Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam chief and part-time, work-from-home politician Vijay entered politics claiming he would bring real change but his actions tell a very different story. While his initial steps were watched with cautious optimism and patience by the public as is often afforded to a political newcomer he continues to repeat the same mistakes, showing a clear lack of learning or reflection. This persistent political immaturity is evident not only in his public appearances but also in his poor execution on the ground.
A glaring example of this came during his first state-level rally ahead of the 2026 elections, which was intended to cover Tiruchi, Perambalur, and Ariyalur. Despite the ambitious announcement, he failed to even reach Perambalur and returned quietly to the comfort of his Chennai residence, all thanks to logistical failures and poor planning.
Even his much-hyped address in Tiruchi on 13 September 2025, delivered from atop his campaign vehicle, was marred by technical glitches. Out of the 20-minute speech, only one or two minutes were audible a communication disaster for someone positioning himself as a serious contender in state politics.
All these instances strongly suggest that Vijay lacks the seriousness, preparation, and intent to truly engage in public service. He may speak of change, but he has shown little evidence that he understands what that requires.
Adding to this, his political positions are increasingly indistinguishable from the ruling DMK, the very party he claims to oppose. His policy pitches often read like slightly repackaged versions of existing DMK narratives an approach that shows a lack of originality and strategic vision.
Vijay frequently invokes the legacies of stalwarts like Kamarajar and MGR, but the gap between his claims and his conduct is glaring. Leadership is built on vision, consistency, and action not empty rhetoric and stage-managed appearances. So far, Vijay has offered more spectacle than substance.
Until he proves otherwise, his political venture appears to be more about optics than outcomes a far cry from the legacy of leaders he claims to emulate. Below are some of examples why he can’t be
Vijay – A Hypocrite Who Cannot Stand by His Own Stance
Opposes Three-Language Policy, Yet Promotes It at Home and in His School
Vijay has vocally opposed the three-language policy a move aligned with Dravidian political orthodoxy. However, his own son, Jason Sanjay, studied at the elite American International School in Chennai, where students are offered a range of language options, including French, Spanish, and Korean, alongside English. Some IB schools even allow the choice of Hindi.
The stated goal of the three-language policy is to equip marginalized students with multilingual skills, improving their access to global opportunities such as careers in translation, diplomacy, and multinational corporations. Yet, Vijay opposes this policy while personally benefiting from its ethos in his own family and educational ventures.
Adding to the contradiction, Vijay runs Vijay Vidyashram, a CBSE-affiliated school in Padur, where Hindi is taught and foreign languages like French are part of the curriculum. This selective application of ideology where he resists central policies for the public while embracing them privately exposes a glaring double standard.
Silent on Kamarajar, Vocal on EVR
Vijay has frequently projected K. Kamarajar as one of TVK’s ideological icons and his cadres even called him ‘Illaya Kamarajar‘, yet he remained completely silent when DMK MP Tiruchi Siva made insensitive remarks against the late leader. Siva claimed that Kamarajar needed air-conditioning to sleep and made unverifiable claims about his final moments statements many saw as attempts to diminish Kamarajar’s legacy.
This silence stands in sharp contrast to Vijay’s quick condemnation of a UPSC prelims question that referred to E.V. Ramasamy Naicker (EVR) by his full name including the caste-associated suffix “Naicker.” Vijay labelled the mention as “deeply offensive” and accused the exam body of casteist framing.
Critics argue this selective response reflects ideological opportunism, not principled politics. If EVR and Kamarajar are both part of the party’s ideological framework, why is one defended fiercely while the other is ignored when under attack? This inconsistency erodes TVK’s credibility as a value-driven movement.
Wants Governor’s Post Abolished, Then Meets Governor for Political Leverage
Vijay has called for the abolition of the Governor’s post, echoing demands from fringe political narratives. At a rally in October 2024, he declared that the Governor’s role should be eliminated, calling it outdated and undemocratic.
