Home News Self-Styled ‘Finfluencer’ Finance With Harish Commits Suicide After Another YouTuber Exposes Him

Self-Styled ‘Finfluencer’ Finance With Harish Commits Suicide After Another YouTuber Exposes Him

By
The Commune
-
Self-Styled 'Finfluencer' Finance With Harish Commits Suicide After Another YouTuber Exposes Him

V Harish, the 27-year-old financial influencer behind the social media brand Finance With Harish, was found hanging at a rented villa in Muttukadu near Chennai on Monday night, 19 October 2026, as reported in NDTV. His death has triggered a controversy after his father accused YouTuber and tech executive Jason Samuel of cyberbullying him, while Samuel has denied the allegation and defended his investigation into Harish’s professional credentials and financial-advisory activities.

Harish had amassed more than 1.3 million followers on Instagram and also operated a YouTube channel. His father alleges that Harish came under severe mental stress after being targeted over his financial-advisory credentials and the repeated disabling of his social media accounts.

According to reports, Harish’s primary Instagram account was disabled by Meta in September following complaints against his content. His family claims that his replacement accounts were also repeatedly blocked, causing him considerable distress. Harish had subsequently begun releasing videos through a new handle.

His father has specifically named Jason Samuel in a complaint and sought a police investigation into the circumstances surrounding his death. The police are yet to register a case in connection with the death, according to the information available.

What Did Jason Samuel Expose?

Samuel, the CEO of venture studio Zemuria Inc., had published a video of approximately 67 minutes examining Harish’s professional claims, financial-advisory activities and regulatory credentials.

In a post on X on Tuesday evening, Samuel expressed shock and grief over Harish’s death but rejected the allegation that he had cyberbullied the influencer.

“I have not cyber-bullied him. I pointed out his lack of licence and authority, misrepresentation of licence and fraud on SEBI and AMFI where he has not got SEBI RIA for his work and misrepresented that he had an AMFI license when he got the ARN only recently,” Samuel wrote.

He added that he had explicitly asked Harish to obtain the appropriate SEBI registration and resume his activities with the required authorisation.

“I literally asked him in the video to come back and do this with a proper SEBI licence. I never intended or expected this drastic measure to happen and I mourn the loss,” he said.

Samuel’s video had focused on whether Harish was legally authorised to offer the financial-advisory services he claimed to provide.

The Allegations in Jason Samuel’ s Video

Samuel began by examining Harish’s public profile, which had over 1.3 million followers and more than 1,500 Instagram posts. Harish had presented himself as a financial advisor, a content creator, an NISM-certified professional and an advisor to high-net-worth individuals (HNIs).

In one of his own videos, Harish reportedly claimed to work with clients whose individual net worth exceeded ₹100 crore, including one client worth more than ₹1,000 crore.

Samuel questioned whether Harish’s professional claims were backed by the necessary regulatory authorisation.

He argued that financial education and general economic commentary do not automatically require SEBI registration, but certain activities such as providing investment advice on securities, recommending specific stocks or mutual funds, and designing personalised investment portfolios may require registration, depending on the nature of the services.

Samuel alleged that Harish had crossed that line by offering investment recommendations and paid advisory services without being registered as a SEBI Registered Investment Adviser (RIA).

To support his allegations, Samuel played archived clips from Harish’s social media accounts and cited posts dating back to December 2023. One such post carried the caption “Multi-bagger stocks for future multi-millionaires.” Samuel questioned whether Harish was authorised to recommend such stocks.

He also referred to Harish’s claims of working as a financial advisor for HNIs and providing paid consultations.

Harish’s Own Claims About His Income

A major section of Samuel’s video examined a video Harish had published on March 11, 2025, in which he discussed his earnings.

According to the clip played by Samuel, Harish claimed to earn:

  • ₹50,000–₹60,000 a month from consultations.
  • ₹1 lakh–₹1.5 lakh from brand promotions and collaborations.
  • ₹20 lakh–₹25 lakh as salary.
  • ₹10,000–₹12,000 a month from Instagram subscriptions.
  • ₹5 lakh–₹10 lakh annually from trading.
  • ₹30,000–₹40,000 a month as chief strategist and financial advisor to a friend’s company.

