Home Blog Page 116

“Hindi Demon”: Sudha Kongara’s Anti-Hindi, Pro-DMK Propaganda Film Parasakthi Distributed By Stalin Family Attacks Indira Gandhi And Congress, Creates Rift In DMK-Congress Alliance

Sudha Kongara finds herself in soup after her anti-Hindi, pro-DMK propaganda film ‘Parasakthi’ is getting bashed left, right and centre.

The film, a supposed historical drama on the 1965 anti-Hindi agitations, has been slammed as blatant DMK propaganda that shamelessly targets the Congress party and former Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, all while being bankrolled by Dawn Pictures (with deep DMK ecosystem ties) and distributed by Red Giant Movies, run by CM MK Stalin’s grandson Inban Udhayanidhi.

Apart from the pathetic filmmaking, Parasakthi is now a new subject of controversy with netizens pointing to a particularly venomous scene where Sivakarthikeyan stands beside an ugly-looking black saree-clad effigy labeled “Hindi Arakki” (Hindi Demon), widely interpreted as a direct, derogatory jab at Indira Gandhi. Despite the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) mandating 25 modifications—including changing “Hindi Arakki” to just “Arakki” (Demon) wherever it appeared screenshots and clips from the film clearly show the unaltered effigy scene with Sivakarthikeyan posing next to it.

There’s a scene in which Congress leader Bhaktavatsalam is shown saying, “These fellows don’t know Hindi, their brains are filled with mud.”

The scene is framed as a critique of North Indian linguistic and cultural arrogance, which many viewers have linked to historical Congress-era attitudes toward southern states.

Most notably, the film features strong political lines that directly invoke Congress by name.

In the same sequence, it is reported that one dialogue states that for the “betrayal committed against Tamils,” the Congress would never be able to rule Tamil Nadu.

With alliance negotiations and electoral calculations underway, the portrayal of Congress as a historical betrayer of Tamil interests has become politically consequential. This has led to Congress leaders bashing the film and taking hits at the DMK.

With Congress giving feelers to TVK through its support for Vijay’s alleged final film ‘Jana Nayagan’, the rift between Congress and DMK has widened.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

TN Single-Screen Theatres Who Signed Up For Vijay’s Jana Nayagan Allege Denial Of Parasakthi Screening, Accuse Distributor Of Punishing Them

A single-screen theatre in Pudukottai has alleged that it was denied screening rights for the Tamil film Parasakthi despite repeated requests, triggering accusations of selective distribution and retaliatory practices within the Tamil film exhibition sector.

RKP Cinemas, Pudukottai, said in a statement on social media that it had received numerous calls and messages from patrons enquiring about the opening of bookings and whether the theatre would screen Parasakthi. The theatre clarified that it had initially entered into an agreement to screen Jana Nayagan. However, after the release of Jana Nayagan was postponed, the theatre approached the distributor to screen Parasakthi instead.

According to RKP Cinemas, the distributor of Parasakthi was unwilling to provide the film print and continued to delay a decision, resulting in the theatre being unable to screen the film. The management stated that this was the sole reason for the non-availability of Parasakthi at the venue and apologised to patrons for the inconvenience caused.

The allegation quickly escalated on social media, with several users and cinema-related accounts accusing Red Giant Movies of retaliating against single-screen theatres that had previously signed agreements for Jana Nayagan. Posts claimed that theatres which had committed to screening Jana Nayagan were now being denied access to Parasakthi.

Some exhibitors argued that adding more single-screen and large theatres to Parasakthi’s release would have been mutually beneficial, particularly at a time when many single-screen theatres are reportedly operating at a loss.

Additionally, theatre representatives and exhibitors gathered at Shanthi Theatre on 10 January 2026, alleging unfair distribution practices. According to statements circulated from the venue, even theatres that had already signed agreements for Jana Nayagan were allegedly being denied Parasakthi prints. Speakers at the gathering claimed that such actions were pushing theatres deeper into financial distress.

The allegations were framed by protesters as politically motivated, with accusations that the ruling DMK party in Tamil Nadu was indirectly influencing film distribution through affiliated entities. These claims were circulated widely on social media platforms, with calls for greater public awareness of what protesters described as systemic misuse of power in the film distribution ecosystem.

