Home Blog Page 719

“Vaazhga Chinnavar, Our Future”: DMK MPs Sing Paeans For Party’s Crown Prince Udhayanidhi Stalin While Taking Oath, Kanimozhi Doesn’t Even Mention Stalin

The newly elected MPs took their oaths in Parliament in various languages like Sanskrit, Tamil, Malayalam, Kannada, etc. In previous oath-taking ceremonies, each MP would battle it out for saying the best slogan of them all – praising the motherland or their favourite deity.

Standing out from the rest were the 24 DMK MPs from Tamil Nadu. Most of them ended their vows with praises and uttered slogans in praise of DMK scion Udhayanidhi Stalin.

Coimbatore MP Ganapathy Rajkumar who won against TN BJP chief Annamalai concluded his oath by saying, “Long live our future Udayanidhi Stalin.

Central Chennai MP Dayanidhi Maran ended his oath with “Long live Tamil, Long live Kalaignar, Long live Periyar, Long live Anna, Long live Muthuvel Karunanidhi Stalin, Long live Udhayanidhi”

Kanchipuram MP Selvam ended with “Sing praises of Periyar, Anna, Kalaignar, Long live Thalaivar Thalapathy, Long live youth leader Udhayanidhi Stalin

Arakkonam MP S Jagath Rakshakan said, “Long live Tamil, long live leader Kalaignar, Long live Thalapathy”

Salem MP TM Selvaganapathy, Kallakurichi MP Malaiyarasan Arani MP Tharaniventhan, and Tiruvannamalai MP CN Annadurai ended their oaths similarly with, “Long live Kalaignar, our CM, our future Udhayanidhi” while also thanking a few DMK ministers.

Thanjavur MP Murasoli, Perumbalur MP Arun Nehru, Pollachi MP Easwarasamy, Erode MP KE Prakash, Vellore MP Kathir Anand said, “Long live Tamil Nadu, may DMK win, long live Thalapathy, our future Udhayanidhi

Dharmapuri DMK MP A Mani, North Chennai MP Kalanidhi Veerasamy, South Chennai MP T Sumathi alias Tamizhachi Thangapandian ended her oaths with praises to Karunanidhi, MK Stalin and Tamil.

Tenkasi MP Rani Srikumar had a list of names she said slogans for – these included Karunanidhi, Periyar, MK Stalin, Kanimozhi, KKSSR, as well as DMK scion Udhyanidhi Stalin!

Namakkal MP VS Matheswaran was refreshing because he did not mention any of the above-mentioned DMK leaders names!

Surprisingly MPs such as TR Baalu, A Raja, and Thanga Tamizhselvan just took the oath without any other frills and unnecessary words and phrases.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Dravidian Model: Kanchipuram Collector Announces Increased Financial Aid For Church Repairs

Kanchipuram District Collector Kalaichelvi Mohan has announced that the DMK government will soon disburse financial aid for the repair and renovation of churches. This initiative, which began in the fiscal year 2016-17, now includes increased funding based on the age of the church buildings.

According to an official release, funding will cover the installation of stands for reading the gospel, sound systems, altars, sacred vessels, benches for devotees, and compound walls. The financial aid has been significantly increased:
– Churches aged 10-15 years will now receive ₹10 lakh instead of the previous ₹2 lakh
– Churches aged 15-20 years will get ₹15 lakh, up from ₹4 lakh
– Churches over 20 years old will receive ₹20 lakh, an increase from the earlier ₹6 lakh

A committee led by the Collector will review applications, conduct site inspections, and assess the needs before recommending eligible churches for funding. The financial aid will be disbursed in two installments via electronic transfer to the church’s bank account, according to an official release.

It is noteworthy that HR&CE department in Tamil Nadu has been routinely taking temple money and using it for purposes that are not related to the temple or rituals connected to the temple. Also, neither do churches and mosques come under the purview of any Religious and Charitable Endowments department under the state government. Critics question how and why a state government must fund the repair of churches when it does not partake in the money from these institutions.

Additionally, the work done in the name of repairs in Tamil Nadu have been seen as a farce. In 2023, a portion of the eastern entry tower at Srirangam Sri Ranganathaswamy Temple collapsed. This occurred during an ongoing effort to mend the first and second-level compound walls of the temple entrance exposing the quality of “repair work” allegedly done by the HR & CE department. In addition to this, temple premises are being used as parking lots for officials to park their vehicles.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

DMK Scion Udhayanidhi Stalin Granted Bail By Bengaluru Court In “Eradicate Sanatana Dharma” Remarks Case

(Image Credit: Deccan Herald)

On 25 June 2024, DMK’s Udhayanidhi Stalin, the Tamil Nadu Minister for Youth Welfare and Sports Development, appeared before the Special Magistrate’s Court in Bengaluru to face trial for making derogatory remarks about Sanatana Dharma.

As reported by ANI news, Udhayanidhi Stalin, scion of the DMK, was granted bail on a ₹1 lakh cash surety. The 42nd People’s Representative Court in Bengaluru adjourned the matter to 8 August 2024, following a request from the advocate representing Udhayanidhi Stalin in the case related to the ‘eradicate Sanatana Dharma‘ remarks.

The court proceedings were initiated based on a complaint filed by social activist V Paramesha, who alleged that Udhayanidhi Stalin’s remarks had defamed him, his religion, and people of the Hindu faith. The court took cognizance of offences under IPC Sections 153 (provocation with intent to cause riot), 298 (uttering words with intent to wound religious feelings), and 500 (defamation).

The Backstory

Addressing a conference hosted by the Tamil Nadu Progressive Writers and Artists Association, titled “Eradicate Sanatana Conference,” on 2 September 2023, in Teynampet, Chennai, DMK Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin said, “The title of this conference has been excellently coined. You’ve named it as ‘Eradicate Sanatanam Conference’ and not ‘Oppose Sanatanam Conference’, so my best wishes to that.

Udhayanidhi Stalin also said that some things need to be eradicated and not opposed. “Mosquitoes, dengue, flu, malaria, corona – we should not oppose these things. They’ve to be eradicated completely. Same is the case with Santanam (Hinduism). Our first work should be to eradicate Sanatanam instead of opposing it. So, my appreciations to you all for giving an apt title to the meeting”, DMK Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin said.

He also further went on to say “What is Sanatanam? The name Sanatanam itself comes from Sanskrit. Sanatanam is opposed to equality and social justice. What is the meaning of Sanatanam? Eternal or something that can’t be changed. Something that can’t be questioned. That is the meaning of Sanatanam.

The speech sparked widespread controversy across India, leading to numerous legal cases filed against DMK scion Udhayanidhi Stalin.

Previously, on 6 March 2024, the Madras High Court declined to issue a quo warranto against DMK Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Minister P.K. Sekarbabu, and Nilgiris Member of Parliament A. Raja regarding the controversy surrounding their comments on eradicating Sanatana Dharma.

Justice Anita Sumanth ruled that the relief sought by the writ petitioners was premature, noting ongoing First Information Reports (FIRs) across various police stations without any convictions. The judge acknowledged that the remarks targeting Sanatana Dharma were objectionable and divisive. She stressed the importance of criticism being constructive and based on factual accuracy, particularly when made by incumbent Ministers. Justice Anita Sumanth highlighted the necessity for public figures to uphold constitutional values and refrain from statements that undermine social harmony. Despite arguments that Minister Sekarbabu had only attended the conference and not spoken on the subject, the judge noted that participation alone could imply endorsement of the conference’s themes.

She also condemned statements likening Sanatana Dharma to diseases such as HIV, AIDS, dengue, and malaria as misleading and contrary to constitutional principles.

In March 2024, the Supreme Court Bench comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta rebuked DMK scion Udhayanidhi Stalin for his contentious remarks on Sanatana Dharma, stating that he had “misused his privileges.” The court made these remarks while addressing Udhayanidhi Stalin’s request to consolidate First Information Reports (FIRs) filed against him regarding his alleged statements.

The Bench remarked, “You have abused your rights… You know what you have said. You should have realized the consequences. You are a Minister, not a layman,” during the hearing.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Former TN Police Officer Anusuya Who Survived LTTE-Rajiv Gandhi Bomb Blast Calls For TASMAC Ban Following Kallakurichi Hooch Tragedy

The recent Kallakurichi hooch tragedy, which has resulted in the loss of 58 lives and numerous hospitalizations, has sparked widespread outrage in the state. There is now a growing chorus demanding stringent measures to curb illicit liquor and advocating for a complete ban on TASMAC. Adding her voice to these calls is a former police officer, who echoes the sentiment of returning to the Kamaraj era when alcohol was completely prohibited, aligning with Mahatma Gandhi’s views on the matter.

