Home Blog Page 281

BJP TN Files Complaint Against BBC For Its Propaganda Piece Instigating India’s Gen Z To Hit The Streets

BJP TN Files Complaint Against BBC For Its Propaganda Piece Instigating India’s Gen Z To Hit The Streets

The Tamil Nadu unit of the Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP) legal cell has filed a complaint with the state Director General of Police (DGP) against BBC Tamil, accusing the outlet of attempting to incite unrest and mislead the country’s youth through a recent article.

The complaint, led by A. Kumaraguru, president of the Tamil Nadu BJP’s legal wing, targets a BBC Tamil report titled “Why are Gen Z, who destabilize governments in other countries, not taking to the streets in India?” The article was published in English as well.

The BJP has alleged that the article is part of a larger conspiracy aimed at creating discontent and provoking young people to take part in anti-government protests.

Kumaraguru stated that the report forms part of a “foreign conspiracy” to undermine India’s stability and progress. He described the article as “misleading and malicious,” alleging that it was intended to tarnish India’s image and disrupt peace within the country. He further stated that such efforts by foreign media were aimed at halting India’s growth, especially as the nation had risen to become the world’s fourth-largest economy.

Calling for strict police action, Kumaraguru urged authorities to ensure that no media outlet publishes what he termed as “inflammatory and false” content in the future. BJP State Vice President Paul Kanagaraj and other members of the party’s legal cell were also present during the press briefing.

(Source: Latestly)

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsApp, Telegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Armstrong Murder Case: Slain BSP Leader’s Wife Moves Supreme Court For Monitored CBI Investigation, Says Tamil Nadu Police Suppressed Crucial Evidence

Armstrong Murder Case: Slain BSP Leader’s Wife Moves Supreme Court For Monitored CBI Investigation, Says Tamil Nadu Police Suppressed Crucial Evidence

The wife of slain Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) leader and prominent Dalit activist Armstrong has approached the Supreme Court seeking to support the demand for a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe into her husband’s murder.

Porkodi, Armstrong’s wife, filed an intervention application in the Special Leave Petition (SLP) filed by the State of Tamil Nadu, which challenges the Madras High Court’s order that quashed the state police’s chargesheet and transferred the investigation to the CBI.

On 10 October 2025, the Supreme Court stayed the High Court’s order quashing the chargesheet but did not stay the CBI investigation, allowing the central agency to continue its probe.

In her application, Porkodi stated that the case has a bearing on the “national conscience” and urged the Court to ensure a CBI investigation under the monitoring of a Supervisory Committee headed by a former Supreme Court Judge, similar to the arrangement in the Karur stampede case. She also sought witness protection under the Witness Protection Scheme, 2018.

“Formation of supervisory committee is needed due to the fact that various important facts were deliberately omitted in the charge-sheet which have clear nexus with the motive and intent with which this dastardly crime has happened. Various facts which goes to the root of the matter and requires a fair relook in the nature of de-novo investigation since the earlier investigation has been prima facie found deficient and impartial by the High Court,” Porkodi stated in her application.

The intervention follows the September 24 order of the Madras High Court, delivered by Justice P. Velmurugan, in a petition filed by Armstrong’s brother, Keynos. The Court had then directed a CBI probe after finding major shortcomings in the investigation by the State Police, citing procedural lapses and material contradictions in the chargesheet.

Porkodi noted that she had also filed a separate petition before the Madras High Court questioning the State Police’s investigation, but with the case now pending before the Supreme Court, the High Court was unlikely to issue further orders in her plea.

Armstrong, who was a well-known Dalit leader and the BSP’s Tamil Nadu president, was hacked to death on July 5, 2024, outside his residence in Perambur, Chennai, by a group of armed assailants.

(Source: LiveLaw)

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

UK PM Keir Starmer Calls Pakistani Grooming Gangs As Asian

UK PM Keir Starmer Calls Pakistani Grooming Gangs As Asian

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer is facing strong criticism after a letter he wrote to survivors of child sexual abuse referred to perpetrators of grooming gang crimes as “Asian men.” Critics say the phrasing downplays the predominantly Pakistani and Bangladeshi Muslim backgrounds of those convicted in such cases.