At the time of publishing, Red Giant Movies and the distributors of Parasakthi had not issued any official response addressing the allegations. No confirmation has been provided regarding the criteria used for theatre allocation or the reasons for withholding prints from specific exhibitors.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Hindu Professor Alleges Decades Of Religious Discrimination At Aligarh Muslim University, Says Harassment Led To Personal Tragedy

A senior professor at Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) has alleged that she was subjected to religious discrimination and prolonged mental harassment for nearly three decades, stating that the sustained pressure caused severe personal and professional distress, including a miscarriage.

Professor Rachana Kaushal of the Political Science Department has accused senior officials at the university of targeting her because of her religious identity. She has submitted a formal complaint to the Vice Chancellor, along with audio recordings and documentary evidence, and has stated that she intends to file a First Information Report (FIR) in the matter.

According to the complaint, the alleged harassment began soon after Professor Kaushal joined AMU as a lecturer in 1998. She stated that discrimination and mental pressure started early in her career and continued over the years, adding that she had not anticipated facing such treatment at a central university on religious grounds.

Professor Kaushal further alleged that the pressure intensified during critical phases of her personal life. She stated that in 2004, while she was pregnant with twins, she was subjected to excessive workload and mental stress, which she claims resulted in a miscarriage. She also stated that her husband, D.K. Pandey, a senior professor at JN Medical College, AMU, passed away in 2012.

In her complaint, Professor Kaushal has also accused the current Dean of the Faculty of Social Sciences, Mohammad Nafis Ahmad Ansari, of making repeated remarks referencing her religion. She alleged that the Dean told her that she was Hindu and should go to Banaras Hindu University and further accused him of making statements suggesting that Hindu teachers deliberately avoid teaching Muslim students and of questioning their conduct at academic conferences.

She stated that these remarks were personally insulting and undermined the secular character of the institution, adding that such comments contributed to a hostile work environment. Professor Kaushal has submitted audio recordings of the alleged remarks to Vice Chancellor Naima Khatun as part of her evidence.

Despite the alleged harassment, Professor Kaushal stated that she continued to teach at the university for years in the hope that the situation would improve. She said she now believes that legal action is necessary and has indicated that she intends to approach the police and make the matter public.

AMU authorities have confirmed receipt of the complaint and stated that an internal inquiry has been initiated. At the time of publishing, no official response had been issued by the university administration or by the accused faculty member regarding the allegations.

Source: News18

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“You Can Never Come To Power In This Lifetime”: Sudha Kongara’s Anti-Hindi, Pro-DMK Propaganda Film Parasakthi Distributed By Stalin Family Directly Attacks Congress

The release of the Tamil film Parasakthi, produced by Dawn Pictures, distributed by Red Giant Movies and starring Sivakarthikeyan, has triggered political discussion after several of its dialogues were widely interpreted as a direct critique of the Congress party and its historical role in language policy.

Viewers and political observers have pointed out that the film is totally about anti-Hindi imposition during the 1960s and the subsequent protests in 1965.

One scene that has drawn attention depicts the lead character – Chezhiyan confronting Indira Gandhi on being forced to face an unfamiliar language for a day, prompting a reflection on how linguistic imposition feels when power is exercised without empathy.

In this scene, Sivakarthikeyan says, “Just for one day, when you experienced in your life what it is to face a language you do not understand, how did you feel when you were treated the way you usually treat others?”

The dialogue conveys the idea that experiencing an alien language, even briefly, reveals the humiliation and exclusion routinely faced by others.

In the same scene, one character is seen to refer to the lead as “Madrasi”. He says, “Hey Madrasi, get down first.”

Then the character who plays former TN CM Bhaktavatsalam says, “These fellows don’t know Hindi, their brains are filled with mud.”

The scene is framed as a critique of North Indian linguistic and cultural arrogance, which many viewers have linked to historical Congress-era attitudes toward southern states.

Most notably, the film features strong political lines that directly invoke Congress by name.