Anusuya Daisy Ernest, a retired police officer who once oversaw security on the night of Rajiv Gandhi’s assassination and survived the suicide bombing, expressed deep regret over the current administration’s shortcomings. During her tenure as ADSP in the Prohibition Enforcement Wing, she recalled maintaining strict control over the region, effectively curbing the presence of illicit liquor but she expresses current deaths are alarming.

In a recent interview with reporters, Anusuya Daisy Ernest reflected on her extensive career in law enforcement. “I served in the Prohibition Enforcement Wing in Nagapattinam district from 2014 to 2015, and later as ADSP in Villupuram headquarters from 2016 to 2018, currently I’m retired. Currently, illicit liquor is a big issue that has claimed more than 50 people and it is very sad to think about it because people are drinking poisoned liquor like this, and it feels like a big infectious disease. When there is infectious disease people will die like this and now it is worse than that.”

With 37 and a half years of dedicated service, including her impactful tenure in Nagapattinam, she recounted her efforts to eradicate alcohol-related issues. Anusuya Daisy said, “Even in this advanced age of science it is painful to witness such deaths because I have worked in the police department for 37 and a half years and today, I have retired and am getting paid from people’s tax money today, it is giving me so much pain. I worked in Nagapattinam district for a year and a half in the Prohibition Enforcement Wing, and I used all of my knowledge, strength, and police training to eradicate alcohol there.” She added, “People put up a banner on Tiruvarur road thanking me for eradicating liquor menace, so much so that I eradicated the liquor, the poisonous liquor, the illicit liquor, and arrack, I controlled it all. After completing it and working successfully for one and a half years without any incident, there was not even a single lock-up death, not a single criminal died, and we seized a substantial amount of illicit liquor. I can say that because we ensured we gained the trust of the public that the police will take action, we changed their minds towards the police and I could be successful in my work. Sometimes, there are police who are accomplices with brewing criminals for mere bribery, but not all. Today there is no poisonous liquor death throughout Tamil Nadu because it is because of the police and the superintends successful work.”

Later, Anusuya likened the Kallakurichi hooch tragedy to a catastrophic train accident, drawing from her experience in the Villupuram district, which once encompassed Kallakuruchi before it became a separate district. During her tenure there, she emphasized, there were no incidents like the Sakthi School riots or the Marakkanam hooch deaths. Reflecting on this, she expressed satisfaction that their effective measures then had prevented such tragedies. She also recalled overseeing the Kalavarayan Hills and its surrounding seven subdivisions without encountering similar issues.

However, she lamented the current wave of deaths linked to illicit liquor sales and poisoning, describing it as a disgrace to the entire police force. She noted with concern that even local ward members now know where illicit liquor is sold in their areas, and urged everyone, including councillors, to take responsibility and act vigilantly to combat this scourge. She concluded by urging the Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu to take decisive action to completely prohibit and shut down TASMAC. Pointing out that this incident marks the second tragedy during his tenure, she emphasized the need to prioritize the lives of the people of Tamil Nadu. She advocated for a return to the era of Kamaraj, when TASMAC was banned, as a necessary step towards ensuring public safety and well-being.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

When EAM S Jaishankar’s Father Ensured A Lenient Regime In DMK-Ruled TN During Emergency Imposed By Indira Gandhi

In the annals of Indian bureaucratic history, few stories stand out as starkly as that of K. Subrahmanyam (KS), father of current External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar, during the tumultuous period of the Emergency in 1975-77. Contrary to popular speculation, KS maintained a principled distance from the corridors of power, adhering to what he believed was an unwritten code of conduct for civil servants.

KS’s philosophy was rooted in the ideal of service to the state as an abstraction, eschewing political connections to further one’s career. This stance was put to the test during the Emergency, a period that significantly weakened the bureaucracy and fostered clientship relations between IAS officers and politicians.

In 1975, KS was removed from his position at the Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses (IDSA) and transferred to Tamil Nadu’s Board of Revenue. The following year, he found himself in an unprecedented situation. The DMK government in Tamil Nadu had been dissolved, its leaders imprisoned, and President’s rule imposed. PK Dave, a career bureaucrat, was sent as a special adviser to the governor and appointed KS as the home secretary of Tamil Nadu.

This role placed KS at the heart of internal security matters during one of India’s most challenging periods. While he did not openly defy regulations, KS often chose to follow his conscience rather than rigidly enforce rules. He viewed the Emergency as deeply anti-democratic, reminiscent of the colonial era when freedom fighters were held in British jails.

