Home Blog Page 106

‘Divine Or Bovine Intervention In Verdicts Breaches Judicial Oath’, Says Ex-Supreme Court Judge Hinduphobe Rohinton Nariman

Former CJI DY Chandrachud Responds To Ayodhya Verdict Criticism By Ex Justice Rohinton Nariman hinduphobe

Former Supreme Court judge Rohinton Nariman has expressed disapproval of judges claiming that their verdicts are shaped by divine intervention. Speaking at the KM Bashir Memorial Lecture organised by the Press Club of Trivandrum on 1 September, Justice Nariman made it clear that any external influence “whether divine or bovine” on judicial decisions would amount to a breach of the oath taken by a judge.

His remarks came in response to a question from the audience regarding former Chief Justices attributing judgments to divine guidance. The query appeared to allude to ex-CJI DY Chandrachud’s statement that he had prayed to God for clarity before the Supreme Court delivered its 2019 ruling in the Ram Mandir–Babri Masjid case.

“If a judge bases a verdict on divine, bovine, or any other intervention, that judge is breaking his constitutional oath,” Justice Nariman emphasised. “Judges must abide strictly by their oath to the Constitution and the law. While they may bring their personal morality into interpretation, it cannot go further than that.”

During his lecture on ‘Fraternity in a Secular State: The Protection of Cultural Rights and Duties’, Nariman highlighted that secularism is fundamental to building fraternity, which he described as a core constitutional value. He stressed that fraternity cannot thrive in a theocratic system.

He further clarified that secularism was not an afterthought inserted into the Constitution through the 42nd Amendment but had always been embedded within its framework. “It’s incorrect to suggest that secularism arrived only with the 42nd Amendment. Its essence was already present,” he noted.

Justice Nariman also spoke about his research into different religious philosophies while working on his recent book, An Ode to Fraternity, which examines the values shared across world religions.

(With inputs from Bar & Bench)

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“Undergone Half The Sentence”: Chief Justice Of India Gavai Bench Suspends Life Sentence Of Catholic Priest Convicted For Raping Minor, Grants Bail

On 17 September 2025, the Supreme Court temporarily suspended the life sentence of Father Edwin Pigarez, a Roman Catholic priest convicted of raping a minor girl.

The bench, consisting of Chief Justice BR Gavai and Justice K Vinod Chandran, granted bail to Pigarez while his appeals against the High Court’s conviction ruling are still pending.

Chief Justice Gavai is already under criticism as he had recently mocked a Hindu petitioner who had sought the restoration of a beheaded 7-foot idol of Lord Vishnu at the Javari temple in Khajuraho, Madhya Pradesh. He had said ““Go and ask the deity itself to do something now… It’s an archaeological site and ASI needs to give permission etc. Sorry.”

In February 2024, the Kerala High Court had upheld the priest’s conviction for repeatedly raping and sexually assaulting a young girl in his parish. However, the court reduced his sentence, changing the life imprisonment to twenty years of rigorous imprisonment without the possibility of remission.

The Supreme Court referred to sections 376(2)(i) and 376(2)(n) of the Indian Penal Code, noting that while life imprisonment is an option for the offense, the minimum sentence prescribed is ten years. While suspending Pigarez’s sentence, the Court observed that he has already served almost ten years in prison. The bench highlighted that even if it were to accept the twenty-year sentence imposed by the High Court, Pigarez has already completed half of that term.

In light of this, the Supreme Court decided to suspend the sentence and ordered Pigarez’s release on bail until his appeals are resolved. The Court directed that he be released on bail in connection with Sessions Case No. 203 of 2016, under terms and conditions set by the Trial Court.

(With inputs from Live Law)

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Over 7 Years Without Recruitment: 8000 Guest Lecturers Shoulder Burden In TN Colleges

tamil nadu vice-chancellor higher education guest lecturer TN Govt Arts And Science College professor

The recruitment of Assistant Professors in government Arts and Science colleges across Tamil Nadu has remained stalled for more than seven years, creating a vacuum of nearly 4,000 sanctioned posts. The prolonged delay, caused by legal hurdles, has forced the Higher Education Department to rely heavily on guest lecturers to meet classroom requirements.

At present, close to 8,000 guest lecturers are working in 171 government Arts, Science, and Education colleges. Their numbers have steadily risen as the state has been unable to appoint permanent faculty. The recent sanctioning of 15 new government Arts and Science colleges added to the demand, prompting the appointment of more than 570 new guest lecturers, of whom over 560 have already joined duty.

The issue can be traced back to a 2010 commitment by the Higher Education Department to regularise the services of existing honorary lecturers, a promise that remains unfulfilled. Although the department has completed all formalities for fresh recruitment, including the conduct of the State Eligibility Test, the results are still pending before the courts, preventing appointments.

Pay disparity is another major concern. Guest lecturers in Tamil Nadu draw the lowest remuneration in the country, far below the standards ensured in neighbouring and northern states. While states such as Kerala, Puducherry, Punjab, Haryana, and Delhi offer salaries between ₹40,000 and ₹57,700 a month in line with University Grants Commission norms, Tamil Nadu’s lecturers continue to receive significantly less.

The prolonged uncertainty has pushed more than 500 lecturers to file about 54 cases in the Madras High Court and its Madurai Bench seeking regularisation. Though several favourable rulings have been delivered, the state has continued to file appeals, leaving the matter unresolved. Education experts caution that excessive reliance on temporary staff may eventually affect the quality of teaching and research in higher education institutions.

