Home Blog Page 142

Trump Claims Tariffs Brought In ‘Trillions’ After Appeals Court Rebuke

trump tariffs king india us russian oil

US President Donald Trump claimed his tariffs brought in “trillions of dollars” to the US economy, after a federal appeals court ruled that he overstepped his presidential authority by imposing them without congressional approval. Trump took to Truth Social to defend his trade agenda.

In a post, he declared, “Prices are WAY DOWN in the USA, with virtually no inflation. With the exception of ridiculous, corrupt politician-approved ‘Windmills,’ which are killing every State and Country that uses them, Energy prices are falling, big time. Gasoline is at many year lows. All of this despite magnificent Tariffs, which are bringing in Trillions of Dollars from Countries that took total advantage of us, for decades, and are making America STRONG and RESPECTED AGAIN!!!”

Trump’s remarks come after a significant legal blow to his administration’s trade policies. On Friday, the US Court of Appeals ruled that Trump had overstepped his presidential authority by unilaterally imposing so-called “reciprocal tariffs” during his time in office.

The court emphasised that the power to levy tariffs lies “exclusively” with Congress as part of its constitutional authority over taxation and trade. The court specifically addressed Trump’s use of the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), stating that while it grants the President certain emergency powers, it does not provide the authority to impose tariffs or taxes.

The ruling, however, will not take immediate effect and has been stayed until October 14 to allow the administration to seek an appeal. In response to the decision, Trump indicated he would take the matter to the US Supreme Court, arguing the ruling undermines presidential powers necessary to protect national economic interests. Notably, tariffs on steel and aluminium, enacted under a separate legal statute, will remain in effect.

-IANS

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Madras High Court Bars DMK Govt’s HR&CE From Constructing Commercial Complex Near Tiruvannamalai Temple Gopuram

The Madras High Court has ruled that no construction activity will be permitted near the Arunachalesvara Temple gopuram in Tiruvannamalai. The court also directed the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments (HR&CE) Department to submit a report detailing alternative sites for development.

This direction comes in response to several petitions challenging a 2023 order by the Tamil Nadu government, which had approved the construction of a ₹6 crore worth commercial complex directly in front of the temple’s Rajagopuram. Petitioners argued that such a project would obstruct religious festivals and impede the free movement of devotees.

During the most recent hearing on Thursday, the HR&CE Department informed the court that it has no plans to proceed with the commercial complex at the original location. Instead, it requested additional time to explore other options for providing amenities to devotees.

The court granted the department two weeks to file its report on potential alternatives. It also advised officials to consider whether any government-owned land located farther away from the Annamalaiyar Temple could serve as a suitable site for the complex.

In a firm stance, the bench made it clear that no construction whether on temple property or state-owned land will be allowed near the temple.

The judges further suggested that this is an opportune moment to consider establishing temple management institutions similar to Tirupati Devasthanams to oversee the maintenance of large temples in Tamil Nadu and enhance facilities for pilgrims.

The matter has been adjourned to 7 September for further proceedings.

(With Inputs From IE Tamil)

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

SC Seeks Centre’s Reply On Plea To Recognise Ram Setu As National Heritage Site

The Supreme Court on 29 August issued notice on a plea filed by BJP leader Subramanian Swamy seeking a direction to the Union government, to decide, in an expeditious manner, his representation for declaring ‘Ram Setu’ a monument of national importance.

Issuing notice, a bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta sought responses from the Union Ministry of Culture, the Director of the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI), and the Tamil Nadu Regional Director of the ASI in the matter.

Earlier, Swamy had filed a plea before the apex court seeking a direction to the Union government to engage the Geological Survey of India as well as the Archaeological Survey of India to conduct a detailed survey of the site and to ensure its protection, recognising it as a site of religious and historical significance.

In January 2023, the Supreme Court had disposed of Swamy’s application, allowing him liberty to submit additional material. However, according to the latest writ petition, no decision or action has yet been communicated by the Union government. Following a fresh representation to the Union Minister of Culture on May 13, Swamy has now filed this Public Interest Litigation (PIL), urging the apex court to direct the Centre to take a time-bound decision and comply with the previous orders to safeguard the site. Senior advocate Vibha Datta Makhija, assisted by advocate Satya Sabharwal, represented Swamy before the apex court.

