Home Blog Page 246

Over 3.6 Lakh Dog Bites Reported In Tamil Nadu In 2025; Rabies Deaths Rise

rabies dog bite tamil nadu

Health authorities in Tamil Nadu have raised alarm over the sharp rise in dog bite incidents across the state and cautioned that failing to complete the rabies vaccination schedule significantly raises the risk of contracting the deadly virus.

Official records reveal a concerning trend, in 2021, Tamil Nadu saw 3,19,432 dog bite cases resulting in 19 deaths due to rabies. The situation worsened in 2022 with 3,64,435 cases and 28 deaths. By 2023, the number of reported dog bites had climbed to 4,41,804, with 18 fatalities. In the current year alone (2025), over 3.6 lakh people have been bitten, and 22 rabies-related deaths have been reported so far, according to the Department of Public Health and Disease Prevention.

Medical professionals explained that rabies is a viral infection transmitted through the saliva of infected animals, most commonly through bites. The virus attacks the central nervous system, particularly the brain. Symptoms typically appear within three weeks to three months after exposure and include hydrophobia (fear of water), light sensitivity, breathlessness, sensitivity to wind, and memory issues.

Doctors emphasize the importance of quick response following a dog bite. “The first step is to wash the affected area thoroughly with soap and water for at least 15 minutes. Immediate medical attention and vaccination must follow,” advised Dr. Aysha Shaheen, Director and Superintendent at Royapettah Government Hospital, and Dr. Bhaskaran, Superintendent of Kilpauk Medical College, during an interview.

Anti-Rabies Vaccines (ARV) are available at government medical college hospitals and primary health centers throughout Tamil Nadu. Physicians warn that completing the entire vaccine schedule is crucial for protection. “Skipping doses can leave you vulnerable to the infection,” said Dr. Shaheen.

She also highlighted a recent case from Royapettah Government Hospital. A patient named Nasruddin, who received only the initial dose of the rabies vaccine, failed to return for the remaining doses and tragically died from rabies on 12 September. “There is no cure once symptoms begin. Rabies ultimately results in respiratory failure,” she warned.

Public health officials are urging the public to remain vigilant, follow medical advice after any dog bite, and ensure full completion of the vaccination course to avoid preventable deaths.

(With inputs from ETV Bharat)

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“Were The Documents Destroyed On Directive?” Supreme Court Justice Nagarathna Raps TN Govt Over 41 Missing Idol Theft Records

supreme court nagarathna missing idols tn govt

On 16 September 2025, the Supreme Court questioned the Tamil Nadu government over the disappearance of 41 important files connected to idol theft investigations, emphasizing that safeguarding cultural heritage is a fundamental responsibility of the State.

Justice R. Mahadevan, sitting on a Bench led by Justice B.V. Nagarathna, expressed concern, stating that ever since the initial petitions were submitted to the Madras High Court, it was made clear that 376 idols had been stolen. Authorities were provided with details indicating that many of these stolen idols were located in foreign museums. However, after these reports were handed over, 41 related files mysteriously vanished. “What happened to those files? Why are they missing?” Justice Mahadevan asked senior advocate Sanjay Hegde, representing the State along with lawyer Sabarish Subramanium.

In response, Hegde informed the court that some of the missing documents had been reconstructed. But this did not satisfy the Bench. Justice Mahadevan further questioned whether any First Information Reports (FIRs) had been filed over the missing documents, warning, “If necessary, we will summon the Chief Secretary. The State must take cultural preservation seriously.”

Justice Nagarathna also raised sharp concerns, demanding full transparency about the files’ disappearance. “Did 38 police stations coincidentally experience fires that destroyed these documents? Or was there a directive to destroy them?” she asked pointedly.

The hearing stemmed from a petition filed by advocate Elephant Rajendran, who called for an impartial investigation into the missing records. Rajendran alleged that the files involved cases concerning the theft of ancient idols, valuable artefacts, temple jewelry, and other cultural assets. He claimed their disappearance was the result of a deep-rooted conspiracy involving senior police officials, government bureaucrats, and an organized idol-smuggling network.

