will Reduce Crimes; NYC’s 1980s Free Transit Experiment Contradict His Claims

Zohran Mamdani Says Free Public Transport Will Reduce Crimes; NYC's 1980s Free Transit Experiment Contradict His Claims

In an undated video, New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani is seen making his pitch for a plan to make public buses in the city safer. He says, “You have a farebox on a bus. It increases the site of tension, of conflict, of assault. When you remove that farebox, what you find is a safer experience, not just for the riders but also for the operators.”

However, there is proof that the opposite – enforcing fares – actually improves public safety in public transport systems.

Let us take the example of an experiment done in the 1980s in the same city.

Historical data from New York City’s 1980s free-transit experiment, combined with contemporary analyses of proposed fare-free systems of Mamdani, reveal significant financial, operational, and safety challenges. While free public transport is often promoted as a progressive measure to enhance accessibility and in Mamdani’s case – to prevent crimes, the evidence from past trials and budget projections indicates that such policies can undermine system stability and safety if implemented at scale.

Revenue Loss

The foremost disadvantage is the severe loss of fare-based revenue. In modern terms, Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani’s proposed free-bus plan would cost the MTA approximately $600–$800 million annually, funds otherwise allocated to maintenance, infrastructure upgrades, and security. During the 1980s experiment, the MTA recorded a $1 million loss in a single night of free rides, reinforcing long-standing concerns over fiscal viability.

Overcrowding and Unmanageable Ridership

Fare removal historically triggered an unexpected surge in ridership. In 1984, free-fare nights produced passenger volumes “much heavier than anyone anticipated,” overwhelming staff and police resources. The resulting congestion strained both physical infrastructure and service schedules, demonstrating that fare elimination can reduce efficiency in already burdened systems.

Vandalism and Disorder

Contemporary reports described free buses and trains as “rolling parties.” The absence of fare barriers attracted unruly crowds, leading to vandalism, broken windows, slashed seats, and littering. Transit authorities were forced to deploy additional police units, incurring further operational costs.

Safety and Crime Concerns

Crime rates spiked sharply during the free-fare period. Recorded incidents included 55 felonies and 29 arrests, compared to 33 felonies and 15 arrests the previous year. Officials acknowledged that many trains became chaotic, delayed, or required police intervention, undermining passenger safety and public confidence. This works directly opposite to what Mamdani claims.

Extra Cleanup and Maintenance Costs

Even without major damage, higher ridership led to significant sanitation burdens. Reports cited “a lot of dirty buses,” with increased trash collection, wear and tear, and mechanical strain.
Maintenance teams faced elevated post-event workloads, inflating overall costs.

Administrative and Operational Burden

Implementing and supervising a fare-free system, even temporarily, demanded extensive coordination. The MTA characterized the 1984 program as a “disaster” due to logistical overload, requiring additional personnel, planning, and policing.

Questionable Impact on Policy Goals

The 1984 free-fare initiative was intended to curb drunk driving, yet commuter railways, where most such incidents occurred, opted out. The program failed to meet its stated objective, suggesting that fare abolition may not effectively target social or behavioral outcomes it purports to address.

Risk of Political Tokenism

Free transit initiatives often serve as populist gestures rather than sustainable policy tools. While temporarily popular, they can compromise financial accountability and long-term service quality.
Even Carol Bellamy (former President of City Council in NY), an early supporter of the 1984 plan, later opposed making buses permanently fare-free, acknowledging the fiscal impracticality.

So, Mamdani is wrong there – absolutely wrong, to suggest that free transport will reduce crimes.

(Source: Vital City)

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

If Hypocrisy Had A Face: Islamist Terror Supporter Zohran Mamdani Decries “Indignity” For Muslims In New York, But Will Never Speak Of The Plight Of Religious Minorities In Islamic Countries

Following New York mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani’s recent remarks about “Muslim indignities” in America, he shared a nearly 7-minute video on his “dream for Muslims in New York City.”

Sharing the video on his social media handles, he wrote, “The dream of every Muslim is simply to be treated the same as any other New Yorker. And yet, for too long, we have been told to ask for less than that, and endure hatred and bigotry in the shadows. No more.”

In the video, Mamdani reflected on personal experiences of discrimination and criticized political opponents for spreading Islamophobic rhetoric during the campaign. Mamdani recalled advice he received early in his political career from a community elder who suggested he conceal his Muslim identity for safety. He described this as a lesson passed down through generations, that Muslims in New York could only find safety “in the shadows.” He said recent political attacks had revived that same fear, alleging that former governor Andrew Cuomo, radio hosts, and candidates Curtis Sliwa and Eric Adams had made or endorsed false claims linking him to terrorism. He referred to campaign advertisements and push polls that, according to him, portrayed him as a threat, mocked his religious practices, or depicted his candidacy as a plane heading toward the World Trade Center. He said such portrayals contributed to a climate in which anti-Muslim bigotry had become normalized. Speaking directly to Muslim New Yorkers, Mamdani invoked examples from his own life and those of his supporters, citing the fear experienced by Muslim women wearing hijab, profiling at airports, and harassment of mosque communities. He said that although he had been spared the most violent expressions of hate, “to be Muslim in New York is to expect indignity.” Mamdani said he initially sought to build a campaign of universality rather than one centered on faith, but concluded that remaining silent about discrimination risked sending the wrong message to young Muslims. He described Islamophobia as one of the few issues uniting politicians across party lines, saying it persisted as “a shared language of New York politics.”