They stress the need for immediate recruitment to fill the sanctioned Assistant Professor posts, regularisation of qualified lecturers already in service, and long-term measures to prevent such disputes from recurring.

-IANS

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Bangladesh: Yunus-Led Interim Government Bars Sheikh Hasina And Family from Voting, Awami League Symbol Removed

Bangladesh: Yunus-Led Interim Government Bars Sheikh Hasina And Family from Voting, Awami League Symbol Removed

Bangladesh’s former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and several of her family members will be barred from voting in next year’s election as their National Identity (NID) Cards are blocked, local media reported. Election Commission (EC) Senior Secretary Akhtar Ahmed on Wednesday told the reporters that “anyone whose NID card has been locked cannot vote from abroad. Those who fled abroad due to cases or for other reasons face no obstacle in voting, but their NID must remain unlocked.”

“To vote from abroad, one must register online using their NID number. A passport will not work. So if someone’s NID is locked, how can they register? They cannot. Only those who register with their NIDs will get this opportunity,” Bangladesh’s leading newspaper, The Business Standard, quoted the EC official as saying.

When asked whether Hasina will be able to vote, he said, “She cannot vote because her NID is blocked.” In April, the National Identity Registration Wing under the EC “locked” the NID of Hasina and her nine family members following a verbal instruction from its Director General, ASM Humayn Kabir.

The family members include Sheikh Rehana Siddique, Sajeeb Wazed Joy, Saima Wazed, Shahnaz Siddique, Bushra Siddique, Tulip Rizwana Siddique, Azmira Siddique, Radwan Mujib Siddique, and Tarique Ahmed Siddique. Earlier in July, the EC removed the election symbol of Hasina’s Awami League party from its website in an attempt to end the party’s decades-long political existence in the country, according to local media reports.

On May 12, the Muhammad Yunus-led interim government issued a gazette notification banning all activities of the Awami League and its affiliate organisations. The ban was imposed under the “Anti-Terrorism Act” until the trial of the party and its leaders in Bangladesh’s International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) is completed.

Analysts reckon the latest developments as an extension of the political vendetta pursued by the interim government led by Yunus against former PM Hasina and her family members, with a larger plan of keeping the Awami League away from taking part in the national elections.

The unceremonious exit of Hasina last August was globally seen as a major setback to the democratic set-up in the country. The interim government has also received massive criticism for providing shelter to radical and extremist Islamic outfits.

-IANS

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Pennsylvania Shooting: Gunman Opens Fire In Codorus Township, Kills Three Officers Before Being Shot Dead

los angeles mass shooting america usa emory university austin target store elementary school arkansas high school pennsylvania

Three police officers lost their lives and two others were critically injured in a shooting incident in Pennsylvania’s Codorus Township, according to local media reports. State Police Commissioner Christopher Paris confirmed the deaths and said the gunman was also killed during the confrontation on Wednesday afternoon (US time).

“They were there to follow up on an investigation that began yesterday,” Paris told reporters at a press conference, describing the case as “domestic-related”. He declined to share further details about the nature of the investigation. The incident unfolded shortly after 2 p.m. local time in North Codorus Township, located about 115 miles west of Philadelphia near the Maryland border, the local media reported.

Governor Josh Shapiro stated that the officers were responding to a domestic investigation when gunfire erupted. He confirmed that the two wounded officers remain in critical but stable condition. Authorities have not released the identity of the suspect or specified which agencies the slain officers were serving at the time.

“We grieve for the loss of life of three precious souls who served this county, served this commonwealth, served this country,” Shapiro said, expressing condolences on behalf of the state. Visuals from the scene showed one of the injured officers being airlifted by helicopter. In response to the shooting, a nearby school district in Spring Grove was briefly placed under a shelter-in-place order, though officials later clarified that students were safe and unaffected, according to local media reports.

Attorney General Pamela Bondi condemned the violence, calling the attack “a scourge on our society”, and confirmed that federal agents were assisting local authorities in the investigation. Lieutenant Governor Austin Davis appealed to residents to keep the victims and their families in their prayers. Investigation is underway, and further details are awaited.

-IANS

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Days After Charlie Kirk Assassination, Trump Declares Antifa A ‘Major Terrorist Organisation’

Days After Charlie Kirk Assassination, Trump Declares Antifa A ‘Major Terrorist Organisation’

US President Donald Trump on Thursday (Indian time) officially designated Antifa as a “major terrorist organisation”, days after the killing of his close aide and right-wing political activist Charlie Kirk.

“I am pleased to inform our many USA Patriots that I am designating Antifa, a sick, dangerous, radical left disaster, as a major terrorist organisation. I will also be strongly recommending that those funding Antifa be thoroughly investigated in accordance with the highest legal standards and practices. Thank you for your attention to this matter!” Trump wrote in a post on his social media platform, Truth Social.

Trump did not elaborate on what parameters his administration would use to make the characterisation and what actions he would take to target a left-leaning movement. Antifa does not seem to have a centralised structure or any defined leadership. Last week, the US President repeatedly blamed the left for rising political violence in the country, including for the murder of conservative commentator Charlie Kirk.

“I’ll tell you something that’s going to get me in trouble, but I couldn’t care less. The radicals on the right oftentimes are radical because they don’t want to see crime. The radicals on the left are the problem, and they’re vicious and they’re horrible and they’re politically savvy,” he said in an interview with Fox News. On Tuesday, prosecutors in Utah charged Tyler Robinson, the main accused in Kirk’s killing, with aggravated murder and six other charges and announced that they will seek the death penalty.

According to the prosecutors, Robinson’s mother told investigators that “over the last year or so, Robinson had become more political and had started to lean more to the left — becoming more pro-gay and trans-rights oriented.” The document also noted that the mother stated Robinson had begun dating his roommate, a biological male transitioning to become a woman. Kirk, who was 31 years old, was delivering remarks during a campus event at Utah Valley University on September 10 when he was shot in the neck.

He was rushed to the hospital but succumbed to his injuries shortly after. Kirk was the founder of Turning Point USA (TPUSA), the country’s most prominent conservative student organisation. He launched the Arizona-based group in 2012 at the age of 18, building it into a political powerhouse with over 800 chapters across US colleges. TPUSA became a central force in mobilising young conservative voters, particularly in the 2024 election, where it played a pivotal role in boosting Trump’s re-election campaign.

-IANS

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

AIADMK Slaps Legal Notice Against Serial Fake News Peddler And DMK Stooge ‘Journo’ Niranjan Kumar

The AIADMK has issued a legal notice to former journalist Niranjan, warning of legal action if he fails to apologize for reporting that party general secretary and opposition leader Edappadi K. Palaniswami allegedly left Union Home Minister Amit Shah’s residence in Delhi with his face covered.

On 16 September 2025, Palaniswami had travelled to Delhi along with senior AIADMK leaders, stating that he wished to personally congratulate C.P. Radhakrishnan on his assumption of office as the Vice President of India. During the visit, Palaniswami met Radhakrishnan and later held consultations with Amit Shah at 8.10 PM.

Reports subsequently emerged claiming that after the meeting with Amit Shah, Palaniswami asked senior AIADMK leaders accompanying him to return to their hotel, and that he, along with his son, continued discussions with the Union Home Minister. Following the consultations, speculation circulated online that Palaniswami had left Amit Shah’s residence in a different vehicle, allegedly concealing his face.

Former Puthiya Thalaimurai journalist Niranjan broadcast this version of events live, claiming that Palaniswami departed with his face covered. The report went viral on social media, triggering sharp reactions within the AIADMK.

Niranjan had posted a video with the caption:

In response, AIADMK members sent a legal notice to Niranjan demanding an apology. The party’s IT Wing also issued a statement on social media, asserting that a legal notice had been dispatched as the first step in pursuing legal proceedings against Niranjan for spreading what it described as “defamatory news” against Palaniswami.

The AIADMK statement said the report was “completely contrary to media ethics” and accused sections of the media of acting in alignment with the DMK’s political agenda. The party further claimed that the “fourth pillar of democracy” was betraying the trust of the people of Tamil Nadu by allegedly serving as “agenda carriers” of the DMK, which, it argued, had “earned the total hatred” of the people of the state.

Instances When DMK Stooge Journo Peddled Fake News

Here are some instances where Dravidianist propagandist Niranjan Kumar, peddled narratives favourable to the DMK, reinforcing their narratives and ideology.

1. Mocking Hindu Sentiments Via Propaganda

On 18 September 2024, Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister N Chandrababu Naidu accused the former YSR Congress Party (YSRCP) government of using substandard ingredients, including animal fat, in the famous Tirupati laddu. However, YSRCP denied these allegations.

A laboratory report revealed that beef tallow, fish oil, and palm oil were used to prepare laddus, which were distributed as prasad at the renowned Sri Venkateswara temple in Tirupati. The report’s findings indicate that the ghee used to prepare the iconic Tirupati laddu prasadam during the YSRCP regime contained traces of animal fat, including beef tallow and fish oil, leading to widespread outrage and claims of disrespect toward religious sentiments.

As the entire Hindu community is outraged by reports of adulteration of Tirupati Laddu prasadam with beef tallow, pig fat and fish oil, the DMK-supporting Dravidianists in Tamil Nadu have pounced on the opportunity to mock Hindus and their worship of cows.

Dravidian journo Niranjan Kumar in an X post that seemingly justified the presence of beef fat in the holy prasadam, the Dravidianist journalist said “Let all those souls who were lynched to death attain peace“, in an apparent dig at gau rakshaks protecting cows from smugglers.

In another post he mocked at Hindus by making reference to a scene from the film ‘Ayan’ in which the antagonist offers laddu to a character played by actor Prabhu, to signify the striking of a deal. Prabhu offers the laddu back to the antagonist to confirm it is not poisoned. However, later Prabhu’s car meets with an accident because the antagonist had removed the nuts and bolts from the wheels.

You thought I kept it in the laddu? I kept it in the nut-u“, says the antagonist.

In this case, the malice was actually in the laddu and so, the screenshot and snippet of this scene was shared by many Dravidianists and DMK-Congress supporters. Niranjan too shared the same screenshot to mock Hindus.

The bigoted Dravidian propagandist shared another screenshot from the movie ‘Yaaradi Nee Mohini’ in which the character blushes as she says “Achaho Perumale”. The propagandist at Puthiya Thalaimurai in a sadistic way expressed his elation at Hindu devotees being duped and made to eat laddu laden with beef fat.

