Home Blog Page 600

Dravidianists In Coimbatore Detained Try To Throw Beef At BJP Office

Dravidianists In Coimbatore Detained Try To Throw Beef At BJP Office

On 13 January 2024, Aathithamizhar Katchi members were detained in Coimbatore for attempting to throw beef meat inside a BJP office as part of their protest.

The act of protest was in response a BJP functionary’s objections to a beef stall set up near the Veeramathi Amman Temple in Udayampalayam, Coimbatore. In response, five Aathithamizhar Katchi activists marched towards the Coimbatore BJP office, raising slogans and demanding the arrest of the BJP functionary. As they attempted to throw beef meat at the office, police intervened and arrested them before they could carry out their actions.

Context

Tensions escalated in Udaiyampalayam, a village on the outskirts of Coimbatore, over a beef biryani stall set up near the Veeramathi Amman Temple. Villagers protested, citing its proximity to the temple and a nearby school as violating local norms. The village, home to temples including Mariamman, Veeramathi Amman, and Karupparayan, had previously regulated such stalls in public areas near temples or schools.

The pushcart eatery, operated by Ravi and his wife Abitha, faced objections from BJP executive Subramani, who demanded its removal. An argument ensued, with Ravi initially agreeing to relocate the stall but Abitha refusing. Subramani recorded the exchange and posted the video on social media, claiming that the village supported the decision to prohibit beef sales and was known to CPM councillor V. Ramamoorthy.

Later, it is alleged that Abitha filed a complaint with the Coimbatore Police Commissioner, alleging that Subramani had threatened them on 25 December 2024, and again on 5 January 2025. She questioned why beef was being singled out while other non-vegetarian foods like fish and chicken were sold in the same area. Following her complaint, the police registered a case against Subramani under Sections 351(2), 126(2), 192, and 196.

The case triggered unrest among villagers, with over 1,000 locals staging a protest near the temple. They condemned the police action against Subramani and reiterated their demand to remove the beef stall. Protesters argued that the stall’s location near the temple and school was inappropriate and offensive to public sentiment.

In response to the escalating tensions, the village committee, reportedly on orders from the headman, evicted seven roadside eateries, including Abitha and Ravi’s pushcart. This decision was criticized by CPM and CPI leaders, who petitioned the police commissioner to protect food rights and ensure the couple’s safety.

Ramamoorthy acknowledged that the couple had initially informed him of their plans to open the stall but said the location they ultimately chose—closer to the temple—had caused opposition from right-wing groups. He said there were no legal restrictions against selling beef but attributed the backlash to the stall’s proximity to the temple. Meanwhile, Tamil Nadu BJP president K. Annamalai called for a thorough investigation, stating only part of the video had been released.

Subscribe to our TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram channels and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Vishnuvardhan Says Rajini’s ‘Billa’ Didn’t Do All That Well; Rajini’s Publicist Responds

Vishnuvardhan Says Rajini’s ‘Billa’ Didn’t Do All That Well; Rajini’s Publicist Responds

Director Vishnuvardhan has stirred a hornet’s nest by claiming that the original superhit film ‘Billa’, featuring Rajinikanth in the lead, didn’t do all that well when it released in 1980, prompting a sharp response from Rajinikanth’s publicist, Riaz Ahmed, who has pointed out that the film was a silver jubilee hit and that Vishnuvardhan could confirm this with Suresh Balaji, the producer of the original version.

Director Vishnuvardhan, who has been promoting his upcoming film ‘Nesippaya’, which features Akash Murali and Aditi Shankar in the lead, recently gave an interview to a channel during which he spoke about his film ‘Billa’, which features Ajith Kumar and Nayanthara in the lead. While talking about his film, he made a remark about the original film ‘Billa’, which was released in 1980 and featured Rajinikanth in the lead.

Referring to Rajinikanth-starrer Billa, Vishnuvardhan said, “Do you know the truth? ‘Billa’ did not actually run all that well. Did any of you know? It did not run all that well. It made me wonder, ‘Am I going to do this film?’ Then I had to see what I actually liked in the film. That was when I realized that they had taken a dark character and made the film. That is a great idea.”

Now, Rajinikanth’s publicist has taken to his X timeline to set the record straight.

Tagging Vishnuvardhan, he wrote, “Dear @vishnu_dir sir, I would like to politely bring to your attention that the 1980 release #Billa was a Silver Jubilee Hit . You may kindly confirm this with the producer of the original version, Mr Suresh Balaji. I humbly request you to ensure accuracy in your statements to avoid sharing incorrect information. #RajjniBillaBlockbuster #ThalaivarNirandharam”

Interestingly, Vishnuvardhan’s film ‘Billa’, featuring Ajith, was a remake of the R Krishnamoorthy’s ‘Billa’, featuring Rajinikanth in the lead and produced by well-known producer Suresh Balaje. The film, along with Rajinikanth, also featured Sripriya and Balaji, and was the remake of a Hindi film called Don, featuring Amitabh Bachchan in the lead.

–IANS

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Siddaramaiah-Shivakumar Power Tussle Likely To Overshadow Congress Legislature Party meet

Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah denies any power-sharing pact with Dy CM Shivakumar, affirming they'll follow the high command's instructions.