He also accused elected officials of openly engaging in anti-Muslim speech without consequence, claiming that some had even sold merchandise calling for his deportation. He said more than a million Muslims in the city were made to feel like “guests in their own home.” Mamdani framed his campaign as a test of whether New York was ready to reject such attitudes, calling on residents to “step into the light” and reject political fearmongering. Mamdani concluded by saying he would not hide his identity, faith, or practices during the remaining days of the election campaign.

In response, netizens in the US shared experiences of how non-Muslims were/are treated in Islamic countries. Lisa Cusack, Chair of the LAGOP Assembly District 44, responded to Mamdani’s speech by citing her own family’s history of discrimination in a Muslim-majority country. She said her father’s Christian family faced property confiscation, special taxes for being non-Muslim, exclusion from government jobs, and threats of mob violence. “None of this is done to Muslims in America, and everybody knows it,” she wrote on social media.

Historical records support such experiences. Coptic Christians in Egypt were required to pay the jizya tax from the 7th century until the mid-19th century—a levy imposed on non-Muslims as both a financial burden and a marker of subordination. While it granted limited protection, it institutionalized second-class status for religious minorities.

In Turkey, the 1942 Wealth Tax (Varlık Vergisi), enacted under the secular Republican People’s Party, targeted non-Muslim Armenians, Jews, and Greeks with taxes up to 232% of their declared assets, compared to just 4.94% for Muslims. Those unable to pay had their property seized and were sent to harsh labor camps where many perished. Historians describe it as an “economic genocide” that destroyed minority livelihoods and accelerated their mass exodus.

Beyond historical cases, persecution continues in several Muslim-majority countries. In Pakistan, Hindus and Christians frequently face forced conversions, blasphemy accusations, and targeted killings. According to rights groups, scores of underage Hindu girls are abducted each year, coerced into converting to Islam, and married to their captors. Temples and churches are periodically vandalized, and legal recourse for victims remains limited.

In Bangladesh, similar patterns have persisted. This was seen especially after the 2023 coup in the country when Hindu homes and temples were attacked during communal violence. This is seen especially following political unrest or rumors of alleged insults to Islam on social media. Human rights monitors report that intimidation and land-grabbing have forced thousands of Hindus to migrate or conceal their identity to avoid retaliation.

In Nigeria, Islamist militant groups such as Boko Haram and ISWAP have targeted Christian communities, killing and displacing thousands in a campaign of terror spanning more than a decade.

Image Source: X

While Muslims like Zohran living in Western democracies enjoy full citizenship rights and constitutional protection, non-Muslim minorities in several Muslim-majority countries continue to face systemic discrimination, violence, and erasure.

And this Islamist terror supporter will never have the morality and honesty to talk about it.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

‘Karnan’ Paati Appeals To Collector, Criticises DMK Government Over Garbage Dump In Tirunelveli

‘Karnan’ Grandmother Actress Appeals To Collector, Criticises DMK Government Over Garbage Dump In Tirunelveli

In an emotional video appeal that directly mirrors the themes of the 2021 film Karnan directed by Mari Selvaraj, the old lady who played the role of a grandmother in the film, has publicly criticized the DMK-led state government over the plight of marginalized communities living near garbage dumps in Tirunelveli.

In an emotional video appeal, the elderly lady delivered a poignant monologue, pleading for the district collector to witness the squalid conditions firsthand.

Standing amid piles of waste, the woman repeatedly urged district officials to visit the area and witness the residents’ hardships. “Ask the Collector to come, bring him by the hand, let him see our situation,” she said(sang), recalling the suffering of families living amid filth, smoke, and stagnant rainwater.

She sang, “Ask the Collector to come if you see him, bring the Collector here, let him see our condition, ask him to come. I’m repeating the lines I performed in Karnan about the hardships we endure. Ask the Collector to come, bring him by the hand, let him see our situation, ask him to come. Let him see our suffering; bring the Collector by the hand, let him see our plight. Let him witness the tears shed in this slum; let the Collector come and answer those tears. Ask him to come, bring him by the hand. My children, all of them, burned by the fire in the hut, all the kids struggled; I couldn’t even walk but they told me to speak up for our people. I’m speaking directly to the Collector, ask him to come. Bring the Collector here by the hand so he can see our situation, ask him to come. Those who throw us aside as trash and label us as troublemakers; bring the Collector here so he can witness it himself. I’m reciting this with emotion; the Collector must come. I am performing again the speech I delivered in Karnan. Ask the Collector to come if you see him. This merciful Collector, bring him by the hand to see us. We live amid smoke and filth, caught between misery and rain, without protection. If our children are hurt, there is nowhere for us to run. On those days, we sing our struggles, but no one among us is privileged. Come see our huts, Collector, you absolutely must come. I am shedding tears as I say this; you must come here and see our cave and our garbage. Collector, greetings to you, come please, we welcome you.”

The video has since gone viral on social media, drawing sharp parallels between the song Kanda Varachollunga in “Karnan” and the ongoing struggles of numerous communities across Tamil Nadu who live in proximity to overflowing landfills and garbage dumps.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.