2. Peddling Distorted Facts From Delhi

This is not the first instance of bias from Dravidianist journalist Niranjan Kumar. Previously, when the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) secured a historic third consecutive term in Haryana by winning 48 seats in the 2024 assembly elections, Kumar’s coverage was similarly skewed. In the elections, the Congress party secured 37 seats, with the 90-seat assembly holding voting in a single phase on 5 October 2024, and a turnout of around 68%. The BJP had also emerged victorious in the Haryana Assembly elections of 2014 and 2019, yet Kumar’s reporting failed to provide a fair or balanced account of these outcomes.

Despite facing significant opposition and unfavorable political predictions where Congress was projected to secure around 60 seats compared to the BJP’s 20, the BJP casually turned the tables. Silent voters in Haryana demonstrated their support for the BJP, and concerns over instability under Congress, particularly regarding the influence of the Jat community and employment issues, influenced the election results.

However, the Dravidianist journalists, promoted narratives to buttress the Congress. At midday, when the BJP was projected to secure 46 seats and Congress was trailing with only 38, Niranjan Kumar claimed on live TV that BJP spokespersons were avoiding the media due to expected turn in tides. He stated, “Spokespersons were holding continuous press briefings, but for the past half hour, they have been avoiding questions. This change comes as the polling landscape shifts, with the BJP fluctuating around 50 seats. We could see that BJP leaders here are anxious about their ability to sustain the government.”

 

This caught the attention of netizens and political observers, who took to social media to call him out and mock him with amusement. This isn’t the first instance of Niranjan Kumar’s dubious journalism in support of his political masters; he consistently demonstrates his loyalty at every opportunity.

3. Peddling Narrative For Congress During Lok Sabha

During this recent Lok Sabha election season, Kumar seemingly expressed a strong desire for the victory of the Congress, but when that did not materialize, he immediately started celebrating the success of the DMK like several other Dravidianist journalists.

In a post following Narendra Modi’s swearing-in for a third term as Prime Minister of India, Kumar intentionally misled his audience with false information on his X account, claiming that Modi’s third cabinet lacked any members directly elected from Tamil Nadu. This statement raised eyebrows, especially since the DMK, as the opposition, had won all the Lok Sabha seats in the state. It appeared as though he was implying that PM Modi should consider including DMK members in the cabinet.

Niranjan Kumar wrote, “Important: Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s third cabinet did not include a single member of parliament directly elected from Tamil Nadu. L Murugan, Nirmala Sitharaman, and others have also been elected to Rajya Sabha from other states.”

4. Spreading Distorted Facts About Removal of Statues In Parliament

In two other posts, Niranjan Kumar raised concerns about the removal of statues of Mahatma Gandhi and Ambedkar in the Parliament complex. However, this claim was promptly refuted and labeled as a fake narrative with the Parliament secretariat clarifying that the statues were being relocated systematically and respectfully within the Parliament House complex. Despite this clarification from the secretariat, the so-called Delhi-based journalist chose not to acknowledge or convey their statement, instead opting to propagate the narrative of the Congress party.

This post raises the question of whether Niranjan Kumar is indeed a journalist based in Delhi or if he is from 24, Akbar Road, New Delhi.

Niranjan Kumar wrote, “The Congress party has alleged that the statues of the Father of the Nation Mahatma Gandhi and the architect of the Constitution of India, Ambedkar, are being removed and placed in a corner. Congress alleges that BJP has started insulting political leaders

5. Peddling Distorted Facts Favoring DMK Minister

Niranjan Kumar faced criticism from netizens for blindly sharing information without fact-checking, as promoted by a DMK minister. In a post on his X account, amid the ongoing uproar from I.N.D.I.Alliance partners regarding allegations of the central government “looting tax revenue” from states, he quoted DMK Minister PTR Palanivel Thiagarajan during a protest at Delhi’s Jantar Mantar. He wrote, “There was a Chief Minister in India who claimed the central government is deceiving them and spoke about federal principles. He said they are taking our state’s tax money and diverting it to other states: he is none other than the former Chief Minister of Gujarat, Narendra Modi, who is now the Prime Minister.”

However, his claims were quickly debunked. After assuming office, PM Modi increased the allocation of funds to states from 32% to 42%. He also reduced the population weightage in tax distribution from 27.5% to 15%.

Moreover, during the UPA regime from 2004 to 2014, the total funds available to states amounted to ₹30 lakh crore, while from 2014 to 2023, this figure soared to over ₹100 lakh crore.

In terms of tax sharing and assistance, Tamil Nadu received ₹1,52,921 crores under the UPA from 2004 to 2014. In contrast, this amount increased to ₹5,08,337 crores during the Modi regime from 2014 to 2023.

Additionally, Tamil Nadu has benefited from ₹10.76 lakh crores in funds, projects, and grants over the past nine years under the Modi government.

6. Peddled Fake News About Repo Rates

On 9 February 2023, the Reserve Bank of India raised the repo rate by 25 basis points to 6.50% to curb retail inflation. This move is expected to increase the cost of loans linked to external benchmarks, like the repo rate. Following the hike, DMK supporters, including journalist Niranjan Kumar of Puthiya Thalaimurai, spread misinformation, with Kumar suggesting that the dream of buying a house would remain unfulfilled. However, the rate hike is a standard response to inflationary pressures in a growing economy, a basic economic principle that Kumar either ignored or lacked knowledge of.