The infighting in the ruling Congress in Karnataka is likely to escalate as the camps of Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and Deputy CM and state chief DK Shivakumar are most likely to take a confrontational position over power-sharing in the CLP meeting scheduled for Monday evening.

Though the leaders, who will be attending the Congress Legislature Party (CLP), are claiming that the meeting’s agenda is to discuss the party’s convention to be organised on January 21 in Belagavi, sources claimed that the discussion on power-sharing and dinner party politics will take place.

The sources stated that following the statement of CM Siddaramaiah that his chair is not vacant, bitterness has grown between the Siddaramaiah and Shivakumar camps. Speaking to the media on Monday, Congress MLA H.C. Balakrishna stated that Dy CM D.K. Shivakumar will become the Chief Minister after Siddaramaiah.

“The matter of power-sharing is discussed in the media and not among the MLAs. After CM Siddaramaiah, it is Shivakumar, who will come to that post. Who else is the CM candidate? However, whether Shivakumar will become the CM in this term will be decided by the high command.”

Reacting to the demand of the Vokkaligasa Sangha to make Shivakumar the CM, he stated, “It is not possible to make one the CM if someone is demanding. They might have demanded representation for the community. The final decision will be taken by the high command.”

Minister for Transport Ramalingareddy, stated, “Any changes in the Congress party, whether it is related to the state president or the Chief Minister, the high command will take a call. They will decide if any changes are to be made.”

“I am not a contender for the post of the state president. The Chief Minister post is not vacant. In today’s meeting, the discussion will be focused on the Belagavi convention and no other issues will be discussed,” Minister Reddy stated.

Minister for PWD Satish Jarkiholi, stated, the high command will take a call in the party. They will decide on who will become the CM or the state party president.

“There is no haste in this regard. The high command will decide at an appropriate time. The media is giving half-truths regarding the issue of change of the CM,” Minister Jarkiholi stated.

National General Secretary Randeep Singh Surjewala is arriving in Karnataka to discuss the Belagavi convention and some other issues will also come up for the discussion. The other matter will include a discussion on the Internal reservation, he stated. When asked about the demand for a Dalit CM, Minister Jarkiholi stated that CM Siddaramaiah is in charge and it won’t be possible to accommodate another CM now, he said.

“I do not know about the discussion on power-sharing. Our party President D.K. Shivakumar will offer special prayers to gods and there is nothing wrong with it. He has been doing it for 40 years and will continue in future as well,” he maintained.

Senior leader R.V. Deshpande, stated that the speculation about change of CM is a media creation. “There is no vacancy as far as CM’s post is concerned as of today. Hence, the CM is saying right. There is no vacancy…If Dy CM D.K. Shivakumar aspires to become the CM, there is nothing wrong with that also. I may also have the aspiration, and no one can stop me. What CM is saying is that at present he is the CM and hence there is no vacancy,” he stated.

When asked about many leaders coming forward to stake claims for key posts, he said, “I am a nine-term legislator and am I not eligible? Ultimately, the party will make a decision. I am nobody and I belong to the Congress party. The Congress party has to decide on who should be the CM and the Congress Legislature Party should endorse it. It is a simple democratic process and nothing more than that.”

“We are all united and working together. There is absolutely nothing wrong with hosting dinners. The agenda is very clear, the meeting is about the Belagavi convention scheduled on January 21. It’s going to be a grand function,” he stated.

Despite the leaders saying that things are under control, sources said that all is not well within the Congress party. The struggle for power has begun and is likely to escalate in the coming days.

–IANS

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Cultural Intolerance On Stolen Land: Crowell’s Remarks About Indian Wedding Highlights Canada’s Hypocrisy

Racism, Colonialism, And Canada's Multicultural Paradox: A Deeper Look

The recent controversy sparked by Sadie Crowell’s derogatory comments about an Indian wedding in Canada has reignited debates around cultural intolerance, systemic racism, and the essence of multiculturalism in Canadian society. Beyond the immediate controversy, this incident presents an opportunity to reflect on Canada’s deeper historical context as an occupied territory and the cultural parallels between Indigenous communities and immigrant traditions, particularly Indian culture.

Canada: An Occupied Territory

Canada, as it stands today, is a nation built on lands that historically belonged to Indigenous tribes. Before European colonisation, the First Nations, Métis, and Inuit peoples lived across these lands for thousands of years. The arrival of European settlers brought displacement, cultural erasure, and marginalization of Indigenous communities. Treaties were often violated or manipulated, and Indigenous peoples were forced onto reserves, their land and resources exploited in the name of progress. To this day, many Indigenous communities face systemic disadvantages, including poverty, inadequate healthcare, and lack of access to clean drinking water.

The irony of a Canadian citizen criticizing a cultural celebration such as an Indian wedding becomes stark when one considers that the very land on which she lives was forcibly taken from its original stewards. Indigenous cultures are deeply rooted in communal celebrations, music, dance, and rituals that resemble Indian traditions. Yet, Indigenous expressions of culture were suppressed under colonial rule, much like the racism and intolerance faced by immigrant communities today.

Cultural Parallels: Indigenous And Indian Traditions

Both Indigenous and Indian cultures share a profound connection to communal living, respect for nature, and vibrant celebratory practices. Traditional Indigenous powwows, for instance, involve music, drumming, and dancing, which are central to their community’s identity and spirituality. Similarly, Indian weddings are a reflection of familial bonds, spirituality, and joy, often expressed through music, dance, and rituals.