Ram Setu, which is also known as Adam’s Bridge, is a chain of limestone shoals between Pamban Island or Rameswaram Island, off the south-eastern coast of Tamil Nadu, and Mannar Island, off the north-western coast of Sri Lanka. According to Indian mythology, the bridge was believed to have been constructed by Lord Rama with the help of his allies to cross over to Sri Lanka. The UPA government, in 2007, had proposed the Sethusamudram project, under which an 83-km-long deep-water channel was to be made by extensive dredging and removal of the limestone shoals, to link Mannar with the Palk Strait. After interim directions were issued by the Supreme Court on Swamy’s petition, the government resorted to another plan to link Mannar with the Palk Strait.

-IANS

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

India On Track To Become World’s Second-Largest Economy In PPP By 2038: EY Report

If India keeps economic engines running at their current pace, by 2038, the country is expected to overtake the United States to become the world’s second-largest economy in purchasing power parity (PPP) terms second only to China.

According to a report in India Narrative, citing an EY report, that would be more than a change in rankings. It would mark the arrival of a new economic heavyweight with the power to shape global markets, influence the rules of trade, and set the tone for the 21st century’s growth narrative. India may become the world’s second-largest economy in PPP terms by 2038, with a projected GDP of $34.2 trillion based on the IMF’s projected average growth rates for 2028 – 2030, according to an EY report.

India is emerging as one of the most dynamic among the world’s five largest economies, with strong economic fundamentals including high savings and investment rates, favorable demographics, and a sustainable fiscal position, states the August 2025 issue of EY Economy Watch. Among the largest economies, India stands out with a median age of 28.8 years in 2025, the second-highest savings rate, and a government debt-to-GDP ratio projected to decline from 81.3% in 2024 to 75.8% by 2030 unlike peers where debt levels are rising.

As per the IMF, India’s economy could reach $20.7 trillion (PPP) by 2030, the report points out. Compared to the US, China, Germany, and Japan, India is uniquely placed. While China leads in overall size with a projected $42.2 trillion economy (PPP) by 2030, its ageing population and rising debt are challenges. The US remains strong but faces high debt levels exceeding 120% of GDP and slower growth rates. Germany and Japan, though advanced, are constrained by high median ages and heavy reliance on global trade. In contrast, India combines youthful demographics, rising domestic demand, and a sustainable fiscal outlook, giving it the most favorable long-term growth trajectory, the EY report points out.

In economics, PPP stands for Purchasing Power Parity. It’s a way to compare the economic output and living standards of different countries by adjusting for differences in price levels. Despite global uncertainties such as tariff pressures and slowing trade, India’s resilience stems from its reliance on domestic demand and increasing capabilities in modern technologies, the EY report explains.

Commenting on India’s position, DK Srivastava, Chief Policy Advisor, EY India, said, “India’s comparative strengths, its young and skilled workforce, robust saving and investment rates, and relatively sustainable debt profile will help sustain high growth even in a volatile global environment. By building resilience and advancing capabilities in critical technologies, India is well-placed to move closer to its Viksit Bharat aspirations by 2047.”

India’s trajectory is reinforced not just by demographics but also by structural reforms and resilient fundamentals. High saving and investment rates are fueling capital formation, while fiscal consolidation is improving sustainability. Reforms such as GST, IBC, financial inclusion through UPI, and production-linked incentives are strengthening competitiveness across industries. At the same time, public investment in infrastructure and adoption of emerging technologies like AI, semiconductors, renewable energy are setting the stage for long-term resilience, the report further states. India is also projected to become the third-largest economy in market exchange rate terms by 2028, overtaking Germany.

While US tariffs may affect nearly 0.9 per cent of India’s GDP, their impact on GDP growth can be contained to just 0.1 percentage point with appropriate countermeasures like export diversification, stronger domestic demand, and advancing trade partnerships, the report added.

-IANS

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Over 2 Lakh Voter Claims From Electors, Just 117 from Parties: ECI

eci electoral roll

Despite repeated allegations of “vote theft” and “voter list manipulation” from the opposition parties, the Election Commission of India (ECI) on 29 August revealed that only 117 claims and objections were received from political parties during the period from 1-29 August.

This contrasts sharply with the nearly 2,12,000 claims and objections submitted directly by electors. The ECI’s latest bulletin, dated 29 August, shows that out of 117 claims and objections submitted by political parties, a significant majority (108) came from the Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) (Liberation) alone. The Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) filed nine objections, while all six recognised national parties, including the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP), Communist Party of India (Marxist), Indian National Congress (INC), and the National People’s Party, filed a total of zero claims and objections.