Yet, just two months after this, he personally met Tamil Nadu Governor R.N. Ravi to submit a petition demanding better safety measures for women following a sexual assault incident at Anna University. While his concern for women’s safety is legitimate, his willingness to engage the very institution he wants abolished demonstrates political inconsistency. Critics question, Is the Governor’s office dispensable only when it’s politically convenient?
If Vijay truly respects constitutional principles, he would know that the Governor’s role enshrined in the Constitution by Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, whom TVK claims as a guiding figure is not something that can be casually discarded.
Claims Environmental Concern, Flies Private for Political Events
In yet another contradiction, Vijay visited Ekanapuram village to support farmers opposing the Parandur greenfield airport, citing environmental and agricultural concerns. He condemned the project for endangering farmlands and water bodies, branding it “anti-people.”
However, shortly after, he chartered a private flight to attend a political event in Coimbatore a mode of transport that directly contradicts his supposed environmental stance. Private flights are notorious for their carbon footprint and are often criticized as symbols of elitism and environmental disregard.
Vijay, during his visit to Parandur, alleged that the proposed airport would destroy 90% of farmland and 13 water bodies, calling the project “anti-people.“ He also questioned why the DMK, which had opposed projects like the Salem eight-lane expressway and Kattupalli port, was supporting the Parandur airport. However, a closer look at the Airports Authority of India (AAI) pre-feasibility report and the Tamil Nadu government’s decision-making process reveals that Vijay’s statements are either misleading or based on incomplete information.
Vijay: An Ivory Tower Politician Detached from Ground Reality
Since launching his political party, Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK), actor-turned-politician Vijay has maintained a conspicuous distance from the public, making only rare appearances. Most of his political communication is filtered through social media posts, earning him the moniker “part-time, work-from-home politician.” Despite lofty promises to bring about change, Vijay’s actions repeatedly expose a politician who operates from an elite, detached mindset, far removed from the everyday concerns of the people he claims to represent.
Shunning the People: No Time for His Own Supporters
A viral video from June 2025 starkly illustrates Vijay’s disconnect. A long-time fan and TVK supporter, Ayyappan from Salem, rode overnight to Neelankarai hoping to catch a glimpse of Vijay on his 51st birthday. Instead, he returned disappointed and disillusioned.
“I left Salem at 11:30 PM on my bike and reached Vijay’s residence around 6:30 AM. But he didn’t come out to greet us. We were told he’d appear by 12:30 PM, then at 1 PM, but that didn’t happen. Later, someone said he had quietly left in his car. No one saw him. It’s frustrating and hurtful.” Ayyappan told reporters.
He compared Vijay unfavorably to Rajinikanth, who traditionally appears publicly to acknowledge fans. “Would it have hurt him to wave at us for two minutes?” he asked.
The frustration reached a breaking point when Ayyappan declared he would no longer support TVK, stating he would rather vote for NOTA than back a leader who doesn’t respect his own supporters. Adding insult to injury, TVK workers reportedly responded, “One vote doesn’t matter.”
Flood Relief from a Safe Distance
During Cyclone Fengal in December 2024, which brought historic rainfall and devastation to districts like Krishnagiri and Villupuram, most political leaders hit the ground. DMK ministers, AIADMK’s Edappadi Palaniswami, and PMK’s Anbumani Ramadoss all visited affected areas and oversaw relief efforts in person.
In contrast, Vijay chose to stay within the safe confines of his Panaiyur party office, where he invited 300 flood-affected families to come to him for assistance. Aid was distributed at his headquarters not in the disaster zones. Victims were reportedly transported by bus to receive relief.
This approach drew widespread criticism online and offline. Critics questioned the optics of summoning victims to a political office rather than showing solidarity on the ground.
Many saw this as performative politics an event more suited for cameras than for crisis response. A politician who truly cares about people, critics argue, would go to the people not expect them to come to him.