In the same sequence, it is reported that one dialogue states that for the “betrayal committed against Tamils,” the Congress would never be able to rule Tamil Nadu.

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by Chanakyaa (@chanakyaa_tv)

The dialogues have led to speculation in political circles about whether the film’s messaging signals a broader shift in political alignment. Observers have questioned whether the DMK ecosystem, through a film released by its closely associated production and distribution network, is deliberately distancing itself from its alliance with the Congress. Some analysts argue that the explicit nature of the criticism goes beyond historical commentary and appears calibrated to resonate with contemporary anti-Congress sentiment in Tamil Nadu.

The timing of the film’s release has also added to the debate. With alliance negotiations and electoral calculations underway, the portrayal of Congress as a historical betrayer of Tamil interests has been interpreted by critics as politically consequential rather than incidental.

However, the film’s dialogues have already gained traction on social media, where clips are being circulated with claims that Parasakthi openly revives the anti-Congress, anti-Hindi-imposition rhetoric that historically shaped Dravidian politics in Tamil Nadu.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Parasakthi Disaster: Sudha Kongara’s Anti-Hindi, Pro-DMK Propaganda Film Is Just Regurgitated Dravidianist Vomit That Is Rightfully Getting Trashed By Audience

Parasakthi Disaster: A Complete Washout For Anti-Hindi DMK Propaganda Film On Day 3 Itself Despite Paid Reviews And PR

Dravidianist filmmaker Sudha Kongara’s bloated, agenda-soaked period drama promptly crashes like a big piece of donkey’s dump—splattering everywhere with the stench of failure that no one can ignore.

Let’s be honest—Parasakthi was never meant to be a film. It was engineered propaganda, assembled with all the subtlety of a party pamphlet.

From day one, the film was engineered as naked pro-DMK propaganda: timed for Pongal 2026 (conveniently ahead of assembly polls), produced by Dawn Pictures (tied to DMK ecosystem) and distributed by Red Giant Movies which is run by DMK scion Udhayanidhi Stalin’s son Inban Udhayanidhi.

And the subject? A carefully curated, sanctified retelling of the 1965 anti-Hindi agitations, scrubbed clean of complexity and rewritten as pure Dravidianist propaganda film which ends up showing Congress in bad light instead of BJP.

Though the film is based on “real-life events”, the fictional part is as cliche and boring it can get.

Sivakarthikeyan plays Chezhiyan “Che” (a blatant, heavy-handed homage to Che Guevara, because why not slap revolutionary iconography on a Tamil protagonist for extra virtue points?). He starts as an ordinary, peaceful guy (railway loco pilot or similar, minding his own business, even learning Hindi).

His younger brother Chinnadurai (Atharvaa, homage to Annadurai – because nothing says “subtle” like naming characters after political legends) is the fiery rebel diving headfirst into protests and social causes. Sivakarthikeyan initially dislikes the activism, wants no part of it. Enter the ruthless antagonist Thirunaadan (Ravi Mohan), a Delhi-sent intelligence officer/police brute who unleashes hell, leading to the brother’s tragic death in the agitation.

Cue the predictable transformation: the reluctant brother avenges the loss, stands up for the cause, becomes the hero of the movement, and delivers the triumphant message. It’s the classic reluctant-hero arc: peaceful man → family tragedy → righteous awakening → revenge/protest climax. We’ve seen this template in a dozen films – brother dies fighting injustice, sibling takes up the mantle, fights the system. Add the period setting, anti-imposition theme, forced romance (with Sreeleela as the token love interest/newsreader), and endless monologues, and you’ve got a paint-by-numbers propaganda piece masquerading as historical drama. No fresh twists, no depth – just recycled clichés dressed in 1960s costumes.

The love track is forced and cringy, zero chemistry, dragging like a bad college romance in a protest film. Period visuals look okay initially, but then it’s just repetitive slow scenes, lecture-heavy dialogues, and no grip.

Post-interval, the film is on a complete freefall. The plot stretches like stale chewing gum, and every supposed “emotional beat” is telegraphed from miles away. Atharvaa’s death? So predictable even a child could call it ten minutes earlier. The protest sequences are hollow – just loud speeches, raised fists, and thunderous background score trying desperately to manufacture emotion where none exists.