Both cultures value community over individuality, which can be misinterpreted as disruptive or noisy in Western societies. This misunderstanding stems from a Eurocentric worldview that prioritizes silence and individualism, often at the expense of community cohesion and cultural expression. The Indian wedding that Crowell criticized is not just a social event but a deeply spiritual and cultural milestone, much like many Indigenous ceremonies that were historically banned or stigmatized by colonial authorities.

Multiculturalism Under Scrutiny

Canada prides itself on being a multicultural society, yet incidents like this reveal the fragility of that ideal. For multiculturalism to thrive, it must go beyond tolerance to embrace genuine acceptance and respect for diverse traditions. Crowell’s comments and the support they received highlight a troubling trend of xenophobia disguised as concerns about noise or disruption. These attitudes ignore the contributions of immigrants to Canada’s social, cultural, and economic fabric while perpetuating a narrative of “otherness.”

The criticism of Indian weddings—or any cultural practice—must be contextualized within Canada’s colonial history. The land belongs to Indigenous peoples, whose traditions were once seen as disruptive and uncivilized by colonizers. Today, similar labels are applied to immigrant communities, exposing a cyclical pattern of marginalization. Instead of perpetuating division and racism, Canada has an opportunity to foster a society that celebrates cultural diversity as a strength, rather than a source of conflict.

Incidents like this should serve as a wake-up call for Canadians to educate themselves about the histories and contributions of both Indigenous peoples and immigrant communities. Recognizing Canada as an occupied territory should inspire greater empathy for those who bring their traditions to these lands. By embracing the shared values of community, spirituality, and celebration found in both Indigenous and immigrant cultures, Canada can truly live up to its multicultural promise.

It is only by addressing these underlying issues—the legacy of colonialism, systemic racism, and cultural intolerance—that Canada can move towards a more inclusive and harmonious society. The conversation must shift from division to understanding, from exclusion to celebration, and from ignorance to respect.

Ganesh Kumar is a geo-political analyst.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Omar Abdullah Praises PM Modi, “Statehood Will Be Restored At The Right Time” Says PM Modi

Omar Abdullah Praises PM Modi, Statehood Will Be Restored At The Right Time, Says PM Modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi said on Monday that Kashmir is the country’s crown, and he desires that this crown shine better and become more glorious in the days to come.

The Prime Minister said this after inaugurating and dedicating the Sonamarg tunnel to the nation. PM Modi started his speech by lauding the hard work of the workers who made the Sonamarg tunnel possible and were not deterred from making the supreme sacrifice. He offered tribute to civilian workers who laid down their lives during the construction of the tunnel he inaugurated.

He said despite the grave danger to their lives, no worker wanted to go home after the terrorists attacked the Gagangir workers camp.

“Nobody wanted to go home even after we lost seven friends to terrorism. My tribute to those martyrs who gave their lives for the country.”

“Kashmir is the crown of India and it is my desire that this crown should become more shining and glorious. In this endeavour, the people of Jammu and Kashmir are helping me. I assure you that any roadblock in the way of realising your dreams will be removed,” the PM assured the people.

He said two days back Chief Minister Omar Abdullah had uploaded some pictures and videos around the tunnel. By seeing those, my eagerness to be here increased.

“When I worked here as a BJP worker, I have spent a lot of time in Sonamarg, Gulmarg, Ganderbal and Baramulla. It used to snow heavily even in those days. But, the warmth of the people of J&K did not make you feel the cold. Today is a great day, crores of people are taking part in the Maha Kumbh in Uttar Pradesh. Lohri is being celebrated in Punjab. This is the period of the 40-day intense cold of ‘Chillai Kalan’, which people face with a smile in Kashmir. People are coming to Sonamarg from different parts of the country and enjoy your hospitality,” said PM Modi.

“I recently inaugurated the Jammu rail division. Today I have dedicated Sonamarg tunnel to the country and the people of J&K and Ladakh,” he said.

Referring to Omar Abdullah’s demand for statehood, PM Modi said, “Modi always fulfils his promise. Every promise will be fulfilled at the right time. Every decision has a proper time when it is taken,” the PM said. “This tunnel was started by us, and it is my decision that whatever work we start we must also inaugurate. Sonamarg and the entire area here will get a great boost. In days to come, road and railway projects will be completed. The Valley will soon be connected through railways. New roads, colleges, etc., it will be a ‘Naya Kashmir’ that we have been speaking about,” said the PM.

“In 2040, India will be a developed nation and no family, no area of the country will be left out in that developed India. In the last 10 years, over four crore poor people got concrete houses. In days to come, three crore more people will get new homes. Free healthcare given in the country is beneficial to the people of J&K as well. New IITs, AIIMS, educational institutions, polytechnics, etc., are being opened. Today you have a good road from J&K to Arunachal Pradesh. The world’s highest tunnel, highest railway bridge, and highest cable bridge are also being built in J&K. Ropeways to Shankaracharya temple, and ropeways to other places will be completed in J&K. These projects will make J&K the most connected place in the country. Through better connectivity, hitherto unexplored tourist destinations will be opened up.,” the PM said in his address.