KS’s approach, coupled with that of his friend and Finance Secretary Gugan, who had even stronger views and close ties with DMK members, resulted in Tamil Nadu having one of the most lenient regimes during the Emergency. This leniency raised eyebrows in Delhi, with questions being asked about the state’s seemingly relaxed stance.

It is likely that the central government would have intervened to impose stricter measures in Tamil Nadu had it not been for the 1977 elections that saw Indira Gandhi’s resounding defeat. This episode in KS’s career, while known to some of his contemporaries, is often overlooked in discussions about his professional life.

This lesser-known chapter in the career of K. Subrahmanyam showcases a bureaucrat’s moral compass in action during one of India’s darkest periods.

Source: Chapter 11 of the book – Security Beyond Survival: Essays For K Subrahmanyan

Silencing The Sirens Of Discord: A Comprehensive Approach To Combating Fake News In India

India, a land where ancient traditions meet modern innovation, embodies a vibrant tapestry of cultures, languages, and faiths. However, this very diversity creates a fertile ground for a modern-day weapon of mass destruction – fake news. In the digital age, fabricated stories and manipulated visuals can travel at lightning speed across the internet, wreaking havoc on this delicate social fabric. Unlike traditional media with its editorial oversight, the internet empowers anyone to become a publisher. While this democratizes information, it also allows the unfettered spread of misinformation, with potentially devastating consequences.

The Destructive Power Of Fake News

The threat of fake news isn’t a distant worry; it’s a present danger. Doctored videos and fabricated stories have ignited mob lynchings, fuelled communal tensions, and eroded public trust in institutions. From claims about religious minorities spreading diseases to misinformation about government policies, fake news thrives by exploiting pre-existing social fault lines. It can:

  • Incite Violence: Malicious rumours, often laced with religious or social undertones, can quickly morph into mass hysteria, leading to riots, mob violence, and loss of life.
  • Erode Public Trust: Fake news undermines public confidence in democratic institutions and sows discord within communities.
  • Hinder Progress: Misinformation can derail important public health initiatives, disrupt economic policies, and hamper disaster relief efforts.
  • Stifle Free Speech: When genuine information gets buried under an avalanche of fake news, it undermines the very foundation of a healthy democracy – informed discourse.

The Limitations Of Existing Solutions

The current legal framework in India lacks the teeth to effectively combat fake news. Traditional defamation laws are cumbersome and time-consuming, often proving inadequate for the fast-paced nature of online misinformation. While some platforms have adopted voluntary content moderation policies, their effectiveness is limited.

Adopting a Singapore-style POFMA (Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act) might seem like a solution, but India’s unique social landscape demands a more nuanced approach. A centralized system struggling to keep pace with the sheer volume and diversity of content in 22 official languages and hundreds of dialects is a recipe for ineffectiveness.

A Multi-Pronged Approach For India

Combating fake news in India requires a multi-pronged approach that addresses the specific challenges faced by the nation:

  • Strengthening the Legal Framework:
    • A dedicated Fake News Authority established by Parliament, with regional branches for linguistic and cultural sensitivity.
    • A clear definition of “fake news” that differentiates malicious misinformation from unintentional errors or satire.
    • Graduated Penalties:
      • For individuals: fines, community service, and imprisonment for repeat offenders.
      • For publishers and platforms: hefty fines for knowingly publishing fake news, and potential suspension/revocation of licenses for repeated violations.
    • Right to Appeal: Content creators and publishers should have a clear right to appeal against flagging, with robust appeals process to prevent censorship.
    • Independent Oversight & Transparency: The Fake News Authority should function independently of the government, with transparent decision-making processes.
  • Empowering Fact-Checking Organisations:
    • Increased government funding for independent fact-checking organizations.
    • Collaborations between fact-checkers, journalists, and social media platforms to debunk false information quickly and effectively.
    • Standardizing fact-checking methodologies and ensuring easy public access to verified information
  • Promoting Media Literacy:
    • Integration of media literacy programs into school curriculums, teaching students how to critically evaluate information online.
    • Public awareness campaigns that educate citizens on how to identify and avoid fake news.
    • Encouraging responsible digital citizenship, where users flag suspicious content and verify information before sharing.
  • Social Media Platforms Take Responsibility:
    • Implement stricter content moderation policies that target fake news dissemination.
    • Partner with fact-checking organizations for content verification.
    • Develop algorithms that identify and demote fake news content, promoting verified information in user feeds.
    • Increase transparency in content moderation practices.