This data was released amid ongoing criticism from opposition parties like the Congress and RJD, who have alleged that the SIR process is a “conspiracy” to steal votes and disenfranchise eligible citizens. The SIR began on 24 June with the draft electoral roll published on 1 August. The period for filing claims and objections is set to end on 1 September, with just three days left for submissions.

The ECI stated that generic complaints, without the prescribed forms, are not counted as valid claims or objections. The bulletin also provided additional data, noting that the Election Registration Officer (ERO) received zero claims from any person other than electors of a specific Assembly Constituency, as per Section 2(g) of the Representation of the People Act, 1950.

Furthermore, a total of 2,11,650 claims and objections were received directly from individual electors to address the inclusion of eligible voters and the exclusion of ineligible ones. The ECI also recorded 11,36,565 forms from new electors who have attained 18 years of age or above. The ECI emphasised that no name can be deleted from the draft list without a speaking order from the ERO/AERO after a proper inquiry. Aggrieved persons can submit their claims in Form 6 along with a copy of their Aadhaar card before the deadline.

-IANS

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

US Economist Richard Wolff Warns Of Global Shift As BRICS Surpasses G7 In GDP

Leading US economist Richard Wolff has warned that a significant global economic shift is underway, noting that BRICS nations have surpassed the G7 in global output, with BRICS at 35 per cent and G7 at 28 per cent of the world GDP.

Wolff asserted that India’s refusal to stop buying Russian oil despite US pressure showed how the balance of power is shifting. “India is now, according to the United Nations, the largest country on earth. The United States telling India what to do is like a mouse hitting its fist on an elephant,” he said.

Wolff noted in a podcast that China has reduced its US Treasury holdings as US debt reaches $36 trillion, which could pose serious challenges to the US dollar. If that trend continues, the US may face higher borrowing costs or domestic spending cuts, which could further weaken its global position, he added. The economist criticised US tariffs as an ineffective strategy that could bring India and other BRICS members closer together. “What you’re doing is developing the BRICS to be an ever larger, more integrated and successful economic alternative to the West,” he explained. Wolff slammed the Trump administration’s claim that tariffs can revive US manufacturing.

He said, “No company that is currently manufacturing something in Brazil or China or India is going to decide to spend a fortune to move production back to the United States.” According to him, US tariffs run the risk of excluding American exporters from overseas markets without the creation of new domestic jobs. The Trump administration imposed an additional 25 per cent tariffs on India starting Wednesday, bringing the total levies to 50 per cent. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has ruled out any compromise that threatens the interests of India’s farmers and small businesses. India has termed the US tariffs “unjustified and unfair”. Meanwhile, PM Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping will hold a bilateral meeting on the sidelines of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Summit in Tianjin on Sunday. This is PM Modi’s first visit to China in the last seven years.

-IANS

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Why Tamil Nadu May Become The Battleground Of The US–India Tariff War

The beginning of the 50% tariff regime by the US a few days ago has caught the world by surprise. Why would the US take this extreme step against a far less powerful country, and too a country which has had increasingly improved relations with it in the past few decades? A country would impose tariffs on an adversary; not on a weaker power that is in no position to attack it militarily or economically.

There are two schools of thought that have tried to understand this seemingly non-intuitive US behavior. The first holds that the US considers India as a country of no significance. It views Russia and China as its rivals. By punishing India, a country of no consequence in its view, it is sending a message to its lesser rival Russia: stop selling your oil or we will punish those who buy it. To its greater rival China, it is making a conciliatory move: we are punishing your major irritant, India, and so you had better behave yourself so we can move to a bipolar G2 world with us two as world hegemons. So much for the popular theory that the US was using India as a counter to China.

The entirely opposite view is that the US is really frightened about an India that is rising rapidly. A country of 1.4 billion people, half of whom are under 30 has sheer people power with favourable demography. India is at a takeoff stage in its military, atomic energy and space programs. It has shown this prowess by downing a US satellite in 2019. A country that can do this is well capable of using this capability in a regular war—in principle, India can attack the continental USA. Joining the dots, it seems more than possible that India inflicted some big damage on installations within Pakistan during Operation Sindoor— damage of a type that made the US, and maybe China as well, realize that they might have underestimated a sleeping giant.