“Peace in J&K has given great dividends. Over two crore tourists came to J&K in 2024. Everybody connected with tourism has benefitted. Our Kashmir is regaining its glory of being the paradise on earth. People go to enjoy ice cream in Lal Chowk in the evening. Polo View market has become a hub of modern activity. People go with families to cinemas. The situation could out have improved without the participation of the people, no government could have done it without the people’s support. There was an international marathon in Srinagar in which the chief minister also participated. I greeted him for that when he met me in Delhi. After 40 years, international cricket was held in Srinagar. We saw car racing in Srinagar. Gulmarg will host the 5th Khelo India Winter Games in Gulmarg next month,” PM Modi said.

He said that there are greater and better avenues being thrown open for the youth of the union territory. The local youth will not need to go out for better education in the days to come. The PM said that the J&K bank has crossed Rs 2.30 lakh crore business and this has increased the lending capacity of the bank.

“The dark past of J&K has now changed into the future of prosperity and progress,” the PM said. Before the PM’s address, Union Minister for Road Transport and Highways Nitin Gadkari addressed the public rally. He said to make a self-reliant India, we have to ensure road connectivity and infrastructure development.

“US President John F Kennedy said that American roads are good not because America is rich, but America is rich because American roads are good. After completing the 6.4 km long Rs 2,700 crore Sonamarg tunnel, we are also completing the Rs 6,800 crore Zojila tunnel. Ladakh will have all-season connectivity after the Zojila tunnel is completed,” Gadkari said.

He also referred to various corridors being made in J&K and gave details of projects completed in the UT. He spoke of ring roads in Valley and Jammu division. The Minister said the distance from Delhi to Srinagar will be completed in 7 to 8 hours within one year. “This will, Hon’ble PM, realise your promise of cutting the distance between Dili and Srinagar,” he said.

Lt Governor Manoj Sinha paid tribute to seven civilians, who were killed by terrorists on October 20 last year in Gagangir. “Hon’ble PM you have realised the dreams depicted in textbooks by restoring the peace and dignity of the people in J&K. This place is no longer known for terrorism, but for tourism now. By giving reservations to underprivileged classes you have ensured equitable progress and opportunities to the people of J&K. Today, you have inaugurated and dedicated the Rs 2,700 crore tunnel. This tunnel will be the line of good luck and fortune on the hand of J&K. Connectivity to Ladakh will also become a reality in 2026,” he said.

“Projects over Rs 1.50 lakh crore of roads and infrastructure are currently being completed in J&K. 99 per cent villages of the UT have road connectivity now. Soon the dream of national integration from Kashmir to Kanyakumari will be realised through Udhampur-Srinagar-Baramulla Rail Link. For realising the dreams of every citizen of J&K, I thank you Hon’ble Prime Minister from the depth of my heart,” the Lt Governor said.

Chief Minister Omar Abdullah delivered the welcome address. He paid tribute to seven civilians killed by terrorists in the Gagangir area on October 20. He also mentioned people killed during the last 35 years by terrorists, including leaders and workers of his party, the National Conference (NC).

“Your August presence, Hon’ble Prime Minister, is proof that we will not allow forces inimical to the unity and integrity of the country to succeed,” the CM said.

He said people waited for long years for the Sonamarg tunnel and the people living in otherwise cut-off Sonamarg will not have to abandon their homes during the winter months now. The CM lauded the Prime Minister’s efforts to ensure peace on the borders in J&K. He said the PM’s mission of ending ‘Dil Ki Doori, Aur Dili Se Doori’ is being proved through the PM’s efforts. He praised the PM for ensuring peaceful, fair elections in J&K. He hoped the PM would soon ensure statehood for J&K so that the UT gets its rightful place in the union of Indian states.

–IANS

Subscribe to our TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram channels and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

The Dark Legacy Of British Trade: Opium, Tea, And The Economic Ruin Of India

The Dark Legacy Of British Trade: Opium, Tea, And The Economic Ruin Of India

The British Empire, at its zenith, was the largest in history, and it played a significant role in shaping the modern world. One of the ways the British Empire expanded its influence was through the exploitation of global trade. The British used their power to buy valuable commodities from other countries, often at the expense of the local populations. This article delves into the exploitation of global trade by the British Empire, focusing on their acquisition of tea from China and their exploitation of India’s resources and labour.

The British Tea Heist From China

One of the most significant stories of British exploitation was their acquisition of tea from China. Initially, tea was a luxury item in Britain, introduced by Portuguese and Dutch traders in the 1600s. By the early 1700s, the British East India Company began importing tea directly from China. Tea was heavily taxed, making it expensive, and thus, it was primarily consumed by the wealthy. However, by the mid-1700s, tea had become immensely popular across all levels of British society.

The burgeoning demand for tea created a trade imbalance between Britain and China. The Chinese needed payment in silver for their tea, which drained British silver reserves. To address this imbalance, the British East India Company started growing and processing opium in Bengal, India, to smuggle it into China illegally. This led to massive addiction problems in China, which significantly weakened the Chinese economy and society.

The Chinese government’s efforts to suppress the opium trade culminated in the First Opium War (1839-1842). Britain’s victory in this war forced China to cede Hong Kong to the British, open five ports to foreign trade, and relax restrictions on foreign access to inland China, which considerably affected China’s economy. The Second Opium War (1856-1860) further solidified British control, allowing even greater exploitation.