7. Parroted DMK Minister’s Line In Ponmudi Mud Throwing Incident, Blames BJP

Even now, Niranjan Kumar pushed a biased narrative in his recent coverage of an incident involving DMK Minister Ponmudi. On 3 December 2024, during Ponmudi’s visit to Villupuram to distribute relief materials and assess the damage caused by Cyclone Fengal, a group of individuals relief materials, staining his white shirt. The incident quickly went viral on social media, with initial reports suggesting that locals were angry at the governments inefficiency in relief work.

 

However, Niranjan Kumar shamelessly framed the incident with the headline, “Throwing mud at Minister Ponmudi… BJP woman functionary in the background.” This narrative was based on an explanation given by HRCE Minister PK Sekar Babu in an interview, and the police were still investigating the case, with no arrests reported at that time. Meanwhile, other videos began circulating on social media showing a group of agitated youths and locals—agitated by the government’s relief efforts—tearing down DMK banners associated with Ponmudi. Netizens quickly questioned whether these youths were affiliated with the BJP, mocking the narrative. Despite the growing online discussion, Kumar continued to push his one-sided portrayal of the incident.

8.Made Unverified Claims During Evacuation Mission During Russia-Ukraine War

In March 2022, during the Russia-Ukraine war, Niranjan alleged that South Indian students were discriminated in the evacuation operation from Ukraine. The journalist based his claim on an unverified source, a parent of a student who had returned from Ukraine, and did not provide any credible evidence or corroboration for his allegation.

9.Peddled Lies That Modi Govt Rejected TN Tableau For R-Day

He also misreported that the Modi government rejected Tamil Nadu’s Republic Day tableau for not featuring prominent freedom fighters, though the selection process is based on an expert committee’s recommendations.

 

He had peddled fake news that the Modi Government at the Centre had ‘rejected’ Tamil Nadu’s tableau for the Republic Day Parade for not having ‘prominent freedom fighters’ while the fact is that each year only limited number of tableaus from states are selected based on the recommendations of an expert committee appointed by the Ministry of Defence. Tamil Nadu’s tableaus were selected in 2016, 2017, 2019, 2020 and 2021, far more than many other states.

10.Peddled Fake News That BJP Candidate Uma Anandan Lost By 8 Votes

In February 2022, the alleged ‘journalist had peddled fake news against BJP candidate of Ward No. 134. Uma Anandan, saying that she had lost by securing just 8 votes while she emerged as a winner with 5635 votes.

11.Falsely Linked Hemant Soren Arrest To Cancelled Flights

He falsely linked the arrest of Hemant Soren and alleged horse-trading of Jharkhand MLAs to cancelled flights, claiming it was a BJP conspiracy. He suggested that JMM was attempting to move MLAs to another state due to inclement weather. However, fact-checking organization Only Truth debunked his claim, explaining that the flight cancellations were due to heavy fog disrupting services for over 20 days. Reports from reputable outlets corroborated this, but Kumar continued to justify his false narrative. Netizens mocked his misrepresentation of the facts and his political motives.

12.Made Fake Claims About HP’s Education System

In January 2024, Niranjan’s claim about spending two days in Manali and making statements about the state’s education system was debunked by data, revealing that even Manali had a higher literacy rate compared to Tamil Nadu. His assertions about better facilities in the state were contradicted by the state’s move to seek donations for school development and concerns over the use of Hindu temple funds for schools. The deplorable condition of government model schools in the state’s capital highlighted the deterioration of the education system.

13.Tried To Stoke Controversy In Parliament Security Breach

In December 2023, Niranjan, posing as a journalist, sought to stoke caste-based animosity by spotlighting the name “Sagar Sharma” in connection with the Lok Sabha security breach. By emphasizing Sharma’s surname and linking it predominantly to Brahmins, he aimed to escalate caste tensions surrounding the incident.

14.Peddled DMK Narrative On ‘Thamizhagam’ Controversy

In January 2023 witnessed Niranjan contributing to the misrepresentation of Tamil Nadu Governor RN Ravi’s statements. The governor’s call for using “Thamizhagam” instead of “Tamil Nadu” was distorted by certain media outlets, including alleged journalist Niranjan, leading to the trending of separatist tweets with the hashtag #தமிழ்நாடு.

15.Tried To Blame BJP For Rameshwaram Cafe Blast

Niranjan Kumar falsely reported that BJP member Sai Prasad had been arrested by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) in connection with the Rameshwaram cafe explosion in Bengaluru. Kumar claimed Prasad was involved with suspects linked to the blast, citing unverified sources and insinuating the BJP’s connection to terrorism. This narrative was widely spread by Congress and other Dravidian media outlets, including Sun News and Kalaignar News, fueling regional tensions.

 

However, the NIA clarified that Prasad was only summoned as a witness due to his prior connection to a mobile phone purchased by an arrested suspect. The phone was used by one of the main suspects, but there was no evidence linking Prasad to the blast itself. Kumar’s misleading claims were debunked, but the narrative continued to be propagated by partisan media, fueling misinformation.

16.Peddled Fake News That FM Nirmala Sitharaman Refused To Meet TN CM

In 2021, he was also called out for spreading misinformation about Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman’s refusal to meet Tamil Nadu’s CM EPS. He had stated that the Minister had refused to meet Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Edappadi K. Palaniswami citing budget consultation work.

(With inputs from Asianet News)

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Gems Of Justice BR Gavai

Justice Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai, aka BR Gavai, the present Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of India, has hit headlines for making insensitive comments at a Hindu petitioner while dismissing his petition.

While the judge may have been right in making the order, the harsh thoughtless comments have hurt the majority of Hindus across the country. Let us take a look at some of his gems of statements and orders he has authored over the past few years.

#1 Mocked Hindu Petitioner For Seeking Restoration Of Beheaded Vishnu Idol At Khajuraho

The Supreme Court on 16 September 2025 refused to hear a plea seeking restoration of a beheaded 7-foot idol of Lord Vishnu at the Javari temple in Khajuraho, Madhya Pradesh, in Rakesh Dalal v. Union of India. A Bench of CJI BR Gavai and Justice Augustine George Masih held the matter was for the ASI, not the Court. CJI Gavai told the petitioner, “Go and ask the deity itself to do something now… It’s an archaeological site and ASI needs to give permission etc. Sorry.” Petitioner Rakesh Dalal argued the idol was mutilated during Mughal invasions and government inaction violated devotees’ right to worship.

#2 Wants Nationwide Fire Cracker Ban

On 12 September 2025, Chief Justice of India BR Gavai stressed that the firecracker ban should extend nationwide, not just Delhi, to ensure all citizens enjoy pollution-free air. He highlighted the hardships faced by street workers and daily wagers, noting pollution is a national issue, citing Amritsar as worse than Delhi. The CJI emphasized that policies must consider both public health and livelihoods of those dependent on the firecracker industry. Senior advocates highlighted the severe impact on citizens, while the Court reaffirmed the need for a complete ban unless “green crackers” can be scientifically proven to cause minimal pollution.

#3 “Have Some Decorum, He Is Still Justice Varma” – Advices Lawyer to Address Tainted Judge Yashwant Varma As “Justice Varma”

In a striking courtroom exchange on 21 July 2025, Chief Justice of India BR Gavai reprimanded Advocate Mathews J Nedumpara for referring to Delhi High Court judge Yashwant Varma, embroiled in a cash recovery controversy, simply as “Varma.” Nedumpara, seeking urgent listing of his petition demanding an FIR against Justice Varma, was interrupted by CJI Gavai, who insisted, “He is still Justice Varma. How do you address him? Have some decorum. You are referring to a learned judge. He is still a judge of the Court.” Nedumpara replied, “I don’t think that greatness can apply to him. Matter has to be listed.” CJI snapped back, “Don’t dictate to the Court.” The clash highlighted the judiciary’s internal contradiction, insisting on ceremonial respect for a judge under serious scrutiny. Despite allegations and a pending writ filed by Justice Varma himself, the Court remained firm on maintaining titles and decorum, even as Nedumpara argued that “an FIR has to be registered.”

#4 Stays Action Against Psephologist Who Misled People Through False Data

In August 2025, a bench led by Chief Justice BR Gavai and Justice N.V. Anjaria stayed proceedings against psephologist and Lokniti-CSDS co-director Sanjay Kumar, who was facing multiple FIRs for a now-deleted tweet claiming a sharp decline in voter numbers during the Maharashtra assembly elections. Kumar had apologised, calling it an ‘unintentional error’ caused by a data misreading. The court issued notice on his plea to quash the complaints.

#5 “Interfered” In Decision Taken On Stray Dogs Menace

On 13 August 2025, Chief Justice of India BR Gavai said, “I will look into this,” while responding to concerns over conflicting Supreme Court orders on the stray dog issue. CJI Gavai, heading a Bench, constituted a three-judge bench to examine the matter after advocate Nanita Sharma, for NGO Conference for Human Rights (India), highlighted contradictions. She pointed out that a May 2024 order by Justices J.K. Maheshwari and Sanjay Karol barred indiscriminate killing of canines, while a more recent 11 August 2025 order by Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan directed civic bodies in Delhi-NCR to remove all stray dogs from public spaces within eight weeks. After CJI Gavai intervention, the Supreme Court modified its earlier order on stray dogs in Delhi-NCR, directing release in original areas post-sterilisation and vaccination, except for rabid or aggressive animals. Expanding the issue nationwide, it sought a pan-India policy, imposed costs on NGOs/individuals, and emphasised feeding zones while restricting public feeding to ensure safety.

#6 Said Reservation Like Train Compartment

On a seven-judge bench, contributed to the ruling that states can create sub-categories in the Scheduled Castes for reservation purposes and advocated, in a concurring opinion, for the application of creamy layer exclusion to SCs and STs. Justice BR Gavai, in the ruling on the sub-classification of Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) stated, “I find that the attitude of the categories in the Presidential List opposing such a sub-classification is that of a person in the general compartment of the train. Firstly, the persons outside the compartment struggled to get into the general compartment. However, once they get inside it, they make every attempt possible to prevent the persons outside such a compartment from entering it.”

#7 Said Bulldozer Demolitions Of Accused’s Property Unconstitutional

In a judgment on 13 November 2024, a Supreme Court bench comprising Chief Justice BR Gavai and Justice KV Viswanathan condemned the practice of demolishing properties of individuals merely for being accused or convicted. The Court held that the executive cannot act as judge, emphasizing that arbitrary demolition violates the principles of rule of law, natural justice, and the right to life under Article 21. It reinforced that a house represents years of effort, stability, and family aspirations, and demolition without due process constitutes collective punishment. The judgment laid down strict procedural safeguards: issuance of show-cause notices, personal hearings, documentation, digital portals for transparency, and videography of demolitions. Only unauthorized, non-compoundable constructions can be demolished after exhausting all legal remedies. CJI Gavai highlighted that such executive actions without judicial oversight are wholly arbitrary and an abuse of process, reinforcing constitutional protections against high-handed state actions.