Delayed Response to Protesting Sanitation Workers
Another example of Vijay’s distanced leadership emerged in August 2025, when Greater Chennai Corporation sanitation workers who had been protesting since 3 July 2025 over labor rights and working conditions were finally invited to meet Vijay on 11 August 2025 at TVK’s Panaiyur office.
Instead of visiting the protest site like most concerned leaders might, Vijay rationalized his absence by claiming that a visit would have caused traffic disruptions. In a social media post, he wrote, “To avoid public inconvenience, the workers themselves came to the TVK office.”
While he expressed solidarity with their cause and offered legal support, the eight-day delay before any meaningful interaction raised concerns about how responsive and proactive he would be as a political leader in a real-time crisis.
Across these incidents, a consistent pattern emerges: Vijay rarely steps out of his comfort zone, preferring to operate from behind screens, office desks, and controlled environments. Whether it’s failing to greet fans, refusing to visit disaster zones, or delaying engagement with protesting workers, his leadership appears reactive, stage-managed, and aloof.
Vijay’s Integrity Under the Scanner: A Pattern of Evasion, Manipulation, and Manufactured Credibility
While actor-turned-politician Joseph Vijay markets himself as a clean, youth-driven alternative in Tamil Nadu politics, his personal and political record suggests a very different story. Long before stepping into the political arena, Vijay was already facing serious allegations from tax evasion and income concealment to social media manipulation. Today, these unresolved issues have resurfaced, calling into question his personal integrity, commitment to transparency, and fitness for public life.
Tax Evasion and Concealed Income
Vijay’s financial conduct came under judicial scrutiny when the Income Tax Department imposed a penalty of ₹1.5 crore in 2022 for failing to voluntarily disclose ₹15 crore in income during FY 2015-16. The controversy stemmed from a search and seizure operation conducted in September 2015, which revealed that Vijay had received nearly ₹5 crore in unaccounted cash from the producers of Puli, in addition to ₹16 crore paid via cheque.
Initially denying the existence of unreported income, Vijay later “amicably agreed” to declare an additional ₹15 crore to avoid prolonged legal battles. His retrospective disclosure did little to impress authorities, who argued he would never have disclosed the amount if not for the raid. The IT Department also disallowed deductions claimed by Vijay, including ₹64.7 lakh in fan club expenses and depreciation worth ₹17.81 lakh.
Despite multiple appeals, the matter remains mired in controversy, with Vijay challenging the penalty order under Section 271AAB(1). The fact that a public figure with political ambitions needed legal compulsion to comply with tax laws speaks volumes about his commitment to the rule of law.
“Anti-National Mindset” – Court Slams Vijay Over Rolls-Royce Tax Evasion
Vijay’s reputation took another hit in 2021 when the Madras High Court fined him ₹1 lakh for attempting to evade entry tax on an imported Rolls-Royce. In a strongly worded judgment, Justice S.M. Subramaniam slammed the actor for “anti-national mindset“, stating that such tax evasion reflects a mindset contrary to constitutional values.
“These actors portray themselves as champions of social justice but evade tax and act in a manner not in consonance with statutory obligations,” the judge noted.
The court emphasized that real heroes pay their taxes and contribute to the nation’s development, rather than indulging in luxuries while denying the state its due. Vijay’s silence about his profession in his affidavit also drew ire, with the court noting that his stardom was revealed only through his lawyer’s intervention another sign of obfuscation.
Social Media Engineering & Manipulation
While Vijay’s Instagram post from August 2025 boasting 12.5 million likes was touted as a record-breaking feat, digital analysts and political observers weren’t convinced. Despite having just 14.1 million followers, the video a simple selfie from a political rally received more likes than posts by global celebrities like Cristiano Ronaldo and Virat Kohli.
A closer look at the post’s performance reveals several red flags:
- The video saw an engagement spike of over 11.6 million likes in less than 24 hours.