Corporate Espionage And Tea Cultivation In India

To further their tea interests, the British engaged in a bold act of corporate espionage. In 1848, botanist Robert Fortune disguised himself and ventured into China’s interior, then forbidden to foreigners, to steal the secrets of tea horticulture and manufacturing. By smuggling tea plants and seeds out of China, the British were able to set up a thriving tea industry in India, particularly in Assam and Darjeeling. This move reduced their dependency on Chinese tea and allowed them to dominate the tea market.

India, often referred to as the “jewel in the crown” of the British Empire, was subjected to extensive exploitation of its resources and labour. The colonial exploitation of India had far-reaching effects on the country’s economy and society.

The British enforced trade policies that transformed India into an exporter of primary products like raw materials and foodstuffs while turning it into an importer of British manufactured goods. This caused a significant drain of wealth from India to Britain. Indian raw materials like cotton, indigo, and jute were exported to Britain, where they were processed into finished goods and then sold back to India at unaffordable prices.

The “wealth drain” theory, popularized by Indian nationalists like Dadabhai Naoroji, highlighted how colonial policies led to a continuous outflow of wealth from India to Britain. This was achieved through various mechanisms, including taxation, trade imbalances, and the requirement that India pay for the expenses of the British administration and military.

British capital invested in India was aimed at maximizing profits through malpractices. The colonial administration redirected a major part of the profits to Britain in the form of dividends and other charges, burdening the Indian economy. Railways, plantations, and other infrastructure projects ostensibly helped India, but they were primarily focused on serving British economic interests.

Agricultural Transformation And Exploitation

The British focused on maximizing revenue through various land revenue systems, such as the Permanent Settlement, Ryotwari, and Mahalwari systems. These policies led to the commercialization of agriculture and the exploitation of Indian peasants.

Permanent Settlement (1793): Introduced in Bengal, this system fixed land revenue permanently and made zamindars (landowners) responsible for collecting it. This led to a rigid and oppressive system where peasants were often exploited by zamindars.

Ryotwari System: Implemented in parts of South India, this system made individual peasants (ryots) solely responsible for land revenue payments to the government. While it cut the mediators, it also subjected peasants to heavy taxation.

Mahalwari System: Introduced in parts of North India, this system involved revenue collection through village communities or estates (mahals). Although it aimed at collective responsibility, it often led to the exploitation of peasants by village heads.

The British policies transformed Indian agriculture into a cash crop economy, focusing on the production of crops like indigo, opium, and cotton, often at the expense of subsistence farming. This caused widespread poverty, agricultural decline, and recurring famines, such as the Bengal Famine of 1770 and the Great Famine of 1876-78.

Deindustrialization And Impact On Traditional Industries

The British policies led to deindustrialization in India, turning the country into a raw material supplier and a market for British industrial goods. Traditional industries in India, especially textiles, suffered enormously due to competition from British manufactured goods.

Textile Industry: India had a thriving textile industry before British colonization. The British disrupted this industry by flooding the Indian market with cheaper, machine-made textiles from Britain. This led to the decline of India’s handloom weaving industry and caused economic hardship for millions of artisans and weavers.

Craft Industries: Other traditional craft industries, such as metalwork, pottery, and woodworking, also faced decline due to the influx of British goods and the focus on raw material exports.

Labor Exploitation And Social Impact

Indian labourers and artisans faced harsh conditions, low wages, and bonded labour imposed by the British. Native craftsmen were forced to sell their goods at prices decided by British agents, worsening their plight. The British also implemented systems of indentured labour, where Indian labourers were sent to work on plantations in British colonies like the Caribbean, Fiji, and Mauritius under harsh conditions.

India had to cover the costs of British administration, military expenditures, and wars conducted by the British Government. These expenses, referred to as “Home Charges,” added a significant financial burden on India’s economy. Various estimates suggest that a substantial part of India’s revenue was diverted to Britain for these purposes, further draining the resources of the Indian subcontinent.

The prolonged exploitation by the British had severe economic and social impacts on India. The wealth drain, deindustrialization, and commercialization of agriculture led to widespread poverty, recurring famines, and a stagnant economy. The traditional industries declined, and the social fabric of the country was disrupted, creating a legacy of economic disparity that affected India’s development for decades.
The exploitation also fostered resentment and resistance among the Indian population, leading to movements for independence. The Indian National Congress, formed in 1885, became a pivotal organization in the struggle for India’s freedom, culminating in India’s independence in 1947.

The British Empire exploited global trade for centuries through strategic trade policies, military conquests, and resource extraction. Their actions in China and India exemplified the extent of their exploitation, leaving a lasting impact on global trade and the economies of the colonized nations. The opium trade, tea heist, and colonial policies in India were central to their imperial success, enriching Britain at the expense of other societies. The legacy of this exploitation is still a topic of historical and contemporary significance, reminding us of the far-reaching impacts of colonialism and the importance of fair and just trade practices in the modern world.