The letter, dated 24 October 2025 and sent from 10 Downing Street, thanked four survivors – Fiona, Elizabeth, Jessica, and Ellie-Ann for serving on the expert panel of the national inquiry into grooming gangs. In it, Starmer acknowledged that “in some areas these crimes were disproportionately committed by Asian men,” promising that the inquiry would “look explicitly at that.”

The statement drew immediate backlash online, with many accusing the Prime Minister of using vague racial terminology to avoid identifying the cultural and religious aspects of the scandal.

National Inquiry in Crisis

Starmer’s comments come as his government faces growing mistrust from victims of grooming gang crimes. Four survivors recently resigned from the advisory panel overseeing the national inquiry, accusing the government of diluting the probe to avoid focusing solely on gangs largely made up of Pakistani-origin men. They alleged that officials were trying to broaden the inquiry to include other forms of sexual abuse, which they see as an attempt to water down its purpose.

The national inquiry was established in June after years of pressure over the government’s handling of grooming gang scandals, which have haunted Britain for more than two decades. Thousands of girls, some as young as 11, were sexually exploited across towns such as Rotherham, Rochdale, and Telford, mostly by Pakistani-origin men targeting white working-class girls. The survivors’ distrust has deepened after two candidates approached to lead the inquiry, a senior police officer and a social worker were rejected over alleged conflicts of interest linked to previous institutional cover-ups.

A Long and Troubled History

Reports of Pakistani taxi drivers grooming girls in Rotherham first emerged in 2001, but convictions began only after 2010. In one of the most notorious cases last month, seven Pakistani men were convicted in Rochdale for a five-year campaign of rape against two girls that began when they were just 13. The court heard that one of the victims had been “passed around for sex” by more than 200 offenders.

Despite hundreds of victims coming forward nationwide, only 68 perpetrators have been convicted so far. The majority are of Pakistani origin, with a few from Bangladesh and Afghanistan. Police and social workers were long accused of ignoring the abuse out of fear of being called racist or upsetting Labour’s voter base in Pakistani-dominated constituencies.

Chief Inspector Alan Edwards told The Times in 2001, “Everyone’s been too scared to address the ethnicity factor.” Labour’s hesitation has since been interpreted as political self-preservation, especially given its dependence on British-Pakistani communities for electoral support.

Starmer, alongside Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood, has pledged that the inquiry will “keep survivors at its heart” and hold accountable both perpetrators and institutions that failed to act. But critics say his latest letter shows that the government still lacks the political will to confront the uncomfortable truths behind the grooming gang scandal.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

Pune Techie Zubair Arrested By Maharashtra ATS For Alleged Links With Al Qaeda

A software engineer from Pune has been arrested by the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) for his alleged links with Pakistan-based terrorist group Al Qaeda and for purportedly engaging in activities aimed at radicalising Indian youth.

The accused, identified as Zubair Hangargekar, was taken into custody from Pune’s Kondhwa area on Monday after being under ATS surveillance for nearly a month. He was produced before a Special Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) Court, which remanded him to police custody till 4 November 2025.

According to ATS officials, Hangargekar is suspected of involvement in anti-national activities and of plotting terror strikes in Maharashtra and other Indian cities. During searches at his residence and workplace, investigators reportedly seized electronic devices and documents that the police believe were intended to aid in the radicalisation of young people.

A senior police officer said the material recovered indicated possible links to online extremist networks and suggested that Hangargekar may have been in contact with foreign handlers.

The arrest follows a series of recent actions by the Pune ATS targeting alleged terror modules in the region. On October 9, the squad raided multiple locations across Pune, seizing digital storage devices and papers pointing to what authorities described as a “wider terror network” operating in western India. More recently, on October 27, Pune Police detained four individuals from the Chennai Express at Pune Railway Station for questioning in connection with the same probe.

Hangargekar’s arrest also coincides with a larger national effort to dismantle online extremist recruitment channels. Earlier this month, the Delhi Police’s Special Cell and Madhya Pradesh Police jointly arrested Mohammad Adnan Khan alias Abu Muharib (19) from Delhi’s Sadiq Nagar and Adnan Khan alias Abu Mohammad (20) from Bhopal in an Islamic State-related case.

Investigations into that case have revealed that both men were radicalised online and were reporting to a handler based in Syria, underscoring the continued activity of global jihadist networks despite territorial losses in the Middle East.

Intelligence Bureau sources said the India operations of both Al Qaeda and ISIS appear to be coordinated from Syria, where ISIS has recently re-emerged with renewed strength. Data cited by counter-terrorism officials suggest that ISIS has already conducted 115 attacks worldwide this year, compared to 72 last year, signaling a possible resurgence of the group’s operational capacity.

The ATS continues to question Hangargekar to determine the extent of his alleged involvement and identify any associates within India or abroad.

(Source: NDTV)

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

Zohran Mamdani Clarifies “Aunt” In His 9/11 Hijab Story Was Actually His Father’s Cousin

zohran mamdani jizya donation

Mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani was forced to clarify Monday, 27 October 2025, that the “aunt” he described in an emotional campaign story about post-9/11 Islamophobia was actually his father’s cousin who passed away a few years ago, after critics questioned the account and identified his biological aunt as a woman living in Tanzania at the time.

The controversy emerged after Mamdani’s tearful speech on Friday outside the Islamic Cultural Center in The Bronx, where he recalled how his “aunt” stopped taking the subway after the 11 September 2001, terror attacks because she “did not feel safe in her hijab.”

The Democratic Socialist candidate addressed the controversy on Monday during a press conference, saying, “I was speaking about Zehra fuhi, my father’s cousin, who passed away a few years ago.” Mamdani explained that he used the term “fuhi,” which means paternal aunt in Urdu and Hindi, as a familial expression of respect rather than a literal reference to an aunt.

On 24 October 2025, Mamdani made the remarks outside a Bronx Mosque, where he spoke about what he described as “indignities” faced by Muslims in New York after the September 11 attacks.

Surrounded by Muslim community leaders, Mamdani said, “I want to speak to the Muslims of New York City.” In the next few seconds, in what seems like pretence to shed a few tears, he then spoke of the “memory of his aunt”, who stopped taking the subway after September 11. He said, “I want to speak to the memory of my aunt, who stopped taking the subway after September 11 because she did not feel safe in her hijab.” He also recounted allegedly being advised to conceal his religious identity when he first entered politics, describing these experiences as shared lessons among Muslim New Yorkers. Mamdani added that “over these last few days, these lessons have become the closing messages of Andrew Cuomo, Curtis Sliwa, and Eric Adams.”

Soon after, social media started digging into the details. Ater extensive review, it appears Zohran Mamdani has three aunts – two of whom are Hindu (from his mother’s side), making the hijab reference inapplicable, while the only Muslim aunt, according to public records and biographical information, is not known to wear a hijab and has never been a resident of New York City.

Further reporting indicates that during the period in question, his aunt was living in Tanzania. Records show she resided there from January 2000 until at least December 2003, meaning she was not in New York City before, during, or after the 9/11 attacks.

Image Source: X
Image Source: Devex

The fact-checking investigation concluded that the individual Mamdani referred to as his aunt “who was scared of taking the bus wearing her hijab” is a person who, according to available information, does not wear the hijab and was not living in the United States at the time.

Image Source: X

However, as many netizens were expecting, Mamdani changed the goalpost and said he talked about a distant cousin of his father – the aunt he was referring to in his story.

 (Source: New York Post)

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

Islamist NYC Mayoral Candidate Zohran Mamdani’s Father Mahmood Mamdani In 2004 Book Says, Suicide Bomber Is A “Category Of Soldier”

In a resurfaced excerpt from his 2004 book, Mahmood Mamdani, a professor at Columbia University and father of New York mayoral candidate and Islamist terror supporter Zohran Mamdani, argued for a controversial reframing of suicide bombers, stating they should be seen as soldiers rather than barbarians in the aftermath of the 9/11 Twin Tower terror attack.

