Home Blog Page 412

‘Thiruparankundram Hill Belongs To Us, We Have The Right To It’, Say Residents & Blame Islamists For Religious Tensions

After the Hindu Munnani announced plans to protest over the Thiruparankundram Hill issue, Section 144 prohibitory orders were enforced in Madurai starting 3 January 2025. The region has experienced rising religious tensions, fueled by claims from Muslim fundamentalist groups asserting their right to sacrifice animals on the hilltop. Additionally, Ramanathapuram IUML MP Navaskani has claimed that the dargah belongs to the Tamil Nadu Waqf Board. Some extremists even went as far as painting the Jain cave on the hill with green paint to assert their control, which many see as an attempt to undermine the sanctity and uniqueness of the site.

With the Madurai Collector imposing Section 144 prohibitory orders on the eve of the Hindu Munnani protest, denying permission for the demonstration while allowing Muslim factions and fundamentalist parties like the SDPI and IUML to continue their actions, tensions remained high as the Hindu Munnani was not granted permission to protest till the last minute. The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court granted conditional permission for the protests and a huge number of people gathered at the prescribed location demanding answers and protesting against the DMK government.

What Residents Say?

One of the residents, Ravi, said that the area had been peaceful with religious harmony until factions like the SDPI intervened and created unrest in the locality. “People come from all over India, and some even travel from Kasi to worship at Thiruparankundram the first abode of Lord Muruga. It is the first abode among the six sacred abodes, and people visit daily. Another unique aspect of Thiruparankundram is that the Murugan here is associated with marriage, so there is a large crowd during Muhurthams (auspicious days). For more than 50 generations, the Kasi Vishwanathar temple has been located atop the Thiruparankundram hills.”

Ravi continued, “Hindus and Muslims living here have always maintained unity. For example, during Ramadan, the Muslim shares biryani, and during festivals like Diwali, Pongal, and Tamil New Year, we share ours with them. However, certain factions like SDPI have caused problems. The local Muslim community has not caused any trouble; they live in harmony with us.”

He added, “We believe the problems are being caused by outsiders who may have been influenced by these factions. This is Kandha Hills, and Thiruparankundram is the first abode of the six sacred abodes. We see the High Court’s intervention as a victory for our community.'”

Another resident said, “I want to make it clear that there is no discrimination in this locality. Everyone lives in cooperation with one another. However, due to some political interference, this situation has turned bad. There is no need for politics here; unity is what brings us prosperity.” He emphasized that no locals were involved in the unrest, but rather some fundamentalist groups. He also advised the local Muslim community not to follow these extremists, as doing so would be a victory for them. Additionally, he pointed out that the town’s main source of revenue comes from the Murugan temple, which sustains local businesses and shops.

Another resident Murugesan said, “There has never been an issue between Hindus and Muslims in this town. Everyone is equal, and we give each other respect. In the Santhana Koodu event, it is customary for Muslims to show respect to Hindus. However, in recent days, the unity among them has deteriorated. There are five factions of Muslims at the dargah in the hills, which belongs to them. The Union Jamath interferes whenever a problem arises between these factions, and their involvement disrupts the harmonious relationship in the locality. We don’t know what their motives are, but they claim that by raising this issue, they want to encroach on the hills. I want to ask one thing: For Hindus, the Murugan temple is the first abode among the six sacred places. So, who is older—the Hindu deity Murugan or Sikkandar Badusah, who died and was buried 200 years ago? Which history is more ancient? If you consider it truthfully, it belongs to the Hindus. We cannot deny that he has been dead and buried, and even if we consider it to be 300 years, ours is more than 2,000 years old—this is our sacred place.” He added, “The Hindu-Muslim community, including those associated with the dargah, living with unity until today. However, the issue arose due to the interveners. The government should make a fair decision to reclaim what rightfully belongs to us. We have never asked for anything that belongs to them, nor have we demanded the vacating of the dargah. Let them continue as they are; we don’t mind. But the hills are ours, and we are not ready to give them up.” 

Another resident, Muthraja, revealed that there are no proper records for the dargah, not even for basic amenities like obtaining electricity from the local municipality. In contrast, only the Murugan temple has all the necessary records from 1930.

