Home Blog Page 151

DMK Mulling Rajya Sabha Berth For CM Stalin’s Son-in-Law Sabareesan?

DMK Mulling Rajya Sabha Berth For CM Stalin’s Son-in-Law Sabareesan?

The DMK leadership is reportedly considering fielding Chief Minister MK Stalin’s son-in-law, Sabareesan, for one of the four Rajya Sabha seats from Tamil Nadu that are set to fall vacant soon.

According to party sources, the terms of six Rajya Sabha MPs from Tamil Nadu, including AIADMK’s M Thambidurai, Tamil Maanila Congress leader GK Vasan, and DMK members T Siva, Anthiyur Selvaraj, NR Elango, and Dr. Kanimozhi, will end on 1 April 2026.

Of the four seats expected to go to the DMK based on Assembly strength, the party leadership is said to be planning to allocate two to alliance partners. One seat is likely to be offered to the Congress, while the other may go either to the Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi (VCK) or the Communist Party of India (CPI), sources indicated.

Discussions are reportedly underway within the party on allotting one of the remaining two seats to Sabareesan and the other to the DMK’s current Delhi representative, A.K. Vijayan.

Party insiders said some district secretaries have urged Chief Minister Stalin that if Lok Sabha MP and DMK Deputy General Secretary Kanimozhi were to take on a larger role in Tamil Nadu’s state politics, Sabareesan could be positioned to handle responsibilities in Delhi.

Following these internal consultations, the party leadership is said to be exploring the possibility of nominating Sabareesan to the Rajya Sabha and ensuring his election to represent the party in the national capital.

An official announcement from the DMK is awaited.

Source: Dinamalar

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Minors Reportedly Assaulted By Ganja-Addicted Minors; BJP Leader SG Suryah Slams Rising Drug Menace Under DMK Rule

Minors Reportedly Assaulted By Ganja-Addicted Minors; BJP Leader SG Suryah Flags Drug Abuse Among Youth

A video allegedly showing minors assaulting other minors (younger than them) while under the influence of narcotic substances in Ondipulinayakkanur village of Virudhunagar district has surfaced on social media, triggering concern and political reactions.

BJP leader SG Suryah shared the video on his social media handles and condemned the incident. In his post, he expressed shock over the visuals, stating that the footage of school-age children engaging in brutal violence while reportedly intoxicated was disturbing and raised serious questions about the spread of drug abuse among minors.

He alleged that narcotic substances, including ganja, were easily accessible across Tamil Nadu and described the situation as a failure of governance. Referring to a recent controversy involving the growth of a ganja plant within the premises of Stanley Medical College Hospital in Chennai, he argued that such incidents reflected administrative lapses in curbing drug circulation.

Suryah further questioned the functioning of the state police and accused the ruling government of failing to safeguard students and youth from substance abuse. He called upon Tamil Nadu Chief Minister MK Stalin to take responsibility for the situation and to respond on measures being taken to control narcotics and protect the future of young people in the state.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

‘Sanskrit Is An Invented Language, Cannot Be Mother Tongue’, Says Dravidian Stock ASI Official Amarnath Ramakrishna

'Sanskrit Is An Invented Language', Says ASI Official Amarnath Ramakrishna, Speaks Like A Dravidianist Hate Monger mother tongue

Senior Indian archaeologist and officer with the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI), Amarnath Ramakrishna, has landed himself under the spotlight for making remarks that resemble a Dravidianist hate monger.

Amarnath Ramakrishna, an ASI officer, speaking at a public programme, referred to research presented by foreign scholars claiming that inscriptions in the ancient Tamil-Brahmi (“Tamili”) script were found in nearly 30 locations inside tombs in Egypt’s Valley of the Kings, dating to the New Kingdom period.

