It’s extremely puzzling to see popular Tamil YouTubers consistently express support for countries like Pakistan and Palestine—nations widely known for harboring and backing terrorism. Without a shred of shame, these creators blame sovereign governments for responding to terrorism, while indirectly justifying or downplaying terrorist acts through twisted historical narratives. They frame justified military actions as attacks on innocent civilians, deliberately blurring the lines between self-defense and aggression. The logic is entirely missing—how can any sovereign state arbitrarily target another country’s citizens or wage war without cause? Yet these extremist sympathizers seem more interested in whitewashing terrorism than acknowledging the facts.
This disturbing trend of simping for Pakistan—despite its role as a breeding ground for numerous terror outfits and being behind horrors like the Pahalgam Hindu massacre—shows how far detached from reality some of these influencers are.
A glaring example is Tamil tech YouTuber Nanda Kumar, also known as “PC Doctor,” who recently uploaded a video bizarrely portraying Pakistan as merely poor and uneducated, claiming we shouldn’t fight them but instead offer help. Shockingly, his video thumbnail features provocative visuals suggesting that parts of Jammu and Kashmir belong to Pakistan and China, and he even boldly declares “I support Pakistan,” and makes taglines stating, “Don’t hate Pakistan. No war only love.” Such content isn’t just tone-deaf—it crosses into blatantly anti-national territory.
Right from the beginning of his video, he launches into anti-Indian rhetoric by stating: “India and Pakistan always mean trouble. If you ask me whether it’s in recent time—no, it’s been like this since the formation of Pakistan. From MG to news channels, everyone is posting videos about the recent incident. And if you see, all of India is speaking out against Pakistan. If you ask should we also talk like that? No. What I’m going to say today is: I support Pakistan.”
He begins by pushing a narrative aimed at lecturing the Indian government, claiming there’s no need for war because Pakistan’s economy is already in shambles. He goes on to compare Pakistan’s GDP and per capita income with that of Tamil Nadu, as if economic weakness somehow excuses or overshadows its long-standing support for terrorism.
Whitewashing Communal Riots Instigated by Jinnah While Painting Him as a Secular Icon
Nanda Kumar goes on to whitewash Pakistan’s communal foundation by portraying it as a secular state, claiming that Muhammad Ali Jinnah envisioned a nation where religion had no role in governance. To support this, he selectively cites Jinnah’s famous speech to Pakistan’s Constituent Assembly on 11 August 1947, in which Jinnah said, “You are free; you are free to go to your temples, you are free to go to your mosques or any other place of worship in this State of Pakistan. You may belong to any religion or caste or creed—that has nothing to do with the business of the State.”
However, what’s both ironic and deeply misleading is how this single speech is used to gloss over Jinnah’s actual political actions. Despite the idealistic tone of his address, Jinnah was the primary architect behind the creation of a separate Muslim nation—a decision that directly led to the catastrophic Partition of India. That event triggered one of the most violent episodes in the subcontinent’s history, causing the deaths of up to a million people and the displacement of over 10 million. For many, this makes it clear that Jinnah placed political ideology above human lives.
Even more disturbing is Jinnah’s call for Direct Action Day on 16 August 1946, a calculated move that sparked brutal communal riots in Calcutta (now Kolkata). Thousands were killed, and the event marked a turning point that intensified religious polarization. Yet, YouTubers like Nanda Kumar conveniently omit these facts, cherry-picking quotes to whitewash history and present Jinnah as a misunderstood secularist.
To downplay Jinnah’s role, these content creators go further—shifting the blame to the Pakistan Army, claiming it was their influence after Jinnah’s death (just 13 months after independence) that turned the country into a hardline Islamic state. This narrative deliberately ignores the fact that the foundation itself was based on religious separatism, which Jinnah openly championed.
Creating Sympathy for Pakistan after Operation Sindoor
Later in the video, Nanda Kumar shifts gears to generate sympathy for Pakistan—a nation widely known for supporting and sheltering terrorist groups. He paints a picture of Pakistan as economically fragile, with no significant investment except from China, a struggling economy dependent mainly on agriculture and textiles, and a low literacy rate of just 60%. Using this as justification, he argues that India should refrain from retaliating or going to war.
But the logic is baffling—if Pakistan is so economically and structurally weak, what justifies its continued support for terrorism and hostility toward its neighbors? Should a sovereign nation like India, whose primary responsibility is to protect its citizens, simply sit back and show sympathy toward a country that actively fuels cross-border terrorism?
As the video gained traction, Tamil YouTuber Nanda Kumar was called out by netizens for his statements, with many labeling him openly anti-national. This seems to be an increasingly common pattern in the state—whenever terrorists attack innocent civilians, particularly Hindus, certain YouTubers emerge, not to condemn the attackers, but to issue blanket statements like “don’t blame Indian Muslims.” Yet when Indian citizens point out the role of Pakistani-backed jihadist groups, and when the Indian government responds to terror attacks, these same influencers rush to create sympathy for Pakistan, echoing their narratives. This isn’t just hypocritical—it’s shameless and blatantly anti-Indian.
The same YouTuber who was exposed for selling grey-market Windows keys via his company, Nuke Technologies, linked to cdkeylabs.com. Despite preaching against scams, he profited from illegal software sales, earning just ₹1,000–1,500 vs. Microsoft’s ₹8,000–10,000. Investigations revealed his direct involvement, contradicting his “anti-scam” persona. Followers expressed outrage, calling him hypocritical. Nanda admitted to partnering with grey-market suppliers for higher commissions but claimed ignorance of operations.
Subscribe to our channels on Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram and get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.