The excerpts, from his book Good Muslim, Bad Muslim: America, the Cold War, and the Roots of Terror, have gone viral. In them, Mamdani writes, “Suicide bombing needs to be understood as a feature of modern political violence rather than stigmatized as a mark of barbarism. We need to recognize the suicide bomber, first and foremost, as a category of soldier.”

This book was published just three years after the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

In a subsequent interview with the Asia Society, Mamdani elaborated on his stance, arguing that understanding non-state terror requires examining its link to state violence. He dismissed common Western media interpretations of suicide bombers as “a throwback to pre-modernity.”

Calling those views “too easy and too self-serving,” Mamdani presented his own analysis, stating, “The reality is more likely the opposite; the suicide bomber is more likely born of a youth revolt than of patriarchal authority. The suicide bomber comes out of the history of the Intifadah.”

He further justified his “soldier” classification by pointing to the prolonged Israeli occupation of Palestine, which he described as a “brutal reality.” He argued that the “failure of the older generation to find a humane alternative” led to the desperation of the young.

“Even then, we need to recognize that the term suicide bomber is a misnomer. The suicide bomber is a category of soldier whose objective is to kill – even if he or she must die to kill,” Mamdani said in the interview.

(Source: Times of India)

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

Shankar Who Gave Back-To-Back Flops Like Indian 2 And Game Changer Hails Another Flop Film That Peddles Hate Against Brahmins And Shows Nirmala Sitharaman Look-Alike As Corrupt

Tamil film director Shankar, who has been reeling from consecutive box office disappointments with Indian 2 and Game Changer, has now courted fresh controversy by praising yet another divisive film from Kollywood – Sakthi Thirumagan.

On his X handle, Shankar wrote: Happened to see #SakthiThirumagan on OTT. A thought provoking film. The questions raised by the director were very reasonable and impressive for me. So many issues were addressed in this movie. The intensity of the content grows bigger and bigger in an unexpected way. Hats off to @ArunPrabu_. Kudos to @vijayantony and the whole team!

However, Shankar’s endorsement has raised eyebrows across Tamil cinema circles and social media alike. The film he praised, directed by Arun Prabhu and starring Vijay Antony, has been widely criticised as a propaganda-laden Dravidianist project that vilifies the Brahmin community and peddles political bias under the guise of social realism.

Sakthi Thirumagan – A Dravidianist Communal Propaganda Film That Peddles Hate Against Brahmins

Shankar’s praise stands in stark contrast to the widespread criticism the film has received for its blatant communalism and political targeting. As analyzed by critics, Sakthi Thirumagan is not a subtle political thriller but a film that deliberately peddles hate.

Anti-Brahmin Caricatures: The central villain, a crony capitalist named Abhyankkar Srinivasa Swamy, is portrayed as a sloka-chanting Brahmin, a lazy and inflammatory stereotype. The narrative incessantly highlights a so-called “Brahmin lobby” as the source of the nation’s ills. In one of its most disturbing subplots, the “hero” seeks revenge for a rape by manipulating a minor to murder the perpetrator—a character pointedly identified as a Brahmin principal and pedophile.

Targeting a Union Minister: The film features a corrupt central minister character whose appearance is a clear, unflattering look-alike of Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, a move perceived as a deliberate and personal political attack.

Glorifying Criminal Vigilantism: The protagonist, Kittu (Vijay Antony), is celebrated for engaging in unlawful activities, including cryptocurrency manipulation, funding bombings, and orchestrating murder, all framed as righteous acts against a corrupt system.

Overall, the film was a “toxic sh*t film” where the makers “jumped into the Dravidianist septic tank”, a film that scapegoated the Brahmin community and the Central Government for Tamil Nadu’s problems while absolving the state’s own political establishment.

Shankar’s Downward Graph

Shankar’s endorsement is particularly notable given his own precarious professional standing. Once hailed as a blockbuster maker, the director has recently faced two of the biggest commercial failures of his career.

Indian 2: The long-awaited sequel to his 1996 hit was a monumental box-office disaster, criticized for being shoddily made, a three-hour-long mess with a nonsensical plot, ridiculous Varma Kalai sequences, and cringe-worthy dialogues. The film cowardly parroted Dravidianist propaganda, demonizing Gujaratis and wealthy industrialists while ignoring Tamil Nadu’s own corruption.

Game Changer: Starring Ram Charan, this bilingual film also failed to connect with audiences, continuing Shankar’s string of poor performances.

This context makes his public support for another commercially unsuccessful and critically panned film a curious choice. Industry observers suggest that by aligning himself with the overtly EVRist and anti-establishment messaging of Sakthi Thirumagan, Shankar may be attempting to reposition himself within the dominant Dravidianist narrative.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

Elon Musk Launches Grokipedia, An Open-Source AI-Powered Rival To Woke & Biased Wikipedia

Elon Musk Launches Grokipedia, An Open-Source AI-Powered Rival To Woke & Biased Wikipedia

In a direct challenge to what he describes as systemic bias in mainstream knowledge repositories, tech billionaire Elon Musk has launched Grokipedia, an open-source encyclopedia built by his artificial intelligence company xAI. The platform, which went live on 27 October 2025, promises to offer a “massive improvement” over Wikipedia by providing depth and neutrality, free of charge and without usage limits.

The announcement comes just weeks after Musk first proposed the idea on his social media platform X, stating that Grokipedia was a “necessary step towards the xAI goal of understanding the Universe.” The launch appears to be a response to long-standing criticisms from Musk and others, including Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger, who have accused the platform of being “hopelessly biased” by left-wing activists and “woke ideology.”

A Contrast in Content: Godhra and George Floyd

The fundamental difference in editorial approach is immediately apparent when comparing entries on both platforms. For instance, the entry for the 2002 Godhra train burning showcases a stark contrast.

Wikipedia’s opening paragraph describes the event where 59 Hindu pilgrims were killed, noting that “the cause of the fire remains disputed,” and quickly pivots to the subsequent Gujarat riots.

Wikipedia page for Godhra Train Burning

Grokipedia’s entry states unequivocally that it was an “arson attack” by a “mob of around 1,000–2,000 local Muslims,” citing forensic reports of pre-procured petrol and court convictions.

Grokipedia page for Godhra Train Burning

An even more pronounced divergence is seen in the entries for George Floyd. Wikipedia identifies him as an “African American man who was murdered by a white police officer” and focuses on the subsequent global protests.

Wikipedia page for George Floyd

Grokipedia leads with Floyd’s “lengthy criminal record.” It details the official medical examiner’s report citing contributing factors like “fentanyl intoxication” and “cardiovascular disease,” alongside the circumstances of his death.

Grokipedia page for George Floyd

Supporters of the new platform argue that Grokipedia’s inclusion of such details provides crucial context often omitted from mainstream narratives. A user on X commented, “The nuance and detail on Grokipedia is FAR superior to Wikipedia and is clearly not pushing any ideologies. Corrections like this are critical to our AI future.”

According to Musk, Grokipedia is “fully open source, so anyone can use it for anything at no cost.” The platform, powered by the Grok AI model, launched with nearly 900,000 generated articles and features like transparent edit histories and AI-validated user changes.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

“Appalling Double Standards”: BJP Leader Annamalai Slams MK Stalin For Calling Electoral Roll SIR As “Conspiracy To Snatch Voting Rights”

annamalai stalin SIR voting rights black flag BJP Leader Annamalai Announces Black Flag Protest During CM Stalin’s Tiruppur Visit Over Garbage Dumping Issue

A major political confrontation has erupted in Tamil Nadu after the Election Commission of India (ECI) announced a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, with the ruling DMK and its allies alleging a “conspiracy to snatch away the voting rights of the people” and the BJP accusing the opposition of “appalling double standards.”

The controversy intensified hours after the ECI’s announcement, which covers 12 states including the poll-bound Tamil Nadu. The DMK-led alliance, in a strongly worded resolution, called for an all-party meeting on 2 November 2025 to decide its next course of action.