He said, “The script called “Tamili” found in Egyptian tombs was explained to us today. Those who said it are not Indians/Tamilians; foreign scholars said it. Two foreign scholars read the first paper at that seminar. They said: In Egypt’s Valley of the Kings (New Kingdom), Tamili inscriptions are engraved in 30 places on Egyptian tombs. Especially, they read “Sikai Kottran”. That “Kottran” word is found in our Pugalur inscription near Karur in Tamil Nadu. People from here went there for trade and wrote their names. Even today, we write our names—go to any temple, old temple or old building, school; we don’t stay quiet, we write our names with charcoal whether it sticks or not.”

He continued, “Writing names like that happened 2,000 years ago. That’s the news found here in Egypt. Egyptian kings built pyramids around 1800 BCE; they used cuneiform letters. Later, traders from here wrote Greek letters too, about 2,000 Greek letters found. Studying those Greek letters, two foreign scholars discovered Tamili too. They read and showed “Tamili Tamili.” They read “Sikai Kottran.” Seeing that, media went viral calling it “Sikai.” “Sikai” is Sanskrit word, they say. Is there any instance where “Sikai” is a Sanskrit word? I don’t know. Sanskrit is an invented language; Sanskrit cannot be a mother tongue because it is a language a woman cannot speak, so it cannot possibly be a mother tongue. A language originates from a woman; only a language born from a woman goes equally to men and women. Sanskrit is a religious ritual language, compiled solely to praise God. That language can only work for man-to-man and not man-to-woman. There is no chance for it to be a mother tongue. It’s constructed from many languages, possibly including Tamil words, shining as Sanskrit today.”

He continued, “Claiming “Sikai” from that language is wrong. Tamil scholars must research if “Sikai” is Tamil. It will surely confirm as Tamil, that’s the firm answer. Starting such research will greatly help showcase Tamil’s glory worldwide, which I state here.”

Why Amarnath Ramakrishna Speaks Like A Dravidianist Hate Monger

The Dravidianist hate for Sanskrit is well-known. By referring to Sanskrit as an ‘invented’ language and one that allegedly cannot be spoken by women, Ramakrishna has echoed the Dravidianist tropes.

Dismissing Sanskrit as “not a mother tongue” or reducing it to a purely ritual language ignores its vast literary, historical, and inscriptional corpus. It is noteworthy that:

Sanskrit possesses one of the world’s richest classical literatures spanning philosophy, science, poetics, grammar, and statecraft.

It has played a foundational role in decoding India’s ancient history through inscriptions, copper plates, and temple records.

Tamil Nadu’s Sanskrit Epigraphical Record

Historians note that Tamil Nadu itself holds one of the largest corpora of Sanskrit inscriptions in India, found alongside Tamil inscriptions on temple walls, hero stones, copper plate grants, and royal edicts.

For centuries, Tamil dynasties, including the Pallavas, Cholas, and Pandyas, patronised Sanskrit in administration, religion, and royal titulature, often using it in tandem with Tamil. Epigraphists stress that without Sanskrit proficiency, reconstructing large portions of South Indian political, social, and religious history would be severely impaired.

Ramakrishna’s remarks echo Dravidianist talking points, particularly those narratives that frame Sanskrit as alien, imposed, or exclusionary. Such binaries overlook the long history of linguistic coexistence and mutual patronage between Tamil and Sanskrit traditions. Officials occupying institutional positions, especially in archaeology, must maintain academic neutrality and avoid civilisational or linguistic denigration.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

The Hindu’s Frontline De-Hinduizes Thirupparankundram Lord Murugan As Tribal Murukan, Here’s The Truth From Sangam Literature

A recent article published in Frontline on the controversy surrounding the lamp-lighting (deepam) dispute at the sacred hill of Tiruparankundram near Madurai has triggered strong criticism from scholars and commentators, who have accused the magazine of presenting a historically skewed narrative on Murugan worship and the hill’s religious history.

Frontline’s Key Claims

The Frontline article situates the present dispute over lighting a deepam on a stone pillar near the Sikandar Badshah dargah within a broader historical and socio-religious framework.

According to the article:

Thirupparankundram hill has functioned for centuries as a shared sacred space, housing the Sri Subramaniya Swamy Temple, Jain relics, and the 13th-century Sikandar Badshah dargah.