Another elderly woman resident, named Panjavarnam, said, “The Murugan temple belongs to us, and no one has any right over it. It has been ours for generations, and no one can claim ownership of it. They came here recently and are claiming it as theirs, but that’s not the case. They visit the hills once a year, but we, the seven clans, have been worshiping Murugan there, they are giving due respect to us, and they come here and claim it as theirs without any rights. It’s foolish for them to protest. The hills belong to us. I was born and raised in this town and have lived here for 75 years, even getting married here. We have no relationship with them, but we used to live together. The temple belongs to the seven clan guardians, from Pasumali to all seven directions of Thiruparankundram, and we have the right to it.”

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

How The 1931 Privy Council Ruling Settled Ownership Of Thirupparankundram Hill

Madurai’s Thirupparankundram Hill, home to the ancient Murugan Temple, has long been at the center of a legal and religious dispute. The recent protests owing to the encroachments by the Islamists and desecration acts by their ilk beg us to take a look at the landmark ruling in 1931 by the Privy Council in London. This ruling settled the question of ownership, affirming the temple’s rights over the hill while allowing a mosque to remain in its specific location.

What Are The Origins Of The Dispute?

The legal battle over Thirupparankundram Hill involved three main claims:

  1. The Temple’s Claim: The temple administration asserted ownership over almost the entire hill, except for a few cultivated lands and the mosque’s site.
  2. The Muslim Claim: Muslim petitioners claimed the area where their mosque stood, and an additional portion of the hill called Nellitope.
  3. The British Government’s Claim: The colonial administration argued that all unoccupied land on the hill belonged to the government, as it was considered waste land.”

The 1923 Court Ruling

The case was first heard in a Madurai court in 1923, which ruled mostly in favor of the temple. The court recognized that the temple had exercised control over the hill for centuries and officially granted it ownership of the land. However, it made two exceptions:

  • The mosque’s site, its flagpole, and its access steps.
  • The Nellitope area, which was allocated to the Muslim claimants.

The British government’s claim was entirely rejected.

The 1926 Madras High Court Appeal

The Muslim claimants appealed this ruling to the Madras High Court in 1926. However, instead of clarifying Hindu or Muslim rights over the land, the High Court took a different stance—it declared that the entire hill belonged to the government, dismissing the temple’s claim.

The Final Ruling: Privy Council Decision (1931)

The temple authorities challenged this decision in the Privy Council, the highest legal authority under British rule. After reviewing historical records, the council issued a landmark ruling in 1931, restoring the temple’s ownership rights. The key points of the ruling were:

  • The temple had existed for centuries, likely since the 13th century or earlier.
  • The entire hill was considered sacred and had been referred to in official documents as “Swamimalai” (God’s Hill).
  • The temple had exercised ownership for over 100 years, maintaining temple roads, repairing structures, and managing the land.
  • No historical evidence suggested that Muslim rulers had ever taken over the hill or disrupted temple activities.
  • The British government’s claim to “waste land” was invalid, as the land was in active use by the temple.

Final Verdict

The Privy Council overturned the Madras High Court ruling and reinstated the 1923 decision. It confirmed that:

  • The Murugan Temple legally owned Thirupparankundram Hill, except for the mosque’s designated area and the Nellitope land.
  • The mosque could continue to exist in its specific location, but the broader hill remained under temple control.

This ruling continues to be significant, as it established clear ownership rights over Thirupparankundram Hill. Any further disputes over the land must take this historic judgment into account. 

(With inputs from The Hindu)

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Skandar Malai Or ‘Sikandar Malai’: A Look At The Real History

Thirupparankundram witnessed a large-scale protest on 4 February 2025 under the leadership of Hindu Munnani, as tensions escalated over the historical and religious dispute concerning the hill known as Sri Skandar Malai or Sikandar Malai. Protesters gathered in significant numbers, voicing their opposition to what they claim is an attempt to alter the hill’s religious identity. The controversy, deeply rooted in history, has reignited debates over temple ownership, religious rights, and the role of historical judgments in defining the present.

Historical Background And Malik Kafur Invasion

Historical records trace the conflict back to the 13th century when the region was invaded by the Delhi Sultans. At the time, the Pandya dynasty was in decline, and Malik Kafur, a general of the Delhi Sultanate, launched a military campaign that led to the capture of Thirupparankundram. The region remained under the rule of the Sultans for nearly 50 years, with Sikandar being one of the last rulers of this period. However, his reign was brought to an end by the Vijayanagara Empire, which launched a decisive military expedition to reclaim the region, restoring Hindu rule and temple worship.

Today, the core claim being contested is that Sikandar’s tomb exists on the hill. Protesters argue that after the Vijayanagara Empire restored Hindu rule, there was no record of any such burial site. They view this as an attempt to rewrite history and assert control over a hill that has been a sacred Hindu site for centuries.

Legal Disputes And Ownership Controversy

The ownership of the hill has been the subject of legal disputes for over two centuries. The earliest documented case emerged in 1801, questioning whether the hill and temple fell under municipal authority or the Devasthanam (temple administration). The ruling at the time confirmed that the entire hill, including its temple streets, belonged to the Devasthanam and had always remained in its possession.

In 1920, a judge reaffirmed the 1801 judgment, explicitly stating that the Mughals, British, and other invaders had arrived only to loot and plunder, with no legitimate claims to the land.

The case provided crucial evidence that in 1920, a judge reconfirmed the 1801 judgment, which stated: “The entire hill, including its surrounding area, belongs to the Devasthanam and has always been under its possession and enjoyment.”

In 1931, the Privy Council ruled that Tirupparankundram Hill belonged to the Murugan Temple, except for the mosque site and Nellitope area. The temple had exercised ownership for over a century, maintaining roads, water supply, and structures. The British government’s claim was rejected, as the land was not “waste” but sacred to the temple. There was no evidence of Muslim rulers taking over the hill, though a mosque was built. The Madras High Court’s ruling was overturned, restoring the 1923 decision that upheld temple ownership while allowing the mosque to remain on its designated land.

Protesters argue that the temple’s original community, the Devendra Kula Vellalars, have been the rightful custodians of the site for generations. They question the stance of the DMK government and officials who claim to support Scheduled Caste (SC) and Scheduled Tribe (ST) communities yet allegedly fail to uphold their rights over this sacred site.

Emergence Of Dargah In 1905 And Karthigai Deepam Dispute

Another major point of contention is the construction of a dargah on the hill. According to a book published by Damayanthi Publications, written by Nagappa Nachiyappan, Thirupparankundram Temple Vearkottam. It states that: “In 1905, funds were collected from Muslims, and a person named Ilayangudi Meera Mukkai Deen Rawthar built a structure on the hill.”. Protesters question how such a structure suddenly appeared in 1905 and why historical records prior to that time make no mention of it.

Adding to the ongoing religious disputes, the Karthigai Deepam festival, a sacred Hindu tradition, has been restricted since 1912. A legal case filed that year resulted in a prohibition on Hindus lighting the ceremonial lamp at the peak of the hill. Since then, the deepam has been lit at an alternate location called Moksha Deepam, sparking anger among devotees who see this as a violation of their religious rights. Protesters demand that Hindus be allowed to restore their traditional practice of lighting the deepam at its original location.

Encroachments 

Another alarming revelation has surfaced regarding encroachments on the hill. The Thirupparankundram Temple Vearkottam book, published in 1981, stated that only two bodies—Sikandar’s and his minister Lukman Sharif’s—were buried at the site. However, recent reports indicate that at least eight additional burials have taken place, raising concerns over encroachment on temple land.

In recent weeks, tensions have further escalated due to the Sandanakoodu Festival (Sandalwood Festival) flag hoisting controversy. Traditionally, the festival flag has been hoisted for three days. However, protestors allege that there is now a demand for it to remain hoisted for seven days, 24/7. Most controversially, the demand includes tying the flag to the Kalathi Maram, the sacred tree of the Thirupparankundram Temple. Protesters argue that such an act is an outright violation of temple traditions and an infringement on Hindu religious rights.