#8 Granted Bail To Manish Sisodia In Delhi Excise Scam “Based On Delay”

On 9 August 2024, a Supreme Court bench led by Chief Justice BR Gavai and Justice KV Viswanathan granted bail to former Delhi Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia in both CBI and ED cases related to the Delhi Excise Liquor Policy. The Court observed that Sisodia had been incarcerated for over seventeen months while the trials had barely commenced, violating his fundamental right to a speedy trial under Article 21. It emphasized that bail cannot be withheld as punishment and that Sisodia required adequate time to inspect over 69,000 pages of documents. Bail was granted with conditions including furnishing bonds, surrendering his passport, and reporting to authorities.

#9 Granted Temporary Bail To Teesta Setalvad After Urgent Midnight Hearing & Then Regular Bail Later

On 1 July 2023, CJI BR Gavai was part of the Supreme Court bench that granted Teesta Setalvad temporary bail after the Gujarat High Court denied her release. The urgent late-night hearing convened a larger three-judge panel following a deadlock in a two-judge bench. Critics highlighted the speed and prioritization of her case, contrasting it with systemic delays for ordinary citizens. Setalvad, accused of falsifying evidence and coaching witnesses in the 2002 Gujarat riots, has strong political ties to Congress. Gavai’s intervention ensured procedural relief, but the move sparked debate over judicial impartiality and perceived preferential treatment in politically sensitive cases.

On 19 July 2023, a Supreme Court bench comprising CJI BR Gavai, AS Bopanna, and Dipankar Datta granted regular bail to civil rights activist Teesta Setalvad in connection with an FIR alleging fabrication of evidence in the 2002 Godhra riots. The Supreme Court quashed the High Court order, granting her bail and ensuring procedural fairness in light of prior interim bail and prolonged litigation.

#10 Stayed Rahul Gandhi’s Conviction In Modi Surname Remark Case

On 4 August 2023, a Supreme Court bench comprising BR Gavai, P.S. Narasimha, and Sanjay Kumar stayed the conviction of Rahul Gandhi in the “Modi surname” defamation case. Gandhi had been sentenced to two years’ imprisonment under Sections 499 and 500 IPC for his remarks linking the Modi surname to thieves. The Court noted the Trial Court gave no reasons for imposing the maximum sentence, which triggered disqualification under Section 8(3) of the Representation of the People Act. Considering the wide ramifications on Gandhi’s political rights and the electorate’s representation, the Court stayed the conviction while leaving the appeal to be decided on merits.

#11 Held Arrest Of NewsClick Founder Prabir Purkayastha As “Illegal”

On 6 March 2024, a Supreme Court bench of Justices BR Gavai and Sandeep Mehta invalidated the arrest and remand of 74-year-old journalist Prabir Purkayastha under the UAPA, citing violation of Article 22(1) of the Constitution. The Court held that neither Purkayastha nor his counsel were provided the grounds of arrest in writing, rendering the detention illegal. The judgment emphasized that written communication of arrest or detention is sacrosanct, extending PMLA principles to UAPA cases. While quashing the arrest and remand orders, the Court directed Purkayastha’s release on furnishing bail bonds, without commenting on the merits of the case.

#12 Strikes Down Electoral Bonds Scheme As “Unconstitutional”

On 15 February 2024, a 5-judge Constitution Bench including Justice BR Gavai and Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud unanimously held that the Electoral Bonds Scheme violates the right to information under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution. The Court ruled that anonymous political contributions obscure transparency, enabling quid pro quo arrangements and undermining informed voting. While the scheme aimed to curb black money, alternative methods like electronic transfers and electoral trusts exist. Consequently, the scheme and related amendments to the Income Tax, Companies, and Representation of Peoples Acts were struck down. SBI and ECI were directed to disclose past electoral bond transactions.

#13 Ordered Release Of Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Convicts

On 11 November 2022, a Bench of Justices BR Gavai and BV Nagarathna ordered the immediate release of six convicts; Nalini, Ravichandran, Jayakumar, Santhan, Murugan, and Robert Pius, who had served over three decades in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case. The Court held that the Tamil Nadu Governor was bound by the State Cabinet’s 2018 recommendation for their premature release under Article 161 and erred in forwarding files to the Union. Citing conduct, rehabilitation, and parity with co-convict Perarivalan, the Court directed their release, emphasizing that prolonged delay violates the constitutional clemency scheme and the convicts’ rights.

#14 Fined Prashant Bhushan 1 Rupee For Contempt

On 31 August 2020, a 3-judge bench of Arun Mishra, BR Gavai, and Krishna Murari, JJ. found advocate Prashant Bhushan guilty of criminal contempt for tweets criticizing the Supreme Court and sitting/former CJIs. The Court imposed a nominal fine of Re. 1, warning that non-payment would result in three months’ imprisonment and a three-year bar from practicing in the Court. The judgment emphasized that lawyers must respect the judiciary while exercising free speech, particularly in sub judice matters, and that malicious allegations undermine public trust. Fair criticism is allowed, but Bhushan’s tweets exceeded permissible bounds and showed no remorse.