- Instagram analytics indicate a 4,392% increase in followers and a 1,013% jump in engagement ratio in just a week.
- The number of comments also soared by 2,843%, raising doubts about the authenticity of the interaction.
Such disproportionate growth in engagement especially compared to established global celebrities has led many to suspect that the numbers are not organic but likely the result of third-party services, including bots or purchased likes and followers.
Perhaps the most damning evidence lies in the geographical source of the engagement. Data suggests:
- Only 1.02% of likes are from Tamil Nadu, the core of Vijay’s fan base.
- A significant portion 38% originates from states like Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, and Bihar, where Vijay’s political or film-related influence is minimal.
- 26% of engagement comes from Assam, West Bengal, and Chhattisgarh, and another 18% from Maharashtra, Gujarat, Rajasthan, and Punjab.
Given Tamil Nadu’s population demographics, especially among the Instagram-active youth (ages 20–35), experts argue it’s highly unlikely for a political post to achieve such traction particularly when most engagement comes from regions with little to no connection to Vijay or his political outfit, TVK (Tamizhaga Vetri Kazhagam).
Critics claim that this recent post may be yet another manufactured publicity stunt, estimating that such engagement inflation could cost anywhere between ₹40 to ₹50 lakh, if done through paid engagement platforms. The goal, they argue, is to project Vijay as a politically powerful figure with mass appeal using numbers that don’t hold up to scrutiny.
What appears to be a viral success on social media may, in fact, be a strategic digital façade aimed at inflating political credibility. As questions grow around the authenticity of Vijay’s Instagram popularity, there is increasing demand for transparency and independent verification of the metrics involved in such posts. Observers call this yet another instance of “old wine in a new bottle” a familiar tactic dressed in a new form to create an illusion of mass support.
Deceptive Tactics – Buying Actress Fan Pages to Fake TVK’s Youth Popularity
Long before the Instagram controversy, Vijay’s team had allegedly purchased a Facebook page originally created for actress Megha Akash. With over 4 million followers, the page was quietly rebranded with TVK imagery and political slogans, misleading the public into believing the party had massive youth support.
This PR stunt was exposed during a live interview, where a political analyst demonstrated how the page’s transparency data revealed its original purpose. The commentator criticized TVK’s reliance on fake online optics instead of building genuine grassroots movements, warning that such hollow tactics have failed for many politicians before.
Box Office Manipulation
Vijay’s tendency to inflate his successes isn’t limited to social media. His 2023 film Leo was advertised as a ₹600 crore blockbuster. But when producers filed official earnings with the IT department, the theatrical revenue was just ₹160.56 crore. The remaining revenue came from digital and satellite rights, not from box office performance exposing yet another case of misleading public perception.
Just like with Leo, Vijay seems to be relying on hype over substance, optics over outreach, and illusion over integrity raising serious concerns about his suitability for public office.
For a man who projects himself as the clean, youthful face of Tamil Nadu’s political future, Vijay’s record tells a different story of tax evasion, financial concealment, fake online support, and PR-driven deception.
Voters deserve leaders who lead with integrity, accountability, and authenticity—not those who manipulate metrics to manufacture mass appeal. As Tamil Nadu’s politically aware youth evaluate their choices, the critical question remains: Is Vijay building a movement—or just playing a part?
TVK Cadre Indiscipline
One of the most alarming aspects of Vijay’s party, is not merely its leadership vacuum, but the undisciplined, chaotic behavior of its cadres. Far from the image of a disciplined political force, TVK increasingly resembles an unruly fan club with little regard for public order, property, or safety. Despite repeated incidents of damage and disorder, Vijay has remained conspicuously silent raising serious questions about his control over the party he leads.
Madurai Conference: A Political Disaster Masquerading as a Rally
At TVK’s first state-level political conference in Madurai 21 August 2025, a combination of poor planning, cadre lawlessness, and sheer negligence turned what was billed as a show of strength into a humanitarian and logistical nightmare.