The Road To A More Informed Future

The fight against fake news is a continuous battle. By creating a robust legal framework, empowering fact-checkers, promoting media literacy, and holding social media platforms accountable, India can take a crucial step toward a more informed and peaceful future. This fight is not just about safeguarding national security, but also about protecting the very essence of a vibrant democracy – the free flow of truthful information that empowers citizens to make informed choices.

India’s rich tapestry deserves to be protected from the corrosive effects of fake news. By adopting a multi-pronged approach that combines strong legal deterrents, empowered fact-checkers, and media clutter.

Ganesh Kumar is a geo-political analyst.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Jayaprakash Narayan And Nanaji Deshmukh: The Two Karmayogis Who Fought Against Indira’s Draconian Emergency

1974, Patna – India was in turmoil, as a vast wave of discontent, swept the nation. The heady days of idealism were gone, as a nation came into terms with the loss of innocence. A nation that saw corruption, political skullduggery become the norm, of rising inflation, unemployment. And in that period, the face of the protest emerged against Indira Gandhi’s autocratic rule. Just 3 years earlier, Indira had swept to power, with the victory over Pakistan in the War, and the emergence of Bangladesh, fuelling her popularity. But the euphoria of the war victory had come off, the people were forced to deal with the harsh realities of life. Jayaprakash Narayan aka JP was the one giving a voice to the anger in the masses, as he led a huge procession on the streets of Patna. He had earlier led the Nav Nirman Andolan in Gujarat against the Chimanbhai Patel Government there. Just a couple of months he had asked for a Total Revolution from the masses and students, against the growing corruption. As JP led the procession in Patna, he was brutally lathicharged by the police. He was the target, and the police still continued raining blows on him, until another older man, shielded him, and took the blows, all the while escorting him to safety. The man who shielded JP from the police blows was Chandikadas Amrut Rao Deshmukh, better known as Nanaji Deshmukh.

Two men, from two vastly different backgrounds- Jayaprakash Narayan and Nanaji Deshmukh. Both born on the same date, Oct 11, separated by a gap of 14 years. JP was from Bihar’s Saran district, his father was a lower Government official, and he later went on to study in the US too. Nanaji on the other hand, was from Maharashtra’s Hingoli district, lost his parents at an early age, had to struggle in his childhood, and later rose up the ranks of the RSS.  Their ideologies too differed, where JP was socialist, left leaning, Nanaji’s was more rooted in the Integral Humanism of the Jan Sangh. And yet on that fateful day in Patna, the paths of both these men would cross. It was destined to be so, if JP was the face of the Total Revolution, Nanaji was the brains behind it, as well as the Janata alliance that came later. JP took the Revolution to the masses, Nanaji organized the funds for it, coordinated it, and when the Government cracked down, during the Emergency, he oversaw the underground movement.

Nanaji was one of the men who built up the Jan Sangh in UP, brick by brick, when the then chief Guru Golwalkar had sent him there as an RSS pracharak to Gorakhpur. Arriving at a place, that had no funds, no base, no organization, Nanaji undertook the task of building the RSS from scratch, staying in Baba Raghavdas home, cooking meals for him. Within 3 years there were 250 Shakhas just in Gorakhpur itself, the also established the first Saraswati Shishu Mandir there in 1950. If BJP has a solid base in Gorakhpur, the reason is the foundation laid by Nanaji there. He was one of the trilogy, who spread the Jan Sangh in UP, the others being Deen Dayal Upadhyaya and Atal Bihari Vajpayee. Where Upadhyaya provided the ideological soul of the Sangh, Vajpayee took the message to the masses with his oratory, it was Nanaji who was instrumental in organizing and coordinating. Even when RSS was banned following the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi, it was Nanaji who kept things going, with publications from the underground.