The only saving grace for the film is the acting of Sivakarthikeyan and Ravi Mohan.

If you are an agmark Oopi craving to simp for anti-Hindi rhetoric, save your money and listen to old Karunanidhi speeches on YouTube. At least that won’t cost you a ticket.

Sudha Kongara uses the same playbook as her earlier works: twist facts for ideological convenience, preach endlessly, and hope the message overrides the mess.

The film whitewashes the role of EV Ramasamy Naicker (hailed as ‘Periyar’ by his followers) who opposed the 1965 anti-Hindi agitations and insulted the protesting students as “hooligans”. Congress figures are converted into cartoon villains, while DMK icons are framed as flawless saviors.

This is Sudha Kongara’s trademark fraud. She has done it before. In Soorarai Pottru, she airbrushed Captain Gopinath’s Brahmin roots and magically reinvented him as a EVR-admiring crusader, who fights a north-Indian airline owner and the government system controlled by the powers at be in Delhi. Her separatist streak is visible in Parasakthi too, as Sudha Kongara plays to the DMK’s gallery of projecting ‘Tamil Nadu Vs Delhi’ politics.

This isn’t cinema—it’s regurgitated Dravidianist vomit prioritizing politics over originality or entertainment.

Theatres are already reporting empty screens, dull shows, and dead silence where applause was expected. Social media is flooded with viewers trashing the film, mocking its boredom, and openly abusing it – and frankly, it has earned every bit of that backlash.

While Telugu and Kannada industries are producing films like Kantara, Pushpa, and RRR—stories that travel globally on the strength of content – Dravidianwood remains stuck in in a cesspool crying Hindi imposition, oppression, suppression, depression.

Avoid this unoriginal flop. Sudha Kongara’s career low—lazy, clichéd, agenda-driver, cynical, preachy, boring mess.

The film’s hook line is “Thee Paravattum”.

But it is only Dravidianist stench that is spreading through this “P** padon”.

Vallavaraayan is a political writer. 

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“You Should’ve Gone To Cremation Ground When Karunanidhi Died, Why Did You Go To Marina?”, BJP Leader Annamalai Hits Back At DMK Min Regupathy Who Likened Lighting Thiruparankundram Deepam To Funeral In Cremation Ground

“If Customs Shouldn't Be Changed, Why Did You Go To Marina After Fmr CM Karunanidhi Died?”, BJP Leader Annamalai Hits Back At DMK Min Regupathy Who Likened Lighting Thiruparankundram Deepam To Funeral In Cremation Ground

BJP leader K Annamalai launched a sharp attack on DMK ministers over their remarks following the Thirupparankundram verdict, questioning what he described as selective application of tradition and custom.

Referring to the long-standing nature of the Thirupparankundram dispute, Annamalai said the issue had existed since 1920 and had remained unresolved for over a century. He recalled that Poornachandran had sacrificed his life for the cause and said that people were paying their respects to him, describing him as a good person.

Taking aim at DMK minister Raghupathi, Annamalai criticised his remarks on funeral customs. He said the minister had stated that bodies must be cremated only in cremation grounds and that customs could not be altered. Annamalai questioned this position by pointing to the burial of former Chief Minister M Karunanidhi at Marina Beach.

Speaking at the event Annamalai said, “Look at what the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam ministers are saying today. They are talking about the verdict in Thirupparankundram. All of us know this is an issue that has been there since 1920, a problem that has existed for 105 years. Poornachandran even sacrificed his life for this; today we are paying our respects to him, he was a good man. After the verdict, Regupathy says, “The body must be burnt only in the cremation ground; how can you change that custom?” Brother Regupathy, when Kalaignar Karunanidhi passed away, you should have gone only to the cremation ground; why did you go to Marina? Why did you change the custom for him, when you say the custom cannot be changed? That is what I am asking. After Kalaignar Karunanidhi passed away, I have respect for Karunanidhi Ayya. Even if there are differences at the level of ideology, we will give our Chief Minister the respect due to a Chief Minister. But if you insult the people to this extent in your speech today, how long do you think it will take before we start speaking back in the same tone? The same question will be asked by the people: after Kalaignar Karunanidhi’s death, you should have gone to a cremation ground only. Why insist that he must be buried on Marina beach? Why did you go to court for that? The very same questions will be asked by the people, by Hindu people, by the people of Tamil Nadu. Today Regupathy is a minister. If there is anyone in Tamil Nadu who is unfit to hold the post of a minister, it is Regupathy himself.”