Mass Destruction of Property : A Dindigul-based supplier reported that over 500 of 15,000 chairs hired for the event were destroyed, with attendees climbing, jumping, and even piling 10 at a time onto single chairs. Workers attempting to intervene were met with aggression and had to retreat. The supplier, unsure of compensation, lamented that “half the investment is gone.”
Due to the damage and mismanagement, local suppliers refused to provide chairs for the party’s second event, forcing TVK to source furniture from Kerala, an embarrassing blow to a party claiming to represent Tamil Nadu pride.
Despite temperatures soaring above 39°C (102°F), thousands were brought in from 10 AM, while the event didn’t start until 4 PM. Supporters collapsed from heat exhaustion and dehydration, with hospitals reporting over 2,000 cases of medical distress.
Shocking visuals emerged of infants separated from parents and rushed to medical tents due to unbearable conditions. Critics lambasted TVK for putting political optics over public welfare.
Rather than providing relief, TVK commercialized survival necessities:
- Water bottle: ₹60
- Curd rice: ₹70
- Veg biryani: ₹120
- Ice cream: ₹100
These inflated prices were allegedly linked to the party charging ₹10,000 per stall—prioritizing profit over people. TVK’s much-promoted “drone sprayers” were dismissed by attendees and experts alike as a cruel publicity stunt, utterly ineffective for the scale of suffering. Roshan, 18, from Kotagiri, died after suffering breathing difficulties in the overcrowded venue. Though initially treated on site, he collapsed again on the way home and was declared dead on arrival at a hospital. His death sparked outrage over the reckless crowd management.
Footage emerged showing attendees “caged” behind metal barricades, unable to move. Volunteers were seen throwing water bottles at people as if they were animals an act widely condemned on social media and by human rights observers. To prevent fans from climbing electric poles, as happened in the first conference, organizers greased the poles and bars, showing a preference for crude physical deterrents over meaningful discipline or engagement.
The event descended into a lawless free-for-all: Mobile phones and wallets were stolen near food stalls. Police complaint booths had to be set up to deal with the chaos. Alcohol consumption and even liquor bottles discarded near temples were reported an insult to religious sentiments.
What was supposed to be TVK’s grand political moment turned into a crisis of ethics, management, and accountability. Observers compared the scenes to a “Gaza-type” humanitarian breakdown, where basic dignity was sacrificed at the altar of a personality cult.
Chennai Chaos: Thiruvanmiyur Incident
On 28 March 2025, TVK’s general council meeting at Thiruvanmiyur created another public nuisance, traffic snarled for hours, vehicles parked indiscriminately, drums and loud music disrupted the area, residents and commuters were forced to endure an unwelcome Friday ordeal
Massive banners and cut-outs of Vijay covered the streets, mimicking a film premiere more than a political gathering.
Tiruchirapalli Campaign Launch: Another Chapter in Disorder
TVK’s statewide campaign launch in Trichy on 13 September 2025, further highlighted the party’s inability to maintain order.
Airport Chaos: Crowds broke police barricades as Vijay landed. Slippers, trash, and torn posters littered the airport roads showcasing a complete lack of planning and discipline.
Banner Vandalism and Firecrackers: TVK supporters tore their own party banners burst unauthorized firecrackers ignored police warnings, creating a hazardous environment. Vijay’s convoy, meant to cover 8 kilometers, took over 4 hours, and his speech was delayed significantly, throwing the entire schedule into disarray. With cadres spilling into major roads, including Pudukottai Road and Palakkarai Underbridge, traffic came to a standstill. Shops shut down, causing water shortages for attendees stuck for hours. Trichy’s normal life was held hostage by what was supposed to be a political outreach.