On the other hand, JP’s trajectory was somewhat different. In a sense like Nanaji, he did have to work hard for his education. Nanaji sold vegetables as a young boy to support himself, while as a student in US, JP did a whole lot of odd jobs from picking grapes, washing dishes, as a mechanic at a garage to even a slaughter house. Unable to pay the fees at Berkeley, JP had to transfer from one University to another in US, before graduating in sociology finally. It was his experiences with the working class, that attracted JP to the Leftist ideology, especially the works of Marx and M.N.Roy. Even when he joined the Congress, during the Freedom struggle, JP was part of the Congress Socialist Group, a left wing group within the party, that included Ram Manohar Lohia, Ashok Mehta and was headed by Acharya Narendra Dev. A rebel with a derring do attitude, JP was arrested numerous times during the freedom struggle. One of the more inspiring anecdotes relates to the Quit India struggle, when he went underground, and had a daring escape from the Hazaribagh Central Jail, and walked to Gaya, along with his associate Yogendra Shukla whom he carried on his shoulders.

Though on the other side of the political divide, Nanaji Deshmukh, enjoyed a respect and support across the entire political spectrum. By 1957 he had established the Jan Sangh across UP, and it soon became a powerful political force in it’s own right. The first ever non Congress Govt in UP, was due to the efforts of Nanaji, who forged an alliance with Chaudhary Charan Singh and Ram Manohar Lohia, the first ever such grouping. Jan Sangh was to the Right, Conservative, while Lohia represented the more Left liberal aspect, and Charan Singh represented the farming community. Nanaji in fact outwitted Chandra Bhanu Gupta, considered a political giant, not once but thrice. He first managed to get Gupta’s nominee defeated in the Rajya Sabha, and then forging an alliance with other socialist groups defeated him twice in Lucknow and Maudaha later. Gupta had immense respect for Nanaji, whom he called a modern day “Nana Phadnavis”. He had a good relation with Ram Manohar Lohia, and the Jan Sangh- Socialist parties alliance, would be the first major opposition to the Congress party then. He also took an active part in Vinobha Bhave’s Bhoodan Movement.

Emergency

At some point of time, these two great men would find their paths intersecting. And it came in 1974 during the Sampoorna Kranti( Total Revolution) launched by JP against Indira Gandhi’s misrule, the ever increasing corruption and rising inflation. JP was the movement’s visible face, but in the background was Nanaji coordinating every aspect of it, raising funds, sending the messages. As General Secretary of the Lok Sangarsh Samiti, Nanaji was the man who kept the underground movement, when Indira cracked down on it, during the Emergency. Nanaji was himself a wanted man, and managed to give the Government a slip during the Emergency, just getting out at the last moment. On June 25, 1975, Nanaji managed to get together a small group that consisted among others Subramaniam Swamy, M.L.Khurana, Ravindra Verma and Dattopant Thengadi. It was Nanaji who drew up the main plan for the movement during Emergency, of publishing underground news bulletins and pamphlets, setting up of underground cells, staging protest demonstrations, raising funds, helping the families of those detained. Nanaji himself was arrested later on June 29, 1979, but by then he had put the entire network into place, which ensured, that the underground movement would not die out. Both JP and Nanaji were arrested during the Emergency, but their spirit would be the guiding force for the movement. It was therefore not a surprise that when Indira lifted the Emergency and elections were held in 1977, Nanaji once again came to the forefront as the architect of the Janata alliance. Due to his immense political contacts, Nanaji managed to put together the formidable alliance, consisting of the Jan Sangh, Janata Party and other outfits. Nanaji himself won from Balrampur in 1977, and he played a key role in the Janata victory, coordinating the entire election effort. He however refused to take up a Cabinet minister position, stating he wanted to dedicate his life to social service.

“Singhasan Khali Karo ke Janata aati hai” thundered JP during the Ramlila rally of 1975, that quote was from the famous poet Ramdhari Singh Dinkar. JP was greatly influenced by Dinkar’s works, and the latter was a great admirer of JP, both these men shared a close bonding. It is said, that when JP was seriously ill, Dinkar had gone to Tirupati to pray for his health, saying that if there was a life to be taken it was his. Coincidentally, Dinkar passed away just when JP was recovering from his illness. JP was detained at Chandigarh, he however was later release due to a kidney problem was on dialysis for long. He managed to see his dream come true, of the Janata Government come into power, and Indira defeated. However he would be saddened by the way, the Janata leaders wasted the mandate with their internal squabbles and ego clashes.