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Madras High Court Questions Flag Hoisting By Dargah On Thirupparankundram Temple Land, Calls It “Rank Criminal Trespass”

Madras High Court Questions Flag Hoisting By Dargah On Thirupparankundram Temple Land, Calls It “Rank Criminal Trespass”

The Madras High Court on Friday, 9 January 2026, sharply questioned the Executive Officer of the Arulmigu Subramania Swamy Temple at Thirupparankundram over the hoisting of a dargah flag on land declared as temple property, observing that the act amounted to criminal trespass.

Justice GR Swaminathan, while hearing a contempt petition relating to non-compliance of an earlier court order, sought a clear explanation from temple authorities on how the dargah management was allowed to hoist a flag at the Deepathoon area for the Sandhanakoodu festival.

At the outset, the Court asked the Executive Officer whether the place where the flag was hoisted belonged to the dargah or the temple. In response, the EO admitted that the land belonged to the temple. When questioned on whether any complaint had been lodged against the dargah authorities, the EO stated that no complaint had been filed and cited illness and absence from duty as reasons.

The Court expressed strong displeasure over this explanation and directed the EO to immediately lodge a complaint and instructed the Police Commissioner to take action upon receipt of the complaint.

Referring to the recent order of the Division Bench, the Court reiterated that the Deepathoon area, located on the lower peak of the Thirupparankundram hill, had been categorically declared as temple land. The Court noted that despite this declaration, the dargah authorities had tied the Pallivasal flag on a tree located in the said area in connection with the Sandhanakoodu festival.

Recording the submission of the Executive Officer, the Court observed: “The Hon’ble Division Bench was pleased to declare that the Deepathoon area that is on the lower peak of the hill belongs to the temple. But in connection with the Sandhanakoodu festival, the Dargha authorities tied the flag of the Pallivasal in the tree in the Deepathoon area. Thiru. Yagna Narayanan, the Executive Officer states that the permission of the temple authorities was not obtained before doing so. He concedes that what was committed by the Dargha officials was a rank criminal trespass.”

The EO further undertook before the Court that a complaint for criminal trespass would be lodged immediately before the jurisdictional police and that all necessary formalities would be completed to initiate criminal prosecution against the dargah officials. This statement was made in the presence of counsel Chandrasekar.

Justice Swaminathan also questioned the apparent inconsistency in the administration’s conduct. The Court recalled that authorities had earlier claimed that even the entry of five persons into the area would lead to public disorder and statewide unrest, which was cited as justification for imposing prohibitory orders under Section 144 of the CrPC. However, no action was taken when the dargah flag was hoisted on temple land.

The Court remarked that the right to property applied equally to all and questioned why criminal trespass was permitted in this instance. It further observed that the authorities appeared to have acted in a one-sided and biased manner.

The judge was hearing a contempt petition arising from non-compliance with his order dated December 1, which directed temple authorities to light the Karthigai Deepam at the Deepathoon atop the Thirupparankundram hills. Earlier, senior police and revenue officials had been summoned after citing law and order concerns to justify non-implementation of the court’s direction.

The Court also noted that despite being granted four weeks to file affidavits explaining non-compliance, the officials had failed to do so and showed no remorse for their actions. Justice Swaminathan identified three distinct acts of contempt – disobedience of the original order, issuance of Section 144 to frustrate the court’s directive, and resistance to implementation even after the prohibitory order was quashed.

Taking on record the officers’ submissions that they acted on their own and not under political dictation, the Court said it would frame contempt charges against the officials and adjourned the matter to 2 February 2026.