Historical Warriors And Fight For The Hill

Thirupparankundram has long been a site of resistance, and history remembers warriors who fought to preserve its sanctity. One such figure is Kuttaiya Pillai, a 13th-century warrior who fiercely resisted Malik Kafur’s invasion. According to folklore, before his death, Kuttaiya Pillai tattooed a message on his arm, declaring that if the hill were taken from Hindus, his spirit would return to seek justice. Many devotees believe his presence continues to protect the temple from encroachments.

The controversy surrounding Skanda Malai versus Sikandar Malai is not just a question of historical interpretation—it is a battle over religious identity, legal ownership, and the right to preserve sacred traditions.

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“This Anti-Hindu Taliban Govt Will End”: BJP Leader H Raja Shreds DMK Govt To Pieces Over Thiruparankundram Murugan Temple Issue

After last-minute approvals and conditional permission for the massive protest to protect Thiruparankundram Hill led by Hindu Munnani, the protest saw large numbers of people gather and show support for the cause.

Several Hindu Munnani leaders and BJP members were arrested as a preventive measure on 4 February 2025 as BNS 163 or Section 144 was imposed for two days in the district.

Among the speakers who spoke at the protest were H Raja, BJP national secretary who launched a scathing attack on the DMK government in Tamil Nadu and shredded their facade into pieces.

He began his speech by saying, “They placed me on house arrest since this morning. They delayed by 40 minutes after the court order in an attempt to prevent me from coming here.”

He continued, “I tell the Taliban government led by MK Stalin in Tamil Nadu, the evil anti-Hindu government, this is what happened in Uttar Pradesh too. Due to this the enemies cannot come to power in Uttar Pradesh. The same will happen here too. I warn the anti-Hindu evil mob that is roaming around to divide Thiruparankundram, the first of the Arupadaiveedu/Abodes of Lord Muruga. Was it the Murugan temple or the dargah that came first in Thiruparankundram? Why is there a problem only now? No one should forget that whenever the DMK comes, there is an administration that is against the Hindu people. The anti-Hindu government and the police department must answer this question. As a precaution, we should record the words used by the police when they arrested us and file a police report against each of them in every district. Who can issue 144 order? Magistrate, executive magistrate, and collector. Madurai Collector has issued 144 prohibitory orders. How is this order valid for Chennai, Karaikudi, and Tiruppur? The authority of the District Collector is valid only within this Madurai district. If the police department is arresting us living outside the district and placing us under house arrest, it is against Article 21 of the Constitution – against the fundamental rights of a citizen. It is our duty to take these policemen to court. This must be a final lesson for them. Don’t touch Hindus. When you see Navaskani, your legs tremble, shameless gang. Navaskani’s henchmen are in power in Tamil Nadu.”

He added, “At least 5 lakh people would have gathered here for this protest. Thousands of members of Hindu organisations have been imprisoned. There was a Kashi Vishwanath temple on the Thiruparankundram hill even before Sikandar was born. I just had d darshan of the deity. Why did Sikandar go up the hill? No one is living up the hill. Today they say they are going to the dargah. There was no dargah then. Then why did they go? People say in the village that Sikandar went to the hill to demolish the Kashi Vishwanath temple. Is there a dargah for someone who went to demolish a Hindu temple? Government documents state that Sikandar’s grave is in Goripalayam.

If that is the case, isn’t the Dargah on Thiruparankundram Hill a fake? Isn’t it a plan to usurp the first abode of the six abodes of Lord Murugan? At this time, if we Hindus are not united, they will destroy our Tamil God Murugan. Who has the right to take over the first of the six abodes?”

Going back in history to cite an example, Raja said, “In India, in 1942, Muhammad Ali Jinnah put forward the demand for Pakistan. In 1944, a conference was held asking for partition. In that speech, Jinnah said ‘Either concede Pakistan or face civil war.’ At that time, our legal expert and father of the constitution, Bhimrao Ambedkar very clearly put forth his comments. He said, “Conceding Pakistan will not solve this threat to civil war.” Even if Pakistan is separated, the civil war will not end. That is what is continuing now. That is why today, Navas Kani is trying to incite the Hindus and went up the hill with a goat and a chicken. If this is not nipped in the bud, we will have a huge price to pay. In court, the government said that the ban was imposed so that it would not be like Ayodhya. This is the beginning. The Ayodhya war has started in Thiruparankundram, the first abode of Lord Murugan. In this struggle, we will end the Taliban government in Tamil Nadu. The 2026 elections have been marked as the auspicious time for that. Let us remain steadfast in this resolve. Let us show Hindu unity to the world,” H Raja concluded.