In response to these claims, Hegde told the court that 11 FIRs had been registered in connection with the case, and that some of the stolen idols had been recovered.

Rajendran’s petition also referenced a 2019 observation by the Madras High Court, which noted, “Tamil Nadu is renowned for its grand temples and rich cultural legacy. Many of its consecrated idols are of immense historical and spiritual significance, some dating back 1,500 to 2,000 years.”

(With inputs from The Hindu)

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“Karunanidhi TV Workshop?” AIADMK Slams Dravidianist Media For Peddling DMK’s Propaganda Over EPS’ Meeting With Amit Shah

aiadmk dmk karunanidhi

The AIADMK IT wing came down heavily on the Dravidianist media for launching a biased campaign against the party, particularly with the elections approaching. They accused certain media outlets of taking sides with the ruling DMK government to target and tarnish the parties reputation.

On 16 September 2025, the AIADMK IT wing released a statement that read, “Is this really your reporting, dear media? What car did Honourable Revolutionary Tamilian @EPSTamilNadu, go in? What color handkerchief did he wipe his face with? He will wipe his face, he’ll even blow his nose… that’s all human nature. Is this what you were watching, standing with a camera at the Home Minister’s doorstep? And by the way, Honourable Edappadiyar met the Indian Home Minister not the Pakistani minister, right? Looking at them publishing news in this manner, and on top of that, struggling to set a narrative by posting 3 videos, it seems like all these people came from the Karunanidhi TV workshop!! (P.S.: Is there an extra allowance for posting the same video 3 times?)”

This statement was a response to a series of videos shared by News18 Tamil Nadu, which were seen as an attempt to weaken the party and favor the DMK ahead of the elections.

Here are the videos they criticized:

In a recent move, News 18 Tamil Nadu also attempted to create a political narrative by airing selectively edited speech of Tamil Nadu’s political leaders. These videos focused on opposition leaders, not to highlight their positions, but to protect certain parties’ interests, especially as both the AIADMK and PMK are dealing with internal issues, while portraying the DMK alliance as unified and strong. The clips concluded with Deputy Chief Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin appealing to women for their votes, framing the DMK’s victory as assured. Rather than offering political commentary, this edited video appeared more like a PR campaign for the DMK.

In this context, the AIADMK accused the media of not only distorting the facts but also engaging in political manipulation to boost the ruling party’s chances in the upcoming elections.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Prarthana Sammelan’s Silver Jubilee – Quarter Of A Century Dedicated To Prayers For The Soldiers Protecting Bharat

The Srimath Srikantha Sivacharya Trust marks the 25th anniversary of the Bharatha Abirakshana Prarthana Sammelan, an annual prayer gathering first initiated during the 1999 Kargil War (Operation Vijay). The silver jubilee valedictory function was held on Wednesday, 17 September 2025, at Sri Somanatha Swami Temple, Surakudi, Karalkal.

The event, which has been conducted annually since the Kargil conflict, is dedicated to the welfare of the Indian people, the strength and protection of Defence, Police and Fire Brigade personnel, and the peace of martyrs who sacrificed their lives for the motherland.

What Is Bharat Aprakshana Prarthana Sammelan?

The Bharat Aprakshana Prarthana Sammelan is a spiritual initiative dedicated to the protection and prosperity of India (Bharat) and its defenders. Organized by the Srimath Srikanta Shivacharya Veda Shivagama Vidhyapeetam, its core practice involves the chanting of the Pasupatastra mantra, one crore time, and performing one lakh homams (fire rituals). This event, which has been held annually for 25 years since the Kargil War, prays for the welfare, moral strength, and physical fortitude of the nation’s military, police, and emergency service personnel.

Drawing inspiration from epics where divine weapons like the Pasupatastra, received by Arjuna brought victory, the Sammelan believes that spiritual strength complements physical bravery. The rituals seek blessings from Goddess Veera Lakshmi and aim to ensure both victory and peace for the souls of fallen heroes, embodying a deep, devotional support for the nation and its protectors.