DMK’s Allegations of a “Bihar Model” and Disenfranchisement

In a strongly worded resolution, the DMK-led alliance, headed by Chief Minister M.K. Stalin, described the SIR exercise as a “conspiracy to snatch away the voting rights of the people of Tamil Nadu.” It drew parallels with the large-scale voter deletions reported in Bihar earlier this year.

Citing what it termed “credible information” that several lakh voters were removed in Bihar and that only a fraction were later restored, the DMK said the deletions had disproportionately affected Muslims, Dalits, and women. It expressed concern that a similar pattern could unfold in Tamil Nadu under the pretext of voter list correction.

The resolution also referred to the Supreme Court’s recent directive to the Election Commission to accept Aadhaar as a valid proof to safeguard genuine voters – an order the DMK accused the EC of not implementing. “Why is the Election Commission refusing to accept Aadhaar as a complete document? Why not accept our demand to include family cards?” the party asked, calling the poll body’s approach “controversial and suspicious.”

The alliance clarified that it was not opposed to voter list revisions in principle but objected to the timing and methodology. Conducting such an extensive exercise during the northeast monsoon months of November and December, it said, was “impractical and ill-conceived,” likely to cause hardship to lakhs of voters asked to affix photos and attach downloaded copies of old electoral rolls.

“Under the guise of SIR, we fear a repeat of the Bihar model of voter deletions. Tamil Nadu will not allow this,” the statement declared, urging political parties to unite against what it called an “undemocratic move.”

Echoing this on social media, Chief Minister M.K. Stalin wrote, “#SIR in Tamil Nadu: We will resist disenfranchisement and defeat #VoteTheft.

To carry out Special Intensive Revision just months before the election, and especially during the monsoon months of November and December, brings serious practical difficulties. To conduct SIR in a hasty and opaque manner is nothing but a conspiracy by the ECI to rob citizens of their rights and help the BJP.

In Bihar, large numbers of women, minorities and people from SC and ST communities were removed from the electoral rolls, and the absence of transparency has fuelled serious suspicion in the public mind.

Now the ECI has announced that #SIR will begin in Tamil Nadu from next week. Following the announcement, we held discussions with our alliance partners, and on that basis an all party meeting will be convened on 2 November to decide the next course of action.

The right to vote is the foundation of democracy. Tamil Nadu will fight against any attempt to murder it, and Tamil Nadu will win.”

BJP’s Rebuttal: “Hollow Understanding” and “Selective Amnesia”

BJP state president K. Annamalai issued a sharp rebuttal, calling Stalin’s stance “appalling double standards.”

“The Intensive revisions of electoral rolls, in all or some parts of the country, have been undertaken 12 times earlier… Clearly, this is not the first time,” Annamalai stated.

He dismissed the DMK’s reliance on the Bihar example, saying, “We request that Thiru Stalin avl not rely on the imagination of Thiru Tejashwi Yadav on the deletion of electoral rolls of a certain section of people in Bihar.”

In a detailed counter, the BJP leader highlighted the DMK’s own past demands for rigorous voter list revisions. He pointed to the party’s 2016 claim of 57.43 lakh “bogus voters” in the state, its 2017 petition to the Madras High Court for voter list revision ahead of the RK Nagar bypoll, and its formal representation to the Election Commission requesting Aadhaar linking and door-to-door checks.

“Thiru MK Stalin, have you forgotten the time when you sought the intervention of the Hon Madras High Court for the revision of electoral rolls?” Annamalai asked. “The sanctity of democracy rests on the integrity of the electoral roll, and one hopes that the DMK rediscovers this wisdom, sparing the state another episode of selective amnesia.”

Meanwhile, the AIADMK, now re-allied with the BJP, welcomed the ECI’s move, urging it to be carried out “in an orderly and transparent manner,” and accused the DMK of “preparing excuses in advance for its defeat in the 2026 elections.”

Separately, the DMK organised a workshop in Mamallapuram for more than 3,000 poll functionaries on Monday, addressed by Chief Minister Stalin, to strategise ahead of the SIR and the 2026 elections.