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by Tamil Janam (@tamiljanam)

Source: LiveLaw

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Censor Certificate Reveals Sudha Kongara’s Anti-Hindi Pro-DMK Propaganda Film Calls Telugu People As “Golti”, Andhra & Telangana Boycott Movie

A controversy has erupted around director Sudha Kongara’s upcoming film after details from the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) certificate revealed that the Tamil version of the movie contained derogatory references to Telugu people.

According to the censor certificate, the word “Golti”, widely regarded as a racial slur against Telugu-speaking communities — was used twice in the film and was subsequently muted following objections. The reference appears under Cut No. 17 of the CBFC modification list, which records that the words “Notraam” and “Golti” were muted at multiple time codes in the film.

The revelation has triggered strong backlash from Telugu audiences and social media users, who have accused the film’s makers of promoting linguistic hatred while simultaneously positioning the movie as a progressive, anti-imposition narrative. Critics pointed out the contradiction of condemning alleged language imposition while using offensive terminology against another linguistic community.

The outrage has particularly focused on director Sudha Kongara, a Telugu-speaking filmmaker, and actor Sivakarthikeyan, who has enjoyed consistent support and acceptance in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana. Critics argued that the use of such language amounted to a betrayal of Telugu audiences who have backed the actor’s films in the Telugu states.

Social media campaigns demanding an unconditional apology from the film’s team gained traction, with several users calling for a boycott of the movie in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana. Many alleged that the film was not merely a creative work, but part of a larger ideological project aligned with DMK’s political narrative, selectively targeting Hindi while normalising slurs against other Indian linguistic groups.

The CBFC document further lists multiple politically sensitive edits, including the muting of phrases critical of Hindi, removal of visuals depicting effigy burning labelled “Hindi Arakki,” and insertion of disclaimers in sequences involving national institutions. Critics have cited these edits as evidence that the film originally contained overt political messaging aimed at reinforcing anti-Hindi sentiment while shielding itself through post-certification modifications.

As calls for accountability grow louder, Telugu groups have stated that an unconditional public apology is the minimum acceptable response, warning that silence from the filmmakers will only deepen resentment and strengthen boycott calls across the Telugu-speaking states.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

BJP Leader SG Suryah & Youth Wing Members Allegedly Attacked By DMK-Backed Goons Instigated By Dravidianist YouTuber Senthilvel After Debate In Chennai

BJP Tamil Nadu Youth Wing President SG Suryah has strongly condemned an alleged assault on him and BJP youth wing members at a private television channel office in Chennai, accusing DMK cadres of resorting to violence after being unable to counter arguments during a televised debate.

In a post on X, Suryah stated that the incident took place at a private television studio in Egmore, immediately after the conclusion of a debate. He alleged that the attack occurred in the presence of DMK Member of Parliament Thanga Tamilselvan and police personnel, which he described as a serious breakdown of law and order.

According to Suryah, he and more than 20 BJP youth wing office-bearers who attempted to protect him were subjected to what he termed a “murderous assault” by DMK-linked individuals. He further alleged that the attackers openly informed the police of their intention to disconnect the power supply for ten minutes before carrying out the attack. He claimed that the power was subsequently cut, following which the assault took place as threatened.

Suryah accused the police of acting in complete connivance with the attackers and alleged that the incident amounted to an attack on freedom of expression. He stated that the DMK’s alleged practice of engaging in politics through intimidation and violence posed a threat to democratic norms.

He also demanded accountability from the DMK government for the injuries sustained by BJP youth wing members during the incident, stating that the government must answer for the bloodshed caused in the attack.

Dravidianist YouTuber SenthilVel Instigates Crowd

This was reportedly instigated by Dravidianist YouTuber Senthil Vel. He shared a video complaining about what happened inside the studio and allegedly instigated the cadres present and said that he align with them were waiting to teach the BJP people a lesson.