Rituals and Vedic Chants

This year’s program included a special chanting of the Pasupathastra Mantra one crore times along with a Homa, highlighting the trust’s continued effort to safeguard and propagate the traditions of Veda Sivagama, described as the soul of Lord Parameswara and the roots of this world.

The Veda Dwani Students performed invocatory recitations, followed by blessings from Dr. Sivasri Bala Sarveswara Gurukkal, Founder and Prathama Guru of Srimath Srikantha Sivacharya Veda Sivagama VidyaPeetam, Karalkal; Sri D. Devarajan, Temple Administrative Officer, Sri Somaratha Swami Sri Lakshminarayana Perumal and Anpukkariyamman Devasthanam, Surakudi.

Souvenir Release

A commemorative souvenir was released by Sri A. Subramanian, Major Madhan Kumar, Superintendent of Police, West Sub Division, Villianur, Puducherry.

Copies were received by dignitaries including Retired army officer, Major Madhan Kumar, Superintendent of Police, North Sub Division, Karalkal – M. Murugaiyan, Commanding Officer, 2(P) Independent Coy NCC, Karalkal – Lt. Col. Ranjeet Rathee,
Squadron Leader S. Manoj Kumar, Indian Air Force, Retired Indian Navy Deputy Commandant U. Veeramani, Assistant Divisional Fire Officer, Karalkal, J. Mukundan.

Speaking ahead of the event, the organisers said the annual Sammelan reflects the Trust’s vision to cherish, protect, and develop Vedic traditions and Sanskrit learning while dedicating prayers for India’s unity, safety, and the strength of its armed forces.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Chhattisgarh: “We Have Decided To Lay Down Arms”: CPI (Maoist) Announces Month-Long Ceasefire, Call For Talks With Centre

Left-Wing Extremism Saw Significant Decline In 2024 As India Set Sights On Eradication By 2026 chhattisgarh maoist ceasefire

In a dramatic development, the outlawed Communist Party of India (Maoist) has declared a temporary suspension of its armed struggle for a month and expressed readiness to engage in conditional peace talks with the central government.

The Maoists, in their statement, appealed to the government to convey its decision on the issue through the internet and government news channels. The press note also included a Facebook and email ID for senior cadres lodged in jails across the country to share their views.

Speaking to TOI, Chhattisgarh Deputy Chief Minister and Home Minister Vijay Sharma said the authenticity of the letter needed to be verified. He pointed out that it was the first time a Maoist note carried a picture of the spokesperson, had a different writing style, and even mentioned an email ID. Sharma described the use of the term “ceasefire” as highly objectionable, stating there was no war that required such a term. He added that in a democracy there could not be “conditional” talks and noted that Maoists had once again put forward conditions as in the past. He said that after verifying the press note, the government would deliberate internally before making a decision.

Sharma further underlined that although the ceasefire letter was dated August 15, Maoists had since then killed villagers and planted IEDs that injured security personnel. He reiterated that the best option for Maoists would be to surrender, avail themselves of the rehabilitation policy, and contribute to nation-building even by participating in political life if they so wished.

Last year, Minister Sharma had initiated an appeal for peace talks in an exclusive interview with TOI, inviting the Maoists to a dialogue through a platform of their choice, whether by video call, personal meeting, or phone conversation.

The latest Maoist statement, issued by central committee spokesperson ‘Abhay’ and dated 15 August 2025, carried a clarification that its release was delayed due to certain reasons. It was circulated on Tuesday in the insurgency-hit Bastar region of Chhattisgarh. While in April this year the Maoists had spoken of a ceasefire and peace talks under conducive conditions, this marks the first time the outfit has formally declared a ceasefire at the national level.

The two-page statement signed by Abhay said the organisation would now focus on “mass struggles” to address the problems of India’s oppressed sections instead of continuing armed confrontation. The Maoists claimed that since late March 2025 they had been making “serious and sincere efforts” to initiate peace talks. On 10 May 2025, then general secretary Basavaraju who was killed later that month in an encounter in Bastar, had proposed a one-month ceasefire to enable senior leaders to deliberate on laying down arms.