#15 Asked “Why So Touchy?” When Swami Prasad Maurya Insulted Ramcharitmanas

The Supreme Court on January 25, 2024, stayed criminal proceedings against Samajwadi Party leader Swami Prasad Maurya, accused of insulting the Shri Ramcharitmanas and allegedly inciting the burning of its copies. A bench of Justices BR Gavai and Sandeep Mehta noted that Maurya’s remarks represented a “line of thought” and he could not be held responsible for subsequent acts. The Court observed, “Why are you so touchy about these things?” Notices were issued to the UP government and the complainant, and the Supreme Court agreed to examine Maurya’s special leave petition, pausing action while reviewing the matter further.

#16 Who Will Decide What Is Deceit In Religious Conversion, Asks Gavai

On 16 September 2025, the Supreme Court questioned the enforceability of stringent anti-conversion laws in States like Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand, and others, regulating interfaith marriages. Chief Justice B.R. Gavai highlighted the difficulty in determining whether a religious conversion is fraudulent. Senior advocates C.U. Singh, Indira Jaising, and Vrinda Grover argued that these Freedom of Religion Acts empower third parties to file complaints against interfaith couples, impose harsh penalties including 20-year to life sentences, and shift the burden of proof onto converts, effectively curbing religious freedom under Article 25. The court scheduled further hearings in six weeks.

CJI Gavai retires on 23 November 2025.

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Hosur Launches Drive To Convert Garbage Dumps Into Green Corners

Hosur Launches Drive To Convert Garbage Dumps Into Green Corners

Hosur City Municipal Corporation (HCMC) in Tamil Nadu’s Krishnagiri district has launched a major initiative to transform garbage dumping spots across the city into litter-free and green zones, in a bid to improve urban aesthetics and strengthen solid waste management.

The corporation has identified more than 500 Garbage Vulnerable Points (GVPs) across its 45 wards, despite the presence of door-to-door waste collection by conservancy workers. Officials said a section of residents continues to dump waste at street corners and public places, prompting the civic body to roll out a beautification drive. Corporation Commissioner Mohammad Shabbir Alam launched the programme last week by selecting 50 of the identified GVPs for conversion into landscaped areas.

Of these, 10 have already been developed at a cost of Rs 10,000 each, where plants and grass have replaced the garbage mounds. Residents and conservancy staff have been asked to water and maintain the greenery in their neighbourhoods. The initiative is estimated to cost Rs 5 lakh for the 50 sites.

“People were specifically told not to throw, burn, or bury waste in open or public spaces. Under the Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016 and the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies (TNULB) Rules, 2023, strict action will be taken against violators,” a corporation source said. Residents can report violations or non-collection of garbage through helplines 1800 599 0447 and 90422 98901.

Currently, 587 conservancy workers are engaged in door-to-door collection across HCMC limits. While many households are cooperating, officials admitted that a few pockets remain where residents refuse to hand over garbage. A survey is underway to map such areas, following which a detailed action plan will be implemented to ensure 100 per cent compliance.

Resident welfare associations have also been asked to encourage members to cooperate with the civic body. The impact of the drive is already visible in some areas. A traffic police personnel near RC Church said a former garbage dumping spot has been turned into a small garden.

“Earlier, it was filled with garbage and construction debris. Now the area is clean and safer for pedestrians, especially at night,” he said. With the conversion of dumping spots into green corners, HCMC hopes to not only beautify Hosur but also instil a sense of civic responsibility among its residents.

-IANS

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Chhattisgarh: 12 Maoists, Including 2 Area Committee Members, Surrender In Narayanpur

maoist surrender chhattisgarh naxals

In a significant development in Chhattisgarh’s Narayanpur district, twelve active Maoists surrendered before Superintendent of Police Robinson Guria on Wednesday, marking a major success for the ongoing Maoists eradication campaign. Among those who laid down arms were two area committee members, considered key figures in the insurgent network.

The total bounty on the surrendered individuals exceeded Rs 18 lakh, underscoring the importance of this breakthrough. “Of them, five are female and seven are male Maoists,” Guria said. The surrender is being seen as a direct result of the government’s robust rehabilitation policy, which has been actively encouraging Maoists to return to mainstream society.

Officials confirmed that the group included members from various wings of the Naxal organisation, such as LOS-CNM, PPCM, Military Latoon, and Jantana Sarkar. Their decision to surrender reflects growing disillusionment within the ranks and increasing faith in the state’s reintegration efforts. Superintendent of Police Robinson Guria, who accepted the surrender, said that the move would not only weaken the operational strength of Maoist groups in the region but also send a strong message to others still engaged in armed rebellion.

The state government had previously announced rewards totalling over Rs 18 lakh on their heads, which will now be nullified following their surrender. This event comes amid a broader national push to eliminate Naxalism. Union Home Minister Amit Shah has set March 2026 as the deadline for the complete eradication of the movement.

The numbers reflect steady progress; in 2024, a total of 928 Maoists surrendered, and in the first four months of 2025 alone, 718 have already laid down arms. Additionally, more than 241 Maoists have been killed in security operations this year. The Narayanpur surrender is being hailed as a morale booster for security forces and a validation of the government’s dual strategy of firm military action combined with inclusive rehabilitation.

As the deadline for eliminating Naxalism approaches, such developments are expected to accelerate, bringing hope for lasting peace and stability in affected regions. With continued efforts and community engagement, the vision of a Naxal-free India is steadily becoming a reality—one surrender at a time.

-IANS

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.