In the video, he says, “Today in Chennai, a recording was held for News18 Tamil Nadu’s “Makkal Sabhai” as a special Pongal programme. I was informed that in this programme, Mr. Thangatamilchelvan, Mr. Nanjil Sampath, our beloved young leader Itumbavanam Karthi from Naam Tamilar Katchi, and from the Bharatiya Janata Party, SG Suryah and others would be participating. As planned, the programme began very well. But what was the problem, you may ask. In every such “people’s forum” or “Makkal Sabhai” type programme these days, some BJP members and, as a sort of replica of the BJP, the TVK goons from elsewhere, about ten of them, come and stand there, shout that they have the courage to take on Dravidian movement comrades, scream, and in abusive words behave in a rowdy manner, making a habit of preventing Dravidian views from reaching the people.”

He adds, “Because of various work commitments, when Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam comrades and Dravidian movement comrades come to this hall, they end up having to stand outside without space inside. In today’s Pongal special programme you can see that hundreds of DMK comrades have been pushed to stand outside for many hours without space inside. Chairs and benches have been placed outside, and they are quietly watching the show from there. When a situation arose where there were practically no DMK comrades inside, and I started to speak, even before I could begin my first word of greeting, even before I could say “vanakkam”, the BJP’s goon group, that anarchic group, started behaving in a very indecent manner. As one group they began to mock me and abuse me. With great patience I kept trying again and again to speak to the content, to the point.”

He further said, Comrades who regularly see me on television know this: I am someone who speaks with great dignity; I never speak in the singular “nee” to anyone, I do not speak disrespectfully, I never speak without evidence, I never speak without data. When I began to place my arguments with data, as someone who respects members of other parties as well, and when I began to put forward my argument with data, some goons belonging to the BJP started shouting from inside using very filthy words. They thought, “Today he has come alone, there is no DMK person inside.” When I tried to speak in spite of that, they kept continuously disrupting my speech. I then said, “I no longer wish to be in this assembly; when I am being abused in the singular, I do not want to remain in this hall that lacks dignity,” and with great patience and mental anguish I walked out. When we join a debate, we must definitely be allowed to speak; that is the norm. I expressed my regret to that television channel. I have conveyed my regret to News18 Tamil Nadu and its team. I do not have any grievance against them because there was simply no space there. But the point is this: such people must be taught a lesson.”

He further said, What do they think? Earlier, when comrade Thangai Mathivathani came, they did the same slogans, spoke abusively. Every time Dravidian movement comrades and DMK comrades come to speak, they have adopted a strategy of shouting, yelling, and using that to derail and spoil the show.”

Then he started instigating the people around him. He said, “​Today, in order to teach them a lesson, I came outside. When I came out and saw, among the crores of Kalaignar’s kin, there were hundreds of “Thalaivar’s” kin standing outside shouting “Vazhga! Vazhga! Vazhga!” “Let Periyar’s fame rise! Let Kalaignar’s fame rise! Let Kalaignar’s fame rise! Long live beloved Thalapathy! Long live beloved Thalapathy! Long live beloved Thalapathy!”

He further said, “O commanders of the war brigade of the Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu. The senior DMK functionaries of this area unit, the devoted brothers of Anna Sekar Babu are here in their hundreds standing outside; I did not know that. I did not know that hundreds of them were standing outside. In the midst of these BJP men who behaved without dignity, what is the use of placing an intellectual argument? There is a verse in the scriptures: “Do not cast pearls before something that does not value them.” Likewise, I realised that whatever argument I place in this BJP crowd inside this hall, they are not going to let me speak, and I walked out. When I came outside, there were hundreds of brothers standing here. Now we are waiting. Who are we waiting for? Inside, as soon as ten of them got together and shouted, they showed their so‑called bravery; that bravery they must show outside now. We are not going to indulge in any rowdy behaviour or arrogance. We are going to stand properly in an orderly manner, raise our slogans and show our strength. So that in future, whenever a DMK comrade or a Dravidian movement thinker speaks, even if there is not a single DMK member inside the hall, they must quietly listen to what he says and should not disrupt him.”

He continued instigating, To teach them that lesson, we are waiting outside. All these people you see here are not those who came after the problem erupted. They are comrades who have been waiting here for many hours, from just a few minutes after the programme began. Because there was no space inside, they stayed outside. We are saying: let the BJP people come out after the programme ends. We will raise our slogans in front of them in a peaceful manner and then disperse. We do not intend to behave in a way that causes inconvenience to ordinary people. We are asking them to come out. When they come, we will raise our slogans and then we will leave. From here on, whether it is BJP men or KVK people, when such programmes are held, if you bring ten people, wrap a towel on your shoulder and in that arrogance shout us down, then for the consequences that follow, we will not be responsible.”