However, the note said the government had not responded positively and instead intensified “encirclement and elimination” operations launched since January 2024, with thousands of armed police deployed in Maoist strongholds.

The Maoists cited the deadly encounter in Chhattisgarh’s Marh region on 21 May 2025, in which Basavaraju, along with 28 central committee members and security staff, was killed. They said the present peace initiative was a continuation of the process begun by their slain leader.

Declaring their changed stance, the Maoists said they would now align “shoulder to shoulder with all political parties and protesting organisations” on public issues. “We have decided to lay down arms and declare a temporary ceasefire,” the release stated, adding that the party was prepared to hold talks with the Union Home Minister or his designated representatives.

The CPI (Maoist) explained that its decision was influenced by changing national and global conditions, along with repeated appeals by top government leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah, urging them to join the mainstream.

Conditions for Dialogue

The Maoists asked the government to formally announce a one-month ceasefire and suspend combing operations so that they could consult cadres across different states and those imprisoned. They also said they were ready for preliminary discussions with the government through a video call.

The statement requested that any official announcements on peace talks be broadcast via government radio and television channels so that cadres in remote forested areas without internet access could be informed.

Appeals to the Public

The Maoists appealed to labourers, Dalits, Adivasis, women, minorities, intellectuals, human rights defenders, writers, artists, and peace committees to appreciate the “very difficult circumstances” behind their decision and extend support to the peace process.

“We hope you will wholeheartedly cooperate in taking this process forward and help transform blood-soaked forests into forests of peace,” the statement read. They also shared an email address and a Facebook ID for sympathisers, supporters, and organisations to send their views.

The Maoist outfit has occasionally expressed readiness for talks in the past, in Andhra Pradesh in 2004 and West Bengal in 2010, but those efforts collapsed amid violence, conditions, and mistrust.

Bastar Range Inspector General of Police P. Sundarraj told TOI that they had taken note of the press release issued in the name of the CPI (Maoist) Central Committee. He said the authenticity of the document was being verified and its contents carefully examined. He added that any decision on engaging or opening dialogue with the Maoists rested with the government, which would take an appropriate call after due consideration of the situation.

(With inputs from Times of India)

Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Mi Lord, You’re Not The Lord: An Open Letter To Chief Justice Gavai Calling Out His Comments On Lord Vishnu For What It Is – Hate Speech

cji gavai chief justice gavai hindu beheaded vishnu idol

Mr. Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai — oh, the irony in your name! You bear “Ram” and “Krishna” in your very identity, yet your sharpest contempt is reserved for Lord Vishnu himself — the very deity Hindus revere as the protector and sustainer of the universe.

You are the Chief Justice of India, not a politician chasing vote banks. Your words should reflect the dignity of your office, not the tired habit of mocking Hindus that every so-called secular zealot indulges in.

When a petitioner sought the restoration of a mutilated idol of Lord Vishnu at the historic Javari temple in Khajuraho, your duty as the highest custodian of justice was to address the matter with dignity, restraint, and respect. Instead, you chose to mock the faith of devotees by sarcastically saying:

Go and ask the deity itself to do something now. You say you are a staunch devotee of Lord Vishnu. So go and pray now.”

These words were not just unnecessary; they were unbecoming of the Chief Justice of India. They were not judicial observations but derisive taunts—statements that trivialize Hindu belief and reduce centuries of devotion to the level of ridicule.

A Judge’s Duty Is To Uphold Dignity, Not Belittle Faith

No one disputes that the technical jurisdiction may lie with the Archaeological Survey of India. But there was no need to lace your verdict with disdain. A simple direction could have sufficed: refer the matter to the ASI, and let them decide. Instead, you turned the courtroom into a pulpit for mockery. In doing so, you crossed the line from judicial restraint to personal bias.

It appears that your Neo-Buddhist identity is clouding your judgment, with personal prejudice against Hinduism seeping into your words. The chair you occupy is far too sacred to be tainted by the impulses of a zealot.