Trump has never been unaware of the potential of India to assume a rank of primary importance in the international high table—if its growth is allowed unchecked for, say 15 years. If India is allowed to grow to $7 or 8 trillion by 2030, it will reach a status when the US and China will have to factor it in, in any geopolitical calculation. Already India is punching above its weight. It continues to buy Russian oil, strengthen its supply chains, begin to exert an influence on the shipping lanes in the Indian Ocean and make its defence equipment. It is no longer the place where computer coolies do low grade back end jobs for Silicon Valley.

India is a valued member of both BRICS and QUAD. The latter was created ostensibly to act as a check on China’s Pacific ambitions. The former sees India, China and Russia trying to de-dollarise the world economy. Imagine the deftness of Indian foreign policy to be able to do this. India now sees itself as a necessary intermediary between nations that have been at odds: Japan and China; Japan and Russia; Russia and Ukraine; Israel and Iran. One doesn’t need to be the policeman of the world. In the new order it is more strategic to be the ambassador of the world. This is Chanakya Neeti.  A lesser power can punch above its weight by artfully placing itself as an intermediary between rivals seeking areas of congruence rather than dissonance between them.

No country except India can even try to do this because only India has the priceless ownership of Sanātana Dharma. Only sanatanis seek to resolve rather than exacerbate tensions. This is the real meaning of Vishwaguru. India has realised that it can use its soft power — but only if it has hard power. In my view this is what makes Trump and the US Deep State really anxious about India. Very slowly they are beginning to understand that this primary pagan non-Abrahamic religion is very different from the monotheistic world, which is the only world they have ever known. What is scary to them, because clever Americans are really clever, is that it is this missing X-factor, Hinduism, that gives us the feelings of confidence to punch above our strength today. Will Sanātana Dharma really become eternal? This is the question.

In this context, where economic punishment is hardly likely to deter us, the only tactic that the US can resort to is to encourage our half enemy that is within India—specifically I mean the Congress party and the regional hereditary parties of which the DMK is the most notable. Let us expect increased financial aid to these entities from the US Deep State in the coming months. The US would like nothing better than a weak, entitled and stupid person from the Congress as a token PM of India surrounded by strong regional hereditary satrapies.

Tamil Nadu can well become a big battleground in this conflict between two world systems. It is strong economically, strategically located geopolitically (Straits of Malacca), Kalpakkam is located there, it is close to Sriharikota, it is the home of many defence installations, and above all—and this is the clinching factor—it is an authentic home of Sanātana Dharma with its grand temples, religious orders within the Hindu fold, the cradle of Carnatic music and Bharata Natyam. The people of Tamil Nadu are deeply religious despite 400 years of crackpot Dravidian indoctrination beginning with De Nobili and ending with Udayanidhi. Sterlite Copper was only a pilot plant. The entire state will become a complete factory with large-scale manufacturing.

The biggest reason for the latest American fire and brimstone on India is that it doesn’t want us to succeed and become strategically autonomous. A combination of strategic autonomy with economic self-sufficiency, can catapult Bharat’s civilizational and value based ethos to make it the norm for most of the world barring the Amerisphere. This will be the real Visisht Bharat. Our model will show many countries that are weaker than us that they do not need to abandon their cultural and spiritual values, and struggle to align with the now dying “rules based order” paradigm to appear “modern” in the eyes of the West.

Chanakya tells us that when faced with enemies of different strengths, an aspiring power attacks the most powerful one first. India is doing exactly this by going after the US, ignoring the tariffs, continuing to buy Russian oil, parleying with countries as disparate as Japan, Poland, Israel, UAE and Egypt.

It will be ironic if Tamil Nadu becomes the Dharmakshetra for the first real battle between the global clash of civilizations.

Gautam Desiraju is in the Indian Institute of Science and UPES Dehradun.

Subscribe to our TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram channels and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

A Look Back At Narendra Modi’s Japan Visits As Gujarat Chief Minister

Prime Minister Narendra Modi, currently on a two-day visit to Japan, will attend the 15th India-Japan Annual Summit in Tokyo on 29 August, where the two Prime Ministers will review the entire spectrum of bilateral ties and discuss ways to take forward the next phase of the Special Strategic and Global Partnership.

PM Modi made several visits to the island nation, as Gujarat Chief Minister, during which he discovered the huge potential of bullet trains on the nation’s economy, held interactive sessions with ‘Gujarat samaj’ and also earned the title of ‘business-friendly leader’, owing to his persistent thrust on growth and development.

Narendra Modi set foot in Japan as Gujarat Chief Minister for the first time in April 2007, leading a 40-member delegation of bureaucrats and industry leaders. In the six-day tour of Tokyo, Osaka, Hiroshima, and Kobe, CM Modi courted corporate giants Mitsubishi, Mitsui, Sumitomo, Marubeni, Suzuki, Toshiba, Nippon Steel, Nissan Steel, Unido, and Tsuneshi Shipbuilding and secured MoUs between JETRO and Gujarat’s Industries Department. During this trip, Narendra Modi met then Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and discussed the Delhi-Mumbai Industrial Corridor (DMIC).

CM Modi presented Abe with a CD on Gujarat’s Buddhist heritage sites and a handwoven tribal shawl, and also invited him to Gujarat. Abe, in turn, assured Modi of Japan’s full support for Gujarat’s stretch of the DMIC. One of the most iconic moments of this visit was the then CM Modi stepping into the cockpit of the Japanese Bullet Train. That seed of an idea in 2007 is blossoming years later into the Mumbai-Ahmedabad Bullet Train project, the flagship of Indo-Japanese cooperation. During the trip, Narendra Modi also walked through the Peace Memorial Park and Museum in Hiroshima, pausing to absorb the lessons of history. In Kobe, he attended a cultural programme at The India Club, which has been a bridge for the Indian diaspora since 1904.

This 2007 visit significantly expanded business and cultural relations between Gujarat and Japan. In July 2012, he went to Japan, this time not just as Gujarat Chief Minister but as a leader whose reputation had begun to transcend state boundaries. His five-day visit from July 22-27 was at the formal invitation of the Government of Japan a rare honour, accompanied by a Cabinet-rank reception, usually reserved only for heads of government. Narendra Modi, heading a high-level delegation of top officials and industrialists, would go on to attend 44 programmes across Tokyo, Hamamatsu, Nagoya, Osaka, and Kobe an unprecedented schedule for a state chief. He met leading ministers and then Deputy Prime Minister Katsuya Okada, and also held discussions with Governors like Hideaki Omura of Aichi Prefecture and Toshizo Ido of Hyogo Prefecture. At JETRO’s investment seminars in Tokyo, Hamamatsu, and Nagoya, then CM Modi spoke of Gujarat’s transformation into a power-surplus, investor-friendly state.

He highlighted infrastructure, ports, logistics, and industrial corridors as Gujarat’s big bets for the future. Business meetings included a significant session with Osamu Suzuki, Chairman of Suzuki Motors, where Modi pitched Gujarat as Asia’s next automotive hub. He later toured Suzuki facilities, interacted with Indian engineers working in Japan, and shared lunch with Suzuki himself. Amidst the diplomacy, there was also space for culture. Narendra Modi addressed the Gujarat Samaj of Japan in Tokyo and met with members of the India Centre Foundation.

At the India Club in Kobe, a historic institution of the diaspora, he engaged with the Indian and Gujarati community, strengthening emotional bonds. He also enjoyed a boat ride at Kobe port, symbolic of friendship across waters. The Japanese establishment was impressed, and so was its media. The country’s largest business daily, Nikkei, ran a 742-word feature describing Narendra Modi as the “business-friendly leader” and even called him “a strong contender for India’s Prime Ministership in 2014”. Ambassador (then) Akitaka Saiki, one of Japan’s most accomplished diplomats, called Modi “different from other CMs” because of his “speedy governance”. At a time when Japanese investors were wary of instability elsewhere in India, Modi’s growth pitch stood out. A phrase became increasingly popular: “Modi Means Business”.

-IANS

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Delhi’s Low Murder Rate Cited By White House To Justify Federal Deployment In Chicago

The White House is comparing the low murder rate in New Delhi to the high rate in Chicago as it builds its case for federal intervention in that city.

US President Donald Trump’s Spokesperson Karoline Leavitt said that the Illinois city’s murder rate was 15 times higher than the Indian capital’s in 2024. Chicago’s homicide rate was 25.5 per 100,000 residents according to city statistics, while Delhi’s was 1.48. Earlier, to justify President Trump deploying the National Guard troops and federal law enforcement personnel in Washington the White House posted a chart showing the murder rates in 11 capitals around the world in 2024. That ranked Delhi’s murder rate at the ninth spot, with only London and Madrid ahead of it, while Washington topped the chart with 27.64 homicides. Islamabad ranked the fourth worst with a rate of 9.2 per 100,000 residents.