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

‘First Vote, Then Refreshment’: PM Modi Urges Young Voters To Cast Their Vote

Take Risks, Push Boundaries: PM Modi Cautions Youth Against Comfort Zone

As Delhi goes to the polls for the Assembly elections on Wednesday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi called on the city’s voters to actively participate in the democratic process and said ‘first vote, then refreshment’. Taking to the social media platform X, PM Modi encouraged Delhi’s voters to embrace their civic responsibility with enthusiasm.

“Voting for all the seats in the Delhi Assembly elections will be held today. I urge the voters here to participate in this festival of democracy with full enthusiasm and cast their valuable vote,” PM Modi wrote in a post. He also shared a special message for first-time voters, saying, “On this occasion, my special wishes to all the young friends who are going to vote for the first time. Remember – first vote, then refreshment!”

Echoing the Prime Minister’s sentiments, Union Home Minister Amit Shah also appealed to the people of Delhi to prioritise voting.

HM Shah urged voters to cast their ballots with the hope of a better future for the city, highlighting several key issues.

“I appeal to my sisters and brothers who are going to vote in the Delhi Assembly elections to vote against false promises, polluted Yamuna, liquor shops, broken roads and dirty water,” he wrote on X.

HM Shah emphasised the need for a government with a strong track record of public welfare and a clear vision for Delhi’s development.

He added, “Today, vote in large numbers to form a government that has a strong track record of public welfare and a clear vision for the development of Delhi. Your one vote can make Delhi the most developed capital of the world. Vote first, then have refreshments.”

The Delhi Assembly elections will determine the makeup of the Legislative Assembly for the coming term, with the results to be counted on February 8.

–IANS

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

US Foreign Policy Expert’s “JFK’s Forgotten Crisis” Reveals How Nehru Was More Interested In Mrs. Kennedy Than Mr. Kennedy

Prime Minister Narendra Modi on 4 February 2025 recommended a book for Lok Sabha MPs to read, adding an unexpected title to their reading list – ‘JFK’s Forgotten Crisis’ by US foreign policy expert Bruce Riedel.

The book delves into political and diplomatic emergencies during John F. Kennedy’s presidency. This suggestion came amid PM Modi’s criticism of those questioning his government’s handling of the China border issue. His remarks also followed inquiries by Congress MP Rahul Gandhi and Samajwadi Party leader Akhilesh Yadav during discussion on the Motion of Thanks to President’s Address in Lok Sabha.

Replying to the debate, PM Modi took the opportunity to indirectly target former Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru, a frequent subject of criticism by the BJP.

He claimed that the book revealed the “games” Nehru played with India’s foreign policy and security during his time in office.

Referring to Nehru’s tenure as both Prime Minister and the head of Foreign Affairs, PM Modi remarked: “If someone is really interested in foreign policy… they should read JFK’s Forgotten Crisis.” He remarked that the book contains references to Nehru and his interactions with then President Kennedy during a crisis, shedding light on the foreign policy tactics used by Nehru.

The PM’s reference to the book sparked a debate on social media and among foreign policy watchers.

Observers began analysing the book’s content, with some highlighting the instances mentioned in the book that involved Nehru.

One analyst, commenting on X, linked Nehru’s approach to foreign policy to the mindset allegedly shared by Rahul Gandhi, saying: “The details about Nehru, and what he used his position for, is the same mindset that Rahul Gandhi has inherited as a family. No wonder Rahul Gandhi speaks the same language as third grade trolls, including on foreign policy.”

Several excerpts from Riedel’s book were shared online, including one that depicted a tense moment during the Kennedy administration.