Why Gavai’s Remarks Amount To Hate Speech

In constitutional terms, hate speech is not merely about calling for violence — it is also about speech that denigrates, mocks, or humiliates an entire community for its faith. When the Chief Justice of India tells a devotee to “go and ask the deity itself to do something,” he is not making a legal point; he is ridiculing the very foundation of a believer’s right under Article 25 of the Constitution — the freedom of conscience and the right to freely profess, practice, and propagate religion.

By dismissing the plea with derision instead of dignity, Justice Gavai crossed from judicial restraint into active disparagement. This was not just an insult to one petitioner; it was an institutional slight to every Hindu who reveres Lord Vishnu. If such words were spoken about a Prophet or a Christ figure, they would have instantly been condemned as hate speech. Why then should Hindus be forced to accept mockery of their gods as “casual remarks”?

When prejudice is uttered from the highest bench, it legitimizes Hinduphobia in society. That is why these remarks cannot be brushed aside as harmless wit — they must be recognized for what they are: hate speech against Hindus.

The Poisonous Mindset Behind The Mockery

Mr. Gavai’s insensitive remark is no different from the centuries-old vilification of Hindus as “kafirs” or “heathens” for worshipping idols. It reeks of the same poisonous Abrahamic superiority complex, the same contempt that Islamist radicals express when they mock Hindus with gomutra jibes.

Delegitimising the faith of Hindus is not essential to the interpretation of law. Normalising violence against consecrated idols — living deities for devotees — is not essential to the interpretation of law. Mainstreaming hate speech against Hindus is not a requirement for dispensing justice.

Upholding the Constitution and due process should never translate into the naked display of religious prejudice.

The Right To Worship Is Not A Joke

The petitioner did not ask the court to invoke divine powers. He asked for a mutilated idol, desecrated during Mughal invasions, to be restored. This is about history, heritage, and the fundamental right to worship. Dismissing the plea with a smirk only adds insult to injury, suggesting that Hindu concerns are unworthy of even serious legal scrutiny.

Mi Lord, You Are Not God

With all due respect, Mr. Gavai, the robes of the Chief Justice do not grant you the authority to mock the gods of millions. Your power lies in upholding the Constitution—not in ridiculing the faith of the people who look to you for justice. Your words have consequences. They embolden those who deride Hindu beliefs as backward and fan the flames of Hinduphobia in elite circles.

It is time you remember: the dignity of your office is not measured by the sharpness of your sarcasm but by the fairness of your conduct.

Mi Lord, don’t think of yourself as God.

Vallavaraayan is a political writer.

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

DMK Councillor Arrested In Erode For Brewing And Selling Illicit Liquor

erode dmk councillor illicit liquor

A Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) councillor has been arrested in connection with brewing and selling illicit liquor in Erode district. Police seized 7 liters of liquor and the materials used for distillation during the raid.

The incident came to light after the Erode District Maoist Prevention Unit police received confidential information that liquor was being illegally sold in the Appusamy garden, located in the Kuttaiya Kadu area near Kanchikoil in Perundurai taluka. Acting on the tip-off, police rushed to the spot and found evidence of brewing activity, along with ingredients required for making liquor.

Upon investigation, police identified the person responsible as Suresh Kumar (42), a DMK member from the Pethampalayam area near Kanchikoil. He is currently serving as the third ward councilor of the Pethampalayam Panchayat for the second term and also holds the position of deputy organizer of the Perundurai East Union DMK Youth Wing.

Police revealed that Suresh Kumar was engaged in the brewing and sale of liquor with the assistance of Muthusamy (50), who has been working in his garden for nearly 30 years.

Following this, police conducted searches at the residences of both men early yesterday morning. During the operation, about 7 liters of liquor kept for sale were seized, along with equipment used in distillation. Both Suresh Kumar and Muthusamy were arrested, interrogated, and later produced before the court, which remanded them to judicial custody.