The current controversy stems from demands by Hindus to light the Karthigai Deepam on the Deepathoon pillar located near the dargah, and not at the Moksha deepathoon which is a Nayak-era pillar being used currently near the Uchi Pillayar shrine.

The article stresses that the established custom of lighting the lamp on the Nayak-period pillar has been followed for over a century under the supervision of the Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments (HR&CE) Department.

It highlights judicial intervention, including a Madurai Bench order permitting the lighting of the lamp on the contested pillar and subsequent legal escalation between the State government and the judiciary.

Beyond the immediate dispute, the article advances a larger civilisational thesis on Murugan worship. Drawing on academic voices such as Czech Indologist Kamil Zvelebil, it argues that:

Murugan originated as a tribal/Dravidian hill deity known as “Murukan” or “Velan.”

The deity was later absorbed into Sanskritised Hindu polytheism through processes described as “Sanskritisation” and “Brahminisation.”

This integration is portrayed as part of a broader shift that allegedly contributed to the decline of Jainism and Buddhism in Tamil regions.

The article characterises the evolution of Murugan into Skanda/Kartikeya as a “happy blend of two cultures,” symbolised through mythology, ritual transformation, and temple institutionalisation.

Busting The Lies Peddled By Frontline

In reality, the civilisational framing of the article rests on selective scholarship and ideologically loaded terminology.

Reliance on frameworks popularised by figures such as Kamil Zvelebil, particularly terms like “Sanskritisation,” “Hindu appropriation,” and “Vedic influence”, has led to a misreading of primary Tamil sources.

Even a basic reading of Sangam literature undermines the claim that Murugan and Skanda/Kartikeya were historically separate theological constructs.

Textual Evidence From Sangam Sources

There are multiple references from classical Tamil works that disprove the Frontline article. Here are a few:

Thirumurugatrupadai describes Murugan being worshipped through Vedic ritual procedures, stating:
“மந்திர விதியின் மரபுளி வழாஅ அந்தணர் வேள்வி ஓர்க்கும்மே” – interpreted as indicating worship through established Vedic mantras without procedural deviation.

Iconographic and theological attributes in Sangam literature align with pan-Indian Skanda traditions, including:

  • Six faces – referenced in Thirumurugatrupadai
  • Vel (spear) as primary weapon – noted in Paripadal
  • Peacock mount – “விரை மயில் மேல் ஞாயிறு” (Paripadal)
  • Rooster emblem – “சேவல் அம் கொடியன்” (Thirumurugatrupadai)

These features correspond closely with sculptural and numismatic depictions of Skanda across northern India such as:

  • Yaudheya coinage from pre-Common Era centuries
  • Kushan-period iconography
  • Gupta-era sculptural traditions

– all of which depict Skanda with similar attributes, suggesting civilisational continuity rather than later assimilation.

Pan-Indian Presence Vs Regional Framing

Let us further disprove the portrayal of Murugan as an exclusively tribal or regional deity.

While Murugan’s association with the kurinji (hill) landscape in Tamil poetic convention is known, it is also noteworthy that Sangam texts reference structured sacred centres such as:

  • Thirupparankundram
  • Tiruchendur
  • Swamimalai

These functioned as organised pilgrimage and worship sites even in the early historic period, contradicting the depiction of a purely tribal cult later institutionalised.

Counter-Framing The “Appropriation” Thesis

Now if the term “appropriation” must be invoked, it may be more applicable to modern academic attempts to confine a widely attested pan-Indian deity within a narrowly regional or racial framework.

Murugan/Skanda/Kartikeya traditions are evidenced across:

  • Multiple linguistic canons
  • Diverse dynastic patronage networks
  • Pan-subcontinental textual traditions

thus, indicating theological continuity rather than cultural absorption.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“Pawan Khera Is A Tattu, A Puppet Of Congress”: Mani Shankar Aiyar Blasts Rahul Gandhi’s Aide Pawan Khera

"Pawan Khera Is A Tattu, A Puppet Of Congress": Mani Shankar Aiyar Blasts Rahul Gandhi's Aide Pawan Khera

Congress leader Mani Shankar Aiyar has stirred fresh controversy within the party after making sharp remarks about several senior Congress colleagues and casting doubt on the party’s electoral prospects in Kerala.