Coimbatore Airport: Chaos Repeats Itself
Back in April 2025, Coimbatore Airport witnessed similar disorder, TVK cadres breached the 50-person limit, parked irresponsibly on main roads, damaged barricades, grills, and trolleys in the airport, ignored airport security and disrupted operations. There was no coordination with authorities, and once again, cadres behaved like uncontrolled fans—not disciplined political workers.
From Madurai to Trichy, Chennai to Coimbatore, TVK’s public events have consistently exposed a lack of discipline, foresight, and respect for public space. Rather than serving as a platform for constructive political engagement, these gatherings have become platforms for chaos, property damage, and even tragedy.
If Vijay genuinely intends to be a political leader and not just a glorified fan club president he must urgently rein in his cadres, implement rigorous training and codes of conduct, and demonstrate a serious commitment to public order. Until then, TVK will remain not a political force, but a spectacle loud, chaotic, and ultimately unsustainable.
Vijay’s TVK Substitutes DMK To Become TN’s New Anti-Development Force
Perhaps the most telling indictment of Vijay and his party, Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK), lies in their anti-progressive, opportunistic stance—a strategy that appears less about principles and more about political mimicry. Far from offering a genuine alternative, Vijay has positioned himself as a shadow of the very establishment he critiques, recycling the playbook of the DMK’s opposition era with little innovation or ideological depth.
Both Opposed Parandur Greenfield Airport Plainly
Vijay, during his visit to Parandur, alleged that the proposed airport would destroy 90% of farmland and 13 water bodies, calling the project “anti-people.“ He also questioned why the DMK, which had opposed projects like the Salem eight-lane expressway and Kattupalli port, was supporting the Parandur airport. However, a closer look at the Airports Authority of India (AAI) pre-feasibility report and the Tamil Nadu government’s decision-making process reveals that Vijay’s statements are either misleading or based on incomplete information.
The Airports Authority of India (AAI) conducted a detailed study to identify the most suitable site for Chennai’s second airport, considering locations like Padalam, Thiruporur, Pannur, and Parandur. Parandur emerged as the best option due to factors such as airspace restrictions at other sites, availability of 5,369 acres of land, better connectivity through the Chennai-Bengaluru Expressway, and fewer displacements compared to Pannur. Additionally, Parandur offers significant potential for future development, unlike the more densely developed Pannur site. Vijay’s claims about the project destroying 90% of farmland and 13 water bodies lack substantiation and overlook the thorough environmental and social impact analysis in the AAI report. Critics suggest that Vijay’s opposition to the project is driven by political motives, with his visit to the protest site viewed as a publicity stunt. Aviation experts argue that Parandur is the most feasible site for the airport, and relocating the project would cause delays and increased costs.
A similar approach was taken by the DMK in 2019 when it criticized the AIADMK government while in the opposition, but once it came to power, the party acknowledged the airport as a crucial need for the state’s economy.
Both Opposed NEET
During the executive committee meeting in Panaiyur on 3 November 2024, which was presided over by Vijay, a resolution was passed calling for the abolition of the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET). This comes despite data indicating that more underprivileged students, including those from tribal communities, have been able to secure medical seats through the exam in recent years.
Even the DMK, which had previously claimed to have the ‘Secret Weapon’ to make the central government to abolish NEET, switched its stance when Chief Minister MK Stalin admitted in a recent assembly speech that the central government holds the power to revoke NEET, contradicting earlier claims. TVK’s Vijay holds a similar stance on abolishing the exam, and it remains to be seen whether he will reverse his position like the DMK in the next NEET exam season.