Meanwhile, the Special Cell Police also confirmed receiving intelligence regarding illicit liquor operations in the Kuttaikadu area of Kanchikoil. A thorough search led to the discovery of brewing activities in the Appusamy estate. The arrests and seizure were subsequently handed over to the Erode District Prohibition Enforcement Police for further action.

BJP leader Annamalai called out the poor governance of the ruling DMK government. On his official X handle, he wrote, “Suresh Kumar, a DMK ward councillor and a youth wing functionary from Erode district, was recently caught selling illicit liquor. While DMK Ministers run licensed distilleries that supply the state-owned TASMAC, their grassroots functionaries operate backyard setups to peddle spurious liquor, endangering countless lives. Despite Tamil Nadu witnessing repeated tragedies and an unprecedented loss of lives, the DMK seems to have learned little from the horrific Kallakurichi hooch incident. From Marur Raja to Govindaraj alias Kannu Kutty, and now Suresh Kumar, the common thread binding them is that they are DMK men, and each has been implicated in the deadly trade of illicit liquor. DMK has successfully dragged TN back by 15 years!”

(With inputs from Times Now)

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“Go Ask The Deity Itself To Do Something”: Chief Justice Gavai Mocks Hindu Petitioner For Seeking Restoration Of Beheaded Vishnu Idol At Khajuraho

cji gavai chief justice gavai hindu beheaded vishnu idol

The Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to entertain a plea seeking the restoration of a 7-foot beheaded idol of Lord Vishnu at the Javari temple, part of the Khajuraho group of monuments in Madhya Pradesh. The case was filed under the title Rakesh Dalal v. Union of India.

A Bench comprising Chief Justice of India BR Gavai and Justice Augustine George Masih said that the matter did not fall under the jurisdiction of the Court but under that of the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI).

CJI Gavai, addressing the petitioner, remarked, “Go and ask the deity itself to do something now. You say you are a staunch devotee of Lord Vishnu. So go and pray now. It’s an archaeological site and ASI needs to give permission etc. Sorry.”

Notably, these remarks came from CJI BR Gavai, a Neo-Buddhist whose father had embraced Buddhism alongside Dr. B.R. Ambedkar in 1956.

The plea was filed by Rakesh Dalal, who contended that the idol had been mutilated during Mughal invasions and has remained in that state despite multiple representations made to the government seeking its restoration.

The petition recounted the history of the Khajuraho temples, which were originally built by the Chandravanshi kings, and alleged that both colonial neglect and post-independence inaction had resulted in the idol remaining unrepaired even 77 years after independence.

Dalal further argued that the government’s refusal to restore the idol violated devotees’ fundamental right to worship. The petition highlighted the protests, memoranda, and campaigns regarding the temple, which it said had gone unanswered.

(With inputs from Bar and Bench)

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

Supreme Court Grants Interim Bail To Bhima Koregaon Accused Mahesh Raut On Medical Grounds For Six Weeks, Co-Accused Bail Plea To Be Head In October

Supreme Court Grants Interim Bail To Bhima Koregaon Accused Mahesh Raut On Medical Grounds For Six Weeks, Co-Accused Bail Plea To Be Head In October

The Supreme Court on Tuesday (16 September 2025) granted interim bail on medical grounds for a period of six weeks to Bhima Koregaon–Elgar Parishad case accused Mahesh Raut, who has been under custody since June 2018 after being arrested under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, over alleged Maoist links.

A bench comprising Justice MM Sundresh and Justice Satish Kumar Sharma passed the order after Senior Advocate CU Singh submitted that Raut is suffering from Rheumatoid Arthritis, an autoimmune disorder that attacks the bones and muscles.

Although Additional Solicitor General SV Raju was not present, another counsel appearing on behalf of the National Investigation Agency (NIA) opposed the plea, contending that the allegations against Raut are serious since he is accused of transferring funds to Maoists.

Singh countered by pointing out that Raut was granted bail on merits by the Bombay High Court on 21 September 2023. However, the High Court had stayed its order for a week to allow the NIA to file an appeal. Subsequently, the NIA approached the Supreme Court, where a bench comprising Justice Aniruddha Bose and Justice Bela M Trivedi admitted the appeal and extended the High Court’s one-week stay until 5 October 2023. Since then, the stay has been extended from time to time.