Having deployed the National Guard in Washington, Chicago is his next target. “Chicago is a mess” and Chicagoans were “screaming” for help, President Trump said last week. “So, I think Chicago will be our next federal deployment, and then we’ll help with New York”, he said. The National Guard can be broadly compared to the Territorial Army, except it is organised on the basis of states and both the federal and state governments share control over them. They can be deployed in combat overseas as it happened in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The US Constitution or laws don’t have provisions for President’s Rule or federal intervention in states, and his plans have met stiff opposition from Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker and Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, and federal troops’ deployment will likely face court challenges. “Action will be met with a response”, Pritzker warned. “We will not stand idly by if he decides to send the National Guard to intimidate Chicagoans,” he added.

Since Washington is a federal territory, President Trump had the powers for deployment of the National Guard, despite the opposition of Mayor Muriel Bowser and the Democrat-dominated City Council. Bowser has since grudgingly acknowledged that crime rate has come down since the surge ordered by President Trump. “We know that when carjackings go down, when use of guns goes down, when homicide or robbery go down, neighbourhoods feel safer and are safer, so this surge has been important to us”, she said on 27 August. There has been no homicide since the National Guard was deployed on 11 August in the city that saw 100 till that date from 1 January.

President Trump has said that he wants the death penalty, which is on the federal law books, to be invoked in Washington and juveniles to be prosecuted as adults. He is also pushing all the states and cities that have introduced cashless bail to rescind them by threatening to withhold federal funds. President Trump has cast his battle along party lines saying that of the 25 cities with highest crime rates, all but a couple are run by Democrats. Voters’ worry over crime was one of the factors that helped President Trump win the election. Even though Democrats say crimes are falling, they are still high, and President Trump is hoping to capitalise on this. One of the dilemmas for the Democrats is that most crime victims in cities are African Americans and Latinos — nearly 95 per cent of murder victims in Chicago, for example, are from those communities — and President Trump hopes to appeal to them.

In hard numbers, Chicago with a population of 2.75 million recorded 573 homicides, and 2,189 sex crimes last year according to the city. Washington, which has a population of only 702,250, saw 187 homicides and 143 sex abuse cases last year, according to the city’s federal prosecutor’s office. In contrast, Delhi with a population of 34 million had 504 murders and 2,076 crimes against women last year, according to police.

-IANS

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

PM Modi Receives Heartfelt Welcome From Indian Diaspora In Japan

Prime Minister Narendra Modi received a heartfelt and emotional welcome from the Indian diaspora upon his arrival in Tokyo on 29 August for the 15th India-Japan Annual Summit.

The visit sparked pride, excitement, and deep emotion among Indians living in Japan, many of whom described meeting the PM as a dream come true. The cultural reception and face-to-face interactions left many deeply moved, with several individuals expressing their pride, admiration, and overwhelming emotions.

Members of the Indian community in Japan gathered in large numbers to greet the Prime Minister, showcasing traditional performances and patriotic enthusiasm. For many, the moment was more than ceremonial; it was deeply personal. One member of the Indian diaspora expressed, “He is the best PM. Ten years ago, when Modiji wasn’t there, Pakistan used to seem dangerous. Now, even America feels like a joke in comparison.”

Another member added, “I can’t even express it. It was truly a proud moment.” Sharing his joy, another attendee said, “Meeting PM Modi ji here feels like a dream come true for every Indian.” Many were visibly emotional, including one member who said, “I can’t express how emotional this moment is for all of us. We have seen him on TV, watched his interviews, but seeing him face-to-face is a completely different aura, a different persona.” Japanese performers, who showcased traditional music and dance during PM Modi’s welcome ceremony, also shared their heartfelt impressions after interacting with the Indian leader.

One performer remarked, “It was such an impressive experience. I never expected that Modi ji would take a picture with us, so I was deeply moved.” The warm reception highlighted not just the diplomatic significance of the visit, but the deep-rooted cultural and emotional ties shared between the people of India and Japan.

The Prime Minister arrived in Japan on Friday for a two-day visit from 29 to 30 August, during which he will participate in summit-level talks with Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, aimed at strengthening the India-Japan Special Strategic and Global Partnership.

-IANS

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.