Ganesh Kumar is a geo-political analyst.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Former Justice AK Rajan Joins Dravidar Kazhagam’s Seminar Against UGC’s NEP Grading System

Former Justice AK Rajan Joins Dravidar Kazhagam's Seminar Against UGC's NEP Grading System

Former Madras High Court Justice A.K. Rajan, who previously led a committee to abolish the NEET exam, has stirred controversy once again with his opposition to the University Grants Commission’s (UGC) proposed framework for grading Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) based on their implementation of the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020. This development comes amid growing resistance from several states, including Tamil Nadu and Karnataka, that have not adopted the NEP.

The UGC’s draft notification, issued on 3 January 2025, proposes a two-step evaluation process for HEIs, focusing on the implementation of the NEP as a key criterion for awarding privileges and entitlements under various UGC regulations. However, universities in states like Tamil Nadu, where the NEP’s four-year integrated degree programs are not recognized, have expressed concerns that their students may be at a disadvantage, particularly in government job opportunities due to the non-equivalence of their degrees.

Vice-chancellors from various universities have raised concerns about the fairness of the proposed grading system for Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). S. Vaidhyasubramaniam, Vice-Chancellor of SASTRA Deemed University, argued that grading based solely on NEP implementation would disadvantage HEIs in non-NEP states. He suggested using existing frameworks like NIRF or NAAC for grading, with a gradual shift to NEP-based criteria once all states adopt the policy.

A key issue is the emphasis on the Common University Entrance Test (CUET), which some universities in non-NEP states, like Karnataka, see as problematic. Prof. Niranjana of Bengaluru North University warned that universities in non-NEP states would score poorly under the new system, risking a loss of central funding, which would harm students.

The draft also highlights foreign collaborations, raising concerns that smaller or regional institutions without international partnerships would be penalized in rankings. Paul Newman, Principal of St. Joseph’s Evening College, argued that states like Kerala, Tamil Nadu, and West Bengal, which have not adopted the NEP, could suffer as a result. He emphasized that education is a state subject, and urged the UGC to base rankings on NAAC assessments instead of NEP implementation.

The UGC has opened a 30-day window for public feedback on the draft notification, but the mounting opposition signals a larger clash between centralized education policies and state autonomy. Critics warn that the grading framework, if implemented without modification, could exacerbate inequities, marginalizing institutions in non-NEP states and smaller HEIs without international exposure.

On 11 January 2025, Dravidar Kazhagam hosted a conclave titled “Education Policy Seminar Against National Education Policy Imposed by UGC,” in response to the UGC’s new draft. The event was led by K. Veeramani, President of Dravidar Kazhagam, with former Madras High Court Justice AK Rajan also participating. This move has drawn significant criticism from netizens, especially given Rajan’s previous involvement in drafting a report for the ruling DMK that called for the abolition of NEET, a recommendation that many believed contradicted factual evidence. His participation in the current seminar has sparked further debate.

Who Is A.K. Rajan?
A former Justice of the Madras High Court, A.K. Rajan was appointed to lead a committee by the Tamil Nadu government to examine the impact of the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) on medical college admissions in the state. The committee’s report, submitted to Chief Minister MK Stalin on 14 September 2024, argues for the abolition of NEET, claiming that it disadvantages rural government school students, particularly those studying in Tamil medium. However, the report has drawn criticism for its lack of objectivity, with many accusing it of being politically motivated to support the DMK government’s stance against NEET.

The committee’s findings are seen as biased and lacking substantiated evidence. Critics argue that the report selectively uses data and omits important facts to back the DMK’s political narrative, rather than offering a fair, unbiased analysis.

Claim: NEET Disadvantages Government School Students
Fact: The claim that NEET disadvantages government school students is contradicted by data showing significant improvement in medical college admissions for these students. After the introduction of a 7.5% reservation for government school students by the previous AIADMK government in 2020, a record 336 students secured MBBS seats, the highest in over a decade. From 2014-2017, only 108 government school students gained medical admissions. Additionally, the report fails to mention the number of government school students admitted to medical colleges before 2014, a period when medical admissions were already limited for these students due to the outdated ‘Samacheer Kalvi’ syllabus, which hindered critical thinking and analytical skills.

Before NEET, from 2007 to 2016, only 314 government school students made it into government medical colleges, with 62 students securing seats in the best year (2007) and as few as 18 in the worst (2013). This historical data suggests that the government school admission process was never truly advantageous to these students, even before NEET was implemented.

Claim: NEET Disadvantages Tamil Medium Students
Fact: Data in the report shows a consistent decline in the number of Tamil medium students taking the science stream, coupled with an increase in English medium students. This trend is not due to NEET but reflects a broader shift in the education system towards English medium, driven by demand from parents across rural and urban areas. While the number of Tamil medium students admitted to medical colleges has declined, this is largely due to fewer Tamil medium students opting for the science stream, not because of NEET.

It’s also important to note that Tamil Nadu’s government is itself promoting English medium education in schools, aiming to attract more students. With the 7.5% reservation for Tamil medium students, 299 students secured medical admissions in 2020-21, highlighting that Tamil medium students still have a fair chance under NEET, particularly with increasing access to the exam in Tamil and other languages.

Claim: NEET Favors CBSE Students
Fact: The report suggests that NEET favors CBSE students, but the data contradicts this claim. Before NEET, CBSE students had very low representation in Tamil Nadu’s medical colleges. It is only after NEET’s introduction that CBSE students have had a more equal opportunity to compete with their state board counterparts. Despite this, state board students still account for the majority of seats, as evidenced by the data in the report.