It describes how Nehru insisted that Jacqueline Kennedy stay in a guest suite at the Prime Minister’s residence, despite the embassy having arranged a separate villa. The suite, frequently used by Edwina Mountbatten, the wife of the last British viceroy of India, held personal significance to Nehru.

Some extracts from pages of Riedel’s book shared on X read: “The embassy had rented a villa for Mrs. Kennedy to stay in, but Nehru insisted after she arrived that she stay in a guest suite at the prime minister’s residence. It was the suite often used by Edwina Mountbatten, the wife of India’s last viceroy Lord Mountbatten, who had presided over the partition. A frequent visitor to India after independence, Edwina and Nehru were at least close friends, if not more. Jackie (Jacqueline Kennedy) was getting Nehru’s complete attention.”

The book also notes how Nehru seemed more interested in Jackie Kennedy than in President Kennedy, with JFK himself remarking that it was the “worst state visit” of his presidency.

Another passage highlights Nehru’s apparent interest in Pat Kennedy, JFK’s young sister, over the two men.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Kerala HC Allows NDPS Accused To Travel Abroad For Employment

No Criminal Charges For Pre-2013 Waqf Property Occupation: Kerala High court wayanad

The Kerala High Court has come to the help of a 24-year-old man who was the fourth accused in a Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances case when he was allowed to travel abroad for employment as the trial in the case will take a long time. The case against the young man was registered in 2018 and has been pending in a lower court since 2019.

The High Court took up the case on the report of a lower court judge that at least two years would be required for the disposal of the petitioner’s case. “This court is of the opinion that, if two years are required to dispose of the case, it will be unjust to deny the petitioner an opportunity to earn his living by working abroad,” the court observed.

The court also directed the lower court to grant him permission to travel. The petitioner submitted that he was granted bail in March 2019 and that he had approached the trial court seeking permission to travel abroad for employment, which was turned down. It was then the petitioner approached the high court and got a favourable verdict.

The high court realised after getting a report from this lower court found out that there were 4,000 cases pending and there were over 1,000 cases that were five years old. Incidentally around 41,531 NDPS cases were registered in Kerala during the 15-month period ending June 2024. Ernakulum with over 6,000 cases led from the front followed by Malappuram district (5,906 cases) followed by Kozhikode (5,385 cases ). The lowest number of NDPS cases were registered in Pathanamthitta, with only 291 cases.

–IANS

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“Has Tamil Nadu Been Gifted To Stalin Family? Nobody Can Touch Me”: BJP Leader H Raja Challenges Police For Preventing Him To Participate In Thiruparankundram Protest

BJP leader H Raja was placed under house arrest after attempting to travel to Thiruparankundram, despite prohibitory orders issued in the area.

As BJP and Hindu Munnani members began their journey towards Thiruparankundram, police arrested several individuals at various locations. Hindu Munnani leader Kadeshwara Subramaniam was among those detained.

Raja, who tried to leave his residence in Karaikudi, Alagapuri, was stopped by Sivaganga SP Parthiban. The officer informed him that due to the prohibitory order, he would not be allowed to proceed and warned that he could be arrested as a precautionary measure.

Arguing with the police, Raja questioned the legal grounds for his restriction, stating that Section 144 had not been imposed in Madurai itself. He insisted on his right to travel up to the Madurai border and challenged the legality of his detention. “If four or more people gather, the law applies, but I am traveling alone,” he asserted. He further said, “If I go with two people, your Madurai collector, your Madurai commissioner cannot touch Raja. But you people are preventing me from leaving here at my doorstep itself. How can you do it? Under which law? Has Tamil Nadu been given as a gift to the Stalin family? Does he think he can say whatever he wants? And you will follow his orders? If there are more than 3 people with me, you can arrest me. But along with me, there are only 2 people.”

Despite his protests, the police stood firm on their decision. Raja remained in his car for nearly an hour, refusing to leave. Eventually, officers placed him under house arrest, preventing him from joining the planned march to Thiruparankundram.