Maybe it was for this reason, that Nanaji did not want to be a part of the Government. At a later stage in his life, Nanaji often remarked that he admired the Vanavasi Ram, more than the Raja Ram. He actually walked the talk, of retiring from politics, and dedicating his life to social service. Nanaji knew what poverty was, he had grown up with it, and the upliftment of the poorer sections was his life long aim. The Deen Dayal Research Institute was set up by Nanaji to promote grass roots level development in 1969. The motivation was a visit to Chitrakoot, a place that was holy due to it’s association with the Ramayana, where Lord Ram, had spent his exile in. The Chitrakoot that Nanaji visited though was a far cry from what he had read, steeped in backwardness, illiteracy and superstition. Moved by it’s condition, Nanaji made a resolve to change the face of Chitrakoot and also make it the base for his social reforms. “Har Haath ko denge Kaam, har Kheth ko denge Paane” ( Work to All, Water to every field) was the motto of Nanaji, as he did pioneering studies in anti poverty programs, cottage industry and rural development. Gonda in UP, and Beed in Maharashtra, two of the country’s most backward districts, was where Nanaji focused his efforts on.

And that led to the establishment of the Chitrakoot Grameen Viswavidyalaya, which he named after Mahatma Gandhi. It was India’s first ever rural University, and Nanaji was it’s first chancellor. The main aim was to provide students in rural areas, access to quality high education. The university has been doing great work in promoting courses on rural development, mass education and awareness among the rural people and sustainable development.

Neither JP nor Nanaji are around now, but their legacy and spirit will always continue to inspire. Two men who were true karmayogis, for whom power was not an end in itself. Two men, who led others to power, but did not accept it themselves. It was destiny, that two such great karmayogis were born on the same date.

Sources:

http://www.bjp.org/images/kamal_sandesh/ks_e_mar_02_2010.pdf

http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/nanaji-deshmukh-the-main-force-behind-jayaprakash-narayans-agitation-for-total-revolution/1/435501.html

(This article was originally published by Ratnakar at historyunderyourfeet.wordpress.com and has been republished here with permission.)

Ratnakar Sadasyalu is a blogger with a passion in movies, music, books, and history. A techie by profession, and a writer at heart. Author of City of Victory a book on Vijayanagar Empire.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

No, Guv Ravi Did Not Call For Banning Kula Deivams; DMK-Supporting Dravidianists Peddle Fake News 

Dravidianist supporters of the DMK in Tamil Nadu are continuously engaging in spreading false propaganda. It seems they are unable to rest unless they target either the BJP or the Governor every single day. Throughout the day, we have uncovered numerous instances of fake news being circulated, including misleading edits targeting Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, the RSS, and now Tamil Nadu Governor RN Ravi. These falsified reports are being disseminated in regional languages, misleading the public.

Recently, Dravidianists fabricated a news card under the guise of a regional news channel,Polimer News‘. Upon receiving the news, the channel promptly refuted it and exposed the falsified card. Subsequently, many of the vigorous spreaders of this misinformation on social media platforms deleted their posts and comments.

In an attempt to divert attention from the mishandling of the Kallakuruchi hooch tragedy, they created a fake news card claiming it to be the words of Tamil Nadu Governor RN Ravi. The falsified card purportedly quoted Governor Ravi as advocating for the ban of clan deity worship, blaming it for turning Tamils into drinkers and linking it to deaths related to alcoholism.

The fake news card stated, Clan deity worship should be banned. It is the clan deities that turn Tamils ​​into drunkards; Clan Deity, Nattar Deity, and village temple festivals that are the basis for alcoholism-related deaths should be banned. – Governor Ravi”

Below are some of the now-deleted fake posts propagated by supporters of the DMK on social media:

Image

Image

Previously, on the issue concerning the Chidambaram temple, Tamil Nadu Governor RN Ravi alleged that forced virginity tests, specifically the two-finger test, were conducted on minor girls suspected to be victims of child marriage. RG Anand, a member of the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR), supported these allegations in May 2023.

NCPCR member Anand tweeted that after conducting inquiries in Chidambaram, he confirmed,All the allegations made by the Governor are true. He also mentioned that a detailed report would be submitted to the NCPCR Chairperson Priyank Kanoongo regarding his findings.

Responding to reports that disputed the investigation’s findings, Anand clarified, It is regrettable that a few media outlets published untrue statements about the NCPCR’s investigation in Chidambaram.He further reiterated his stance to journalists in Salem, stating,The claims made by Governor R.N. Ravi are true.He explained that through inquiries with the affected families and verification of police records, they confirmed the use of the two-finger test on the girls, with police records indicating intact hymen as evidence.

Anand clarified, Some sections of the media reported statements contradicting the Governor’s claims, which is not accurate. I am providing this explanation today to correct the misinformation.”