Harish said his average monthly earnings were around ₹3 lakh–₹3.5 lakh, of which approximately ₹2 lakh went towards staff salaries, rent, living expenses and taxes. He said he reinvested the remaining ₹1 lakh–₹1.5 lakh.

He also claimed that he worked with HNI clients and employed four people.

Samuel questioned whether Harish could legally offer investment-advisory services merely by holding an NISM certification or having professional experience. He emphasised that an NISM qualification does not, by itself, amount to SEBI registration as an RIA.

Samuel also argued that paying income tax on earnings does not establish that the underlying business activity is legally authorised.

The Instagram Account Controversy

Samuel addressed the circumstances surrounding the disabling of Harish’s main Instagram account.

According to Samuel, he had not personally reported the account. He claimed that individuals who had reported Harish’s content shared notifications from Instagram with him. These notifications reportedly stated that the account had been removed for violating the platform’s Community Standards.

Samuel said he redacted the case numbers in the screenshots to protect the identities of those who had submitted the reports.

He alleged that the complaints concerned Harish’s claimed professional credentials and his provision of financial advice without the necessary authorisation.

Harish, however, had reportedly attributed the account’s disappearance to issues such as comment automation and had indicated that he was attempting to recover it.

His family maintains that the repeated disabling of his accounts and the public allegations caused him significant emotional distress.

The Legal Question: What Does SEBI Require?

The controversy raises a wider question about the legal obligations of financial influencers who offer investment-related services to their followers.

Under the SEBI (Investment Advisers) Regulations, 2013, persons carrying on the business of providing investment advice in securities must generally obtain the required registration, subject to applicable exemptions. The distinction is between sharing general financial information and providing regulated investment advice.

An NISM certification or an AMFI Registration Number (ARN) does not automatically confer the status of a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser.

AMFI registration is associated with mutual fund distribution, while SEBI RIA registration governs the regulated business of investment advice. The precise registration requirements depend on the activities undertaken.

Samuel alleged that Harish had represented himself as a licensed financial advisor despite not holding SEBI RIA registration. He also questioned whether Harish’s claims about his qualifications and professional authorisation were accurate.

The allegation that Harish had misrepresented his credentials remains an allegation; the available material does not establish a final regulatory or judicial finding against him.

What the Union Finance Ministry told Parliament

The issue of unregistered financial influencers has also been addressed by the Union government.

In response to Rajya Sabha Unstarred Question No. 1194 on 10 February 2026, the Ministry of Finance stated that SEBI receives investor complaints concerning misleading claims and advice disseminated by unauthorised persons on social media.

The ministry said SEBI does not maintain a separate database of complaints specifically relating to unregistered financial influencers. However, it has taken enforcement action against entities providing unregistered investment-advisory services, including interim and enforcement orders and directions to refund affected investors.

The ministry also disclosed that the total amount disgorged through SEBI orders concerning unregistered investment-advisory activities since 2024 was ₹665.26 crore.

It further referred to Section 12 of the SEBI Act, 1992, and Regulation 16A of the SEBI (Intermediaries) Regulations, 2008, which restricts associations between SEBI-regulated entities and persons providing unauthorised advice or making unauthorised claims through social and digital media.

In its response, the government reiterated that investment advisers must comply with the applicable regulatory framework and highlighted malpractices such as assured-return promises and exorbitant advisory fees.

Harish’s Claims about SEBI and Direct Mutual Funds

The controversy has also drawn attention to claims made by Harish about his previous interactions with the regulator.

A video of Harish himself saying he had been warned by SEBI the previous year is circulating on social media.

Cyberbullying or Public Accountability?

Samuel maintains that his video exposed alleged misrepresentation of credentials and unauthorised financial-advisory activities that could harm investors. Harish’s father, however, alleges that the public targeting and repeated disabling of his social media accounts caused his son severe distress.

The video merely exposed Harish for what he was doing without a SEBI certification. To call it cyberbullying simply because he later died by suicide is to conflate public accountability with harassment.

Subscribe to our channels on WhatsApp, Telegram, Instagram and YouTube to get the best stories of the day delivered to you personally.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR