“Better to shed a river of blood than to birth more than one child” -Chinese Communist Party One-Child Policy
William Shakespeare, in Macbeth, said, “Unnatural deeds do breed unnatural troubles.” The phrase is apt to describe China’s one-child policy. For thirty five years many couples had to live with a sequence of real Phantasmagoria – the frightening images of being forced to abort their child.
To promote its one-child policy, the communist government wrote operas and subverted folk arts to promote this unnatural population control program. Since the party de-facto controls everything, people were made to believe that everything is alright.
When the one-child policy was introduced in 1982, it was called an effort to make China great. The communists used every means necessary to promote one-child policy. The campaign was so fierce that they indoctrinated an entire generation that took part in what can be termed as a ‘policy holocaust’.
Families were made to feel embarrassed for having a second child and many women had to endure forced abortion. Those who had a second child had their lives ripped apart, literally. The communist party punished them by targeting their homes and taking their possessions.
The communist government turned the joy of becoming a parent into a traumatic experience. With the advent of the sonogram, sex determination became a standard practice.
China’s one-child policy punishes families for having ‘out-of-plan’ children, resulting in sex-selective abortion and tens of millions of ‘missing girls’ as well as forced abortion and sterilization campaigns – Chris Smith
In the 1980s when the one-child policy became law, the Chinese population was predominantly rural and it was not an easy task for such laws to be enforced. This put a lot of strain on those who had to implement this sadistic law. However, insubordination on the part of officials was not tolerated and any defiance from families who protested against forced sterilization was crushed. Many women were forcibly taken from there homes so doctors could perform abortion and to keep people in line there was ample State security to enforce the law.
Hundreds of thousands of women had forced abortion in China and in many cases, labor was induced and the babies killed. This must-have caused serious physical and mental trauma along with long terms psychological effects like depression, anxiety, and many became insane due to shock. The fetus/fully developed babies were wrapped in a plastic bag with medical waste printed on it.
This horror was documented by a prominent Beijing-based artist called Peng Wang. When authorities discovered this, they evicted him from a studio in the capital. Wang made artworks of “fetuses aborted and babies abandoned” under the country’s controversial family-planning controls.
The hardest termination of the fetuses was when they were aborted at eight to nine months which is practically the end of the gestation period. By twenty-four weeks a baby’s organs are fully formed and it would be unimaginable when a fetus which is technically a baby is terminated at thirty-four to thirty-eight months.
Since there is practically no room for dissent in China, many of these forced abortions and sterilizations were carried out reluctantly by officials. Abortions and sterilizations were carried out at an industrial scale and the doctors and midwives worked in an assembly line of death. Each Village had family planning workers and they were punished or rewarded based on how many children were born in their village.
Nothing was allowed to come between the writ of the party which is infallible. The loyalty towards the Communist party was absolute and it could not permit any humanity or tolerate conscience that led these people to perform such ignoble deeds. Since individualism was considered as a progressive and liberal slogan, it was unfathomable for anyone to voice protest and if they did it was crushed.
Slogans were written on walls that read, “Don’t get pregnant without permission or permit” and people were told to report on anyone who had a second child. Those who reported were given a reward.
It is estimated, these forced abortions and sterilizations resulted in preventing 330 million births. If half of these fetuses were female, imagine how it has already affected the sex ratio in China.
According to an American journalist and author, Howard W French, a professor at the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism, “The one-child policy was based on some faulty science and had, as an ambition, reining in Chinese population growth, so as to enhance the per capita wealth of the country.”
The Cultural Revolution and the Great Leap Forward
It must be noted during the rule of Mao Zedong, from 1949 to 1976, nearly 70 million Chinese died. The Great Leap Forward, from 1958 to 1962, itself resulted in tens of millions of deaths, with estimates ranging between 18 million and 45 million deaths. Also, the same number of births were lost or postponed, making the Great Chinese Famine one of the darkest periods in China.
Frank Dikotter in his book Mao’s Great Famine: The History of China’s Most Devastating Catastrophe, 1958–62, writes in detail how Mao and the senior politburo knew of the ground situation and despite millions not having access to food, the Communist party increased the food procurement quota from the countryside to pay for international imports.
Mao, said, “When there is not enough to eat people starve to death. It is better to let half of the people die so that the other half can eat their fill.” The one-child policy was also conceived with such thoughts to enhance the per capita wealth of the nation.
The Great Leap Forward was the largest mass murder in all of world history, however, the number of forced abortions that took place in China due to the one-child policy dwarfs the death caused by Chairman Mao.
China’s gender imbalance
According to an article published in Scientific American, there is serious gender imbalance among newborns as “the most serious and prolonged” in the world, a direct ramification of the country’s strict one-child policy. In China, 118 boys are born for every 100 girls, against a global average of 103 to 107.
Although fetal sex determination is prohibited in China under the law, many couples still send blood samples overseas to determine the sex of the fetus. Researchers who study sex ratios have determined that uneven sex ratios in the population could lead to increased violence and social instability.
Son preference in China through sex determination and sex-selective abortion, and neglect and abandonment of female children, has led to higher female mortality.
When the one-child policy was introduced, most Chinese in the 1980s lived in a rural area without access to sonography that could determine the sex of the fetus. That is why in many cases when a girl child was born, it was abandoned and not much imagination is required to know the fate of these hapless girl children.
Another aspect of the one-child policy was the trafficking of abandoned babies. Many were sold to orphanages who would put them up for adoption once the Chinese government allowed international adoption. These traffickers did not even have to steal babes because they would pick most of them from the market places or roads.
Such was the desire to have a boy, women who had given birth and had not even nursed the newborn would give it away or had to give it away due to pressure from family. The guilt is carried by many women in China even to this day.
Right now in China, there are 34 million more men than women and many and these men are referred to as China’s “leftover men”. Often they are subject to such comments, such as guang gun, “bare branches” in Chinese – or the “biological dead ends of their family tree”.
The one-child policy was enforced so strictly, people had to comply as they stood helpless and the trauma they had to endure. Many in China find solace that they did for the sake of the country but deep down in their heart, a part died.
For thirty-five years the one-child policy literally ripped children away from the womb of the mothers. China faces a demographic challenge as the number of old people will increase exponentially. As China tries to wipe its slate clean of its one-child policy with propaganda, the pain and agony the communist party caused to millions of its people will slowly fade away.
It is estimated by 2050, about one-third of the population in China will be over the age of 65, and the number of “working-age people is forecast to fall precipitously.”
It has been five years since the one-child policy was scrapped, but one must remember that the damage it has caused to millions of people in China can never be measured.
Already the Chinese state has started to erase its involvement in enforcing the one-child policy from the public square. Just as the massacre of Tiananmen square has been erased from the history books of China and is now a distant memory for many Chinese, the dark memories of forced abortions and sterilizations are well on its way to meet the same fate.
It is in human nature to simply try and forget unwanted memories, either consciously or unconsciously to cope with pain and loss.
However, the one-child policy of the Communist state of China did shed a river of blood and along with the blood, there was a flood of tears and a lifetime of sorrow.
The article was originally published in Aseema and has been republished here with permission.
Maneka Gandhi and her shenanigans
Maneka Gandhi, a BJP MP and former Union minister has allegedly threatened a common man of slapping sexual harassment cases against him.
In the audios that are going viral in Social Media, she can be heard threatening a businessman with harassment cases who attacked a dog that bit his child. She threatens to put him behind bars and goes on to abuse him with filthy words.
Independent journalist Deepika Narayan Bharadwaj has released these audios in her Twitter page.
Ramalingam had reportedly hit a stray dog with a cricket bat after the dog had bit his daughter. In the clip, Maneka Gandhi can allegedly be heard threatening Ramalingam to implicate him in a sexual harassment case if he attacks stray dogs or animals again.
According to the police, “Ramalingam has hit a stray dog. This was opposed by his neighbour, Nitin and his friend Malati. This episode led to full blown arguments between residents of Crescent Road and Malati. She filed complaint against Ramalingam and Ramalingam too filed case against her. We have registered both complaints,” a police officer said.
Deputy Commissioner of Police (Central Sub-division) M.N. Anuchet too confirmed that the Highgrounds police had filed a Non-Cognizable Report (NCR) against Ramalingam as well as animal activist Malati and Nitin on January 2 itself. Menaka Gandhi starts the conversation by calling the businessman a ‘goonda’ and says that she has received several complaints about his behaviour.
She tells Ramalingam that he is harassing Malati Shah and Nitin and that he must stop harassing them. She then threatens him that she would arrange for a sexual harassment complaint to be filed against him. According to the clip, Ramalingam then apologised and tried to acquaint her with the facts of the case.
However, Maneka Gandhi does not listen and tells him that Ramalingam has been beating dogs with a cricket bat, to which he replies that he used the bat for self-protection and nothing happened to the dog. He tells her that the dog bit his daughter and chased his son, when Maneka Gandhi calls him a liar.
When Ramalingam says that he is not lying and that he has proof of the dog biting his daughter, the animal-rights activist calls him a ‘liar’, a ‘scoundrel’ and a ‘drunk’. The former Women and Child Development Minister again threatens to implicate the businessman in a sexual harassment case.
Many Social Media influencers started voicing against this egoistic behaviour of Maneka Gandhi. Journalist Swati Goel Sharma tweeted, “This is so scary. A powerful woman politician is levelling all sorts of serious charges on a common man without giving him any chance to explain his side, even threatening to book him under woman molestation case. What if the man is speaking the truth?”
Madhu Purnima Kishwar, women’s rights activist tweeted, “I know it for fact that Maneka Gandhi has hired real goons by way of vigilante activists They routinely inflict fake cases, blackmail people & extort money with full backing of Maneka Her animal shelter-total sham She took huge amounts of land grants in name of animal protection”
Manindra Agarwal, IIT Professor tweeted, “She called me twice when I was Deputy Director and showed similar disregard to civilized behaviour. First time, I told her to give whatever she is saying in writing and then I will take action against her. She backed off then. Second time, I told her to cut the call as I have no interest in talking to her. She threatened that she will ensure I do not become Director. I said be my guest. I am told she went to MHRD to complaint. The person should file a police complaint against her”
This is not the first time that the BJP MP had given threat through direct or indirect means. Following are some of the incidents
Threatening an NGO
As per the audio released by the Independent Journalist Maneka Gandhi heard talking to an NGO person. While talking to the NGO person, she says that two dogs are still not yet returned by him. She starts the conversation by asking the gentleman, “Do you want to go to court? Do you want me to have you arrested?” He replies, “both dogs are doing fine but stitches are still opening”. While the man in the other side heard talking politely, Maneka Gandhi gets angry and starts calling him as Bloody Swine and abuses him with a filthy word in Hindi. According to Deepika Narayan Bharadwaj, molestation cases have been put against two men from this man’s NGO Organization.
Ousting Temple Elephants
On July 2020, with the backing of PETA (People for Ethical Treatment of Animals), Lakshmi, the temple elephant of Sri Manakula Vinayagar temple in Puducherry was ousted from the temple. The forest department had reportedly decided to keep the temple elephant Lakshmi at Kamarajar Agricultural Science Center in Kurumbapet for 15 days. Knowing this, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Hindu Munnani functionaries went on to protest against this decision to move the temple elephant Lakshmi out of the temple. In spite of the protests, the temple elephant was moved out of the temple. This move had hurt the religious sentiments of thousands of Manakula Vinayagar Temple devotees who seek blessings from Lakshmi every time they visit the temple. Meanwhile, PETA India started its propaganda to permanently move the temple elephant Lakshmi out.
With the continuous voices from Indu Makkal Katchi, devotees and animal activists on Social Media, the information reached Tamil Nadu Congress spokesperson Americai Narayanan, who had to seek the help of Puducherry CM, Narayanasamy and he passed an order to bring Lakshmi back to the temple. Supposedly, the BJP failed to keep the morale and trust of Hindu residents of Puducherry. Politically, the move by Puducherry CM to bring back Lakshmi gained scores for the state Congress.
However, animal activist, Muralidharan Shivalingam who had fought to bring Lakshmi back to the temple alleged that Maneka Gandhi was behind the ousting the elephant Lakshmi while talking to a Tamil Youtube Channel. Shockingly, similar attempts were made to oust the Elephant from the Kanchi Kamakoti Sankara Mutt. However, all these incidents did not find a place in the mainstream media.
PS Ganesh, Puducherry BJP functionary alleged that there is a conspiracy to oust all the temple elephants from South India.
Indu Makkal Katchi took twitter to criticize the actions of Maneka Gandhi, “They are the same gang who banned Jallikattu, got our local bulls and cows into performing animal category. They are the ones who go after Temple elephants, on the grounds of cruelty, but when questioned they say lack of paper work for the elephants”