Source: Tamil Janam

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“Their Agenda Is Genocide, They Want To Wipe Out Muslims, Tribals, Minorities”: Radical Woke Ultra-Leftist Prakash Raj Makes Baseless Claims About BJP-RSS, Abuses Judiciary

Radical woke ultra leftist actor Prakash Raj triggered sharp political reactions after making a series of incendiary remarks at an event organised by the Association for Protection of Civil Rights (APCR) in Hyderabad. The event, titled “Longing for Justice”, was held on 17 December 2025.

Speaking to the audience, Prakash Raj alleged that what was unfolding in India amounted to a systematic plan aimed at genocide. He claimed that minorities were being deliberately targeted, stating, “Whatever is happening in this country is a preparation of a genocide. They want to wipe out Mussalman. They want to wipe out tribal people, minorities. That is their agenda.”

He asserted that constitutional safeguards and legal processes no longer mattered to those in power. According to him, “We may talk of rules, regulations, nothing matters to them. They don’t have a conscience.”

In an emotionally charged address, Prakash Raj also attacked India’s justice system, declaring that courts had failed citizens. He said that for decades, people believed the judiciary was independent, adding, “We were sure we will get justice in the court. We were sure that a court does not belong to a political party, does not belong to the ruling government, does not belong to a religious institution.” He then went on to say, “But sadly today I dare give this statement… Shame on you the courts of India. Because you are committing the biggest crime, killing justice.”

The actor argued that political opposition alone would not address what he described as an ideological threat. “You see it. No, you are fighting BJP. Don’t fight BJP. You have to fight the RSS,” he said, drawing comparisons with European fascist regimes. Referring to Hitler and Mussolini, he claimed they failed because they operated as political parties, while alleging that the RSS functioned differently and wielded deeper influence.

Using an analogy from the Panchatantra, Prakash Raj said the RSS was like a hidden force beneath a visible symbol. “You are fighting with the lotus. Fight with the strength which gives to that lotus which is deep down,” he said, adding that confronting judges or institutions alone would not work.

He further alleged that the RSS had no role in India’s freedom struggle, stating that there was “not even one name” associated with it and claiming that the organisation would “never hoist our Indian flag.”

Referring to a mass email he said he received from Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Constitution Day, Prakash Raj accused the Prime Minister of hypocrisy. He described the message as “a letter full of lies,” and questioned references to Dr BR Ambedkar and Mahatma Gandhi, calling the Prime Minister “a liar.”

He also referred to the recent public event where the Prime Minister and the RSS chief were present and the Ram Mandir flag was being hoisted, alleging that the Prime Minister showed greater reverence to the Bhagwa flag than to the national flag. “I’m wondering does this man really have this reverence to our national flag. No, their agenda is different. Their agenda is genocide,” he said.

Continuing his remarks, Prakash Raj claimed that the Constitution itself was under threat. “Their agenda is to bring the Manusmriti. Their agenda is to change the Constitution because they are not comfortable with that. They want you, me, Umar, everyone to be secondary citizens,” he told the audience.

Issuing a warning to the public, he said, “Be aware, be careful. Today they are coming for the Muslims. Tomorrow they will come to you.” He urged people to keep raising their voices, calling the developments a “chronology” that could be clearly traced.

Citing past murders of rationalists and activists, he referred to the killings of Gauri Lankesh, Narendra Dabholkar, Govind Pansare and M M Kalburgi, alleging that despite arrests and evidence, the accused were later granted bail and publicly celebrated. He claimed that such incidents showed a pattern of impunity.

Concluding his speech, Prakash Raj alleged that the ultimate objective was to dismantle democratic institutions. “Their agenda is very clear — to kill the democracy, kill all systems,” he said, urging people not to be afraid and to continue speaking out. “If you can lie to us 100 times, let’s speak the truth thousand times,” he said.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.