In an exclusive interview with NDTV, the former Union Minister commented on leaders including Shashi Tharoor, Jairam Ramesh and Pawan Khera, while also predicting that the Congress would struggle in the upcoming Kerala Assembly elections due to internal divisions.

Aiyar’s remarks come amid ongoing uproar over his recent praise for Kerala Chief Minister and CPI(M) leader Pinarayi Vijayan, where he had suggested that the Left leader would continue in office after the polls. The Congress has since distanced itself from Aiyar’s statements, with party leaders asserting that he speaks in a personal capacity.

Responding to criticism from Congress spokesperson Pawan Khera on Aiyar not being part of the party, Aiyar said, “Pawan Khera has said two years ago that I do not represent the Congress in any capacity whatsoever. So, it’s not new. He is a tattu (puppet) of the Congress. He’s not a spokesman. He is an inferior IAS officer who has come in here, and he’s been abusing me for the last two years. So why do you expect me to answer that question?”

On the Congress’s prospects in Kerala, Aiyar said, “I want the Congress to win, but I don’t believe it will win, because they are all divided among themselves. I mean, they hate each other much more than they hate the communists. Whereas the communists are a totally united people. They’re a very disciplined party. And they’ve won it twice. It has never happened in the history of Kerala that anti-incumbency doesn’t work. He’s a clerk. How dare he make these repeated announcements about me? If the Congress party cannot find anyone but Pavan Khera to be its spokesman, then it will be in the condition in which it is.”

Aiyar also made pointed remarks about Thiruvananthapuram MP Shashi Tharoor, referring to him as “anti-Pakistan” and suggesting that he harbours ambitions to become the “next foreign minister”.

Commenting on Congress communications chief Jairam Ramesh, Aiyar said he has to “keep his job”.

Aiyar had earlier drawn attention for praising Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan at a Thiruvananthapuram seminar titled “Vision 2031: Development and Democracy”, held months ahead of the Kerala Assembly polls where the Congress-led UDF is set to take on the Left.

At the event, Aiyar said, “I do not know whether this is a compliment or an insult, but I deeply regret the absence of my party colleagues on this occasion, which is a state occasion and therefore, a national occasion.”

A former Panchayati Raj Minister, Aiyar also lauded Kerala’s local governance model, stating, “Therefore, I must fall at your feet, Chief Minister Vijayan, and request you to pick up the baton that the Congress has dropped. Thank you and may Kerala prosper.”

The Congress leadership responded swiftly. Pawan Khera said in a post on X, “Mr. Mani Shankar Aiyar has had no connection whatsoever with the Congress for the past few years. He speaks and writes purely in his personal capacity.”

Jairam Ramesh also countered Aiyar’s assessment, stating, “Let there be no doubt. The people of Kerala will bring the UDF back for more responsible and responsive governance. They also know LDF and BJP are covert partners.”

Source: NDTV

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“Don’t Want Free Money When Govt Is In Debt”: Madurai Man Returns DMK Govt’s ₹5,000 Credited Under Magalir Urimai Thogai Scheme

“We Don’t Take Money For Votes”: Madurai Man Returns ₹5,000 Credited Under Magalir Urimai Thogai Scheme

A social activist from Madurai district has returned the ₹5,000 credited to his bank account under the Tamil Nadu government’s Kalaignar Magalir Urimai Thogai scheme, stating that he believed the disbursal was linked to the upcoming elections.

The DMK government has been providing ₹1,000 per month to eligible women beneficiaries under the Magalir Urimai Thogai scheme. Recently, the Stalin government credited an amount covering the next three months (₹3,000) in advance, along with an additional ₹2,000 announced as special summer assistance. The total ₹5,000 was deposited into beneficiaries’ bank accounts earlier this week.

Shankarapandian, a social activist from Sellur in Madurai district, returned the amount to the Chief Minister’s Special Cell through postal services, stating that his family did not require the funds at present, particularly given what he described as the state government’s existing debt burden.

Speaking about his decision, he said he works as a tiles worker and had come across discussions on social media alleging that the ₹5,000 disbursal was intended to influence voters ahead of elections. He stated that he personally shared that view and felt a sense of moral discomfort in retaining the money.

He further added that his family had never accepted money in exchange for votes and that he returned the amount with his wife’s consent.

Source: Dinamalar

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

MTC Server Glitch Disrupts Ticketing, Commuters Face Inconvenience

MTC Server Glitch Disrupts Ticketing, Commuters Face Inconvenience

Chennai commuters travelling by Metropolitan Transport Corporation (MTC) buses were left stranded and inconvenienced on Monday (16 February 2026) after an unexpected server failure crippled the corporation’s electronic ticketing infrastructure in the city.

Due to the technical snag, ETMs used by conductors became temporarily unavailable, affecting regular ticket issuance. As an interim arrangement, conductors issued manual pre-printed tickets to passengers until the system is restored.

The disruption also affected passengers relying on digital payment modes. MTC said UPI transactions, National Common Mobility Cards (NCMC), and debit and credit card payments could not be accepted at present. The Chennai One app, which facilitates digital ticketing and related services, also remained inaccessible, impacting commuters who use the platform.

The corporation requested passengers to carry cash while availing bus services and expressed regret over the inconvenience caused. It added that technical teams are working to resolve the issue.

MTC clarified that online bus ticket bookings were operating normally and that users of the Chennai One app could continue to book tickets and travel without disruption. Passengers who had purchased ₹1,000 and ₹2,000 bus passes through the app were allowed to travel by entering the OTP. In case of any technical error, commuters were advised to show the valid bus pass displayed on the app to the conductor and continue their journey.

Source: DT Next

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Islamo-Leftist Alleged ‘Fact-Checker’ Zubair Justifies Assault On Journalist Ruchi Tiwari In Delhi University?

Alleged Fact-Checker Zubair Justifies Assault On Journalist Ruchi Tiwari In Delhi University
Background Image Source: X

A woman journalist, Ruchi Tiwari, who was allegedly assaulted while covering a protest at Delhi University’s North Campus on Friday, 13 February 2026, has stated that she was attacked by a large mob and targeted over her caste identity while performing her professional duties.

Quick to justify her assault, alleged fact-checker shared video clippings of hers to ‘prove’ she wasn’t a journalist but ran a ‘propaganda’ YouTube channel.

What Happened

According to Tiwari, the situation escalated when members of the gathering began questioning her about her name and caste. Speaking to ANI, she said, “Video is everywhere, people can judge by themselves as to who provoked whom… I am a journalist who was there to cover the protest. One of the media personnel said my name to draw my attention. I went up to them, they then asked my full name and caste.”

She alleged that the confrontation quickly turned violent. “The entire crowd came towards me and attacked me. This is clear in the video. About 500 people attacked me. They just have fake narrations and fake allegations. The girls around me whispered rape threats in my ears just because I am a Brahmin; ‘aaj tu chal, tera nanga parade niklega,’ is what they said. The men around me were saying that they would teach me a lesson. The girls had held me by the arms and neck. This is an attempt to murder. I had fallen unconscious, but the Police did nothing,” she stated.

Tiwari further alleged that she was singled out because of her caste background and confirmed that an FIR has been registered in connection with the incident. She identifies herself as a ground reporter and runs a YouTube channel.

Recalling the sequence of events, she said, “A boy there was signalling to others to take me away. Did they want to kidnap me?… My clothes were being torn… I was being improperly touched. They were goons, they cannot be students… I was attacked due to my caste. Nobody supported me, only a few Law Faculties showed humanity, and I came out with their help as well as with that of a few women Police personnel… FIR has been registered, I trust the law… The incident occurred for about half an hour… There was mob lynching there, I escaped somehow is a big deal for me.”

Zubair Justifies Assault

Quoting the ANI video, alleged fact-checker and fake news spreader Mohammad Zubair wrote, “The woman ‘Ruchi Tiwari’ is not a journalist. She runs a propaganda YouTube channel. Here are a few old/new videos of her so called ‘interviews’…”

Zubair seemingly suggested that Ruchi Tiwari should be assaulted and molested because she is a YouTuber and not a journalist.

Source: Economic Times

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

DMK-Congress Rift Widens: ‘Believing Cash Transfer Will Ensure Victory Is Superstition’, Says Congress Leader Praveen Chakravarty

DMK-Congress Rift Widens: ‘Believing Cash Transfer Will Ensure Victory Is Superstition’, Says Congress Leader Praveen Chakravarty

Just as Manickam Tagore upped the ante against the DMK, Congress leader Praveen Chakravarty has also amplified pressure on the DMK, particularly over political messaging surrounding the release of ₹5,000 to 1.3 crore women in Tamil Nadu under the Magalir Urimai Thogai scheme.

What RS Bharathi Said

On 14 February 2026, DMK Organising Secretary RS Bharathi said that following the announcement of the Kalaignar Magalir Urimai Thogai scheme yesterday, demands for a share in governance would no longer be raised.

His remarks came after a consultative meeting of the DMK Legal Wing held at the party headquarters, Anna Arivalayam, in Chennai. Following the deliberations, Bharathi told reporters that opposition parties were already facing fear of defeat. He noted that the women’s entitlement assistance was not a one-time measure but had been provided every month.

He asserted that in the wake of the latest announcement, no one in the Congress party would continue to speak about power-sharing. According to him, the scheme had further strengthened public support for the DMK, and this political reality would deter any further demands for a share in governance.

Bharathi also reiterated that there would be no coalition government in Tamil Nadu, emphasizing that Chief Minister MK Stalin had already made the party’s position clear. While questions from Congress leaders such as Mallikarjun Kharge, Rahul Gandhi, and Selvaperunthagai could be responded to, he added that it was not possible to address every query raised by others.

Praveen Chakravarty Response

In a post on his X handle, Chakravarty stated that the Magalir Urimai Thogai cash assistance scheme alone would not guarantee electoral victory, calling such assumptions misplaced. He argued that believing entitlement transfers alone ensure success is “a superstition,” noting that in the past three years, similar women-focused financial assistance schemes were announced ahead of elections in nine major states. Of those, ruling parties won only four while losing five. His remarks were widely seen as a rebuttal to DMK leader RS Bharathi, who had suggested that after ₹5,000 was credited to women beneficiaries, alliance partners would no longer raise power-sharing demands. By citing comparative electoral data, Chakravarty signaled that welfare announcements cannot substitute alliance strength.

He wrote, “The Magalir Urimai Thogai is an excellent welfare scheme. Its implementation is commendable. However, believing that it alone will guarantee electoral victory is a superstition. In the past three years, among nine major state governments that announced similar schemes ahead of elections, only four won, while five were defeated.”

Despite repeated assertions by Chief Minister Stalin and senior DMK ministers that there would be no power-sharing arrangement, Congress leaders such as Tagore and Chakravarty, have continued to publicly insist on share in governance, greater seat allocation, and institutional recognition within the alliance

With formal seat-sharing talks yet to begin, the exchange of criticisms and counter-statements has triggered fresh speculation over alliance cohesion, even as both parties officially maintain that the DMK-Congress alliance remains intact.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

DMK-Congress Rift Widens: “If Attacked, We’ll Hit Back”, Says Congress Leader Manickam Tagore

manickam tagore dmk congress

The Congress party has stepped up its demand for a share in governance within the DMK-led alliance in Tamil Nadu, with senior leaders Manickam Tagore and Praveen Chakravarty escalating their public assertions on power-sharing, seat allocation, and alliance respect.

Amid continuing friction, a resolution was passed at a Congress Working Committee meeting chaired by Manickam Tagore, formally reiterating the party’s demand for participation in government. The resolution stressed the need to provide Congress a share in governance, allocate a larger number of Assembly seats, and ensure 30% representation in local body institutions.

This renewed push comes despite Chief Minister MK Stalin having earlier rejected the idea of power-sharing, maintaining that there would be no division of executive authority within the alliance. However, Congress leaders have continued pressing the issue in recent weeks.

Addressing the meeting, Manickam Tagore underscored that the party’s demand was rooted in dignity and alliance parity.

“All we ask for is respect and love. The DMK ministers’ talk hurts. Rahul Gandhi calls the Tamil Nadu Chief Minister his brother. Similarly, we expect respect from them. But the ministers are saying that if the Congress can come if it wants, if not let it go. They are talking aggressively about the alliance. All this hurts.”

He further stated that Congress had stood by the alliance despite political costs.

“We are with you and have been carrying the old burden for the mistakes you have made. For us, all we ask for is respect.”

Tagore also criticized the lack of disciplinary action over remarks made by a DMK district secretary.

“The DMK district secretary’s speech is saddening. It has been 20 days since we demanded action against him. Even now, no action has been taken. That is why other district secretaries are also speaking. I am not one to sit idly by and watch this. If we are attacked, we will attack back.”

Reiterating the grievance, he said: “As far as we are concerned, some people are making mistakes. What I mean is, the speech made by Thalapathi while being a district secretary is something that causes regret… it has been about 20 days. No action has been taken, and he hasn’t even expressed regret.”

He warned that Congress would respond politically if provoked.

“If we are not given respect, we will hit back; we will respond in the same language. So, if you give respect to Congress workers, we will give respect – that’s all.”

Tagore also downplayed the importance of electoral posts compared to party loyalty. He said, “If we are not given respect, we will hit back; we will respond in the same language. So, if you give respect to Congress workers, we will give respect, that’s all. Otherwise, some people are posting things saying, “You won MP seat using us (DMK), didn’t you?” I am not going to contest again as MP; I am not going to contest as MP from Virudhunagar. Why? For me, my party is important. As far as I’m concerned, MP, MLA posts, all that is nothing.”

He added, “For Congress, self-respect is what matters. Did I come to Virudhunagar to become an MP on my own? I was sent by my leadership. Rahul Gandhi sent me to become MP from Virudhunagar, I came here for that. For me, Congress party is my life, these MP, MLA posts are nothing else. I might say something worse so I am not saying it. So Congress party is my life; till I die, I will die as a Congressman, that is very clear. Our struggle is only for the respect of Congress workers. We have not asked for anything else; we have not asked for commissions. They said “commission”, we didn’t ask for commissions. We didn’t ask for road contracts; we didn’t ask for anything. How many years has it been? I think 12 years… maybe 13… around 12 years since I became an MP. Let at least one person say that I took commission. Let someone say I demanded commission for a road contract, or for sand work, or for constructing something, we never had such habits. We come in the path of Kamarajar, in the path of Kakkan, in the path of Chellapandian. As far as we are concerned, we have lived honestly. If there is food, we will eat; if not, fine, we will still continue in the party. We never went behind biryani, never attacked neighbours, never tried to build organizations to capture others’ houses, we never had such practices.”

He further said, “A Congressman is one who does not covet another man’s property – first understand that. As far as we are concerned, we stand only for dignity and self-respect. If people like Thalapathi speak like this about Congress workers and no action is taken, it causes deep regret. I even had that video – someone saying, “Is there even a man in the booth?” He then played DMK MLA Thalapathy’s video here he says…. If he spoke at that level and still no action is taken, Tamil Nadu Congress Committee president brother Selvaperunthagai demanded action, but it’s been 20 days and still nothing has happened.”

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsApp, Telegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.