(Source: NDTV)

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally. 

Radical Faction Of Zohran Mamdani’s DSA Praised Terrorist Who Murdered Israeli Embassy Staffers, Signed Petition To Free Him

The Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), the organization backing mayoral frontrunner Zohran Mamdani, is facing a severe public condemnation just as the NYC mayoral polls come closer and the information that a radical faction within its ranks openly praised and launched a campaign to free Elias Rodriguez, the man accused of murdering two Israeli embassy staffers in a terror attack in Washington, D.C.

The Attack and the Attacker

On 21 May 2025, Elias Rodriguez, 31, allegedly approached a group of four people leaving an event at the Capital Jewish Museum and opened fire at close range, killing Yaron Lischinsky, 28, and Sarah Milgrim, 26. Upon his arrest, Rodriguez yelled, “Free, free Palestine!”

Federal investigators uncovered a letter, posted to social media around the time of the attack and linked to Rodriguez, which criticized Israeli actions in Gaza and called the killings an “armed action” and a form of protest. Rodriguez later told police he was inspired by the US airman who set himself on fire outside the Israeli Embassy in 2024, whom he called a “martyr.”

The “Free Elias Rodriguez” Campaign

A week after the murders, a coalition of 28 pro-Palestine and Marxist groups, operating under the banner “Unity of Fields,” announced the formation of a “Free Elias Rodriguez Organizing Committee.” Their campaign statement explicitly justified the killings, calling them “a legitimate act of resistance against the zionist state and its genocidal campaign in Gaza” and declaring that “such counter-violence is legitimate, it is justice.”

Among the co-signers of this campaign was the DSA Liberation Caucus, a self-identified Marxist-Leninist-Maoist faction within the Democratic Socialists of America. The caucus took to social media to glorify Rodriguez, posting a black-and-white sketch of him set against a Palestinian flag stamped with a hammer and sickle. The post proclaimed, “It is right to rebel against the enemy. This is Maoist law.”

The campaign statement urged supporters to mail letters to Rodriguez in jail, send monetary support, attend his court hearings, and “raise voices” in his defence.

Zohran Mamdani’s Democrat Socialists of America signed onto a statement calling to release Elias Rodriguez, the terrorist who executed two Jews in Washington DC last spring. pic.twitter.com/x5Vf9hwTbL

The DSA Liberation Caucus also celebrates October 7 as “Resistance Day”.

Mainstream DSA’s Fractured Response

The public lionization of a suspected terrorist by one of its own caucuses forced the national DSA to respond. The main body of the organization issued a public disavowal, stating, “Democratic Socialists of America seek to democratically transform our society and reject vigilante violence. We condemn the murder of Israeli embassy workers. Any statement otherwise is not the stance of DSA.”

However, this condemnation did not satisfy critics, who point to the ongoing support for Rodriguez from the entrenched DSA Liberation Caucus. In a direct challenge, Unity of Fields called on DSA mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, who stated that he is a proud member of the DSA, to “commend the DSA Liberation Caucus for upholding Elias Rodriguez’s righteous action.”

A Pattern of Extremist Associations

The controversy extends beyond the DSA. Other groups supporting the “Free Elias” campaign have documented ties to terror organizations. Samidoun, a co-signer, was proscribed as a terrorist organization in the US and Canada in 2024 for acting as a front for the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP). Another signatory, the Bronx Anti-War Coalition, has previously displayed banners featuring the flags of Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and other designated terrorist groups at anti-Israel rallies.

Political Fallout for Mamdani

For Zohran Mamdani, the leading candidate in the New York City mayoral race, the incident presents a profound challenge. While he has denied being a communist amid GOP calls to investigate and revoke his citizenship, his political identity is inextricably linked to the DSA. The revelation that a significant caucus within his own political home is actively supporting a domestic terrorist accused of murdering diplomats places him in a precarious position, forcing him to navigate between the mainstream socialist platform of his campaign and the radical, violent fringe that operates within the same movement.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsAppTelegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.