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Kudali Shankaracharya Announces ₹10 Lakh Cash Prize For Students Completing Rig And Yajur Veda Studies

Srimad Jagadguru Shankaracharya Kudali Sringeri Mahasamsthan Dakshinamnaya has announced a cash prize of ₹10 lakh for students who successfully complete higher Vedic studies in Rig Veda and Yajur Veda at the mutt’s gurukula.

Speaking to The New Indian Express, Shankaracharya Abhinava Shankara Bharati Mahaswamy stated that the initiative aims to preserve the ancient gurukula tradition and encourage rigorous Vedic education. The mutt has already commenced its gurukula activities to facilitate this.

The Shankaracharya explained that students will be trained in six core Shastras—Shiksha, Chandassu, Vyakarana, Nirukta, Jyothishya, and Kalpa—collectively known as ‘Shadanga’. Additionally, the curriculum includes Pratishakhya, along with Veda Samhita, Brahmana, and Aranyaka, making a total of ten granthas (epics).

  • Students who complete all ten granthas and pass the examination will earn the title ‘Dasha Granthi’ and receive a cash award of ₹5 lakh.
  • Those who continue their studies to the advanced level of Salakshana Ghanantha and pass the final examination will be awarded the title ‘Sadashagrantha Salakshana Ghanapathi’, along with a cash prize of ₹10 lakh.

10-Year Free Education Program

The gurukula course spans 10 years, with some students requiring up to 12 years to complete their studies. Education is provided free of cost, covering both Rig Veda and Yajur Veda branches.

The Shankaracharya emphasized that the primary goal of this initiative is to preserve and promote higher Vedic education for future generations.

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Thousands Including Hindu Munnani & BJP Leaders Arrested Across Tamil Nadu Ahead Of Hindu Munnani’s Protest To Protect Thiruparankundram Hill

In a large-scale crackdown, Tamil Nadu police have arrested thousands of people across the state as reported in Dinamalar to prevent their participation in a planned charity march to Thiruparankundram Hill. Several leaders of the BJP and Hindu Munnani, including senior BJP leader H. Raja and Hindu Munnani state president Kadeswara Subramanian, have been placed under house arrest.

The Hindu Munnani had organized the march to protest against alleged encroachments and reported animal sacrifices at Thiruparankundram Hill, a site revered as belonging to Lord Muruga. However, citing security concerns and the risk of communal tensions, the police imposed prohibitory orders under Section 144 in Madurai for two days.

Statewide Arrests And Detentions

Police have conducted a sweeping operation across Tamil Nadu, placing Hindu Munnani and BJP leaders under house arrest and detaining thousands of workers who were attempting to reach Thiruparankundram.

  • Karaikudi, Sivaganga District – BJP leader H. Raja was placed under house arrest.
  • Tiruppur – Hindu Munnani state president Katheeswara Subramanian was arrested along with hundreds of supporters. A protest erupted in response, leading to road blockades.
  • Nellai – Hindu Munnani state secretary Courtala Nathan was arrested.
  • Coimbatore, Trichy, and Virudhunagar – Several BJP and Hindu Munnani functionaries were detained, with some locked up in private halls.
  • Madurai – A heavy police force was deployed, with vehicles heading towards the protest site being stopped and searched.

Security Measures And Police Deployment

To prevent the march, the Tamil Nadu government has deployed:

  • 3000 police personnel led by Commissioner Loganathan.
  • Five Superintendents of Police (SPs), three Additional Deputy Superintendents of Police (ADSPs), and 13 Deputy Superintendents of Police (DSPs) from other districts.

Additionally, the Madurai Adheenam, a prominent Hindu monastery, was barred from leaving the mutt, effectively preventing their participation in the protest.

Hindu Munnani and BJP leaders strongly condemned the crackdown, alleging that the DMK-led government was suppressing their religious rights. They accused certain Muslim organizations of attempting to rename Thiruparankundram as “Sikandar Hill” and promoting religious violence.

“This is an outrageous attack on our right to worship. The police have stormed into the homes of our leaders and placed them under house arrest, stopping them from even visiting temples,” a Hindu Munnani spokesperson said.

Meanwhile, opposition leaders accused the police of acting under political pressure to curb Hindu organizations while allowing other religious groups to function freely.

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.