Taking note of the submissions, Justice Sundresh observed that the Court is inclined to grant bail on medical grounds. The bench ordered:

“The applicant is seeking interim bail on medical grounds coupled with the fact that he was actually granted bail, we are inclined to grant medical bail for a period of 6 weeks.”

The plea of co-accused Jyoti Jagtap was also mentioned during the hearing by Senior Advocate Aparna Bhat, who submitted that the case has been pending for the last six to seven years. The bench said it will take up Jagtap’s case in October.

Jagtap, an activist and member of the cultural organisation Kabir Kala Manch, along with 16 others, was accused by the NIA of being responsible for the caste violence at Bhima Koregaon in Pune. According to the Pune Police (and later the NIA), inflammatory speeches at the Elgar Parishad, an event to commemorate the two hundredth anniversary of the Battle of Koregaon Bhima, triggered violent clashes between Maratha and Dalit groups near the village.

Following this, 16 activists, including Jagtap and Raut, were arrested for allegedly conspiring and planning the violence. They were charged under various provisions of the UAPA, based primarily on letters and emails retrieved from their electronic devices.

In February 2022, a special NIA court rejected Jagtap’s bail application, a decision later upheld by the Bombay High Court in October 2022. While dismissing her plea, a division bench of the High Court remarked that the dialogues in Kabir Kala Manch’s plays ridiculing phrases such as ‘Ram Mandir’, ‘Gomutra’, and ‘Acche Din’, which targeted the democratically elected government, incited hatred and indicated a larger conspiracy.

(With inputs from Live Law)

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

“Participation In Other Religions’ Festivals Does Not Offend Rights Under Constitution”: Karnataka High Court Upholds State’s Decision To Invite Banu Mushtaq As Dasara Chief Guest

banu mushtaq karnataka high court dasara

The Karnataka High Court dismissed a batch of petitions challenging the state government’s invitation to Booker Prize winner Banu Mushtaq as the chief guest for the Dasara festival inauguration in Mysuru.

A division bench of Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice C M Joshi held that “Participation of a person practicing a particular faith or religion, in celebrations of festivals of other religion does not offend the rights available under the Constitution of India.”

The petitioners had argued that it would be inappropriate for Mushtaq, a non-Hindu, to perform traditional Hindu rituals like lighting the sacred lamp, offering fruits and flowers to the deity, and chanting Vedic prayers, contending that such acts should only be performed by a Hindu.

The court, however, noted that “Undisputedly, respondent No.4 (Banu Mushtaq) is an accomplished author and 2025 Booker Prize winner. She is also a lawyer and a social activist. She has also served in various public offices…”

The bench observed that the petitioners’ right to practice and propagate religion under Article 25 of the Constitution “cannot be said to have been curtailed by merely inviting Mushtaq, an accomplished person.”

The state government, represented by Advocate General Shahi Kiran Shetty, argued that the inauguration is a state-organized function, not a temple-led religious ceremony, and cited a 2016 circular mandating that all temples under the state Religious Endowments Department grant free entry to all, without distinction of caste, community, religion, or gender.

The court agreed with the state’s position, noting that the Dasara festivities are organized by the state annually and have historically invited accomplished individuals from various fields. The decision to invite Mushtaq was made by a committee comprising elected representatives and government officials.

In its conclusion, the bench stated, “We are unable to accept that any legal or constitutional right of the petitioners is violated by extending the invitation to respondent No.4 to inaugurate the State sponsored Dasara festivities. In our view, the extension of invitation to respondent No.4 does not fall foul of any of the values enshrined in the Constitution of India.”

It added that “no right of any religious denomination or any Section thereon has been curtailed or restricted. None of the persons managing any religious denomination have come forward to claim that their right to maintain their institutions for religious and charitable purposes is being violated.”

(With inputs from Live Law)

Subscribe to our channels on TelegramWhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.