Both Called For Abolition Of Governor Post
TVK’s resolutions on 3 November 2024 reiterated their stance on abolishing the Governor’s post. However, in the wake of the sexual harassment case at Anna University, which allegedly involved a DMK functionary, and widespread speculation that the DMK might protect the accused, TVK party chief Vijay sought the Governor’s intervention. It seems that Vijay has now come to recognize the importance of having a neutral figure above the government, capable of questioning the state’s actions when constitutional mechanisms fail. Previously, however, without fully understanding the role and significance of the office, he had called for the abolition of the Governor’s post, which was both impractical and unconstitutional. This stance has been a hallmark of the DMK since its inception, with the party’s founder C.N. Annadurai famously describing the position of Governor as “redundant as a goat’s beard.” This sentiment continues to this day, as evidenced in the 2024 Lok Sabha election manifesto, where the DMK again called for the abolition of the Governor’s post.
Similarly, in January 2024, Udhayanidhi Stalin, the current Deputy Chief Minister and scion of the DMK, led the party’s Youth Wing in passing a resolution calling for the abolition of the Governor’s post in Tamil Nadu. The resolution argued that the governor was attempting to run a parallel administration, undermining the authority of the state’s elected representatives. The resolution, passed at the 2nd DMK Youth Wing Meet, asserted that abolishing the position of Governor was essential to safeguard democracy.
Both Opposed Three-Language Policy
Vijay has strongly opposed the three-language policy, despite his own son, Jason Sanjay, studying at the American International School in Chennai, where languages like French, Spanish, and Korean are offered alongside English. In some IB schools, students also have the option to choose Hindi. The rationale behind the three-language policy is to provide marginalized students— even many of whom currently lack access to government schools—a chance to learn a third language. This would enable them to pursue careers as translators, communicators, and open doors to international job opportunities.
However, Vijay, along with other Dravidian leaders and the DMK, oppose marginalized students to venture beyond Tamil Nadu. They seem to believe these students should remain confined to the state, study locally, and take on menial jobs, ultimately serving as a political vote base through emotional appeals. The hypocrisy lies in the fact that this “two-language policy” exception doesn’t apply to Matriculation, CBSE, or international boards, which offer a wider array of language options. Yet, Vijay appears intent on following this same narrow-minded stance.
Both Opposed Central Govt On Other Matters
TVK chief Vijay has adopted a stance similar to that of the DMK, opposing any initiatives proposed by the central government. DMK chief and Chief Minister MK Stalin argued that the legislation posed a threat to “alter India’s polity forever.” Similarly, during the TVK party resolution, Vijay strongly opposed the “one nation, one election” proposal, criticizing it as an anti-democratic move by the BJP-led Union government.
In addition, TVK has mirrored the DMK’s tendency to pander to Islamist interests. The party has called for the withdrawal of the Waqf (Amendment) Bill amid reports of vast areas of land and entire villages being claimed by the Waqf Board.
Last Word
Vijay’s political avatar is not the arrival of a leader — it is the extension of an actor’s vanity project. He lectures about morality while hiding behind the walls of luxury, tweeting sermons from the comfort of air-conditioned rooms, never once dirtying his hands in the struggles of ordinary Tamils. His hypocrisy on language, his silence when Kamarajar was dragged through the mud, and his flip-flops on the Governor reveal a man without spine or substance. He has mastered one role alone — that of a hypocrite who tailors his politics to applause.
TVK is not a party but a bloated fan club, an unruly mob that tramples on women, steals from the poor at rallies, and leaves behind chaos and even death. This is the culture Vijay has cultivated — a culture where blind loyalty is worshipped and accountability is despised. His followers sell tickets, his managers mint money, and his cadres run amok — all while he plays the “clean” messiah from a distance.
Let’s be blunt: Vijay is no Kamarajar, no MGR, not even a shadow of them. He is a tax evader who posed as a saint, a master of box-office manipulations dressing up deceit as success, and a coward who mistakes fan hysteria for political capital. Tamil Nadu deserves leaders who stand in the streets with the people — not a superstar politician who hides behind PR and lets his fandom do the dirty work.
Until he proves otherwise, Vijay will remain nothing more than what he is today: a pampered actor playing politician, a hypocrite without courage, and the head of a fan club masquerading as a movement.
Kaathavaraayan is a political writer.
Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.