Image

Image

However, Sun News, a mouthpiece of the DMK, denied these and called them allegations.

Image

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

TN: Speaker Appavu Rebukes Dairy Minister Mano Thangaraj For Off-Topic Criticism Of BJP During Dairy Debate During Assembly Session

During the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly session that commenced on 20 June 2024, Speaker M Appavu reproached Minister Mano Thangaraj of the Milk and Dairy Development portfolio for attempting to critique the ruling BJP government at the Centre while responding to the debate on grant requests on 22 June 2024.

Thangaraj participated in discussions concerning the Dairy Department’s subsidy request, where he also unveiled new initiatives. However, his address took a controversial turn as he launched into a critique of the BJP’s policies, accusing them of taking control of various institutions, intimidating opposition parties, and engaging in divisive propaganda.

Speaker Appavu intervened promptly, admonishing Thangaraj for straying from the debate’s focus. Speaker Appavu said, “We drop the word ‘false’ from the Assembly records, (it’s) untruthful .. Come to the subject, come to the subject.”  Minister Mano Thangaraj justified that it is necessary for a political party to speak on politics, “Mr. Chairman, we as a political party should talk a little about politics, we are standing after the end of a critical election, I will finish in the time you have given me, please I’m asking you to allow me to speak.”

Appavu emphasized the importance of parliamentary etiquette and urged Thangaraj to adhere to the established norms of decorum and not to speak like in a political rally on the Assembly floor. Despite Thangaraj’s attempt to justify his remarks as pertinent to political discourse following a critical election, Appavu reiterated the need for relevance and civility within departmental debates. The Speaker redirected Thangaraj to discuss matters pertinent to the dairy sector, instructing him to refrain from irrelevant discussions.

Again Speaker Appavu warned, “They have spoken in the debate on the grant request of the Milk and Dairy Development department, and everyone’s wish is to answer it, and we should go beyond that… you can just touch touchstone of reality. It is not polite if you speak like you are speaking outside in the (political) platform, the assembly has some civility and you have to behave according to it, but if you speak beyond that, it is not good.”

Later, Minister Thangaraj reassured that he would uphold the decorum of the assembly sessions. However, the Speaker urged the minister to drop the issue, indirectly referencing senior ministers. Despite this, the minister cited the Human Development Index once more and uttered that India tops in false propaganda. This prompted the Speaker to express anger, demanding that the minister stick to the relevant topic. The Speaker warned that anyway the irrelevant remarks would be expunged from the assembly records. Subsequently, Thangaraj shifted his focus to the dairy industry, announcing plans for the purchase of 1.8 million liters of milk and assuring the procurement of 6.6 million liters in the near future.

(with inputs from DTNext)

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

POCSO Case Filed Against School Teacher Fathima Kani For Alleged Relationship With Minor Student

A case under the POCSO Act has been registered against a 42-year-old teacher from a private school who developed romantic relationship with 17-year-old student, causing a significant uproar due to the teacher’s betrayal of trust and ethical misconduct.

Fathima Kani, aged 42, hailing from Madurai, was employed as an educator at a private school located in Kariapatti, Virudhunagar district. The situation unfolded as Fathima Kani started showing special attention to a Plus-2 student at the same school. Following an incident where the student met with an accident and fell ill, Fatima displayed notable care and concern for the student, including assisting with academic tasks. Upon learning of these actions, the school administration allegedly directed that Fathima be transferred to a school in Melur, Madurai.

Despite the transfer order, it is alleged that the teacher continued communicating with the student. After completing his 12th grade, the student went missing on the 15 June 2024, prompting distress among his parents. Extensive searches at the residences of his friends and relatives yielded no results, leading to the parents filing a report at the Aviyur police station.

During the ensuing investigation, it was discovered that the student and the 42-year-old computer teacher, Fathima Kani, were involved in a romantic relationship. The school administration was notified, and the police, suspecting further misconduct due to reports of other instances involving the teacher and students, probed deeper, eventually locating Fathima at a lodge in Puducherry. Subsequently, law enforcement rushed to the lodge in Puducherry to rescue the student and apprehend Fathima. Upon questioning, Fatima claimed that she was taking the student to Puducherry for college enrollment, raising doubts about her actions considering the student’s parents.

A POCSO complaint was filed against Fathima, highlighting her apparent failure to inform the parents of the college arrangement. Notably, Fathima Kani is married and has two children.

(with inputs from Vikatan)

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.