The committee’s claim that CBSE students are disproportionately favored seems to ignore the underlying reasons for the disparities between state and CBSE students. The substandard ‘Samacheer Kalvi’ syllabus, introduced by the DMK, left many Tamil Nadu state board students ill-prepared for NEET’s critical thinking and problem-solving demands, whereas the CBSE syllabus better aligned with the exam’s requirements.

Claim: NEET Favors Urban Students
Fact: The previous education system, before NEET, largely benefited wealthy students attending private schools in districts like Erode and Namakkal, where coaching centers that charged exorbitant fees prepared students for medical exams. These schools taught only the Class 12 syllabus, skipping Class 11, which resulted in an unfair advantage for students from affluent backgrounds. With NEET, the playing field was leveled, and students from rural and government schools now have a better chance at medical admissions.

The claim that NEET favors urban students appears to confuse the issue, as the data shows that the bulk of medical seats were taken by students from these wealthy private institutions prior to NEET’s introduction, not by rural government school students.

Other Issues with the Report
Former Vice Chancellor of Anna University, Prof. E. Balagurusamy, criticized the AK Rajan Committee’s report, calling it unbalanced and filled with misleading statistics. He noted that the report referred to irrelevant court cases and constitutional provisions that had no bearing on NEET’s impact. The report also made unfounded claims, such as the assertion that 99% of NEET students received coaching, without providing any evidence to support this figure. Furthermore, the report’s dire predictions about the healthcare system in Tamil Nadu, suggesting that NEET could lead to a shortage of doctors in rural areas, were seen as alarmist and lacking any factual basis.

The overall tone of the report seemed politically driven, with the outcome already determined before the study was conducted. Critics argue that the report was designed to support the DMK’s longstanding opposition to NEET, rather than offering a fair and objective assessment of the policy’s effects.

Subscribe to our TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram channels and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Kanchipuram Residents Frustrated As Waqf Board Allegedly Claims Over 2.43 Acres Of Land They’ve Lived On For Decades

In a troubling development in Tamil Nadu, residents of Min Nagar in Kanchipuram district are expressing their frustration over a recent claim by the Tamil Nadu Waqf Board regarding 2.43 acres of land where Hindus have been living for over 40 years. The Kanchipuram Registrar’s Office has stated that the land belongs to the Waqf Board, leading to difficulties for the residents in registering their properties.

The land in question was originally purchased in 1982 by employees of the Kanchipuram Electric City Office, who acquired 6.13 acres in Konerikuppam, near the Kanchipuram Corporation. Over time, these residents built homes and settled there.

The issue specifically revolves around Survey No. 82, one of four survey numbers (82, 83/2, 85, and 89/2), where the residents are now facing obstacles in registering their deeds for the 2.43 acres. Shanthibai, one of the residents, attempted to sell her house at the Kanchipuram Registrar’s Office in October 2024 but was told that the Waqf Board claimed ownership of over 40 residential plots in Survey No. 82. The Registrar’s office informed her that she would need to obtain a no-objection certificate from the Waqf Board before proceeding with the sale.

Similarly, D. Munseeb from Min Nagar, who wanted to divide his property between his children, was also denied registration due to the land being labeled as Waqf Board property.

Srinivasan, the secretary of the Min Nagar Welfare Association, explained that the 2.43-acre plot in Survey No. 82 had originally been owned by Kanniyappan in 1944. The property was later auctioned by the Revenue Department to Vitobhasha, from whom the residents, mostly Hindus, purchased it as residential plots in 1982. The Revenue Department issued them pattas, and they have been paying property taxes ever since. Srinivasan emphasized that the Waqf Board’s objection is without documentation, and the Land Registry Department has previously confirmed that there were no encroachments on the land between 1967 and 1981.

He further called on the Waqf Board to provide any relevant documents to support its claim to the land. He also mentioned that more than 40 families are affected by this issue and that the residents have lodged complaints with the Collector, the District Registrar, and the Chief Minister’s Special Division, urging the government to intervene and resolve the matter.

A.T. Kandasamy, another resident of Min Nagar, shared his distress, recounting how he was informed by the Sub-Registrar’s office that his land could not be sold because it was allegedly owned by the Waqf Board. He expressed disbelief, asking how land where Hindus have lived for years could belong to the Waqf Board. Kandasamy, who had hoped to sell his house to cover wedding expenses, called the situation a source of great distress, as he is unable to sell the property due to the claim. He appealed to the government to take action and clarify the ownership of the land.

(With inputs from Dinamalar)

Subscribe to our TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram channels and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

200-Year-Old Idols Uncovered At The Shores Of Thiruchendur

200-Year-Old Idols Uncovered At The Shores Of Thiruchendur

A remarkable discovery has been made on the shores of Thiruchendur, where the relentless waves of the sea have revealed historical treasures buried deep in the sand. Among the findings, an ancient sage’s statue, dating back over 200 years, has come to light, thrilling devotees and drawing their spiritual admiration.

The treasures, hidden for centuries beneath the sand, have added to the mystique of the region, where the sea’s continuous erosion exposes relics of immense historical and religious significance. This particular statue, believed to be of a revered sage, is stirring deep feelings of devotion among the people. As news of the discovery spread, the fervor surrounding the event reached its peak, and it has now become a source of intense devotion among the locals and visitors alike.

Idols Emerged In 2024

In 2024, two significant discoveries were made on the shores of Thiruchendur beach, both shedding light on the region’s rich historical and spiritual heritage. In October 2024, a statue of Karuppasamy, an important deity in Hindu tradition, was found after being brought back to shore by strong waves. This idol, which had likely been submerged in the sea during an Ashtabandana Mahakumbabhishekam ritual performed at the Thiruchendur Murugan Temple, was rediscovered as the waves receded.

Additionally, two stone inscriptions, both approximately 20 years old, were uncovered near the Thiruchendur Murugan temple in December 2024. As the water levels along the beach dropped due to a cyclone, the inscriptions—written in the latest Tamil scriptwere revealed. They were likely installed around 50 years ago to mark the presence of Theertha Kinaru (holy wells) used by devotees. The first inscription detailed a sacred water ritual calledMatha Theertham,promising spiritual rewards, while the second referred toPitha Theertham.These stones were originally placed near wells, though most of the 24 wells along the beach are now closed due to high waves. Unfortunately, one of the inscriptions was damaged due to the lack of proper retrieval efforts by the temple administration.

This discovery not only unravels a piece of the past but also strengthens the bond between the people and their sacred traditions, underlining the spiritual significance of the place. The unfolding of these historical finds continues to capture the imagination of the devotees, further reinforcing Thiruchendur’s place as a significant cultural and spiritual hub.

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“People Should Know Who Is That ‘MaSu’ (Polluted) Sir?” – BJP Leader H. Raja Slams DMK Govt For Law And Order Deterioration, Questions DMK’s Alleged Links In Anna University Sexual Assault Case

BJP Leader H. Raja Slams DMK Govt For Law And Order Deterioration, Questions DMK's Alleged Links In Anna University Sexual Assault Case

Senior BJP leader H. Raja has strongly criticized the ruling DMK government and its ministers for allowing the law-and-order situation in Tamil Nadu to deteriorate significantly. He also condemned the rise in crimes against women, alleging that many of these crimes involve DMK functionaries. Raja raised questions about the unknown person connected to the Anna University sexual harassment case and questioned, ‘Who is that “MaSu” (polluted) sir?‘ Additionally, he expressed support for Naam Tamilar Katchi (NTK) leader Seeman’s sharp criticism of Dravidian ideologue E.V. Ramasamy Naicker who is fondly called as Periyar by his followers, endorsing Seeman’s statements and offering help on related matters.

Speaking to the press in Mayiladuthurai, H. Raja emphasized that Tamil Nadu is increasingly becoming a place where women are unsafe. He referenced the case of an alleged DMK functionary, Gnanasekaran, who was arrested for sexually harassing a student at Anna University. Despite his involvement in organizing a major DMK event, Raja noted that the Law Minister swiftly distanced the party from him. Raja further accused the Tamil Nadu police of being misused by the state government and criticized Chennai Police Commissioner Arun for behaving as if he were a member of the DMK, raising concerns about his neutrality.

H. Raja stated, “The Commissioner is acting beyond his authority, behaving like an unauthorized member of the DMK, which has raised many suspicions. What does the woman’s FIR state? It says tha when hile Gnanasekaran was with me, he spoke to someone on the phone. Not only did he speak but also persuaded me to act according to what ‘sir’ says. What I am asking now is for the people to know—who is that ‘MaSu’ Sir? This needs to be revealed.”

Raja also called attention to the lack of action by the police in cases involving DMK officials, such as one where a DMK district administrator named Bharathi raja allegedly took explicit photographs of a woman working as a nurse in government hospital and blackmailed her. He cited several other violent crimes against women, including a rape and murder case in Kallakurichi and the rape and murder of a 10-year-old girl in Chennai. Despite a High Court order for a CBI investigation, Raja noted that the state government had appealed against this decision. He accused the DMK of using its influence to protect its party members from justice.

Raja also criticized the DMK’s claim of being a civilized party, pointing to controversial statements made by certain DMK figures, such as the remark about tearing apart the governor’s trouser. He demanded that such individuals be removed from the party if the DMK truly stood for civility. He went further to accuse the DMK of being anti-national, claiming that its refusal to follow constitutional protocols, such as singing the national anthem at government functions, demonstrated its unpatriotic stance.

In his remarks, Raja also brought up EVR’s legacy, calling him a traitor to society and an anti-national. He referred to various controversial actions and statements attributed to EVR, including his denouncement of India’s independence and his supposed derogatory behavior toward women. Raja criticized Seeman’s views but defended his right to express them, emphasizing that others, including historical figures like EVR, had made far worse statements. He also alluded to efforts to suppress information about EVR’s actions, including the burning of the Connemara Library, which he claimed was done to erase evidence of EVR’s controversial activities.

Raja concluded by asserting that Seeman’s criticisms of EVR were justified, citing historical examples of EVR’s anti-national behavior, and accusing individuals like Dravidianist actor Sathyaraj, who had associated with both EVR and the DMK, of hypocrisy.

Subscribe to our TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram channels and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.